Final Results of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review: Low Enriched Uranium from France, 39998-40000 [E5-3687]

Download as PDF 39998 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 132 / Tuesday, July 12, 2005 / Notices merchandise, we will order CBP to terminate the suspension of liquidation for exports of such merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after February 1, 2004, and to refund all cash deposits collected for such unliquidated entries. The following deposit requirements will be effective upon publication of this notice of final results of administrative review for all shipments of the subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication, as provided by section 751(a)(1) of the Tariff Act: (1) Since the margin for Echjay was less than 0.50 percent, and hence de minimis, no cash deposit shall be required for Echjay; (2) for previously reviewed or investigated companies not listed above, the cash deposit will continue to be the company-specific rate published for the most recent period; (3) if the exporter is not a firm covered in this review, a prior review, or the original investigation, but the Final Results of Review manufacturer is, the cash deposit rate will be that established for the most As a result of our review, we recent period for the manufacturer of determine the weighted-average the merchandise; and (4) if neither the dumping margins for the period exporter nor the manufacturer is a firm February 1, 2003, through January 31, covered in this review, any previous 2004, to be as follows: reviews, or the LTFV investigation, the cash deposit rate will be 162.14 percent, Margin Manufacturer/exporter (percent) the ‘‘all others’’ rate established in the LTFV investigation. See Amended Final Echjay Forgings Pvt., Ltd ............. 0.03 Determination and Antidumping Duty Viraj Forgings, Ltd ........................ 0.01 Order; Certain Forged Stainless Steel Flanges from India; 59 FR 5994 The Department will determine, and (February 9, 1994). CBP shall assess, antidumping duties on These deposit requirements, when all appropriate entries. We have imposed, shall remain in effect until calculated importer-specific duty publication of the final results of the assessment rates for the merchandise in next administrative review. question based on the ratio of the total Notification of Interested Parties amount of antidumping duties calculated for the examined sales to the This notice also serves as a reminder total entered value of those sales. to importers of their responsibility Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.106(c)(2), we under 19 CFR 351.402(f) to file a will instruct CBP to liquidate without certificate regarding the reimbursement regard to antidumping duties any of antidumping duties or countervailing entries for which the assessment rate is duties prior to liquidation of the de minimis (i.e., less than 0.50 percent). relevant entries during this review To determine whether the duty period. Failure to comply with this assessment rates were de minimis, we requirement could result in the calculated importer-specific ad valorem Secretary’s presumption that ratios based on export prices. We will reimbursement of antidumping duties or direct CBP to assess the resulting countervailing duties occurred and the assessment rates uniformly on all subsequent assessment of double entries of that particular importer made antidumping duties or countervailing during the period of review. The duties. This notice also serves as a reminder Department will issue assessment to parties subject to administrative instructions directly to CBP within 15 days of publication of these final results protective orders (APOs) or their responsibility concerning the return or of review. destruction of proprietary information Cash Deposit Requirements disclosed under APO in accordance Because we have revoked the order with 19 CFR 351.305, which continues with respect to Viraj’s exports of subject to govern business proprietary in the ‘‘Issues and Decision Memorandum’’ (Decision Memorandum) from Barbara E. Tillman, Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary, Import Administration, to Joseph A. Spetrini, Acting Assistant Secretary for Import Administration, dated July 5, 2005, which is hereby adopted by this notice. A list of the issues which parties have raised and to which we have responded, all of which are in the Decision Memorandum, is attached to this notice as an appendix. Parties can find a complete discussion of all issues raised in this review and the corresponding recommendations in this public memorandum which is on file in the Central Records Unit, room B–099 of the main Department of Commerce building. In addition, a complete version of the decision memorandum can be accessed directly on the Web at http://ia.ita.doc.gov/. The paper copy and electronic version of the decision memorandum are identical in content. VerDate jul<14>2003 16:15 Jul 11, 2005 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00012 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 information in this segment of the proceeding. Timely written notification of the return/destruction of APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO is a violation which is subject to sanction. We are issuing and publishing this notice