Self-Regulatory Organizations; New York Stock Exchange, Inc., Notice of Filing of Proposed Rule Change and Amendments No. 1 and 2 Thereto Relating to Proposed Changes to Exchange Rule 342 (“Offices-Approval, Supervision and Control”), 48997-49000 [E5-4547]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 161 / Monday, August 22, 2005 / Notices
Program for an additional six month
period.
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that its
proposal is consistent with section 6(b)
of the Act 8 in general, and furthers the
objective of section 6(b)(5) of the Act 9
in particular, in that it is designed to
promote just and equitable principles of
trade and to protect investors and the
public interest.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
The proposed rule change does not
impose any burden on competition.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants, or Others
The Exchange has not solicited, and
does not intend to solicit, comments on
this proposed rule change. The
Exchange has not received any
unsolicited written comments from
members or other interested parties.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
Because the forgoing rule change does
not: (1) Significantly affect the
protection of investors or the public
interest; (2) impose any significant
burden on competition; and (3) become
operative for 30 days after the date of
this filing, or such shorter time as the
Commission may designate, it has
become effective pursuant to section
19(b)(3)(A) of the Act 10 and Rule 19b–
4(f)(6) thereunder.11
A proposed rule change filed under
19b–4(f)(6) normally may not become
operative prior to 30 days after the date
of filing.12 However, Rule 19b–
4(f)(6)(iii) 13 permits the Commission to
designate a shorter time if such action
is consistent with the protection of
investors and the public interest. The
Exchange has requested that the
Commission waive the five-day prefiling notice requirement and the 30-day
pre-operative delay. The Commission is
exercising its authority to waive the
five-day pre-filing requirement and
believes that waiver of the 30-day preoperative delay is consistent with the
protection of investors and in the public
interest. Waiving the five-day pre-filing
requirement and 30-day pre-operative
8 15
U.S.C. 78f(b).
U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
10 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
11 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6).
12 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6)(iii).
13 Id.
9 15
VerDate jul<14>2003
16:09 Aug 19, 2005
delay will allow the Pilot Program to
continue uninterrupted.14
At any time within 60 days of the
filing of the proposed rule change, the
Commission may summarily abrogate
such rule change if it appears to the
Commission that such action is
necessary or appropriate in the public
interest, for the protection of investors,
or otherwise in furtherance of the Act.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s Internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an e-mail to rulecomments@sec.gov. Please include File
No. SR–ISE–2005–39 on the subject
line.
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Jonathan G. Katz, Secretary,
Securities and Exchange Commission,
Station Place, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549–9303.
All submissions should refer to File
No. SR–ISE–2005–39. This file number
should be included on the subject line
if e-mail is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for inspection and copying in
the Commission’s Public Reference
Room, 100 F Street, NE., Washington,
DC 20549. Copies of such filing will also
be available for inspection and copying
at the principal office of the ISE. All
comments received will be posted
without change; the Commission does
14 For the purposes only of waiving the operative
date of this proposal, the Commission has
considered the proposed rule’s impact on
efficiency, competition, and capital formation. 15
U.S.C. 78c(f).
Jkt 205001
PO 00000
Frm 00066
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
48997
not edit personal identifying
information from submissions. You
should submit only information that
you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File No.
SR–ISE–2005–39 and should be
submitted on or before September 12,
2005.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Market Regulation, pursuant to delegated
authority.15
Margaret H. McFarland,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. E5–4550 Filed 8–19–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–52259; File No. SR–NYSE–
2004–64]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; New
York Stock Exchange, Inc., Notice of
Filing of Proposed Rule Change and
Amendments No. 1 and 2 Thereto
Relating to Proposed Changes to
Exchange Rule 342 (‘‘Offices—
Approval, Supervision and Control’’)
August 15, 2005.
Pursuant to section 19(b)(1) 1 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Exchange Act’’ or ‘‘Act’’),2 and Rule
19b–4 thereunder,3 notice is hereby
given that on November 2, 2004, the
New York Stock Exchange, Inc.
(‘‘NYSE’’ or ‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission
(‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule
change as described in items I, II and III
below, which items have been prepared
by the NYSE. On July 11, 2005, the
NYSE filed Amendment No. 1 to the
proposed rule change (‘‘Amendment No.
1’’).4 On August 12, 2005, the NYSE
filed Amendment No. 2 to the proposed
rule change (‘‘Amendment No. 2’’).5 The
Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule
15 17
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 15 U.S.C. 78a.
3 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
4 In Amendment No. 1, which supplemented the
original filing, the Exchange added its proposed
Interpretive Handbook Interpretations 342.30(d)/01
and 342.30(e)/01 for purposes of clarifying issues
related to the designation of a Chief Compliance
Officer and the Annual Certification, respectively.
