Filings Under the Public Utility Holding Company Act of 1935, as Amended (“Act”), 47871-47873 [E5-4406]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 156 / Monday, August 15, 2005 / Notices
guarantees on behalf of their
subsidiaries, the Intermediate Holding
Companies are not used for external
financing purposes, to make
acquisitions, or to perform service, sales
or construction contracts.21
The continued existence of these
holding companies also will help to
preserve favorable tax attributes that
would be lost if they were eliminated.
In particular, the Intermediate Holding
Companies provide flexibility with
respect to the filing of state tax
returns.22
For the Commission, by the Division of
Investment Management, pursuant to
delegated authority.
Margaret H. McFarland,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. E5–4404 Filed 8–12–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 35–28011]
Filings Under the Public Utility Holding
Company Act of 1935, as Amended
(‘‘Act’’)
August 2, 2005.
Notice is hereby given that the
following filing(s) has/have been made
with the Commission pursuant to
provisions of the Act and rules
promulgated under the Act. All
interested persons are referred to the
application(s) and/or declaration(s) for
complete statements of the proposed
transaction(s) summarized below. The
application(s) and/or declaration(s) and
any amendment(s) is/are available for
public inspection through the
Commission’s Branch of Public
Reference.
Interested persons wishing to
comment or request a hearing on the
application(s) and/or declaration(s)
should submit their views in writing by
August 26, 2005, to the Secretary,
Securities and Exchange Commission,
100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC
20549–9303 and serve a copy on the
21 CMP Group does not issue securities to parties
outside of the Energy East group to finance its
subsidiaries.
22 In addition to these structural and regulatory
benefits, the continued existence of CTG Resources
will also preserve the benefits associated with
certain existing financing arrangements.
Specifically, Ten Companies currently has
approximately $40 million of private placement
bonds outstanding that are supported by CTG
Resources under the terms of a Forward Equity
Purchase Agreement. The elimination of CTG
Resources would constitute an event of default
under the notes and the holders would have the
right to ‘‘put’’ the bonds to the issuer at a large
(approximately $5 million) make-whole premium.
VerDate jul<14>2003
13:17 Aug 12, 2005
Jkt 205001
relevant applicant(s) and/or declarant(s)
at the address(es) specified below. Proof
of service (by affidavit or, in the case of
an attorney at law, by certificate) should
be filed with the request. Any request
for hearing should identify specifically
the issues of facts or law that are
disputed. A person who so requests will
be notified of any hearing, if ordered,
and will receive a copy of any notice or
order issued in the matter. After August
26, 2005, the application(s) and/or
declaration(s), as filed or as amended,
may be granted and/or permitted to
become effective.
PNM Resources, Inc., et al. (70–10320)
PNM Resources, Inc., (‘‘PNM
Resources’’), a registered holding
company; Texas New Mexico Power
Company, a Texas corporation and
electric public utility company,
(‘‘TNMP’’); and TNP Enterprises, Inc. a
Texas corporation and wholly-owned
holding company subsidiary of PNM
Resources (‘‘TNP Enterprises’’), all of
4100 International Plaza, P.O. Box 2943,
Fort Worth, Texas 76113, have filed a
declaration, as amended (‘‘Declaration’’)
under sections 6(a), 7, and 12(c), of the
Act and rules 42 and 46, under the Act.
PNM Resources, TNMP and TNP
Enterprise are collectively referred to as
‘‘Applicants.’’
PNM Resources and its subsidiary
TNP Enterprises are registered public
utility holding companies. PNM
Resources acquired TNP Enterprises on
June 6, 2005, and as a result of the
acquisition, TNP Enterprises has no
employees or active operations, and
serves as a financial conduit.
TNP Enterprises has two subsidiaries,
TNMP and FCP Enterprises, Inc., a
Delaware corporation formed as an
intermediate subsidiary to hold
businesses that qualify under Rule 58,
including First Choice Power, L.P. and
First Choice Power Special Purpose,
L.P. (‘‘First Choice’’).1 First Choice was
organized to act as TNMP’s affiliated
retail electric provider in accordance
with Texas Senate Bill 7, which
established retail competition in the
Texas electricity market. TNMP is a
1 First Choice Power Special Purpose, L.P. is a
bankruptcy remote special purpose entity
certificated retail electric provider (‘‘REP’’) in Texas
to which the original REP certificate of First Choice
Power, Inc. and its price to beat customers were
transferred pursuant to order of the Public Utility
Commission of Texas. A new certificate was granted
to First Choice Power, Inc., which is now First
Choice Power, L.P., also a direct subsidiary of TNP
Enterprises. These entities are collectively referred
to as ‘‘First Choice.’’ First Choice does not derive
material revenue from the public-utility company
affiliates.
