Certain Carbon Steel Butt-Weld Pipe Fittings from Brazil, Taiwan, Japan, Thailand, and the People's Republic of China; Final Results of the Expedited Sunset Reviews of the Antidumping Duty Orders, 39486-39487 [E5-3596]
Download as PDF
39486
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 130 / Friday, July 8, 2005 / Notices
responsibility concerning the
disposition of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.306. Timely written
notification of the return/destruction of
APO materials or conversion to judicial
protective order is hereby requested.
Failure to comply with the regulations
and terms of an APO is a sanctionable
violation.
This notice is in accordance with
sections 751(b) and 777(i)(1) of the Act,
and section 351.216(e) of the
Department’s regulations.
Trade Administration, U.S. Department
of Commerce, 14th Street & Constitution
Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230;
telephone: (202) 482–4340.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
(‘‘TSUSA’’) item number 610.8800.
These imports are currently classifiable
under the Harmonized Tariff Schedule
of the United States (‘‘HTSUS’’) item
number 7307.93.30.
Background:
Pipe fittings from Thailand and China
are defined as carbon steel butt–weld
pipe fittings, having an inside diameter
of less than 14 inches, imported in
either finished or unfinished form.
These formed or forged pipe fittings are
used to join section in piping systems
where conditions require permanent,
welded connections, as distinguished
from fittings based on other fastening
methods (e.g., threaded grooved, or
bolted fittings). These imports are
currently classifiable under the HTSUS
item number 7307.93.30.
On December 1, 2004, the Department
published the notice of initiation of the
second sunset reviews of the
antidumping duty orders on pipe
fittings from Brazil, Taiwan, Japan,
Thailand, and the People’s Republic of
China pursuant to section 751(c) of the
Act. See Initiation of Five–Year
Dated: June 24, 2005.
(‘‘Sunset’’) Reviews, 69 FR 69891
Joseph A. Spetrini,
(December 1, 2004). The Department
Acting Assistant Secretary for Import
received the Notice of Intent to
Administration.
Participate from Trinity Industries, Inc.1
[FR Doc. E5–3597 Filed 7–7–05; 8:45 am]
(‘‘Trinity’’); Weldbend Corp.
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S
(‘‘Weldbend’’); Tubing Forgings of
America, Inc.; and Mills Iron Works,
Inc. (‘‘TFA/Mills Iron’’) (collectively
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
‘‘the domestic interested parties’’),
within the deadline specified in section
International Trade Administration
351.218(d)(1)(i) of the Department’s
[A–351–602, A–583–605, A–588–602, A–549– Regulations (‘‘Sunset Regulations’’). The
807, A–570–814]
domestic interested parties claimed
interested party status under section
Certain Carbon Steel Butt–Weld Pipe
771(9)(C) of the Act, as manufacturers of
Fittings from Brazil, Taiwan, Japan,
a domestic–like product in the United
Thailand, and the People’s Republic of States. We received complete
China; Final Results of the Expedited
substantive responses from the domestic
Sunset Reviews of the Antidumping
interested parties within the 30–day
Duty Orders
deadline specified in 19 CFR
351.218(d)(3)(i). We received no
AGENCY: Import Administration,
responses from the respondent
International Trade Administration,
interested parties. As a result, pursuant
Department of Commerce.
to section 751(c)(5)(A) of the Act and 19
SUMMARY: On December 1, 2004, the
CFR 351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2), the
Department of Commerce (‘‘the
Department’’) initiated sunset reviews of Department conducted an expedited
(120–day) sunset review of this order.
the antidumping duty orders on certain
carbon steel butt–weld pipe fittings
Scope of the Orders:
(‘‘pipe fittings’’) from Brazil, Taiwan,
The products covered by these orders
Japan, Thailand, and the People’s
are pipe fittings from Brazil, Taiwan,
Republic of China pursuant to section
Japan, Thailand, and China. Pipe fittings
751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
from Brazil, Taiwan, and Japan are
amended (‘‘the Act’’). On the basis of a
defined as carbon steel butt–weld pipe
notice of intent to participate and
fittings, other than couplings, under 14
adequate substantive responses filed on
inches in diameter, whether finished or
behalf of domestic interested parties and
unfinished form, that have been formed
inadequate response from respondent
in the shape of elbows, tees, reducer,
interested parties, the Department
caps, etc., and, if forged, have been
conducted expedited (120–day) sunset
advanced after forging. These
reviews. As a result of these sunset
advancements may include any one or
reviews, the Department finds that
more of the following: coining, heat
revocation of the antidumping duty
treatment, shot blasting, grinding, die
orders would be likely to lead to
stamping or painting. Such merchandise
continuation or recurrence of dumping.
was classifiable under Tariff Schedules
The dumping margins are identified in
of the United States Annotated
the Final Results of Review section of
this notice.
