State Charter School Facilities Incentive Program, 50257-50261 [05-17049]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 165 / Friday, August 26, 2005 / Proposed Rules
promulgated by a specific State, not by
OSM. Under sections 503 and 505 of
SMCRA (30 U.S.C. 1253 and 1255) and
the Federal regulations at 30 CFR
730.11, 732.15, and 732.17(h)(10),
decisions on proposed State regulatory
programs and program amendments
submitted by the States must be based
solely on a determination of whether the
submittal is consistent with SMCRA and
its implementing Federal regulations
and whether the other requirements of
30 CFR parts 730, 731, and 732 have
been met.
Executive Order 13132—Federalism
This rule does not have federalism
implications. SMCRA delineates the
roles of the Federal and State
Governments with regard to the
regulation of surface coal mining and
reclamation operations. One of the
purposes of SMCRA is to ‘‘establish a
nationwide program to protect society
and the environment from the adverse
effects of surface coal mining
operations.’’ Section 503(a)(1) of
SMCRA requires that State laws
regulating surface coal mining and
reclamation operations be ‘‘in
accordance with’’ the requirements of
SMCRA, and section 503(a)(7) requires
that State programs contain rules and
regulations ‘‘consistent with’’
regulations issued by the Secretary
pursuant to SMCRA.
Executive Order 13175—Consultation
and Coordination With Indian Tribal
Governments
In accordance with Executive Order
13175, we have evaluated the potential
effects of this rule on Federallyrecognized Indian tribes and have
determined that the rule does not have
substantial direct effects on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship
between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes.
The basis for this determination is that
our decision is on a State regulatory
program and does not involve a Federal
regulation involving Indian lands.
Executive Order 13211—Regulations
That Significantly Affect the Supply,
Distribution, or Use of Energy
On May 18, 2001, the President issued
Executive Order 13211 which requires
agencies to prepare a Statement of
Energy Effects for a rule that is (1)
considered significant under Executive
Order 12866, and (2) likely to have a
significant adverse effect on the supply,
distribution, or use of energy. Because
this rule is exempt from review under
Executive Order 12866 and is not
VerDate jul<14>2003
16:35 Aug 25, 2005
Jkt 205001
expected to have a significant adverse
effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy, a Statement of Energy Effects
is not required.
National Environmental Policy Act
This rule does not require an
environmental impact statement
because section 702(d) of SMCRA (30
U.S.C. 1292(d)) provides that agency
decisions on proposed State regulatory
program provisions do not constitute
major Federal actions within the
meaning of section 102(2)(C) of the
National Environmental Policy Act (42
U.S.C. 4332(2)(C)).
Paperwork Reduction Act
This rule does not contain
information collection requirements that
require approval by OMB under the
Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C.
3507 et seq.).
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Department of the Interior
certifies that this rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.). The State submittal,
which is the subject of this rule, is based
upon counterpart Federal regulations for
which an economic analysis was
prepared and certification made that
such regulations would not have a
significant economic effect upon a
substantial number of small entities. In
making the determination as to whether
this rule would have a significant
economic impact, the Department relied
upon the data and assumptions for the
counterpart Federal regulations.
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act
This rule is not a major rule under 5
U.S.C. 804(2), the Small Business
Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act.
This rule: (a) Does not have an annual
effect on the economy of $100 million;
(b) Will not cause a major increase in
costs or prices for consumers,
individual industries, Federal, State, or
local government agencies, or
geographic regions; and (c) Does not
have significant adverse effects on
competition, employment, investment,
productivity, innovation, or the ability
of U.S.-based enterprises to compete
with foreign-based enterprises. This
determination is based upon the
analysis performed under various laws
and executive orders for the counterpart
Federal regulations.
Unfunded Mandates
This rule will not impose an
unfunded mandate on State, local, or
PO 00000
Frm 00036
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
50257
tribal governments or the private sector
of $100 million or more in any given
year. This determination is based upon
the analysis performed under various
laws and executive orders for the
counterpart Federal regulations.
List of Subjects in 30 CFR Part 948
Intergovernmental relations, Surface
mining, Underground mining.
Dated: July 29, 2005
Brent Wahlquist,
Regional Director, Appalachian Region.
[FR Doc. 05–17002 Filed 8–25–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–05–P
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
34 CFR Part 226
State Charter School Facilities
Incentive Program
Office of Innovation and
Improvement, Department of Education.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The Secretary issues these
proposed regulations to administer the
State Charter School Facilities Incentive
program. Under this program, the
Department of Education
(‘‘Department’’) provides competitive
grants to States to help charter schools
meet their need for facilities.
DATES: We must receive your comments
on or before September 26, 2005.
ADDRESSES: Address all comments about
these proposed regulations to Jim
Houser, U.S. Department of Education,
400 Maryland Avenue, SW., room
4W245, Washington, DC 20202–6140. If
you prefer to send your comments
through the Internet, you may address
them to us at the U.S. Government Web
site: https://www.regulations.gov; or you
may send your Internet comments to us
at the following address:
comments@ed.gov.
You must include the term ‘‘state
incentive’’ in the subject line of your
electronic message.
If you want to comment on the
information collection requirements,
you must send your comments to the
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) at the address listed in the
Paperwork Reduction Act section of this
preamble. You may also send a copy of
these comments to the Department
representative named in this section.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ann
Margaret Galiatsos or Jim Houser, U.S.
Department of Education, 400 Maryland
Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20202–
6140. Telephone: (202) 205–9765 or via
Internet: charter.facilities@ed.gov.
E:\FR\FM\26AUP1.SGM
26AUP1
50258
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 165 / Friday, August 26, 2005 / Proposed Rules
If you use a telecommunications
device for the deaf (TDD), you may call
the Federal Relay Service (FRS) at 1–
800–877–8339.
Individuals with disabilities may
obtain this document in an alternative
format (e.g., Braille, large print,
audiotape, or computer diskette) on
request to the contact person listed
under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Invitation To Comment
We invite you to submit comments
regarding these proposed regulations.
To ensure that your comments have
maximum effect in developing the final
regulations, we urge you to identify
clearly the specific section or sections of
the proposed regulations that each of
your comments addresses and to arrange
your comments in the same order as the
proposed regulations.
