Lear Automotive Manufacturing, LLC, Monroe, MI; Dismissal of Application for Reconsideration, 53388 [E5-4881]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
53388
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 173 / Thursday, September 8, 2005 / Notices
APPENDIX—Continued
[Petitions instituted between 08/15/2005 and 08/19/2005]
Subject firm
(petitioners)
Location
OWT Industries, Inc. (Comp) .................................................
Preco, Inc. (Wkrs) ..................................................................
Pleasant Hill Veneer Corp (Wkrs) ..........................................
Brockway Pressed Metals, Inc. (USWA) ...............................
Gemtron Corporation (Wkrs) ..................................................
Kemtah Group, Inc (State) .....................................................
Sonoco, Inc. (Comp) ..............................................................
Cintas Rockcastle Mt. Mfg. (Comp) .......................................
Nu-Gro Technologies, Inc. NY (NPC) ....................................
McLaughlin Co. (State) ..........................................................
Brick Lens Restaurant (State) ................................................
Greenfield Inn (NPS) ..............................................................
Greenfield Montague Transit Area (NPS) ..............................
Laufen Interntional, Inc. (Comp) ............................................
Cross Stone Product, LLC (Comp) ........................................
AmbiTech, Inc. (Comp) ..........................................................
Amveco Magnetics, Inc. (Comp) ............................................
Sail (Wkrs) ..............................................................................
Accellent (Comp) ....................................................................
Kwan Sewing (Comp) ............................................................
GE Consumer Finance (Wkrs) ...............................................
Cognis Corporation (USWA) ..................................................
3 M (State) .............................................................................
TCS Manufacturing, Inc. (Comp) ...........................................
Southwire (State) ....................................................................
Power-One (Wkrs) ..................................................................
Demag Cranes and Components (IBT) .................................
Nuvo Network Management Corp. (Comp) ...........................
Johnson Controls, Inc. (Comp) ..............................................
Sara Lee Corporation (Wkrs) .................................................
Viasystems Consumer Group (Comp) ...................................
Kellwood Company (Comp) ...................................................
Edward Fields, Inc. (Wkrs) .....................................................
Harper Pet Products, Inc. (Comp) .........................................
Pinkins, SC ..............................
Boise, ID ..................................
Pleasant Hill, MO .....................
Brockway, PA ..........................
Sweetwater, TN .......................
Corvllis, OR ..............................
Canandaigua, NY ....................
Vernon, KY ..............................
Gloversville, .............................
Petoskey, MI ............................
Greenfield, MA .........................
Greenfield, MA .........................
Greenfield, MA .........................
Tulsa, OK .................................
Bristol, VA ................................
Chatsworth, CA ........................
Houston, TX .............................
Piscataway, NJ ........................
Corry, PA .................................
San Francisco, CA ...................
Schaumburg, IL .......................
Cincinnati, OH ..........................
Fairmont, MN ...........................
Jamestown, NY ........................
Long Beach, CA ......................
Carlsbad, CA ...........................
Cleveland, OH .........................
Pennsauken, NJ ......................
Holland, MI ...............................
Winston Salem, NC .................
Mishawaka, IN .........................
Summit, MS .............................
College Point, NY ....................
Bedford Park, IL .......................
TA–W
57,773
57,774
57,775
57,776
57,777
57,778
57,779
57,780
57,781
57,782
57,783
57,784
57,785
57,786
57,787
57,788
57,789
57,790
57,791
57,792
57,793
57,794
57,795
57,796
57,797
57,798
57,799
57,800
57,801
57,802
57,803
57,804
57,805
57,806
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
Signed at Washington, DC, this 31st day of
August, 2005.
Terrance Clark,
Acting Director, Division of Trade Adjustment
Assistance.