PO 00000
Frm 00088
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
47871
regulated utility operating in Texas and
New Mexico.
Prior to January 1, 2002 when retail
competition in the Texas electricity
market was established, TNMP operated
as an integrated electric utility in Texas,
generating, transmitting and distributing
electricity to customers in its Texas
service territory. As required by Senate
Bill 7, and in accordance with a plan
approved by the Public Utility
Commission of Texas (‘‘PUCT’’), TNMP
separated its Texas utility operations
into three components:
• Retail Sales Activities. As
mentioned above, First Choice assumed
the activities related to the sale of
electricity to retail customers in Texas,
and, on January 1, 2002, TNMP’s
customers became customers of First
Choice, unless they chose a different
retail electric provider.
• Power Transmission and
Distribution. TNMP continues to operate
its regulated transmission and
distribution business in Texas.
• Power Generation. Texas
Generating Company (‘‘TGC’’) became
the unregulated entity performing
TNMP’s generation activities in Texas.
However, in October 2002, TNMP and
TGC sold TNP One (TGC’s sole
generating asset) to Sempra Energy
Resources. As a result of the sale, TGC
and TGC II neither own property nor
engage in any operating activities, and
neither TNMP nor any of its affiliates
are currently in the power generation
business.
TNMP initially sought recovery of
$307.6 million of stranded costs
pertaining to the generation assets
rendered uneconomic by Texas
restructuring from its customers, an
amount which was later revised to
$266.5 million. On July 22, 2004, the
PUCT authorized TNMP to recover from
its customers $87.3 million instead of
the $266.5 million requested. The
decision resulted in a loss of $155.2
million before an income tax benefit of
$57.3 million ($97.8 million after tax).
As a result, TNMP reported on August
9, 2004 a loss applicable to common
stock of $97.0 million for the quarter
ended June 30, 2004. TNMP recorded
the $97.8 million after tax loss as an
extraordinary item in accordance with
the requirements of Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards
(‘‘SFAS’’) 101—Regulated Enterprises—
accounting for the discontinuance of the
application of FASB Statement No. 71.
TNP Enterprises reported a net loss for
calendar 2004 of $75,603,000 and
negative shareholder equity of
$29,680,000.
On the day of its acquisition by PNM
Resources, TNP Enterprises refunded
E:\FR\FM\15AUN1.SGM
15AUN1
47872
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 156 / Monday, August 15, 2005 / Notices
the balance of its outstanding term loans
and issued irrevocable notices to
redeem its outstanding high coupon
senior subordinated notes and preferred
stock effective July 6, 2005. Such
securities were redeemed on that date.
See HCAR No. 27979 (June 1, 2005).
The acquisition of TNP Enterprises
will be accounted for using the
‘‘purchase method’’ under SFAS 141,
Business Combinations, with associated
intangible assets and goodwill recorded
on the balance sheets in accordance
with SFAS 142, Goodwill and Other
Intangible Assets. Since PNM Resources
has acquired all of the stock of TNP
Enterprises, the ‘‘push-down basis of
accounting’’ will be used.2 Under this
method, the cost of the acquisition will
be allocated to the acquired company’s
assets and liabilities, which are
recorded on the balance sheet at fair
market value. Even though Commission
accounting rules require PNM Resources
to use push-down accounting and to
value the acquisition at fair value,
resulting in the recording of goodwill
and intangible assets on TNMP’s
balance sheet, the goodwill and
intangible assets will not be included in
rate base or amortized as a component
of cost of service in any state rate
proceedings.
Currently, as a result of purchase
accounting and the push-down of the
amount paid in excess of book value for
the TNP Enterprises system, the
Shareholder Equity account of TNMP
will be increased by $429 million, from
$194 million to $623 million, and the
retained earnings account of TNMP will
be reset upwards to zero.
The manner in which PNM Resources
acquired TNP Enterprises, and thereby
TNMP, was designed to improve
TNMP’s credit ratings from BB+/Baa3
prior to the acquisition announcement
to investment grade, BBB¥/Baa3, and to
maintain them at that level in order to
provide consistent access to the capital
markets at reasonable rates, which
allows TNMP to fund necessary utility
system improvements. Also, the
acquisition was structured so as not to
damage PNM Resources’ credit ratings.
