Notice of Initiation and Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Changed Circumstances Review: Certain Softwood Lumber Products from Canada, 50299-50301 [E5-4702]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 165 / Friday, August 26, 2005 / Notices NSN: 8410–01–414–6979—4 Regular NSN: 8410–01–414–6980—6 Regular NSN: 8410–01–414–6981—8 Regular NSN: 8410–01–414–7023—10 Regular NSN: 8410–01–414–7105—12 Regular NSN: 8410–01–414–7113—14 Regular NSN: 8410–01–414–7116—16 Regular NSN: 8410–01–414–7118—18 Regular NSN: 8410–01–414–7120—20 Regular NSN: 8410–01–414–7186—22 Regular NSN: 8410–01–414–7232—24 Regular NSN: 8410–01–414–7233—26 Regular NPA: Middle Georgia Diversified Industries, Inc., Dublin, Georgia. Contracting Activity: Defense Supply Center Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Deletion Regulatory Flexibility Act Certification I certify that the following action will not have a significant impact on a substantial number of small entities. The major factors considered for this certification were: 1. If approved, the action may result in additional reporting, recordkeeping or other compliance requirements for small entities. 2. If approved, the action may result in authorizing small entities to furnish the product to the government. 3. There are no known regulatory alternatives which would accomplish the objectives of the Javits-WagnerO’Day Act (41 U.S.C. 46–48c) in connection with the product proposed for deletion from the Procurement List. End of Certification The following product is proposed for deletion from the Procurement List: Product Pencil, Mechanical NSN: 7520–00–724–5606—Pencil, Mechanical NPA: San Antonio Lighthouse, San Antonio, Texas. Contracting Activity: Office Supplies & Paper Products Acquisition Center, New York, New York. Sheryl D. Kennerly, Director, Information Management. [FR Doc. E5–4675 Filed 8–25–05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6353–01–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–122–838] Notice of Initiation and Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Changed Circumstances Review: Certain Softwood Lumber Products from Canada Import Administration, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. AGENCY: VerDate jul<14>2003 16:18 Aug 25, 2005 Jkt 205001 SUMMARY: In response to a request from Produits Forestiers Arbec Inc. (Arbec), the Department of Commerce is initiating a changed circumstances review of the antidumping duty order on certain softwood lumber products from Canada and preliminarily finds that Arbec is the successor–in-interest to ˆ ˆ Uniforet Inc. (Uniforet). EFFECTIVE DATE: August 26, 2005. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Constance Handley or Saliha Loucif, AD/CVD Operations, Office 1, Import Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–0631or (202) 482– 1779, respectively. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background: On May 22, 2002, the Department of Commerce (Department) issued the antidumping duty order on Certain Softwood Lumber Products from Canada. See Notice of Amended Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value and Antidumping Duty Order: Certain Softwood Lumber Products From Canada, 67 FR 36067 (May 22, 2002). On June 29, 2005, Arbec requested that the Department initiate a changed circumstances review, in accordance with section 351.216 of the Department’s regulations, to confirm that Arbec is the successor–in-interest to ˆ Uniforet. In its request, Arbec stated that it changed its name to Arbec from ˆ Uniforet on May 9, 2005, and provided supporting documentation. Scope of the Order The products covered by this order are softwood lumber, flooring and siding (softwood lumber products). Softwood lumber products include all products classified under headings 4407.1000, 4409.1010, 4409.1090, and 4409.1020, respectively, of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS), and any softwood lumber, flooring and siding described below. These softwood lumber products include: (1) coniferous wood, sawn or chipped lengthwise, sliced or peeled, whether or not planed, sanded or finger–jointed, of a thickness exceeding six millimeters; (2) coniferous wood siding (including strips and friezes for parquet flooring, not assembled) continuously shaped (tongued, grooved, rabbeted, chamfered, v– jointed, beaded, molded, rounded or the like) along any of its edges or faces, whether or not planed, PO 00000 Frm 00009 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 50299 sanded or finger–jointed; (3) other coniferous wood (including strips and friezes for parquet flooring, not assembled) continuously shaped (tongued, grooved, rabbeted, chamfered, v– jointed, beaded, molded, rounded or the like) along any of its edges or faces (other than wood moldings and wood dowel rods) whether or not planed, sanded or finger– jointed; and (4) coniferous wood flooring (including strips and friezes for parquet flooring, not assembled) continuously shaped (tongued, grooved, rabbeted, chamfered, v– jointed, beaded, molded, rounded or the like) along any of its edges or faces, whether or not planed, sanded or finger–jointed. Although the HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes, the written description of the merchandise under investigation is dispositive. Preliminary scope exclusions and clarifications were