Agency Information Collection Activities: Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request, 51358-51360 [05-17178]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
51358
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 167 / Tuesday, August 30, 2005 / Notices
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Substance Abuse and Mental Health
Services Administration
Agency Information Collection
Activities: Submission for OMB
Review; Comment Request
Periodically, the Substance Abuse and
Mental Health Services Administration
(SAMHSA) will publish a summary of
information collection requests under
OMB review, in compliance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C.
Chapter 35). To request a copy of these
documents, call the SAMHSA Reports
Clearance Officer on (240) 276–1243.
Project: National Outcome Measures for
Substance Abuse Prevention (OMB No.
0930–0230)—Revision
Given SAMHSA’s emphasis on
reducing burden and limiting required
measures, CSAP has proposed a greatly
reduced OMB clearance package that
would include a small set of required
measures. Seven optional measures are
also included under this proposed
approach and are indicated by an
asterisk (*). CSAP would like to
characterize this set of measures as the
NOMs for prevention. Honoring our
agreement with the States, these
optional and required NOMs may be
modified based upon further dialogue
with the States as NOMs
implementation proceeds. In addition to
requesting approval to collect data using
four current GPRA measures (30 day
use, age of first use, disapproval,
perceived risk), CSAP has added the
following:
Abstinence
Binge Drinking.* Binge drinking is
distinct from past 30 day use in that it
involves dangerous amounts of alcohol
consumption on any given occasion.
Binge drinking is a public health
concern because it is widespread among
young adults and adolescents and
contributes directly to injuries and
fatalities. Evidence-based prevention
strategies, programs, and policies exist
to reduce binge drinking, with several
programs focusing on binge drinking on
college campuses. SAMHSA currently
supports a nation-wide underage
drinking initiative, which includes a
focus on reducing binge drinking among
our youth. The NSDUH, Youth Risk
Behavior Survey (YRBS), Behavioral
Risk Factor Surveillance System
(BRFSS) are nearly identical and ask the
number of times during the past 30 days
that the respondent had five or more
drinks on a single occasion or within a
VerDate Aug<18>2005
15:17 Aug 29, 2005
Jkt 205001
couple of hours. The MTF and College
Alcohol Study ask the same question,
but use the past two weeks as the
reference period. The College Alcohol
Survey also asks how many times the
respondent had four drinks. Given the
similarity of these measures, CSAP
recommends the NSDUH measure for
consistency with our other NOMs.
Perceived Availability.* Perceived
availability of alcohol and illicit drugs
is associated with alcohol and illicit
drug consumption. Perceived
availability is distinct from other NOM
correlates of substance use (e.g.,
perceived risk) because it provides
insight into respondents’ beliefs
regarding environmental conditions that
may affect substance use. Efforts to
reduce availability (perceived or real)
have been shown to reduce
consumption and consequences of
alcohol and illicit drug use. CSAP
recommends including perceived
availability because of its strong
association with alcohol and illicit drug
use correlation with alcohol use = .44;
marijuana use = .33) and prevalence in
prevention programming. CSAP
recommends the NSDUH measure on
perceived availability of illicit drugs
because data are collected annually and
this would be consistent with our other
NOM measures (.27–.45 correlation w/
use).
Criminal Involvement
Antisocial Behavior*. Antisocial/
delinquent behavior is predictive of
involvement in the criminal justice
system and is correlated with substance
use. Therefore, it is relevant to measures
this construct within this domain,
particularly among adolescents who
may not yet be involved in the criminal
justice system. Antisocial/delinquent
behavior is distinct from other NOM
constructs (e.g., drug-related crime) in
that it addresses a broad set of problem
behaviors, rather than a more narrow set
of behaviors that result in arrest or
adjudication. CSAP recommends
including antisocial and delinquent
behavior because these behaviors are
predictive of involvement in the
criminal justice system and are
correlated with substance use (alcohol =
23; marijuana = .29). Many evidencebased substance abuse prevention
programs target antisocial/delinquent
violent behaviors (.23–.375 correlation
w/use), especially those for selective
and indicated populations.
