Filings Under the Public Utility Holding Company Act of 1935, as Amended (“Act”), 54421-54424 [E5-5013]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 177 / Wednesday, September 14, 2005 / Notices
the unification transaction between the
Issuer and The ‘‘Shell’’ Transport and
Trading Company, p.l.c., and
recommending the public exchange
offer (‘‘Offer’’) by Royal Dutch Shell, plc
(‘‘Royal Dutch Shell’’) it was understood
that following completion of the Offer
that expired on July 18, 2005 and
depending on the level of acceptance,
Royal Dutch Shell intended to request
the Issuer to seek delisting of its shares.
It was noted that the Offer documents in
relation to the unification transaction
contemplated that Royal Dutch Shell
would request such delisting. Second,
the Committee also considered the
likely effects of delisting described in
the Offer documentation, including
reduced liquidity and the fact that the
Security in New York registry form
might no longer constitute ‘‘margin
securities.’’ Third, the Chairman of the
Committee informed the Committee that
this forecast regarding reduced liquidity
has proved accurate: trading volumes in
the Security have decreased on
Euronext Amsterdam and NYSE after
July 19, 2005. In this regard, the
Committee considered that should
interest exist in trading the Security, an
over-the-counter market might offer an
adequate market for trading the
Security. Fourth, furthermore, the
Committee considered that a liquid
market has developed and is being
maintained in shares in the Issuer’s
parent company, Royal Dutch Shell, on
the London Stock Exchange, Euronext
Amsterdam, and NYSE. The Committee
considered that these listings required
Royal Dutch Shell to comply with
listing rules and corporate governance
requirements, and therefore that
delisting of the Security from Euronext
Amsterdam and NYSE would not result
in investors in the Shell Group of
Companies, (‘‘Shell Group’’) no longer
benefiting from such corporate
governance requirements. The
Committee also noted that the proposed
delisting would not impair the ability of
investors interested in acquiring an
interest in the Shell Group to acquire
such an interest. Fifth, the Committee
also noted that Royal Dutch Shell has
publicly reserved the right to use any
legally permitted method to obtain
100% of the Security. Sixth, the
Committee also considered the cost of
the listing fees and administrative time
and expense associated with
maintaining listings. In view of the
factors noted above, the Committee
expressed its unanimous view that the
benefits of the Issuer to delist the
Security from both Euronext Amsterdam
and NYSE outweigh any disadvantages
VerDate Aug<18>2005
16:17 Sep 13, 2005
Jkt 205001
of such delisting for the remaining
minority shareholders.
The Issuer stated in its application
that it has complied with the rules of
NYSE by providing NYSE with the
required documents governing an
issuer’s voluntary withdrawal of a
security from listing and registration.
The Issuer’s application relates solely
to the withdrawal of the Security from
listing on NYSE and from registration
under Section 12(b) of the Act,3 and
shall not affect its obligation to be
registered under Section 12(g) of the
Act.4
Any interested person may, on or
before September 29, 2005 comment on
the facts bearing upon whether the
application has been made in
accordance with the rules of NYSE, and
what terms, if any, should be imposed
by the Commission for the protection of
investors. All comment letters may be
submitted by either of the following
methods:
Electronic Comments
• Send an e-mail to rulecomments@sec.gov. Please include the
File Number 1–03788 or;
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Jonathan G. Katz, Secretary,
Securities and Exchange Commission,
100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC
20549–9303.
All submissions should refer to File
Number 1–03788. This file number
should be included on the subject line
if e-mail is used. To help us process and
review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The
Commission will post all comments on
the Commission’s Internet Web site
(https://www.sec.gov/rules/delist.shtml).
Comments are also available for public
inspection and copying in the
Commission’s Public Reference Room.
All comments received will be posted
without change; we do not edit personal
identifying information from
submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make
available publicly.
The Commission, based on the
information submitted to it, will issue
an order granting the application after
the date mentioned above, unless the
Commission determines to order a
hearing on the matter.
3 15
4 15
PO 00000
U.S.C. 78l(b).
U.S.C. 78l(g).
Frm 00072
Fmt 4703
For the Commission, by the Division of
Market Regulation, pursuant to delegated
authority.5
Jonathan G. Katz,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E5–5004 Filed 9–13–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 35–28026]
Filings Under the Public Utility Holding
Company Act of 1935, as Amended
(‘‘Act’’)
September 8, 2005.
Notice is hereby given that the
following filing(s) has/have been made
with the Commission pursuant to
provisions of the Act and rules
promulgated under the Act. All
interested persons are referred to the
application(s) and/or declaration(s) for
complete statements of the proposed
transaction(s) summarized below. The
application(s) and/or declaration(s) and
any amendment(s) is/are available for
public inspection through the
Commission’s Branch of Public
Reference.
Interested persons wishing to
comment or request a hearing on the
application(s) and/or declaration(s)
should submit their views in writing by
October 3, 2005, to the Secretary,
Securities and Exchange Commission,
100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC
20549–9303, and serve a copy on the
relevant applicant(s) and/or declarant(s)
at the address(es) specified below. Proof
of service (by affidavit or, in the case of
an attorney at law, by certificate) should
be filed with the request. Any request
for hearing should identify specifically
the issues of facts or law that are
disputed. A person who so requests will
be notified of any hearing, if ordered,
and will receive a copy of any notice or
order issued in the matter. After October
3, 2005, the application(s) and/or
declaration(s), as filed or as amended,
may be granted and/or permitted to
become effective.
