Certain In-shell Pistachios from the Islamic Republic of Iran: Final Results of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review, 54027-54028 [E5-4994]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 176 / Tuesday, September 13, 2005 / Notices
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
(C–507–501)
Certain In–shell Pistachios from the
Islamic Republic of Iran: Final Results
of Countervailing Duty Administrative
Review
Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On April 7, 2005, the
Department of Commerce (the
Department) published in the Federal
Register its preliminary results in the
countervailing duty (CVD)
administrative review of certain in–shell
pistachios from Iran. See Certain In–
shell Pistachios from the Islamic
Republic of Iran: Preliminary Results of
Countervailing Duty Administrative
Review, 70 FR 17653 (Preliminary
Results). The Department has now
completed this administrative review in
accordance with section 751(a) of the
Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act).
Based on information received since
the Preliminary Results and our analysis
of the comments received, the
Department has not revised the net
subsidy rate for Tehran Negah Nima
Trading Company, Inc., trading as Nima
Trading Company (Nima), the
respondent company in this proceeding.
For further discussion of our positions,
see the ‘‘Issues and Decision
Memorandum’’ from Barbara E. Tillman,
Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for
Import Administration, to Joseph A.
Spetrini, Acting Assistant Secretary for
Import Administration, concerning the
‘‘Final Results of Countervailing Duty
Administrative Review: Certain In–Shell
Pistachios from the Islamic Republic of
Iran’’ (Decision Memorandum) dated
September 6, 2005. The final net
subsidy rate for the reviewed company
is listed below in the section entitled
‘‘Final Results of Review.’’
EFFECTIVE DATE: September 13, 2005.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Darla Brown, AD/CVD Operations,
Office 3, Import Administration, U.S.
Department of Commerce, Room 4012,
14th Street and Constitution Avenue,
NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone:
(202) 482–2786.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
AGENCY:
Background
On April 7, 2005, the Department
published in the Federal Register its
Preliminary Results. We invited
interested parties to comment on these
results. Since the preliminary results,
the following events have occurred.
VerDate Aug<18>2005
16:06 Sep 12, 2005
Jkt 205001
On May 9, 2005, petitioners1
submitted a request for a public hearing.
On June 24, 2005, we received case
briefs from petitioners and Nima. On
July 1, 2005, we received rebuttal briefs
from petitioners and Nima. On July 25,
2005, Nima informed the Department
that it would not be participating in the
hearing. On August 11, 2005, the
Department extended the time limit for
the completion of its final results until
September 6, 2005. See Certain In–Shell
Pistachios from the Islamic Republic of
Iran: Extension of Time Limit for Final
Results of Countervailing Duty
Administrative Review, 70 FR 46814
(August 11, 2005). On August 15, 2005,
a public hearing was held at the
Department of Commerce.
In accordance with 19 CFR
351.213(b), this administrative review
covers only those producers or exporters
for which a review was specifically
requested. Accordingly, this
administrative review covers Nima and
its grower, Razi Domghan Agricultural
and Animal Husbandry Company (Razi)
and ten programs for the period of
review (POR) January 1, 2003, through
December 31, 2003.
Scope of the Order
For purposes of this order, the
product covered is in–shell pistachio
nuts from which the hulls have been
removed, leaving the inner hard shells
and edible meat, as currently
classifiable in the Harmonized Tariff
Schedules of the United States (HTSUS)
under item number 0802.50.20.00. The
HTSUS subheadings are provided for
convenience and customs purposes. The
written description of the scope is
dispositive.
Analysis of Comments Received
For a discussion of the programs and
the issue raised in the case and rebuttal
briefs by parties to this review, see the
Decision Memorandum, which is hereby
adopted by this notice. A listing of the
issue which parties raised and to which
we have responded, which is in the
Decision Memorandum, is attached to
this notice as Appendix I. Parties can
find a complete discussion of the issue
raised in this review and the
corresponding recommendation in this
public memorandum, which is on file in
the Central Records Unit (CRU), room
B–099 of the main Commerce building.