Epidemiologic measures from state and
community level sources (AOD related
car crashes, police reports on drug
related incidents) are not appropriate
performance measures for those more
targeted, direct service types of
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
programs. This is why we are
recommending the survey measures
from the NSDUH.
Alcohol and drug related arrests.*
According to the most recent NSDUH
survey results ‘‘* * * youths in 2003
were more likely to have used an illicit
drug in the past month if they carried
a handgun (32.5 vs. 10.4 percent), sold
illegal drugs (67.0 vs. 9.1 percent), or
stolen or tried to steal something worth
$50 or more (39.1 vs. 9.9 percent)’’.
Clearly, the relationship between
criminal conduct while using
substances is an accepted fact. For
programs that are targeting risk factors
that underlie both substance use and
illegal behavior, this is an extremely
pertinent performance measure. This
NSDUH survey measure is particularly
important for programs that are selective
or indicated, because the other
community level (epidemiological)
NOM data will likely not reflect their
performance.
Social Support/Social Connectedness
(Currently on the NOM Web site as
Under Development)
Community Involvement.*
Community involvement is associated
with social support and social
connectedness and, therefore, is a
relevant construct to measure within
this domain. For example, increased
community involvement was associated
with improved family interactions and
parent attitude (Substance Abuse
Prevention Evaluation Outcomes Fiscal
Year 2004, New Mexico Department of
Health Publication, October 2004)
CSAP recommends including
community involvement because of this
relationship. There was discussion
about the construct itself and what it
means to be involved in one’s
community. There are a number of ways
to measure community involvement,
such as participation in many different
types of activities, or pursuing a few
activities with commitment. In order to
keep the data source consistent and be
assured of obtaining national and state
level data, CSAP recommends the
NSDUH prevention measures for
assessing actual participation in
community activities.
Collective Efficacy *. Collective
efficacy refers to the extent to which
community members feel that they
monitor their neighborhoods, look after
each other, and share common values.
Perhaps, because measurement in the
area of collective efficacy is fairly new,
it was difficult to find data to support
or refute the idea that it is associated
with substance use. However, it is
clearly reflective of the purpose of the
Drug Free Communities program, and
E:\FR\FM\30AUN1.SGM
30AUN1
51359
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 167 / Tuesday, August 30, 2005 / Notices
CSAP/SAMHSA’s philosophical and
practical focus regarding coalition
building and other empowerment
infrastructure activities. Because of its
accessibility in the public domain,
CSAP recommends the NSDUH measure
of collective efficacy as a prevention
outcome measure. It has a high
reliability (greater than .80) as a
cohesive measure.
Family Communication*. Positive
parent-child communication is an
objective of family-based prevention
interventions. The family is emphasized
by this administration, and is ‘‘the antidrug’’ in ONDCP campaigns. Research
has shown that family factors play an
important role in the etiology of
substance abuse, as well as the positive
development of children and youth
(Spoth, Kavanagh, & Dishion, 2002). In
addition, family- and parent-centered
prevention interventions have been
developed, evaluated, and disseminated
in ever increasing numbers during the
last decade (e.g., Bauman et al., 2001;
Dishion & Kavanagh, 2000; Spoth,
Redmond, & Shin, 2001). CSAP
recommends the NSDUH items
regarding family communications
specifically about drug abuse. The
NSDUH includes one item for children
(During the past 12 months, have you
talked with at least one of your parents
about the dangers of tobacco, alcohol, or
drug use?), and two for parents (During
the past 12 months, how many times
have you talked with your child about
the dangers or problems associated with
the use of tobacco, alcohol, or other
drugs? Think about the most serious and
thorough discussion about drugs you
had with your child during the past 12
months. About how long did this
discussion last?). These one- and twoitem measures have merit for prevention
because they ask specifically about
conversations regarding ATOD and they
are collected annually. (.20–.27
correlation w/use)
CSAP believes that these measures are
necessary to include as NOMs based on
its long history working with states,
communities and prevention providers,
and on input from its Data Coordinating
Center and outside expert panels who
made recommendations based on a
review of existing measures using
standard criteria. Additionally, we
believe that these measures can be
collected at the national, state, substate
and/or program level as appropriate,
providing the consistency of
measurement towards which we strive.
