Certain Preserved Mushrooms from India: Notice of Partial Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 40982-40983 [E5-3778]

Download as PDF 40982 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 135 / Friday, July 15, 2005 / Notices DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–485–806] Notice of Final Results of Antidumping Duty Changed–Circumstances Review: Certain Hot–Rolled Carbon Steel Flat Products from Romania Import Administration, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: On May 13, 2005, the Department of Commerce (the Department) published a notice of initiation and the preliminary results of its changed–circumstances review of the antidumping duty order on certain hot–rolled carbon steel flat products from Romania in which it preliminarily determined that Mittal Steel Galati S.A. (Mittal Steel) is the successor–in-interest to S.C. Ispat Sidex S.A. (Sidex). See Certain Hot–Rolled Carbon Steel Flat Products from Romania: Initiation and Preliminary Results of Changed–Circumstances Review, 70 FR 25547 (May 13, 2005). We gave interested parties the opportunity to comment. We received no comments. Therefore, for these final results, the Department is adopting its preliminary determination that Mittal Steel is the successor–in-interest to Sidex. EFFECTIVE DATE: July 15, 2005. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dunyako Ahmadu at (202) 482–0198 or Dave Dirstine at (202) 482–4033, AD/ CVD Operations, Office 5, Import Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background On November 29, 2001, the Department published in the Federal Register an antidumping duty order on certain hot–rolled carbon steel flat products from Romania. See Notice of Amended Final Antidumping Duty Determination and Antidumping Duty Order: Certain Hot–Rolled Carbon Steel Flat Products from Romania, 66 FR 59566 (November 29, 2001). Since publication, there have been two administrative reviews of this order. Sidex was a participant in both administrative reviews. In a letter dated March 24, 2005, Sidex informed the Department that on February 7, 2005, it changed its corporate name to Mittal Steel Galati, S.A. (Mittal Steel), following the approval of the name change by Sidex’s general meeting of VerDate jul<14>2003 17:47 Jul 14, 2005 Jkt 205001 shareholders on January 10, 2005. Sidex provided record evidence indicating that the name change was unconditionally recorded and approved by the Trade Register Office of the Galati Tribunal and the National Office of the Trade Registry, a bureau of the Romanian Ministry of Justice, on February 7, 2005. As such, Sidex requested that the Department initiate a changed–circumstances review to confirm that Mittal Steel is the successor–in-interest to Sidex for purposes of determining antidumping– duty liabilities. Sidex also requested that the Department conduct a changed– circumstances review on an expedited basis, pursuant to 19 CFR 351.221(c)(3)(ii). Because the record evidence supporting Sidex’s claim was sufficient, the Department found that an expedited review was practicable and, on May 13, 2005, issued a combined notice of initiation with the preliminary results. See Certain Hot–Rolled Carbon Steel Flat Products from Romania: Initiation and Preliminary Results of Changed– Circumstances Review, 70 FR 25547 (May 13, 2005) (Preliminary Results). In its Preliminary Results, the Department provided the interested parties with an opportunity to comment or request a public hearing regarding the Department’s finding that Mittal Steel is the successor–in-interest to Sidex. We did not receive any comments or any requests for a public hearing. Scope of the Order For purposes of the order, the products covered include hot–rolled carbon steel flat products. For a complete description of the scope of the order, see Certain Hot–Rolled Carbon Steel Flat Products from Romania: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 69 FR 70644 (December 7, 2004). Final Results of Changed– Circumstances Review For the reasons stated in the Preliminary Results and because we received no comments to the contrary, we continue to find that Mittal Steel is the successor–in-interest to Sidex. We will instruct U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to apply the cash– deposit rate in effect for Sidex to all entries of the subject merchandise from Mittal Steel that were entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the date of publication of the final results of this changed–circumstances review. See Granular Polytetrafluoroethylene Resin