Certain Hot-Rolled Carbon Steel Flat Products from India: Notice of Extension of Time Limit for Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 49556-49557 [E5-4632]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
49556
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 163 / Wednesday, August 24, 2005 / Notices
Private businesses use these estimates
to determine market share and to
perform other analysis. It is extremely
important to both the public and the
private sectors that accurate and timely
measures of consumer spending be
made readily available.
Affected Public: Business or other forprofit.
Frequency: Annually.
Respondent’s Obligation: Mandatory.
Legal Authority: Title 13 U.S.C.,
Sections 182, 224, and 225.
OMB Desk Officer: Susan Schechter,
(202) 395–5103.
Copies of the above information
collection proposal can be obtained by
calling or writing Diana Hynek,
Departmental Paperwork Clearance
Officer, (202) 482–0266, Department of
Commerce, room 6625, 14th and
Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington,
DC 20230 (or via the Internet at
dhynek@doc.gov).
Written comments and
recommendations for the proposed
information collection should be sent
within 30 days of publication of this
notice to Susan Schechter, OMB Desk
Officer either by fax (202–395–7245) or
e-mail (susan_schechter@omb.eop.gov).
Dated: August 18, 2005.
Madeleine Clayton,
Management Analyst, Office of the Chief
Information Officer.
[FR Doc. 05–16830 Filed 8–23–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–07–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Submission for OMB Review;
Comment Request
DOC has submitted to the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) for
clearance the following proposal for
collection of information under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction
Act (44 U.S.C. chapter 35).
Agency: U.S. Census Bureau.
Title: 2006 Census Test.
Form Number(s): DD–1, DD–1(E/S),
DD–A(RQ), DD–1(E), DD–1(E)SUPP,
DD–1(E)R, DD–20, D–20(S).
Agency Approval Number: None.
Type of Request: New collection.
Burden: 37,808 hours.
Number of Respondents: 239,890.
Avg Hours Per Response: Households
and reinterview—10 minutes; Persons
in Gqs and reinterview—5 minutes.
Needs and Uses: The U.S. Census
Bureau requests authorization from the
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) to collect data from the public as
part of the 2006 Census Test. The 2006
Census Test is one of a number of tests
planned to improve the 2010 Census.
VerDate jul<14>2003
15:23 Aug 23, 2005
Jkt 205001
Census 2000 was an operational and
data quality success. However, that
success was achieved at great
operational risk and great expense. In
response to the lessons learned from
Census 2000, and in striving to better
meet our Nation’s ever-expanding needs
for social, demographic, and geographic
information, the U.S. Department of
Commerce and the Census Bureau have
developed a multi-year effort to
completely modernize and re-engineer
the 2010 Census of Population and
Housing.
In order to meet our constitutional
and legislative mandates, we must
implement a re-engineered 2010 Census
that is cost-effective, improves coverage,
and reduces operational risk. Achieving
this strategic goal requires an iterative
series of tests that will provide an
opportunity to evaluate new or
improved question wording,
methodology, technology, and
questionnaire design. The 2006 Census
Test is part of this testing cycle, which
has been planned to allow us to finalize
methodologies and operational
procedures in time to conduct a Dress
Rehearsal in 2008 and a successful
census in 2010.
The 2006 Census Test draws heavily
on the results of the 2004 Census Test,
a site test that we conducted to examine
the feasibility of collecting personal
information during Non Response
Followup (NRFU) using Hand Held
Computers (HHCs). The 2004 Census
Test was the first large-scale test of a
HHC in census-like conditions. The
2004 Census Test also studied new
methods to improve coverage, including
procedures for reducing duplication,
and tested respondent reaction to
revised race and Hispanic origin
questions, examples, and instructions.
The 2006 Census Test is a site test
that includes a replacement
questionnaire (in the mailout/mailback
site), a NRFU component, an
enumeration of group quarters (GQs),
and an update/enumerate operation that
includes activities planned to increase
response rates on an American Indian
Reservation. Like the other tests leading
up to the 2010 Census, this test is
designed to evaluate new methods and
systems intended to improve accuracy,
reduce risks, and/or contain costs. In
conjunction with the results of cognitive
tests, focus groups, the 2003 National
Census Test, the 2004 Census Test, and
the 2005 National Census Test, the 2006
Census Test will help us develop the
optimal data collection methodology for
the 2010 Census.
There are two test sites for the 2006
Census Test—selected census tracts in
Travis County, Texas, and the Cheyenne
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
River American Indian Reservation and
Off-Reservation Trust Land in South
Dakota.
Affected Public: Individuals or
households; Business or other for-profit;
Not-for-profit institutions; State, local,
or Tribal government.
Frequency: One time.
Respondent’s Obligation: Mandatory.
Legal Authority: Title 13, U.S.C.,
Sections 141 and 193.
