Synthetic Indigo From China, 48588-48589 [05-16339]

Download as PDF 48588 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 159 / Thursday, August 18, 2005 / Notices brackets. All written submissions, except for CBI, will be made available for inspection by interested parties. The Commission intends to publish only a public report in this investigation. Accordingly, any CBI received by the Commission in this investigation will not be published in a manner that would reveal the operations of the firm supplying the information. The report will be made available to the public on the Commission’s Web site. The public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. Hearingimpaired individuals are advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202– 205–1810. Persons with mobility impairments who will need special assistance in gaining access to the Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at 202–205–2000. By order of the Commission. Issued: August 12, 2005. Marilyn R. Abbott, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. 05–16342 Filed 8–17–05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation No. 332–469] Conditions of Competition for Certain Oranges and Lemons in the U.S. Fresh Market United States International Trade Commission. ACTION: Correction of notice of investigation. AGENCY: SUMMARY: The Commission’s notice published in the Federal Register on August 8, 2005 (70 FR 45746) contained a typographical error that incorrectly identified ‘‘February 21, 2005’’ as the final date for receipt of any written submissions to the United States International Trade Commission regarding investigation No. 332–469 Conditions of Competition for Certain Oranges and Lemons in the U.S. Fresh Market, under section 332(g) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1332(g)). The correct date for written submissions on this investigation is February 21, 2006. By order of the Commission. Issued: August 11, 2005. Marilyn R. Abbott, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. 05–16341 Filed 8–17–05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P VerDate jul<14>2003 12:20 Aug 17, 2005 Jkt 205001 INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigations Nos. 701–TA–318 and 731– TA–538 and 561 (Second Review)] Sulfanilic Acid From China and India United States International Trade Commission. ACTION: Notice of Commission determination to conduct full five-year reviews concerning the countervailing duty order on sulfanilic acid from India and the antidumping duty orders on sulfanilic acid from China and India. AGENCY: SUMMARY: The Commission hereby gives notice that it will proceed with full reviews pursuant to section 751(c)(5) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)(5)) to determine whether revocation of the countervailing duty order on sulfanilic acid from India and the antidumping duty orders on sulfanilic acid from China and India would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury within a reasonably foreseeable time. A schedule for the reviews will be established and announced at a later date. For further information concerning the conduct of these reviews and rules of general application, consult the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure, part 201, subparts A through E (19 CFR part 201), and part 207, subparts A, D, E, and F (19 CFR part 207). Effective Date: August 5, 2005. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mary Messer (202–205–3193), Office of Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436. Hearingimpaired persons can obtain information on this matter by contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202– 205–1810. Persons with mobility impairments who will need special assistance in gaining access to the Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at 202–205–2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server (https:// www.usitc.gov). The public record for these reviews may be viewed on the Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On August 5, 2005, the Commission determined that it should proceed to full reviews in the subject five-year reviews pursuant to section 751(c)(5) of the Act.1 The Commission found that the domestic DATES: 1 Commissioner Marcia E. Miller did not participate in these determinations. PO 00000 Frm 00074 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 interested party group response to its notice of institution (70 FR 22698, May 2, 2005) was adequate, and that the respondent interested party group response with respect to India was adequate, but found that the respondent interested party group response with respect to China was inadequate. However, the Commission determined to conduct a full review concerning subject imports from China to promote administrative efficiency in light of its decision to conduct a full review with respect to subject imports from India. A record of the Commissioners’ votes, the Commission’s statement on adequacy, and any individual Commissioner’s statements will be available from the Office of the Secretary and at the Commission’s Web site. Authority: These reviews are being conducted under authority of title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930; this notice is published pursuant to section 207.62 of the Commission’s rules. By order of the Commission. Issued: August 11, 2005. Marilyn R. Abbott, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. 05–16340 Filed 8–17–05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation No. 731–TA–851 (Review)] Synthetic Indigo From China United States International Trade Commission. ACTION: Notice of Commission determination to conduct a full five-year review concerning the antidumping duty order on synthetic indigo from China. AGENCY: SUMMARY: The Commission hereby gives notice that it will proceed with a full review pursuant to section 751(c)(5) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)(5)) to determine whether revocation of the antidumping duty order on synthetic indigo from China would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury within a reasonably foreseeable time. A schedule for the review will be established and announced at a later date. For further information concerning the conduct of this review and rules of general application, consult the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure, part 201, subparts A through E (19 CFR part 201), and part 207, subparts A, D, E, and F (19 CFR part 207). DATES: Effective Date: August 5, 2005. E:\FR\FM\18AUN1.SGM 18AUN1 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 159 / Thursday, August 18, 2005 / Notices FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mary Messer (202–205–3193), Office of Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436. Hearingimpaired persons can obtain information on this matter by contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202– 205–1810. Persons with