In addition, a complete version of the
Decision Memorandum can be accessed
directly on the World Wide Web at
https://ia.ita.doc.gov, under the heading
1 Petitioners include the California Pistachios
Commission (CPC) and its members and a domestic
interested party, Cal Pure Pistachios, Inc. (Cal Pure).
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
54027
‘‘Federal Register Notices.’’ The paper
copy and electronic version of the
Decision Memorandum are identical in
content.
Final Results of Review
In accordance with section 777A(e)(1)
of the Act and 19 CFR 351.221(b)(5), we
calculated an ad valorem subsidy rate
for Nima for calendar year 2003.
Producer/Exporter
Tehran Negah Nima
Trading Company,
Inc., trading as Nima
Trading Company
(Nima) and Razi
Domghan Agricultural
and Animal Husbandry Company
(Razi) .........................
Net Subsidy Rate
0.00 percent ad
valorem
As Nima is the exporter but not the
producer of subject merchandise, the
Department’s final results of review
apply to subject merchandise exported
by Nima and produced by Nima’s
supplier of pistachios, Razi. See 19 CFR
351.107(b) (providing that the
Department may establish a
combination rate for each combination
of exporter and its supplying producer).
Therefore, we will issue the following
cash deposit requirements, within 15
days of publication of the final results
of the instant review, for all shipments
of subject merchandise entered, or
withdrawn from warehouse, for
consumption on or after the date of
publication: (1) for merchandise
exported by Nima and produced by
Razi, the cash deposit rate will be 0.00
percent ad valorem, i.e., the rate
calculated in the final results of the
instant administrative review; (2) for
merchandise exported by Nima and
produced by Maghsoudi Farms, the cash
deposit rate will be 23.18 percent, the
rate calculated for Nima and Maghsoudi
Farms in the new shipper reviews (see
Certain In–Shell Pistachios (C–507–501)
and Certain Roasted In–Shell Pistachios
(C–507–601) from the Islamic Republic
of Iran: Final Results of New Shipper
Countervailing Duty Reviews, 68 FR
4997 (January 31, 2003) (New Shipper
Reviews); (3) for merchandise exported
by Nima but not produced by Razi or
Maghsoudi Farms, the cash deposit rate
will be the ‘‘all others’’ rate established
in the original CVD investigation (see 51
FR 8344 (March 11, 1986)); (4) if the
exporter is not a firm covered in this
review, a prior review, or the original
CVD investigation, but the producer is,
the cash deposit rate will be the rate
established for the most recent period
for the producer of the merchandise;
E:\FR\FM\13SEN1.SGM
13SEN1
54028
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 176 / Tuesday, September 13, 2005 / Notices
and (5) if neither the exporter nor
producer is a firm covered in this
review or the original investigation, the
cash deposit rate for all other producers
or exporters of the subject merchandise
will continue to be 99.52 percent ad
valorem. This rate is the ‘‘all others’’
rate from the final determination in the
original investigation.
This notice also serves as a reminder
to parties subject to administrative
protective order (APO) of their
responsibility concerning the
disposition of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely
written notification of return/
destruction of APO materials or
conversion to judicial protective order is
hereby requested. Failure to comply
with the regulations and the terms of an
APO is a sanctionable violation.
This administrative review and this
notice are issued and published in
accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and
777(i) of the Act.
Dated: September 6, 2005.
Joseph A. Spetrini,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration.
