Sugar From the European Union; Sugar from Belgium, France, and Germany, 52446-52447 [05-17489]

Download as PDF 52446 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 170 / Friday, September 2, 2005 / Notices DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR National Park Service Plan of Operations, Categorical Exclusion, Big Thicket National Preserve, TX National Park Service, Department of the Interior ACTION: Notice of Availability of a Plan of Operations and Categorical Exclusion for a 30-day public review at Big Thicket National Preserve. AGENCY: SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given in accordance with Section 9.52(b) of Title 36 of the Code of Federal Regulations, part 9, subpart B, that the National Park Service (NPS) has received from Krescent Energy Company, LLC, a Plan of Operations to conduct the Tyler 3–D ‘‘Cable-Only’’ Seismic Survey of the Upper Neches River Corridor Unit of Big Thicket National Preserve, within Tyler and Jasper Counties, Texas. The NPS has prepared a Categorical Exclusion on this proposal. DATES: The above documents are available for public review and comment through October 3, 2005. ADDRESSES: The Plan of Operations and Categorical Exclusion are available for public review and comment in the Office of the Superintendent, Art Hutchinson, Big Thicket National Preserve, 3785 Milam Street, Beaumont, Texas 77701. Copies of the Plan of Operations are available, for a duplication fee; and copies of the Categorical Exclusion are available upon request, and at no cost, from the Superintendent, Art Hutchinson, Big Thicket National Preserve, 3785 Milam Street, Beaumont, Texas 77701. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Haigler ‘‘Dusty’’ Pate, Oil and Gas Program Manager, Big Thicket National Preserve, 3785 Milam Street, Beaumont, Texas 77701, Telephone: 409 951–6822, e-mail at Haigler_Pate@nps.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: If you wish to submit comments on these documents within the 30 days; mail them to the street address provided above, hand-deliver them to the park at the street address provided above, or electronically file them to the e-mail address provided above. Our practice is to make comments, including names and home addresses of respondents, available for public review during regular business hours. Individual respondents may request that we withhold their home address from the record, which we will honor to the extent allowable by law. There also may be circumstances in which we would withhold from the record a respondent’s VerDate Aug<18>2005 18:00 Sep 01, 2005 Jkt 205001 identity, as allowable by law. If you wish us to withhold your name and/or address, you must state this prominently at the beginning of your comment. We will make all submissions from organizations or businesses, and from individuals identifying themselves as representatives or officials of organizations or businesses, available for public inspection in their entirety. Dated: August 16, 2005. Michael George, Acting Superintendent, Big Thicket National Preserve, National Park Service. [FR Doc. 05–17485 Filed 9–1–05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4312–CB–P DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR National Park Service Plan of Operations, Categorical Exclusion, Big Thicket National Preserve, TX National Park Service, Department of the Interior. ACTION: Notice of Availability of a Plan of Operations and Categorical Exclusion for a 30-day public review at Big Thicket National Preserve. AGENCY: SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given in accordance with § 9.52(b) of Title 36 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Part 9, Subpart B, that the National Park Service (NPS) has received from Century Exploration Houston, Inc., a Plan of Operations to conduct the JASPO 3–D ‘‘Cable-Only’’ Seismic Survey of the Lower Neches River Corridor Unit of Big Thicket National Preserve, within Hardin, Jasper, and Orange Counties, Texas. The NPS has prepared a Categorical Exclusion on this proposal. DATES: The above documents are available for public review and comment through October 3, 2005. ADDRESSES: The Plan of Operations and Categorical Exclusion are available for public review and comment in the Office of the Superintendent, Art Hutchinson, Big Thicket National Preserve, 3785 Milam Street, Beaumont, Texas 77701. Copies of the Plan of Operations are available, for a duplication fee; and copies of the Categorical Exclusion are available upon request, and at no cost, from the Superintendent, Art Hutchinson, Big Thicket National Preserve, 3785 Milam Street, Beaumont, Texas 77701. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Haigler ‘‘Dusty’’ Pate, Oil and Gas Program Manager, Big Thicket National Preserve, 3785 Milam Street, Beaumont, PO 00000 Frm 00086 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 Texas 77701, Telephone: 409 951–6822, e-mail at Haigler_Pate@nps.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: If you wish to submit comments on these documents within the 30 days; mail them to the street address provided above, hand-deliver them to the park at the street address provided above, or electronically file them to the e-mail address provided above. Our practice is to make comments, including names and home addresses of respondents, available for public review during regular business hours. Individual respondents may request that we withhold their home address from the record, which we will honor to the extent allowable by law. There also may be circumstances in which we would withhold from the record a respondent’s identity, as allowable by law. If you wish us to withhold your name and/or address, you must state this prominently at the beginning of your comment. We will make all submissions from organizations or businesses, and from individuals identifying themselves as representatives or officials of organizations or businesses, available for public inspection in their entirety. Dated: August 16, 2005. Michael George, Acting Superintendent, Big Thicket National Preserve, National Park Service. [FR Doc. 05–17486 Filed 9–1–05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4312–CB–P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation No. 104–TAA–7 (Second Review); Investigation Nos. AA1921–198– 200 (Second Review)] Sugar From the European Union; Sugar from Belgium, France, and Germany Determinations On the basis of the record 1 developed in the subject five-year reviews, the United States International Trade Commission (Commission) determines, pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)) (the Act), that revocation of the countervailing duty order on sugar from the European Union would not be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury to an industry in the United States within a reasonably foreseeable time.2 The Commission also determines that revocation of the 1 The record is defined in sec. 207.2(f) of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 207.2(f)). 