Certain Non-Frozen Concentrated Apple Juice From China, 51365-51366 [05-17174]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 167 / Tuesday, August 30, 2005 / Notices explanatory information and related forms, contact John A. Trelease at the address listed in ADDRESSES. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: OMB regulations at 5 CFR 1320, which implement provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–13), require that interested members of the public and affected agencies have an opportunity to comment on information collection and recordkeeping activities [see 5 CFR 1320.8 (d)]. This notice identifies an information collection that OSM will be submitting to OMB for extension. This collection is contained in 30 CFR part 869, Abandoned Mine Reclamation Fund—Fee Collection and Coal Production Reporting and the form it implements, the OSM–1, Coal Reclamation Fee Report. This request consolidates these requirements with the excess moisture deduction provisions found in § 870.18, approved separately by OMB under control number 1029–0090. OSM has revised burden estimates, where appropriate, to reflect current reporting levels or adjustments based on reestimates of burden and respondents. OSM will request a 3-year term of approval for each information collection activity. Comments are invited on: (1) The need for the collection of information for the performance of the functions of the agency; (2) the accuracy of the agency’s burden estimates; (3) ways to enhance the quality, utility and clarity of the information collection; and (4) ways to minimize the information collection burden on respondents, such as use of automated means of collection of the information. A summary of the public comments will be included in OSM’s submissions of the information collection requests to OMB. This notice provides the public with 60 days in which to comment on the following information collection activities: Title: Abandoned Mine Reclamation Fund—Fee Collection and Coal Production Reporting, 30 CFR 870. OMB Control Number: 1029–0063. Summary: The information is used to maintain a record of coal produced for sale, transfer, or use nationwide each calendar quarter, the method of coal removal and the type of coal, and the basis for coal tonnage reporting in compliance with 30 CFR 870 and section 401 of P.L. 95–87. Individual reclamation fee payment liability is based on this information. Without the collection of information OSM could not implement its regulatory responsibilities and collect the fee. Bureau Form Number: OSM–1. VerDate Aug<18>2005 15:17 Aug 29, 2005 Jkt 205001 Frequency of Collection: Quarterly. Description of Respondents: Coal mine permittees. Total Annual Responses: 11,192. Total Annual Burden Hours: 2,462. Dated: August 24, 2005. John R. Craynon, Chief, Division of Regulatory Support. [FR Doc. 05–17187 Filed 8–29–05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4310–05–M INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation Nos. 701–TA–302 and 731– TA–454 (Second Review)] Fresh and Chilled Atlantic Salmon From Norway International Trade Commission. ACTION: Revised schedule for the subject five-year reviews. AGENCY: Effective Date: August 23, 2005. John Kitzmiller (202–205–3387), Office of Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436. Hearingimpaired persons can obtain information on this matter by contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202– 205–1810. Persons with mobility impairments who will need special assistance in gaining access to the Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at 202–205–2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server (https:// www.usitic.gov). The public record for these reviews may be viewed on the Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitic.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On June 20, 2005, the Commission established a schedule for the conduct of the subject five-year reviews (70 FR 36947, June 27, 2005). The Commission hereby gives notice that it is revising the schedule for its final determinations in the subject five-year reviews. The Commission’s schedule is revised as follows: The prehearing staff report will be placed in the nonpublic record on September 29, 2005; the deadline for filing prehearing briefs is October 11, 2005; requests to appear at the hearing should be filed with the Secretary to the Commission on or before October 12, 2005; the prehearing conference will be held on October 14, 2005; the hearing will be held on October 20, 2005; posthearing briefs are due October 31, 2005; the closing of the record and final DATES: FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: PO 00000 Frm 00038 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 51365 release of information is November 22, 2005; and