published in three separate Federal Register notices. Softwood lumber products excluded from the scope: • trusses and truss kits, properly classified under HTSUS 4418.90 • I–joist beams • assembled box spring frames • pallets and pallet kits, properly classified under HTSUS 4415.20 • garage doors • edge–glued wood, properly classified under HTSUS 4421.90.97.40 (formerly HTSUS 4421.90.98.40) • properly classified complete door frames • properly classified complete window frames • properly classified furniture Softwood lumber products excluded from the scope only if they meet certain requirements: • Stringers (pallet components used for runners): if they have at least two notches on the side, positioned at equal distance from the center, to properly accommodate forklift blades, properly classified under HTSUS 4421.90.97.40 (formerly HTSUS 4421.90.98.40). • Box–spring frame kits: if they contain the following wooden pieces - two side rails, two end (or top) rails and varying numbers of slats. The side rails and the end rails should be radius–cut at both ends. The kits should be individually packaged, they should contain the exact number of wooden components needed to make a particular box spring frame, E:\FR\FM\26AUN1.SGM 26AUN1 50300 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 165 / Friday, August 26, 2005 / Notices with no further processing required. None of the components exceeds 1’’ in actual thickness or 83’’ in length. • Radius–cut box–spring-frame components, not exceeding 1’’ in actual thickness or 83’’ in length, ready for assembly without further processing. The radius cuts must be present on both ends of the boards and must be substantial cuts so as to completely round one corner. • Fence pickets requiring no further processing and properly classified under HTSUS 4421.90.70, 1’’ or less in actual thickness, up to 8’’ wide, 6’ or less in length, and have finials or decorative cuttings that clearly identify them as fence pickets. In the case of dog–eared fence pickets, the corners of the boards should be cut off so as to remove pieces of wood in the shape of isosceles right angle triangles with sides measuring 3/4 inch or more. • U.S. origin lumber shipped to Canada for minor processing and imported into the United States, is excluded from the scope of this order if the following conditions are met: 1) the processing occurring in Canada is limited to kiln–drying, planing to create smooth–to-size board, and sanding, and 2) the importer establishes to U.S. Customs and Border Protection’s (CBP) satisfaction that the lumber is of U.S. origin.1 • Softwood lumber products contained in single family home packages or kits,2 regardless of tariff classification, are excluded from the scope of the orders if the following criteria are met: 1. The imported home package or kit constitutes a full package of the number of wooden pieces specified in the plan, design or blueprint necessary to produce a home of at least 700 square feet produced to a specified plan, design or blueprint; 2. The package or kit must contain all necessary internal and external doors and windows, nails, screws, glue, subfloor, sheathing, beams, posts, connectors and, if included in purchase contract, decking, trim, drywall and roof shingles specified in the plan, design or blueprint; 3. Prior to importation, the package or kit must be sold to a retailer of 1 For further clarification pertaining to this exclusion, see the additional language concluding the scope description below. 2 To ensure administrability, we clarified the language of this exclusion to require an importer certification and to permit single or multiple entries on multiple days, as well as instructing importers to retain and make available for inspection specific documentation in support of each entry. VerDate jul<14>2003 16:18 Aug 25, 2005 Jkt 205001 complete home packages or kits pursuant to a valid purchase contract referencing the particular home design plan or blueprint, and signed by a customer not affiliated with the importer; 4. The whole package must be imported under a single consolidated entry when permitted by CBP, whether or not on a single or multiple trucks, rail cars or other vehicles, which shall be on the same day except when the home is over 2,000 square feet; 5. The following documentation must be included with the entry documents: • a copy of the appropriate home design, plan, or blueprint matching the entry; • a purchase contract from a retailer of home kits or packages signed by a customer not affiliated with the importer; • a listing of inventory of all parts of the package or kit being entered that conforms to the home design package being entered; • in the case of multiple shipments on the same contract, all items listed immediately above which are included in the present shipment shall be identified as well. We have determined that the excluded products listed above are outside the scope of this order provided the specified conditions are met. Lumber products that CBP may classify as stringers, radius cut box–spring-frame components, and fence pickets, not conforming to the above requirements, as well as truss components, pallet components, and door and window frame parts, are covered under the scope of this order and may be classified under HTSUS subheadings 4418.90.40.90, 4421.90.70.40, and 4421.90.98.40. Due to changes in the 2002 HTSUS whereby subheading 4418.90.40.90 and 4421.90.98.40 were changed to 4418.90.45.90 and 4421.90.97.40, respectively, we are adding these subheadings as well. In addition, this scope language has been further clarified to now specify that all softwood lumber products entered from Canada claiming non– subject status based on U.S. country of origin will be treated as non–subject U.S.