Ameren Corp., et al. (70–10078)
Ameren Corporation (‘‘Ameren’’), a
registered holding company, 1901
Chouteau Avenue, St. Louis, Missouri
63103, CILCORP Inc. (‘‘CILCORP’’), a
wholly owned exempt holding company
subsidiary of Ameren, AmernEnergy
Resources Generating Company
(‘‘AERG’’), a wholly owned indirect
electric utility company subsidiary of
Ameren, and CILCORP Investment
5 17
Sfmt 4703
54421
E:\FR\FM\14SEN1.SGM
CFR 200.30–3(a)(1).
14SEN1
54422
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 177 / Wednesday, September 14, 2005 / Notices
Management, Inc. (‘‘CIM’’) a wholly
owned direct nonutility subsidiary of
CILCORP, all at 300 Liberty Street,
Peoria, Illinois 61602, have filed an
application-declaration under sections
6(a), 7, 9(a),10, 11(b)(1), 12(b) and 12(f)
of the Act and rule 45 under the Act.
I. Background
A. The Ameren System
Ameren directly owns all of the
issued and outstanding common stock
of Union Electric Company, dba
‘‘AmerenUE,’’ Central Illinois Public
Service Company, dba ‘‘AmerenCIPS,’’
and Illinois Power Company dba
‘‘AmerenIP.’’ Additionally, through
CILCORP, Ameren owns all of the
issued and outstanding common stock
of Central Illinois Light Company, dba
‘‘AmerenCILCO.’’ AmerenCILCO also
holds all of the outstanding common
stock of AERG, an electric utility
generating subsidiary to which
AmerenCILCO transferred substantially
all of its generating assets in October
2003. Together, AmerenUE,
AmerenCIPS, AmerenIP and
AmerenCILCO provide retail and
wholesale electric service to
approximately 2.3 million customers
and retail natural gas service to
approximately 935,000 customers in
parts of Missouri and Illinois.
CIM holds investments in several
leasing transactions, including those
held through its wholly-owned
subsidiaries: CIM Air Leasing, Inc.
(‘‘CIM Air’’), CILCORP Lease
Management Inc. (‘‘CLM’’), CIM
Leasing, Inc. (‘‘CIM Leasing’’) and CIM
Energy Investments, Inc. (‘‘CIM
Energy’’). CIM also owns interests in the
following partnerships: Midwest
Corporate Tax Credit Fund, LP; Midwest
Corporate Tax Credit Fund II, LP;
Provident Tax Credit Fund III, LP;
Illinois Equity Fund 1992 Limited
Partnership; Illinois Equity Fund 1994
Limited Partnership; Illinois Equity
Fund 1996 Limited Partnership; and
Illinois Equity Fund 1998 Limited
Partnership (collectively, ‘‘Housing
Credit Partnerships’’).
B. Past Orders
By order dated January 29, 2003,
(HCAR No. 27645, ‘‘Initial Order’’), the
Commission authorized Ameren to
acquire all of the issued and outstanding
common stock of CILCORP. Ameren
completed the acquisition of CILCORP
on January 31, 2003. In the Initial Order,
the Commission reserved jurisdiction
over Ameren’s retention of certain
indirect non-utility subsidiaries and
investments of CILCORP under section
VerDate Aug<18>2005
16:17 Sep 13, 2005
Jkt 205001
11(b)(1) of the Act, including the
following:
• CIM’s 40% interest—held by CIM
Air through a grantor trust—in Freighter
Express Partners (‘‘FEP’’), which owns a
commercial aircraft that is leased to an
unrelated third party under an
agreement dated as of October 1, 1993
and subject to non-recourse lease debt
(‘‘FEP Partnership Interest’’).
• CIM’s 100% interest—held by CIM
Leasing through a grantor trust—in
passenger railcars that are leased to an
unrelated third party under an
agreement dated as of September 1,
1993 and subject to non-recourse lease
debt (‘‘Railcars Interest’’).
• CLM’s 7.4257% interest—held
through a grantor trust—in Unit No. 1 of
the Springerville Power Plant, which is
leased to an unrelated third party under
an agreement dated December 15, 1986
and subject to non-recourse lease debt
(‘‘Power Plant Interest’’).
• CLM’s 49.9% interest—held by two
wholly-owned subsidiaries, CLM Inc.,
IV (‘‘CLM IV’’) and CLM XII, Inc. (‘‘CLM
XII’’)—in D.C.L. Leasing Partners
Limited Partnership, Ltd.–IV (‘‘DCL
IV’’), which owns an office building in
California that is leased to an unrelated
third party under an agreement dated
November 10, 1982 and subject to a
mortgage (the ‘‘California Office
Building Interest’’).
• CLM’s 49.9% interest in D.C.L.
Leasing Partners Limited Partnership,
Ltd.–VI (‘‘DCL VI’’), which owns an
office building in Delaware that is
leased to an unrelated third party under
an agreement dated April 1, 1984 and
subject to a mortgage (‘‘Delaware Office
Building Interest’’). CLM XI, Inc. (‘‘CLM
XI’’) and CLM Inc., VI (‘‘CLM VI’’), each
a wholly owned subsidiary of CLM X,
Inc. (‘‘CLM X’’), together own the
Delaware Office Building Interest. CLM
X is a wholly-owned subsidiary of CLM.
• CLM’s 14.95016611% interest—
held by CLM VI through a grantor
trust—in a waste-to-energy electric
generating facility that is leased to an
unrelated third party under an
agreement dated July 21, 1997 and
subject to non-recourse lease debt
(‘‘Generation Facility Interest’’).