final comments on this information are due on or before November 28, 2005. In addition, final party comments concerning only Commerce’s final results on its sunset review of the antidumping duty order on fresh and chilled Atlantic salmon from Norway are due three business days after the issuance of Commerce’s results. For further information concerning these review investigations see the Commission’s notice cited above and the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure, part 201, subparts A through E (19 CFR part 201), and part 207, subparts A and C (19 CFR part 207). Authority: These five-year reviews are being conducted under authority of title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930; this notice is published pursuant to section 207.21 of the Commission’s rules. By order of the Commission. Issued: August 24, 2005. Marilyn R. Abbot, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. 05–17164 Filed 8–29–05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–M INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation No. 731–TA–841 (Review)] Certain Non-Frozen Concentrated Apple Juice From China United States International Trade Commission. ACTION: Scheduling of an expedited fiveyear review concerning the antidumping duty order on certain non-frozen concentrated apple juice from China. AGENCY: SUMMARY: The Commission hereby gives notice of the scheduling of an expedited review pursuant to section 751(c)(3) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)(3)) (the Act) to determine whether revocation of the antidumping duty order on certain non-frozen concentrated apple juice from China would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury within a reasonably foreseeable time. For further information concerning the conduct of this review and rules of general application, consult the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure, part 201, subparts A through E (19 CFR part 201), and part 207, subparts A, D, E and F (19 CFR part 207). EFFECTIVE DATES: Effective Date: August 5, 2005. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joanna Lo (202–205–1888 or E:\FR\FM\30AUN1.SGM 30AUN1 51366 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 167 / Tuesday, August 30, 2005 / Notices joanna.lo@usitc.gov), Office of Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436. Hearingimpaired persons can obtain information on this matter by contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202– 205–1810. Persons with mobility impairments who will need special assistance in gaining access to the Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at 202–205–2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server (https:// www.usitc.gov). The public record for this review may be viewed on the Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background.—On August 5, 2005, the Commission determined that the domestic interested party group response to its notice of institution (70 FR 22694, May 2, 2005) of the subject five-year review was adequate and that the respondent interested party group response was inadequate. The Commission did not find any other circumstances that would warrant conducting a full review.1 Accordingly, the Commission determined that it would conduct an expedited review pursuant to section 751(c)(3) of the Act. Staff report.—A staff report containing information concerning the subject matter of the review will be placed in the nonpublic record on August 31, 2005, and made available to persons on the Administrative Protective Order service list for this review. A public version will be issued thereafter, pursuant to section 207.62(d)(4) of the Commission’s rules. Written submissions.—As provided in section 207.62(d) of the Commission’s rules, interested parties that are parties to the review and that have provided individually adequate responses to the notice of institution,2 and any party other than an interested party to the review, may file written comments with the Secretary on what determination the Commission should reach in the review. Comments are due on or before September 6, 2005, and may not contain new factual information. Any person that is neither a party to the five-year review nor an interested party may 1 A record of the Commissioners’ votes, the Commission’s statement on adequacy, and any individual Commissioner’s statements will be available from the Office of the Secretary and at the Commission’s web site. 2 The Commission has found the responses submitted by Naumes Concentrates, Inc. and Tree Top, Inc. to be adequate. Comments from other interested parties will not be accepted (see 19 CFR 207.62(d)(2)). VerDate Aug<18>2005 15:17 Aug 29, 2005 Jkt 205001 submit a brief written statement (which shall not contain any new factual information) pertinent to the