Through the financial models provided
to the rating agencies in advance of the
acquisition of TNP Enterprises, both
major agencies were aware of the plan
to dividend and distribute cash from
2 Because PNM Resources acquired all of the
stock of TNP Enterprises, S.E.C. Codification of
Staff Accounting Bulletins (‘‘SAB’’) Topic 5J,
Miscellaneous Accounting, provides that the ‘‘push
down basis of accounting’’ be used for financial
reporting purposes. The Commission has found
‘‘push-down’’ accounting appropriate on these
circumstances. See HCAR No. 27896 (Sept. 27,
2004) at 18.
VerDate jul<14>2003
13:17 Aug 12, 2005
Jkt 205001
TNMP and First Choice to PNM
Resources following the acquisition of
TNP Enterprises.
The acquisition of TNP Enterprises
has, in fact, improved the credit ratings
of TNP Enterprises and its subsidiaries,
including TNMP. All rating agencies
referenced in their reports the stronger
credit profile of PNM Resources, as well
as the TNP Enterprises debt reduction
resulting from the acquisition. Standard
& Poor’s raised the rating of TNMP
following the acquisition to BBB from
BB+. In addition, Moody’s increased its
credit rating to Baa3, as Applicants
anticipated.3
A. Requested Authorizations
Applicants request four related
authorizations in this filing. First,
TNMP requests authorization through
December 31, 2005 to redeem $62
million of its common stock held by
TNP Enterprises, its parent. Second,
PNM Resources and TNP Enterprises
seek authority for their nonutility
subsidiaries to distribute surplus, retire
or redeem securities or pay dividends
from capital through December 31,
2007. Third, TNP Enterprises requests
authority to pay dividends (or to redeem
capital stock) so as to distribute the
proceeds received from its subsidiaries
to PNM Resources pursuant to this
filing. Applicants state that the need for
the requested authorizations results
from (i) the extraordinary effect of Texas
restructuring on the book value of
generation and the disallowance of
stranded cost recovery; (ii) the
application of push-down accounting
for the recent acquisition by PNM
Resources and (iii) the short-term debt
incurred by PNM Resources to
effectuate the acquisition of TNP
Enterprises.
Applicants represent that (i) all
dividends, redemptions of stock and
other distributions authorized in this
filing would be made in compliance
with all applicable laws, (ii) no
nonutility subsidiary that derives any
material part of its revenues from the
sale of goods, services or electricity to
any public utility subsidiary shall
declare or pay any dividend out of
capital or unearned surplus, and (iii) no
nonutility subsidiary shall declare or
pay any dividend out of capital or
unearned surplus unless it: (a) Has
received excess cash as a result of the
3 The refinancing of the debt and preferred
securities at the TNP Enterprises level has resulted
in debt and preferred securities representing less
than 40% (approximately 37.3%) of the
consolidated capitalization of TNP Enterprises at
the close of 2005, opposed to in excess of 100% in
the absence of the acquisition and the relief sought
in this filing.
PO 00000
Frm 00089
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
sale of its assets, (b) has engaged in a
restructuring or reorganization, and/or
(c) is returning capital to an associate
company.
Fourth, TNMP requests authority to
be added to a $400,000,000 Credit
Facility Agreement among PNM
Resources, Inc. and Bank of America,
N.A. (as Administrative Agent for
Lenders) dated November 15, 2004, as
amended (‘‘Revolving Credit Facility’’)
maintained by PNM Resources,4 under
which it would be eligible to borrow up
to $100 million pursuant to a note with
a five-year maturity and two additional
one-year extension options (if approved
by the banking institutions) through
August 1, 2012. Borrowings made by
PNM Resources pursuant to the
Revolving Credit Facility are pursuant
to and subject to authority conferred in
PNM Resources, Inc., HCAR No. 27934
(December 30, 2004). TNMP proposes
that the same conditions apply to its
borrowings under the Revolving Credit
Facility. Borrowings by the individual
borrowers under the Revolving Credit
Facility occur on a several, not joint,
obligation basis. Such borrowings
would be evidenced by ‘‘transactional’’
promissory notes to be dated the date of
such borrowings and to mature not more
than five years after the date. Any such
note may or may not be prepayable, in
whole or in part, with or without a
premium in the event of prepayment.5
TNMP proposes to use the revolving
credit facility to provide funds for its
authorized operations.
B. Parameters for Financing
Authorization
The following general terms would be
applicable, as appropriate, to the
transactions requested to be authorized
in the Declaration:
(1) Common Equity Ratio. Applicants
state that each would at all times
maintain common equity (as reflected in
its most recent Form 10–K or Form 10–
4 Section 2.6 of the Revolving Credit Facility
specifically provides for First Choice and TNMP
borrowing in accordance with its terms following
the acquisition completed on June 6, 2005.