from Italy: Final Results of Antidumping PO 00000 Frm 00008 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 Duty Changed Circumstances Review, 68 FR 25327 (May 12, 2003). This determination and this notice are in accordance with sections 751(b)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.216. Dated: July 11, 2005. Susan H. Kuhbach, Acting Assistant Secretary for Import Administration. [FR Doc. E5–3779 Filed 7–14–05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–533–813] Certain Preserved Mushrooms from India: Notice of Partial Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review Import Administration, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. EFFECTIVE DATE: July 15, 2005. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: David J. Goldberger or Kate Johnson, Import Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20230; telephone: (202) 482–4136 or (202) 482–4929, respectively. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background On February 1, 2005, the Department published in the Federal Register (70 FR 5136) a notice of ‘‘Opportunity To Request Administrative Review’’ of the antidumping duty order on certain preserved mushrooms from India for the period February 1, 2004, through January 31, 2005. On February 25, 2005, Agro Dutch Industries, Ltd. (Agro Dutch) requested an administrative review of its sales. On February 27, 2005, the petitioner1 requested an administrative review of the antidumping duty order for the following companies: Agro Dutch, Alpine Biotech Ltd. (Alpine Biotech), Dinesh Agro Products, Ltd. (Dinesh Agro), Flex Foods, Ltd. (Flex Foods), Himalya International, Ltd. (Himalya), Hindustan Lever Limited (Hindustan), KICM (Madras) Ltd. (KICM), Mandeep Mushrooms Ltd. (Mandeep), Premier Mushroom Farms (Premier), Saptarishi 1 The petitioner is the Coalition for Fair Preserved Mushroom Trade which includes: L.K. Bowman, Inc., Monterey Mushrooms, Inc., Mushroom Canning Company, and Sunny Dell Foods, Inc. E:\FR\FM\15JYN1.SGM 15JYN1 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 135 / Friday, July 15, 2005 / Notices Agro Industries Ltd. (Saptarishi Agro), Transchem Ltd. (Transchem), Techtran Agro Industries Limited (Techtran) and Weikfield Agro Products Ltd. (Weikfield). On March 23, 2005, the Department published a notice of initiation of an administrative review of the antidumping duty order on certain preserved mushrooms from India with respect to these companies. See Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews and Requests for Revocation in Part, 70 FR 14643. On May 6, 2005, the petitioner timely withdrew its request for review with respect to KICM. On June 17, 2005, the petitioner requested that the Department extend the deadline established under 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1) to withdraw its request for review of other companies until July 5, 2005. On June 21, 2005, we granted this request. On June 29, 2005, the petitioner withdrew its request for review with respect to Alpine Biotech, Dinesh Agro, Flex Foods, Himalya, Hindustan, Mandeep, Premier, Saptarishi Agro, Transchem, Techtran and Weikfield. Partial Rescission of Review Section 351.213(d)(1) of the Department’s regulations stipulates that the Secretary will rescind an administrative review, in whole or in part, if a party that requested a review withdraws the request within 90 days of the date of publication of notice of initiation of the requested review, unless the Secretary decides that it is reasonable to extend this time limit. In this case, the petitioner withdrew its request for review of Alpine Biotech, Dinesh Agro, Flex Foods, Himalya, Hindustan, KICM, Mandeep, Premier, Saptarishi Agro, Transchem, Techtran and Weikfield within the extended time limit. Therefore, because the petitioner was the only party to request the administrative review of these companies, we are rescinding, in part, this review of the antidumping duty order on certain preserved mushrooms from India as to Alpine Biotech, Dinesh Agro, Flex Foods, Himalya, Hindustan, KICM, Mandeep, Premier, Saptarishi Agro2, Transchem, Techtran and Weikfield. This review will continue with respect to Agro Dutch. 