Additional NOMs epidemiologic
measures t are already collected by
other agencies and no burden will be
posed to SAMHSA/CSAP grantees. The
measures will be used as follows:
National/State: Outcome trend
measures to identify need and monitor
global effectiveness at the population
level, for the purpose of informing
federal resource allocation decisions.
Community: Outcome trend measures
to (1) determine need and target
resources to communities at greatest
risk, (2) track performance of universal
programs and environmental strategies.
The data will inform allocation of
community resources.
Program: Outcome pre/post measures
to assess program performance of direct
service programs at the individual
program participant level.
Domain
NOM
Abstinence ....................................................................
30 day substance use: nonuse/reduction in use (1);
Age of first use; Perception of disapproval/attitude
(1); Perceived risk/harm of use (1); Binge
drinking*; Perceived availability*.
Workplace AOD use and perception of workplace
policy (adult);
ATOD-related suspensions and expulsions (youth) ...
Alcohol related car crashes and injuries ....................
Drug related crime ......................................................
Alcohol and drug related arrests*; Antisocial
behavior*.
N/A
# of persons served by age, gender, race, ethnicity ..
Total # evidence based programs and strategies ......
Collective efficacy*; Community Involvement*; Family
communication-drug use*.
Increase services provided within cost bands (within
universal, selective and indicated programs).1
Total # of evidence based programs and strategies.1
Employment/Education .................................................
Crime and Criminal Justice ..........................................
Stability in Housing .......................................................
Access/Service Capacity
Retention ......................................................................
Social Support/Social Connectedness .........................
Cost Effectiveness ........................................................
Use of Evidence Based Practices ................................
Data source
NSDUH.
NSDUH.
DofED RECORDS.
FARS.
UCR.
NSDUH.
MDS.
MDS.
NSDUH.
Template (under development).
MDS.
1 PART
measure.
Notes.—(Other Part measures for CSAP): past year use: BG.
# practices reviewed and approved NREP: PRNS.
Percent states satisfied w/TA: BG.
Number of
grantees
SAMHSA/CSAP program
Responses/
grantee
Hours/
response
Total hours
FY05
Knowledge Development:
Club drugs/Methamphetamine ..................................................................
Fetal Alcohol .............................................................................................
Workplace .................................................................................................
Targeted Capacity Enhancement:
HIV/Targeted Capacity .............................................................................
SPF SIG ...................................................................................................
22
6
13
2
2
2
3
3
3
132
36
78
45
21
2
2
3
3
270
126
FY05 Total .........................................................................................
106
........................
........................
642
FY06
Knowledge Development:
Club Drugs/Methamphetamine .................................................................
22
2
3
132
VerDate Aug<18>2005
15:17 Aug 29, 2005
Jkt 205001
PO 00000
Frm 00032
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\30AUN1.SGM
30AUN1
51360
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 167 / Tuesday, August 30, 2005 / Notices
Number of
grantees
SAMHSA/CSAP program
Responses/
grantee
Hours/
response
Total hours
Fetal Alcohol .............................................................................................
Workplace .................................................................................................
Targeted Capacity Enhancement:
HIV/Targeted Capacity .............................................................................
SPF SIG ...................................................................................................
6
13
2
2
3
3
36
78
45
40
2
2
3
3
270
240
FY06 Total .........................................................................................
126
........................
........................
756
FY07
Knowledge Development:
Club Drugs/Methamphetamine .................................................................
Fetal Alcohol .............................................................................................
Workplace .................................................................................................
Targeted Capacity Enhancement:
HIV/Targeted Capacity .............................................................................