5 On behalf of PNM Resources, TNMP notes that,
at any given time, some or all of its outstanding
short-term notes will be issuable in connection with
the establishment of back-up credit facilities
pursuant to PNM Resources’ commercial paper
program but that such credit facilities will not be
drawn upon and no borrowings will occur except
in certain limited circumstances at which time
obligations under the related commercial paper will
be paid. Thus, short-term notes issued in
connection with the establishment of commercial
paper back-up facilities backstop and duplicate
commercial paper issuances and should not be
deemed to be borrowings under TNMP or PNM
Resources’ financing authorization unless and until
an actual borrowing occurs under the related credit
facility. Any other result would ‘‘double count’’
PNM Resources’ actual financial obligation.
E:\FR\FM\15AUN1.SGM
15AUN1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 156 / Monday, August 15, 2005 / Notices
Q filed with the Commission) of at least
30% of its consolidated capitalization.
The term ‘‘consolidated capitalization’’
is defined to include, where applicable,
all common stock equity (comprised of
common stock, additional paid in
capital, retained earnings, accumulated
other comprehensive income or loss
and/or treasury stock), minority
interests, preferred stock, preferred
securities, equity linked securities, longterm debt, short-term debt and current
maturities.
(2) Investment Grade Ratings. With
respect to the securities issuance
authority proposed in this Declaration:
(a) Within four business days after the
occurrence of a Ratings Event,6
Applicants would notify the
Commission of its occurrence (by means
of a letter, via fax, email or overnight
mail to the Office of Public Utility
Regulation); and (b) within 30 days after
the occurrence of a Ratings Event,
Applicants would submit a posteffective amendment to the Declaration
explaining the material facts and
circumstances relating to that Ratings
Event (including the basis on which,
taking into account the interests of
investors, consumers and the public as
well as other applicable criteria under
the Act, it remains appropriate for
Applicant(s) to issue the securities for
which authorization has been requested
in this Declaration, so long as
Applicant(s) continue to comply with
the other applicable terms and
conditions specified in the
Commission’s order authorizing the
transactions requested in this filing).
Furthermore, no securities authorized as
a result of this Declaration would be
issued following the 60th day after a
Ratings Event (other than common
stock, commercial paper and short-term
debt) by any Applicant if the
downgraded rating(s) has or have not
been upgraded to investment grade.
Applicants request that the Commission
reserve jurisdiction through the
remainder of the period authorized in
this filling over the issuance of any
securities (other than common stock,
commercial paper and short-term notes)
that Applicants are prohibited from
issuing as a result of the occurrence of
a Ratings Event if no revised rating
6 A ‘‘Ratings Event’’ would occur if, during the
authorization period requested in this filing, (i) any
security issued by any Applicant upon original
issuance, if rated, is rated below investment grade;
or (ii) any outstanding security of any Applicant
that is rated is downgraded below investment grade.
For purposes of this provision, a security would be
deemed to be rated ‘‘investment grade’’ if it is rated
investment grade by at least one nationally
recognized statistical rating organization, as that
term is used in paragraphs (c)(2)(vi)(E), (F) and (H)
of rule 15c3–1 under the 1934 Act.
VerDate jul<14>2003
13:17 Aug 12, 2005
Jkt 205001
reflecting an investment grade rating has
been issued.
(3) Effective Cost of Money on
Financings. The effective cost of capital
would not exceed competitive market
rates available at the time of issuance for
securities having the same or reasonably
similar terms and conditions issued by
similar companies of reasonably
comparable credit quality; provided that
in no event would the effective cost of
capital exceed 500 basis points over
comparable term U.S. Treasury
securities (‘‘Treasury Security’’).
(4) Maturity. The final maturity of any
long-term debt securities would not
exceed five years. Short-term debt
incurred under the Revolver would have
a maturity of not to exceed one year.
(5) Issuance Expenses. The fees,
commissions or other similar
remuneration paid in connection with
the non-competitive issue, sale or
distribution of securities pursuant to
this Declaration would not exceed the
competitive market rates which are
consistent with similar securities of
comparable credit quality and
maturities issued by other companies,
provided that in no event would such
fees and expenses exceed 500 basis
points of the principal or face amount
of the securities being issued or the
gross proceeds of the financing.
(6) Use of Proceeds. The proceeds
from the borrowing would be used for
general corporate purposes including (i)
the financing of working capital
requirements of the PNM Resources
system, (ii) cash management activities
and (iii) other lawful purposes.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Investment Management, pursuant to
delegated authority.
Jill M. Peterson,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. E5–4406 Filed 8–12–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–52224; File No. SR–NSX–
2005–03]
Self-Regulatory Organizations;
National Stock Exchange; Order
Granting Approval to Proposed Rule
Change, and Amendments No. 1 and 2
Thereto, Relating to the Ongoing
Qualification of the Members of NSX’s
Board of Directors
August 8, 2005.