2 On March 25, 2005, Agro Dutch stated that it had purchased the mushroom operations of Saptarishi Agro prior to the current review period. Therefore, any sales made by Saptarishi Agro during the current review period will be examined in the context of the administrative review of Agro Dutch. VerDate jul<14>2003 17:47 Jul 14, 2005 Jkt 205001 Assessment The Department will instruct U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to assess antidumping duties on all appropriate entries. Antidumping duties for these rescinded companies shall be assessed at rates equal to the cash deposit of estimated antidumping duties required at the time of entry, or withdrawal from warehouse, for consumption, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(c)(1)(i). The Department will issue appropriate assessment instructions directly to CBP within 15 days of publication of this notice. This notice is published in accordance with section 751 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and 19 CFR 351.213(d)(4). Dated: July 11, 2005. Susan H. Kuhbach, Acting Assistant Secretary for Import Administration. [FR Doc. E5–3778 Filed 7–14–05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE: 3510–DS–S 40983 Director of the National Institute of Standards and Technology to assure a balanced membership that will reflect the wide diversity of technical disciplines and industrial sectors represented in ATP projects. The Committee will function solely as an advisory body and in compliance with the provisions of the Federal Advisory Committee Act. Copies of the Committee’s revised charter will be filed with the appropriate committees of the Congress and with the Library of Congress. Inquiries or comments may be directed to Janet Brumby, Advanced Technology Program, National Institute of Standards and Technology, 100 Bureau Drive, Stop 4710, Gaithersburg, Maryland 20899–4710; telephone: 301– 975–3189. Dated: July 7, 2005. Hratch G. Semerjian, Acting Director, NIST. [FR Doc. 05–13993 Filed 7–14–05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–13–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE National Institute of Standards and Technology Advanced Technology Program (ATP) Advisory Committee National Institute of Standards and Technology, Department of Commerce. ACTION: Notice of renewal. AGENCY: In accordance with the provisions of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. 2, and the General Services Administration (GSA) rule on Federal Advisory Committee Management, 41 CFR Part 101–6, and after consultation with GSA, the Secretary of Commerce has determined that the renewal of the Advanced Technology Program Advisory Committee is in the public interest in connection with the performance of the duties imposed on the Department by law. The Committee was first established in July 1999 to advise ATP regarding their programs, plans, and policies. In renewing the Committee, the Secretary has established it for an additional six months. During the next six months, the Committee plans to provide advice on ATP programs, plans and policies, review ATP’s efforts to assess the economic impact of the program, and report on the general health of the program and its effectiveness in achieving its legislatively mandated mission. The Committee will consist of 6 to 12 members to be appointed by the PO 00000 Frm 00009 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE National Institute of Standards and Technology [Docket No. 060601149–5149–01] Announcing Draft Federal Information Processing Standard (FIPS) Publication 200, Minimum Security Requirements for Federal Information and Information Systems National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), Commerce. ACTION: Notice; request for comments. AGENCY: SUMMARY: The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) announces the release of draft Federal Information Processing Standards (FIPS) Publication 200, Minimum Security Requirements for Federal Information and Information Systems for public comment. Draft FIPS Publication 200 is one of a series of security standards and guidelines that NIST is developing to help federal agencies implement their responsibilities under the Federal Information Security Management Act (FISMA). The FISMA requires that all federal agencies develop, document and implement agency-wide information security programs to protect federal information and information systems. Draft FIPS Publication 200, which will be used with other publications already issued by NIST, specifies minimum security requirements for federal information and information systems and a risk-based process for selecting E:\FR\FM\15JYN1.SGM 15JYN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 135 (Friday, July 15, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 40982-40983]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E5-3778]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-533-813]