in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(I) of the Tariff Act. Dated: July 5, 2005. Barbara E. Tillman, Acting Assistant Secretary for Import Administration. Appendix—Issues Raised in Decision Memorandum Comment 1: Assignment of Antidumping Rate to Exporter As Well As Manufacturer [FR Doc. E5–3688 Filed 7–11–05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration (C–427–819) Final Results of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review: Low Enriched Uranium from France Import Administration, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: On March 7, 2005, the Department of Commerce (the Department) published in the Federal Register its preliminary results of administrative review of the countervailing duty (CVD) order on low enriched uranium from France for the period January 1, 2003, through December 31, 2003 (see Preliminary Results of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review: Low Enriched Uranium from France, 70 FR 10989 (March 7, 2005) (LEU Preliminary Results 2003)). The Department has now completed the administrative review in accordance with section 751(a) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). Based on our analysis of the comments received, the Department has not revised the net subsidy rate for Eurodif S.A. (Eurodif)/Compagnie Generale Des Matieres Nucleaires (COGEMA), the producer/exporter of subject merchandise covered by this review. For further discussion of our analysis of the comments received for these final results, see the July 5, 2005, Issues and Decision Memorandum from Barbara E. Tillman, Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import Administration, to Joseph A. Spetrini, AGENCY: E:\FR\FM\12JYN1.SGM 12JYN1 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 132 / Tuesday, July 12, 2005 / Notices Acting Assistant Secretary for Import Administration, concerning the Final Results of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review: Low Enriched Uranium from France (LEU Decision Memorandum 2003). The final net subsidy rate for Eurodif/COGEMA is listed below in ‘‘Final Results of Review.’’ EFFECTIVE DATE: July 12, 2005. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kristen Johnson, Import Administration, AD/CVD Operations, Office 3, U.S. Department of Commerce, Room 4014, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–4793. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background On March 7, 2005, the Department published in the Federal Register the preliminary results (see LEU Preliminary Results 2003 at 70 FR 10989). We invited interested parties to comment on the results. On April 7, 2005, we received a case brief from Eurodif/COGEMA and the Government of France (GOF), the respondents. On April 12, 2005, we received a rebuttal brief from petitioners.1 Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(b), this review covers only those producers or exporters of the subject merchandise for which a review was specifically requested. Accordingly, this review covers only Eurodif/ COGEMA. The review covers the period January 1, 2003, through December 31, 2003, and two programs. Scope of Order The product covered by this order is all low enriched uranium (LEU). LEU is enriched uranium hexafluoride (UF6) with a U235 product assay of less than 20 percent that has not been converted into another chemical form, such as UO2, or fabricated into nuclear fuel assemblies, regardless of the means by which the LEU is produced (including LEU produced through the down– blending of highly enriched uranium). Certain merchandise is outside the scope of this order. Specifically, this order does not cover enriched uranium hexafluoride with a U235 assay of 20 percent or greater, also known as highly enriched uranium. In addition, fabricated LEU is not covered by the scope of this order. For purposes of this order, fabricated uranium is defined as enriched uranium dioxide (UO2), whether or not contained in nuclear fuel rods or assemblies. Natural uranium concentrates (U3O8) with a U235 1 Petitioners are the United States Enrichment Corporation (USEC) and USEC Inc. VerDate jul<14>2003 16:15 Jul 11, 2005 Jkt 205001 concentration of no greater than 0.711 percent and natural uranium concentrates converted into uranium hexafluoride with a U235 concentration of no greater than 0.711 percent are not covered by the scope of this order. Also excluded from this order is LEU owned by a foreign utility end–user and imported into the United States by or for such end–user solely for purposes of conversion by a U.S. fabricator into uranium dioxide (UO2) and/or fabrication into fuel assemblies so long as the uranium dioxide and/or fuel assemblies deemed to incorporate such imported LEU (i) remain in the possession and control of the U.S. fabricator, the foreign end–user, or their designated transporter(s) while in U.S. customs territory, and (ii) are re– exported within eighteen (18) months of entry of the LEU for consumption by the end–user in a nuclear reactor outside the United States. Such entries must be accompanied by the certifications of the importer and end user. The merchandise subject to this order is currently classifiable in the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) at subheading 2844.20.0020. Subject merchandise may also enter under 2844.20.0030, 2844.20.0050, and 2844.40.00. Although the HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes, the written description of the merchandise is dispositive. Analysis of Comments Received All issues raised in the case and rebuttal briefs by parties to this review are addressed in the LEU Decision Memorandum 2003, which is hereby adopted by this notice. A list of the issues contained in that decision memorandum is attached to this notice as Appendix I. Parties can find a complete discussion of the issues raised in this review and the corresponding recommendations in that public memorandum, which is on file in the Central Records Unit (CRU), room B– 099 of the Main Commerce Building. In addition, a complete copy of the LEU Decision Memorandum 2003 can be accessed directly on the World Wide Web at http://ia.ita.doc.gov, under the heading ‘‘Federal Register Notices.’’ The paper copy and electronic version of the decision memorandum are identical in content. Final Results of Review In accordance with section 705(c)(1)(B)(i) of the Act, we calculated an ad valorem subsidy rate for Eurodif/ COGEMA. For the review period, we determine the net subsidy rate to be 1.23 percent ad valorem. PO 00000 Frm 00013 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 39999 As discussed in Comment 2 of the LEU Decision Memorandum 2003, we have been enjoined from liquidating entries of the subject merchandise. Therefore, we do not intend to issue liquidation instructions to U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) for entries made during the period January 1, 2003, through December 31, 2003, until such time as the injunctions, issued on June 24, 2002, and November 1, 2004, are lifted. We will instruct CBP, within 15 days of publication of the final results of this review, to collect cash deposits of estimated countervailing duties at 1.23 percent ad valorem of the f.o.b. price on all shipments of the subject merchandise from the reviewed entity, entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the date of publication of the final results. We will instruct CBP to continue to collect cash deposits for non–reviewed companies at the most recent company– specific rate applicable to the company. Accordingly, the cash deposit rate that will be applied to non–reviewed companies covered by this order will be the rate for that company established in the investigation. See Amended Final Determination and Notice of Countervailing Duty Order: Low Enriched Uranium from France, 67 FR 6689 (February 13, 2002). The ‘‘all others’’ rate shall apply to all non– reviewed companies until a review of a company assigned this rate is requested. This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility concerning the disposition of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely written notification of return/ destruction of APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and the terms of an APO is a sanctionable violation. This administrative review and this notice are issued and published in accordance with section 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act. Dated: July 5, 2005. Barbara E. Tillman, Acting Assistant Secretary for Import Administration. Appendix I–Issues and Decision Memorandum I. SUBSIDIES VALUATION INFORMATION A. Calculation of Ad Valorem Rates II. ANALYSIS OF PROGRAMS A. Programs Determined to Confer Subsidies E:\FR\FM\12JYN1.SGM 12JYN1 40000 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 132 / Tuesday, July 12, 2005 / Notices 1. Purchases at Prices that Constitute ‘‘More Than Adequate Remuneration’’ 2. Exoneration/Reimbursement of Corporate Income Taxes III. TOTAL AD VALOREM RATE IV. ANALYSIS OF COMMENTS Comment 1: Benefit from Transaction Comment 2: Draft Customs Instructions Uranium from Germany, the Netherlands, and the United Kingdom’’ (Decision Memorandum) dated July 5, 2005. The final net subsidy rates for the reviewed companies are listed below in the section entitled ‘‘Final Results of Reviews.’’ EFFECTIVE DATE: July 12, 2005. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: International Trade Administration Darla Brown, AD/CVD Operations, Office 3, Import Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, Room 4012, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–2786. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: (C–428–829); (C–421–809); (C–412–821) Background Final Results of Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews: Low Enriched Uranium from Germany, the Netherlands, and the United Kingdom On March 7, 2005, the Department published in the Federal Register its Preliminary Results. We invited interested parties to comment on the results. Since the preliminary results, the following events have occurred. On April 6, 2005, we received case briefs from respondents. In their case brief, respondents requested a hearing. On April 11, 2005, we received rebuttal briefs from petitioners.1 On April 12, 2005, respondents withdrew their request for a hearing. Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(b), these reviews cover only those producers or exporters of the subject merchandise for which a review was specifically requested. Accordingly, these reviews cover the Urenco Group. These reviews cover the period January 1, 2003, through December 31, 2003, and four programs. [FR Doc. E5–3687 Filed 7–11–05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Import Administration, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce SUMMARY: On March 7, 2005, the Department of Commerce (the Department) published in the Federal Register its preliminary results of administrative reviews of the countervailing duty (CVD) orders on low enriched uranium from Germany, the Netherlands, and the United Kingdom for the period January 1, 2003, through December 31, 2003 (see Preliminary Results of Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews: Low Enriched Uranium from Germany, the Netherlands, and the United Kingdom, 70 FR 10986 (March 7, 2005) (Preliminary Results)). The Department has now completed these administrative reviews in accordance with section 751(a) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). Based on information received since the Preliminary Results and our analysis of the comments received, the Department has not revised the net subsidy rate for Urenco Deutschland GmbH of Germany (UD), Urenco Nederland B.V. of the Netherlands (UNL), Urenco (Capenhurst) Limited (UCL) of the United Kingdom, Urenco Ltd., and Urenco Inc. (collectively, the Urenco Group or respondents), the producers/exporters of subject merchandise covered by these reviews. For further discussion of our positions, see the ‘‘Issues and Decision Memorandum’’ from Barbara E. Tillman, Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import Administration, to Joseph A. Spetrini, Acting Assistant Secretary for Import Administration concerning the ‘‘Final Results of Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews: Low Enriched AGENCY: VerDate jul<14>2003 16:15 Jul 11, 2005 Jkt 205001 Scope of the Orders For purposes of these orders, the product covered is all low enriched uranium (LEU). LEU is enriched uranium hexafluoride (UF6) with a U235 product assay of less than 20 percent that has not been converted into another chemical form, such as UO2, or fabricated into nuclear fuel assemblies, regardless of the means by which the LEU is produced (including LEU produced through the down–blending of highly enriched uranium). Certain merchandise is outside the scope of these orders. Specifically, these orders do not cover enriched uranium hexafluoride with a U235 assay of 20 percent or greater, also known as highly enriched uranium. In addition, fabricated LEU is not covered by the scope of these orders. For purposes of these orders, fabricated uranium is defined as enriched uranium dioxide (UO2), whether or not contained in 1 Petitioners are the United States Enrichment Corporation (USEC) and USEC Inc. PO 00000 Frm 00014 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 nuclear fuel rods or assemblies. Natural uranium concentrates (U3O8) with a U235 concentration of no greater than 0.711 percent and natural uranium concentrates converted into uranium hexafluoride with a U235 concentration of no greater than 0.711 percent are not covered by the scope of these orders. Also excluded from these orders is LEU owned by a foreign utility end–user and imported into the United States by or for such end–user solely for purposes of conversion by a U.S. fabricator into uranium dioxide (UO2) and/or fabrication into fuel assemblies so long as the uranium dioxide and/or fuel assemblies deemed to incorporate such imported LEU (i) remain in the possession and control of the U.S. fabricator, the foreign end–user, or their designated transporter(s) while in U.S. customs territory, and (ii) are re– exported within eighteen (18) months of entry of the LEU for consumption by the end–user in a nuclear reactor outside the United States. Such entries must be accompanied by the certifications of the importer and end user. The merchandise subject to these orders is currently classifiable in the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) at subheading 2844.20.0020. Subject merchandise may also enter under HTSUS subheadings 2844.20.0030, 2844.20.0050, and 2844.40.00. Although the HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes, the written description of the merchandise is dispositive. Analysis of Comments Received All issues raised in the case and rebuttal briefs by parties to these reviews are addressed in the Decision Memorandum, which is hereby adopted by this notice. A list of the issues contained in the Decision Memorandum is attached to this notice as Appendix I. Parties can find a complete discussion of all issues raised in these reviews and the corresponding recommendations in this public memorandum, which is on file in the Central Record Unit (CRU), room B–099 of the main Commerce building. In addition, a complete version of the Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly on the World Wide Web at http://ia.ita.doc.gov, under the heading ‘‘Federal Register Notices.’’ The paper copy and electronic version of the Decision Memorandum are identical in content. Final Results of Reviews In accordance with section 777A(e)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.221(b)(5), we calculated an ad valorem subsidy rate for the Urenco Group for calendar year E:\FR\FM\12JYN1.SGM 12JYN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 132 (Tuesday, July 12, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 39998-40000]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E5-3687]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