The text of interpretations 342.30(d)/01 and
342.30(e)/01 is available on the NYSE’s Web site
(https://www.NYSE.com), at the NYSE’s principal
office, and at the Commission’s Public Reference
Room.
5 In Amendment No. 2, which supplemented the
original filing, the Exchange modified interpretation
342.30(e)/01 in order to clarify the obligations of
member organizations in the preparation of annual
certifications.
1 15
E:\FR\FM\22AUN1.SGM
22AUN1
48998
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 161 / Monday, August 22, 2005 / Notices
change, as amended, from interested
persons.
Members are required only to prepare
the report.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
b. Provisions of the Proposed Rule
Change
The proposed rule change makes the
following changes relating to the
Annual Reports:
• The Annual Reports must be filed
with the Exchange by April 1 of each
year.
• The anti-money laundering
compliance programs required by
Exchange Rule 445 6 have been added to
the list of specific areas of compliance
that must be discussed in the Annual
Reports.
• Member Organizations must
designate a principal officer or general
partner as CCO.7
• Each Member, and the CEO (or
equivalent) of each Member
Organization, must submit a
certification attesting to the adequacy of
their organization’s compliance policies
and procedures.8
The proposed amendment to NYSE
Rule 342.30 (‘‘Annual Reports’’) would:
require each member organization
(‘‘Member Organization’’) and each
member not associated with a member
organization (‘‘Member’’) to file with the
Exchange the annual reports (‘‘Annual
Reports’’) it is currently required to
prepare, and in the case of a Member
Organization, to submit to its Chief
Executive Officer (‘‘CEO’’); add to the
Annual Reports a required discussion of
compliance efforts regarding anti-money
laundering; require each Member
Organization to designate a principal
officer or general partner as Chief
Compliance Officer (‘‘CCO’’); and
require each Member and the CEO of
each Member Organization to file a
yearly statement confirming the
adequacy of their compliance processes
and procedures. The text of the
proposed rule change is available on the
NYSE’s Web site (https://
www.NYSE.com), at the NYSE’s
principal office, and at the
Commission’s Public Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
NYSE included statements concerning
the purpose of and basis for the
proposed rule changes. The text of these
statements, as amended, may be
examined at the places specified in item
IV below. The NYSE has prepared
summaries, set forth in sections A, B
and C below, of the most significant
aspects of such statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
1. Purpose
a. Background
16:09 Aug 19, 2005
(i) Submission of Annual Reports to the
Exchange
Filing the Annual Reports with the
Exchange will provide timely
information about the compliance
efforts of Members and Member
Organizations, thereby strengthening
and making more efficient the
Exchange’s regulatory oversight, and
facilitating the required annual
certifications (see below).
Because submission of the Annual
Reports to the Exchange was previously
not required, the reports were typically
provided to the Exchange at the time of,
or in connection with, examinations of
Member Organizations and Members.9
Consequently, the Exchange did not
always receive important information in
a timely, efficient manner. Providing the
reports to Exchange staff at annual
intervals will afford the Exchange a
timely picture of the Members’ and
Member Organizations’ compliance
issues from the preceding year, a tool for
planning surveillance and
(ii) Addition of Anti-Money Laundering
Discussion to Annual Report
The USA Patriot Act 10 substantially
expanded federal anti-money
laundering regulations, and led to the
enhancement of Exchange anti-money
laundering requirements through the
adoption of NYSE Rule 445 in April
2002. The Exchange considers antimoney laundering compliance programs
to be important enough to warrant
consideration and discussion in the
Annual Reports, and so the proposed
rule change adds these programs to the
list of specific areas of compliance that
must be discussed in the Annual
Reports.
The addition of anti-money
laundering compliance programs to the
aforementioned list continues the
Exchange’s practice of incrementally
supplementing the list to reflect changes
in the evolving regulatory environment.
A similar augmentation recently
occurred through NYSE Rule 342.23,
which added Members’ and Member
Organizations’ internal controls to the
Annual Report’s list of required
compliance discussions.11
(iii) Designation of CCO
The Exchange strongly believes that
Member Organizations’ compliance
with Federal laws and Exchange
regulations should be of the utmost
priority. In furtherance of that belief, the
Exchange previously addressed the
critically important role of the
compliance function by requiring the
Series 14 (NYSE Compliance Official)
examination and registration, which are
intended to ensure the qualifications of
key compliance professionals.12
In further recognition of the
increasing importance of the
compliance function, the proposed rule
change requires each Member
Organization to formally designate a
principal executive officer or general
10 Pub.
NYSE Rule 342 requires supervision
of the offices, departments and business
activities of Members and Member
Organizations. NYSE Rule 342.30,
which was adopted on May 27, 1988,
requires Members and Member
Organizations to prepare an Annual
Report addressing specified compliance
issues by April 1 of each year.