mobility impairments who will need special assistance in gaining access to the Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at 202–205–2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server (https:// www.usitc.gov). The public record for this review may be viewed on the Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On August 5, 2005, the Commission determined that it should proceed to a full review in the subject five-year review pursuant to section 751(c)(5) of the Act.1 The Commission found that both the domestic and respondent interested party group responses to its notice of institution (70 FR 22701, May 2, 2005) were adequate. A record of the Commissioners’ votes, the Commission’s statement on adequacy, and any individual Commissioner’s statements will be available from the Office of the Secretary and at the Commission’s Web site. Authority: This review is being conducted under authority of title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930; this notice is published pursuant to § 207.62 of the Commission’s rules. By order of the Commission. Issued: August 11, 2005. Marilyn R. Abbott, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. 05–16339 Filed 8–17–05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Notice of Lodging of Consent Decree Under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (‘‘CERCLA’’) Under the policy set out at 28 CFR 50.7, notice is hereby given that on August 2, 2005, the United States lodged with the United States District Court for the District of Montana a proposed consent decree (‘‘Consent Decree’’) in the case of United States v. Atlantic Richfield Company et al., Civil Action No. CV–89–39–BU–SEH. The 1 Commissioner Marcia E. Miller did not participate in this determination. VerDate jul<14>2003 12:20 Aug 17, 2005 Jkt 205001 Consent Decree pertains to the Milltown Reservoir Sediments Operable Unit (the ‘‘Milltown Site’’) in southwestern Montana. The settlement would resolve the claims brought by the United States against the Atlantic Richfield Company and NorthWestern Corporation under Section 107 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act of 1980, as amended (‘‘CERCLA’’), 42 U.S.C. 9607, for the recovery of costs incurred and to be incurred in responding to releases and threatened releases of hazardous substances at the Milltown Site. Under the terms of the proposed Consent Decree, Atlantic Richfield and NorthWestern will implement EPA’s cleanup plan for the Milltown Site, reimburse certain EPA response costs related to the Milltown Site, and contribute toward the State of Montana’s natural resource restoration plan for the Milltown site. The United States, on behalf of certain federal agencies against which Atlantic Richfield asserted counterclaims, will also be contributing toward the reimbursement of EPA’s response costs. The Department of Justice will receive for a period of thirty (30) days from the date of this publication comments relating to the Consent Decree. Comments should be addressed to the Deputy Assistant Attorney General, Environment and Natural Resources Division, P.O. Box 7611, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC 20044–7611, and should refer to United States v. ARCO, DOJ Case Number 90– 11–2–430. The proposed Consent Decree may be examined at the office of the United States Attorney for the District of Montana, 2929 Third Avenue North, Suite 400, Billings, Montana 59101, and at U.S. EPA Region VIII Montana Office, Federal Building, 10 West 15th Street, Suite 3200, Helena, Montana 59624. During the public comment period, the Consent Decree, may also be examined on the following Department of Justice Web site, https://www.usdoj.gov/enrd/ open.html. A copy of the Consent Decree may also be obtained by mail from the Consent Decree Library, P.O. Box 7611, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC 20044–7611 or by faxing or e-mailing a request to Tonia Fleetwood (tonia.fleetwood@usdoj.gov), fax no. (202) 514–0097, phone confirmation number (202) 514–1547. In requesting a copy of the Consent Decree, please reference United States v. ARCO, DOJ Case Number 90–11–2–430, and enclose a check in the amount of $10.00 PO 00000 Frm 00075 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 48589 (25 cents per page reproduction cost) payable to the U.S. Treasury. Robert D. Brook, Assistant Chief, Environmental Enforcement Section, Environment and Natural Resources Division. [FR Doc. 05–16348 Filed 8–17–05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4410–15–M DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Notice of Lodging of Consent Decree Under the Clean Water Act Consistent with 28 CFR 50.7, notice is hereby given that on August 3, 2005, a proposed consent decree (‘‘decree’’) in United States v. Degussa Initiators, LLC., Civil Action No. 1:05CV1915, was lodged with the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio. In this action, the United States seeks civil penalties against Degussa for violations of section 307(d) and 308 of the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. 1317(d) and 1318, including violation of categorical and local effluent limits contained in industrial user permits issued by the Elyria, Ohio publicly owned treatment works. The proposed decree provides that Degussa will pay a civil penalty of $345,203.50 and will perform a supplemental environmental project valued at $27,514. Degussa also certifies in the proposed decree that it has implemented corrective measures necessary to ensure continuous compliance with applicable effluent limits and other permit terms. The Department of Justice will receive comments relating to the decree for a period of thirty (30) days from the date of this publication. Comments should be addressed to the Assistant Attorney General, Environment and Natural Resources Division, P.O. Box 7611, Ben Franklin Station, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC 20044–7611, and should refer to United States v. Degussa LLC, D.J. Ref. 90–5–1–1–07956. The decree may be examined at the Office of the United States Attorney, 1800 One Bank Center, 600 Superior Avenue, Cleveland, Ohio 44114–2654 and at the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604–3590. During the public comment period, the decree may also be examined on the following Department of Justice Web site, https:// www.usdoj.gov/enrd/open.html. A copy of the decree may also be obtained by mail from the Consent Decree Library, P.O. Box 7611, Ben Franklin Station, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC 20044–7611 or by faxing or emailing a request to Tonia Fleetwood E:\FR\FM\18AUN1.SGM 18AUN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 159 (Thursday, August 18, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 48588-48589]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-16339]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Investigation No. 731-TA-851 (Review)]