• CLM’s 50% interest—held by CLM
Inc.—VII (‘‘CLM VII’’) and CLM Inc.—
VIII (‘‘CLM VIII’’), each a wholly owned
subsidiary of CLM, through a grantor
trust—in 24 commercial real estate
properties, each of which is leased to an
unrelated third party under an
agreement dated as of December 1, 1986
and subject to non-recourse lease debt
(‘‘Commercial Real Estate Interest’’).
The Railcars Interest, the Power Plant
Interest, and the Generation Facility
Interest are referred to as the
PO 00000
Frm 00073
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
‘‘Equipment Interests;’’ the FEP
Partnership Interest, the California
Office Building Interest, the Delaware
Office Building Interest, and the
Commercial Real Estate Interest are
referred to as the ‘‘Non-Equipment
Interests;’’ the Equipment Interests and
the Non-Equipment Interests are
together referred to as the ‘‘Lease
Interests.’’
By order dated April 15, 2004, (HCAR
No. 27835, ‘‘Supplemental Order’’), the
Commission determined that certain
nonutility interests and investments—
referred to as the ‘‘Non-Retainable
Interests’’—of CILCORP, including the
Lease Interests described above, are not
retainable by Ameren under the
standards of section 11(b)(1) of the Act.
The Supplemental Order requires that
Ameren cause CIM or any subsidiary to
sell or otherwise dispose of the NonRetainable Interests not later than
January 31, 2006. Ameren committed
that, within 24 months of receipt, it
would either: (1) Expend the net
proceeds from any sale or disposition of
a Non-Retainable Interest to either retire
or cancel securities representing
indebtedness of the transferor or
otherwise purchase property other than
‘‘nonexempt property’’ within the
meaning of section 1083 of the Internal
Revenue Code of 1986, as amended
(‘‘Code’’); or (2) invest such amount as
a contribution to the capital, or as paidin surplus, of another direct or indirect
subsidiary of Ameren in a manner that
satisfies the non-recognition provisions
of Code section 1081.
C. Summary of Relevant Provisions of
the Code
Code section 1081(b)(1) provides for
the non-recognition of gain or loss from
a sale or exchange of property made to
comply with a Commission order. Code
section 1082(a)(2) requires that any
unrecognized gain under Code section
1081(b)(1) be applied to reduce the basis
of the transferor’s remaining assets in a
specified manner.
An exception from this nonrecognition treatment exists under Code
section 1081(b)(1) where certain
‘‘nonexempt property’’ is received by
the transferor. If any ‘‘nonexempt
property’’ is received,1 the gain must be
recognized unless, within 24 months of
the transfer, the ‘‘nonexempt property’’
is expended for property other than
‘‘nonexempt property’’ or invested in
accordance with Code section 1081(b)(2)
and the Commission’s order recites that
1 Under section 1083(e) of the Code, ‘‘nonexempt
property’’ is defined to include, among other things,
cash indebtedness of the transferor that is cancelled
or assumed by the purchaser in the exchange.
E:\FR\FM\14SEN1.SGM
14SEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 177 / Wednesday, September 14, 2005 / Notices
such expenditure or investment is
necessary or appropriate to the
integration or simplification of the
transferor’s holding company system.
Code section 1081(b)(3) provides that an
appropriate expenditure for property
other than ‘‘nonexempt property’’ for
purposes of Code section 1081(b)(2)
includes each of: (1) A payment in
complete or partial retirement or
cancellation of securities representing
indebtedness of the transferor; and (2)
the amount of any liability of the
transferor that is assumed (or to which
transferred property is subject) in
connection with any transfer of property
in obedience to a Commission order.
Code section 1081(d) provides for the
non-recognition of gain or loss from
certain inter-company transactions
within the same system group if such
transactions are effected to comply with
a Commission order.
D. Sale of the Lease Interests
CILCORP states that it intends to enter
into one or more definitive agreements
to sell all of the Lease Interests. The sale
of the Lease Interests would result in a
significant amount of gain for Federal
income tax purposes. Ameren would
structure the sale transaction(s) in a
manner that would enable it to utilize
the non-recognition provisions of Code
section 1081, as contemplated by the
Supplemental Order. To achieve this
result, Ameren would cause CILCORP,
CIM, and certain of its other direct and
indirect subsidiaries (as described
below) to engage in a series of
essentially simultaneous inter-company
transactions the purposes of which
would be: (1) To transfer certain
investments of CIM that are not among
the Non-Retainable Interests (and are
thus not part of the assets being sold) to
other direct or indirect subsidiaries of
Ameren; and (2) to structure the sale(s)
of the Lease Interests to occur from a
subsidiary or subsidiaries of Ameren
with sufficient tax basis in similar
classes of property to absorb the basis
reductions required by Code section
1082(b).
More specifically, to comply with the
Supplemental Order, Ameren and its
subsidiaries intend to engage in the
following transactions (collectively,
‘‘Proposed Transactions’’):
1. On or prior to the earliest closing date
with respect to the sale(s) of any or all of the
Lease Interests (‘‘Closing Date’’), Ameren
Energy Resources Company (‘‘Resources’’),
an intermediate subsidiary that is owned
directly by Ameren, would contribute the
stock of certain of its direct nonutility
subsidiaries to Ameren Energy Development
VerDate Aug<18>2005
16:17 Sep 13, 2005
Jkt 205001
Company (‘‘Development’’),2 which is also a
direct wholly-owned nonutility subsidiary of
Resources.