Currently, Member Organizations are
required to submit this report only to
their CEO or managing partner and
VerDate jul<14>2003
c. Regulatory Purpose of Proposed Rule
Change’s Provisions
examinations, and more comprehensive
information for evaluation of
compliance systems and programs and
identification of potential regulatory
problems.
Jkt 205001
Rule 445 requires Members and Member
Organizations to develop and implement written
anti-money laundering programs consistent with
the Bank Secrecy Act (31 U.S.C. 5311, et seq. and
Treasury Regulation 31 CFR 103.120).
7 The SEC recently approved a similar
requirement in NASD’s new Rule 3013. Securities
Exchange Act Release No. 50347 (September 10,
2004), 69 FR 56107 (September 17, 2004) (SR–
NASD–2003–176).
8 The SEC recently approved a similar
requirement in NASD’s new Rule 3013. See id.
9 Some Member Organizations already submit the
Annual Reports to the Exchange and/or make them
available to Exchange examiners.
PO 00000
6 NYSE
Frm 00067
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
L. 107–56, 115 Stat. 272 (2001).
Securities Exchange Act Release No. 49882
(June 17, 2004), 69 FR 35108 (June 23, 2004) SR–
NYSE–2002–36).
12 The Series 14 Examination is a qualification
examination intended to ensure that the individuals
designated as having day-to-day compliance
responsibilities for their respective firms, or who
supervise ten or more people engaged in
compliance activities, have the knowledge
necessary to carry out their job responsibilities.
NYSE Rule 342.13(b) requires Members’ and
Member Organizations’ compliance supervisors to
pass the Series 14 Examination. See Securities
Exchange Act Release No. 25763 (May 27, 1988), 53
FR 20925 (June 7, 1988).
11 See
E:\FR\FM\22AUN1.SGM
22AUN1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 161 / Monday, August 22, 2005 / Notices
partner of the Member Organization as
its CCO. This requirement is consistent
with NYSE Rule 311(b)(5), which
mandates that ‘‘principal executive
officers’’ exercise responsibility over
each of the prescribed business areas of
a Member Organization (e.g.,
compliance). Currently, each principal
executive officer and general partner is
generally required to pass an
examination acceptable to the Exchange
that pertains to knowledge of his or her
functional responsibility.13 Based on the
type of business that individual
conducts, and the structure of his or her
organization, acceptable examinations
include the Series 9/10 (General
Securities Sales Supervisor), Series 14,
Series 24 (General Securities Principal),
Series 27 (Financial and Operations
Principal), or Series 28 (Introducing
Broker/Dealer Financial and Operations
Principal).14
The CCO designation requirement
does not apply to Members, because
such members, whose activities are
limited to interaction with other
members on the Floor of the Exchange,
generally lack the organizational
infrastructure or scope of business
activities that would necessitate
designation of a CCO.15
(iv) CEO Certification
The proposed rule change’s CEO
certification requirement reflects the
Exchange’s belief that Member
Organizations’ senior executives,
particularly CEOs, should focus the
highest degree of attention and
resources on the compliance function.
While subordinates with supervisory
responsibility for specific business lines
remain accountable for the discharge of
compliance policies and written
supervisory procedures, the Exchange
considers CEOs ultimately to be
accountable for the compliance and
supervision of their Member
Organizations.16 In keeping with those
13 See
NYSE Interpretation Handbook, Rule
304A(a), (c)/01.
14 In interpretations 342.30(d)/01 and 342.30(e)/
01, the Exchange also proposes guidance regarding:
the designation of CCOs; the interaction between
CCOs and other executives during preparation of
Annual Reports; the scope and subjects of the
Annual Reports; and the reporting and certification
process. The text of interpretations 342.30(d)/01
and 342.30(e)/01 is available on the NYSE’s Web
site (https://www.NYSE.com), at the NYSE’s
principal office, and at the Commission’s Public
Reference Room.
15 This exemption is consistent with other
provisions of NYSE Rule 342. For example, under
certain circumstances, some compliance officials at
Member Organizations are exempt from the Series
14 requirement. See NYSE Interpretation
Handbook, Rule 342(a)(b)/02.
