Lear Automotive Manufacturing, LLC, Monroe, MI; Dismissal of Application for Reconsideration, 53388 [E5-4881]

Download as PDF 53388 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 173 / Thursday, September 8, 2005 / Notices APPENDIX—Continued [Petitions instituted between 08/15/2005 and 08/19/2005] Subject firm (petitioners) Location OWT Industries, Inc. (Comp) ................................................. Preco, Inc. (Wkrs) .................................................................. Pleasant Hill Veneer Corp (Wkrs) .......................................... Brockway Pressed Metals, Inc. (USWA) ............................... Gemtron Corporation (Wkrs) .................................................. Kemtah Group, Inc (State) ..................................................... Sonoco, Inc. (Comp) .............................................................. Cintas Rockcastle Mt. Mfg. (Comp) ....................................... Nu-Gro Technologies, Inc. NY (NPC) .................................... McLaughlin Co. (State) .......................................................... Brick Lens Restaurant (State) ................................................ Greenfield Inn (NPS) .............................................................. Greenfield Montague Transit Area (NPS) .............................. Laufen Interntional, Inc. (Comp) ............................................ Cross Stone Product, LLC (Comp) ........................................ AmbiTech, Inc. (Comp) .......................................................... Amveco Magnetics, Inc. (Comp) ............................................ Sail (Wkrs) .............................................................................. Accellent (Comp) .................................................................... Kwan Sewing (Comp) ............................................................ GE Consumer Finance (Wkrs) ............................................... Cognis Corporation (USWA) .................................................. 3 M (State) ............................................................................. TCS Manufacturing, Inc. (Comp) ........................................... Southwire (State) .................................................................... Power-One (Wkrs) .................................................................. Demag Cranes and Components (IBT) ................................. Nuvo Network Management Corp. (Comp) ........................... Johnson Controls, Inc. (Comp) .............................................. Sara Lee Corporation (Wkrs) ................................................. Viasystems Consumer Group (Comp) ................................... Kellwood Company (Comp) ................................................... Edward Fields, Inc. (Wkrs) ..................................................... Harper Pet Products, Inc. (Comp) ......................................... Pinkins, SC .............................. Boise, ID .................................. Pleasant Hill, MO ..................... Brockway, PA .......................... Sweetwater, TN ....................... Corvllis, OR .............................. Canandaigua, NY .................... Vernon, KY .............................. Gloversville, ............................. Petoskey, MI ............................ Greenfield, MA ......................... Greenfield, MA ......................... Greenfield, MA ......................... Tulsa, OK ................................. Bristol, VA ................................ Chatsworth, CA ........................ Houston, TX ............................. Piscataway, NJ ........................ Corry, PA ................................. San Francisco, CA ................... Schaumburg, IL ....................... Cincinnati, OH .......................... Fairmont, MN ........................... Jamestown, NY ........................ Long Beach, CA ...................... Carlsbad, CA ........................... Cleveland, OH ......................... Pennsauken, NJ ...................... Holland, MI ............................... Winston Salem, NC ................. Mishawaka, IN ......................... Summit, MS ............................. College Point, NY .................... Bedford Park, IL ....................... TA–W 57,773 57,774 57,775 57,776 57,777 57,778 57,779 57,780 57,781 57,782 57,783 57,784 57,785 57,786 57,787 57,788 57,789 57,790 57,791 57,792 57,793 57,794 57,795 57,796 57,797 57,798 57,799 57,800 57,801 57,802 57,803 57,804 57,805 57,806 .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... Signed at Washington, DC, this 31st day of August, 2005. Terrance Clark, Acting Director, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance. [FR Doc. E5–4881 Filed 9–7–05; 8:45 am] [FR Doc. E5–4884 Filed 9–7–05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4510–30–P DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Employment and Training Administration BILLING CODE 4510–30–P [TA–W–57,230] DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Lear Automotive Manufacturing, LLC, Monroe, MI; Dismissal of Application for Reconsideration Employment and Training Administration Pursuant to 29 CFR 90.18(C) an application for administrative reconsideration was filed with the Director of the Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance for workers at Lear Automotive Manufacturing, LLC, Monroe, Michigan. The application contained no new substantial information which would bear importantly on the Department’s determination. Therefore, dismissal of the application was issued. TA–W–57,230; Lear Automotive Manufacturing, LLC Monroe, Michigan (August 31, 2005) VerDate Aug<18>2005 15:25 Sep 07, 2005 Jkt 205001 Notice of Determinations Regarding Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, (19 U.S.C. 2273), the Department of Labor herein presents summaries of determinations regarding eligibility to apply for trade adjustment assistance for workers (TA–W) number and alternative trade adjustment assistance (ATAA) by (TA–W) number issued during the periods of August 2005. In order for an affirmative determination to be made and a PO 00000 Frm 00058 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 Date of institution 08/18/2005 08/18/2005 08/18/2005 08/18/2005 08/18/2005 08/18/2005 08/18/2005 08/18/2005 08/18/2005 08/18/2005 08/18/2005 08/18/2005 08/18/2005 08/18/2005 08/18/2005 08/18/2005 08/18/2005 08/18/2005 08/18/2005 08/19/2005 08/19/2005 08/19/2005 08/19/2005 08/19/2005 08/19/2005 08/19/2005 08/19/2005 08/19/2005 08/19/2005 08/19/2005 08/19/2005 08/19/2005 08/19/2005 08/19/2005 Date of petition 08/17/2005 08/08/2005 07/27/2005 08/17/2005 08/16/2005 08/17/2005 08/17/2005 08/05/2005 08/15/2005 08/08/2005 08/05/2005 08/05/2005 08/05/2005 07/29/2005 07/25/2005 08/03/2005 08/10/2005 08/09/2005 08/05/2005 07/25/2005 08/02/2005 08/18/2005 08/18/2005 08/12/2005 08/11/2005 08/10/2005 08/08/2005 08/09/2005 08/11/2005 07/29/2005 09/18/2005 08/17/2005 07/28/2005 08/17/2005 certification of eligibility to apply for directly-impacted (primary) worker adjustment assistance to be issued, each of the group eligibility requirements of Section 222(a) of the Act must be met. I. Section (a)(2)(A) all of the following must be satisfied: A. A significant number or proportion of the workers in such workers’ firm, or an appropriate subdivision of the firm, have become totally or partially separated, or are threatened to become totally or partially separated; B. The sales or production, or both, of such firm or subdivision have decreased absolutely; and C. increased imports of articles like or directly competitive with articles produced by such firm or subdivision have contributed importantly to such workers’ separation or threat of separation and to the decline in sales or production of such firm or subdivision; or II. Section (a)(2)(B) both of the following must be satisfied: A. A significant number or proportion of the workers in such workers’ firm, or an appropriate subdivision of the firm, have become totally or partially E:\FR\FM\08SEN1.SGM 08SEN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 173 (Thursday, September 8, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 53388]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E5-4881]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-57,230]


Lear Automotive Manufacturing, LLC, Monroe, MI; Dismissal of 
Application for Reconsideration

    Pursuant to 29 CFR 90.18(C) an application for administrative 
reconsideration was filed with the Director of the Division of Trade 
Adjustment Assistance for workers at Lear Automotive Manufacturing, 
LLC, Monroe, Michigan. The application contained no new substantial 
information which would bear importantly on the Department's 
determination. Therefore, dismissal of the application was issued.

TA-W-57,230; Lear Automotive Manufacturing, LLC Monroe, Michigan 
(August 31, 2005)

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 31st day of August, 2005.
Terrance Clark,
Acting Director, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E5-4881 Filed 9-7-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-P