-origin merchandise under the antidumping and countervailing duty orders, provided that these softwood lumber products meet the following condition: upon entry, the importer, exporter, Canadian processor and/or original U.S. producer establish to CBP’s satisfaction that the softwood lumber entered and documented as U.S.-origin softwood lumber was first produced in PO 00000 Frm 00010 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 the United States as a lumber product satisfying the physical parameters of the softwood lumber scope.3 The presumption of non–subject status can, however, be rebutted by evidence demonstrating that the merchandise was substantially transformed in Canada. Initiation and Preliminary Results Pursuant to section 751(b)(1) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), the Department will conduct a changed circumstances review upon receipt of information concerning, or a request from an interested party for a review of, an antidumping duty order which shows changed circumstances sufficient to warrant a review of the order. As indicated in the Background section, we have received information indicating ˆ that Uniforet has changed its name to Arbec. This constitutes changed circumstances warranting a review of the order. Therefore, in accordance with section 751(b)(1) of the Act, we are initiating a changed circumstances review based upon the information contained in Arbec’s submissions. Section 351.221(c)(3)(ii) of the regulations permits the Department to combine the notice of initiation of a changed circumstances review and the notice of preliminary results if the Department concludes that expedited action is warranted. In this instance, because we have on the record the information necessary to make a preliminary finding, we find that expedited action is warranted and have combined the notice of initiation and the notice of preliminary results. In making successor–in-interest determinations, the Department examines several factors including, but not limited to, changes in: (1) management; (2) production facilities; (3) supplier relationships; and (4) customer base. See, e.g., Polychloroprene Rubber from Japan: Final Results of Changed Circumstances Review, 67 FR 58 (January 2, 2002) citing, Brass Sheet and Strip from Canada: Notice of Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 57 FR 20460 (May 13, 1992). While no single factor, or combination of factors, will necessarily prove dispositive, the Department will generally consider the new company to be the successor to its predecessor company if the resulting operations are essentially the same as the predecessor company. Id. citing, Industrial Phosphoric Acid from Israel; Final 3 See the scope clarification message (3034202), dated February 3, 2003, to CBP, regarding treatment of U.S.-origin lumber on file in the Central Records Unit, Room B-099 of the main Commerce building. E:\FR\FM\26AUN1.SGM 26AUN1 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 165 / Friday, August 26, 2005 / Notices Results of Changed Circumstances Review, 59 FR 6944, 6945 (February 14, 1994). Thus, if the evidence demonstrates that, with respect to the production and sale of the subject merchandise, the new company operates as the same business entity as its predecessor, the Department will assign the new company the cash– deposit rate of its predecessor. In its June 29, 2005, submission, Arbec argues that it merely changed its ˆ name to Arbec from Uniforet, and that Arbec is the identical company to ˆ Uniforet. As such, Arbec states that the company’s management, production facilities, and supplier/customer relationships have not changed. To support its claims, Arbec submitted numerous documents, including: (1) copies of Certificate of Amendment documents amending the name of ˆ Uniforet to Arbec; (2) a copy of a resolution of the Annual and Special ˆ Meeting of Shareholders of Uniforet ˆ adopting the modification of Uniforet’s corporate name; (3) a letter from Arbec to the Department, dated May 25, 2005, requesting the recognition of a name change; and (4) a pre–name change advertising flyer announcing the new Arbec logo. Further, Arbec provided information such as a chart of its shareholders, a list of its production facilities, and details on its supplier management agreements, confirming that its ownership, management, production facilities, supply sources and customer base are unchanged from ˆ those of its predecessor, Uniforet. Based on the information submitted by Arbec, we preliminarily find that Arbec is the successor–in-interest to ˆ Uniforet. Based on the evidence reviewed, we find that Arbec operates as ˆ the same business entity as Uniforet and that the company’s senior management, production facilities, supplier relationships, and customers have not changed. Thus, we preliminarily find that Arbec should receive the same antidumping duty cash–deposit rate (i.e., 11.54 percent) with respect to the ˆ subject