16 Attestations similar to the yearly CEO
certification requirement proposed herein are also
required by Exchange Rule 351(f), which calls for
VerDate jul<14>2003
16:09 Aug 19, 2005
Jkt 205001
principles, the CEO certification
requirement is intended to promote and
expand dialogue between Member
Organization CEOs and their officers
who are responsible for compliance
with Federal laws and Exchange
regulations.17
The required annual certification
consists of four elements:
(i) Each Member or each Member
Organization’s CEO (or equivalent
officer) must certify that processes are in
place to: establish and maintain policies
and procedures designed to achieve
compliance with Exchange rules and
applicable federal securities laws and
regulations; modify such policies and
procedures as business, regulatory and
legislative changes dictate; and test the
effectiveness of such policies and
procedures on a periodic basis. This
requirement goes to the essential nature
of compliance, and assures an
appropriately heightened attention to its
details.
(ii) Each Member Organization’s CEO
(or equivalent officer) must certify that
he or she has conducted one or more
meetings with the CCO during the
preceding 12 months, during which
they discussed and reviewed the matters
described in the certification. Such
meetings, which must entail discussion
and review of the Member
Organization’s compliance efforts as of
that date, should aid in the
identification and resolution of
significant ongoing and future
compliance problems.
(iii) Each Member Organization’s CEO
(or equivalent officer) must certify that
his or her Member Organization’s
compliance processes are evidenced in
a written report that was reviewed by
the Member Organization’s CEO, CCO,
and such other officers as the Member
Organization deems necessary, and
submitted to the Member Organization’s
board of directors and audit committee,
if any. The report must be produced
prior to the execution of the proposed
certification, must describe the manner
in which the compliance processes are
administered, and must identity the
annual confirmation of compliance with Exchange
Rule 472 (‘‘Communications with the Public’’). See
Securities Exchange Act Release No. 45908 (May
10, 2002), 67 FR 34968 (May 16, 2002) (SR–NYSE–
2002–09).
17 The proposed rule change’s CEO certification
requirement corresponds in substance to NASD
Rule 3013, which the SEC favorably described as
seeking ‘‘to provide a mechanism to compel
substantial and purposeful interaction between
senior management and compliance personnel to
enhance the quality of members’ supervisory and
compliance systems.’’ Securities Exchange Act
Release No. 50347 (September 10, 2004), 69 FR
56107 (September 17, 2004) (SR–NASD–2003–176).
PO 00000
Frm 00068
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
48999
officers and supervisors who are
responsible for its administration.18
(iv) Each Member Organization’s CEO
(or equivalent officer) must certify that
he or she has consulted with the CCO,
such other officers of the Member
Organization as the Member
Organization deems necessary, and, to
the extent the Member Organization’s
CEO (or equivalent officer), CCO and
such other officers deem appropriate in
order to attest to the statements in the
certification, outside consultants,
lawyers and accountants. This
requirement recognizes that the CCO’s
expertise in the matters underlying the
certification make his or her role in the
process critical, and make the CCO an
indispensable party to the CEO’s
certification.
The sentence ‘‘[I]f any of these areas
do not apply to the member or member
organization, the report should so
state,’’ which currently concludes Rule
342.30, has been repositioned in the
amended rule text to avoid the
ambiguity that otherwise would have
resulted from the addition of Rules
342.30(d) and 342.30(e).
2. Statutory Basis
The NYSE believes that the proposed
rule change is consistent with section
6(b) 19 of the Act in general and section
6(b)(5) of the Act 20 which requires that
the rules of the Exchange be designed to
prevent fraudulent and manipulative
acts and practices, to promote just and
equitable principles of trade and, in
general, to protect investors and the
public interest in that it facilitates the
Exchange’s review of the Membership’s
regulatory programs, strengthens
Member Organizations’ oversight of
their compliance processes and
procedures, and promotes increased
involvement of Member Organization
CEOs in their firms’ compliance matters.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
The NYSE does not believe that the
proposed rule change will impose any
burden on competition that is not
necessary or appropriate in furtherance
of the purposes of the Act.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants or Others
The NYSE has not solicited but has
received written comments on the
proposed rule change.
18 See
interpretation 342.30(e)/01.
U.S.C. 78f(b)
20 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5)
19 15
E:\FR\FM\22AUN1.SGM
22AUN1
49000
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 161 / Monday, August 22, 2005 / Notices
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
Within 35 days of the date of
publication of this notice in the Federal
Register or within such longer period (i)
as the Commission may designate up to
90 days of such date if it finds such
longer period to be appropriate and
publishes its reasons for so finding or
(ii) as to which the self-regulatory
organization consents, the Commission
will:
(A) By order approve the proposed
rule change, or
(B) Institute proceedings to determine
whether the proposed rule change
should be disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change, as amended, is consistent with
the Act. Comments may be submitted by
any of the following methods:
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s Internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send e-mail to rulecomments@sec.gov. Please include File
Number SR–NYSE–2004–64 on the
subject line.