Appendix I - Issues and Decision
Memorandum
I. ANALYSIS OF PROGRAMS
A. Programs Determined to Be Not
Used
1. Provision of Fertilizer and
Machinery
2. Provision of Credit
3. Tax Exemptions
4. Provision of Water and Irrigation
Equipment
5. Technical Support
6. Duty Refunds on Imported Raw or
Intermediate Materials Used in the
Production of Export Goods
7. Program to Improve Quality of
Exports of Dried Fruit
8. Iranian Export Guarantee Fund
9. GOI Grants and Loans to Pistachio
Farmers
10.Crop Insurance for Pistachios
II. TOTAL AD VALOREM RATE
III. ANALYSIS OF COMMENTS
Comment 1: Use of Adverse Facts
Available
[FR Doc. E5–4994 Filed 9–12–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S
VerDate Aug<18>2005
16:06 Sep 12, 2005
Jkt 205001
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
The Manufacturing Council: Meeting of
the Manufacturing Council
International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce.
ACTION: Notice of public meeting.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The Manufacturing Council
will hold a full Council meeting to
discuss topics related to the state of
manufacturing. The Manufacturing
Council is a Secretarial Board at the
Department of Commerce, established to
ensure regular communication between
Government and the manufacturing
sector. This will be the fourth meeting
of The Manufacturing Council and will
include updates by the Council’s three
subcommittees. For information about
the Council, please visit the
Manufacturing Council Web site at:
https://www.manufacturing.gov/council.
DATES: September 27, 2005.
Time: 9:45 a.m.
ADDRESSES: Gateway Building, 200 NE.,
Water Street, Peoria, Illinois 61602. This
program is physically accessible to
people with disabilities. Requests for
sign language interpretation or other
auxiliary aids should be submitted no
later than September 19, 2005, to The
Manufacturing Council, Room 4043,
Washington, DC 20230.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The
Manufacturing Council Executive
Secretariat, Room 4043, Washington, DC
20230 (Phone: 202–482–1369).
Interested parties are encouraged to visit
The Manufacturing Council Web site
(https://www.manufacturing.gov/council)
for the most up-to-date information
about the meeting and the Council.
Dated: September 8, 2005.
Sam Giller,
Executive Secretary, The Manufacturing
Council.
[FR Doc. 05–18162 Filed 9–12–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DR–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
[Docket No. 050906238–5238–01; ID
090705E]
RIN 0648–ZB68
2006 Monkfish Research Set-aside
Program
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
AGENCY:
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Notice; solicitation of proposals
for research activities.
SUMMARY: NMFS announces that the
New England and Mid-Atlantic Fishery
Management Councils (Councils) have
set aside 500 monkfish days-at-sea
(DAS) to be used for research endeavors
under a research set-aside (RSA)
program. NMFS is soliciting proposals
to utilize the DAS for research activities
concerning the monkfish fishery for
fishing year 2006 (May 1, 2006–April
30, 2007). Through the allocation of
research DAS, the Monkfish RSA
Program provides a mechanism to
reduce the cost for vessel owners to
participate in cooperative monkfish
research. The intent of this RSA
program is for fishing vessels to utilize
these research DAS to conduct monkfish
related research, rather than their
allocated monkfish DAS, thereby
eliminating any cost to the vessel
associated with using a monkfish DAS.
DATES: Applications must be received
on or before 5 p.m. eastern standard
time on October 13, 2005. Delays may
be experienced when registering with
Grants.gov near the end of a solicitation
period. Therefore, NOAA strongly
recommends that applicants do not wait
until the deadline date to begin the
application process through https://
www.grants.gov.
ADDRESSES: Electronic application
submissions must be transmitted on-line
through https://www.grants.gov.