review by September 6, 2005. However, should the Department of Commerce extend the time limit for its completion of the final results of its review, the deadline for comments (which may not contain new factual information) on Commerce’s final results is three business days after the issuance of Commerce’s results. If comments contain business proprietary information (BPI), they must conform with the requirements of sections 201.6, 207.3, and 207.7 of the Commission’s rules. The Commission’s rules do not authorize filing of submissions with the Secretary by facsimile or electronic means, except to the extent permitted by section 201.8 of the Commission’s rules, as amended, 67 FR 68036 (November 8, 2002). Even where electronic filing of a document is permitted, certain documents must also be filed in paper form, as specified in II (C) of the Commission’s Handbook on Electronic Filing Procedures, 67 FR 68168, 68173 (November 8, 2002). In accordance with sections 201.16(c) and 207.3 of the rules, each document filed by a party to the review must be served on all other parties to the review (as identified by either the public or BPI service list), and a certificate of service must be timely filed. The Secretary will not accept a document for filing without a certificate of service. Authority: This review is being conducted under authority of title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930; this notice is published pursuant to section 207.12 of the Commission’s rules. By order of the Commission. Issued: August 24, 2005. Marilyn R. Abbott, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. 05–17174 Filed 8–29–05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Antitrust Division Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993—Open Mobile Alliance Notice is hereby given that, on May 12, 2005, pursuant to section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (‘‘the Act’’), Open Mobile Alliance (‘‘OMA’’) filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in its membership. The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the PO 00000 Frm 00039 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 Act’s provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, 7 Layers AG, Ratingen, GERMANY; ACL Wireless, New Delhi, INDIA; Action Engine Corp., Redmond, WA; Adamind, Ra′anana, ISRAEL; Agere Systems Inc., Naperville, IL; Airwide Solutions Inc., Longueuil, Quebec, CANADA; Akumiitti, Helsinki, FINLAND; ALLTEL Communications, Inc., Little Rock, AR; Alterbox, Budapest, HUNGARY; Amplefuture Ltd., London, UNITED KINGDOM; Andrew Corporation, Ashburn, VA; Arasan Chip Systems Inc., San Jose, CA; AtomiZ S.A., Paris, FRANCE; Atsana Semiconductor, Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA; Auto TOOLS Group Co., Ltd., Taipei, TAIWAN; Bamboo MediaCasting, Kfar-Saba, ISRAEL; Beijing ZRRT Communications Technology Co., Ltd., Beijing, PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF CHINA; BorderWare Technologies Inc., Mississauga, Ontario, CANADA; Broadcom Corporation, Irvine, CA; Bytemobile, Inc., Mountain View, CA; Cambridge Positioning Systems Ltd., Cambridge, UNITED KINGDOM; Cellular GmbH, Hamburg, GERMANY; Celtius Oy, Helsinki, FINLAND; China Telecommunications Corporation, Beijing, PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF CHINA; China United Telecommunications Corporation, Beijing, PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF CHINA; Clickatell Ltd., Bellville, SOUTH AFRICA; ComEase Pte Ltd., Singapore, SINGAPORE; Communications Global Certification Inc., Tao-Yuan, TAIWAN; Connect Technologies Corporation, Tokyo, JAPAN; Consistec Engineering & Consulting, Saarbrucken, GERMANY; Core Mobility, Mountain View, CA; Cryptico A/S, Copenhagen, DENMARK; Danger, Inc., Palo Alto, CA; Darts Technologies Corporation, Chung Ho, TAIWAN; Dascom Technology, Beijing, PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF CHINA; Dittosoft Inc., Daegu, REPUBLIC OF KOREA; Dream Soft Co., Ltd., Daegu, REPUBLIC OF KOREA; DxO Labs, Boulogne, FRANCE; Eigel-Danielson, Monument, CO; Elcoteq Network Corporation, Salo, FINLAND; Electric Pocket, Pontyneryneydd, Torfaen, UNITED KINGDOM; Elisa, Elisa, FINLAND; EMCC Software Ltd., Manchester, UNITED KINGDOM; Emirates Telecommunications Corporation, Abu Dhabi, UNITED ARAB EMIRATES; End2End Mobile, Aalborg SV, DENMARK; ETS Dr. Genz GmbH, Reichenwalde, GERMANY; EXPWAY, Paris, FRANCE; FEELingk Co. Ltd., Seoul, REPUBLIC OF KOREA; Finjurdata, Rotkreuz, SWITZERLAND; E:\FR\FM\30AUN1.SGM 30AUN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 167 (Tuesday, August 30, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 51365-51366]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-17174]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Investigation No. 731-TA-841 (Review)]