We also invite you to assist us in
complying with the specific
requirements of Executive Order 12866
and its overall requirement of reducing
regulatory burden that might result from
these proposed regulations. Please let us
know of any further opportunities we
should take to reduce potential costs or
increase potential benefits while
preserving the effective and efficient
administration of the program.
During and after the comment period,
you may inspect all public comments
about these proposed regulations in
room 4W259, 400 Maryland Avenue,
SW., Washington, DC, between the
hours of 8:30 a.m. and 4 p.m., Eastern
time, Monday through Friday of each
week except Federal holidays.
Assistance to Individuals With
Disabilities in Reviewing the
Rulemaking Record
On request, we will supply an
appropriate aid, such as a reader or
print magnifier, to an individual with a
disability who needs assistance to
review the comments or other
documents in the public rulemaking
record for these proposed regulations. If
you want to schedule an appointment
for this type of aid, please contact the
person listed under FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT.
Background
These proposed regulations would
apply to the State Charter School
Facilities Incentive program, which is
authorized under title V, part B, subpart
1 of the Elementary and Secondary
Education Act of 1965, as amended by
the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001
(Pub. L. 107–110, enacted January 8,
2002) (Act). The purpose of this
VerDate jul<14>2003
16:35 Aug 25, 2005
Jkt 205001
program is to assist charter schools in
meeting their facilities needs. Under
this program, funds are provided on a
competitive basis to States to create new
or enhance existing per-pupil facilities
aid programs on behalf of charter
schools.
In this notice, we are proposing to
establish selection criteria and funding
priorities for this program’s
discretionary grant competitions after
fiscal year (FY) 2004. The proposed
criteria are designed to award grants to
States that are assisting charter schools
with meeting their facility needs, but
still have an unmet need. The proposed
criteria also would be used to assess the
quality of the applicant’s plan, the
proposed grant project team, and the
proposed budget. These criteria would
appear in § 226.12 and are similar to the
criteria that the Department used to
award grants under this program in FY
2004.
Section 226.14 of the proposed
regulations would include two
competitive preference priorities. The
proposed priority in § 226.14(a) is
designed to meet the need for facilities
in areas with the greatest need for
public school choice. In some cases,
there are an insufficient number of
classroom seats to provide public school
choice. Under the proposed priority in
§ 226.14(b), we would award additional
points to States that have not previously
received a grant under the program.
Section 226.21 of the proposed
regulations would clarify that
construction and the purchase of real
property are allowable expenditures
under this program. Under 34 CFR
75.533, these expenditures are
prohibited unless either the program
statute or the implementing regulations
explicitly authorize them. Because
expenditures for construction and the
purchase of real property are critical to
implementing successful school facility
programs, we are proposing that they be
authorized in the implementing
regulations. Proposed § 226.21 also lists
other allowable uses of grant funds
under this program.
Proposed § 226.22 indicates the types
of expenditures that would fall under
the five percent cap on administrative
expenses. This proposed regulation is
based on a statutory cap of five percent
that applies to evaluation, technical
assistance, and dissemination. Proposed
§ 226.22 is designed to maximize the
amount of funds available for charter
schools while still providing States with
sufficient funds to adequately
administer the program.
PO 00000
Frm 00037
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Executive Order 12866
1. Potential Costs and Benefits
Under Executive Order 12866, we
have assessed the potential costs and
benefits of this regulatory action.
The potential costs associated with
the proposed regulations are those
resulting from statutory requirements
and those we have determined to be
necessary for administering this
program effectively and efficiently.
Elsewhere in this SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION section we identify and
explain burdens specifically associated
with information collection
requirements. See the heading
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
In assessing the potential costs and
benefits—both quantitative and
qualitative—of this regulatory action,
we have determined that the benefits
would justify the costs.
We have also determined that this
regulatory action would not unduly
interfere with State, local, and tribal
governments in the exercise of their
governmental functions.
Summary of Potential Costs and
Benefits
The Secretary believes that these
regulations are necessary to clarify
complex statutory provisions. As noted
elsewhere in this notice, these proposed
regulations add clarity where the statute
is ambiguous or reorganize statutory
material to facilitate a better
understanding of the statute’s
requirements. Nearly all of the benefits
and costs of these proposed regulations
stem from the underlying statute and
not the regulations. The costs associated
with these proposed regulations are not
only minimal but are also justified in
terms of the benefits that applicants for
these discretionary grants will receive.
The statute requires an application, but
the types of information that would be
collected through the proposed
selection criteria should be readily
available to applicants under this
program and would impose minimal
burden on applicants.
2. Clarity of the Regulations
Executive Order 12866 and the
Presidential memorandum on ‘‘Plain
Language in Government Writing’’
require each agency to write regulations
that are easy to understand.
The Secretary invites comments on
how to make these proposed regulations
easier to understand, including answers
to questions such as the following:
• Are the requirements in the
proposed regulations clearly stated?
E:\FR\FM\26AUP1.SGM
26AUP1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 165 / Friday, August 26, 2005 / Proposed Rules
• Do the proposed regulations contain
technical terms or other wording that
interferes with their clarity?
• Does the format of the proposed
regulations (grouping and order of
sections, use of headings, paragraphing,
etc.) aid or reduce their clarity?
• Would the proposed regulations be
easier to understand if we divided them
into more (but shorter) sections? (A
‘‘section’’ is preceded by the symbol
‘‘§ ’’ and a numbered heading; for
example, § 226.1 What is the State
Charter School Facilities Incentive
program?)
• Could the description of the
proposed regulations in the
‘‘Supplementary Information’’ section of
this preamble be more helpful in
making the proposed regulations easier
to understand? If so, how?
• What else could we do to make the
proposed regulations easier to
understand?
Send any comments that concern how
the Department could make these
proposed regulations easier to
understand to the person listed in the
ADDRESSES section of the preamble.
Regulatory Flexibility Act Certification
The Secretary certifies that these
proposed regulations would not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
The small entities that would be
tangentially affected by these proposed
regulations are small grantees and,
tangentially, small charter schools that
ultimately benefit from services
provided by grantees. In addition, we do
not believe that the regulations would
have a significant economic impact on
the limited number of small charter
schools affected because the proposed
regulations would not impose excessive
regulatory burdens on those entities or
require unnecessary Federal
supervision.
