Notice of Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review: Low Enriched Uranium From France, 54359-54360 [E5-5019]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 177 / Wednesday, September 14, 2005 / Notices
consumption in the United States on or
after the publication of this notice of
rescission of antidumping duty new
shipper review in the Federal Register.
Further, effective upon publication of
this notice, for all shipments of the
subject merchandise exported by Xian
XiongLi and entered, or withdrawn from
warehouse, for consumption, the cash
deposit rate will be the PRC-wide rate,
which is 376.67 percent.
Notification to Parties Subject to
Administrative Protective Orders
This notice serves as a reminder to
parties subject to administrative
protective orders (‘‘APO’’) of their
responsibility concerning the
disposition of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance
with section 351.305(a)(3) of the
Department’s regulations. Timely
written notification of the return/
destruction of APO material or
conversion to judicial protective order is
hereby requested. Failure to comply
with the regulations and terms of an
APO is a violation which is subject to
sanctions.
We are issuing and publishing this
determination and notice in accordance
with sections 751(a)(2)(B) and 777(i)(1)
of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended,
and 19 CFR 351.214(f)(3).
Dated: September 7, 2005.
Barbara E. Tillman,
Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration.
[FR Doc. E5–5020 Filed 9–13–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–427–818]
Notice of Final Results of Antidumping
Duty Administrative Review: Low
Enriched Uranium From France
Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On March 7, 2005, the
Department of Commerce (the
Department) published the preliminary
results of its second administrative
review of the antidumping duty order
on low enriched uranium (LEU) from
France. The review covers one producer
of the subject merchandise. The period
of review (POR) is February 1, 2003,
through January 31, 2004. Based on our
analysis of the comments received, we
have made changes to the preliminary
results. For the final dumping margins
see the ‘‘Final Results of Review’’
section below.
AGENCY:
VerDate Aug<18>2005
16:17 Sep 13, 2005
Jkt 205001
EFFECTIVE DATE:
September 14, 2005.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Myrna Lobo or Elfi Blum at (202) 482–
2371 or (202) 482–0197, respectively;
AD/CVD Operations, Office 6, Import
Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street & Constitution
Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On March 7, 2005, the Department
published in the Federal Register the
preliminary results of the second
administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on LEU from
France. See Low Enriched Uranium
From France: Preliminary Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review, 70 FR 10957 (March 7, 2005),
(Preliminary Results).
We invited parties to comment on the
Preliminary Results. On June 30, 2005,
we received case briefs from the sole
respondent, Eurodif S.A., Compagnie
´ ´
`
´
Generale Des Matieres Nucleaires, S.A.
and COGEMA, Inc. (collectively,
Eurodif/COGEMA), and the petitioner,
the United States Enrichment
Corporation and USEC Inc. (collectively,
USEC). Eurodif/COGEMA and USEC
submitted their rebuttal briefs on July 8,
2005.
On June 15–17, 2005, the Department
conducted verification of the
information submitted by respondent on
´
´
behalf of Electricite de France (EdF), an
affiliated electricity supplier, and of the
research and development (R&D)
activities conducted by the
`
Commissariat a l’Energie Atomique
(CEA). Eurodif/COGEMA and USEC
submitted comments to the verification
report on July 22, 2005, and July 25,
2005, respectively. Eurodif/COGEMA
submitted its rebuttal comments on July
28, 2005 (amended on August 2, 2005),
and USEC submitted its rebuttal
comments on July 27, 2005.
A hearing was held on August 4,
2005. At petitioner’s request, a portion
of the hearing was conducted on a
closed basis, for purposes of discussing
business proprietary information.
On August 25, 2005, the Department
placed on the record of this review new
information pertaining to USEC’s R&D
activities into centrifuge technology and
invited the parties to comment. Eurodif/
COGEMA and the petitioner filed their
comments on August 29, 2005, and their
rebuttals on August 31, 2005.
Scope of the Order
The product covered by this order is
all low enriched uranium (LEU). LEU is
enriched uranium hexafluoride (UF6)
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
54359
with a U 235 product assay of less than
20 percent that has not been converted
into another chemical form, such as
UO2, or fabricated into nuclear fuel
assemblies, regardless of the means by
which the LEU is produced (including
LEU produced through the downblending of highly enriched uranium).