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Jonathan G. Katz, Secretary,
Securities and Exchange Commission,
100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC
20549–9303.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–NYSE–2004–64. This file
number should be included on the
subject line if e-mail is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro/shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for inspection and copying in
the Commission’s Public Reference
Room. Copies of such filing also will be
available for inspection and copying at
the principal office of the NYSE. All
VerDate jul<14>2003
16:09 Aug 19, 2005
Jkt 205001
comments received will be posted
without change; the Commission does
not edit personal identifying
information from submissions. You
should submit only information that
you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File
Number SR–NYSE–2004–64 and should
be submitted on or before September 12,
2005.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
For the Commission, by the Division of
Market Regulation, pursuant to delegated
authority.21
Margaret H. McFarland,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. E5–4547 Filed 8–19–05; 8:45 am]
Rules PCX Equities, Inc.
BILLING CODE 8010–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–52243; File No. SR–PCX–
2005–91]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Pacific
Exchange, Inc; Notice of Filing and
Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed
Rule Change and Amendment No. 1
Thereto Relating to the Continuing
Education Regulatory Element
Requirement
August 11, 2005.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on July 29,
2005, the Pacific Exchange, Inc. (‘‘PCX’’
or ‘‘Exchange’’) through its wholly its
wholly owned subsidiary PCX Equities,
Inc. (‘‘PCX’’) filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission
(‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule
change as described in Items I, II and III
below, which Items have been prepared
by the Exchange. On August 9, 2005, the
Exchange filed Amendment No. 1 to the
proposed rule change.3 The PCX has
filed the proposal as a ‘‘noncontroversial’’ rule change pursuant to
Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act 4 and Rule
19b–4(f)(6) thereunder,5 which renders
the proposal effective upon filing with
the Commission. The Commission is
publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change,
as amended, from interested persons.
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12)
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
3 In Amendment No. 1, the Exchange made minor
edits to PCX Rule 9.27(c).
4 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
5 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6).
PO 00000
21 17
1 15
Frm 00069
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
The PCX proposes to amend PCXE
Rule 9.27 to eliminate the
‘‘Grandfather’’ exemption to the
regulatory element of the Continuing
Education (‘‘CE’’) Program. Below is the
text of the proposed rule change.
Proposed new language is in italics.
Rule 9
Rule 9.27(a)–(b)—No Change.
Rule 9.27(c)—No ETP Holder shall
permit any registered person to continue
to, and no registered person shall
continue to, perform duties as a
registered person, unless such person
has complied with the continuing
education requirements of this Rule
9.27(c).
Each registered person shall complete
the Regulatory Element of the
continuing education program
beginning with the occurrence of their
second registration anniversary date,
and every three years thereafter, [on
three occasions, after the occurrence of
their second, fifth and tenth registration
anniversary dates,] or as otherwise
prescribed by the Corporation. On each
[of these three] occasion[s], the
Regulatory Element must be completed
within one hundred twenty days after
the person’s registration anniversary
date. A person’s initial registration date,
also known as the ‘‘base date’’, shall
establish the cycle anniversary dates for
purposes of this Rule. The content of the
Regulatory Element of the program shall
be [prescribed] determined by the
Corporation for each registration
category of persons subject to the Rule.
(1) Reserved. [Registered person who
have been continuously registered for
more than ten years as of the effective
date of this Rule shall be exempt from
participation in the Regulatory Element
of the continuing education program,
provided such persons have not been
subject to any disciplinary action within
the last ten (10) years as enumerated in
subsection (c)(3)(A)–(B) of this Rule.
Persons who have been currently
registered for ten (10) years or less as of
the effective date of this Rule shall
initially participate in the Regulatory
Element of the continuing education
program within one hundred twenty
days (120) after the occurrence of the
second, fifth or tenth registration
anniversary date, whichever anniversary
date first applies, and on the applicable
registered anniversary date(s) thereafter.
Such persons will have satisfied the
requirements of the Regulatory Element
E:\FR\FM\22AUN1.SGM
22AUN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 161 (Monday, August 22, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 48997-49000]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E5-4547]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-52259; File No. SR-NYSE-2004-64]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; New York Stock Exchange, Inc.,
Notice of Filing of Proposed Rule Change and Amendments No. 1 and 2
Thereto Relating to Proposed Changes to Exchange Rule 342 (``Offices--
Approval, Supervision and Control'')
August 15, 2005.
Pursuant to section 19(b)(1) \1\ of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 (``Exchange Act'' or ``Act''),\2\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\3\
notice is hereby given that on November 2, 2004, the New York Stock
Exchange, Inc. (``NYSE'' or ``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (``Commission'') the proposed rule change as
described in items I, II and III below, which items have been prepared
by the NYSE. On July 11, 2005, the NYSE filed Amendment No. 1 to the
proposed rule change (``Amendment No. 1'').\4\ On August 12, 2005, the
NYSE filed Amendment No. 2 to the proposed rule change (``Amendment No.