The proposed regulations would
benefit both small and large entities in
that they clarify confusing and complex
statutory requirements. Also, because
the statute requires State Charter School
Facilities Incentive applicants to apply
to the Department if they wish to
receive discretionary funds, it would be
difficult for the Department to award
funds without the application
information specified in the proposed
regulations. The proposed regulations
will ensure that applicants do not
provide a significant amount of
information that is already available to
the Department.
The proposed regulations would
impose minimal requirements for all
applicants and minimal requirements
with which grant recipients must
VerDate jul<14>2003
16:35 Aug 25, 2005
Jkt 205001
comply. However, the Secretary
specifically invites comments on the
effects of the proposed regulations on
small entities, and on whether there
may be further opportunities to reduce
any potential adverse impact or increase
potential benefits resulting from these
proposed regulations without impeding
the effective and efficient
administration of the State Charter
School Facilities Incentive program.
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
Sections 226.12, 226.13, and 226.14 of
these proposed regulations contain
information collection requirements.
Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of
1995 (44 U.S.C. 3507(d)), the
Department has submitted a copy of
these sections to OMB for its review.
Collection of Information: State
Charter School Facilities Incentive
Grant program.
The Department will use the
information collected through the
selection criteria and competitive
preference priorities to determine
whether to fund applicants. Since the
statute requires applicants to apply for
funds, the Department would not be
able to award these funds without the
application to collect the required
information.
We estimate the annual reporting and
recordkeeping burden for this collection
of information to average 40 hours for
each respondent for 10 applicants,
including the time for reviewing
instructions, searching existing data
sources, gathering and maintaining the
data needed, and completing and
reviewing the collection of information.
Thus, we estimate the total annual
reporting and recordkeeping burden for
this collection to be 400 hours.
If you want to comment on the
information collection requirements,
please send your comments to the Office
of Information and Regulatory Affairs,
OMB, room 10235, New Executive
Office Building, Washington, DC 20503;
Attention: Desk Officer for U.S.
Department of Education. You may also
send a copy of these comments to the
Department representative named in the
ADDRESSES section of this preamble.
We consider your comments on this
proposed collection of information in—
• Deciding whether the proposed
collection is necessary for the proper
performance of our functions, including
whether the information will have
practical use;
• Evaluating the accuracy of our
estimate of the burden of the proposed
collection, including the validity of our
methodology and assumptions;
PO 00000
Frm 00038
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
50259
• Enhancing the quality, usefulness,
and clarity of the information we
collect; and
• Minimizing the burden on those
who must respond. This includes
exploring the use of appropriate
automated, electronic, mechanical, or
other technological collection
techniques or other forms of information
technology (e.g., permitting electronic
submission of responses).
OMB is required to make a decision
concerning the collection of information
contained in these proposed regulations
between 30 and 60 days after
publication of this document in the
Federal Register. Therefore, to ensure
that OMB gives your comments full
consideration, it is important that OMB
receives the comments within 30 days
of publication. This does not affect the
deadline for your comments to us on the
proposed regulations.
Intergovernmental Review
This program is subject to Executive
Order 12372 and the regulations in 34
CFR part 79. One of the objectives of the
Executive order is to foster an
intergovernmental partnership and a
strengthened federalism. The Executive
order relies on processes developed by
State and local governments for
coordination and review of proposed
Federal financial assistance.
This document provides early
notification of our specific plans and
actions for this program.
Electronic Access to This Document
You may view this document, as well
as all other Department of Education
documents published in the Federal
Register, in text or Adobe Portable
Document Format (PDF) on the Internet
at the following site: www.ed.gov/news/
fedregister.
To use PDF you must have Adobe
Acrobat Reader, which is available free
at this site. If you have questions about
using PDF, call the U.S. Government
Printing Office (GPO), toll free, at 1–
888–293–6498; or in the Washington,
DC, area at (202) 512–1530.
You may also view this document in
PDF at the following site: https://
www.ed.gov/programs/charterfacilities/
index.html.
Note: The official version of this document
is the document published in the Federal
Register. Free Internet access to the official
edition of the Federal Register and the Code
of Federal Regulations is available on GPO
Access at: https://www.gpoaccess.gov/nara/
index.html.
(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
Number 84.354A State Charter School
Facilities Incentive program.)
E:\FR\FM\26AUP1.SGM
26AUP1
50260
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 165 / Friday, August 26, 2005 / Proposed Rules
The Secretary of Education has
delegated authority to the Assistant
Deputy Secretary for Innovation and
Improvement to issue these proposed
amendments to 34 CFR Chapter II.
List of Subjects in 34 CFR Part 226
Charter Schools, Education,
Educational facilities, Elementary and
secondary education, Grant programs—
education, Report and recordkeeping
requirements, Schools.
Dated: August 23, 2005.
Nina Shokraii Rees,
Assistant Deputy Secretary for Innovation and
Improvement.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Secretary proposes to
amend title 34 of the Code of Federal
Regulations by adding a new part 226 to
read as follows:
PART 226—STATE CHARTER SCHOOL
FACILITIES INCENTIVE PROGRAM
Subpart A—General
Sec.
226.1 What is the State Charter School
Facilities Incentive program?
226.2 Who is eligible to receive a grant?
226.3 What regulations apply to the State
Charter School Facilities Incentive
program?
226.4 What definitions apply to the State
Charter School Facilities Incentive
program?
Subpart B—How Does the Secretary Award
a Grant?
226.11 How does the Secretary evaluate an
application?
226.12 What selection criteria does the
Secretary use in evaluating an
application for a State Charter School
Facilities Incentive program grant?
226.13 What statutory funding priority does
the Secretary use in making a grant
award?
226.14 What other funding priorities may
the Secretary use in making a grant
award?
Subpart C—What Conditions Must Be Met
by a Grantee?
226.21 How may charter schools use these
funds?
226.22 May grantees use grant funds for
administrative costs?
226.23 May charter schools use grant funds
for administrative costs?
Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1221e–3; 7221d(b),
unless otherwise noted.
Subpart A—General
(1) Establish new per-pupil facilities
aid programs for charter schools;
(2) Enhance existing per-pupil
facilities aid programs for charter
schools; or
(3) Administer programs described
under paragraphs (b)(1) and (2) of this
section.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 7221d(b))
§ 226.2
Who is eligible to receive a grant?
States are eligible to receive grants
under this program.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 7221(b))
§ 226.3 What regulations apply to the State
Charter School Facilities Incentive
program?