Applications submitted through https://
www.grants.gov will be accompanied by
a date and time receipt indication on
them. If an applicant does not have
Internet access, hard copy proposals
will be accepted, and date recorded
when they are received in the program
office. Paper applications must be sent
to NMFS, Northeast Regional Office,
One Blackburn Drive, Gloucester, MA
01930. Electronic or hard copies
received after the deadline will not be
considered, and hard copy applications
will be returned to the sender.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Information may be obtained from Paul
Howard, Executive Director, New
England Fishery Management Council
(NEFMC), by phone 978–465–0492, or
by fax 978–465–3116; Philip Haring,
Senior Fishery Analyst, NEFMC, by
phone 978–465–0492, or by email at
pharing@nefmc.org; or Allison Ferreira,
Fishery Policy Analyst, NMFS, by
phone 978–281–9103, by fax 978–281–
9135, or by e-mail at
allison.ferreira@noaa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
E:\FR\FM\13SEN1.SGM
13SEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 176 (Tuesday, September 13, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 54027-54028]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E5-4994]
[[Page 54027]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
(C-507-501)
Certain In-shell Pistachios from the Islamic Republic of Iran:
Final Results of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review
AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On April 7, 2005, the Department of Commerce (the Department)
published in the Federal Register its preliminary results in the
countervailing duty (CVD) administrative review of certain in-shell
pistachios from Iran. See Certain In-shell Pistachios from the Islamic
Republic of Iran: Preliminary Results of Countervailing Duty
Administrative Review, 70 FR 17653 (Preliminary Results). The
Department has now completed this administrative review in accordance
with section 751(a) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act).
Based on information received since the Preliminary Results and our
analysis of the comments received, the Department has not revised the
net subsidy rate for Tehran Negah Nima Trading Company, Inc., trading
as Nima Trading Company (Nima), the respondent company in this
proceeding. For further discussion of our positions, see the ``Issues
and Decision Memorandum'' from Barbara E. Tillman, Acting Deputy
Assistant Secretary for Import Administration, to Joseph A. Spetrini,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Import Administration, concerning the
``Final Results of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review: Certain
In-Shell Pistachios from the Islamic Republic of Iran'' (Decision
Memorandum) dated September 6, 2005. The final net subsidy rate for the
reviewed company is listed below in the section entitled ``Final
Results of Review.''
EFFECTIVE DATE: September 13, 2005.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Darla Brown, AD/CVD Operations, Office
3, Import Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, Room 4012, 14th
Street and Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone:
(202) 482-2786.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On April 7, 2005, the Department published in the Federal Register
its Preliminary Results. We invited interested parties to comment on
these results. Since the preliminary results, the following events have
occurred.
On May 9, 2005, petitioners\1\ submitted a request for a public
hearing. On June 24, 2005, we received case briefs from petitioners and
Nima. On July 1, 2005, we received rebuttal briefs from petitioners and
Nima. On July 25, 2005, Nima informed the Department that it would not
be participating in the hearing. On August 11, 2005, the Department
extended the time limit for the completion of its final results until
September 6, 2005. See Certain In-Shell Pistachios from the Islamic
Republic of Iran: Extension of Time Limit for Final Results of
Countervailing Duty Administrative Review, 70 FR 46814 (August 11,
2005). On August 15, 2005, a public hearing was held at the Department
of Commerce.
In accordance with 19 CFR 351.213(b), this administrative review
covers only those producers or exporters for which a review was
specifically requested. Accordingly, this administrative review covers
Nima and its grower, Razi Domghan Agricultural and Animal Husbandry
Company (Razi) and ten programs for the period of review (POR) January
1, 2003, through December 31, 2003.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Petitioners include the California Pistachios Commission
(CPC) and its members and a domestic interested party, Cal Pure
Pistachios, Inc. (Cal Pure).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Scope of the Order
For purposes of this order, the product covered is in-shell
pistachio nuts from which the hulls have been removed, leaving the
inner hard shells and edible meat, as currently classifiable in the
Harmonized Tariff Schedules of the United States (HTSUS) under item
number 0802.50.20.00. The HTSUS subheadings are provided for
convenience and customs purposes. The written description of the scope
is dispositive.
Analysis of Comments Received
For a discussion of the programs and the issue raised in the case
and rebuttal briefs by parties to this review, see the Decision
Memorandum, which is hereby adopted by this notice. A listing of the
issue which parties raised and to which we have responded, which is in
the Decision Memorandum, is attached to this notice as Appendix I.
