1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane (DBCP) Standard; Extension of the Office of Management and Budget's (OMB) Approval of Information Collection (Paperwork) Requirements, 52132-52134 [05-17438]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
52132
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 169 / Thursday, September 1, 2005 / Notices
Signed at Washington, DC, this 18th day of
August, 2005.
Linda G. Poole,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade
Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E5–4783 Filed 8–31–05; 8:45 am]
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
[TA–W–57,590]
BILLING CODE 4510–30–P
Union Stamping & Assembly, Inc., d/b/
a/ Mayflower Vehicle Systems, South
Charleston, WV; Notice of Termination
of Investigation
Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade
Act of 1974, as amended, an
investigation was initiated on July 20,
2005 in response to a petition filed on
behalf of workers at Union Stamping &
Assembly, d/b/a Mayflower Vehicle
Systems, South Charleston, West
Virginia.
The petitioners have requested that
the petition be withdrawn.
Consequently, further investigation
would serve no purpose, and the
investigation has been terminated.
Signed at Washington, DC, this 15th day of
August, 2005.
Linda G. Poole,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade
Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E5–4781 Filed 8–31–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–30–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
[TA–W–57,683]
National Spinning Co., LLC, Alamance
Dye Plant, Burlington, NC; Notice of
Termination of Investigation
Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade
Act of 1974, as amended, an
investigation was initiated on August 5,
2005 in response to a petition filed by
a company official on behalf of workers
at National Spinning Co., LLC,
Alamance Dye Plant, Burlington, North
Carolina.
The petitioning group of workers is
covered by an earlier petition (TA–W–
57,619) instituted on July 26, 2005, and
filed on behalf of workers of the firm in
Whiteville, North Carolina and other
locations, including the Alamance Dye
Plant in Burlington. That petition is
subject of an ongoing investigation for
which a determination has not yet been
issued.
Further investigation in this case
would serve no purpose. Consequently,
the investigation under this petition has
been terminated.
VerDate Aug<18>2005
16:30 Aug 31, 2005
Jkt 205001
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
[TA–W–57,214]
Omnova Solutions, Inc., Decorative
Products Division, Jeannette, PA;
Notice of Revised Determination on
Reconsideration
By letter of July 18, 2005 United Steel
Workers of America, Local 22 requested
administrative reconsideration of the
Department’s negative determination
regarding eligibility for workers and
former workers of the subject firm to
apply for Trade Adjustment Assistance
(TAA) and Alternative Trade
Adjustment Assistance (ATAA).
The initial investigation resulted in a
negative determination signed on June
28, 2005 was based on the finding that
there were no company imports of
industrial films and laminates and no
shift of production to a foreign source
during the relevant period. The denial
notice was published in the Federal
Register on July 20, 2005 (70 FR 41792).
To support the request for
reconsideration, the petitioner supplied
additional information regarding the
subject firm’s joint venture with a
foreign company and requested that the
Department of Labor perform additional
analysis of the data received upon the
initial investigation.
Upon the revision of the data
collected during the investigation and
further contact with the subject firm’s
company official and subject firm’s
customer, it was revealed that the
subject firm and a major declining
customer increased its import purchases
of industrial films and laminates during
the relevant time period.
In accordance with Section 246 the
Trade Act of 1974 (26 U.S.C. 2813), as
amended, the Department of Labor
herein presents the results of its
investigation regarding certification of
eligibility to apply for Alternative Trade
Adjustment Assistance (ATAA) for
older workers.
In order for the Department to issue
a certification of eligibility to apply for
ATAA, the group eligibility
requirements of Section 246 of the
Trade Act must be met. The Department
has determined in this case that the
PO 00000
Frm 00067
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
requirements of Section 246 have been
met.
A significant number of workers at the
firm are age 50 or over and possess
skills that are not easily transferable.
Competitive conditions within the
industry are adverse.