SPF SIG ...................................................................................................
22
6
13
2
2
2
3
3
3
132
36
78
45
50
2
2
3
3
270
300
FY07 Total .........................................................................................
136
........................
........................
816
3-Year Annual Average .....................................................................
123
........................
........................
736
Written comments and
recommendations concerning the
proposed information collection should
be sent by September 29, 2005 to:
SAMHSA Desk Officer, Human
Resources and Housing Branch, Office
of Management and Budget, New
Executive Office Building, Room 10235,
Washington, DC. 20503; due to potential
delays in OMB’s receipt and processing
of mail sent through the U.S. Postal
Service, respondents are encouraged to
submit comments by fax to: 202–395–
6974.
Dated: August 23, 2005.
Anna Marsh,
Executive Officer, SAMHSA.
[FR Doc. 05–17178 Filed 8–29–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4162–20–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
[USCG–2005–22234]
National Offshore Safety Advisory
Committee
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice of meeting.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
Agenda of Meetings
The National Offshore Safety
Advisory Committee (NOSAC) and its
Liftboat III Subcommittee will meet to
discuss various issues relating to
offshore safety and security. Both
meetings will be open to the public.
DATES: NOSAC will meet on Thursday,
October 6, 2005, from 9 a.m. to 3 p.m.
The Liftboat III Subcommittee will meet
on Wednesday, October 5, 2005, from
1:30 p.m. to 3 p.m. These meetings may
close early if all business is finished.
SUMMARY:
VerDate Aug<18>2005
15:17 Aug 29, 2005
Written material and requests to make
oral presentations should reach the
Coast Guard on or before September 22,
2005. Requests to have a copy of your
material distributed to each member of
the committee should reach the Coast
Guard on or before September 22, 2005.
ADDRESSES: NOSAC will meet in
‘‘Ballroom C/D’’ of the Hilton New
Orleans Airport hotel, 901 Airline Drive,
Kenner, Louisiana. The Liftboat III
Subcommittee will meet in the
‘‘Segnette’’ room of the same hotel. Send
written material and requests to make
oral presentations to Commander J. M.
Cushing, Commandant (G–MSO–2), U.S.
Coast Guard Headquarters, 2100 Second
Street SW., Washington, DC 20593–
0001. This notice is available on the
Internet at https://dms.dot.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Commander J. M. Cushing, Executive
Director of NOSAC, or Mr. Jim Magill,
Assistant to the Executive Director,
telephone 202–267–1082, fax 202–267–
4570.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice of
the meetings is given under the Federal
Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App.
2.
Jkt 205001
National Offshore Safety Advisory
Committee. The agenda includes the
following:
(1) Report on issues concerning the
International Maritime Organization and
the International Organization for
Standardization.
(2) Report from Subcommittee on
Safety of Life at Sea (SOLAS)
compliance of U.S. flagged Offshore
Support Vessels including Liftboats.
(3) Report from the Liftboat III
Subcommittee on Liftboat Licenses.
PO 00000
Frm 00033
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
(4) Offshore Helidecks—new and
revised API and ICAO standards.
(5) Revision of 33 CFR Chapter I,
Subchapter N, Outer Continental Shelf
activities.
(6) 33 CFR Chapter I, Subchapter NN,
Temporary Final Rule on Deepwater
Ports, and status of license submissions
for LNG deepwater ports.
Liftboat III Subcommittee. The agenda
includes the following:
(1) Review and discuss previous
work.
(2) Review Offshore Marine Service
Association (OMSA) Liftboat Training
outline.
(2) Review Final Report of answers to
NOSAC Task Statement on Liftboat
Licensing.
Procedural
The meeting is open to the public.
Please note that the meeting may close
early if all business is finished. At the
Chair’s discretion, members of the
public may make oral presentations
during the meeting. If you would like to
make an oral presentation at the
meeting, please notify the Executive
Director no later than September 22,
2005. Written material for distribution
at the meeting should reach the Coast
Guard no later than September 22, 2005.
