Self-Regulatory Organizations; Fixed Income Clearing Corporation; Order Granting Approval of a Proposed Rule Change Relating to the Collecting of Fees for Services Provided by Other Entities, 44413 [E5-4112]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 147 / Tuesday, August 2, 2005 / Notices
DTCC and third party that is not a
registered clearing agency.
FICC’s rules currently allow for fee
collection arrangements with respect to
collection of fees from members. The
proposed rule change further clarifies
this practice and facilitates collection of
fees with respect to affiliates of
members.3 FICC will enter into
appropriate agreements with such
subsidiaries and others regarding the
collection of fees.
and lending and extending credit to
other nonutility money pool
participants.
For the Commission by the Division of
Investment Management, pursuant to
delegated authority.
Margaret H. McFarland,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. E5–4110 Filed 8–1–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
III. Discussion
[Release No. 34–52124; File No. SR–FICC–
2005–09]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Fixed
Income Clearing Corporation; Order
Granting Approval of a Proposed Rule
Change Relating to the Collecting of
Fees for Services Provided by Other
Entities
July 26, 2005.
I. Introduction
On May 3, 2005, Fixed Income
Clearing Corporation (‘‘FICC’’) filed
with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (‘‘Commission’’) proposed
rule change SR–FICC–2005–09 pursuant
to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (‘‘Act’’).1 Notice
of the proposal was published in the
Federal Register on June 13, 2005.2 No
comment letters were received. For the
reasons discussed below, the
Commission is granting approval of the
proposed rule change.
II. Description
The proposed rule change amends
FICC’s rules to allow FICC to collect fees
for services provided by unregulated
subsidiaries of The Depository Trust
and Clearing Corporation (‘‘DTCC’’ and
by other entities. FICC is a subsidiary of
DTCC. Members of FICC and their
affiliates may from time to time utilize
the services of DTCC subsidiaries that
are not registered as clearing agencies
with the Commission. Such subsidiaries
include Global Asset Solutions LLC and
DTCC Deriv/Serv LLC. In addition,
members of FICC and their affiliates
may utilize the services of other third
parties. FICC has determined that it
would be more efficient and less costly
if the fees that members agree to pay for
such services were collected by FICC
rather than through independent billing
mechanisms that would otherwise have
to be established by each subsidiary of
1 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
Exchange Act Release No. 51789,
(June 6, 2005), 70 FR 34169.
2 Securities
VerDate jul<14>2003
17:21 Aug 01, 2005
Jkt 205001
Section 17A(a)(1)(B) of the Act
provides that inefficient procedures for
clearance and settlement impose
unnecessary costs on investors and
persons facilitating transactions by and
acting on behalf of investors.4 Although
the services provided by unregulated
DTCC subsidiaries and by other third
parties are not core clearance and
settlement services, they are related to
the clearance and settlement operations
of FICC and of its members. By
streamlining the fee collection process
for these services so that FICC’s
members will pay these fees to FICC as
a part of their normal monthly FICC
bills, the proposed rule change should
help to improve efficiency in the
operations of FICC members and
thereby should remove unnecessary cost
for FICC members and for the persons
(i.e., the DTCC subsidiaries and the
other entities providing services to FICC
members) facilitating transactions by
and acting on behalf of investors.
Accordingly, the Commission finds that
the proposed rule change is consistent
with the requirements of section 17A of
the Act.
IV. Conclusion
On the basis of the foregoing, the
Commission finds that the proposed
rule change is consistent with the
requirements of the Act and in
particular section 17A of the Act and
the rules and regulations thereunder.
It is therefore ordered, pursuant to
section 19(b)(2) of the Act, that the
proposed rule change (File No. SR–
FICC–2005–09) be and hereby is
approved.
For the Commission by the Division of
Market Regulation, pursuant to delegated
authority.5
Margaret H. McFarland,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. E5–4112 Filed 8–1–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-52133; File No. SR–NASD–
2005–068]
Self-Regulatory Organizations;
National Association of Securities
Dealers, Inc.; Order Approving
Proposed Rule Change Regarding a
New Order Type for the Pre-Market
Trading Session
July 27, 2005.
On May 25, 2005, the National
Association of Securities Dealers, Inc.,
through its subsidiary, The Nasdaq
Stock Market, Inc. (‘‘Nasdaq’’), filed
with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (‘‘Commission’’) a
proposed rule change pursuant to
Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule
19b–4 thereunder,2 to establish a new
order type for Nasdaq-listed securities
called the Total Good-till-Canceled
order, which would be eligible for
execution during the pre-market trading
session and would be processed
precisely as the Good-till-Canceled
order. The proposed rule change was
published for comment in the Federal
Register on June 23, 2005.3 The
Commission received no comments on
the proposal. This order approves the
proposed rule change.