merchandise as Uniforet, its predecessor company. This rate reflects the ‘‘all others’’ rate from the investigation as modified in the Notice of Determination Under Section 129 of the Uruguay Round Agreements Act: Antidumping Measures on Certain Softwood Lumber Products From Canada, 70 FR 22636 (May 2, 2005). As a result, if these preliminary results are adopted in our final results of this changed circumstances review, we will instruct U.S. Customs and Border Protection to continue to suspend shipments of subject merchandise made by Arbec at VerDate jul<14>2003 16:18 Aug 25, 2005 Jkt 205001 ˆ Uniforet’s cash deposit rate (i.e., 11.54 percent ‘‘all others’’ rate). This deposit rate shall remain in effect until publication of the final results of the second administrative review of the order, which covers the period May 1, 2003, through April 30, 2004, in which ˆ Uniforet is a respondent. See Notice of Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Partial Rescission: Certain Softwood Lumber Products From Canada, 70 FR 33063, June 7, 2005. Public Comment Any interested party may request a hearing within 30 days of publication of this notice. See 19 CFR 351.310(c). Any hearing, if requested, will be held 44 days after the date of publication of this notice, or the first working day thereafter. Interested parties may submit case briefs and/or written comments not later than 30 days after the date of publication of this notice. Rebuttal briefs and rebuttals to written comments, which must be limited to issues raised in such briefs or comments, may be filed not later than 37 days after the date of publication of this notice. Parties who submit arguments are requested to submit with the argument: (1) a statement of the issue; (2) a brief summary of the argument; and (3) a table of authorities. Consistent with section 351.216(e) of the Department’s regulations, we will issue the final results of this changed circumstances review no later than 270 days after the date on which this review was initiated, or within 45 days if all parties agree to our preliminary finding. We are issuing and publishing this finding and notice in accordance with sections 751(b)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and section 351.216 of the Department’s regulations. Dated: August 22, 2005. Ronald K. Lorentzen, Acting Assistant Secretary for Import Administration. [FR Doc. E5–4702 Filed 8–25–05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–583–816] Certain Stainless Steel Butt–Weld Pipe Fittings from Taiwan: Notice of Amended Final Results Pursuant to Final Court Decision Import Administration, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. AGENCY: PO 00000 Frm 00011 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 50301 On June 14, 2005, in Alloy Piping Products, Inc., Flowline Division, et al. v. United States, Slip Op. 05–69, (‘‘Alloy Piping II’’), the Court of International Trade (‘‘CIT’’) affirmed the Department of Commerce’s (the ‘‘Department’’) Final Results of Determination Pursuant to Remand (‘‘Remand Results’’), dated February 14, 2005, and entered a judgment order. This litigation related to the Department’s review of the antidumping order on certain stainless steel butt– weld pipe fittings from Taiwan, covering the period June 1, 1999, through May 31, 2000. See Certain Stainless Steel Butt–Weld Pipe Fittings Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 66 FR 65899, 65900, (December 21, 2001) (‘‘Final Results’’). As no further appeals have been filed and there is now a final and conclusive court decision in this action, we are amending the final results of review in this proceeding and we will instruct U.S. Customs and Border Protection (‘‘CBP’’) to liquidate entries subject to this review. EFFECTIVE DATE: August 26, 2005. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Alex Villanueva, AD/CVD Operations, Office 9, Import Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230, telephone 202–482–3208, fax 202–482– 9089. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: SUMMARY: Background Following publication of the Final Results, Alloy Piping Products, Inc., Flowline Division, Markovitz Enterprises, Inc., Gerlin Inc., and Taylor Forge Stainless Inc., (the ‘‘Petitioners’’) and Ta Chen, filed a lawsuit with the CIT challenging the Department’s findings. In Alloy Piping v. United States, Slip Op. 04–134, (CIT 2004) (‘‘Alloy Piping I’’), the CIT instructed the Department to (1) reopen the record, seek additional relevant information regarding employee bonuses, and recalculate the general and administrative (‘‘G&A’’) expenses of Ta Chen; and (2) reconsider Ta Chen’s U.S. indirect selling expenses and to account for all of Ta Chen’s U.S. selling expenses incurred during fiscal year 1999. The Department complied with the CIT’s remand instructions and issued its final results of redetermination pursuant to remand on February 14, 2005. See Final Results of Redetermination Pursuant to Remand (‘‘Remand Results’’). In the Remand Results, the Department reopened the record, sought E:\FR\FM\26AUN1.SGM 26AUN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 165 (Friday, August 26, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 50299-50301]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E5-4702]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-122-838]