2'').\5\ The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments
on the proposed rule
[[Page 48998]]
change, as amended, from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 15 U.S.C. 78a.
\3\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
\4\ In Amendment No. 1, which supplemented the original filing,
the Exchange added its proposed Interpretive Handbook
Interpretations 342.30(d)/01 and 342.30(e)/01 for purposes of
clarifying issues related to the designation of a Chief Compliance
Officer and the Annual Certification, respectively. The text of
interpretations 342.30(d)/01 and 342.30(e)/01 is available on the
NYSE's Web site (https://www.NYSE.com), at the NYSE's principal
office, and at the Commission's Public Reference Room.
\5\ In Amendment No. 2, which supplemented the original filing,
the Exchange modified interpretation 342.30(e)/01 in order to
clarify the obligations of member organizations in the preparation
of annual certifications.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
The proposed amendment to NYSE Rule 342.30 (``Annual Reports'')
would: require each member organization (``Member Organization'') and
each member not associated with a member organization (``Member'') to
file with the Exchange the annual reports (``Annual Reports'') it is
currently required to prepare, and in the case of a Member
Organization, to submit to its Chief Executive Officer (``CEO''); add
to the Annual Reports a required discussion of compliance efforts
regarding anti-money laundering; require each Member Organization to
designate a principal officer or general partner as Chief Compliance
Officer (``CCO''); and require each Member and the CEO of each Member
Organization to file a yearly statement confirming the adequacy of
their compliance processes and procedures. The text of the proposed
rule change is available on the NYSE's Web site (https://www.NYSE.com),
at the NYSE's principal office, and at the Commission's Public
Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the NYSE included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule changes. The
text of these statements, as amended, may be examined at the places
specified in item IV below. The NYSE has prepared summaries, set forth
in sections A, B and C below, of the most significant aspects of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
1. Purpose
a. Background
NYSE Rule 342 requires supervision of the offices, departments and
business activities of Members and Member Organizations. NYSE Rule
342.30, which was adopted on May 27, 1988, requires Members and Member
Organizations to prepare an Annual Report addressing specified
compliance issues by April 1 of each year. Currently, Member
Organizations are required to submit this report only to their CEO or
managing partner and Members are required only to prepare the report.
b. Provisions of the Proposed Rule Change
The proposed rule change makes the following changes relating to
the Annual Reports:
The Annual Reports must be filed with the Exchange by
April 1 of each year.
The anti-money laundering compliance programs required by
Exchange Rule 445 \6\ have been added to the list of specific areas of
compliance that must be discussed in the Annual Reports.
Member Organizations must designate a principal officer or
general partner as CCO.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ NYSE Rule 445 requires Members and Member Organizations to
develop and implement written anti-money laundering programs
consistent with the Bank Secrecy Act (31 U.S.C. 5311, et seq. and
Treasury Regulation 31 CFR 103.120).
\7\ The SEC recently approved a similar requirement in NASD's
new Rule 3013. Securities Exchange Act Release No. 50347 (September
10, 2004), 69 FR 56107 (September 17, 2004) (SR-NASD-2003-176).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Each Member, and the CEO (or equivalent) of each Member
Organization, must submit a certification attesting to the adequacy of
their organization's compliance policies and procedures.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ The SEC recently approved a similar requirement in NASD's
new Rule 3013. See id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
c. Regulatory Purpose of Proposed Rule Change's Provisions
(i) Submission of Annual Reports to the Exchange
Filing the Annual Reports with the Exchange will provide timely
information about the compliance efforts of Members and Member
Organizations, thereby strengthening and making more efficient the
Exchange's regulatory oversight, and facilitating the required annual
certifications (see below).