The Commission finds that the
proposed rule change is consistent with
the requirements of the Act and the
rules and regulations thereunder
applicable to a national securities
association,4 the requirements of
Section 15A of the Act,5 in general, and
Section 15A(b)(6) of the Act,6 in
particular, which requires, among other
things, that the rules of a national
securities association be designed to
facilitate transactions in securities and
to remove impediments to and perfect
the mechanism of a free and open
5 17
currently has such fee collection
arrangements with The Bond Market Association
(‘‘TMBA’’) pursuant to specific rules provisions.
FICC continues to collect fees on behalf of TBMA;
however, pursuant to this filing, the existing rules
provisions which govern the TBMA arrangement
will be replaced with broader language intended to
cover all such fee collection arrangements entered
into by FICC.
4 15 U.S.C. 78q–1(a)(A)(B).
PO 00000
3 FICC
Frm 00091
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
44413
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
3 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 51859
(June 16, 2005), 70 FR 36428.
4 In approving the proposed rule change, the
Commission has considered its impact on
efficiency, competition, and capital formation. 15
U.S.C. 78c(f).
5 15 U.S.C. 78o–3.
6 15 U.S.C. 78o–3(b)(6).
1 15
E:\FR\FM\02AUN1.SGM
02AUN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 147 (Tuesday, August 2, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 44413]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E5-4112]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-52124; File No. SR-FICC-2005-09]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Fixed Income Clearing Corporation;
Order Granting Approval of a Proposed Rule Change Relating to the
Collecting of Fees for Services Provided by Other Entities
July 26, 2005.
I. Introduction
On May 3, 2005, Fixed Income Clearing Corporation (``FICC'') filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission'') proposed
rule change SR-FICC-2005-09 pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (``Act'').\1\ Notice of the proposal
was published in the Federal Register on June 13, 2005.\2\ No comment
letters were received. For the reasons discussed below, the Commission
is granting approval of the proposed rule change.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ Securities Exchange Act Release No. 51789, (June 6, 2005),
70 FR 34169.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
II. Description
The proposed rule change amends FICC's rules to allow FICC to
collect fees for services provided by unregulated subsidiaries of The
Depository Trust and Clearing Corporation (``DTCC'' and by other
entities. FICC is a subsidiary of DTCC. Members of FICC and their
affiliates may from time to time utilize the services of DTCC
subsidiaries that are not registered as clearing agencies with the
Commission. Such subsidiaries include Global Asset Solutions LLC and
DTCC Deriv/Serv LLC. In addition, members of FICC and their affiliates
may utilize the services of other third parties. FICC has determined
that it would be more efficient and less costly if the fees that
members agree to pay for such services were collected by FICC rather
than through independent billing mechanisms that would otherwise have
to be established by each subsidiary of DTCC and third party that is
not a registered clearing agency.
FICC's rules currently allow for fee collection arrangements with
respect to collection of fees from members. The proposed rule change
further clarifies this practice and facilitates collection of fees with
respect to affiliates of members.\3\ FICC will enter into appropriate
agreements with such subsidiaries and others regarding the collection
of fees.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ FICC currently has such fee collection arrangements with The
Bond Market Association (``TMBA'') pursuant to specific rules
provisions. FICC continues to collect fees on behalf of TBMA;
however, pursuant to this filing, the existing rules provisions
which govern the TBMA arrangement will be replaced with broader
language intended to cover all such fee collection arrangements
entered into by FICC.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
III. Discussion
Section 17A(a)(1)(B) of the Act provides that inefficient
procedures for clearance and settlement impose unnecessary costs on
investors and persons facilitating transactions by and acting on behalf
of investors.\4\ Although the services provided by unregulated DTCC
subsidiaries and by other third parties are not core clearance and
settlement services, they are related to the clearance and settlement
operations of FICC and of its members. By streamlining the fee
collection process for these services so that FICC's members will pay
these fees to FICC as a part of their normal monthly FICC bills, the
proposed rule change should help to improve efficiency in the
operations of FICC members and thereby should remove unnecessary cost
for FICC members and for the persons (i.e., the DTCC subsidiaries and
the other entities providing services to FICC members) facilitating
transactions by and acting on behalf of investors. Accordingly, the
Commission finds that the proposed rule change is consistent with the
requirements of section 17A of the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ 15 U.S.C. 78q-1(a)(A)(B).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
IV. Conclusion
On the basis of the foregoing, the Commission finds that the
proposed rule change is consistent with the requirements of the Act and
in particular section 17A of the Act and the rules and regulations
thereunder.
It is therefore ordered, pursuant to section 19(b)(2) of the Act,
that the proposed rule change (File No. SR-FICC-2005-09) be and hereby
is approved.
For the Commission by the Division of Market Regulation,
pursuant to delegated authority.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Margaret H. McFarland,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. E5-4112 Filed 8-1-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-P