On May 13, 2005, the National Stock
Exchange (the ‘‘Exchange’’ or ‘‘NSX’’)
filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (‘‘Commission’’), pursuant
PO 00000
Frm 00090
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
47873
to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (‘‘Act’’),1 and
Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2 a proposed rule
change to amend its By-Laws to
implement procedures for replacing a
Director on its Board of Directors
(‘‘Board’’) in the event that such
Director fails to maintain the
qualifications of his or her designated
category. On June 10, 2005, the
Exchange filed Amendment No. 1 to the
proposed rule change.3 On June 21,
2005, the Exchange filed Amendment
No. 2 to the proposed rule change.4 The
proposed rule change, as amended, was
published for comment in the Federal
Register on June 30, 2005.5 The
Commission received no comments on
the proposal.
The Exchange proposed to amend
Article V, Section 3 of its By-Laws to
provide that: (A) If a Director fails to
maintain the necessary qualifications of
his or her respective category, such
Director would cease to be a Director
upon a determination by the Board that
the Director is no longer qualified, and
his or her office would be deemed
vacant for all purposes; (B) a Director
who fails to maintain his or her
necessary qualifications would have a
grace period of the later of 45 days or
until the next regular Board meeting to
re-qualify for his or her respective
category; and (C) a Director (other than
an Independent Director) whose
membership has been suspended does
not lose his or her qualification by
reason of such suspension during the
period of suspension, but rather, such
Director may remain a Director during
the suspension unless he or she is
removed.6
Under the proposal, the Board is the
sole judge of whether a Director is no
longer qualified for his designated
category and whether a Director has requalified. Effective upon the expiration
of the grace period for re-qualification,
the Board may fill any resulting vacancy
with a person who qualifies for the
category in which the vacancy exists.
The Commission finds that the
proposed rule change, as amended, is
1 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
CFR 240.19b–4.
3 In Amendment No. 1, the Exchange clarified
certain language in Section 3(a) of the proposed rule
change, made conforming changes to Exhibit 1 to
the proposed rule change and corrected page
numbering errors in the initial filing.
4 In Amendment No. 2, the Exchange revised the
proposed rule text, as well as, the proposed rule
change’s statutory basis section.
5 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 51912
(June 23, 2005), 70 FR 37889.
6 A Director may be removed with cause by a
majority vote of those individuals or entities
entitled to vote to elect such Director. See Article
V, Section 4 of the NSX By-Laws.
2 17
E:\FR\FM\15AUN1.SGM
15AUN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 156 (Monday, August 15, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 47871-47873]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E5-4406]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 35-28011]
Filings Under the Public Utility Holding Company Act of 1935, as
Amended (``Act'')
August 2, 2005.
Notice is hereby given that the following filing(s) has/have been
made with the Commission pursuant to provisions of the Act and rules
promulgated under the Act. All interested persons are referred to the
application(s) and/or declaration(s) for complete statements of the
proposed transaction(s) summarized below. The application(s) and/or
declaration(s) and any amendment(s) is/are available for public
inspection through the Commission's Branch of Public Reference.
Interested persons wishing to comment or request a hearing on the
application(s) and/or declaration(s) should submit their views in
writing by August 26, 2005, to the Secretary, Securities and Exchange
Commission, 100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC 20549-9303 and serve a
copy on the relevant applicant(s) and/or declarant(s) at the
address(es) specified below. Proof of service (by affidavit or, in the
case of an attorney at law, by certificate) should be filed with the
request. Any request for hearing should identify specifically the
issues of facts or law that are disputed. A person who so requests will
be notified of any hearing, if ordered, and will receive a copy of any
notice or order issued in the matter. After August 26, 2005, the
application(s) and/or declaration(s), as filed or as amended, may be
granted and/or permitted to become effective.
PNM Resources, Inc., et al. (70-10320)
PNM Resources, Inc., (``PNM Resources''), a registered holding
company; Texas New Mexico Power Company, a Texas corporation and
electric public utility company, (``TNMP''); and TNP Enterprises, Inc.
a Texas corporation and wholly-owned holding company subsidiary of PNM
Resources (``TNP Enterprises''), all of 4100 International Plaza, P.O.
Box 2943, Fort Worth, Texas 76113, have filed a declaration, as amended
(``Declaration'') under sections 6(a), 7, and 12(c), of the Act and
rules 42 and 46, under the Act. PNM Resources, TNMP and TNP Enterprise
are collectively referred to as ``Applicants.''