Certain Preserved Mushrooms from India: Notice of Partial 
Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review

    Import Administration, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

EFFECTIVE DATE: July 15, 2005.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: David J. Goldberger or Kate Johnson, 
Import Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S. 
Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue, N.W., 
Washington, D.C. 20230; telephone: (202) 482-4136 or (202) 482-4929, 
respectively.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    On February 1, 2005, the Department published in the Federal 
Register (70 FR 5136) a notice of ``Opportunity To Request 
Administrative Review'' of the antidumping duty order on certain 
preserved mushrooms from India for the period February 1, 2004, through 
January 31, 2005. On February 25, 2005, Agro Dutch Industries, Ltd. 
(Agro Dutch) requested an administrative review of its sales. On 
February 27, 2005, the petitioner\1\ requested an administrative review 
of the antidumping duty order for the following companies: Agro Dutch, 
Alpine Biotech Ltd. (Alpine Biotech), Dinesh Agro Products, Ltd. 
(Dinesh Agro), Flex Foods, Ltd. (Flex Foods), Himalya International, 
Ltd. (Himalya), Hindustan Lever Limited (Hindustan), KICM (Madras) Ltd. 
(KICM), Mandeep Mushrooms Ltd. (Mandeep), Premier Mushroom Farms 
(Premier), Saptarishi

[[Page 40983]]

Agro Industries Ltd. (Saptarishi Agro), Transchem Ltd. (Transchem), 
Techtran Agro Industries Limited (Techtran) and Weikfield Agro Products 
Ltd. (Weikfield). On March 23, 2005, the Department published a notice 
of initiation of an administrative review of the antidumping duty order 
on certain preserved mushrooms from India with respect to these 
companies. See Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 
Administrative Reviews and Requests for Revocation in Part, 70 FR 
14643.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ The petitioner is the Coalition for Fair Preserved Mushroom 
Trade which includes: L.K. Bowman, Inc., Monterey Mushrooms, Inc., 
Mushroom Canning Company, and Sunny Dell Foods, Inc.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    On May 6, 2005, the petitioner timely withdrew its request for 
review with respect to KICM. On June 17, 2005, the petitioner requested 
that the Department extend the deadline established under 19 CFR 
351.213(d)(1) to withdraw its request for review of other companies 
until July 5, 2005. On June 21, 2005, we granted this request. On June 
29, 2005, the petitioner withdrew its request for review with respect 
to Alpine Biotech, Dinesh Agro, Flex Foods, Himalya, Hindustan, 
Mandeep, Premier, Saptarishi Agro, Transchem, Techtran and Weikfield.

Partial Rescission of Review

    Section 351.213(d)(1) of the Department's regulations stipulates 
that the Secretary will rescind an administrative review, in whole or 
in part, if a party that requested a review withdraws the request 
within 90 days of the date of publication of notice of initiation of 
the requested review, unless the Secretary decides that it is 
reasonable to extend this time limit. In this case, the petitioner 
withdrew its request for review of Alpine Biotech, Dinesh Agro, Flex 
Foods, Himalya, Hindustan, KICM, Mandeep, Premier, Saptarishi Agro, 
Transchem, Techtran and Weikfield within the extended time limit. 
Therefore, because the petitioner was the only party to request the 
administrative review of these companies, we are rescinding, in part, 
this review of the antidumping duty order on certain preserved 
mushrooms from India as to Alpine Biotech, Dinesh Agro, Flex Foods, 
Himalya, Hindustan, KICM, Mandeep, Premier, Saptarishi Agro\2\, 
Transchem, Techtran and Weikfield. This review will continue with 
respect to Agro Dutch.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ On March 25, 2005, Agro Dutch stated that it had purchased 
the mushroom operations of Saptarishi Agro prior to the current 
review period. Therefore, any sales made by Saptarishi Agro during 
the current review period will be examined in the context of the 
administrative review of Agro Dutch.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Assessment

    The Department will instruct U.S. Customs and Border Protection 
(CBP) to assess antidumping duties on all appropriate entries. 
Antidumping duties for these rescinded companies shall be assessed at 
rates equal to the cash deposit of estimated antidumping duties 
required at the time of entry, or withdrawal from warehouse, for 
consumption, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(c)(1)(i). The Department 
will issue appropriate assessment instructions directly to CBP within 
15 days of publication of this notice.
    This notice is published in accordance with section 751 of the 
Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and 19 CFR 351.213(d)(4).

    Dated: July 11, 2005.
Susan H. Kuhbach,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Import Administration.
[FR Doc. E5-3778 Filed 7-14-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE: 3510-DS-S

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.