Notice of Initiation and Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty 
Changed Circumstances Review: Certain Softwood Lumber Products from 
Canada

AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: In response to a request from Produits Forestiers Arbec Inc. 
(Arbec), the Department of Commerce is initiating a changed 
circumstances review of the antidumping duty order on certain softwood 
lumber products from Canada and preliminarily finds that Arbec is the 
successor-in-interest to Unifor[ecirc]t Inc. (Unifor[ecirc]t).

EFFECTIVE DATE: August 26, 2005.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Constance Handley or Saliha Loucif, 
AD/CVD Operations, Office 1, Import Administration, International Trade 
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and 
Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-
0631or (202) 482-1779, respectively.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background:

    On May 22, 2002, the Department of Commerce (Department) issued the 
antidumping duty order on Certain Softwood Lumber Products from Canada. 
See Notice of Amended Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair 
Value and Antidumping Duty Order: Certain Softwood Lumber Products From 
Canada, 67 FR 36067 (May 22, 2002). On June 29, 2005, Arbec requested 
that the Department initiate a changed circumstances review, in 
accordance with section 351.216 of the Department's regulations, to 
confirm that Arbec is the successor-in-interest to Unifor[ecirc]t. In 
its request, Arbec stated that it changed its name to Arbec from 
Unifor[ecirc]t on May 9, 2005, and provided supporting documentation.