If you would like a copy of your
material distributed to each member of
the committee in advance of the
meeting, please submit 25 copies to the
Executive Director no later than
September 22, 2005.
Information on Services for Individuals
With Disabilities
For information on facilities or
services for individuals with disabilities
or to request special assistance at the
E:\FR\FM\30AUN1.SGM
30AUN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 167 (Tuesday, August 30, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 51358-51360]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-17178]
[[Page 51358]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration
Agency Information Collection Activities: Submission for OMB
Review; Comment Request
Periodically, the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services
Administration (SAMHSA) will publish a summary of information
collection requests under OMB review, in compliance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35). To request a copy of these
documents, call the SAMHSA Reports Clearance Officer on (240) 276-1243.
Project: National Outcome Measures for Substance Abuse Prevention (OMB
No. 0930-0230)--Revision
Given SAMHSA's emphasis on reducing burden and limiting required
measures, CSAP has proposed a greatly reduced OMB clearance package
that would include a small set of required measures. Seven optional
measures are also included under this proposed approach and are
indicated by an asterisk (*). CSAP would like to characterize this set
of measures as the NOMs for prevention. Honoring our agreement with the
States, these optional and required NOMs may be modified based upon
further dialogue with the States as NOMs implementation proceeds. In
addition to requesting approval to collect data using four current GPRA
measures (30 day use, age of first use, disapproval, perceived risk),
CSAP has added the following:
Abstinence
Binge Drinking.\*\ Binge drinking is distinct from past 30 day use
in that it involves dangerous amounts of alcohol consumption on any
given occasion. Binge drinking is a public health concern because it is
widespread among young adults and adolescents and contributes directly
to injuries and fatalities. Evidence-based prevention strategies,
programs, and policies exist to reduce binge drinking, with several
programs focusing on binge drinking on college campuses. SAMHSA
currently supports a nation-wide underage drinking initiative, which
includes a focus on reducing binge drinking among our youth. The NSDUH,
Youth Risk Behavior Survey (YRBS), Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance
System (BRFSS) are nearly identical and ask the number of times during
the past 30 days that the respondent had five or more drinks on a
single occasion or within a couple of hours. The MTF and College
Alcohol Study ask the same question, but use the past two weeks as the
reference period. The College Alcohol Survey also asks how many times
the respondent had four drinks. Given the similarity of these measures,
CSAP recommends the NSDUH measure for consistency with our other NOMs.
Perceived Availability.\*\ Perceived availability of alcohol and
illicit drugs is associated with alcohol and illicit drug consumption.
Perceived availability is distinct from other NOM correlates of
substance use (e.g., perceived risk) because it provides insight into
respondents' beliefs regarding environmental conditions that may affect
substance use. Efforts to reduce availability (perceived or real) have
been shown to reduce consumption and consequences of alcohol and
illicit drug use. CSAP recommends including perceived availability
because of its strong association with alcohol and illicit drug use
correlation with alcohol use = .44; marijuana use = .33) and prevalence
in prevention programming. CSAP recommends the NSDUH measure on
perceived availability of illicit drugs because data are collected
annually and this would be consistent with our other NOM measures
(.27-.45 correlation w/ use).
Criminal Involvement
Antisocial Behavior\*\. Antisocial/delinquent behavior is
predictive of involvement in the criminal justice system and is
correlated with substance use. Therefore, it is relevant to measures
this construct within this domain, particularly among adolescents who
may not yet be involved in the criminal justice system. Antisocial/
delinquent behavior is distinct from other NOM constructs (e.g., drug-
related crime) in that it addresses a broad set of problem behaviors,
rather than a more narrow set of behaviors that result in arrest or
adjudication. CSAP recommends including antisocial and delinquent
behavior because these behaviors are predictive of involvement in the
criminal justice system and are correlated with substance use (alcohol
= 23; marijuana = .29). Many evidence-based substance abuse prevention
programs target antisocial/delinquent violent behaviors (.23-.375
correlation w/use), especially those for selective and indicated
populations. Epidemiologic measures from state and community level
sources (AOD related car crashes, police reports on drug related
incidents) are not appropriate performance measures for those more
targeted, direct service types of programs. This is why we are
recommending the survey measures from the NSDUH.