(C-427-819)


Final Results of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review: Low 
Enriched Uranium from France

AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On March 7, 2005, the Department of Commerce (the Department) 
published in the Federal Register its preliminary results of 
administrative review of the countervailing duty (CVD) order on low 
enriched uranium from France for the period January 1, 2003, through 
December 31, 2003 (see Preliminary Results of Countervailing Duty 
Administrative Review: Low Enriched Uranium from France, 70 FR 10989 
(March 7, 2005) (LEU Preliminary Results 2003)). The Department has now 
completed the administrative review in accordance with section 751(a) 
of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act).
    Based on our analysis of the comments received, the Department has 
not revised the net subsidy rate for Eurodif S.A. (Eurodif)/Compagnie 
Generale Des Matieres Nucleaires (COGEMA), the producer/exporter of 
subject merchandise covered by this review. For further discussion of 
our analysis of the comments received for these final results, see the 
July 5, 2005, Issues and Decision Memorandum from Barbara E. Tillman, 
Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import Administration, to Joseph 
A. Spetrini,

[[Page 39999]]

Acting Assistant Secretary for Import Administration, concerning the 
Final Results of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review: Low 
Enriched Uranium from France (LEU Decision Memorandum 2003). The final 
net subsidy rate for Eurodif/COGEMA is listed below in ``Final Results 
of Review.''

EFFECTIVE DATE: July 12, 2005.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kristen Johnson, Import 
Administration, AD/CVD Operations, Office 3, U.S. Department of 
Commerce, Room 4014, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue, NW, 
Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-4793.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    On March 7, 2005, the Department published in the Federal Register 
the preliminary results (see LEU Preliminary Results 2003 at 70 FR 
10989). We invited interested parties to comment on the results. On 
April 7, 2005, we received a case brief from Eurodif/COGEMA and the 
Government of France (GOF), the respondents. On April 12, 2005, we 
received a rebuttal brief from petitioners.\1\ Pursuant to 19 CFR 
351.213(b), this review covers only those producers or exporters of the 
subject merchandise for which a review was specifically requested. 
Accordingly, this review covers only Eurodif/COGEMA. The review covers 
the period January 1, 2003, through December 31, 2003, and two 
programs.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ Petitioners are the United States Enrichment Corporation 
(USEC) and USEC Inc.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Scope of Order

    The product covered by this order is all low enriched uranium 
(LEU). LEU is enriched uranium hexafluoride (UF6) with a 
U\235\ product assay of less than 20 percent that has not been 
converted into another chemical form, such as UO2, or 
fabricated into nuclear fuel assemblies, regardless of the means by 
which the LEU is produced (including LEU produced through the down-
blending of highly enriched uranium).
    Certain merchandise is outside the scope of this order. 
Specifically, this order does not cover enriched uranium hexafluoride 
with a U\235\ assay of 20 percent or greater, also known as highly 
enriched uranium. In addition, fabricated LEU is not covered by the 
scope of this order. For purposes of this order, fabricated uranium is 
defined as enriched uranium dioxide (UO2), whether or not 
contained in nuclear fuel rods or assemblies. Natural uranium 
concentrates (U3O8) with a U\235\ concentration 
of no greater than 0.711 percent and natural uranium concentrates 
converted into uranium hexafluoride with a U\235\ concentration of no 
greater than 0.711 percent are not covered by the scope of this order.
    Also excluded from this order is LEU owned by a foreign utility 
end-user and imported into the United States by or for such end-user 
solely for purposes of conversion by a U.S. fabricator into uranium 
dioxide (UO2) and/or fabrication into fuel assemblies so 
long as the uranium dioxide and/or fuel assemblies deemed to 
incorporate such imported LEU (i) remain in the possession and control 
of the U.S. fabricator, the foreign end-user, or their designated 
transporter(s) while in U.S. customs territory, and (ii) are re-
exported within eighteen (18) months of entry of the LEU for 
consumption by the end-user in a nuclear reactor outside the United 
States. Such entries must be accompanied by the certifications of the 
importer and end user.
    The merchandise subject to this order is currently classifiable in 
the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) at 
subheading 2844.20.0020. Subject merchandise may also enter under 
2844.20.0030, 2844.20.0050, and 2844.40.00. Although the HTSUS 
subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes, the 
written description of the merchandise is dispositive.