Certain merchandise is outside the
scope of this order. Specifically, this
order does not cover enriched uranium
hexafluoride with a U235 assay of 20
percent or greater, also known as highly
enriched uranium. In addition,
fabricated LEU is not covered by the
scope of this order. For purposes of this
order, fabricated uranium is defined as
enriched uranium dioxide (UO 2),
whether or not contained in nuclear fuel
rods or assemblies. Natural uranium
concentrates (U3O8) with a U235
concentration of no greater than 0.711
percent and natural uranium
concentrates converted into uranium
hexafluoride with a U235 concentration
of no greater than 0.711 percent are not
covered by the scope of this order.
Also excluded from this order is LEU
owned by a foreign utility end-user and
imported into the United States by or for
such end-user solely for purposes of
conversion by a U.S. fabricator into
uranium dioxide (UO2) and/or
fabrication into fuel assemblies so long
as the uranium dioxide and/or fuel
assemblies deemed to incorporate such
imported LEU (i) remain in the
possession and control of the U.S.
fabricator, the foreign end-user, or their
designed transporter(s) while in U.S.
customs territory, and (ii) are reexported within eighteen (18) months of
entry of the LEU for consumption by the
end-user in a nuclear reactor outside the
United States. Such entries must be
accompanied by the certifications of the
importer and end-user.
The merchandise subject to this order
is currently classifiable in the
Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the
United States (HTSUS) at subheading
2844.20.0020. Subject merchandise may
also enter under 2844.20.0030,
2844.20.0050, and 2844.40.00. Although
the HTSUS subheadings are provided
for convenience and customs purposes,
the written description of the
merchandise is dispositive.
Verification
As provided in section 782(i) of the
Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act),
on June 15–17, 2005 we verified the
information submitted by Eurodif/
COGEMA regarding its POR purchases
of electricity from EdF, and R&D
expenses incurred during the POR by
the CEA and attributable to Eurodif/
COGEMA. We used standard
E:\FR\FM\14SEN1.SGM
14SEN1
54360
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 177 / Wednesday, September 14, 2005 / Notices
verification procedures, including onsite examination of relevant accounting
and production records and original
source documents provided by Eurodif/
COGEMA. Our verification results are
outlined in the Memorandum to Neal M.
Halper, Director, From Ernest Z.
Gziryan, Senior Accountant; Ref.:
Administrative Review of Low Enriched
Uranium from France; Subj.:
Verification Report on the Cost of
Production Data Submitted by
´
Electricite de France (July 11, 2005)
(EdF Verification Report), and
Memorandum to The File Through Dana
Mermelstein From Elfi Blum:
Verification of research and
development expenses at the French
Atomic Energy Commission (CEA) (July
11, 2005) (CEA Verification Report).
Public versions of both reports are on
file in the Import Administration
Central Records Unit (CRU), in room B–
099 of the Department of Commerce.
Analysis of Comments Received
The issues raised in all case and
rebuttal briefs by parties to this
administrative review are addressed in
the Issues and Decision Memorandum
to Joseph A. Spetrini, Acting Assistant
Secretary for Import Administration,
from Barbara E. Tillman, Acting Deputy
Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration (Decision
Memorandum), which is hereby
adopted by this notice. A list of the
issues addressed in the Decision
Memorandum is appended to this
notice. The Decision Memorandum is on
file in the CRU, and can be accessed
directly on the Web at https://
www.ia.ita.doc.gov. The paper copy and
electronic version of the Decision
Memorandum are identical in content.
Changes Since the Preliminary Results
Based on our analysis of comments
received, we have made adjustments to
the methodology used in calculating the
final dumping margin. The adjustments
are discussed in detail in the Decision
Memorandum.
Final Results of Review
As a result of our review, we
determine that the following weightedaverage margin exists for the period of
February 1, 2003, through January 31,
2004:
Manufacturer/Exporter
Eurodif/COGEMA .....................
Margin
(percent)
12.62
Assessment
The Department will determine, and
U.S. Customs and Border Protection
VerDate Aug<18>2005
16:17 Sep 13, 2005
Jkt 205001
(CBP) shall assess, antidumping duties
on all appropriate entries, pursuant to
19 CFR 351.212(b). The Department
calculated importer-specific duty
assessment rates on the basis of the ratio
of the total amount of antidumping
duties calculated for the examined sales
to the total entered value of the
examined sales for that importer. Where
the assessment rate is above de minimis,
we will instruct CBP to assess duties on
all entries of subject merchandise by
that importer. The Department will not
issue liquidation instructions for any
entries of Eurodif merchandise until
such time as the July 1, 2002, injunction
issued by the Court of International
Trade, is lifted.