Conclusion
After careful review of the additional
facts obtained on reconsideration, I
conclude that increased imports of
articles like or directly competitive with
those produced at Omnova Solutions,
Inc., Decorative Products Division,
Jeannette, Pennsylvania, contributed
importantly to the declines in sales or
production and to the total or partial
separation of workers at the subject
firm. In accordance with the provisions
of the Act, I make the following
certification:
All workers of Omnova Solutions, Inc.,
Decorative Products Division, Jeannette,
Pennsylvania who became totally or partially
separated from employment on or after May
6, 2004 through two years from the date of
this certification, are eligible to apply for
adjustment assistance under Section 223 of
the Trade Act of 1974, and are eligible to
apply for alternative trade adjustment
assistance under Section 246 of the Trade Act
of 1974.
Signed in Washington, DC, this 19th day of
August, 2005.
Elliott S. Kushner,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade
Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E5–4776 Filed 8–31–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–30–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Occupational Safety and Health
Administration
[Docket No. ICR–1218–0101(2005)]
1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane (DBCP)
Standard; Extension of the Office of
Management and Budget’s (OMB)
Approval of Information Collection
(Paperwork) Requirements
Occupational Safety and Health
Administration (OSHA), Labor.
ACTION: Request for public comment.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: OSHA solicits public
comment concerning its request for an
extension of the information collection
requirements contained in the 1,2Dibromo-3-Chloropropane Standard (the
‘‘DBCP’’ Standard) (29 CFR 1910.1044).
DATES: Comment must be submitted by
the following dates:
Hard copy: Your comments must be
submitted (postmarked or received) by
October 31, 2005.
E:\FR\FM\01SEN1.SGM
01SEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 169 / Thursday, September 1, 2005 / Notices
Facsimile and electronic
transmission: Your comments must be
received by October 31, 2005.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by OSHA Docket No. ICR–
1218–0101(2005), by any of the
following methods:
Regular mail, express delivery, hand
delivery, and messenger service: Submit
your comments and attachments to the
OSHA Docket Office, Room N–2625,
U.S. Department of Labor, 200
Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington,
DC 20210; telephone (202) 693–2350
(OSHA’s TTY number is (877) 889–
5627). OSHA Docket Office and
Department of Labor hours are 8:15 a.m.
to 4:45 p.m., e.t.
Facsimile: If your comments are 10
pages or fewer in length, including
attachments, you may fax them to the
OSHA Docket Office at (202) 693–1648.
Electronic: You may submit
comments through the Internet at
https://ecomments.osha.gov. Follow
instructions on the OSHA Webpage for
submitting comments.
Docket: For access to the docket to
read or download comments or
background materials, such as the
complete Information Collection
Request (ICR) (Containing the
Supporting Statement, OMB–83–I Form,
and attachments), go to OSHA’s Web
page at https://www.OSHA.gov. In
addition, the ICR, comments and
submissions are available for inspection
and copying at the OSHA Docket Office
at the address above. You may also
contact Todd Owen at the address
below to obtain a copy of the ICR. For
additional information on submitting
comments, please see the ‘‘Public
Participation’’ heading in the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of
this document.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Todd Owen, Directorate of Standards
and Guidance, OSHA, Room N–3609,
200 Constitution Avenue, NW.,
Washington, DC 20210, telephone: (202)
693–2222.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
The Department of Labor, as part of its
continuing effort to reduce paperwork
and respondent (i.e., employer) burden,
conducts a preclearance consultation
program to provide the public with an
opportunity to comment on proposed
and continuing information collection
requirements in accordance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(PRA–95) (44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A)).
This program ensures that
information is in the desired format,
reporting burden (time and costs) is
VerDate Aug<18>2005
17:26 Aug 31, 2005
Jkt 205001
minimal, collection instruments are
clearly understood, and OSHA’s
estimate of the information collection
burden is accurate. The Occupational
Safety and Health Act of 1970 (the Act)
(29 U.S.C. 651 et seq.) authorizes
information collection by employers as
necessary or appropriate for
enforcement of the Act or for developing
information regarding the causes and
prevention of occupational injuries,
illnesses, and accidents (29 U.S.C. 657).
