Lands' End, a Subsidiary of Sears Roebuck and Company, Business Outfitters CAD Operations, Dodgeville, WI; Notice of Negative Determination on Reconsideration, 46190-46191 [E5-4292]
Download as PDF
46190
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 152 / Tuesday, August 9, 2005 / Notices
APPENDIX—Continued
Petitions instituted between 06/27/2005 and 07/01/2005
TA–W
Subject firm
(petitioners)
Location
57,457 ........
57,458 ........
57,459 ........
57,460 ........
57,461 ........
57,462 ........
57,463 ........
57,464 ........
57,465 ........
57,466 ........
57,467 ........
57,468 ........
57,469A ......
57,469 ........
57,470 ........
57,471 ........
57,472 ........
57,473 ........
57,474 ........
57,475 ........
57,476 ........
57,477 ........
57,478 ........
57,479 ........
57,480 ........
57,481 ........
57,482 ........
57,483 ........
57,484 ........
57,485 ........
57,486 ........
57,487 ........
57,488 ........
57,489 ........
57,490 ........
57,491 ........
57,492 ........
57,493 ........
57,494 ........
57,495 ........
57,496 ........
57,497 ........
57,498 ........
57,499 ........
57,500 ........
57,501 ........
TRW Automotive (Comp) ............................................................
Northern Technologies, Inc. (Comp) ...........................................
Cardinal Brands (Wkrs) ...............................................................
Alandale Knitting Co., Inc. (Comp) ..............................................
Elkin Printing Inc. (Comp) ............................................................
Kennametal Inc. (Comp) ..............................................................
Union Underwear Company, Inc. (Wkrs) ....................................
Delta Galil USA, Inc. (Comp) ......................................................
Premier Refracteries (Comp) .......................................................
Varco—Pruder Buildings (Wkrs) ..................................................
Texas Instruments (State) ...........................................................
Milwaukee Electric Tool Corp. (State) .........................................
NABCO, Inc. (Comp) ...................................................................
NABCO, Inc. (Comp) ...................................................................
Wilson Sporting Goods Co. (Comp) ............................................
Rohm and Haas Powder Coatings (Wkrs) ..................................
Kustom Fit (State) ........................................................................
Laneko (Comp) ............................................................................
Lund Boat Company (Comp) .......................................................
Onux Medical, Inc. (Comp) ..........................................................
Menasha Packaging Company (Comp) ......................................
Mount Vernon Mills, Inc. (Comp) .................................................
Thomasville Furniture Ind., Inc. (Comp) ......................................
Robert Bosch Tool Corp. (Comp) ................................................
Vishay Micro-Measurements (Comp) ..........................................
Crown City Plating Co. (Wkrs) ....................................................
Industrial Distribution Group (Comp) ...........................................
Bronze Craft Corp. (Comp) .........................................................
Oce Display Graphics Systems, Inc. (Comp) ..............................
Proman Mfg. Co. (Wkrs) ..............................................................
Homecrest Industries (State) .......................................................
Continental Tire North America (Comp) ......................................
Plastic Oddities, Inc. (Wkrs) ........................................................
APAC Customer Services (NPW) ...............................................
Teleflex Incorporated (Wkrs) .......................................................
Iberia Sugar Cooperative, Inc. (Comp) .......................................
Gilmour Mfg. Co. (Comp) ............................................................
Qualex (Wkrs) ..............................................................................
Toter, Inc. (Comp) .......................................................................
VMC—Volt (Wkrs) .......................................................................
Hermitage Hospital Products (State) ...........................................
FUN–TEES, Inc. (Comp) .............................................................
Custom Machine Works (State) ..................................................
National Spinning Co., LLC (Comp) ............................................
Amital Spinning Corp. (Comp) .....................................................
Unifi, Inc. (Comp) .........................................................................
Cookeville, TN ..........................
Liberty Lake, WA ......................
Washington, MO .......................
Troy, NC ...................................
Ronda, NC ................................
Latrobe, PA ...............................
Jamestown, KY .........................
Williamsport, PA .......................
Snow Shoe, PA ........................
Pine Bluff, AR ...........................