2. On or prior to the Closing Date: (a) CIM
would distribute the stock of CIM Energy to
CILCORP; (b) CIM would transfer its interests
in the Housing Credit Partnerships to an
affiliated entity by a combination of
distributions and contributions; and (c) CIM
Leasing would transfer its interest in
SunAmerica 51 to an affiliated entity by a
combination of distributions and
contributions.
3. On or prior to the Closing Date, CLM VI
would distribute the Generation Facility
Interest to CLM X, and CLM X would
distribute the Generation Facility Interest to
CLM. On or prior to the Closing Date, CLM
would distribute the Power Plant Interest and
the Generation Facility Interest to CIM, and
CIM would contribute the Power Plant
Interest and the Generation Facility Interest
to CIM Leasing.
4. On or prior to the Closing Date, CIM
would transfer the stock of CIM Leasing to
AERG in exchange for a promissory note
(‘‘AERG Note’’) and possibly cash (together
with the AERG Note, ‘‘AERG
Consideration’’).
5. On or prior to the Closing Date, CIM
would distribute the AERG Consideration to
CILCORP.
6. On or prior to the Closing Date,
CILCORP would transfer the stock of CIM to
Resources in exchange for a promissory note
(‘‘Resources Note’’) and possibly cash
(together with the Resources Note,
‘‘Resources Consideration’’).
7. On or prior to the Closing Date, Ameren
would cause each of CIM Air, CLM, CIM
Leasing, CLM IV, CLM VI, CLM VII, CLM
VIII, CLM X, CLM XI, and CLM XII to convert
into Delaware limited liability companies
and would cause CIM to convert into an
Illinois limited liability company.3
8. On the closing date with respect to the
applicable Lease Interests, AERG would sell
the CIM Leasing membership interest and/or
any of the Equipment Interests to a buyer or
buyers, in each case in exchange for cash,
which would be treated for federal income
tax purposes as a deemed sale of the
Equipment Interests.
9. On the closing date with respect to the
applicable Lease Interests, Resources would
sell the CIM membership interest and/or any
of the Non-Equipment Interests to a buyer or
buyers, in each case in exchange for cash,
which would be treated for federal income
tax purposes as a deemed sale of the NonEquipment Interests.
2 Resources would contribute to Development the
stock that it holds in Illinois Materials Supply Co.,
Ameren Energy Marketing Company, and Ameren
Energy Fuels and Services Company, which are
‘‘energy-related companies’’ under rule 58, and
Electric Energy, Inc. and AmerenEnergy Medina
Valley Cogen (No. 4), which are ‘‘exempt wholesale
generators’’ under section 32 of the Act. By order
dated December 18, 2003 (HCAR No. 27777,
‘‘December 2003 Order’’), the Commission
authorized Ameren to reorganize its ownership
interest in exempt and nonexempt nonutility
subsidiaries under intermediate subsidiaries.
3 By the December 2003 Order, the Commission
authorized Ameren to convert its nonutility
subsidiaries from one business form to another.
PO 00000
Frm 00074
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
54423
10. On the closing date with respect to the
applicable Lease Interests, or within 24
months after that date, AERG would expend
the cash received from the buyer(s) to reduce
the AERG Note or would otherwise expend
or invest such cash in accordance with Code
section 1081(b).
11. On the closing date with respect to the
applicable Lease Interests, or within 24
months after that date, Resources would
expend the cash received from the buyer(s)
to reduce the Resources Note.4
Applicants state that the Proposed
Transactions are intended in part to
allow Ameren to match the
unrecognized gain from the sale of the
Lease Interests under Code section
1081(b) to certain subsidiaries of
Ameren that have a sufficiently high tax
basis in other similar classes of property
so that the unrecognized gain can be
fully absorbed by the basis reductions
required by Code section 1082(a)(2).5
II. Requests for Authority
Applicants request that the
Commission modify the Supplemental
Order to eliminate the deadline (January
31, 2006) by which Ameren must
complete the sale or other disposition of
the Non-Retainable Interests.
Applicants request authority for: (1)
AERG to issue the AERG Note (in
consideration for the stock of CIM
Leasing); (2) CIM to acquire the AERG
Note; and (3) AERG to acquire of the
stock of CIM Leasing.
In addition, in accordance with Code
section 1081(f) and the Supplemental
Order, Ameren requests that the
Commission issue a further
supplemental order in this proceeding
confirming that: (1) The proposed
disposition of the Lease Interests
through the Proposed Transactions
would be a disposition for cash or cash
equivalents in compliance with the
Supplemental Order; (2) the application
of the net proceeds to retire all or part
of the AERG Note and the Resources
Note would be a complete or partial
retirement of securities representing
indebtedness of AERG and Resources;
(3) the amount of liabilities assumed
and the amount of liabilities to which
transferred property is subject upon the
disposition of the Lease Interests
through the Proposed Transactions
4 Applicants expect that the AERG Note and the
Resources Note would be retired on or shortly after
the latest applicable closing date.
5 Ameren has requested that the Internal Revenue
Service issue a private letter ruling confirming the
federal income tax consequences of the Proposed
Transactions. Applicants state that it is possible
that the Internal Revenue Service may require
Ameren to modify the Proposed Transactions to
obtain the private letter ruling. The Proposed
Transactions would include any IRS-required
modification, to the extent the modification allows
Ameren to comply with the Supplemental Order
and is otherwise acceptable to Ameren.