On January 5, 2005, OSHA published
the Standards Improvement Project—
Phase II, Final rule (70 FR 1112). The
final rule removed and revised
provisions of standards that were
outdated, duplicative, unnecessary, or
inconsistent and clarified or simplified
regulatory language. The final rule
contained several revisions to
collections of information contained in
the DBCP Standard. These revisions
included: updating compliance plans;
allowing employers the option to post
employee exposure-monitoring results
instead of requiring individual
notification; and eliminating the need
for employers to report emergencies to
OSHA and to notify OSHA when
establishing a regulated area. Those
changes reduced paperwork burden
hours while maintaining worker
protection and improving consistency
among standards.
The information collection
requirements specified in the DBCP
Standard protect employees from the
adverse health effects that may result
from their exposure to DBCP. The 1,2Dibromo-3-Chloropropane standard
requires employers to: Monitor
employees’ exposure to DBCP; monitor
employee health; and medical records;
and provide employees with
information about their exposures and
health effects of exposure to DBCP.
II. Special Issues for Comment
OSHA has a particular interest in
comments on the following issues:
• Whether the proposed information
collection requirements are necessary
for the proper information of the
Agency’s functions, including whether
the information is useful;
• The accuracy of OSHA’s estimate of
the burden (time and costs) of the
information collection requirements,
including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used;
• The quality, utility, and clarity of
the information collected; and
• Ways to minimize the burden on
employers who must comply; for
example, by using automated or other
technological information collection
and transmission techniques.
PO 00000
Frm 00068
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
52133
III. Proposed Actions
OSHA proposes to extend the Office
of Management and Budget’s (OMB)
approval of these collections of
information (paperwork) requirements
necessitated by the DBCP standard (29
CFR 1910.1044). The Agency will
include this summary in its request to
OMB to extend the approval of these
collections of information requirements.
Type of Review: Extension of
currently approved information
collection requirements.
Title: 1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane
Standard.
OMB Number: 1218–0101.
Affected Public: Business or other forprofits; Federal Government; State,
Local or Tribal Government.
Frequency: On occasion.
Average Time Per Response: 0.
Estimated Total Burden Hours: 1.
Estimated Cost (Operation and
Maintenance): $0.
IV. Public Participation—Submission of
Comments on This Notice and Internet
Access to Comments and Submissions
You may submit comments and
supporting materials in response to this
notice by (1) hard copy, (2) FAX
transmission (facsimile), or (3)
electronically through the OSHA
Webpage. Because of security-related
problems, there may be a significant
delay in the receipt of comments by
regular mail. Please contact the OSHA
Docket Office at (202) 693–2350 (TTY
(877) 889–5627) for information about
security procedures concerning the
delivery of submission by express
delivery, hand delivery and courier
service.
All comments, submissions and
background documents are available for
inspection and copying at the OSHA
Docket Office at the above address.
Comments and submissions posted on
OSHA’s Web page are available at
https://www.OSHA.gov. Contact the
OSHA Docket Office for information
about materials not available through
the OSHA Web page and for assistance
using the Web page to locate docket
submissions.
Electronic copies of this Federal
Register notice as well as other relevant
documents are available on OSHA’s
Web page. Since all submission become
public, private information such as
social security numbers should not be
submitted.
V. Authority and Signature
Jonathan L. Snare, Deputy Assistant
Secretary of Labor for Occupational
Safety and Health, directed the
preparation of this notice. The authority
E:\FR\FM\01SEN1.SGM
01SEN1
52134
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 169 / Thursday, September 1, 2005 / Notices
for this notice is the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3506
et seq.), and Secretary of Labor’s Order
No. 5–2002 (67 FR 65008).
Signed at Washington, DC, on August 29,
2005.
Jonathan L. Snare,
Deputy Assistant Secretary of Labor.
[FR Doc. 05–17438 Filed 8–31–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–26–M
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Occupational Safety and Health
Administration
[Docket No. ICR–1218–0072(2005)]
Hazard Communication Standard;
Extension of the Office of Management
and Budget’s (OMB) Approval of
Information Collection (Paperwork)
Requirements
Occupational Safety and Health
Administration (OSHA), Labor.