OMB Desk Officer: Susan Schechter,
(202) 395–5103.
Copies of the above information
collection proposal can be obtained by
calling or writing Diana Hynek,
Departmental Paperwork Clearance
Officer, (202) 482–0266, Department of
Commerce, room 6625, 14th and
Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington,
DC 20230 (or via the Internet at
dhynek@doc.gov).
Written comments and
recommendations for the proposed
information collection should be sent
within 30 days of publication of this
notice to Susan Schechter, OMB Desk
Officer either by fax (202–395–7245) or
e-mail (susan_schechter@omb.eop.gov).
Dated: August 19, 2005.
Madeleine Clayton,
Management Analyst, Office of the Chief
Information Officer.
[FR Doc. 05–16831 Filed 8–23–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–07–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–533–820]
Certain Hot–Rolled Carbon Steel Flat
Products from India: Notice of
Extension of Time Limit for Preliminary
Results of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review
AGENCY: Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
EFFECTIVE DATE: August 24, 2005.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Kavita Mohan or Jeff Pedersen, AD/CVD
Operations, Office 4, Import
Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230;
telephone: (202) 482–3542 or (202) 482–
2769, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On
January 31, 2005, the Department of
Commerce (the Department) published a
notice of initiation of administrative
review of the antidumping duty order
on certain hot–rolled carbon steel flat
products (HRS) from India covering
E:\FR\FM\24AUN1.SGM
24AUN1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 163 / Wednesday, August 24, 2005 / Notices
shipments of HRS by Essar Steel
Limited (Essar) to the United States for
the period from December 1, 2003,
through November 30, 2004. See
Initiation of Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Administrative
Reviews and Requests for Revocation in
Part, 70 FR 4818 (January 31, 2005). The
preliminary results are currently due no
later than September 2, 2005.
Extension of Time Limit for Preliminary
Results of Review
Section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Tariff Act
of 1930, as amended (the Act), requires
the Department to make a preliminary
determination within 245 days after the
last day of the anniversary month of the
date of publication of the order for
which a review is requested and a final
determination within 120 days after the
date on which the preliminary
determination is published. However, if
it is not practicable to complete the
review within this time period, section
751(a)(3)(A) of the Act allows the
Department to extend the time limit for
the preliminary determination to a
maximum of 365 days and the time
limit for the final determination to 180
days (or 300 days if the Department
does not extend the time limit for the
preliminary determination) from the
date of publication of the preliminary
determination.
The Department finds that it is not
practicable to complete the preliminary
results of this review within this time
limit because additional time is needed
to fully analyze significant amounts of
new data only recently submitted.
Therefore, in accordance with section
751(a)(3)(A) of the Act, the Department
is extending the time limit for
completion of the preliminary results of
this review until no later than January
3, 2006, which is the next business day
after 365 days from the last day of the
anniversary month of the date of
publication of the order. The deadline
for the final results of this
administrative review continues to be
120 days after the publication of the
preliminary results.
This notice is issued and published in
accordance with section 751(a)(3)(A) of
the Act.
Dated: August 18, 2005.
Barbara E. Tillman,
Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration.
[FR Doc. E5–4632 Filed 8–23–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S
VerDate jul<14>2003
15:23 Aug 23, 2005
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–351–840]
Notice of Preliminary Determination of
Sales at Less Than Fair Value,
Postponement of Final Determination,
and Affirmative Preliminary Critical
Circumstances Determination: Certain
Orange Juice from Brazil
AGENCY: Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: We preliminarily determine
that certain orange juice from Brazil is
being, or is likely to be, sold in the
United States at less than fair value, as
provided in section 733(b) of the Tariff
Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). In
addition, we preliminarily determine
that there is a reasonable basis to believe
or suspect that critical circumstances
exist with respect to the subject
merchandise exported from Brazil.
Interested parties are invited to
comment on this preliminary
determination. Because we are
postponing the final determination, we
will make our final determination not
later than 135 days after the date of
publication of this preliminary
determination in the Federal Register.
EFFECTIVE DATE: August 24, 2005.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Elizabeth Eastwood or Jill Pollack, AD/
CVD Operations, Office 2, Import
Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230;
telephone: (202) 482–3874 or (202) 482–
4593, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Preliminary Determination
We preliminarily determine that
certain orange juice from Brazil is being,
or is likely to be, sold in the United
States at less than fair value (LTFV), as
provided in section 733 of the Act. The
estimated margins of sales at LTFV are
shown in the ‘‘Suspension of
Liquidation’’ section of this notice. In
addition, we preliminarily determine
that there is a reasonable basis to believe
or suspect that critical circumstances
exist with respect to the subject
merchandise exported from Brazil. The
critical circumstances analysis for the
preliminary determination is discussed
below under the section ‘‘Critical
Circumstances.’’