Because submission of the Annual Reports to the Exchange was
previously not required, the reports were typically provided to the
Exchange at the time of, or in connection with, examinations of Member
Organizations and Members.\9\ Consequently, the Exchange did not always
receive important information in a timely, efficient manner. Providing
the reports to Exchange staff at annual intervals will afford the
Exchange a timely picture of the Members' and Member Organizations'
compliance issues from the preceding year, a tool for planning
surveillance and examinations, and more comprehensive information for
evaluation of compliance systems and programs and identification of
potential regulatory problems.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ Some Member Organizations already submit the Annual Reports
to the Exchange and/or make them available to Exchange examiners.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
(ii) Addition of Anti-Money Laundering Discussion to Annual Report
The USA Patriot Act \10\ substantially expanded federal anti-money
laundering regulations, and led to the enhancement of Exchange anti-
money laundering requirements through the adoption of NYSE Rule 445 in
April 2002. The Exchange considers anti-money laundering compliance
programs to be important enough to warrant consideration and discussion
in the Annual Reports, and so the proposed rule change adds these
programs to the list of specific areas of compliance that must be
discussed in the Annual Reports.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ Pub. L. 107-56, 115 Stat. 272 (2001).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The addition of anti-money laundering compliance programs to the
aforementioned list continues the Exchange's practice of incrementally
supplementing the list to reflect changes in the evolving regulatory
environment. A similar augmentation recently occurred through NYSE Rule
342.23, which added Members' and Member Organizations' internal
controls to the Annual Report's list of required compliance
discussions.\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 49882 (June 17,
2004), 69 FR 35108 (June 23, 2004) SR-NYSE-2002-36).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
(iii) Designation of CCO
The Exchange strongly believes that Member Organizations'
compliance with Federal laws and Exchange regulations should be of the
utmost priority. In furtherance of that belief, the Exchange previously
addressed the critically important role of the compliance function by
requiring the Series 14 (NYSE Compliance Official) examination and
registration, which are intended to ensure the qualifications of key
compliance professionals.\12\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ The Series 14 Examination is a qualification examination
intended to ensure that the individuals designated as having day-to-
day compliance responsibilities for their respective firms, or who
supervise ten or more people engaged in compliance activities, have
the knowledge necessary to carry out their job responsibilities.
NYSE Rule 342.13(b) requires Members' and Member Organizations'
compliance supervisors to pass the Series 14 Examination. See
Securities Exchange Act Release No. 25763 (May 27, 1988), 53 FR
20925 (June 7, 1988).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In further recognition of the increasing importance of the
compliance function, the proposed rule change requires each Member
Organization to formally designate a principal executive officer or
general
[[Page 48999]]
partner of the Member Organization as its CCO. This requirement is
consistent with NYSE Rule 311(b)(5), which mandates that ``principal
executive officers'' exercise responsibility over each of the
prescribed business areas of a Member Organization (e.g., compliance).
Currently, each principal executive officer and general partner is
generally required to pass an examination acceptable to the Exchange
that pertains to knowledge of his or her functional responsibility.\13\
Based on the type of business that individual conducts, and the
structure of his or her organization, acceptable examinations include
the Series 9/10 (General Securities Sales Supervisor), Series 14,
Series 24 (General Securities Principal), Series 27 (Financial and
Operations Principal), or Series 28 (Introducing Broker/Dealer
Financial and Operations Principal).\14\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\13\ See NYSE Interpretation Handbook, Rule 304A(a), (c)/01.
\14\ In interpretations 342.30(d)/01 and 342.30(e)/01, the
Exchange also proposes guidance regarding: the designation of CCOs;
the interaction between CCOs and other executives during preparation
of Annual Reports; the scope and subjects of the Annual Reports; and
the reporting and certification process. The text of interpretations
342.30(d)/01 and 342.30(e)/01 is available on the NYSE's Web site
(https://www.NYSE.com), at the NYSE's principal office, and at the
Commission's Public Reference Room.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The CCO designation requirement does not apply to Members, because
such members, whose activities are limited to interaction with other
members on the Floor of the Exchange, generally lack the organizational
infrastructure or scope of business activities that would necessitate
designation of a CCO.\15\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\15\ This exemption is consistent with other provisions of NYSE
Rule 342. For example, under certain circumstances, some compliance
officials at Member Organizations are exempt from the Series 14
requirement. See NYSE Interpretation Handbook, Rule 342(a)(b)/02.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
(iv) CEO Certification
The proposed rule change's CEO certification requirement reflects
the Exchange's belief that Member Organizations' senior executives,
particularly CEOs, should focus the highest degree of attention and
resources on the compliance function. While subordinates with
supervisory responsibility for specific business lines remain
accountable for the discharge of compliance policies and written
supervisory procedures, the Exchange considers CEOs ultimately to be
accountable for the compliance and supervision of their Member
Organizations.\16\ In keeping with those principles, the CEO
certification requirement is intended to promote and expand dialogue
between Member Organization CEOs and their officers who are responsible
for compliance with Federal laws and Exchange regulations.\17\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\16\ Attestations similar to the yearly CEO certification
requirement proposed herein are also required by Exchange Rule
351(f), which calls for annual confirmation of compliance with
Exchange Rule 472 (``Communications with the Public''). See
Securities Exchange Act Release No. 45908 (May 10, 2002), 67 FR
34968 (May 16, 2002) (SR-NYSE-2002-09).