The following regulations apply to the
State Charter School Facilities Incentive
program:
(a) The Education Department General
Administrative Regulations (EDGAR) as
follows:
(1) 34 CFR part 74 (Administration of
Grants and Agreements with Institutions
of Higher Education, Hospitals, and
other Non-Profit Organizations).
(2) 34 CFR part 75 (Direct Grant
Programs).
(3) 34 CFR part 77 (Definitions that
Apply to Department Regulations).
(4) 34 CFR part 79 (Intergovernmental
Review of Department of Education
Programs and Activities).
(5) 34 CFR part 80 (Uniform
Administrative Requirements for Grants
and Cooperative Agreements to State
and Local Governments).
(6) 34 CFR part 81 (General Education
Provisions Act—Enforcement).
(7) 34 CFR part 82 (New Restrictions
on Lobbying).
(8) 34 CFR part 84 (Governmentwide
Requirements for Drug-Free Workplace
(Financial Assistance)).
(9) 34 CFR part 85 (Governmentwide
Debarment and Suspension
(Nonprocurement)).
(10) 34 CFR part 97 (Protection of
Human Subjects).
(11) 34 CFR part 98 (Student Rights in
Research, Experimental Programs, and
Testing).
(12) 34 CFR part 99 (Family
Educational Rights and Privacy).
(b) The regulations in this part 226.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1221e–3; 7221d(b))
§ 226.1 What is the State Charter School
Facilities Incentive program?
§ 226.4 What definitions apply to the State
Charter School Facilities Incentive
program?
(a) The State Charter School Facilities
Incentive program provides grants to
States to help charter schools pay for
facilities.
(b) Grantees must use these grants
to—
(a) Definitions in the statute. The
following term used in this part is
defined in section 5210 of the
Elementary and Secondary Education
Act of 1965, as amended (ESEA):
Charter school
VerDate jul<14>2003
16:35 Aug 25, 2005
Jkt 205001
PO 00000
Frm 00039
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
(b) Definitions in EDGAR. The
following terms used in this part are
defined in 34 CFR 77.1:
Applicant
Application
Award
Department
EDGAR
Facilities
Grant
Grantee
Project
Public
Secretary
(c) Other definition. The following
definition also applies to this part:
Construction means—
(1) Preparing drawings and
specifications for school facilities
projects;
(2) Repairing, renovating, or altering
school facilities;
(3) Extending school facilities as
described in 34 CFR 222.172(b);
(4) Erecting or building school
facilities; and
(5) Inspections or supervision related
to school facilities.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 7221d(b); 7221i(1))
Subpart B—How Does the Secretary
Award a Grant?
§ 226.11 How does the Secretary evaluate
an application?
(a) The Secretary evaluates an
application on the basis of the criteria
in § 226.12 and the competitive
preference priorities in § 226.13 and
§ 226.14.
(b) The Secretary informs applicants
of the maximum possible score for each
criterion and competitive preference
priority in the application package or in
a notice published in the Federal
Register.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 7221d(b))
§ 226.12 What selection criteria does the
Secretary use in evaluating an application
for a State Charter School Facilities
Incentive program grant?
The selection criteria for this program
are as follows:
(a) Need for facility funding. (1) The
need for per-pupil charter school facility
funding in the State.
(2) The extent to which the proposal
meets the need to fund charter school
facilities on a per-pupil basis.
(b) Quality of plan. (1) The likelihood
that the proposed grant project will
result in the State either retaining a new
per-pupil facilities aid program or
continuing to enhance such a program
without the total amount of assistance
E:\FR\FM\26AUP1.SGM
26AUP1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 165 / Friday, August 26, 2005 / Proposed Rules
(State and Federal) declining over a fiveyear period.
(2) The flexibility charter schools
have in their use of facility funds for the
various authorized purposes.
(3) The quality of the plan for
identifying charter schools and
determining their eligibility to receive
funds.
(4) The per-pupil facilities aid
formula’s ability to target resources to
charter schools with the greatest need
and the highest proportions of students
in poverty.
(5) For projects that plan to reserve
funds for evaluation, the quality of the
applicant’s plan to use grant funds for
this purpose.
(6) For projects that plan to reserve
funds for technical assistance,
dissemination, or personnel, the quality
of the applicant’s plan to use grant
funds for these purposes.
(c) The grant project team. (1) The
qualifications, including relevant
training and experience, of the project
manager and other members of the grant
project team, including employees not
paid with grant funds, consultants, and
subcontractors.
(2) The adequacy and appropriateness
of the applicant’s staffing plan for the
grant project.
(d) The budget. (1) The extent to
which the requested grant amount and
the project costs are reasonable in
relation to the objectives, design, and
potential significance of the proposed
grant project.
(2) The extent to which the costs are
reasonable in relation to the number of
students served and to the anticipated
results and benefits.
(3) The extent to which the nonFederal share exceeds the minimum
percentages (which are based on the
percentages under section 5205(b)(2)(C)
of the ESEA), particularly in the initial
years of the program.
(e) State experience. The experience
of the State in addressing the facility
needs of charter schools through various
means, including providing per-pupil
aid, access to State loan or bonding
pools, and the use of Qualified Zone
Academy Bonds.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 7221d(b))
§ 226.13 What statutory funding priority
does the Secretary use in making a grant
award?
The Secretary shall award additional
points under a competitive preference
priority regarding:
(a) Periodic Review and Evaluation.
The State provides for periodic review
and evaluation by the authorized public
chartering agency of each charter school
at least once every five years unless
VerDate jul<14>2003
16:35 Aug 25, 2005
Jkt 205001
required more frequently by State law,
to determine whether the charter school
is meeting the terms of the school’s
charter and is meeting or exceeding the
student academic performance
requirements and goals for charter
schools as set forth under State law or
the school’s charter.
(b) Number of High-Quality Charter
Schools. The State has demonstrated
progress in increasing the number of
high-quality charter schools that are
held accountable in the terms of the
schools’ charters for meeting clear and
measurable objectives for the
educational progress of the students
attending the schools, in the period
prior to the period for which the State
applies for a grant under this
competition.
