Stainless Steel Wire Rod From India: Amended Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 47177-47178 [05-16050]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 155 / Friday, August 12, 2005 / Notices
Final Results of Review
For these final results the Department
determines that the following weighted–
average margin percentage exists for the
period March 1, 2003 through February
29, 2004:
Manufacturer/Exporter
Margin (percent)
Baoding Mantong Fine
Chemistry Co., Ltd. ...
12.29%
Assessment of Antidumping Duties
Upon completion of this
administrative review, the Department
will determine, and U.S. Customs and
Border Protection (‘‘CBP’’) shall assess,
antidumping duties on all appropriate
entries. For assessment purposes, for
Baoding Mantong and all exporters
subject to the PRC–wide rate, the
Department will direct CBP to assess the
ad valorem rates against the entered
value of each entry of subject
merchandise during the period of
review. The Department will issue
appropriate assessment instructions
directly to CBP within 15 days of
publication of the final results of this
review.
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following deposit requirements
will be effective upon publication of
these final results for this administrative
review for all shipments of glycine from
the PRC entered, or withdrawn from
warehouse, for consumption on or after
the date of publication, as provided by
section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) The
cash deposit rate for the reviewed
company, Baoding Mantong, will be the
rate established above; (2) For
previously–reviewed PRC and non–PRC
exporters with separate rates, the cash
deposit rate will be the company–
specific rate established for the most
recent period; (3) For all other PRC
exporters, the cash deposit rate will be
the PRC–wide rate of 155.89 percent,
and (4) For all other non–PRC exporters
of the subject merchandise, the cash
deposit rate will be the rate applicable
to the PRC supplier of that exporter.
These deposit requirements shall
remain in effect until publication of the
final results of the next administrative
review. There are no changes to the
rates applicable to any other companies
under this antidumping duty order.
Notification to Interested Parties
This notice serves as a final reminder
to importers of their responsibility
under section 351.402(f) of the
Department’s regulations to file a
certificate regarding the reimbursement
of antidumping duties prior to
VerDate jul<14>2003
17:14 Aug 11, 2005
Jkt 205001
liquidation of the relevant entries
during this review period. Failure to
comply with this requirement could
result in the Secretary’s presumption
that reimbursement of antidumping
duties occurred and subsequent
assessment of double antidumping
duties.
This notice also serves as a reminder
to parties subject to administrative
protective order (‘‘APO’’) of their
responsibility concerning the
disposition of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance
with section 351.305(a)(3) of the
Department’s regulations. Timely
written notification of the return/
destruction of APO materials or
conversion to judicial protective order is
hereby requested. Failure to comply
with the regulations and the terms of an
APO is a sanctionable violation.
This administrative review and notice
are in accordance with sections
751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act.
Dated: August 5, 2005.
Joseph A. Spetrini,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration.
APPENDIX
Comment 1: Surrogate Value for
Aqueous Ammonia
Comment 2: Financial Ratios
Comment 3: By–Product Offset
Comment 4: Alleged Clerical Error
[FR Doc. 05–16051 Filed 8–11–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
A–533–808
Stainless Steel Wire Rod From India:
Amended Final Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review
Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On July 13, 2005, the
Department of Commerce published in
the Federal Register the final results of
the administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on stainless
steel wire rod from India. The period of
review is December 1, 2002, through
November 30, 2003. Based on the
correction of a ministerial error, we
have changed the antidumping margin
for Isibars Limited, and we are
amending our final results accordingly.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Jeffrey Frank at (202) 482–0090 or
Minoo Hatten at (202) 482–1690, AD/
AGENCY:
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
47177
CVD Operations, Office 5, Import
Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On July 13, 2005, the Department of
Commerce published in the Federal
Register the final results of the
administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on stainless
steel wire rod (SSWR) from India. See
Stainless Steel Wire Rod From India:
Final Results of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review and
Determination to Revoke Order in Part,
70 FR 40318 (July 13, 2005).
On July 19, 2005, we received a
timely ministerial–error allegation from
Carpenter Technology Corporation (the
petitioner) with respect to Isibars
Limited (Isibars). Specifically, the
petitioner argued that, in our margin
calculation, we did not distinguish sales
of prime merchandise from sales of
secondary merchandise for matching
purposes and, as a result, incorrectly
matched prime merchandise sold in the
United States with secondary
merchandise sold in India. Isibars did
not comment on this issue.
It is our practice to distinguish
between prime and secondary
merchandise. See Certain Cold–Rolled
and Corrosion–Resistant Carbon Steel
Flat Products From Korea: Final Results
of Antidumping Duty Administrative
Reviews, 65 FR 13359 (March 13, 2000)
and accompanying Issues and Decision
Memorandum at Comment 19. See also
Certain Corrosion–Resistant Carbon
Steel Flat Products From Canada: Final
Results of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review, 69 FR 2566
(January 16, 2004) and accompanying
Issues and Decision Memorandum at
Comment 8. Therefore, we agree with
the petitioner’s allegation and have
made the appropriate changes to our
calculation. See ‘‘Amended Final
Analysis Memorandum of Isibars
Limited for Stainless Steel Wire Rod
from India Adm. Rev. 12/1/02 - 11/30/
03’’ dated July 29, 2005.