ACTION: Request for comment.
AGENCY:
OSHA solicits comments
concerning its proposal to extend OMB
approval of the information collection
requirements contained in the Hazard
Communication Standard (29 CFR
1910.1200; 1915.1200; 1917.28; 1918.90;
1926.59; and 1928.21).
DATES: Comments must be submitted by
the following dates:
Hard copy: Your comments must be
submitted (postmarked or received) by
October 31, 2005.
Facsimile and electronic
transmission: Your comments must be
received by October 31, 2005.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by OSHA Docket No. ICR–
1218–0072(2005), by any of the
following methods:
Regular mail, express delivery, hand
delivery, and messenger service: Submit
your comments and attachments to the
OSHA Docket Office, Room N–2625,
U.S. Department of Labor, 200
Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington,
DC 20210; telephone (202) 693–2350
(OSHA’s TTY number is (877) 889–
5627). OSHA Docket Office and
Department of Labor hours are 8:15 a.m.
to 4:45 p.m. e.t.
Facsimile: If your comments are 10
pages or fewer in length, including
attachments, you may fax them to
OSHA Docket Office at (202) 693–1648.
Electronic: You may submit
comments through the Internet at
https://ecomments.osha.gov/. Follow
instructions on the OSHA Web page for
submitting comments.
Docket: For access to the docket to
read or download comments or
SUMMARY:
VerDate Aug<18>2005
16:30 Aug 31, 2005
Jkt 205001
background materials, such as the
complete Information Collection
Request (ICR) (containing the
Supporting Statement, OMB–83–I Form,
and attachments), go to OSHA’s Web
page at https://www.OSHA.gov. In
addition, the ICR, comments, and
submissions are available for inspection
and copying at the OSHA Docket Office
at the above address. You also may
contact Todd Owen at the address
below to obtain a copy of the ICR.
(For additional information on
submitting comments, please see the
‘‘Public Participation’’ heading in the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of
this document.)
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Todd Owen, Directorate of Standards
and Guidance, OSHA, Room N–3609,
U.S. Department of Labor, 200
Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington,
DC 20210; telephone (202) 693–2222.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
The Department of Labor, as part of its
continuing effort to reduce paperwork
and respondent (i.e., employer) burden,
conducts a preclearance consultation
program to provide the public with an
opportunity to comment on proposed
and continuing information collection
requirements in accordance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(PRA–95) (44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A)). This
program ensures that information is in
the desired format, reporting burden
(time and costs) is minimal, collection
instruments are clearly understood, and
OSHA’s estimate of the information
collection burden is accurate. The
Occupational Safety and Health Act of
1970 (the Act) (29 U.S.C. 651 et seq.)
authorizes information collection by
employers as necessary or appropriate
for enforcement of the Act or for
developing information regarding the
causes and prevention of occupational
injuries, illnesses, and accidents (29
U.S.C. 657).
The information collection
requirements in the Hazard
Communication Standard (‘‘the
Standard’’) ensure that the hazards of
chemicals produced or imported are
evaluated, and that information
concerning these hazards is transmitted
to downstream employers and their
employees. The Standard requires
chemical manufacturers and importers
to evaluate chemicals they produce or
import to determine if they are
hazardous; for those chemicals
determined to be hazardous, they must
develop material safety data sheets and
warning labels. Employers are required
to establish hazard communication
PO 00000
Frm 00069
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
programs to transmit information on the
hazards of chemicals to their employees
by means of labels on containers,
material safety data sheets, and training
programs.
Implementation of these collection of
information requirements will ensure
that employees understand the hazards
and identities of the chemicals to which
they are exposed, thereby reducing the
incidence of chemically-related
occupational illnesses and injuries.
