Conditions of Competition for Certain Oranges and Lemons in the U.S. Fresh Market, 48588 [05-16341]

Download as PDF 48588 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 159 / Thursday, August 18, 2005 / Notices brackets. All written submissions, except for CBI, will be made available for inspection by interested parties. The Commission intends to publish only a public report in this investigation. Accordingly, any CBI received by the Commission in this investigation will not be published in a manner that would reveal the operations of the firm supplying the information. The report will be made available to the public on the Commission’s Web site. The public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. Hearingimpaired individuals are advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202– 205–1810. Persons with mobility impairments who will need special assistance in gaining access to the Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at 202–205–2000. By order of the Commission. Issued: August 12, 2005. Marilyn R. Abbott, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. 05–16342 Filed 8–17–05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation No. 332–469] Conditions of Competition for Certain Oranges and Lemons in the U.S. Fresh Market United States International Trade Commission. ACTION: Correction of notice of investigation. AGENCY: SUMMARY: The Commission’s notice published in the Federal Register on August 8, 2005 (70 FR 45746) contained a typographical error that incorrectly identified ‘‘February 21, 2005’’ as the final date for receipt of any written submissions to the United States International Trade Commission regarding investigation No. 332–469 Conditions of Competition for Certain Oranges and Lemons in the U.S. Fresh Market, under section 332(g) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1332(g)). The correct date for written submissions on this investigation is February 21, 2006. By order of the Commission. Issued: August 11, 2005. Marilyn R. Abbott, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. 05–16341 Filed 8–17–05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P VerDate jul<14>2003 12:20 Aug 17, 2005 Jkt 205001 INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigations Nos. 701–TA–318 and 731– TA–538 and 561 (Second Review)] Sulfanilic Acid From China and India United States International Trade Commission. ACTION: Notice of Commission determination to conduct full five-year reviews concerning the countervailing duty order on sulfanilic acid from India and the antidumping duty orders on sulfanilic acid from China and India. AGENCY: SUMMARY: The Commission hereby gives notice that it will proceed with full reviews pursuant to section 751(c)(5) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)(5)) to determine whether revocation of the countervailing duty order on sulfanilic acid from India and the antidumping duty orders on sulfanilic acid from China and India would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury within a reasonably foreseeable time. A schedule for the reviews will be established and announced at a later date. For further information concerning the conduct of these reviews and rules of general application, consult the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure, part 201, subparts A through E (19 CFR part 201), and part 207, subparts A, D, E, and F (19 CFR part 207). Effective Date: August 5, 2005. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mary Messer (202–205–3193), Office of Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436. Hearingimpaired persons can obtain information on this matter by contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202– 205–1810. Persons with mobility impairments who will need special assistance in gaining access to the Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at 202–205–2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server (https:// www.usitc.gov). The public record for these reviews may be viewed on the Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On August 5, 2005, the Commission determined that it should proceed to full reviews in the subject five-year reviews pursuant to section 751(c)(5) of the Act.1 The Commission found that the domestic DATES: 1 Commissioner Marcia E. Miller did not participate in these determinations. PO 00000 Frm 00074 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 interested party group response to its notice of institution (70 FR 22698, May 2, 2005) was adequate, and that the respondent interested party group response with respect to India was adequate, but found that the respondent interested party group response with respect to China was inadequate. However, the Commission determined to conduct a full review concerning subject imports from China to promote administrative efficiency in light of its decision to conduct a full review with respect to subject imports from India. A record of the Commissioners’ votes, the Commission’s statement on adequacy, and any individual Commissioner’s statements will be available from the Office of the Secretary and at the Commission’s Web site. Authority: These reviews are being conducted under authority of title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930; this notice is published pursuant to section 207.62 of the Commission’s rules. By order of the Commission. Issued: August 11, 2005. Marilyn R. Abbott, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. 05–16340 Filed 8–17–05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation No. 731–TA–851 (Review)] Synthetic Indigo From China United States International Trade Commission. ACTION: Notice of Commission determination to conduct a full five-year review concerning the antidumping duty order on synthetic indigo from China. AGENCY: SUMMARY: The Commission hereby gives notice that it will proceed with a full review pursuant to section 751(c)(5) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)(5)) to determine whether revocation of the antidumping duty order on synthetic indigo from China would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury within a reasonably foreseeable time. A schedule for the review will be established and announced at a later date. For further information concerning the conduct of this review and rules of general application, consult the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure, part 201, subparts A through E (19 CFR part 201), and part 207, subparts A, D, E, and F (19 CFR part 207). DATES: Effective Date: August 5, 2005. E:\FR\FM\18AUN1.SGM 18AUN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 159 (Thursday, August 18, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 48588]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-16341]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Investigation No. 332-469]


Conditions of Competition for Certain Oranges and Lemons in the 
U.S. Fresh Market

AGENCY: United States International Trade Commission.

ACTION: Correction of notice of investigation.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Commission's notice published in the Federal Register on 
August 8, 2005 (70 FR 45746) contained a typographical error that 
incorrectly identified ``February 21, 2005'' as the final date for 
receipt of any written submissions to the United States International 
Trade Commission regarding investigation No. 332-469 Conditions of 
Competition for Certain Oranges and Lemons in the U.S. Fresh Market, 
under section 332(g) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1332(g)). The 
correct date for written submissions on this investigation is February 
21, 2006.

    By order of the Commission.

    Issued: August 11, 2005.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 05-16341 Filed 8-17-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.