Background
Since the initiation of this
investigation (see Notice of Initiation of
Jkt 205001
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
49557
Antidumping Duty Investigation:
Certain Orange Juice from Brazil, 70 FR
7233 (Feb. 11, 2005) (Initiation Notice)),
the following events have occurred.
On March 3, 2005, the United States
International Trade Commission (ITC)
preliminarily determined that there is a
reasonable indication that imports of
certain orange juice from Brazil are
materially injuring the United States
industry. See ITC Investigation No. 731–
TA–1089.
On March 7, 2005, we selected
Sucocitrico Cutrale, S.A. (Cutrale), the
largest producer/exporter of certain
orange juice from Brazil, as a mandatory
respondent in this proceeding and
issued Cutrale an antidumping
questionnaire.
On March 14, 2005, we also selected
the two next largest producers/exporters
of certain orange juice from Brazil (i.e.,
Fischer S/A - Agroindustria (Fischer)
and Montecitrus Industria e Comercio
Limitada (Montecitrus)) as mandatory
respondents in this proceeding. See the
March 14, 2005, memorandum to Louis
Apple, Director, Office 2, from Elizabeth
Eastwood, Jill Pollack, Nichole Zink,
and Ryan Douglas entitled,
‘‘Antidumping Duty Investigation of
Certain Orange Juice from Brazil Selection of Respondents.’’ We issued
antidumping questionnaires to these
exporters on March 14, 2005.
On March 31, 2005, the petitioners1
requested that the Department ‘‘clarify’’
the scope of the instant investigation to
include exports of FCOJM from
producers and exporters previously
covered by a separate antidumping duty
order on frozen concentrated orange
juice (FCOJ) from Brazil. From April 4
through April 14, 2005, we received
comments on the petitioners’ request
from various Brazilian orange juice
producers, as well as additional
comments from the petitioners.
On April 11, 2005, Cutrale requested
that the Department revise the period of
investigation (POI) in this proceeding.
We received section A questionnaire
responses from Cutrale and Fischer on
April 11, 2005. On April 15 and 18,
2005, respectively, the Department
issued supplemental section A
questionnaires to Fischer and Cutrale.
On April 19, 2005, we received a section
A questionnaire response from
Montecitrus.
On April 22, 2005, we rejected
Cutrale’s request to revise the POI. See
the April 22, 2005, memorandum to
Louis Apple, Director, Office 2, from Jill
1 The petitioners in this investigation are the
Florida Citrus Mutual, A. Duda & Sons, Inc. (doing
business as Citrus Belle), Citrus World, Inc., and
Southern Garden Citrus Processing Corporation
(doing business as Southern Gardens).
E:\FR\FM\24AUN1.SGM
24AUN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 163 (Wednesday, August 24, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 49556-49557]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E5-4632]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-533-820]
Certain Hot-Rolled Carbon Steel Flat Products from India: Notice
of Extension of Time Limit for Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review
AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
EFFECTIVE DATE: August 24, 2005.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kavita Mohan or Jeff Pedersen, AD/CVD
Operations, Office 4, Import Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and
Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-
3542 or (202) 482-2769, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On January 31, 2005, the Department of
Commerce (the Department) published a notice of initiation of
administrative review of the antidumping duty order on certain hot-
rolled carbon steel flat products (HRS) from India covering
[[Page 49557]]
shipments of HRS by Essar Steel Limited (Essar) to the United States
for the period from December 1, 2003, through November 30, 2004. See
Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Administrative
Reviews and Requests for Revocation in Part, 70 FR 4818 (January 31,
2005). The preliminary results are currently due no later than
September 2, 2005.
Extension of Time Limit for Preliminary Results of Review
Section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the
Act), requires the Department to make a preliminary determination
within 245 days after the last day of the anniversary month of the date
of publication of the order for which a review is requested and a final
determination within 120 days after the date on which the preliminary
determination is published. However, if it is not practicable to
complete the review within this time period, section 751(a)(3)(A) of
the Act allows the Department to extend the time limit for the
preliminary determination to a maximum of 365 days and the time limit
for the final determination to 180 days (or 300 days if the Department
does not extend the time limit for the preliminary determination) from
the date of publication of the preliminary determination.
The Department finds that it is not practicable to complete the
preliminary results of this review within this time limit because
additional time is needed to fully analyze significant amounts of new
data only recently submitted. Therefore, in accordance with section
751(a)(3)(A) of the Act, the Department is extending the time limit for
completion of the preliminary results of this review until no later
than January 3, 2006, which is the next business day after 365 days
from the last day of the anniversary month of the date of publication
of the order. The deadline for the final results of this administrative
review continues to be 120 days after the publication of the
preliminary results.
This notice is issued and published in accordance with section
751(a)(3)(A) of the Act.
Dated: August 18, 2005.
Barbara E. Tillman,
Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import Administration.
[FR Doc. E5-4632 Filed 8-23-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-S