Tucson, AZ ...............................
Brookfield, WI ...........................
Marion, MI .................................
Kaleva, MI .................................
Humboldt, TN ...........................
Wytheville, VA ..........................
South Gate, CA ........................
Royersford, PA .........................
New York Mills, MN ..................
Hampton, NH ............................
Otsego, MI ................................
McCormick, SC .........................
Thomasville, NC .......................
Estanollee, GA ..........................
Wendell, NC .............................
El Monte, CA ............................
West Jefferson, NC ..................
Nashua, NH ..............................
San Jose, CA ...........................
Boston, MA ...............................
Wadena, MN .............................
Charlotte, NC ............................
Shelby, NC ...............................
Canton, IL .................................
Van Wert, OH ...........................
New Iberia, LA ..........................
Somerset, PA ...........................
Durham, NC ..............................
Sanger, CA ...............................
Portland, OR .............................
Niantic, CT ................................
Concord, NC .............................
Fayetteville, AR ........................
Warsaw, NC .............................
Wallace, NC ..............................
Reidsville, NC ...........................
[FR Doc. E5–4300 Filed 8–8–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–30–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
[TA–W–56,688]
Lands’ End, a Subsidiary of Sears
Roebuck and Company, Business
Outfitters CAD Operations, Dodgeville,
WI; Notice of Negative Determination
on Reconsideration
On June 6, 2005, the Department
issued an Affirmative Determination
Regarding Application for
VerDate jul<14>2003
15:52 Aug 08, 2005
Jkt 205001
Reconsideration for the workers and
former workers of the subject firm. The
notice was published in the Federal
Register on June 20, 2005 (70 FR 35456).
The Department denied Trade
Adjustment Assistance (TAA) and
Alternative Trade Adjustment
Assistance (ATAA) to workers of Lands’
End, a Subsidiary of Sears Roebuck and
Company, Business Outfitters CAD
Operations, Dodgeville, Wisconsin,
because the workers’ separations were
not due to a shift of production overseas
or increased imports of articles, but due
to the subject company’s decision to
move computer assisted design
operations abroad. The subject worker
group is engaged in computerizing
PO 00000
Frm 00059
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Date of
institution
Date of
petition
06/28/2005
06/28/2005
06/28/2005
06/28/2005
06/28/2005
06/28/2005
06/28/2005
06/29/2005
06/29/2005
06/29/2005
06/29/2005
06/29/2005
06/29/2005
06/29/2005
06/29/2005
06/29/2005
06/29/2005
06/29/2005
06/29/2005
06/29/2005
06/29/2005
06/29/2005
06/29/2005
06/29/2005
06/29/2005
06/29/2005
06/30/2005
06/30/2005
06/30/2005
06/30/2005
06/30/2005
06/30/2005
06/30/2005
06/30/2005
06/30/2005
06/30/2005
07/01/2005
07/01/2005
07/01/2005
07/01/2005
07/01/2005
07/01/2005
07/01/2005
07/01/2005
07/01/2005
07/01/2005
06/27/2005
06/28/2005
06/23/2005
06/22/2005
06/01/2005
06/24/2005
06/17/2005
06/28/2005
06/22/2005
06/24/2005
06/24/2005
06/24/2005
06/27/2005
06/27/2005
06/27/2005
06/27/2005
06/28/2005
06/23/2005
06/28/2005
06/27/2005
06/28/2005
06/28/2005
06/28/2005
06/24/2005
06/29/2005
06/15/2005
06/27/2005
06/12/2005
06/27/2005
06/24/2005
06/29/2005
06/23/2005
06/18/2005
06/21/2005
06/20/2005
06/20/2005
07/01/2005
06/26/2005
06/14/2005
06/29/2005
06/30/2005
06/29/2005
07/01/2005
06/30/2005
07/01/2005
07/01/2005
embroidery and logo designs which are
utilized by the production division of
Lands’ End, also located in Dodgeville,
Wisconsin. Workers in the Business
Outfitters CAD Operations are
separately identifiable from those
workers who produce embroidered
goods (clothing, tote bags, etc.) at Lands’
End, Dodgeville, Wisconsin.