1 Ladish Co., Inc. was a petitioner in the
investigation. Trinity acquired the assets of Ladish
EFFECTIVE DATE: July 8, 2005.
relating to the production of carbon steel butt-weld
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
pipe fittings in 1997. See Notice of Intent to
Hilary E. Sadler, Esq., Office of Policy
Participate from Trinity Industries (December 17,
for Import Administration, International 2004).
VerDate jul<14>2003
17:25 Jul 07, 2005
Jkt 205001
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
The TSUSA and HTSUS subheadings
are provided for convenience and
customs purposes. The written
description remains dispositive as to the
scope of the product coverage for each
of the orders.
Analysis of Comments Received
All issues raised in these reviews are
addressed in the ‘‘Issues and Decision
Memorandum’’ (‘‘Decision Memo’’)
from Edward Yang, Senior Director,
China/NME Office, Import
Administration, to Joseph A. Spetrini,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration, dated June 29, 2005,
which is hereby adopted by this notice.
The issues discussed in the Decision
Memo include the likelihood of
continuation or recurrence of dumping
and the magnitude of the margins likely
to prevail if the orders were to be
revoked. Parties can find a complete
discussion of all issues raised in these
reviews and the corresponding
recommendations in this public
memorandum which is on file in room
B–099 of the main Commerce Building.
In addition, a complete version of the
Decision Memo can be accessed directly
on the Web at https://ia.ita.doc.gov/frn,
under the heading ‘‘July 2005.’’ The
paper copy and electronic version of the
Decision Memo are identical in content.
Final Results of Reviews
We determine that revocation of the
antidumping duty orders on pipe
fittings from Brazil, Taiwan, Japan,
Thailand, and the People’s Republic of
China would be likely to lead to
continuation or recurrence of dumping
at the following weighted–average
percentage margins:
E:\FR\FM\08JYN1.SGM
08JYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 130 / Friday, July 8, 2005 / Notices
Manufacturers/Exporters/Producers
Weighted Average Margin (percent)
Brazil
All Manufacturers/Producers/Exporters ...........................................................................................................
Taiwan
Rigid .................................................................................................................................................................
C.M. .................................................................................................................................................................
Gei Bay ............................................................................................................................................................
Chup Hsin ........................................................................................................................................................
All Others .........................................................................................................................................................
Japan
Awajoi Sangyo, K.K. ........................................................................................................................................
Nippon Benkan Kogyo, Ltd. Co. ......................................................................................................................
All Others .........................................................................................................................................................
Thailand
Thai Benkan Company ....................................................................................................................................
TTU Industrial Corp., Ltd. ................................................................................................................................
All Others .........................................................................................................................................................
People’s Republic of China
China North Industries Corporation .................................................................................................................
Jilin Provincial Machinery & Equipment Import & Export Corp. ......................................................................
Liaoning Machinery & Equipment Import Export Corp. ...................................................................................
Liaoning Metals & Minerals Import & Export Corp. .........................................................................................
Shenyang Billiongold Pipe Fittings Co. Ltd. ....................................................................................................
Shandong Metals & Minerals Import & Export Corp. ......................................................................................
Shenyang Machinery & Equipment Import & Export Corp;.
Lianoning Metals; Shenzhen Machinery Industry Corp.;.
and All Others ..................................................................................................................................................
This notice also serves as the only
reminder to parties subject to
administrative protective orders
(‘‘APO’’) of their responsibility
concerning the return or destruction of
proprietary information disclosed under
APO in accordance with 19 CFR
351.305 of the Department’s regulations.
Timely notification of the return or
destruction of APO materials or
conversion to judicial protective orders
is hereby requested. Failure to comply
with the regulations and terms of an
APO is a violation which is subject to
sanction.
We are issuing and publishing the
results and notice in accordance with
sections 751(c), 752, and 777(i)(1) of the
Act.
Dated: June 29, 2005.
Joseph A. Spetrini,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration.
[FR Doc. E5–3596 Filed 6–7–05; 8:45 am]
Billing Code: 3510–DS–S
EFFECTIVE DATE: July 8, 2005.).
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
(‘‘the Department’’) has received a
request to conduct a new shipper review
of the antidumping duty (‘‘AD’’) order
on certain welded carbon steel pipe and
tube from Turkey. In accordance with
section 751(a)(2)(B) of the Tariff Act of
1930, as amended (‘‘the Act’’), and 19
CFR 351.214, we are initiating an AD
new shipper review for Toscelik Profil
¸
ve Sac Endustrisi A.S. (‘‘Toscelik’’), and
¸
its affiliated export trading company,
Tosyali Dis Ticaret A.S. (‘‘Tosyali’’).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Christopher Hargett, Lyman Armstrong,
or Victoria Cho, at (202) 482–4161, (202)
482–3601, or (202) 482–5075,
respectively; AD/CVD Operations,
Office 3, Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th
Street and Constitution Avenue, NW.,
Washington, DC 20230.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Certain Welded Carbon Steel Pipe and
Tube from Turkey: Notice of Initiation
of Antidumping Duty New Shipper
Review for the Period May 1, 2004,
through April 30, 2005.