(c) One Authorized Public Chartering
Agency Other than an LEA, or an
Appeals Process. The State—
(1) Provides for one authorized public
chartering agency that is not a local
educational agency (LEA), such as a
State chartering board, for each
individual or entity seeking to operate a
charter school pursuant to State law; or
(2) In the case of a State in which
LEAs are the only authorized public
chartering agencies, allows for an
appeals process for the denial of an
application for a charter school.
(d) High Degree of Autonomy. The
State ensures that each charter school
has a high degree of autonomy over the
charter school’s budgets and
expenditures.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 7221b; 7221d(b))
§ 226.14 What other funding priorities may
the Secretary use in making a grant award?
(a) The Secretary may award points to
an application under a competitive
preference priority regarding the
capacity of charter schools to offer
public school choice in those
communities with the greatest need for
this choice based on—
(1) The extent to which the applicant
would target services to geographic
areas in which a large proportion or
number of public schools have been
identified for improvement, corrective
action, or restructuring under title I of
the ESEA;
(2) The extent to which the applicant
would target services to geographic
areas in which a large proportion of
students perform poorly on State
academic assessments; and
(3) The extent to which the applicant
would target services to communities
with large proportions of low-income
students.
(b) The Secretary may award points to
an application under a competitive
preference priority for applicants that
PO 00000
Frm 00040
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
50261
have not previously received a grant
under the program.
(c) The Secretary may elect to
consider the points awarded under
these priorities only for proposals that
exhibit sufficient quality to warrant
funding under the selection criteria in
§ 226.12 of this part.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 7221d(b))
Subpart C—What Conditions Must Be
Met by a Grantee?
§ 226.21 How may charter schools use
these funds?
(a) Charter schools that receive grant
funds through their State must use the
funds for facilities. Except as provided
in paragraph (b) of this section,
allowable expenditures include:
(1) Rent.
(2) Purchase of building or land.
(3) Construction.
(4) Renovation of an existing school
facility.
(5) Leasehold improvements.
(6) Debt service on a school facility.
(b) Charter schools may not use these
grant funds for purchasing land when
they have no immediate plans to
construct a building on that land.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 7221d(b))
§ 226.22 May grantees use grant funds for
administrative costs?
State grantees may use up to five
percent of their grant award for
administrative expenses that include:
indirect costs, evaluation, technical
assistance, dissemination, personnel
costs, and any other costs involved in
administering the State’s per-pupil
facilities aid program.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 7221d(b))
§ 226.23 May charter schools use grant
funds for administrative costs?
(a) Except as provided in paragraph
(b) of this section, charter school
subgrantees may use grant funds for
administrative costs that are necessary
and reasonable for the proper and
efficient performance and
administration of this Federal grant.
This use of funds, as well as indirect
costs and rates, must comply with
EDGAR and the Office of Management
and Budget Circular A–87 (Cost
Principles for State, Local, and Indian
Tribal Governments).
(b) Consistent with the requirements
in 34 CFR 75.564(c)(2), any charter
school subgrantees that use grant funds
for construction activities may not be
reimbursed for indirect costs for those
activities.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1221e-3; 7221d(b))
[FR Doc. 05–17049 Filed 8–25–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000–01–P
E:\FR\FM\26AUP1.SGM
26AUP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 165 (Friday, August 26, 2005)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 50257-50261]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-17049]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
34 CFR Part 226
State Charter School Facilities Incentive Program
AGENCY: Office of Innovation and Improvement, Department of Education.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Secretary issues these proposed regulations to administer
the State Charter School Facilities Incentive program. Under this
program, the Department of Education (``Department'') provides
competitive grants to States to help charter schools meet their need
for facilities.
DATES: We must receive your comments on or before September 26, 2005.
ADDRESSES: Address all comments about these proposed regulations to Jim
Houser, U.S. Department of Education, 400 Maryland Avenue, SW., room
4W245, Washington, DC 20202-6140. If you prefer to send your comments
through the Internet, you may address them to us at the U.S. Government
Web site: https://www.regulations.gov; or you may send your Internet
comments to us at the following address: comments@ed.gov.
You must include the term ``state incentive'' in the subject line
of your electronic message.
If you want to comment on the information collection requirements,
you must send your comments to the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) at the address listed in the Paperwork Reduction Act section of
this preamble. You may also send a copy of these comments to the
Department representative named in this section.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ann Margaret Galiatsos or Jim Houser,
U.S. Department of Education, 400 Maryland Avenue, SW., Washington, DC
20202-6140. Telephone: (202) 205-9765 or via Internet:
charter.facilities@ed.gov.
[[Page 50258]]
If you use a telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD), you may
call the Federal Relay Service (FRS) at 1-800-877-8339.
Individuals with disabilities may obtain this document in an
alternative format (e.g., Braille, large print, audiotape, or computer
diskette) on request to the contact person listed under FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Invitation To Comment
We invite you to submit comments regarding these proposed
regulations. To ensure that your comments have maximum effect in
developing the final regulations, we urge you to identify clearly the
specific section or sections of the proposed regulations that each of
your comments addresses and to arrange your comments in the same order
as the proposed regulations.
We also invite you to assist us in complying with the specific
requirements of Executive Order 12866 and its overall requirement of
reducing regulatory burden that might result from these proposed
regulations. Please let us know of any further opportunities we should
take to reduce potential costs or increase potential benefits while
preserving the effective and efficient administration of the program.
During and after the comment period, you may inspect all public
comments about these proposed regulations in room 4W259, 400 Maryland
Avenue, SW., Washington, DC, between the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 4 p.m.,
Eastern time, Monday through Friday of each week except Federal
holidays.
Assistance to Individuals With Disabilities in Reviewing the Rulemaking
Record
On request, we will supply an appropriate aid, such as a reader or
print magnifier, to an individual with a disability who needs
assistance to review the comments or other documents in the public
rulemaking record for these proposed regulations. If you want to
schedule an appointment for this type of aid, please contact the person
listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.
Background
These proposed regulations would apply to the State Charter School
Facilities Incentive program, which is authorized under title V, part
B, subpart 1 of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965, as
amended by the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 (Pub. L. 107-110,
enacted January 8, 2002) (Act). The purpose of this program is to
assist charter schools in meeting their facilities needs. Under this
program, funds are provided on a competitive basis to States to create
new or enhance existing per-pupil facilities aid programs on behalf of
charter schools.