In the request for reconsideration, the
petitioners alleged that workers produce
an article (digitized embroidery
designs), that digitized embroidery
design production shifted overseas, and
that imports of digitized embroidery
design increased.
During the reconsideration
investigation, the Department contacted
the petitioners and Lands’ End officials
E:\FR\FM\09AUN1.SGM
09AUN1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 152 / Tuesday, August 9, 2005 / Notices
to better understand the operations of
the subject worker group and to obtain
information which will enable the
Department to address the petitioners’
allegations.
According to the petitioners, the
workers use a computer program to
convert customers’ logos from a twodimensional form to one which is
readable by the embroidery machines at
the Dodgeville, Wisconsin facility.
Petitioners also allege that foreign
companies are digitizing the design
work, using a remote file transfer
protocol site and the Internet to receive
the logos from Lands’ End and to send
digitized logos back to Lands’ End. A
company official confirmed that the
electronic digitizing of embroidery logos
shifted overseas and that sample
stitching and the production of
embroidered goods remain at the
Dodgeville, Wisconsin facility.
Based on this information, the
Department has determined that the
subject workers do not produce an
article. As such, the second and third
allegations, the shift of digitized design
production abroad and the increased
imports of digitized designs, are
rendered moot.
During the reconsideration
investigation, the Department also
inquired into Lands’ End’s reasons for
shifting digitization of the designs
abroad and was informed that the
subject company wanted to utilize the
time difference between the countries in
order to more quickly satisfy customers’
demands for embroidered goods. By
doing so, the subject company can have
logos digitized ‘‘overnight’’ and be ready
to be used when the American
production workers return to work the
next day.
Conclusion
After review of the application and
investigative findings, I conclude that
there has been no error or
misinterpretation of the law or of the
facts which would justify
reconsideration of the Department of
Labor’s prior decision. Accordingly, the
application is denied.
Signed in Washington, DC, this 28th day of
July 2005.
Elliott S. Kushner,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade
Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E5–4292 Filed 8–8–05; 8:45 am]
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
Employment and Training
Administration
[TA–W–57,270]
[TA–W–57,504]
Menasha Holding Company, Menasha
Packaging Company, LLC, Danville,
VA; Notice of Termination of
Investigation
Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade
Act of 1974, an investigation was
initiated on July 5, 2005, in response to
a petition filed by a company official on
behalf of workers at Menasha Holding
Company, Menasha Packaging
Company, LLC, Danville, Virginia.
The petitioner has requested that the
petition be withdrawn. Consequently,
the investigation has been terminated.
Signed in Washington, DC, this 18th day of
July 2005.
Elliott S. Kushner,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade
Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E5–4301 Filed 8–8–05; 8:45 am]
15:52 Aug 08, 2005
Jkt 205001
TRW Automotive, Occupant Safety
Systems Division, El Paso Warehouse,
El Paso, TX; Notice of Termination of
Investigation
Pursuant to section 221 of the Trade
Act of 1974, as amended, an
investigation was initiated on June 1,
2005, in response to a petition filed by
a company official on behalf of workers
at TRW Automotive, Occupant Safety
Systems Division, El Paso Warehouse,
El Paso, Texas.
The company has requested that the
petition be withdrawn. Consequently,
the investigation has been terminated.
Signed in Washington, DC, this 11th day of
July 2005.
Richard Church,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade
Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E5–4297 Filed 8–8–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–30–P
BILLING CODE 4510–30–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
Employment and Training
Administration
[TA–W–56,946]
[TA–W–57,427]
Pomeroy Computer Resources, Macon,
Georgia; Notice of Termination of
Investigation
Pursuant to section 221 of the Trade
Act of 1974, an investigation was
initiated on June 21, 2005, in response
to petition filed on behalf of workers at
Pomeroy Computer Resources, Macon,
Georgia.
The petitioner has requested that the
petition be withdrawn. Consequently,
the investigation has been terminated.
Signed in Washington, DC, this 11th day of
July, 2005.