Scope of the Order

    The products covered by this order are softwood lumber, flooring 
and siding (softwood lumber products). Softwood lumber products include 
all products classified under headings 4407.1000, 4409.1010, 4409.1090, 
and 4409.1020, respectively, of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the 
United States (HTSUS), and any softwood lumber, flooring and siding 
described below. These softwood lumber products include:
    (1) coniferous wood, sawn or chipped lengthwise, sliced or peeled, 
whether or not planed, sanded or finger-jointed, of a thickness 
exceeding six millimeters;
    (2) coniferous wood siding (including strips and friezes for 
parquet flooring, not assembled) continuously shaped (tongued, grooved, 
rabbeted, chamfered, v-jointed, beaded, molded, rounded or the like) 
along any of its edges or faces, whether or not planed, sanded or 
finger-jointed;
    (3) other coniferous wood (including strips and friezes for parquet 
flooring, not assembled) continuously shaped (tongued, grooved, 
rabbeted, chamfered, v-jointed, beaded, molded, rounded or the like) 
along any of its edges or faces (other than wood moldings and wood 
dowel rods) whether or not planed, sanded or finger-jointed; and
    (4) coniferous wood flooring (including strips and friezes for 
parquet flooring, not assembled) continuously shaped (tongued, grooved, 
rabbeted, chamfered, v-jointed, beaded, molded, rounded or the like) 
along any of its edges or faces, whether or not planed, sanded or 
finger-jointed.
    Although the HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and 
customs purposes, the written description of the merchandise under 
investigation is dispositive. Preliminary scope exclusions and 
clarifications were published in three separate Federal Register 
notices.
    Softwood lumber products excluded from the scope:
     trusses and truss kits, properly classified under HTSUS 
4418.90
     I-joist beams
     assembled box spring frames
     pallets and pallet kits, properly classified under HTSUS 
4415.20
     garage doors
     edge-glued wood, properly classified under HTSUS 
4421.90.97.40 (formerly HTSUS 4421.90.98.40)
     properly classified complete door frames
     properly classified complete window frames
     properly classified furniture
    Softwood lumber products excluded from the scope only if they meet 
certain requirements:
     Stringers (pallet components used for runners): if they 
have at least two notches on the side, positioned at equal distance 
from the center, to properly accommodate forklift blades, properly 
classified under HTSUS 4421.90.97.40 (formerly HTSUS 4421.90.98.40).
     Box-spring frame kits: if they contain the following 
wooden pieces - two side rails, two end (or top) rails and varying 
numbers of slats. The side rails and the end rails should be radius-cut 
at both ends. The kits should be individually packaged, they should 
contain the exact number of wooden components needed to make a 
particular box spring frame,

[[Page 50300]]

with no further processing required. None of the components exceeds 1'' 
in actual thickness or 83'' in length.
     Radius-cut box-spring-frame components, not exceeding 1'' 
in actual thickness or 83'' in length, ready for assembly without 
further processing. The radius cuts must be present on both ends of the 
boards and must be substantial cuts so as to completely round one 
corner.
     Fence pickets requiring no further processing and properly 
classified under HTSUS 4421.90.70, 1'' or less in actual thickness, up 
to 8'' wide, 6' or less in length, and have finials or decorative 
cuttings that clearly identify them as fence pickets. In the case of 
dog-eared fence pickets, the corners of the boards should be cut off so 
as to remove pieces of wood in the shape of isosceles right angle 
triangles with sides measuring 3/4 inch or more.
     U.S. origin lumber shipped to Canada for minor processing 
and imported into the United States, is excluded from the scope of this 
order if the following conditions are met: 1) the processing occurring 
in Canada is limited to kiln-drying, planing to create smooth-to-size 
board, and sanding, and 2) the importer establishes to U.S. Customs and 
Border Protection's (CBP) satisfaction that the lumber is of U.S. 
origin.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ For further clarification pertaining to this exclusion, see 
the additional language concluding the scope description below.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