E:\FR\FM\14SEN1.SGM
14SEN1
54424
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 177 / Wednesday, September 14, 2005 / Notices
would be an expenditure for property
other than ‘‘nonexempt property’’ in
compliance with the Supplemental
Order; and (4) accordingly, each of the
Proposed Transactions is necessary or
appropriate to the integration or
simplification of the Ameren holding
company system and would effectuate
the provisions of section 11(b)(1) of the
Act, , and will be made in obedience to
the supplemental order and the further
supplemental order in this proceeding.
For the Commission by the Division of
Investment Management, pursuant to
delegated authority.
Jonathan G. Katz,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E5–5013 Filed 9–13–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–52375; File No. SR–CHX–
2005–21]
Self-Regulatory Organizations;
Chicago Stock Exchange, Inc.; Notice
of Filing of Proposed Rule Change and
Amendments No. 1 and 2 Thereto
Requiring Its Participants To Provide
Electronic Mail Addresses to the
Exchange
September 1, 2005.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on July 18,
2005, the Chicago Stock Exchange, Inc.
(‘‘CHX’’ or ‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission
(‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule
change as described in Items I, II and III
below, which Items have been prepared
by the CHX. On August 30, 2005, the
Exchange filed Amendment No. 1 to the
proposed rule change.3 On September 1,
2005, the Exchange filed Amendment
No. 2 to the proposed rule change.4 The
Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule
change from interested persons.
1 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
CFR 240.19b–4.
3 In Amendment No. 1, the Exchange made
several minor clarifications to the proposed rule
change, including changes to the proposed rule text
to require members to promptly update electronic
mail addresses they provide to the Exchange, to
clarify that the proposal will not supersede or
modify any other provisions of Exchange rules that
set out a specific method for the receipt of
information from the Exchange, and to modify Part
II.A.1 to more closely conform it to the text of the
proposed rule change.
4 In Amendment No. 2, the Exchange changed the
text of the proposed rule so that it uses the term
‘‘electronic mail’’ instead of the term ‘‘e-mail.’’
2 17
VerDate Aug<18>2005
16:17 Sep 13, 2005
Jkt 205001
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to amend the
text of its proposed new Rule 17, in
Article III of the Exchange’s Rules,
which would require participants and
participant firms to provide electronic
mail addresses to the Exchange for use
in transmitting notices and other
communications. Specifically, the
Exchange proposes to (1) amend the text
to require that participants and
participant firms promptly update any
electronic mail addresses provided to
the Exchange when the addresses
change or are no longer valid; and (2)
amend the text to confirm that the
proposal does not supersede or modify,
in addition to specific provisions
relating to the service of process or other
materials in disciplinary proceedings,
any other provisions of Exchange rules
that set out a specific method for the
receipt of information from the
Exchange. The text of this proposed rule
is available on the Exchange’s Web site
at https://www.chx.com/rules/
proposed_rules_htm and in the
Commission’s Public Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
CHX included statements concerning
the purpose of and basis for the
proposed rule change and discussed any
comments it received regarding the
proposal. The text of these statements
may be examined at the places specified
in Item IV below. The CHX has prepared
summaries, set forth in sections A, B
and C below, of the most significant
aspects of such statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
1. Purpose
The Exchange recently submitted a
proposal to add a new Rule 17 to Article
III of the Exchange’s Rules to require
each participant and participant firm to
provide the Exchange with an electronic
mail address that the Exchange may use
to distribute notices and
communications. The proposal is
designed to allow the Exchange to take
advantage of technology to
communicate with participants in a
more efficient and cost-effective
manner, for routine communications as
well as in appropriate emergency
situations. Among other things, the
Exchange anticipates that it would be
PO 00000
Frm 00075
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
able to provide participants with
electronic copies of the weekly bulletin,
which today are mailed to many of the
Exchange’s participants in hard copies.
Importantly, the original version of
the Exchange’s proposed rule change
specifically noted that it does not
modify or supersede any rule that sets
out a different method of service
required as part of a disciplinary
proceeding. Those materials would
continue to be provided by the more
conventional means set out in the
rules.5 The Exchange now proposes to
amend the proposed rule text to (1)
require participants and participant
firms to promptly update any electronic
mail addresses provided to the
Exchange when the addresses change or
are no longer valid; and (2) confirm that
the proposal does not supersede or
modify any other provisions of
Exchange rules that set out a specific
method for the receipt of information
from the Exchange.
2. Statutory Basis
The CHX believes the proposal is
consistent with Section 6(b) of the Act,6
in general, and furthers the objectives of
Section 6(b)(5) of the Act,7 in particular,
in that it promotes just and equitable
principles of trade, removes
impediments to, and perfects the
mechanism of, a free and open market
and a national market system, and, in
general, protects investors and the
public interest by allowing the
Exchange to take advantage of available
technology to communicate with its
participants in a more efficient and costeffective manner.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that
the proposed rule change will impose
any burden on competition.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Changes Received From
Members, Participants or Others
No written comments were either
solicited or received.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Changes and Timing for
Commission Action
Within 35 days of the date of
publication of this notice in the Federal
Register or within such other period (i)
as the Commission may designate up to
90 days of such date if it finds such
longer period to be appropriate and
5 See Article XII (‘‘Discipline and Trial
Proceedings’’).
6 15 U.S.C. 78(f)(b).
7 15 U.S.C. 78(f)(b)(5).
E:\FR\FM\14SEN1.SGM
14SEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 177 (Wednesday, September 14, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 54421-54424]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E5-5013]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 35-28026]
Filings Under the Public Utility Holding Company Act of 1935, as
Amended (``Act'')
September 8, 2005.