II. Special Issues for Comment
OSHA has a particular interest in
comments on the following issues:
• Whether the proposed information
collection requirements are necessary
for the proper performance of the
Agency’s functions, including whether
the information is useful;
• The accuracy of OSHA’s estimate of
the burden (time and costs) of the
information collection requirements,
including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used;
• The quality, utility, and clarity of
the information collected; and
• Ways to minimize the burden on
employers who must comply; for
example, by using automated or other
technological information collection
and transmission techniques.
III. Proposed Actions
OSHA proposes to extend the Office
of Management and Budget’s (OMB)
approval of the collection of information
(paperwork) requirements necessitated
by the Hazard Communication Standard
(29 CFR 1910.1200; 1915.1200; 1917.28;
1918.90; 1926.59; and 1928.21). The
Agency is requesting a 3 million hour
increase adjustment, mainly as a result
of increasing the estimated number of
affected nonmanufacturing
establishments.
The Agency will summarize the
comments submitted in response to this
notice, and will include this summary
in its request to OMB to extend the
approval of the collection of information
requirements contained in the Standard.
Type of Review: Extension of
currently approved information
collection requirements.
Title: Hazard Communication
Standard (29 CFR 1910.1200; 1915.1200;
1917.28; 1918.90; 1926.59; and
1928.21).
OMB Number: 1218–0072.
Affected Public: Business or other forprofits; not-for-profit institutions;
Federal government; State, local, or
tribal governments.
Number of Respondents: 3,238,532.
Frequency of Response: On occasion.
Total Responses: 475,375,321.
Average Time per Response: Varies
from 12 seconds for establishments to
E:\FR\FM\01SEN1.SGM
01SEN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 169 (Thursday, September 1, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 52132-52134]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-17438]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Occupational Safety and Health Administration
[Docket No. ICR-1218-0101(2005)]
1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane (DBCP) Standard; Extension of the
Office of Management and Budget's (OMB) Approval of Information
Collection (Paperwork) Requirements
AGENCY: Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), Labor.
ACTION: Request for public comment.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: OSHA solicits public comment concerning its request for an
extension of the information collection requirements contained in the
1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane Standard (the ``DBCP'' Standard) (29 CFR
1910.1044).
DATES: Comment must be submitted by the following dates:
Hard copy: Your comments must be submitted (postmarked or received)
by October 31, 2005.
[[Page 52133]]
Facsimile and electronic transmission: Your comments must be
received by October 31, 2005.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by OSHA Docket No. ICR-
1218-0101(2005), by any of the following methods:
Regular mail, express delivery, hand delivery, and messenger
service: Submit your comments and attachments to the OSHA Docket
Office, Room N-2625, U.S. Department of Labor, 200 Constitution Avenue,
NW., Washington, DC 20210; telephone (202) 693-2350 (OSHA's TTY number
is (877) 889-5627). OSHA Docket Office and Department of Labor hours
are 8:15 a.m. to 4:45 p.m., e.t.
Facsimile: If your comments are 10 pages or fewer in length,
including attachments, you may fax them to the OSHA Docket Office at
(202) 693-1648.
Electronic: You may submit comments through the Internet at https://
ecomments.osha.gov. Follow instructions on the OSHA Webpage for
submitting comments.
Docket: For access to the docket to read or download comments or
background materials, such as the complete Information Collection
Request (ICR) (Containing the Supporting Statement, OMB-83-I Form, and
attachments), go to OSHA's Web page at https://www.OSHA.gov. In
addition, the ICR, comments and submissions are available for
inspection and copying at the OSHA Docket Office at the address above.
You may also contact Todd Owen at the address below to obtain a copy of
the ICR. For additional information on submitting comments, please see
the ``Public Participation'' heading in the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
section of this document.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Todd Owen, Directorate of Standards
and Guidance, OSHA, Room N-3609, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW.,
Washington, DC 20210, telephone: (202) 693-2222.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
The Department of Labor, as part of its continuing effort to reduce
paperwork and respondent (i.e., employer) burden, conducts a
preclearance consultation program to provide the public with an
opportunity to comment on proposed and continuing information
collection requirements in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act
of 1995 (PRA-95) (44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A)).