PNM Resources and its subsidiary TNP Enterprises are registered
public utility holding companies. PNM Resources acquired TNP
Enterprises on June 6, 2005, and as a result of the acquisition, TNP
Enterprises has no employees or active operations, and serves as a
financial conduit.
TNP Enterprises has two subsidiaries, TNMP and FCP Enterprises,
Inc., a Delaware corporation formed as an intermediate subsidiary to
hold businesses that qualify under Rule 58, including First Choice
Power, L.P. and First Choice Power Special Purpose, L.P. (``First
Choice'').\1\ First Choice was organized to act as TNMP's affiliated
retail electric provider in accordance with Texas Senate Bill 7, which
established retail competition in the Texas electricity market. TNMP is
a regulated utility operating in Texas and New Mexico.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ First Choice Power Special Purpose, L.P. is a bankruptcy
remote special purpose entity certificated retail electric provider
(``REP'') in Texas to which the original REP certificate of First
Choice Power, Inc. and its price to beat customers were transferred
pursuant to order of the Public Utility Commission of Texas. A new
certificate was granted to First Choice Power, Inc., which is now
First Choice Power, L.P., also a direct subsidiary of TNP
Enterprises. These entities are collectively referred to as ``First
Choice.'' First Choice does not derive material revenue from the
public-utility company affiliates.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Prior to January 1, 2002 when retail competition in the Texas
electricity market was established, TNMP operated as an integrated
electric utility in Texas, generating, transmitting and distributing
electricity to customers in its Texas service territory. As required by
Senate Bill 7, and in accordance with a plan approved by the Public
Utility Commission of Texas (``PUCT''), TNMP separated its Texas
utility operations into three components:
Retail Sales Activities. As mentioned above, First Choice
assumed the activities related to the sale of electricity to retail
customers in Texas, and, on January 1, 2002, TNMP's customers became
customers of First Choice, unless they chose a different retail
electric provider.
Power Transmission and Distribution. TNMP continues to
operate its regulated transmission and distribution business in Texas.
Power Generation. Texas Generating Company (``TGC'')
became the unregulated entity performing TNMP's generation activities
in Texas. However, in October 2002, TNMP and TGC sold TNP One (TGC's
sole generating asset) to Sempra Energy Resources. As a result of the
sale, TGC and TGC II neither own property nor engage in any operating
activities, and neither TNMP nor any of its affiliates are currently in
the power generation business.
TNMP initially sought recovery of $307.6 million of stranded costs
pertaining to the generation assets rendered uneconomic by Texas
restructuring from its customers, an amount which was later revised to
$266.5 million. On July 22, 2004, the PUCT authorized TNMP to recover
from its customers $87.3 million instead of the $266.5 million
requested. The decision resulted in a loss of $155.2 million before an
income tax benefit of $57.3 million ($97.8 million after tax). As a
result, TNMP reported on August 9, 2004 a loss applicable to common
stock of $97.0 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2004. TNMP
recorded the $97.8 million after tax loss as an extraordinary item in
accordance with the requirements of Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards (``SFAS'') 101--Regulated Enterprises--accounting for the
discontinuance of the application of FASB Statement No. 71. TNP
Enterprises reported a net loss for calendar 2004 of $75,603,000 and
negative shareholder equity of $29,680,000.
On the day of its acquisition by PNM Resources, TNP Enterprises
refunded
[[Page 47872]]
the balance of its outstanding term loans and issued irrevocable
notices to redeem its outstanding high coupon senior subordinated notes
and preferred stock effective July 6, 2005. Such securities were
redeemed on that date. See HCAR No. 27979 (June 1, 2005).
The acquisition of TNP Enterprises will be accounted for using the
``purchase method'' under SFAS 141, Business Combinations, with
associated intangible assets and goodwill recorded on the balance
sheets in accordance with SFAS 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible
Assets. Since PNM Resources has acquired all of the stock of TNP
Enterprises, the ``push-down basis of accounting'' will be used.\2\
Under this method, the cost of the acquisition will be allocated to the
acquired company's assets and liabilities, which are recorded on the
balance sheet at fair market value. Even though Commission accounting
rules require PNM Resources to use push-down accounting and to value
the acquisition at fair value, resulting in the recording of goodwill
and intangible assets on TNMP's balance sheet, the goodwill and
intangible assets will not be included in rate base or amortized as a
component of cost of service in any state rate proceedings.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ Because PNM Resources acquired all of the stock of TNP
Enterprises, S.E.C. Codification of Staff Accounting Bulletins
(``SAB'') Topic 5J, Miscellaneous Accounting, provides that the
``push down basis of accounting'' be used for financial reporting
purposes. The Commission has found ``push-down'' accounting
appropriate on these circumstances. See HCAR No. 27896 (Sept. 27,
2004) at 18.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Currently, as a result of purchase accounting and the push-down of
the amount paid in excess of book value for the TNP Enterprises system,
the Shareholder Equity account of TNMP will be increased by $429
million, from $194 million to $623 million, and the retained earnings
account of TNMP will be reset upwards to zero.