Cash Deposits
Furthermore, the following deposit
requirements will be effective upon
publication of the final results of this
administrative review for all shipments
of LEU from France entered, or
withdrawn from warehouse, for
consumption on or after the publication
date of these final results, as provided
by section 751(a) of the Act: (1) For
companies covered by this review, the
cash deposit rate will be the rate listed
above; (2) for merchandise exported by
producers or exporters not covered in
this review but covered in a previous
segment of this proceeding, the cash
deposit rate will continue to be the
company-specific rate published in the
most recent final results in which that
producer or exporter participated; (3) if
the exporter is not a firm covered in this
review or in any previous segment of
this proceeding, but the producer is, the
cash deposit rate will be that established
for the producer of the merchandise in
these final results of review or in the
most recent final results in which that
producer participated; and (4) if neither
the exporter nor the producer is a firm
covered in this review or in any
previous segment of this proceeding, the
cash deposit rate will be 19.95 percent,
the ‘‘All Others’’ rate established in the
less-than-fair-value investigation. These
deposit requirements shall remain in
effect until publication of the final
results of the next administrative
review.
Reimbursement
This notice also serves as a final
reminder to importers of their
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)
to file a certificate regarding the
reimbursement of antidumping duties
prior to liquidation of the relevant
entries during this review period.
Failure to comply with this requirement
could result in the Secretary’s
presumption that reimbursement of
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
antidumping duties occurred, and in the
subsequent assessment of double
antidumping duties.
Notification Regarding Administrative
Protective Orders
This notice is the only reminder to
parties subject to the administrative
protective order (APO) of their
responsibility concerning the return or
destruction of proprietary information
disclosed under the APO in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.305. Timely written
notification of the return or destruction
of APO materials or conversion to
judicial protective order is hereby
requested. Failure to comply with the
regulations and the terms of an APO is
a sanctionable violation.
We are issuing and publishing these
results and notice in accordance with
sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the
Act.
Dated: September 6, 2005.
Joseph A. Spetrini,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration.
Appendix I—Issues in Decision
Memorandum
Comment 1: Goods Versus Services
Comment 2: Eurodif’s Cost of Purchases of
Electricity From the Affiliated Supplier
Comment 3: Established Market Price for
Electricity
Comment 4: Excluded Costs in EdF’s Cost of
Production
Comment 5: Cogema’s R&D Expenses
Comment 6: CEA’s R&D for Centrifuge
Enrichment Technology
Comment 7: Use of USEC’s Financial
Statements
Comment 8: Goodwill Expenses in
Constructed Value (CV) Profit
Comment 9: Inter-Company Sales as Part of
Sales Revenues in CV Profit
Comment 10: Offset to COGEMA’s Interest
Expense for Income on Short-Term
Investment
Comment 11: Date of Sale for Certain
Deliveries
Comment 12: Cost of Uranium in the
Calculation of CEP and CV
Comment 13: Indirect Selling Expense Rate
Comment 14: Attribution of Indirect Selling
Expenses
Comment 15: Ministerial Error in the CV
Calculation for G&A, Interest Rate, and
CV Profit
[FR Doc. E5–5019 Filed 9–13–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
E:\FR\FM\14SEN1.SGM
14SEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 177 (Wednesday, September 14, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 54359-54360]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E5-5019]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-427-818]
Notice of Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review: Low Enriched Uranium From France
AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On March 7, 2005, the Department of Commerce (the Department)
published the preliminary results of its second administrative review
of the antidumping duty order on low enriched uranium (LEU) from
France. The review covers one producer of the subject merchandise. The
period of review (POR) is February 1, 2003, through January 31, 2004.
Based on our analysis of the comments received, we have made changes to
the preliminary results. For the final dumping margins see the ``Final
Results of Review'' section below.
EFFECTIVE DATE: September 14, 2005.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Myrna Lobo or Elfi Blum at (202) 482-
2371 or (202) 482-0197, respectively; AD/CVD Operations, Office 6,
Import Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S.
Department of Commerce, 14th Street & Constitution Avenue, NW.,
Washington, DC 20230.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On March 7, 2005, the Department published in the Federal Register
the preliminary results of the second administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on LEU from France. See Low Enriched Uranium
From France: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review, 70 FR 10957 (March 7, 2005), (Preliminary Results).