     Softwood lumber products contained in single family home 
packages or kits,\2\ regardless of tariff classification, are excluded 
from the scope of the orders if the following criteria are met:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ To ensure administrability, we clarified the language of 
this exclusion to require an importer certification and to permit 
single or multiple entries on multiple days, as well as instructing 
importers to retain and make available for inspection specific 
documentation in support of each entry.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    1. The imported home package or kit constitutes a full package of 
the number of wooden pieces specified in the plan, design or blueprint 
necessary to produce a home of at least 700 square feet produced to a 
specified plan, design or blueprint;
    2. The package or kit must contain all necessary internal and 
external doors and windows, nails, screws, glue, subfloor, sheathing, 
beams, posts, connectors and, if included in purchase contract, 
decking, trim, drywall and roof shingles specified in the plan, design 
or blueprint;
    3. Prior to importation, the package or kit must be sold to a 
retailer of complete home packages or kits pursuant to a valid purchase 
contract referencing the particular home design plan or blueprint, and 
signed by a customer not affiliated with the importer;
    4. The whole package must be imported under a single consolidated 
entry when permitted by CBP, whether or not on a single or multiple 
trucks, rail cars or other vehicles, which shall be on the same day 
except when the home is over 2,000 square feet;
    5. The following documentation must be included with the entry 
documents:
     a copy of the appropriate home design, plan, or blueprint 
matching the entry;
     a purchase contract from a retailer of home kits or 
packages signed by a customer not affiliated with the importer;
     a listing of inventory of all parts of the package or kit 
being entered that conforms to the home design package being entered;
     in the case of multiple shipments on the same contract, 
all items listed immediately above which are included in the present 
shipment shall be identified as well.
    We have determined that the excluded products listed above are 
outside the scope of this order provided the specified conditions are 
met. Lumber products that CBP may classify as stringers, radius cut 
box-spring-frame components, and fence pickets, not conforming to the 
above requirements, as well as truss components, pallet components, and 
door and window frame parts, are covered under the scope of this order 
and may be classified under HTSUS subheadings 4418.90.40.90, 
4421.90.70.40, and 4421.90.98.40. Due to changes in the 2002 HTSUS 
whereby subheading 4418.90.40.90 and 4421.90.98.40 were changed to 
4418.90.45.90 and 4421.90.97.40, respectively, we are adding these 
subheadings as well.
    In addition, this scope language has been further clarified to now 
specify that all softwood lumber products entered from Canada claiming 
non-subject status based on U.S. country of origin will be treated as 
non-subject U.S.-origin merchandise under the antidumping and 
countervailing duty orders, provided that these softwood lumber 
products meet the following condition: upon entry, the importer, 
exporter, Canadian processor and/or original U.S. producer establish to 
CBP's satisfaction that the softwood lumber entered and documented as 
U.S.-origin softwood lumber was first produced in the United States as 
a lumber product satisfying the physical parameters of the softwood 
lumber scope.\3\ The presumption of non-subject status can, however, be 
rebutted by evidence demonstrating that the merchandise was 
substantially transformed in Canada.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ See the scope clarification message (3034202), dated 
February 3, 2003, to CBP, regarding treatment of U.S.-origin lumber 
on file in the Central Records Unit, Room B-099 of the main Commerce 
building.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Initiation and Preliminary Results

    Pursuant to section 751(b)(1) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended 
(the Act), the Department will conduct a changed circumstances review 
upon receipt of information concerning, or a request from an interested 
party for a review of, an antidumping duty order which shows changed 
circumstances sufficient to warrant a review of the order. As indicated 
in the Background section, we have received information indicating that 
Unifor[ecirc]t has changed its name to Arbec. This constitutes changed 
circumstances warranting a review of the order. Therefore, in 
accordance with section 751(b)(1) of the Act, we are initiating a 
changed circumstances review based upon the information contained in 
Arbec's submissions.
    Section 351.221(c)(3)(ii) of the regulations permits the Department 
to combine the notice of initiation of a changed circumstances review 
and the notice of preliminary results if the Department concludes that 
expedited action is warranted. In this instance, because we have on the 
record the information necessary to make a preliminary finding, we find 
that expedited action is warranted and have combined the notice of 
initiation and the notice of preliminary results.
    In making successor-in-interest determinations, the Department 
examines several factors including, but not limited to, changes in: (1) 
management; (2) production facilities; (3) supplier relationships; and 
(4) customer base. See, e.g., Polychloroprene Rubber from Japan: Final 
Results of Changed Circumstances Review, 67 FR 58 (January 2, 2002) 
citing, Brass Sheet and Strip from Canada: Notice of Final Results of 
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 57 FR 20460 (May 13, 1992). 
While no single factor, or combination of factors, will necessarily 
prove dispositive, the Department will generally consider the new 
company to be the successor to its predecessor company if the resulting 
operations are essentially the same as the predecessor company. Id. 
citing, Industrial Phosphoric Acid from Israel; Final