The manner in which PNM Resources acquired TNP Enterprises, and
thereby TNMP, was designed to improve TNMP's credit ratings from BB+/
Baa3 prior to the acquisition announcement to investment grade, BBB-/
Baa3, and to maintain them at that level in order to provide consistent
access to the capital markets at reasonable rates, which allows TNMP to
fund necessary utility system improvements. Also, the acquisition was
structured so as not to damage PNM Resources' credit ratings. Through
the financial models provided to the rating agencies in advance of the
acquisition of TNP Enterprises, both major agencies were aware of the
plan to dividend and distribute cash from TNMP and First Choice to PNM
Resources following the acquisition of TNP Enterprises.
The acquisition of TNP Enterprises has, in fact, improved the
credit ratings of TNP Enterprises and its subsidiaries, including TNMP.
All rating agencies referenced in their reports the stronger credit
profile of PNM Resources, as well as the TNP Enterprises debt reduction
resulting from the acquisition. Standard & Poor's raised the rating of
TNMP following the acquisition to BBB from BB+. In addition, Moody's
increased its credit rating to Baa3, as Applicants anticipated.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ The refinancing of the debt and preferred securities at the
TNP Enterprises level has resulted in debt and preferred securities
representing less than 40% (approximately 37.3%) of the consolidated
capitalization of TNP Enterprises at the close of 2005, opposed to
in excess of 100% in the absence of the acquisition and the relief
sought in this filing.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
A. Requested Authorizations
Applicants request four related authorizations in this filing.
First, TNMP requests authorization through December 31, 2005 to redeem
$62 million of its common stock held by TNP Enterprises, its parent.
Second, PNM Resources and TNP Enterprises seek authority for their
nonutility subsidiaries to distribute surplus, retire or redeem
securities or pay dividends from capital through December 31, 2007.
Third, TNP Enterprises requests authority to pay dividends (or to
redeem capital stock) so as to distribute the proceeds received from
its subsidiaries to PNM Resources pursuant to this filing. Applicants
state that the need for the requested authorizations results from (i)
the extraordinary effect of Texas restructuring on the book value of
generation and the disallowance of stranded cost recovery; (ii) the
application of push-down accounting for the recent acquisition by PNM
Resources and (iii) the short-term debt incurred by PNM Resources to
effectuate the acquisition of TNP Enterprises.
Applicants represent that (i) all dividends, redemptions of stock
and other distributions authorized in this filing would be made in
compliance with all applicable laws, (ii) no nonutility subsidiary that
derives any material part of its revenues from the sale of goods,
services or electricity to any public utility subsidiary shall declare
or pay any dividend out of capital or unearned surplus, and (iii) no
nonutility subsidiary shall declare or pay any dividend out of capital
or unearned surplus unless it: (a) Has received excess cash as a result
of the sale of its assets, (b) has engaged in a restructuring or
reorganization, and/or (c) is returning capital to an associate
company.
Fourth, TNMP requests authority to be added to a $400,000,000
Credit Facility Agreement among PNM Resources, Inc. and Bank of
America, N.A. (as Administrative Agent for Lenders) dated November 15,
2004, as amended (``Revolving Credit Facility'') maintained by PNM
Resources,\4\ under which it would be eligible to borrow up to $100
million pursuant to a note with a five-year maturity and two additional
one-year extension options (if approved by the banking institutions)
through August 1, 2012. Borrowings made by PNM Resources pursuant to
the Revolving Credit Facility are pursuant to and subject to authority
conferred in PNM Resources, Inc., HCAR No. 27934 (December 30, 2004).
TNMP proposes that the same conditions apply to its borrowings under
the Revolving Credit Facility. Borrowings by the individual borrowers
under the Revolving Credit Facility occur on a several, not joint,
obligation basis. Such borrowings would be evidenced by
``transactional'' promissory notes to be dated the date of such
borrowings and to mature not more than five years after the date. Any
such note may or may not be prepayable, in whole or in part, with or
without a premium in the event of prepayment.\5\ TNMP proposes to use
the revolving credit facility to provide funds for its authorized
operations.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ Section 2.6 of the Revolving Credit Facility specifically
provides for First Choice and TNMP borrowing in accordance with its
terms following the acquisition completed on June 6, 2005.