In this notice, we are proposing to establish selection criteria
and funding priorities for this program's discretionary grant
competitions after fiscal year (FY) 2004. The proposed criteria are
designed to award grants to States that are assisting charter schools
with meeting their facility needs, but still have an unmet need. The
proposed criteria also would be used to assess the quality of the
applicant's plan, the proposed grant project team, and the proposed
budget. These criteria would appear in Sec. 226.12 and are similar to
the criteria that the Department used to award grants under this
program in FY 2004.
Section 226.14 of the proposed regulations would include two
competitive preference priorities. The proposed priority in Sec.
226.14(a) is designed to meet the need for facilities in areas with the
greatest need for public school choice. In some cases, there are an
insufficient number of classroom seats to provide public school choice.
Under the proposed priority in Sec. 226.14(b), we would award
additional points to States that have not previously received a grant
under the program.
Section 226.21 of the proposed regulations would clarify that
construction and the purchase of real property are allowable
expenditures under this program. Under 34 CFR 75.533, these
expenditures are prohibited unless either the program statute or the
implementing regulations explicitly authorize them. Because
expenditures for construction and the purchase of real property are
critical to implementing successful school facility programs, we are
proposing that they be authorized in the implementing regulations.
Proposed Sec. 226.21 also lists other allowable uses of grant funds
under this program.
Proposed Sec. 226.22 indicates the types of expenditures that
would fall under the five percent cap on administrative expenses. This
proposed regulation is based on a statutory cap of five percent that
applies to evaluation, technical assistance, and dissemination.
Proposed Sec. 226.22 is designed to maximize the amount of funds
available for charter schools while still providing States with
sufficient funds to adequately administer the program.
Executive Order 12866
1. Potential Costs and Benefits
Under Executive Order 12866, we have assessed the potential costs
and benefits of this regulatory action.
The potential costs associated with the proposed regulations are
those resulting from statutory requirements and those we have
determined to be necessary for administering this program effectively
and efficiently. Elsewhere in this SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section we
identify and explain burdens specifically associated with information
collection requirements. See the heading Paperwork Reduction Act of
1995.
In assessing the potential costs and benefits--both quantitative
and qualitative--of this regulatory action, we have determined that the
benefits would justify the costs.
We have also determined that this regulatory action would not
unduly interfere with State, local, and tribal governments in the
exercise of their governmental functions.
Summary of Potential Costs and Benefits
The Secretary believes that these regulations are necessary to
clarify complex statutory provisions. As noted elsewhere in this
notice, these proposed regulations add clarity where the statute is
ambiguous or reorganize statutory material to facilitate a better
understanding of the statute's requirements. Nearly all of the benefits
and costs of these proposed regulations stem from the underlying
statute and not the regulations. The costs associated with these
proposed regulations are not only minimal but are also justified in
terms of the benefits that applicants for these discretionary grants
will receive. The statute requires an application, but the types of
information that would be collected through the proposed selection
criteria should be readily available to applicants under this program
and would impose minimal burden on applicants.
2. Clarity of the Regulations
Executive Order 12866 and the Presidential memorandum on ``Plain
Language in Government Writing'' require each agency to write
regulations that are easy to understand.
The Secretary invites comments on how to make these proposed
regulations easier to understand, including answers to questions such
as the following:
Are the requirements in the proposed regulations clearly
stated?
[[Page 50259]]
Do the proposed regulations contain technical terms or
other wording that interferes with their clarity?
Does the format of the proposed regulations (grouping and
order of sections, use of headings, paragraphing, etc.) aid or reduce
their clarity?
Would the proposed regulations be easier to understand if
we divided them into more (but shorter) sections? (A ``section'' is
preceded by the symbol ``Sec. '' and a numbered heading; for example,
Sec. 226.1 What is the State Charter School Facilities Incentive
program?)
Could the description of the proposed regulations in the
``Supplementary Information'' section of this preamble be more helpful
in making the proposed regulations easier to understand? If so, how?
What else could we do to make the proposed regulations
easier to understand?
Send any comments that concern how the Department could make these
proposed regulations easier to understand to the person listed in the
ADDRESSES section of the preamble.
Regulatory Flexibility Act Certification
The Secretary certifies that these proposed regulations would not
have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities. The small entities that would be tangentially affected by
these proposed regulations are small grantees and, tangentially, small
charter schools that ultimately benefit from services provided by
grantees. In addition, we do not believe that the regulations would
have a significant economic impact on the limited number of small
charter schools affected because the proposed regulations would not
impose excessive regulatory burdens on those entities or require
unnecessary Federal supervision.
The proposed regulations would benefit both small and large
entities in that they clarify confusing and complex statutory
requirements. Also, because the statute requires State Charter School
Facilities Incentive applicants to apply to the Department if they wish
to receive discretionary funds, it would be difficult for the
Department to award funds without the application information specified
in the proposed regulations. The proposed regulations will ensure that
applicants do not provide a significant amount of information that is
already available to the Department.
The proposed regulations would impose minimal requirements for all
applicants and minimal requirements with which grant recipients must
comply. However, the Secretary specifically invites comments on the
effects of the proposed regulations on small entities, and on whether
there may be further opportunities to reduce any potential adverse
impact or increase potential benefits resulting from these proposed
regulations without impeding the effective and efficient administration
of the State Charter School Facilities Incentive program.
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
Sections 226.12, 226.13, and 226.14 of these proposed regulations
contain information collection requirements. Under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3507(d)), the Department has submitted
a copy of these sections to OMB for its review.
Collection of Information: State Charter School Facilities
Incentive Grant program.
The Department will use the information collected through the
selection criteria and competitive preference priorities to determine
whether to fund applicants. Since the statute requires applicants to
apply for funds, the Department would not be able to award these funds
without the application to collect the required information.
We estimate the annual reporting and recordkeeping burden for this
collection of information to average 40 hours for each respondent for
10 applicants, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching
existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and
completing and reviewing the collection of information. Thus, we
estimate the total annual reporting and recordkeeping burden for this
collection to be 400 hours.
If you want to comment on the information collection requirements,
please send your comments to the Office of Information and Regulatory
Affairs, OMB, room 10235, New Executive Office Building, Washington, DC
20503; Attention: Desk Officer for U.S. Department of Education. You
may also send a copy of these comments to the Department representative
named in the ADDRESSES section of this preamble.