[FR Doc. E5–4881 Filed 9–7–05; 8:45 am]
[FR Doc. E5–4884 Filed 9–7–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–30–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
BILLING CODE 4510–30–P
[TA–W–57,230]
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Lear Automotive Manufacturing, LLC,
Monroe, MI; Dismissal of Application
for Reconsideration
Employment and Training
Administration
Pursuant to 29 CFR 90.18(C) an
application for administrative
reconsideration was filed with the
Director of the Division of Trade
Adjustment Assistance for workers at
Lear Automotive Manufacturing, LLC,
Monroe, Michigan. The application
contained no new substantial
information which would bear
importantly on the Department’s
determination. Therefore, dismissal of
the application was issued.
TA–W–57,230; Lear Automotive
Manufacturing, LLC Monroe, Michigan
(August 31, 2005)
VerDate Aug<18>2005
15:25 Sep 07, 2005
Jkt 205001
Notice of Determinations Regarding
Eligibility To Apply for Worker
Adjustment Assistance
In accordance with Section 223 of the
Trade Act of 1974, as amended, (19
U.S.C. 2273), the Department of Labor
herein presents summaries of
determinations regarding eligibility to
apply for trade adjustment assistance for
workers (TA–W) number and alternative
trade adjustment assistance (ATAA) by
(TA–W) number issued during the
periods of August 2005.
In order for an affirmative
determination to be made and a
PO 00000
Frm 00058
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Date of
institution
08/18/2005
08/18/2005
08/18/2005
08/18/2005
08/18/2005
08/18/2005
08/18/2005
08/18/2005
08/18/2005
08/18/2005
08/18/2005
08/18/2005
08/18/2005
08/18/2005
08/18/2005
08/18/2005
08/18/2005
08/18/2005
08/18/2005
08/19/2005
08/19/2005
08/19/2005
08/19/2005
08/19/2005
08/19/2005
08/19/2005
08/19/2005
08/19/2005
08/19/2005
08/19/2005
08/19/2005
08/19/2005
08/19/2005
08/19/2005
Date of
petition
08/17/2005
08/08/2005
07/27/2005
08/17/2005
08/16/2005
08/17/2005
08/17/2005
08/05/2005
08/15/2005
08/08/2005
08/05/2005
08/05/2005
08/05/2005
07/29/2005
07/25/2005
08/03/2005
08/10/2005
08/09/2005
08/05/2005
07/25/2005
08/02/2005
08/18/2005
08/18/2005
08/12/2005
08/11/2005
08/10/2005
08/08/2005
08/09/2005
08/11/2005
07/29/2005
09/18/2005
08/17/2005
07/28/2005
08/17/2005
certification of eligibility to apply for
directly-impacted (primary) worker
adjustment assistance to be issued, each
of the group eligibility requirements of
Section 222(a) of the Act must be met.
I. Section (a)(2)(A) all of the following
must be satisfied:
A. A significant number or proportion
of the workers in such workers’ firm, or
an appropriate subdivision of the firm,
have become totally or partially
separated, or are threatened to become
totally or partially separated;
B. The sales or production, or both, of
such firm or subdivision have decreased
absolutely; and
C. increased imports of articles like or
directly competitive with articles
produced by such firm or subdivision
have contributed importantly to such
workers’ separation or threat of
separation and to the decline in sales or
production of such firm or subdivision;
or
II. Section (a)(2)(B) both of the
following must be satisfied:
A. A significant number or proportion
of the workers in such workers’ firm, or
an appropriate subdivision of the firm,
have become totally or partially
E:\FR\FM\08SEN1.SGM
08SEN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 173 (Thursday, September 8, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 53388]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E5-4881]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training Administration
[TA-W-57,230]
Lear Automotive Manufacturing, LLC, Monroe, MI; Dismissal of
Application for Reconsideration
Pursuant to 29 CFR 90.18(C) an application for administrative
reconsideration was filed with the Director of the Division of Trade
Adjustment Assistance for workers at Lear Automotive Manufacturing,
LLC, Monroe, Michigan. The application contained no new substantial
information which would bear importantly on the Department's
determination. Therefore, dismissal of the application was issued.
TA-W-57,230; Lear Automotive Manufacturing, LLC Monroe, Michigan
(August 31, 2005)
Signed at Washington, DC, this 31st day of August, 2005.
Terrance Clark,
Acting Director, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E5-4881 Filed 9-7-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-P