On May 31, 2005, the Department
received a timely request from Toscelik,
¸
in accordance with 19 CFR 351.214(b),
for a new shipper review of the AD
order on certain welded carbon steel
pipe and tube from Turkey, which has
a May anniversary month.1
As required by 19 CFR
351.214(b)(2)(i) and (iii)(A), Toscelik
¸
certified that it did not export subject
Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
1 See Antidumping Duty Order; Welded Carbon
Steel Standard Pipe and Tube Products from
Turkey, 51 FR 17784 (May 15, 1986).
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–489–501]
AGENCY:
VerDate jul<14>2003
16:32 Jul 07, 2005
Jkt 205001
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4703
39487
Sfmt 4703
52.25
6.84
8.57
87.30
87.30
49.46
30.83
65.81
62.79
52.60
10.68
39.10
154.72
75.23
134.79
103.70
110.39
35.06
182.90
merchandise to the United States during
the period of investigation (‘‘POI’’), and
that it has never been affiliated with any
exporter or producer which exported
subject merchandise during the POI.2
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.214(b)(2)(iv),
the company submitted documentation
establishing the date on which it first
shipped the subject merchandise to the
United States, the date of entry of that
first shipment, the volume of that and
subsequent shipments, and the date of
the first sale to an unaffiliated customer
in the United States.3
Initiation of Review
In accordance with section
751(a)(2)(B) of the Act and 19 CFR
351.214, and based on information on
the record, we are initiating an AD new
shipper review for Toscelik. We intend
¸
to issue the preliminary results of this
new shipper review not later than 180
days after initiation of this review. We
intend to issue final results of this
review no later than 90 days after the
date on which the preliminary results
are issued. See 19 CFR 351.214(i).
New Shipper Review Proceeding
Toscelik ...............................
¸
Period to be
Reviewed
05/01/2004 04/30/2005
2 See submission from the Law Offices of David
L. Simon on behalf of Toscelik Profil ve Sac
¸
Endustrisi A.S. to the Department regarding Request
for New Shipper Review, Case A-489-501, dated
May 31, 2005.
3 Id.
E:\FR\FM\08JYN1.SGM
08JYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 130 (Friday, July 8, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 39486-39487]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E5-3596]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-351-602, A-583-605, A-588-602, A-549-807, A-570-814]
Certain Carbon Steel Butt-Weld Pipe Fittings from Brazil, Taiwan,
Japan, Thailand, and the People's Republic of China; Final Results of
the Expedited Sunset Reviews of the Antidumping Duty Orders
AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On December 1, 2004, the Department of Commerce (``the
Department'') initiated sunset reviews of the antidumping duty orders
on certain carbon steel butt-weld pipe fittings (``pipe fittings'')
from Brazil, Taiwan, Japan, Thailand, and the People's Republic of
China pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended
(``the Act''). On the basis of a notice of intent to participate and
adequate substantive responses filed on behalf of domestic interested
parties and inadequate response from respondent interested parties, the
Department conducted expedited (120-day) sunset reviews. As a result of
these sunset reviews, the Department finds that revocation of the
antidumping duty orders would be likely to lead to continuation or
recurrence of dumping. The dumping margins are identified in the Final
Results of Review section of this notice.
EFFECTIVE DATE: July 8, 2005.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Hilary E. Sadler, Esq., Office of
Policy for Import Administration, International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street & Constitution Avenue, NW.,
Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-4340.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background:
On December 1, 2004, the Department published the notice of
initiation of the second sunset reviews of the antidumping duty orders
on pipe fittings from Brazil, Taiwan, Japan, Thailand, and the People's
Republic of China pursuant to section 751(c) of the Act. See Initiation
of Five-Year (``Sunset'') Reviews, 69 FR 69891 (December 1, 2004). The
Department received the Notice of Intent to Participate from Trinity
Industries, Inc.\1\ (``Trinity''); Weldbend Corp. (``Weldbend'');
Tubing Forgings of America, Inc.; and Mills Iron Works, Inc. (``TFA/
Mills Iron'') (collectively ``the domestic interested parties''),
within the deadline specified in section 351.218(d)(1)(i) of the
Department's Regulations (``Sunset Regulations''). The domestic
interested parties claimed interested party status under section
771(9)(C) of the Act, as manufacturers of a domestic-like product in
the United States. We received complete substantive responses from the
domestic interested parties within the 30-day deadline specified in 19
CFR 351.218(d)(3)(i). We received no responses from the respondent
interested parties. As a result, pursuant to section 751(c)(5)(A) of
the Act and 19 CFR 351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2), the Department conducted an
expedited (120-day) sunset review of this order.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Ladish Co., Inc. was a petitioner in the investigation.