We consider your comments on this proposed collection of
information in--
Deciding whether the proposed collection is necessary for
the proper performance of our functions, including whether the
information will have practical use;
Evaluating the accuracy of our estimate of the burden of
the proposed collection, including the validity of our methodology and
assumptions;
Enhancing the quality, usefulness, and clarity of the
information we collect; and
Minimizing the burden on those who must respond. This
includes exploring the use of appropriate automated, electronic,
mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or other forms
of information technology (e.g., permitting electronic submission of
responses).
OMB is required to make a decision concerning the collection of
information contained in these proposed regulations between 30 and 60
days after publication of this document in the Federal Register.
Therefore, to ensure that OMB gives your comments full consideration,
it is important that OMB receives the comments within 30 days of
publication. This does not affect the deadline for your comments to us
on the proposed regulations.
Intergovernmental Review
This program is subject to Executive Order 12372 and the
regulations in 34 CFR part 79. One of the objectives of the Executive
order is to foster an intergovernmental partnership and a strengthened
federalism. The Executive order relies on processes developed by State
and local governments for coordination and review of proposed Federal
financial assistance.
This document provides early notification of our specific plans and
actions for this program.
Electronic Access to This Document
You may view this document, as well as all other Department of
Education documents published in the Federal Register, in text or Adobe
Portable Document Format (PDF) on the Internet at the following site:
www.ed.gov/news/fedregister.
To use PDF you must have Adobe Acrobat Reader, which is available
free at this site. If you have questions about using PDF, call the U.S.
Government Printing Office (GPO), toll free, at 1-888-293-6498; or in
the Washington, DC, area at (202) 512-1530.
You may also view this document in PDF at the following site:
https://www.ed.gov/programs/charterfacilities/.
Note: The official version of this document is the document
published in the Federal Register. Free Internet access to the
official edition of the Federal Register and the Code of Federal
Regulations is available on GPO Access at: https://www.gpoaccess.gov/
nara/.
(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 84.354A State Charter
School Facilities Incentive program.)
[[Page 50260]]
The Secretary of Education has delegated authority to the Assistant
Deputy Secretary for Innovation and Improvement to issue these proposed
amendments to 34 CFR Chapter II.
List of Subjects in 34 CFR Part 226
Charter Schools, Education, Educational facilities, Elementary and
secondary education, Grant programs--education, Report and
recordkeeping requirements, Schools.
Dated: August 23, 2005.
Nina Shokraii Rees,
Assistant Deputy Secretary for Innovation and Improvement.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Secretary proposes
to amend title 34 of the Code of Federal Regulations by adding a new
part 226 to read as follows:
PART 226--STATE CHARTER SCHOOL FACILITIES INCENTIVE PROGRAM
Subpart A--General
Sec.
226.1 What is the State Charter School Facilities Incentive program?
226.2 Who is eligible to receive a grant?
226.3 What regulations apply to the State Charter School Facilities
Incentive program?
226.4 What definitions apply to the State Charter School Facilities
Incentive program?
Subpart B--How Does the Secretary Award a Grant?
226.11 How does the Secretary evaluate an application?
226.12 What selection criteria does the Secretary use in evaluating
an application for a State Charter School Facilities Incentive
program grant?
226.13 What statutory funding priority does the Secretary use in
making a grant award?
226.14 What other funding priorities may the Secretary use in making
a grant award?
Subpart C--What Conditions Must Be Met by a Grantee?
226.21 How may charter schools use these funds?
226.22 May grantees use grant funds for administrative costs?
226.23 May charter schools use grant funds for administrative costs?
Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1221e-3; 7221d(b), unless otherwise noted.
Subpart A--General
Sec. 226.1 What is the State Charter School Facilities Incentive
program?
(a) The State Charter School Facilities Incentive program provides
grants to States to help charter schools pay for facilities.
(b) Grantees must use these grants to--
(1) Establish new per-pupil facilities aid programs for charter
schools;
(2) Enhance existing per-pupil facilities aid programs for charter
schools; or
(3) Administer programs described under paragraphs (b)(1) and (2)
of this section.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 7221d(b))
Sec. 226.2 Who is eligible to receive a grant?
States are eligible to receive grants under this program.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 7221(b))
Sec. 226.3 What regulations apply to the State Charter School
Facilities Incentive program?
The following regulations apply to the State Charter School
Facilities Incentive program:
(a) The Education Department General Administrative Regulations
(EDGAR) as follows:
(1) 34 CFR part 74 (Administration of Grants and Agreements with
Institutions of Higher Education, Hospitals, and other Non-Profit
Organizations).
(2) 34 CFR part 75 (Direct Grant Programs).
(3) 34 CFR part 77 (Definitions that Apply to Department
Regulations).
(4) 34 CFR part 79 (Intergovernmental Review of Department of
Education Programs and Activities).
(5) 34 CFR part 80 (Uniform Administrative Requirements for Grants
and Cooperative Agreements to State and Local Governments).
(6) 34 CFR part 81 (General Education Provisions Act--Enforcement).
(7) 34 CFR part 82 (New Restrictions on Lobbying).
(8) 34 CFR part 84 (Governmentwide Requirements for Drug-Free
Workplace (Financial Assistance)).
(9) 34 CFR part 85 (Governmentwide Debarment and Suspension
(Nonprocurement)).
(10) 34 CFR part 97 (Protection of Human Subjects).
(11) 34 CFR part 98 (Student Rights in Research, Experimental
Programs, and Testing).
(12) 34 CFR part 99 (Family Educational Rights and Privacy).
(b) The regulations in this part 226.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1221e-3; 7221d(b))
Sec. 226.4 What definitions apply to the State Charter School
Facilities Incentive program?
(a) Definitions in the statute. The following term used in this
part is defined in section 5210 of the Elementary and Secondary
Education Act of 1965, as amended (ESEA):
Charter school
(b) Definitions in EDGAR. The following terms used in this part are
defined in 34 CFR 77.1:
Applicant
Application
Award
Department
EDGAR
Facilities
Grant
Grantee
Project
Public
Secretary
(c) Other definition. The following definition also applies to this
part:
Construction means--
(1) Preparing drawings and specifications for school facilities
projects;
(2) Repairing, renovating, or altering school facilities;
(3) Extending school facilities as described in 34 CFR 222.172(b);
(4) Erecting or building school facilities; and
(5) Inspections or supervision related to school facilities.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 7221d(b); 7221i(1))
Subpart B--How Does the Secretary Award a Grant?