This program ensures that information is in the desired format,
reporting burden (time and costs) is minimal, collection instruments
are clearly understood, and OSHA's estimate of the information
collection burden is accurate. The Occupational Safety and Health Act
of 1970 (the Act) (29 U.S.C. 651 et seq.) authorizes information
collection by employers as necessary or appropriate for enforcement of
the Act or for developing information regarding the causes and
prevention of occupational injuries, illnesses, and accidents (29
U.S.C. 657).
On January 5, 2005, OSHA published the Standards Improvement
Project--Phase II, Final rule (70 FR 1112). The final rule removed and
revised provisions of standards that were outdated, duplicative,
unnecessary, or inconsistent and clarified or simplified regulatory
language. The final rule contained several revisions to collections of
information contained in the DBCP Standard. These revisions included:
updating compliance plans; allowing employers the option to post
employee exposure-monitoring results instead of requiring individual
notification; and eliminating the need for employers to report
emergencies to OSHA and to notify OSHA when establishing a regulated
area. Those changes reduced paperwork burden hours while maintaining
worker protection and improving consistency among standards.
The information collection requirements specified in the DBCP
Standard protect employees from the adverse health effects that may
result from their exposure to DBCP. The 1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane
standard requires employers to: Monitor employees' exposure to DBCP;
monitor employee health; and medical records; and provide employees
with information about their exposures and health effects of exposure
to DBCP.
II. Special Issues for Comment
OSHA has a particular interest in comments on the following issues:
Whether the proposed information collection requirements
are necessary for the proper information of the Agency's functions,
including whether the information is useful;
The accuracy of OSHA's estimate of the burden (time and
costs) of the information collection requirements, including the
validity of the methodology and assumptions used;
The quality, utility, and clarity of the information
collected; and
Ways to minimize the burden on employers who must comply;
for example, by using automated or other technological information
collection and transmission techniques.
III. Proposed Actions
OSHA proposes to extend the Office of Management and Budget's (OMB)
approval of these collections of information (paperwork) requirements
necessitated by the DBCP standard (29 CFR 1910.1044). The Agency will
include this summary in its request to OMB to extend the approval of
these collections of information requirements.
Type of Review: Extension of currently approved information
collection requirements.
Title: 1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane Standard.
OMB Number: 1218-0101.
Affected Public: Business or other for-profits; Federal Government;
State, Local or Tribal Government.
Frequency: On occasion.
Average Time Per Response: 0.
Estimated Total Burden Hours: 1.
Estimated Cost (Operation and Maintenance): $0.
IV. Public Participation--Submission of Comments on This Notice and
Internet Access to Comments and Submissions
You may submit comments and supporting materials in response to
this notice by (1) hard copy, (2) FAX transmission (facsimile), or (3)
electronically through the OSHA Webpage. Because of security-related
problems, there may be a significant delay in the receipt of comments
by regular mail. Please contact the OSHA Docket Office at (202) 693-
2350 (TTY (877) 889-5627) for information about security procedures
concerning the delivery of submission by express delivery, hand
delivery and courier service.
All comments, submissions and background documents are available
for inspection and copying at the OSHA Docket Office at the above
address. Comments and submissions posted on OSHA's Web page are
available at https://www.OSHA.gov. Contact the OSHA Docket Office for
information about materials not available through the OSHA Web page and
for assistance using the Web page to locate docket submissions.
Electronic copies of this Federal Register notice as well as other
relevant documents are available on OSHA's Web page. Since all
submission become public, private information such as social security
numbers should not be submitted.
V. Authority and Signature
Jonathan L. Snare, Deputy Assistant Secretary of Labor for
Occupational Safety and Health, directed the preparation of this
notice. The authority
[[Page 52134]]
for this notice is the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3506
et seq.), and Secretary of Labor's Order No. 5-2002 (67 FR 65008).
Signed at Washington, DC, on August 29, 2005.
Jonathan L. Snare,
Deputy Assistant Secretary of Labor.
[FR Doc. 05-17438 Filed 8-31-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-26-M