Amended Final Results of Review
As a result of the correction of the
ministerial error, the weighted–average
margin for Isibars for the period
December 1, 2002, through November
30, 2003, has changed from 27.20
percent to 30.10 percent.
Cash–Deposit Requirements
The following deposit requirements
will be effective upon publication of
these amended final results of
E:\FR\FM\12AUN1.SGM
12AUN1
47178
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 155 / Friday, August 12, 2005 / Notices
administrative review for all shipments
of SSWR from India entered, or
withdrawn from warehouse, for
consumption on or after the publication
date of these amended final results, as
provided by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the
Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act):
(1) The cash–deposit rate for Isibars will
be 30.10 percent; (2) for merchandise
exported by other producers or
exporters that were reviewed or
investigated previously, the cash–
deposit rate will continue to be the most
recent rate published in the final
determination or final results for which
the producer or exporter received an
individual rate; (3) if the exporter is not
a firm covered in this review, a prior
review, or the original less–than-fair–
value (LTFV) investigation but the
manufacturer is, the cash–deposit rate
will be the rate established for the most
recent period for the manufacturer of
the subject merchandise; and (4) if
neither the exporter nor the
manufacturer is a firm covered in this or
any previous review, the cash–deposit
rate shall be 48.80 percent, the all–
others rate established in the LTFV
investigation. See Final Determination
of Sales at Less Than Fair Value:
Certain Stainless Steel Wire Rods from
India, 58 FR 54110 (October 20, 1993).
These deposit requirements shall
remain in effect until the publication of
the final results of the next
administrative review.
Duty Assessment
In accordance with 19 CFR
351.212(b)(1), we will direct U.S.
Customs and Border Protection to assess
the resulting per–unit dollar amount
against each unit of merchandise
entered or withdrawn from warehouse
for consumption during the review
period. We will issue the liquidation
instructions within 15 days of
publication of these amended final
results of review.
We are issuing and publishing these
results and notice in accordance with
sections 751(a)(1) and (h) and 777(i) of
the Act and 19 CFR 351.224(e).
Dated: August 5, 2005.
Joseph A. Spetrini,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration.
[FR Doc. 05–16050 Filed 8–11–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S
VerDate jul<14>2003
17:14 Aug 11, 2005
Jkt 205001
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–489–807]
Certain Steel Concrete Reinforcing
Bars from Turkey; Notice of Extension
of Time Limits for Final Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review
Import Administration, International
Trade Administration, Department of
Commerce.
EFFECTIVE DATE:
August 12, 2005.
Irina
Itkin or Greg Kalbaugh, AD/CVD
Operations, Office 2, Import
Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230;
telephone (202) 482–0656 and (202)
482–3693, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Background
The Department of Commerce (the
Department) published an antidumping
duty order on certain steel concrete
reinforcing bars (rebar) from Turkey on
April 17, 1997 (See Antidumpting Duty
Order: Certain Steel Concrete
Reinforcing Bars From Turkey, 62 FR
18748). On May 21, 2004, the
Department published a notice of
initiation of an administrative review of
the order on rebar from Turkey for the
period April 1, 2003, through March 31,
2004. See 69 FR 30282. The respondents
in this administrative review are:
Colakoglu Metalurji A.S.; Diler Demir
Celik Endustrisi ve Ticaret A.S., Yazici
Demir Celik Sanayi ve Ticaret A.S., and
Diler Dis Ticaret A.S. (collectively,
Diler); Habas Tibbi ve Sinai Gazlar
Istihsal Endustrisi A.S.; and ICDAS
Celik Enerji Tersane ve Ulasim Sanayi,
A.S. (ICDAS). On May 6, 2005, the
Department published in the Federal
Register its preliminary results. See
Certain Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bars
from Turkey; Preliminary Results and
Partial Rescission of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review and Notice of
Intent To Revoke in Part, 70 FR 23990.
The final results are currently due no
later than September 3, 2005.
Extension of the Time Limit for Final
Results of Administrative Review
Section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Tariff Act
of 1930, as amended (the Act) requires
the Department to make a final
determination in an administrative
review within 120 days after the date on
which the preliminary determination is
published. However, if it is not
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
practicable to complete the review
within this time period, section
751(a)(3)(A) of the Act allows the
Department to extend the time limit for
the final results to 180 days (or 300 days
if the Department does not extend the
time limit for the preliminary results)
from the date of publication of the
preliminary results.
In accordance with section
751(a)(3)(A) of the Act, and 19 CFR
351.213(h)(2), the Department finds that
it is not practicable to complete the
review within the original time frame
because it involves a number of
complicated issues for certain of the
respondents, including the
determination of the appropriate cost
averaging periods, date of sale, and
affiliated producers. Moreover, one
respondent, ICDAS, has requested
revocation in this review. Analysis of
these issues requires additional time.
Because it is not practicable to complete
this administrative review within the
time limit mandated by section
751(a)(3)(A) of the Act and 19 CFR
351.213(h)(2), the Department is fully
extending the time limit for completion
of the final results of this administrative
review to 180 days, until November 2,
2005.