Sec. 226.11 How does the Secretary evaluate an application?
(a) The Secretary evaluates an application on the basis of the
criteria in Sec. 226.12 and the competitive preference priorities in
Sec. 226.13 and Sec. 226.14.
(b) The Secretary informs applicants of the maximum possible score
for each criterion and competitive preference priority in the
application package or in a notice published in the Federal Register.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 7221d(b))
Sec. 226.12 What selection criteria does the Secretary use in
evaluating an application for a State Charter School Facilities
Incentive program grant?
The selection criteria for this program are as follows:
(a) Need for facility funding. (1) The need for per-pupil charter
school facility funding in the State.
(2) The extent to which the proposal meets the need to fund charter
school facilities on a per-pupil basis.
(b) Quality of plan. (1) The likelihood that the proposed grant
project will result in the State either retaining a new per-pupil
facilities aid program or continuing to enhance such a program without
the total amount of assistance
[[Page 50261]]
(State and Federal) declining over a five-year period.
(2) The flexibility charter schools have in their use of facility
funds for the various authorized purposes.
(3) The quality of the plan for identifying charter schools and
determining their eligibility to receive funds.
(4) The per-pupil facilities aid formula's ability to target
resources to charter schools with the greatest need and the highest
proportions of students in poverty.
(5) For projects that plan to reserve funds for evaluation, the
quality of the applicant's plan to use grant funds for this purpose.
(6) For projects that plan to reserve funds for technical
assistance, dissemination, or personnel, the quality of the applicant's
plan to use grant funds for these purposes.
(c) The grant project team. (1) The qualifications, including
relevant training and experience, of the project manager and other
members of the grant project team, including employees not paid with
grant funds, consultants, and subcontractors.
(2) The adequacy and appropriateness of the applicant's staffing
plan for the grant project.
(d) The budget. (1) The extent to which the requested grant amount
and the project costs are reasonable in relation to the objectives,
design, and potential significance of the proposed grant project.
(2) The extent to which the costs are reasonable in relation to the
number of students served and to the anticipated results and benefits.
(3) The extent to which the non-Federal share exceeds the minimum
percentages (which are based on the percentages under section
5205(b)(2)(C) of the ESEA), particularly in the initial years of the
program.
(e) State experience. The experience of the State in addressing the
facility needs of charter schools through various means, including
providing per-pupil aid, access to State loan or bonding pools, and the
use of Qualified Zone Academy Bonds.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 7221d(b))
Sec. 226.13 What statutory funding priority does the Secretary use in
making a grant award?
The Secretary shall award additional points under a competitive
preference priority regarding:
(a) Periodic Review and Evaluation. The State provides for periodic
review and evaluation by the authorized public chartering agency of
each charter school at least once every five years unless required more
frequently by State law, to determine whether the charter school is
meeting the terms of the school's charter and is meeting or exceeding
the student academic performance requirements and goals for charter
schools as set forth under State law or the school's charter.
(b) Number of High-Quality Charter Schools. The State has
demonstrated progress in increasing the number of high-quality charter
schools that are held accountable in the terms of the schools' charters
for meeting clear and measurable objectives for the educational
progress of the students attending the schools, in the period prior to
the period for which the State applies for a grant under this
competition.
(c) One Authorized Public Chartering Agency Other than an LEA, or
an Appeals Process. The State--
(1) Provides for one authorized public chartering agency that is
not a local educational agency (LEA), such as a State chartering board,
for each individual or entity seeking to operate a charter school
pursuant to State law; or
(2) In the case of a State in which LEAs are the only authorized
public chartering agencies, allows for an appeals process for the
denial of an application for a charter school.
(d) High Degree of Autonomy. The State ensures that each charter
school has a high degree of autonomy over the charter school's budgets
and expenditures.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 7221b; 7221d(b))
Sec. 226.14 What other funding priorities may the Secretary use in
making a grant award?
(a) The Secretary may award points to an application under a
competitive preference priority regarding the capacity of charter
schools to offer public school choice in those communities with the
greatest need for this choice based on--
(1) The extent to which the applicant would target services to
geographic areas in which a large proportion or number of public
schools have been identified for improvement, corrective action, or
restructuring under title I of the ESEA;
(2) The extent to which the applicant would target services to
geographic areas in which a large proportion of students perform poorly
on State academic assessments; and
(3) The extent to which the applicant would target services to
communities with large proportions of low-income students.
(b) The Secretary may award points to an application under a
competitive preference priority for applicants that have not previously
received a grant under the program.
(c) The Secretary may elect to consider the points awarded under
these priorities only for proposals that exhibit sufficient quality to
warrant funding under the selection criteria in Sec. 226.12 of this
part.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 7221d(b))
Subpart C--What Conditions Must Be Met by a Grantee?
Sec. 226.21 How may charter schools use these funds?
(a) Charter schools that receive grant funds through their State
must use the funds for facilities. Except as provided in paragraph (b)
of this section, allowable expenditures include:
(1) Rent.
(2) Purchase of building or land.
(3) Construction.
(4) Renovation of an existing school facility.
(5) Leasehold improvements.
(6) Debt service on a school facility.
(b) Charter schools may not use these grant funds for purchasing
land when they have no immediate plans to construct a building on that
land.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 7221d(b))
Sec. 226.22 May grantees use grant funds for administrative costs?
State grantees may use up to five percent of their grant award for
administrative expenses that include: indirect costs, evaluation,
technical assistance, dissemination, personnel costs, and any other
costs involved in administering the State's per-pupil facilities aid
program.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 7221d(b))
Sec. 226.23 May charter schools use grant funds for administrative
costs?
(a) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, charter
school subgrantees may use grant funds for administrative costs that
are necessary and reasonable for the proper and efficient performance
and administration of this Federal grant. This use of funds, as well as
indirect costs and rates, must comply with EDGAR and the Office of
Management and Budget Circular A-87 (Cost Principles for State, Local,
and Indian Tribal Governments).
(b) Consistent with the requirements in 34 CFR 75.564(c)(2), any
charter school subgrantees that use grant funds for construction
activities may not be reimbursed for indirect costs for those
activities.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1221e-3; 7221d(b))
[FR Doc. 05-17049 Filed 8-25-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000-01-P