Notice is hereby given that the following filing(s) has/have been
made with the Commission pursuant to provisions of the Act and rules
promulgated under the Act. All interested persons are referred to the
application(s) and/or declaration(s) for complete statements of the
proposed transaction(s) summarized below. The application(s) and/or
declaration(s) and any amendment(s) is/are available for public
inspection through the Commission's Branch of Public Reference.
Interested persons wishing to comment or request a hearing on the
application(s) and/or declaration(s) should submit their views in
writing by October 3, 2005, to the Secretary, Securities and Exchange
Commission, 100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC 20549-9303, and serve a
copy on the relevant applicant(s) and/or declarant(s) at the
address(es) specified below. Proof of service (by affidavit or, in the
case of an attorney at law, by certificate) should be filed with the
request. Any request for hearing should identify specifically the
issues of facts or law that are disputed. A person who so requests will
be notified of any hearing, if ordered, and will receive a copy of any
notice or order issued in the matter. After October 3, 2005, the
application(s) and/or declaration(s), as filed or as amended, may be
granted and/or permitted to become effective.
Ameren Corp., et al. (70-10078)
Ameren Corporation (``Ameren''), a registered holding company, 1901
Chouteau Avenue, St. Louis, Missouri 63103, CILCORP Inc. (``CILCORP''),
a wholly owned exempt holding company subsidiary of Ameren, AmernEnergy
Resources Generating Company (``AERG''), a wholly owned indirect
electric utility company subsidiary of Ameren, and CILCORP Investment
[[Page 54422]]
Management, Inc. (``CIM'') a wholly owned direct nonutility subsidiary
of CILCORP, all at 300 Liberty Street, Peoria, Illinois 61602, have
filed an application-declaration under sections 6(a), 7, 9(a),10,
11(b)(1), 12(b) and 12(f) of the Act and rule 45 under the Act.
I. Background
A. The Ameren System
Ameren directly owns all of the issued and outstanding common stock
of Union Electric Company, dba ``AmerenUE,'' Central Illinois Public
Service Company, dba ``AmerenCIPS,'' and Illinois Power Company dba
``AmerenIP.'' Additionally, through CILCORP, Ameren owns all of the
issued and outstanding common stock of Central Illinois Light Company,
dba ``AmerenCILCO.'' AmerenCILCO also holds all of the outstanding
common stock of AERG, an electric utility generating subsidiary to
which AmerenCILCO transferred substantially all of its generating
assets in October 2003. Together, AmerenUE, AmerenCIPS, AmerenIP and
AmerenCILCO provide retail and wholesale electric service to
approximately 2.3 million customers and retail natural gas service to
approximately 935,000 customers in parts of Missouri and Illinois.
CIM holds investments in several leasing transactions, including
those held through its wholly-owned subsidiaries: CIM Air Leasing, Inc.
(``CIM Air''), CILCORP Lease Management Inc. (``CLM''), CIM Leasing,
Inc. (``CIM Leasing'') and CIM Energy Investments, Inc. (``CIM
Energy''). CIM also owns interests in the following partnerships:
Midwest Corporate Tax Credit Fund, LP; Midwest Corporate Tax Credit
Fund II, LP; Provident Tax Credit Fund III, LP; Illinois Equity Fund
1992 Limited Partnership; Illinois Equity Fund 1994 Limited
Partnership; Illinois Equity Fund 1996 Limited Partnership; and
Illinois Equity Fund 1998 Limited Partnership (collectively, ``Housing
Credit Partnerships'').
B. Past Orders
By order dated January 29, 2003, (HCAR No. 27645, ``Initial
Order''), the Commission authorized Ameren to acquire all of the issued
and outstanding common stock of CILCORP. Ameren completed the
acquisition of CILCORP on January 31, 2003. In the Initial Order, the
Commission reserved jurisdiction over Ameren's retention of certain
indirect non-utility subsidiaries and investments of CILCORP under
section 11(b)(1) of the Act, including the following:
CIM's 40% interest--held by CIM Air through a grantor
trust--in Freighter Express Partners (``FEP''), which owns a commercial
aircraft that is leased to an unrelated third party under an agreement
dated as of October 1, 1993 and subject to non-recourse lease debt
(``FEP Partnership Interest'').
CIM's 100% interest--held by CIM Leasing through a grantor
trust--in passenger railcars that are leased to an unrelated third
party under an agreement dated as of September 1, 1993 and subject to
non-recourse lease debt (``Railcars Interest'').
CLM's 7.4257% interest--held through a grantor trust--in
Unit No. 1 of the Springerville Power Plant, which is leased to an
unrelated third party under an agreement dated December 15, 1986 and
subject to non-recourse lease debt (``Power Plant Interest'').
CLM's 49.9% interest--held by two wholly-owned
subsidiaries, CLM Inc., IV (``CLM IV'') and CLM XII, Inc. (``CLM
XII'')--in D.C.L. Leasing Partners Limited Partnership, Ltd.-IV (``DCL
IV''), which owns an office building in California that is leased to an
unrelated third party under an agreement dated November 10, 1982 and
subject to a mortgage (the ``California Office Building Interest'').
CLM's 49.9% interest in D.C.L. Leasing Partners Limited
Partnership, Ltd.-VI (``DCL VI''), which owns an office building in
Delaware that is leased to an unrelated third party under an agreement
dated April 1, 1984 and subject to a mortgage (``Delaware Office
Building Interest''). CLM XI, Inc. (``CLM XI'') and CLM Inc., VI (``CLM
VI''), each a wholly owned subsidiary of CLM X, Inc. (``CLM X''),
together own the Delaware Office Building Interest. CLM X is a wholly-
owned subsidiary of CLM.