We invited parties to comment on the Preliminary Results. On June
30, 2005, we received case briefs from the sole respondent, Eurodif
S.A., Compagnie G[eacute]n[eacute]rale Des Mati[egrave]res
Nucl[eacute]aires, S.A. and COGEMA, Inc. (collectively, Eurodif/
COGEMA), and the petitioner, the United States Enrichment Corporation
and USEC Inc. (collectively, USEC). Eurodif/COGEMA and USEC submitted
their rebuttal briefs on July 8, 2005.
On June 15-17, 2005, the Department conducted verification of the
information submitted by respondent on behalf of
[Eacute]lectricit[eacute] de France (EdF), an affiliated electricity
supplier, and of the research and development (R&D) activities
conducted by the Commissariat [agrave] l'Energie Atomique (CEA).
Eurodif/COGEMA and USEC submitted comments to the verification report
on July 22, 2005, and July 25, 2005, respectively. Eurodif/COGEMA
submitted its rebuttal comments on July 28, 2005 (amended on August 2,
2005), and USEC submitted its rebuttal comments on July 27, 2005.
A hearing was held on August 4, 2005. At petitioner's request, a
portion of the hearing was conducted on a closed basis, for purposes of
discussing business proprietary information.
On August 25, 2005, the Department placed on the record of this
review new information pertaining to USEC's R&D activities into
centrifuge technology and invited the parties to comment. Eurodif/
COGEMA and the petitioner filed their comments on August 29, 2005, and
their rebuttals on August 31, 2005.
Scope of the Order
The product covered by this order is all low enriched uranium
(LEU). LEU is enriched uranium hexafluoride (UF6) with a U
235 product assay of less than 20 percent that has not been
converted into another chemical form, such as UO2, or
fabricated into nuclear fuel assemblies, regardless of the means by
which the LEU is produced (including LEU produced through the down-
blending of highly enriched uranium).
Certain merchandise is outside the scope of this order.
Specifically, this order does not cover enriched uranium hexafluoride
with a U\235\ assay of 20 percent or greater, also known as highly
enriched uranium. In addition, fabricated LEU is not covered by the
scope of this order. For purposes of this order, fabricated uranium is
defined as enriched uranium dioxide (UO 2), whether or not
contained in nuclear fuel rods or assemblies. Natural uranium
concentrates (U3O8) with a U\235\ concentration
of no greater than 0.711 percent and natural uranium concentrates
converted into uranium hexafluoride with a U\235\ concentration of no
greater than 0.711 percent are not covered by the scope of this order.
Also excluded from this order is LEU owned by a foreign utility
end-user and imported into the United States by or for such end-user
solely for purposes of conversion by a U.S. fabricator into uranium
dioxide (UO2) and/or fabrication into fuel assemblies so
long as the uranium dioxide and/or fuel assemblies deemed to
incorporate such imported LEU (i) remain in the possession and control
of the U.S. fabricator, the foreign end-user, or their designed
transporter(s) while in U.S. customs territory, and (ii) are re-
exported within eighteen (18) months of entry of the LEU for
consumption by the end-user in a nuclear reactor outside the United
States. Such entries must be accompanied by the certifications of the
importer and end-user.
The merchandise subject to this order is currently classifiable in
the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) at
subheading 2844.20.0020. Subject merchandise may also enter under
2844.20.0030, 2844.20.0050, and 2844.40.00. Although the HTSUS
subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes, the
written description of the merchandise is dispositive.
Verification
As provided in section 782(i) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended
(the Act), on June 15-17, 2005 we verified the information submitted by
Eurodif/COGEMA regarding its POR purchases of electricity from EdF, and
R&D expenses incurred during the POR by the CEA and attributable to
Eurodif/COGEMA. We used standard
[[Page 54360]]
verification procedures, including on-site examination of relevant
accounting and production records and original source documents
provided by Eurodif/COGEMA. Our verification results are outlined in
the Memorandum to Neal M. Halper, Director, From Ernest Z. Gziryan,
Senior Accountant; Ref.: Administrative Review of Low Enriched Uranium
from France; Subj.: Verification Report on the Cost of Production Data
Submitted by Electricit[eacute] de France (July 11, 2005) (EdF
Verification Report), and Memorandum to The File Through Dana
Mermelstein From Elfi Blum: Verification of research and development
expenses at the French Atomic Energy Commission (CEA) (July 11, 2005)
(CEA Verification Report). Public versions of both reports are on file
in the Import Administration Central Records Unit (CRU), in room B-099
of the Department of Commerce.