2 Commissioner Marcia E. Miller dissenting. E:\FR\FM\02SEN1.SGM 02SEN1 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 170 / Friday, September 2, 2005 / Notices antidumping findings on sugar from Belgium, France, and Germany would not be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury to an industry in the United States within a reasonably foreseeable time.3 Background The Commission instituted these reviews on September 1, 2004 (69 FR 53466) and determined on December 6, 2004 that it would conduct full reviews (69 FR 75568, December 17, 2004). Notice of the scheduling of the Commission’s reviews and of a public hearing to be held in connection therewith was given by posting copies of the notice in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, Washington, DC, and by publishing the notice in the Federal Register on February 2, 2005 (70 FR 5480). The hearing was held in Washington, DC, on June 28, 2005, and all persons who requested the opportunity were permitted to appear in person or by counsel. The Commission transmitted its determinations in these reviews to the Secretary of Commerce on August 29, 2005. The views of the Commission are contained in USITC Publication 3793 (August 2005), entitled Sugar from the European Union, and Sugar from Belgium, France, and Germany: Investigation Nos. 104-TAA–7 (Second Review) and AA1921–198–200 (Second Review). Issued: August 29, 2005. By order of the Commission. Marilyn R. Abbott, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. 05–17489 Filed 9–1–05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Executive Office for Immigration Review Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection; Comments Requested 30-Day Notice of Information Collection Under Review: Application for Cancellation of Removal (42a) for Certain Permanent Residents; (42b) and Adjustment of Status for Certain Nonpermanent Residents. ACTION: The Department of Justice (DOJ), Executive Office for Immigration Review (EOIR) has submitted the following information collection request to the Office of Management and Budget 3 Commissioner VerDate Aug<18>2005 Marcia E. Miller dissenting. 18:00 Sep 01, 2005 Jkt 205001 (OMB) for review and approval in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. The proposed information collection is published to obtain comments from the public and affected agencies. This proposed information collection was previously published in the Federal Register Volume 70, Number 110, page 33762 on June 9, 2005, allowing for a 60-day comment period. The purpose of this notice is to allow for an additional 30 days for public comment until October 3, 2005. This process is conducted in accordance with 5 CFR 1320.10. Written comments and/or suggestions regarding the items contained in this notice, especially the estimated public burden and associated response time, should be directed to the Office of Management and Budget, Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Attention Department of Justice Desk Officer, Washington, DC 20503. Additionally, comments may be submitted to OMB via facsimile to (202) 395–5806. Written comments and suggestions from the public and affected agencies concerning the proposed collection of information are encouraged. Your comments should address one or more of the following four points: —Evaluate whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including whether the information will have practical utility; —Evaluate the accuracy of the agencies estimate of the burden of the proposed collection of information, including the validity of the methodology and assumptions used; —Enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and —Minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who are to respond, including through the use of appropriate automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or other forms of information technology, e.g., permitting electronic submission of responses. Overview of This Information Collection (1) Type of Information Collection: Revision of a currently approved collection. (2) Title of the Form/Collection: Application for Cancellation of Removal (42a) for Certain Permanent Residents; (42b) and Adjustment of Status for Certain Nonpermanent Residents. PO 00000 Frm 00087 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 52447 (3) Agency form number, if any, and the applicable component of the Department sponsoring the collection: Form Number: EOIR–42A, EOIR–42B. Executive Office for Immigration Review, United States Department of Justice. (4) Affected public who will be asked or required to respond, as well as a brief abstract: Primary: Individual aliens determined to be removable from the United States. Other: None. Abstract: This information collection is necessary to determine the statutory eligibility of individual aliens who have been determined to be removable from the United States for cancellation of their removal, as well as to provide information relevant to a favorable exercise of discretion. (5) An estimate of the total number of respondents and the amount of time estimated for an average respondent to respond/reply: It is estimated that 11,000 respondents will complete the form annually with an average of 5 hours, 45 minutes per response. (6) An estimate of the total public burden (in hours) associated with the collection: There are an estimated 64,130 total annual burden hours associated with this collection. If additional information is required contact: Brenda E. Dyer, Department Clearance Officer, United States Department of Justice, Justice Management Division, Policy and Planning Staff, Patrick Henry Building, Suite 1600, 601 D Street NW., Washington, DC 20530. Dated: August 29, 2005. Brenda E. Dyer, Department Clearance Officer, Department of Justice. [FR Doc. 05–17462 Filed 9–1–05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4410–30–P DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Employment Standards Administration Wage and Hour Division Minimum Wages for Federal and Federally Assisted Construction; General Wage Determination Decisions General wage determination decisions of the Secretary of Labor are issued in accordance with applicable law and are based on the information obtained by the Department of Labor from its study of local wage conditions and data made available from other sources. They specify the basic hourly wage rates and fringe benefits which are determined to be prevailing for the described classes of laborers and mechanics employed on construction projects of a similar E:\FR\FM\02SEN1.SGM 02SEN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 170 (Friday, September 2, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 52446-52447]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-17489]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Investigation No. 104-TAA-7 (Second Review); Investigation Nos. 
AA1921-198-200 (Second Review)]