Synthetic Indigo From China

AGENCY: United States International Trade Commission.

ACTION: Notice of Commission determination to conduct a full five-year 
review concerning the antidumping duty order on synthetic indigo from 
China.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Commission hereby gives notice that it will proceed with a 
full review pursuant to section 751(c)(5) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 
U.S.C. 1675(c)(5)) to determine whether revocation of the antidumping 
duty order on synthetic indigo from China would be likely to lead to 
continuation or recurrence of material injury within a reasonably 
foreseeable time. A schedule for the review will be established and 
announced at a later date. For further information concerning the 
conduct of this review and rules of general application, consult the 
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, part 201, subparts A 
through E (19 CFR part 201), and part 207, subparts A, D, E, and F (19 
CFR part 207).

dates: Effective Date: August 5, 2005.

[[Page 48589]]


FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mary Messer (202-205-3193), Office of 
Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., 
Washington, DC 20436. Hearing-impaired persons can obtain information 
on this matter by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal on 202-205-
1810. Persons with mobility impairments who will need special 
assistance in gaining access to the Commission should contact the 
Office of the Secretary at 202-205-2000. General information concerning 
the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server 
(https://www.usitc.gov). The public record for this review may be viewed 
on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On August 5, 2005, the Commission determined 
that it should proceed to a full review in the subject five-year review 
pursuant to section 751(c)(5) of the Act.\1\ The Commission found that 
both the domestic and respondent interested party group responses to 
its notice of institution (70 FR 22701, May 2, 2005) were adequate. A 
record of the Commissioners' votes, the Commission's statement on 
adequacy, and any individual Commissioner's statements will be 
available from the Office of the Secretary and at the Commission's Web 
site.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ Commissioner Marcia E. Miller did not participate in this 
determination.

    Authority: This review is being conducted under authority of 
title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930; this notice is published 
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
pursuant to Sec.  207.62 of the Commission's rules.

    By order of the Commission.

    Issued: August 11, 2005.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 05-16339 Filed 8-17-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.