[[Page 50301]]

Results of Changed Circumstances Review, 59 FR 6944, 6945 (February 14, 
1994). Thus, if the evidence demonstrates that, with respect to the 
production and sale of the subject merchandise, the new company 
operates as the same business entity as its predecessor, the Department 
will assign the new company the cash-deposit rate of its predecessor.
    In its June 29, 2005, submission, Arbec argues that it merely 
changed its name to Arbec from Unifor[ecirc]t, and that Arbec is the 
identical company to Unifor[ecirc]t. As such, Arbec states that the 
company's management, production facilities, and supplier/customer 
relationships have not changed. To support its claims, Arbec submitted 
numerous documents, including: (1) copies of Certificate of Amendment 
documents amending the name of Unifor[ecirc]t to Arbec; (2) a copy of a 
resolution of the Annual and Special Meeting of Shareholders of 
Unifor[ecirc]t adopting the modification of Unifor[ecirc]t's corporate 
name; (3) a letter from Arbec to the Department, dated May 25, 2005, 
requesting the recognition of a name change; and (4) a pre-name change 
advertising flyer announcing the new Arbec logo. Further, Arbec 
provided information such as a chart of its shareholders, a list of its 
production facilities, and details on its supplier management 
agreements, confirming that its ownership, management, production 
facilities, supply sources and customer base are unchanged from those 
of its predecessor, Unifor[ecirc]t.
    Based on the information submitted by Arbec, we preliminarily find 
that Arbec is the successor-in-interest to Unifor[ecirc]t. Based on the 
evidence reviewed, we find that Arbec operates as the same business 
entity as Unifor[ecirc]t and that the company's senior management, 
production facilities, supplier relationships, and customers have not 
changed. Thus, we preliminarily find that Arbec should receive the same 
antidumping duty cash-deposit rate (i.e., 11.54 percent) with respect 
to the subject merchandise as Unifor[ecirc]t, its predecessor company. 
This rate reflects the ``all others'' rate from the investigation as 
modified in the Notice of Determination Under Section 129 of the 
Uruguay Round Agreements Act: Antidumping Measures on Certain Softwood 
Lumber Products From Canada, 70 FR 22636 (May 2, 2005).
     As a result, if these preliminary results are adopted in our final 
results of this changed circumstances review, we will instruct U.S. 
Customs and Border Protection to continue to suspend shipments of 
subject merchandise made by Arbec at Unifor[ecirc]t's cash deposit rate 
(i.e., 11.54 percent ``all others'' rate). This deposit rate shall 
remain in effect until publication of the final results of the second 
administrative review of the order, which covers the period May 1, 
2003, through April 30, 2004, in which Unifor[ecirc]t is a respondent. 
See Notice of Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative 
Review and Partial Rescission: Certain Softwood Lumber Products From 
Canada, 70 FR 33063, June 7, 2005.

Public Comment

    Any interested party may request a hearing within 30 days of 
publication of this notice. See 19 CFR 351.310(c). Any hearing, if 
requested, will be held 44 days after the date of publication of this 
notice, or the first working day thereafter. Interested parties may 
submit case briefs and/or written comments not later than 30 days after 
the date of publication of this notice. Rebuttal briefs and rebuttals 
to written comments, which must be limited to issues raised in such 
briefs or comments, may be filed not later than 37 days after the date 
of publication of this notice. Parties who submit arguments are 
requested to submit with the argument: (1) a statement of the issue; 
(2) a brief summary of the argument; and (3) a table of authorities.
    Consistent with section 351.216(e) of the Department's regulations, 
we will issue the final results of this changed circumstances review no 
later than 270 days after the date on which this review was initiated, 
or within 45 days if all parties agree to our preliminary finding. We 
are issuing and publishing this finding and notice in accordance with 
sections 751(b)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and section 351.216 of the 
Department's regulations.

    Dated: August 22, 2005.
Ronald K. Lorentzen,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Import Administration.
[FR Doc. E5-4702 Filed 8-25-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-S
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.