This notice is issued and published in
accordance with section 751(a)(3)(A) of
the Act.
Dated: August 8, 2005.
Barbara E. Tillman,
Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration.
[FR Doc. E5–4386 Filed 8–11–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
Export Trade Certificate of Review
Notice of issuance of an
amended Export Trade Certificate of
Review, application no. 88–9A016.
ACTION:
SUMMARY: On August 8, 2005, The U.S.
Department of Commerce issued an
amended Export Trade Certificate of
Review to Wood Machinery
Manufacturers of America (‘‘WMMA’’).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Jeffrey C. Anspacher, Director, Export
Trading Company Affairs, International
Trade Administration, (202) 482–5131
(this is not a toll-free number) or E-mail
at oetca@ita.doc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Title III of
the Export Trading Company Act of
1982 (15 U.S.C. Sections 4001–21)
authorizes the Secretary of Commerce to
issue Export Trade Certificates of
E:\FR\FM\12AUN1.SGM
12AUN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 155 (Friday, August 12, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 47177-47178]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-16050]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
A-533-808
Stainless Steel Wire Rod From India: Amended Final Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review
AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On July 13, 2005, the Department of Commerce published in the
Federal Register the final results of the administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on stainless steel wire rod from India. The
period of review is December 1, 2002, through November 30, 2003. Based
on the correction of a ministerial error, we have changed the
antidumping margin for Isibars Limited, and we are amending our final
results accordingly.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jeffrey Frank at (202) 482-0090 or
Minoo Hatten at (202) 482-1690, AD/CVD Operations, Office 5, Import
Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC
20230.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On July 13, 2005, the Department of Commerce published in the
Federal Register the final results of the administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on stainless steel wire rod (SSWR) from India.
See Stainless Steel Wire Rod From India: Final Results of Antidumping
Duty Administrative Review and Determination to Revoke Order in Part,
70 FR 40318 (July 13, 2005).
On July 19, 2005, we received a timely ministerial-error allegation
from Carpenter Technology Corporation (the petitioner) with respect to
Isibars Limited (Isibars). Specifically, the petitioner argued that, in
our margin calculation, we did not distinguish sales of prime
merchandise from sales of secondary merchandise for matching purposes
and, as a result, incorrectly matched prime merchandise sold in the
United States with secondary merchandise sold in India. Isibars did not
comment on this issue.
It is our practice to distinguish between prime and secondary
merchandise. See Certain Cold-Rolled and Corrosion-Resistant Carbon
Steel Flat Products From Korea: Final Results of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Reviews, 65 FR 13359 (March 13, 2000) and accompanying
Issues and Decision Memorandum at Comment 19. See also Certain
Corrosion-Resistant Carbon Steel Flat Products From Canada: Final
Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 69 FR 2566 (January
16, 2004) and accompanying Issues and Decision Memorandum at Comment 8.
Therefore, we agree with the petitioner's allegation and have made the
appropriate changes to our calculation. See ``Amended Final Analysis
Memorandum of Isibars Limited for Stainless Steel Wire Rod from India
Adm. Rev. 12/1/02 - 11/30/03'' dated July 29, 2005.
Amended Final Results of Review
As a result of the correction of the ministerial error, the
weighted-average margin for Isibars for the period December 1, 2002,
through November 30, 2003, has changed from 27.20 percent to 30.10
percent.
Cash-Deposit Requirements
The following deposit requirements will be effective upon
publication of these amended final results of
[[Page 47178]]
administrative review for all shipments of SSWR from India entered, or
withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication
date of these amended final results, as provided by section
751(a)(2)(C) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act): (1) The
cash-deposit rate for Isibars will be 30.10 percent; (2) for
merchandise exported by other producers or exporters that were reviewed
or investigated previously, the cash-deposit rate will continue to be
the most recent rate published in the final determination or final
results for which the producer or exporter received an individual rate;
(3) if the exporter is not a firm covered in this review, a prior
review, or the original less-than-fair-value (LTFV) investigation but
the manufacturer is, the cash-deposit rate will be the rate established
for the most recent period for the manufacturer of the subject
merchandise; and (4) if neither the exporter nor the manufacturer is a
firm covered in this or any previous review, the cash-deposit rate
shall be 48.80 percent, the all-others rate established in the LTFV
investigation. See Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair
Value: Certain Stainless Steel Wire Rods from India, 58 FR 54110
(October 20, 1993). These deposit requirements shall remain in effect
until the publication of the final results of the next administrative
review.
Duty Assessment
In accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1), we will direct U.S.
Customs and Border Protection to assess the resulting per-unit dollar
amount against each unit of merchandise entered or withdrawn from
warehouse for consumption during the review period. We will issue the
liquidation instructions within 15 days of publication of these amended
final results of review.
We are issuing and publishing these results and notice in
accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and (h) and 777(i) of the Act and 19
CFR 351.224(e).
Dated: August 5, 2005.
Joseph A. Spetrini,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Import Administration.
[FR Doc. 05-16050 Filed 8-11-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-S