\17\ The proposed rule change's CEO certification requirement
corresponds in substance to NASD Rule 3013, which the SEC favorably
described as seeking ``to provide a mechanism to compel substantial
and purposeful interaction between senior management and compliance
personnel to enhance the quality of members' supervisory and
compliance systems.'' Securities Exchange Act Release No. 50347
(September 10, 2004), 69 FR 56107 (September 17, 2004) (SR-NASD-
2003-176).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The required annual certification consists of four elements:
(i) Each Member or each Member Organization's CEO (or equivalent
officer) must certify that processes are in place to: establish and
maintain policies and procedures designed to achieve compliance with
Exchange rules and applicable federal securities laws and regulations;
modify such policies and procedures as business, regulatory and
legislative changes dictate; and test the effectiveness of such
policies and procedures on a periodic basis. This requirement goes to
the essential nature of compliance, and assures an appropriately
heightened attention to its details.
(ii) Each Member Organization's CEO (or equivalent officer) must
certify that he or she has conducted one or more meetings with the CCO
during the preceding 12 months, during which they discussed and
reviewed the matters described in the certification. Such meetings,
which must entail discussion and review of the Member Organization's
compliance efforts as of that date, should aid in the identification
and resolution of significant ongoing and future compliance problems.
(iii) Each Member Organization's CEO (or equivalent officer) must
certify that his or her Member Organization's compliance processes are
evidenced in a written report that was reviewed by the Member
Organization's CEO, CCO, and such other officers as the Member
Organization deems necessary, and submitted to the Member
Organization's board of directors and audit committee, if any. The
report must be produced prior to the execution of the proposed
certification, must describe the manner in which the compliance
processes are administered, and must identity the officers and
supervisors who are responsible for its administration.\18\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\18\ See interpretation 342.30(e)/01.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
(iv) Each Member Organization's CEO (or equivalent officer) must
certify that he or she has consulted with the CCO, such other officers
of the Member Organization as the Member Organization deems necessary,
and, to the extent the Member Organization's CEO (or equivalent
officer), CCO and such other officers deem appropriate in order to
attest to the statements in the certification, outside consultants,
lawyers and accountants. This requirement recognizes that the CCO's
expertise in the matters underlying the certification make his or her
role in the process critical, and make the CCO an indispensable party
to the CEO's certification.
The sentence ``[I]f any of these areas do not apply to the member
or member organization, the report should so state,'' which currently
concludes Rule 342.30, has been repositioned in the amended rule text
to avoid the ambiguity that otherwise would have resulted from the
addition of Rules 342.30(d) and 342.30(e).
2. Statutory Basis
The NYSE believes that the proposed rule change is consistent with
section 6(b) \19\ of the Act in general and section 6(b)(5) of the Act
\20\ which requires that the rules of the Exchange be designed to
prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices, to promote just
and equitable principles of trade and, in general, to protect investors
and the public interest in that it facilitates the Exchange's review of
the Membership's regulatory programs, strengthens Member Organizations'
oversight of their compliance processes and procedures, and promotes
increased involvement of Member Organization CEOs in their firms'
compliance matters.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\19\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)
\20\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
The NYSE does not believe that the proposed rule change will impose
any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants or Others
The NYSE has not solicited but has received written comments on the
proposed rule change.
[[Page 49000]]
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
Within 35 days of the date of publication of this notice in the
Federal Register or within such longer period (i) as the Commission may
designate up to 90 days of such date if it finds such longer period to
be appropriate and publishes its reasons for so finding or (ii) as to
which the self-regulatory organization consents, the Commission will:
(A) By order approve the proposed rule change, or
(B) Institute proceedings to determine whether the proposed rule
change should be disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change, as amended, is consistent with the Act. Comments may be
submitted by any of the following methods:
Electronic Comments
Use the Commission's Internet comment form (https://
www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
Send e-mail to rule-comments@sec.gov. Please include File
Number SR-NYSE-2004-64 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
Send paper comments in triplicate to Jonathan G. Katz,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-9303.
All submissions should refer to File Number SR-NYSE-2004-64. This
file number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used.
To help the Commission process and review your comments more
efficiently, please use only one method. The Commission will post all
comments on the Commission's Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro/shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments,
all written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that
are filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating
to the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person,
other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance
with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for inspection
and copying in the Commission's Public Reference Room. Copies of such
filing also will be available for inspection and copying at the
principal office of the NYSE. All comments received will be posted
without change; the Commission does not edit personal identifying
information from submissions. You should submit only information that
you wish to make available publicly. All submissions should refer to
File Number SR-NYSE-2004-64 and should be submitted on or before
September 12, 2005.
For the Commission, by the Division of Market Regulation,
pursuant to delegated authority.\21\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\21\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Margaret H. McFarland,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. E5-4547 Filed 8-19-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-P