Analysis of Comments Received
The issues raised in all case and rebuttal briefs by parties to
this administrative review are addressed in the Issues and Decision
Memorandum to Joseph A. Spetrini, Acting Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration, from Barbara E. Tillman, Acting Deputy Assistant
Secretary for Import Administration (Decision Memorandum), which is
hereby adopted by this notice. A list of the issues addressed in the
Decision Memorandum is appended to this notice. The Decision Memorandum
is on file in the CRU, and can be accessed directly on the Web at
https://www.ia.ita.doc.gov. The paper copy and electronic version of the
Decision Memorandum are identical in content.
Changes Since the Preliminary Results
Based on our analysis of comments received, we have made
adjustments to the methodology used in calculating the final dumping
margin. The adjustments are discussed in detail in the Decision
Memorandum.
Final Results of Review
As a result of our review, we determine that the following
weighted-average margin exists for the period of February 1, 2003,
through January 31, 2004:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Margin
Manufacturer/Exporter (percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Eurodif/COGEMA............................................. 12.62
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Assessment
The Department will determine, and U.S. Customs and Border
Protection (CBP) shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate
entries, pursuant to 19 CFR 351.212(b). The Department calculated
importer-specific duty assessment rates on the basis of the ratio of
the total amount of antidumping duties calculated for the examined
sales to the total entered value of the examined sales for that
importer. Where the assessment rate is above de minimis, we will
instruct CBP to assess duties on all entries of subject merchandise by
that importer. The Department will not issue liquidation instructions
for any entries of Eurodif merchandise until such time as the July 1,
2002, injunction issued by the Court of International Trade, is lifted.
Cash Deposits
Furthermore, the following deposit requirements will be effective
upon publication of the final results of this administrative review for
all shipments of LEU from France entered, or withdrawn from warehouse,
for consumption on or after the publication date of these final
results, as provided by section 751(a) of the Act: (1) For companies
covered by this review, the cash deposit rate will be the rate listed
above; (2) for merchandise exported by producers or exporters not
covered in this review but covered in a previous segment of this
proceeding, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the company-
specific rate published in the most recent final results in which that
producer or exporter participated; (3) if the exporter is not a firm
covered in this review or in any previous segment of this proceeding,
but the producer is, the cash deposit rate will be that established for
the producer of the merchandise in these final results of review or in
the most recent final results in which that producer participated; and
(4) if neither the exporter nor the producer is a firm covered in this
review or in any previous segment of this proceeding, the cash deposit
rate will be 19.95 percent, the ``All Others'' rate established in the
less-than-fair-value investigation. These deposit requirements shall
remain in effect until publication of the final results of the next
administrative review.
Reimbursement
This notice also serves as a final reminder to importers of their
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f) to file a certificate regarding
the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the
relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply with this
requirement could result in the Secretary's presumption that
reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred, and in the subsequent
assessment of double antidumping duties.
Notification Regarding Administrative Protective Orders
This notice is the only reminder to parties subject to the
administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility
concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information
disclosed under the APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305. Timely
written notification of the return or destruction of APO materials or
conversion to judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to
comply with the regulations and the terms of an APO is a sanctionable
violation.
We are issuing and publishing these results and notice in
accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act.
Dated: September 6, 2005.
Joseph A. Spetrini,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Import Administration.
Appendix I--Issues in Decision Memorandum
Comment 1: Goods Versus Services
Comment 2: Eurodif's Cost of Purchases of Electricity From the
Affiliated Supplier
Comment 3: Established Market Price for Electricity
Comment 4: Excluded Costs in EdF's Cost of Production
Comment 5: Cogema's R&D Expenses
Comment 6: CEA's R&D for Centrifuge Enrichment Technology
Comment 7: Use of USEC's Financial Statements
Comment 8: Goodwill Expenses in Constructed Value (CV) Profit
Comment 9: Inter-Company Sales as Part of Sales Revenues in CV
Profit
Comment 10: Offset to COGEMA's Interest Expense for Income on Short-
Term Investment
Comment 11: Date of Sale for Certain Deliveries
Comment 12: Cost of Uranium in the Calculation of CEP and CV
Comment 13: Indirect Selling Expense Rate
Comment 14: Attribution of Indirect Selling Expenses
Comment 15: Ministerial Error in the CV Calculation for G&A,
Interest Rate, and CV Profit
[FR Doc. E5-5019 Filed 9-13-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P