North American Free-Trade Agreement, Article 1904; NAFTA Panel Reviews; Request for Panel Review, 40003 [E5-3677]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 132 / Tuesday, July 12, 2005 / Notices
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
North American Free-Trade
Agreement, Article 1904; NAFTA Panel
Reviews; Request for Panel Review
NAFTA Secretariat, United
States Section, International Trade
Administration, Department of
Commerce.
ACTION: Notice of first request for panel
review.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: On June 24, 2005, Berg Steel
Pipe Corporation filed a First Request
for Panel Review with the Mexican
Section of the NAFTA Secretariat
pursuant to Article 1904 of the North
American Free Trade Agreement. Panel
review was requested of the
antidumping duty determination made
by the Secretaria de Economia,
respecting Pipe Line Longitudinally
Welded with external or internal circle
closed section, classified as tariff item
7305.11.01 and 7305.12.01 originating
in the United States of America. This
determination was published in the
Diario Oficial de la Federacion, on May
27, 2005. The NAFTA Secretariat has
assigned Case Number MEX–USA–
2005–1904–01 to this request.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Caratina L. Alston, United States
Secretary, NAFTA Secretariat, Suite
2061, 14th and Constitution Avenue,
Washington, DC 20230, (202) 482–5438.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Chapter
19 of the North American Free-Trade
Agreement (‘‘Agreement’’) establishes a
mechanism to replace domestic judicial
review of final determinations in
antidumping and countervailing duty
cases involving imports from a NAFTA
country with review by independent
binational panels. When a Request for
Panel Review is filed, a panel is
established to act in place of national
courts to review expeditiously the final
determination to determine whether it
conforms with the antidumping or
countervailing duty law of the country
that made the determination.
Under Article 1904 of the Agreement,
which came into force on January 1,
1994, the Government of the United
States, the Government of Canada and
the Government of Mexico established
Rules of Procedure for Article 1904
Binational Panel Reviews (‘‘Rules’’).
These Rules were published in the
Federal Register on February 23, 1994
(59 FR 8686).
A first Request for Panel Review was
filed with the Mexican Section of the
NAFTA Secretariat, pursuant to Article
1904 of the Agreement, on June 24,
VerDate jul<14>2003
16:15 Jul 11, 2005
Jkt 205001
2005, requesting panel review of the
final determination described above.
The Rules provide that:
(a) A Party or interested person may
challenge the final determination in
whole or in part by filing a Complaint
in accordance with Rule 39 within 30
days after the filing of the first Request
for Panel Review (the deadline for filing
a Complaint is July 25, 2005);
(b) A Party, investigating authority or
interested person that does not file a
Complaint but that intends to appear in
support of any reviewable portion of the
final determination may participate in
the panel review by filing a Notice of
Appearance in accordance with Rule 40
within 45 days after the filing of the first
Request for Panel Review (the deadline
for filing a Notice of Appearance is
August 8, 2005); and
(c) The panel review shall be limited
to the allegations of error of fact or law,
including the jurisdiction of the
investigating authority, that are set out
in the Complaints filed in the panel
review and the procedural and
substantive defenses raised in the panel
review.
Dated: July 6, 2005.
Caratina L. Alston,
United States Secretary, NAFTA Secretariat.
[FR Doc. E5–3677 Filed 7–11–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–GT–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
Proposed Information Collection;
Comment Request; Submission of
Conservation Efforts To Make Listings
Unnecessary Under the Endangered
Species Act
National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA).
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The Department of
Commerce, as part of its continuing
effort to reduce paperwork and
respondent burden, invites the general
public and other Federal agencies to
take this opportunity to comment on
proposed and/or continuing information
collections, as required by the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
DATES: Written comments must be
submitted on or before September 12,
2005.
Direct all written comments
to Diana Hynek, Departmental
Paperwork Clearance Officer,
Department of Commerce, Room 6625,
14th and Constitution Avenue, NW.,
ADDRESSES:
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
40003
Washington, DC 20230 (or via the
Internet at dHynek@doc.gov).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Requests for additional information or
copies of the information collection
instrument and instructions should be
directed to Marta Nammack, (301) 713–
1401 or Marta.Nammack@noaa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Abstract
The National Marine Fisheries Service
(NMFS) and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service (Services) announced a final
policy on the criteria the Services will
use to evaluate conservation efforts by
states and other non-Federal entities.