Alcohol and drug related arrests.\*\ According to the most recent
NSDUH survey results ``* * * youths in 2003 were more likely to have
used an illicit drug in the past month if they carried a handgun (32.5
vs. 10.4 percent), sold illegal drugs (67.0 vs. 9.1 percent), or stolen
or tried to steal something worth $50 or more (39.1 vs. 9.9 percent)''.
Clearly, the relationship between criminal conduct while using
substances is an accepted fact. For programs that are targeting risk
factors that underlie both substance use and illegal behavior, this is
an extremely pertinent performance measure. This NSDUH survey measure
is particularly important for programs that are selective or indicated,
because the other community level (epidemiological) NOM data will
likely not reflect their performance.
Social Support/Social Connectedness (Currently on the NOM Web site as
Under Development)
Community Involvement.\*\ Community involvement is associated with
social support and social connectedness and, therefore, is a relevant
construct to measure within this domain. For example, increased
community involvement was associated with improved family interactions
and parent attitude (Substance Abuse Prevention Evaluation Outcomes
Fiscal Year 2004, New Mexico Department of Health Publication, October
2004)
CSAP recommends including community involvement because of this
relationship. There was discussion about the construct itself and what
it means to be involved in one's community. There are a number of ways
to measure community involvement, such as participation in many
different types of activities, or pursuing a few activities with
commitment. In order to keep the data source consistent and be assured
of obtaining national and state level data, CSAP recommends the NSDUH
prevention measures for assessing actual participation in community
activities.
Collective Efficacy \*\. Collective efficacy refers to the extent
to which community members feel that they monitor their neighborhoods,
look after each other, and share common values. Perhaps, because
measurement in the area of collective efficacy is fairly new, it was
difficult to find data to support or refute the idea that it is
associated with substance use. However, it is clearly reflective of the
purpose of the Drug Free Communities program, and
[[Page 51359]]
CSAP/SAMHSA's philosophical and practical focus regarding coalition
building and other empowerment infrastructure activities. Because of
its accessibility in the public domain, CSAP recommends the NSDUH
measure of collective efficacy as a prevention outcome measure. It has
a high reliability (greater than .80) as a cohesive measure.
Family Communication*. Positive parent-child
communication is an objective of family-based prevention interventions.
The family is emphasized by this administration, and is ``the anti-
drug'' in ONDCP campaigns. Research has shown that family factors play
an important role in the etiology of substance abuse, as well as the
positive development of children and youth (Spoth, Kavanagh, & Dishion,
2002). In addition, family- and parent-centered prevention
interventions have been developed, evaluated, and disseminated in ever
increasing numbers during the last decade (e.g., Bauman et al., 2001;
Dishion & Kavanagh, 2000; Spoth, Redmond, & Shin, 2001). CSAP
recommends the NSDUH items regarding family communications specifically
about drug abuse. The NSDUH includes one item for children (During the
past 12 months, have you talked with at least one of your parents about
the dangers of tobacco, alcohol, or drug use?), and two for parents
(During the past 12 months, how many times have you talked with your
child about the dangers or problems associated with the use of tobacco,
alcohol, or other drugs? Think about the most serious and thorough
discussion about drugs you had with your child during the past 12
months. About how long did this discussion last?). These one- and two-
item measures have merit for prevention because they ask specifically
about conversations regarding ATOD and they are collected annually.