Parties can find a complete discussion of the issue raised in this
review and the corresponding recommendation in this public memorandum,
which is on file in the Central Records Unit (CRU), room B-099 of the
main Commerce building. In addition, a complete version of the Decision
Memorandum can be accessed directly on the World Wide Web at https://
ia.ita.doc.gov, under the heading ``Federal Register Notices.'' The
paper copy and electronic version of the Decision Memorandum are
identical in content.
Final Results of Review
In accordance with section 777A(e)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR
351.221(b)(5), we calculated an ad valorem subsidy rate for Nima for
calendar year 2003.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Producer/Exporter Net Subsidy Rate
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tehran Negah Nima Trading Company, Inc., trading as 0.00 percent ad
Nima Trading Company (Nima) and Razi Domghan valorem
Agricultural and Animal Husbandry Company (Razi)...
------------------------------------------------------------------------
As Nima is the exporter but not the producer of subject
merchandise, the Department's final results of review apply to subject
merchandise exported by Nima and produced by Nima's supplier of
pistachios, Razi. See 19 CFR 351.107(b) (providing that the Department
may establish a combination rate for each combination of exporter and
its supplying producer).
Therefore, we will issue the following cash deposit requirements,
within 15 days of publication of the final results of the instant
review, for all shipments of subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn
from warehouse, for consumption on or after the date of publication:
(1) for merchandise exported by Nima and produced by Razi, the cash
deposit rate will be 0.00 percent ad valorem, i.e., the rate calculated
in the final results of the instant administrative review; (2) for
merchandise exported by Nima and produced by Maghsoudi Farms, the cash
deposit rate will be 23.18 percent, the rate calculated for Nima and
Maghsoudi Farms in the new shipper reviews (see Certain In-Shell
Pistachios (C-507-501) and Certain Roasted In-Shell Pistachios (C-507-
601) from the Islamic Republic of Iran: Final Results of New Shipper
Countervailing Duty Reviews, 68 FR 4997 (January 31, 2003) (New Shipper
Reviews); (3) for merchandise exported by Nima but not produced by Razi
or Maghsoudi Farms, the cash deposit rate will be the ``all others''
rate established in the original CVD investigation (see 51 FR 8344
(March 11, 1986)); (4) if the exporter is not a firm covered in this
review, a prior review, or the original CVD investigation, but the
producer is, the cash deposit rate will be the rate established for the
most recent period for the producer of the merchandise;
[[Page 54028]]
and (5) if neither the exporter nor producer is a firm covered in this
review or the original investigation, the cash deposit rate for all
other producers or exporters of the subject merchandise will continue
to be 99.52 percent ad valorem. This rate is the ``all others'' rate
from the final determination in the original investigation.
This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to
administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility
concerning the disposition of proprietary information disclosed under
APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely written
notification of return/destruction of APO materials or conversion to
judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to comply with
the regulations and the terms of an APO is a sanctionable violation.
This administrative review and this notice are issued and published
in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i) of the Act.
Dated: September 6, 2005.
Joseph A. Spetrini,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Import Administration.
Appendix I - Issues and Decision Memorandum
I. ANALYSIS OF PROGRAMS
A. Programs Determined to Be Not Used
1. Provision of Fertilizer and Machinery
2. Provision of Credit
3. Tax Exemptions
4. Provision of Water and Irrigation Equipment
5. Technical Support
6. Duty Refunds on Imported Raw or Intermediate Materials Used in
the Production of Export Goods
7. Program to Improve Quality of Exports of Dried Fruit
8. Iranian Export Guarantee Fund
9. GOI Grants and Loans to Pistachio Farmers
10.Crop Insurance for Pistachios
II. TOTAL AD VALOREM RATE
III. ANALYSIS OF COMMENTS
Comment 1: Use of Adverse Facts Available
[FR Doc. E5-4994 Filed 9-12-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-S