Richard Church,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade
Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E5–4299 Filed 8–8–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–30–P
BILLING CODE 4510–30–P
VerDate jul<14>2003
46191
PO 00000
Frm 00060
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
UITS Support Center, A Division Of
NBC Universal, Universal City, CA;
Notice of Negative Determination
Regarding Application for
Reconsideration
By application dated May 20, 2005, a
petitioner requested administrative
reconsideration of the Department’s
negative determination regarding
eligibility for workers and former
workers of the subject firm to apply for
Trade Adjustment Assistance (TAA).
The denial notice applicable to workers
of UITS Support Center, a division of
NBC Universal, Universal City,
California, was signed on April 21,
2005, and published in the Federal
Register on May 16, 2005 (70 FR 25859).
Pursuant to 29 CFR 90.18(c)
reconsideration may be granted under
the following circumstances:
(1) If it appears on the basis of facts
not previously considered that the
determination complained of was
erroneous;
(2) If it appears that the determination
complained of was based on a mistake
in the determination of facts not
previously considered; or
(3) If in the opinion of the Certifying
Officer, a mis-interpretation of facts or
E:\FR\FM\09AUN1.SGM
09AUN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 152 (Tuesday, August 9, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 46190-46191]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E5-4292]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training Administration
[TA-W-56,688]
Lands' End, a Subsidiary of Sears Roebuck and Company, Business
Outfitters CAD Operations, Dodgeville, WI; Notice of Negative
Determination on Reconsideration
On June 6, 2005, the Department issued an Affirmative Determination
Regarding Application for Reconsideration for the workers and former
workers of the subject firm. The notice was published in the Federal
Register on June 20, 2005 (70 FR 35456).
The Department denied Trade Adjustment Assistance (TAA) and
Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance (ATAA) to workers of Lands'
End, a Subsidiary of Sears Roebuck and Company, Business Outfitters CAD
Operations, Dodgeville, Wisconsin, because the workers' separations
were not due to a shift of production overseas or increased imports of
articles, but due to the subject company's decision to move computer
assisted design operations abroad. The subject worker group is engaged
in computerizing embroidery and logo designs which are utilized by the
production division of Lands' End, also located in Dodgeville,
Wisconsin. Workers in the Business Outfitters CAD Operations are
separately identifiable from those workers who produce embroidered
goods (clothing, tote bags, etc.) at Lands' End, Dodgeville, Wisconsin.
In the request for reconsideration, the petitioners alleged that
workers produce an article (digitized embroidery designs), that
digitized embroidery design production shifted overseas, and that
imports of digitized embroidery design increased.
During the reconsideration investigation, the Department contacted
the petitioners and Lands' End officials
[[Page 46191]]
to better understand the operations of the subject worker group and to
obtain information which will enable the Department to address the
petitioners' allegations.
According to the petitioners, the workers use a computer program to
convert customers' logos from a two-dimensional form to one which is
readable by the embroidery machines at the Dodgeville, Wisconsin
facility. Petitioners also allege that foreign companies are digitizing
the design work, using a remote file transfer protocol site and the
Internet to receive the logos from Lands' End and to send digitized
logos back to Lands' End. A company official confirmed that the
electronic digitizing of embroidery logos shifted overseas and that
sample stitching and the production of embroidered goods remain at the
Dodgeville, Wisconsin facility.
Based on this information, the Department has determined that the
subject workers do not produce an article. As such, the second and
third allegations, the shift of digitized design production abroad and
the increased imports of digitized designs, are rendered moot.
During the reconsideration investigation, the Department also
inquired into Lands' End's reasons for shifting digitization of the
designs abroad and was informed that the subject company wanted to
utilize the time difference between the countries in order to more
quickly satisfy customers' demands for embroidered goods. By doing so,
the subject company can have logos digitized ``overnight'' and be ready
to be used when the American production workers return to work the next
day.
Conclusion
After review of the application and investigative findings, I
conclude that there has been no error or misinterpretation of the law
or of the facts which would justify reconsideration of the Department
of Labor's prior decision. Accordingly, the application is denied.
Signed in Washington, DC, this 28th day of July 2005.
Elliott S. Kushner,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E5-4292 Filed 8-8-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-P