Analysis of Comments Received

    All issues raised in the case and rebuttal briefs by parties to 
this review are addressed in the LEU Decision Memorandum 2003, which is 
hereby adopted by this notice. A list of the issues contained in that 
decision memorandum is attached to this notice as Appendix I. Parties 
can find a complete discussion of the issues raised in this review and 
the corresponding recommendations in that public memorandum, which is 
on file in the Central Records Unit (CRU), room B-099 of the Main 
Commerce Building. In addition, a complete copy of the LEU Decision 
Memorandum 2003 can be accessed directly on the World Wide Web at 
http://ia.ita.doc.gov, under the heading ``Federal Register Notices.'' 
The paper copy and electronic version of the decision memorandum are 
identical in content.

Final Results of Review

    In accordance with section 705(c)(1)(B)(i) of the Act, we 
calculated an ad valorem subsidy rate for Eurodif/COGEMA. For the 
review period, we determine the net subsidy rate to be 1.23 percent ad 
valorem.
    As discussed in Comment 2 of the LEU Decision Memorandum 2003, we 
have been enjoined from liquidating entries of the subject merchandise. 
Therefore, we do not intend to issue liquidation instructions to U.S. 
Customs and Border Protection (CBP) for entries made during the period 
January 1, 2003, through December 31, 2003, until such time as the 
injunctions, issued on June 24, 2002, and November 1, 2004, are lifted.
    We will instruct CBP, within 15 days of publication of the final 
results of this review, to collect cash deposits of estimated 
countervailing duties at 1.23 percent ad valorem of the f.o.b. price on 
all shipments of the subject merchandise from the reviewed entity, 
entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the 
date of publication of the final results.
    We will instruct CBP to continue to collect cash deposits for non-
reviewed companies at the most recent company-specific rate applicable 
to the company. Accordingly, the cash deposit rate that will be applied 
to non-reviewed companies covered by this order will be the rate for 
that company established in the investigation. See Amended Final 
Determination and Notice of Countervailing Duty Order: Low Enriched 
Uranium from France, 67 FR 6689 (February 13, 2002). The ``all others'' 
rate shall apply to all non-reviewed companies until a review of a 
company assigned this rate is requested.
    This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to 
administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility 
concerning the disposition of proprietary information disclosed under 
APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely written 
notification of return/destruction of APO materials or conversion to 
judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to comply with 
the regulations and the terms of an APO is a sanctionable violation.
    This administrative review and this notice are issued and published 
in accordance with section 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act.

    Dated: July 5, 2005.
Barbara E. Tillman,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Import Administration.

Appendix I-Issues and Decision Memorandum

I. SUBSIDIES VALUATION INFORMATION
    A. Calculation of Ad Valorem Rates
II. ANALYSIS OF PROGRAMS
    A. Programs Determined to Confer Subsidies

[[Page 40000]]

    1. Purchases at Prices that Constitute ``More Than Adequate 
Remuneration''
    2. Exoneration/Reimbursement of Corporate Income Taxes
III. TOTAL AD VALOREM RATE
IV. ANALYSIS OF COMMENTS
    Comment 1: Benefit from Transaction
    Comment 2: Draft Customs Instructions
[FR Doc. E5-3687 Filed 7-11-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-S