Certain Non-Frozen Concentrated Apple Juice From China

AGENCY: United States International Trade Commission.

ACTION: Scheduling of an expedited five-year review concerning the 
antidumping duty order on certain non-frozen concentrated apple juice 
from China.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Commission hereby gives notice of the scheduling of an 
expedited review pursuant to section 751(c)(3) of the Tariff Act of 
1930 (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)(3)) (the Act) to determine whether revocation 
of the antidumping duty order on certain non-frozen concentrated apple 
juice from China would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence 
of material injury within a reasonably foreseeable time. For further 
information concerning the conduct of this review and rules of general 
application, consult the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, 
part 201, subparts A through E (19 CFR part 201), and part 207, 
subparts A, D, E and F (19 CFR part 207).

Effective Dates: Effective Date: August 5, 2005.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joanna Lo (202-205-1888 or

[[Page 51366]]

joanna.lo@usitc.gov), Office of Investigations, U.S. International 
Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436. Hearing-
impaired persons can obtain information on this matter by contacting 
the Commission's TDD terminal on 202-205-1810. Persons with mobility 
impairments who will need special assistance in gaining access to the 
Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at 202-205-2000. 
General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by 
accessing its Internet server (https://www.usitc.gov). The public record 
for this review may be viewed on the Commission's electronic docket 
(EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    Background.--On August 5, 2005, the Commission determined that the 
domestic interested party group response to its notice of institution 
(70 FR 22694, May 2, 2005) of the subject five-year review was adequate 
and that the respondent interested party group response was inadequate. 
The Commission did not find any other circumstances that would warrant 
conducting a full review.\1\ Accordingly, the Commission determined 
that it would conduct an expedited review pursuant to section 751(c)(3) 
of the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ A record of the Commissioners' votes, the Commission's 
statement on adequacy, and any individual Commissioner's statements 
will be available from the Office of the Secretary and at the 
Commission's web site.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Staff report.--A staff report containing information concerning the 
subject matter of the review will be placed in the nonpublic record on 
August 31, 2005, and made available to persons on the Administrative 
Protective Order service list for this review. A public version will be 
issued thereafter, pursuant to section 207.62(d)(4) of the Commission's 
rules.
    Written submissions.--As provided in section 207.62(d) of the 
Commission's rules, interested parties that are parties to the review 
and that have provided individually adequate responses to the notice of 
institution,\2\ and any party other than an interested party to the 
review, may file written comments with the Secretary on what 
determination the Commission should reach in the review. Comments are 
due on or before September 6, 2005, and may not contain new factual 
information. Any person that is neither a party to the five-year review 
nor an interested party may submit a brief written statement (which 
shall not contain any new factual information) pertinent to the review 
by September 6, 2005. However, should the Department of Commerce extend 
the time limit for its completion of the final results of its review, 
the deadline for comments (which may not contain new factual 
information) on Commerce's final results is three business days after 
the issuance of Commerce's results. If comments contain business 
proprietary information (BPI), they must conform with the requirements 
of sections 201.6, 207.3, and 207.7 of the Commission's rules. The 
Commission's rules do not authorize filing of submissions with the 
Secretary by facsimile or electronic means, except to the extent 
permitted by section 201.8 of the Commission's rules, as amended, 67 FR 
68036 (November 8, 2002). Even where electronic filing of a document is 
permitted, certain documents must also be filed in paper form, as 
specified in II (C) of the Commission's Handbook on Electronic Filing 
Procedures, 67 FR 68168, 68173 (November 8, 2002).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ The Commission has found the responses submitted by Naumes 
Concentrates, Inc. and Tree Top, Inc. to be adequate. Comments from 
other interested parties will not be accepted (see 19 CFR 
207.62(d)(2)).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In accordance with sections 201.16(c) and 207.3 of the rules, each 
document filed by a party to the review must be served on all other 
parties to the review (as identified by either the public or BPI 
service list), and a certificate of service must be timely filed. The 
Secretary will not accept a document for filing without a certificate 
of service.

    Authority: This review is being conducted under authority of 
title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930; this notice is published 
pursuant to section 207.12 of the Commission's rules.

    By order of the Commission.

    Issued: August 24, 2005.

Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 05-17174 Filed 8-29-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.