The Services take these efforts into
account when making decisions on
whether to list a species as threatened
or endangered under the Endangered
Species Act. The efforts usually involve
the development of a conservation plan
or agreement, procedures for monitoring
the effectiveness of the plan or
agreement, and an annual report.
II. Method of Collection
NMFS does not require, but will
accept, plans and reports electronically.
NMFS has not developed a form to be
used for submission of plans or reports.
In the past, NMFS has made plans and
annual reports from states available
through the Internet and plans to
continue this practice.
III. Data
OMB Number: 0648–0466.
Form Number: None.
Type of Review: Regular submission.
Affected Public: Business or other forprofit organizations; and State, local or
tribal governments.
Estimated Number of Respondents: 3.
Estimated Time per Response: 2,500
hours to complete each agreement or
plan that has the intention of making
listing unnecessary; 320 hours to
conduct monitoring for successful
agreements; and 80 hours to prepare a
report for successful agreements.
Estimated Total Annual Burden
Hours: 3,300.
Estimated Total Annual Cost to
Public: $165,000.
IV. Request for Comments
Comments are invited on: (a) Whether
the proposed collection of information
is necessary for the proper performance
of the functions of the agency, including
whether the information shall have
practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden
(including hours and cost) of the
proposed collection of information; (c)
ways to enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
E:\FR\FM\12JYN1.SGM
12JYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 132 (Tuesday, July 12, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 40003]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E5-3677]
[[Page 40003]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
North American Free-Trade Agreement, Article 1904; NAFTA Panel
Reviews; Request for Panel Review
AGENCY: NAFTA Secretariat, United States Section, International Trade
Administration, Department of Commerce.
ACTION: Notice of first request for panel review.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: On June 24, 2005, Berg Steel Pipe Corporation filed a First
Request for Panel Review with the Mexican Section of the NAFTA
Secretariat pursuant to Article 1904 of the North American Free Trade
Agreement. Panel review was requested of the antidumping duty
determination made by the Secretaria de Economia, respecting Pipe Line
Longitudinally Welded with external or internal circle closed section,
classified as tariff item 7305.11.01 and 7305.12.01 originating in the
United States of America. This determination was published in the
Diario Oficial de la Federacion, on May 27, 2005. The NAFTA Secretariat
has assigned Case Number MEX-USA-2005-1904-01 to this request.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Caratina L. Alston, United States
Secretary, NAFTA Secretariat, Suite 2061, 14th and Constitution Avenue,
Washington, DC 20230, (202) 482-5438.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Chapter 19 of the North American Free-Trade
Agreement (``Agreement'') establishes a mechanism to replace domestic
judicial review of final determinations in antidumping and
countervailing duty cases involving imports from a NAFTA country with
review by independent binational panels. When a Request for Panel
Review is filed, a panel is established to act in place of national
courts to review expeditiously the final determination to determine
whether it conforms with the antidumping or countervailing duty law of
the country that made the determination.
Under Article 1904 of the Agreement, which came into force on
January 1, 1994, the Government of the United States, the Government of
Canada and the Government of Mexico established Rules of Procedure for
Article 1904 Binational Panel Reviews (``Rules''). These Rules were
published in the Federal Register on February 23, 1994 (59 FR 8686).
A first Request for Panel Review was filed with the Mexican Section
of the NAFTA Secretariat, pursuant to Article 1904 of the Agreement, on
June 24, 2005, requesting panel review of the final determination
described above.
The Rules provide that:
(a) A Party or interested person may challenge the final
determination in whole or in part by filing a Complaint in accordance
with Rule 39 within 30 days after the filing of the first Request for
Panel Review (the deadline for filing a Complaint is July 25, 2005);
(b) A Party, investigating authority or interested person that does
not file a Complaint but that intends to appear in support of any
reviewable portion of the final determination may participate in the
panel review by filing a Notice of Appearance in accordance with Rule
40 within 45 days after the filing of the first Request for Panel
Review (the deadline for filing a Notice of Appearance is August 8,
2005); and
(c) The panel review shall be limited to the allegations of error
of fact or law, including the jurisdiction of the investigating
authority, that are set out in the Complaints filed in the panel review
and the procedural and substantive defenses raised in the panel review.
Dated: July 6, 2005.
Caratina L. Alston,
United States Secretary, NAFTA Secretariat.
[FR Doc. E5-3677 Filed 7-11-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-GT-P