\5\ On behalf of PNM Resources, TNMP notes that, at any given
time, some or all of its outstanding short-term notes will be
issuable in connection with the establishment of back-up credit
facilities pursuant to PNM Resources' commercial paper program but
that such credit facilities will not be drawn upon and no borrowings
will occur except in certain limited circumstances at which time
obligations under the related commercial paper will be paid. Thus,
short-term notes issued in connection with the establishment of
commercial paper back-up facilities backstop and duplicate
commercial paper issuances and should not be deemed to be borrowings
under TNMP or PNM Resources' financing authorization unless and
until an actual borrowing occurs under the related credit facility.
Any other result would ``double count'' PNM Resources' actual
financial obligation.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
B. Parameters for Financing Authorization
The following general terms would be applicable, as appropriate, to
the transactions requested to be authorized in the Declaration:
(1) Common Equity Ratio. Applicants state that each would at all
times maintain common equity (as reflected in its most recent Form 10-K
or Form 10-
[[Page 47873]]
Q filed with the Commission) of at least 30% of its consolidated
capitalization. The term ``consolidated capitalization'' is defined to
include, where applicable, all common stock equity (comprised of common
stock, additional paid in capital, retained earnings, accumulated other
comprehensive income or loss and/or treasury stock), minority
interests, preferred stock, preferred securities, equity linked
securities, long-term debt, short-term debt and current maturities.
(2) Investment Grade Ratings. With respect to the securities
issuance authority proposed in this Declaration: (a) Within four
business days after the occurrence of a Ratings Event,\6\ Applicants
would notify the Commission of its occurrence (by means of a letter,
via fax, email or overnight mail to the Office of Public Utility
Regulation); and (b) within 30 days after the occurrence of a Ratings
Event, Applicants would submit a post-effective amendment to the
Declaration explaining the material facts and circumstances relating to
that Ratings Event (including the basis on which, taking into account
the interests of investors, consumers and the public as well as other
applicable criteria under the Act, it remains appropriate for
Applicant(s) to issue the securities for which authorization has been
requested in this Declaration, so long as Applicant(s) continue to
comply with the other applicable terms and conditions specified in the
Commission's order authorizing the transactions requested in this
filing). Furthermore, no securities authorized as a result of this
Declaration would be issued following the 60th day after a Ratings
Event (other than common stock, commercial paper and short-term debt)
by any Applicant if the downgraded rating(s) has or have not been
upgraded to investment grade. Applicants request that the Commission
reserve jurisdiction through the remainder of the period authorized in
this filling over the issuance of any securities (other than common
stock, commercial paper and short-term notes) that Applicants are
prohibited from issuing as a result of the occurrence of a Ratings
Event if no revised rating reflecting an investment grade rating has
been issued.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ A ``Ratings Event'' would occur if, during the authorization
period requested in this filing, (i) any security issued by any
Applicant upon original issuance, if rated, is rated below
investment grade; or (ii) any outstanding security of any Applicant
that is rated is downgraded below investment grade. For purposes of
this provision, a security would be deemed to be rated ``investment
grade'' if it is rated investment grade by at least one nationally
recognized statistical rating organization, as that term is used in
paragraphs (c)(2)(vi)(E), (F) and (H) of rule 15c3-1 under the 1934
Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
(3) Effective Cost of Money on Financings. The effective cost of
capital would not exceed competitive market rates available at the time
of issuance for securities having the same or reasonably similar terms
and conditions issued by similar companies of reasonably comparable
credit quality; provided that in no event would the effective cost of
capital exceed 500 basis points over comparable term U.S. Treasury
securities (``Treasury Security'').
(4) Maturity. The final maturity of any long-term debt securities
would not exceed five years. Short-term debt incurred under the
Revolver would have a maturity of not to exceed one year.
(5) Issuance Expenses. The fees, commissions or other similar
remuneration paid in connection with the non-competitive issue, sale or
distribution of securities pursuant to this Declaration would not
exceed the competitive market rates which are consistent with similar
securities of comparable credit quality and maturities issued by other
companies, provided that in no event would such fees and expenses
exceed 500 basis points of the principal or face amount of the
securities being issued or the gross proceeds of the financing.
(6) Use of Proceeds. The proceeds from the borrowing would be used
for general corporate purposes including (i) the financing of working
capital requirements of the PNM Resources system, (ii) cash management
activities and (iii) other lawful purposes.
For the Commission, by the Division of Investment Management,
pursuant to delegated authority.
Jill M. Peterson,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. E5-4406 Filed 8-12-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-P