Trinity acquired the assets of Ladish relating to the production of
carbon steel butt-weld pipe fittings in 1997. See Notice of Intent
to Participate from Trinity Industries (December 17, 2004).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Scope of the Orders:
The products covered by these orders are pipe fittings from Brazil,
Taiwan, Japan, Thailand, and China. Pipe fittings from Brazil, Taiwan,
and Japan are defined as carbon steel butt-weld pipe fittings, other
than couplings, under 14 inches in diameter, whether finished or
unfinished form, that have been formed in the shape of elbows, tees,
reducer, caps, etc., and, if forged, have been advanced after forging.
These advancements may include any one or more of the following:
coining, heat treatment, shot blasting, grinding, die stamping or
painting. Such merchandise was classifiable under Tariff Schedules of
the United States Annotated (``TSUSA'') item number 610.8800. These
imports are currently classifiable under the Harmonized Tariff Schedule
of the United States (``HTSUS'') item number 7307.93.30.
Pipe fittings from Thailand and China are defined as carbon steel
butt-weld pipe fittings, having an inside diameter of less than 14
inches, imported in either finished or unfinished form. These formed or
forged pipe fittings are used to join section in piping systems where
conditions require permanent, welded connections, as distinguished from
fittings based on other fastening methods (e.g., threaded grooved, or
bolted fittings). These imports are currently classifiable under the
HTSUS item number 7307.93.30.
The TSUSA and HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and
customs purposes. The written description remains dispositive as to the
scope of the product coverage for each of the orders.
Analysis of Comments Received
All issues raised in these reviews are addressed in the ``Issues
and Decision Memorandum'' (``Decision Memo'') from Edward Yang, Senior
Director, China/NME Office, Import Administration, to Joseph A.
Spetrini, Acting Assistant Secretary for Import Administration, dated
June 29, 2005, which is hereby adopted by this notice. The issues
discussed in the Decision Memo include the likelihood of continuation
or recurrence of dumping and the magnitude of the margins likely to
prevail if the orders were to be revoked. Parties can find a complete
discussion of all issues raised in these reviews and the corresponding
recommendations in this public memorandum which is on file in room B-
099 of the main Commerce Building.
In addition, a complete version of the Decision Memo can be
accessed directly on the Web at https://ia.ita.doc.gov/frn, under the
heading ``July 2005.'' The paper copy and electronic version of the
Decision Memo are identical in content.
Final Results of Reviews
We determine that revocation of the antidumping duty orders on pipe
fittings from Brazil, Taiwan, Japan, Thailand, and the People's
Republic of China would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence
of dumping at the following weighted-average percentage margins:
[[Page 39487]]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Manufacturers/Exporters/Producers Weighted Average Margin (percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Brazil
All Manufacturers/Producers/ 52.25
Exporters..........................
Taiwan
Rigid............................... 6.84
C.M................................. 8.57
Gei Bay............................. 87.30
Chup Hsin........................... 87.30
All Others.......................... 49.46
Japan
Awajoi Sangyo, K.K.................. 30.83
Nippon Benkan Kogyo, Ltd. Co........ 65.81
All Others.......................... 62.79
Thailand
Thai Benkan Company................. 52.60
TTU Industrial Corp., Ltd........... 10.68
All Others.......................... 39.10
People's Republic of China
China North Industries Corporation.. 154.72
Jilin Provincial Machinery & 75.23
Equipment Import & Export Corp.....
Liaoning Machinery & Equipment 134.79
Import Export Corp.................
Liaoning Metals & Minerals Import & 103.70
Export Corp........................
Shenyang Billiongold Pipe Fittings 110.39
Co. Ltd............................
Shandong Metals & Minerals Import & 35.06
Export Corp........................
Shenyang Machinery & Equipment
Import & Export Corp;..............
Lianoning Metals; Shenzhen Machinery
Industry Corp.;....................
and All Others...................... 182.90
------------------------------------------------------------------------
This notice also serves as the only reminder to parties subject to
administrative protective orders (``APO'') of their responsibility
concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305 of the
Department's regulations. Timely notification of the return or
destruction of APO materials or conversion to judicial protective
orders is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and
terms of an APO is a violation which is subject to sanction.
We are issuing and publishing the results and notice in accordance
with sections 751(c), 752, and 777(i)(1) of the Act.
Dated: June 29, 2005.
Joseph A. Spetrini,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Import Administration.
[FR Doc. E5-3596 Filed 6-7-05; 8:45 am]
Billing Code: 3510-DS-S