CLM's 14.95016611% interest--held by CLM VI through a
grantor trust--in a waste-to-energy electric generating facility that
is leased to an unrelated third party under an agreement dated July 21,
1997 and subject to non-recourse lease debt (``Generation Facility
Interest'').
CLM's 50% interest--held by CLM Inc.--VII (``CLM VII'')
and CLM Inc.--VIII (``CLM VIII''), each a wholly owned subsidiary of
CLM, through a grantor trust--in 24 commercial real estate properties,
each of which is leased to an unrelated third party under an agreement
dated as of December 1, 1986 and subject to non-recourse lease debt
(``Commercial Real Estate Interest'').
The Railcars Interest, the Power Plant Interest, and the Generation
Facility Interest are referred to as the ``Equipment Interests;'' the
FEP Partnership Interest, the California Office Building Interest, the
Delaware Office Building Interest, and the Commercial Real Estate
Interest are referred to as the ``Non-Equipment Interests;'' the
Equipment Interests and the Non-Equipment Interests are together
referred to as the ``Lease Interests.''
By order dated April 15, 2004, (HCAR No. 27835, ``Supplemental
Order''), the Commission determined that certain nonutility interests
and investments--referred to as the ``Non-Retainable Interests''--of
CILCORP, including the Lease Interests described above, are not
retainable by Ameren under the standards of section 11(b)(1) of the
Act. The Supplemental Order requires that Ameren cause CIM or any
subsidiary to sell or otherwise dispose of the Non-Retainable Interests
not later than January 31, 2006. Ameren committed that, within 24
months of receipt, it would either: (1) Expend the net proceeds from
any sale or disposition of a Non-Retainable Interest to either retire
or cancel securities representing indebtedness of the transferor or
otherwise purchase property other than ``nonexempt property'' within
the meaning of section 1083 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as
amended (``Code''); or (2) invest such amount as a contribution to the
capital, or as paid-in surplus, of another direct or indirect
subsidiary of Ameren in a manner that satisfies the non-recognition
provisions of Code section 1081.
C. Summary of Relevant Provisions of the Code
Code section 1081(b)(1) provides for the non-recognition of gain or
loss from a sale or exchange of property made to comply with a
Commission order. Code section 1082(a)(2) requires that any
unrecognized gain under Code section 1081(b)(1) be applied to reduce
the basis of the transferor's remaining assets in a specified manner.
An exception from this non-recognition treatment exists under Code
section 1081(b)(1) where certain ``nonexempt property'' is received by
the transferor. If any ``nonexempt property'' is received,\1\ the gain
must be recognized unless, within 24 months of the transfer, the
``nonexempt property'' is expended for property other than ``nonexempt
property'' or invested in accordance with Code section 1081(b)(2) and
the Commission's order recites that
[[Page 54423]]
such expenditure or investment is necessary or appropriate to the
integration or simplification of the transferor's holding company
system. Code section 1081(b)(3) provides that an appropriate
expenditure for property other than ``nonexempt property'' for purposes
of Code section 1081(b)(2) includes each of: (1) A payment in complete
or partial retirement or cancellation of securities representing
indebtedness of the transferor; and (2) the amount of any liability of
the transferor that is assumed (or to which transferred property is
subject) in connection with any transfer of property in obedience to a
Commission order.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Under section 1083(e) of the Code, ``nonexempt property'' is
defined to include, among other things, cash indebtedness of the
transferor that is cancelled or assumed by the purchaser in the
exchange.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Code section 1081(d) provides for the non-recognition of gain or
loss from certain inter-company transactions within the same system
group if such transactions are effected to comply with a Commission
order.
D. Sale of the Lease Interests
CILCORP states that it intends to enter into one or more definitive
agreements to sell all of the Lease Interests. The sale of the Lease
Interests would result in a significant amount of gain for Federal
income tax purposes. Ameren would structure the sale transaction(s) in
a manner that would enable it to utilize the non-recognition provisions
of Code section 1081, as contemplated by the Supplemental Order. To
achieve this result, Ameren would cause CILCORP, CIM, and certain of
its other direct and indirect subsidiaries (as described below) to
engage in a series of essentially simultaneous inter-company
transactions the purposes of which would be: (1) To transfer certain
investments of CIM that are not among the Non-Retainable Interests (and
are thus not part of the assets being sold) to other direct or indirect
subsidiaries of Ameren; and (2) to structure the sale(s) of the Lease
Interests to occur from a subsidiary or subsidiaries of Ameren with
sufficient tax basis in similar classes of property to absorb the basis
reductions required by Code section 1082(b).
More specifically, to comply with the Supplemental Order, Ameren
and its subsidiaries intend to engage in the following transactions
(collectively, ``Proposed Transactions''):
1. On or prior to the earliest closing date with respect to the
sale(s) of any or all of the Lease Interests (``Closing Date''),
Ameren Energy Resources Company (``Resources''), an intermediate
subsidiary that is owned directly by Ameren, would contribute the
stock of certain of its direct nonutility subsidiaries to Ameren
Energy Development Company (``Development''),\2\ which is also a
direct wholly-owned nonutility subsidiary of Resources.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ Resources would contribute to Development the stock that it
holds in Illinois Materials Supply Co., Ameren Energy Marketing
Company, and Ameren Energy Fuels and Services Company, which are
``energy-related companies'' under rule 58, and Electric Energy,
Inc. and AmerenEnergy Medina Valley Cogen (No. 4), which are
``exempt wholesale generators'' under section 32 of the Act. By
order dated December 18, 2003 (HCAR No. 27777, ``December 2003
Order''), the Commission authorized Ameren to reorganize its
ownership interest in exempt and nonexempt nonutility subsidiaries
under intermediate subsidiaries.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. On or prior to the Closing Date: (a) CIM would distribute the
stock of CIM Energy to CILCORP; (b) CIM would transfer its interests
in the Housing Credit Partnerships to an affiliated entity by a
combination of distributions and contributions; and (c) CIM Leasing
would transfer its interest in SunAmerica 51 to an affiliated entity
by a combination of distributions and contributions.