(.20-.27 correlation w/use)
CSAP believes that these measures are necessary to include as NOMs
based on its long history working with states, communities and
prevention providers, and on input from its Data Coordinating Center
and outside expert panels who made recommendations based on a review of
existing measures using standard criteria. Additionally, we believe
that these measures can be collected at the national, state, substate
and/or program level as appropriate, providing the consistency of
measurement towards which we strive. Additional NOMs epidemiologic
measures t are already collected by other agencies and no burden will
be posed to SAMHSA/CSAP grantees. The measures will be used as follows:
National/State: Outcome trend measures to identify need and monitor
global effectiveness at the population level, for the purpose of
informing federal resource allocation decisions.
Community: Outcome trend measures to (1) determine need and target
resources to communities at greatest risk, (2) track performance of
universal programs and environmental strategies. The data will inform
allocation of community resources.
Program: Outcome pre/post measures to assess program performance of
direct service programs at the individual program participant level.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Domain NOM Data source
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Abstinence......................... 30 day substance use: NSDUH.
nonuse/reduction in use
(1); Age of first use;
Perception of disapproval/
attitude (1); Perceived
risk/harm of use (1);
Binge drinking*; Perceived
availability*.
Employment/Education............... Workplace AOD use and NSDUH.
perception of workplace
policy (adult);
ATOD-related suspensions DofED RECORDS.
and expulsions (youth).
Crime and Criminal Justice......... Alcohol related car crashes FARS.
and injuries.
Drug related crime......... UCR.
Alcohol and drug related NSDUH.
arrests*; Antisocial
behavior*.
Stability in Housing............... N/A
Access/Service Capacity of persons served MDS.
by age, gender, race,
ethnicity.
Retention.......................... Total evidence MDS.
based programs and
strategies.
Social Support/Social Connectedness Collective efficacy*; NSDUH.
Community Involvement*;
Family communication-drug
use*.
Cost Effectiveness................. Increase services provided Template (under development).
within cost bands (within
universal, selective and
indicated programs).\1\
Use of Evidence Based Practices.... Total of evidence MDS.
based programs and
strategies.\1\
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ PART measure.
Notes.--(Other Part measures for CSAP): past year use: BG.
practices reviewed and approved NREP: PRNS.
Percent states satisfied w/TA: BG.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Number of Responses/ Hours/
SAMHSA/CSAP program grantees grantee response Total hours
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FY05
Knowledge Development:
Club drugs/Methamphetamine.................. 22 2 3 132
Fetal Alcohol............................... 6 2 3 36
Workplace................................... 13 2 3 78
Targeted Capacity Enhancement:
HIV/Targeted Capacity....................... 45 2 3 270
SPF SIG..................................... 21 2 3 126
-----------------
FY05 Total.............................. 106 .............. .............. 642
=================
FY06
Knowledge Development:
Club Drugs/Methamphetamine.................. 22 2 3 132
[[Page 51360]]
Fetal Alcohol............................... 6 2 3 36
Workplace................................... 13 2 3 78
Targeted Capacity Enhancement:
HIV/Targeted Capacity....................... 45 2 3 270
SPF SIG..................................... 40 2 3 240
-----------------
FY06 Total.............................. 126 .............. .............. 756
=================
FY07
Knowledge Development:
Club Drugs/Methamphetamine.................. 22 2 3 132
Fetal Alcohol............................... 6 2 3 36
Workplace................................... 13 2 3 78
Targeted Capacity Enhancement:
HIV/Targeted Capacity....................... 45 2 3 270
SPF SIG..................................... 50 2 3 300
-----------------
FY07 Total.............................. 136 .............. .............. 816
=================
3-Year Annual Average................... 123 .............. .............. 736
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Written comments and recommendations concerning the proposed
information collection should be sent by September 29, 2005 to: SAMHSA
Desk Officer, Human Resources and Housing Branch, Office of Management
and Budget, New Executive Office Building, Room 10235, Washington, DC.
20503; due to potential delays in OMB's receipt and processing of mail
sent through the U.S. Postal Service, respondents are encouraged to
submit comments by fax to: 202-395-6974.
Dated: August 23, 2005.
Anna Marsh,
Executive Officer, SAMHSA.
[FR Doc. 05-17178 Filed 8-29-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4162-20-P
