Extension of Time Limits for Preliminary Results and Final Results of the Full Sunset Review of the Antidumping Duty Orders on Ball Bearings and Parts Thereof from Japan and Singapore, 55332 [05-18852]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
55332
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 182 / Wednesday, September 21, 2005 / Notices
Parking areas in 2 to 3 areas would be
established or modified.
Possible Alternatives
Preliminary alternatives which have
been identified include the proposed
action and the no action alternatives.
Responsible Official
David T. Bull, Forest Supervisor,
Bitterroot National Forest, 1801 N. First,
Hamilton, MT 59840.
Nature of Decision To Be Made
The Responsible Official will
determine whether or not to proceed
with the proposed project activities.
Scoping Process
Comments will be accepted during
the 30-day scoping period as described
in this notice of intent. To assist in
commenting, a scoping letter providing
more detailed information on the project
proposal has been prepared and is
available to interested parties. Contact
Chuck Oliver, Darby District Ranger at
the address listed in this notice of intent
if you would like to receive a copy. An
open house in Darby, Montana is
planned on October 12, 2005 in Darby,
Montana. This will be an opportunity
for you to interact with team members
to clarify the proposed project.
Preliminary Issues
Impacts to the viewshed from the
town of Darby.
Comment Requested
This notice of intent initiates the
scoping process which guides the
development of the environmental
impact statement.
Early Notice of Importance of Public
Participation in Subsequent
Environmental Review
The comment period on the draft
environmental impact statement will be
45 days from the date the
Environmental Protection Agency
publishes the notice of availability in
the Federal Register.
The Forest Service believes, at this
early stage, it is important to give
reviewers notice of several court rulings
related to public participation in the
environmental review process. First,
reviewers of draft environmental impact
statements must structure their
participation in the environmental
review of the proposal so that it is
meaningful and alerts an agency to the
reviewer’s position and contentions.
Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v.
NRDC, 435 U.S. 519, 553 (1978). Also,
environmental objections that could be
raised at the draft environmental impact
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:40 Sep 20, 2005
Jkt 205001
statement but that are not raised until
after completion of the final
environmental impact statement may be
waived or dismissed by the courts. City
of Angoon v. Hodel, 803 F.2d 1016,
1022 (9th Cir. 1986) and Wisconsin
Heritages, Inc. v. Harris, 490 F. Supp.
1334, 1338 (E.D. Wis. 1980). Because of
these court rulings, it is very important
that those interested in this proposed
action participate by the close of the 45
day-comment period so that substantive
comments and objections are made
available to the Forest Service at a time
when it can meaningfully consider them
and respond to them in the final
environmental impact statement. To
assist the Forest Service in identifying
and considering issues and concerns on
the proposed action, comments on the
draft environmental impact statement
should be as specific as possible. It is
also helpful if comments refer to
specific pages or chapters of the draft
statement. Comments may also address
the adequacy of the draft environmental
impact statement or the merits of the
alternatives formulated and discussed in
the statement. Reviewers may wish to
refer to the Council on Environmental
Quality Regulations for implementing
the procedural provisions of the
National Environmental Policy Act at 40
CFR 1503.3 in addressing these points.
Additional public comment will be
accepted after publication of the DEIS
anticipated early in 2006. The
Environmental Protection Agency will
publish the Notice of Availability of the
Draft Environmental Impact Statement
in the Federal Register. The Forest will
also publish a legal notice of availability
in the Ravalli Republic, Hamilton,
Montana. The comment period on the
Draft EIS will begin the day after the
legal notice is published. The Final EIS
and Decision are expected late in 2006.
Dated: September 15, 2005.
David T. Bull,
Forest Supervisor.
[FR Doc. 05–18792 Filed 9–20–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–11–M
PO 00000
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
(A–588–804, A–559–801)
Extension of Time Limits for
Preliminary Results and Final Results
of the Full Sunset Review of the
Antidumping Duty Orders on Ball
Bearings and Parts Thereof from
Japan and Singapore
Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce.
AGENCY:
EFFECTIVE DATE:
September 21, 2005.
Zev
Primor at 202–482–4114 or Fred W.
Aziz at 202–482–4023, Import
Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street & Constitution
Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Extension of Time Limits
In accordance with section
751(c)(5)(B) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (the Act), the U.S. Department
of Commerce (the Department) may
extend the period of time for making its
determination by not more than 90 days,
if it determines that the sunset review
is extraordinarily complicated. As set
forth in 751(c)(5)(C)(v) of the Act, the
Department may treat a sunset review as
extraordinarily complicated if it is a
review of a transition order. The sunset
reviews subject to this notice are
transition orders. Therefore, the
Department has determined, pursuant to
section 751(c)(5)(C)(v) of the Act, that
these sunset reviews are extraordinarily
complicated and require additional time
for the Department to complete its
analysis.
The Department’s preliminary results
of these full sunset reviews were
scheduled for September 19, 2005, and
the final results were scheduled for
January 27, 2006. They are now being
extended until December 19, 2005, and
April 27, 2006, respectively. These dates
are 90 days from the original scheduled
dates of the preliminary and final
results of these sunset reviews.
This notice is issued in accordance
with sections 751(c)(5)(B) and (C)(v) of
the Act.
Dated: September 15, 2005.
Barbara E. Tillman,
Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration.
[FR Doc. 05–18852 Filed 9–20–05; 8:45 am]
(BILLING CODE: 3510–DS–SP)
Frm 00002
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\21SEN1.SGM
21SEN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 182 (Wednesday, September 21, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 55332]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-18852]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
(A-588-804, A-559-801)
Extension of Time Limits for Preliminary Results and Final
Results of the Full Sunset Review of the Antidumping Duty Orders on
Ball Bearings and Parts Thereof from Japan and Singapore
AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S.
Department of Commerce.
EFFECTIVE DATE: September 21, 2005.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Zev Primor at 202-482-4114 or Fred W.
Aziz at 202-482-4023, Import Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street & Constitution
Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230.
Extension of Time Limits
In accordance with section 751(c)(5)(B) of the Tariff Act of 1930,
as amended (the Act), the U.S. Department of Commerce (the Department)
may extend the period of time for making its determination by not more
than 90 days, if it determines that the sunset review is
extraordinarily complicated. As set forth in 751(c)(5)(C)(v) of the
Act, the Department may treat a sunset review as extraordinarily
complicated if it is a review of a transition order. The sunset reviews
subject to this notice are transition orders. Therefore, the Department
has determined, pursuant to section 751(c)(5)(C)(v) of the Act, that
these sunset reviews are extraordinarily complicated and require
additional time for the Department to complete its analysis.
The Department's preliminary results of these full sunset reviews
were scheduled for September 19, 2005, and the final results were
scheduled for January 27, 2006. They are now being extended until
December 19, 2005, and April 27, 2006, respectively. These dates are 90
days from the original scheduled dates of the preliminary and final
results of these sunset reviews.
This notice is issued in accordance with sections 751(c)(5)(B) and
(C)(v) of the Act.
Dated: September 15, 2005.
Barbara E. Tillman,
Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import Administration.
[FR Doc. 05-18852 Filed 9-20-05; 8:45 am]
(BILLING CODE: 3510-DS-SP)