3. On or prior to the Closing Date, CLM VI would distribute the
Generation Facility Interest to CLM X, and CLM X would distribute
the Generation Facility Interest to CLM. On or prior to the Closing
Date, CLM would distribute the Power Plant Interest and the
Generation Facility Interest to CIM, and CIM would contribute the
Power Plant Interest and the Generation Facility Interest to CIM
Leasing.
4. On or prior to the Closing Date, CIM would transfer the stock
of CIM Leasing to AERG in exchange for a promissory note (``AERG
Note'') and possibly cash (together with the AERG Note, ``AERG
Consideration'').
5. On or prior to the Closing Date, CIM would distribute the
AERG Consideration to CILCORP.
6. On or prior to the Closing Date, CILCORP would transfer the
stock of CIM to Resources in exchange for a promissory note
(``Resources Note'') and possibly cash (together with the Resources
Note, ``Resources Consideration'').
7. On or prior to the Closing Date, Ameren would cause each of
CIM Air, CLM, CIM Leasing, CLM IV, CLM VI, CLM VII, CLM VIII, CLM X,
CLM XI, and CLM XII to convert into Delaware limited liability
companies and would cause CIM to convert into an Illinois limited
liability company.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ By the December 2003 Order, the Commission authorized Ameren
to convert its nonutility subsidiaries from one business form to
another.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
8. On the closing date with respect to the applicable Lease
Interests, AERG would sell the CIM Leasing membership interest and/
or any of the Equipment Interests to a buyer or buyers, in each case
in exchange for cash, which would be treated for federal income tax
purposes as a deemed sale of the Equipment Interests.
9. On the closing date with respect to the applicable Lease
Interests, Resources would sell the CIM membership interest and/or
any of the Non-Equipment Interests to a buyer or buyers, in each
case in exchange for cash, which would be treated for federal income
tax purposes as a deemed sale of the Non-Equipment Interests.
10. On the closing date with respect to the applicable Lease
Interests, or within 24 months after that date, AERG would expend
the cash received from the buyer(s) to reduce the AERG Note or would
otherwise expend or invest such cash in accordance with Code section
1081(b).
11. On the closing date with respect to the applicable Lease
Interests, or within 24 months after that date, Resources would
expend the cash received from the buyer(s) to reduce the Resources
Note.\4\
\4\ Applicants expect that the AERG Note and the Resources Note
would be retired on or shortly after the latest applicable closing
date.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Applicants state that the Proposed Transactions are intended in
part to allow Ameren to match the unrecognized gain from the sale of
the Lease Interests under Code section 1081(b) to certain subsidiaries
of Ameren that have a sufficiently high tax basis in other similar
classes of property so that the unrecognized gain can be fully absorbed
by the basis reductions required by Code section 1082(a)(2).\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ Ameren has requested that the Internal Revenue Service issue
a private letter ruling confirming the federal income tax
consequences of the Proposed Transactions. Applicants state that it
is possible that the Internal Revenue Service may require Ameren to
modify the Proposed Transactions to obtain the private letter
ruling. The Proposed Transactions would include any IRS-required
modification, to the extent the modification allows Ameren to comply
with the Supplemental Order and is otherwise acceptable to Ameren.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
II. Requests for Authority
Applicants request that the Commission modify the Supplemental
Order to eliminate the deadline (January 31, 2006) by which Ameren must
complete the sale or other disposition of the Non-Retainable Interests.
Applicants request authority for: (1) AERG to issue the AERG Note
(in consideration for the stock of CIM Leasing); (2) CIM to acquire the
AERG Note; and (3) AERG to acquire of the stock of CIM Leasing.
In addition, in accordance with Code section 1081(f) and the
Supplemental Order, Ameren requests that the Commission issue a further
supplemental order in this proceeding confirming that: (1) The proposed
disposition of the Lease Interests through the Proposed Transactions
would be a disposition for cash or cash equivalents in compliance with
the Supplemental Order; (2) the application of the net proceeds to
retire all or part of the AERG Note and the Resources Note would be a
complete or partial retirement of securities representing indebtedness
of AERG and Resources; (3) the amount of liabilities assumed and the
amount of liabilities to which transferred property is subject upon the
disposition of the Lease Interests through the Proposed Transactions
[[Page 54424]]
would be an expenditure for property other than ``nonexempt property''
in compliance with the Supplemental Order; and (4) accordingly, each of
the Proposed Transactions is necessary or appropriate to the
integration or simplification of the Ameren holding company system and
would effectuate the provisions of section 11(b)(1) of the Act, , and
will be made in obedience to the supplemental order and the further
supplemental order in this proceeding.
For the Commission by the Division of Investment Management,
pursuant to delegated authority.
Jonathan G. Katz,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E5-5013 Filed 9-13-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-P