Sugar From the European Union; Sugar from Belgium, France, and 
Germany

Determinations

    On the basis of the record \1\ developed in the subject five-year 
reviews, the United States International Trade Commission (Commission) 
determines, pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 
U.S.C. 1675(c)) (the Act), that revocation of the countervailing duty 
order on sugar from the European Union would not be likely to lead to 
continuation or recurrence of material injury to an industry in the 
United States within a reasonably foreseeable time.\2\ The Commission 
also determines that revocation of the

[[Page 52447]]

antidumping findings on sugar from Belgium, France, and Germany would 
not be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury 
to an industry in the United States within a reasonably foreseeable 
time.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ The record is defined in sec. 207.2(f) of the Commission's 
Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 207.2(f)).
    \2\ Commissioner Marcia E. Miller dissenting.
    \3\ Commissioner Marcia E. Miller dissenting.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Background

    The Commission instituted these reviews on September 1, 2004 (69 FR 
53466) and determined on December 6, 2004 that it would conduct full 
reviews (69 FR 75568, December 17, 2004). Notice of the scheduling of 
the Commission's reviews and of a public hearing to be held in 
connection therewith was given by posting copies of the notice in the 
Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, 
Washington, DC, and by publishing the notice in the Federal Register on 
February 2, 2005 (70 FR 5480). The hearing was held in Washington, DC, 
on June 28, 2005, and all persons who requested the opportunity were 
permitted to appear in person or by counsel.
    The Commission transmitted its determinations in these reviews to 
the Secretary of Commerce on August 29, 2005. The views of the 
Commission are contained in USITC Publication 3793 (August 2005), 
entitled Sugar from the European Union, and Sugar from Belgium, France, 
and Germany: Investigation Nos. 104-TAA-7 (Second Review) and AA1921-
198-200 (Second Review).

    Issued: August 29, 2005.

    By order of the Commission.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 05-17489 Filed 9-1-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P