Certain Stainless Steel Butt-Weld Pipe Fittings from Taiwan: Notice of Court Decision and Suspension of Liquidation, 38103 [E5-3473]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 126 / Friday, July 1, 2005 / Notices
including the requested partial
revocation of the dumping order with
´
respect to Asociacion de Cooperativas
Argentinas.
Therefore, the Department is
extending the time limit for completion
of the preliminary results until
December 20, 2005, in accordance with
section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act. The
deadline for the final results of this
review will continue to be 120 days
after publication of the preliminary
results.
Dated: June 27, 2005.
Barbara E. Tillman,
Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration.
[FR Doc. E5–3470 Filed 6–30–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–583–816]
Certain Stainless Steel Butt–Weld Pipe
Fittings from Taiwan: Notice of Court
Decision and Suspension of
Liquidation
Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On June 14, 2005, in Alloy
Piping Products, Inc., Flowline
Division, et al. v. United States, Slip Op.
05–69, (‘‘Alloy Piping II’’), the Court of
International Trade (‘‘CIT’’) affirmed the
Department of Commerce’s (the
‘‘Department’’) Final Results of
Determination Pursuant to Remand
(‘‘Remand Results’’), dated February 14,
2005. Consistent with the decision of
the U.S. Court of Appeals for the
Federal Circuit (‘‘CAFC’’) in Timken Co.
v. United States, 893 F.2d 337 (Fed. Cir.
1990) (‘‘Timken’’), the Department will
continue to order the suspension of
liquidation of the subject merchandise,
where appropriate, until there is a
‘‘conclusive’’ decision in this case. If the
case is not appealed, or if it is affirmed
on appeal, the Department will instruct
U.S. Customs and Border Protection
(‘‘Customs’’) to liquidate all relevant
entries from Ta Chen Stainless Steel
Pipe, Ltd. (‘‘Ta Chen’’) and revise the
cash deposit rates as appropriate.
EFFECTIVE DATE: July 1, 2005.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Alex
Villanueva, AD/CVD Operations, Office
9, Import Administration, International
Trade Administration, U.S. Department
of Commerce, 1401 Constitution
Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230,
telephone 202–482–3208, fax 202–482–
9089.
AGENCY:
VerDate jul<14>2003
18:11 Jun 30, 2005
Jkt 205001
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Following publication of the Final
Results, Alloy Piping Products, Inc.,
Flowline Division, Markovitz
Enterprises, Inc., Gerlin Inc., and Taylor
Forge Stainless Inc., (the ‘‘Petitioners’’)
and Ta Chen, filed a lawsuit with the
CIT challenging the Department’s
findings in Certain Stainless Steel Butt–
Weld Pipe Fittings From Taiwan and
Accompanying Issues and Decisions
Memorandum; Final Results of 1999–
2000 Administrative Review, 66 FR
65899, 65900 (December 21, 2001)
(‘‘Final Results’’). In Alloy Piping v.
United States, Slip Op. 04–134, (CIT
2004) (‘‘Alloy Piping I’’), the CIT
instructed the Department to (1) reopen
the record, seek additional relevant
information regarding employee
bonuses, and recalculate the general and
administrative (‘‘G&A’’) expenses of Ta
Chen; and (2) reconsider Ta Chen’s U.S.
indirect selling expenses and to account
for all of Ta Chen’s U.S. selling
expenses incurred during fiscal year
1999. Specifically, regarding employee
bonuses, the CIT instructed the
Department to consider employee
bonuses distributed directly from
shareholders’ equity, and paid by the
company to its employees and
management in its recalculation of the
G&A expenses;
The Draft Final Results Pursuant to
Remand (‘‘Draft Results’’) were released
to parties on January 27, 2005. The
Department received comments from
interested parties on the Draft Results
on February 1, 2005. There were no
substantive changes made to the
Remand Results as a result of comments
received on the Draft Results. On
February 14, 2005, the Department
responded to the CIT’s Order of Remand
by filing the Remand Results. In its
Remand Results, the Department
reopened the record, sought additional
relevant information regarding
employee bonuses and recalculated the
G&A expenses of Ta Chen to include
bonuses to both employees and
directors/supervisors. The Department
also reconsidered Ta Chen’s U.S.
indirect selling expenses and
determined that there was no need to
add financial interest expenses to Ta
Chen’s U.S. indirect selling expenses.
Thus, the Department did not change Ta
Chen’s U.S. indirect selling expenses.
As a result of the remand
determination, the antidumping duty
rate for Ta Chen was decreased from
6.11 to 6.10 percent. The CIT did not
receive comments from either the
Petitioners or Ta Chen.
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
38103
On June 14, 2005, the CIT affirmed
the Department’s findings in the
Remand Results. Specifically, the CIT
upheld the Department reopening the
record, seeking additional relevant
information regarding employee
bonuses, and recalculating the G&A
expenses of Ta Chen and reconsidering
Ta Chen’s U.S. indirect selling
expenses. See Alloy Piping II.
The only revisions made to the Final
Results were revisions to the calculation
of Ta Chen’s G&A expenses, as noted
above. This revision resulted in a
change in Ta Chen’s margin.
Suspension of Liquidation
The CAFC, in Timken, held that the
Department must publish notice of a
decision of the CIT or the CAFC which
is not ‘‘in harmony’’ with the
Department’s final determination or
results. Publication of this notice fulfills
that obligation. The CAFC also held that
the Department must suspend
liquidation of the subject merchandise
until there is a ‘‘conclusive’’ decision in
the case. Therefore, pursuant to Timken,
the Department must continue to
suspend liquidation pending the
expiration of the period to appeal the
CIT’s June 14, 2005, decision, or, if that
decision is appealed, pending a final
decision by the CAFC. The Department
will instruct Customs to revise cash
deposit rates, as appropriate, and to
liquidate relevant entries covering the
subject merchandise effective (insert
date of FR publication), in the event that
the CIT’s ruling is not appealed, or if
appealed and upheld by the CAFC.
Dated: June 24, 2005.
Joseph A. Spetrini,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration.
[FR Doc. E5–3473 Filed 6–30–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
Renewable Energy Trade Mission
International Trade
Administration, Department of
Commerce.
ACTION: Notice to Renewable Energy
Trade Mission to Brazil, October 17–19,
2005.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The United States Department
of Commerce, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Commercial
Service is organizing a Renewable
Energy Trade Mission to Brazil, October
17–19, 2005, to help U.S. firms find
business partners and sell renewable
E:\FR\FM\01JYN1.SGM
01JYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 126 (Friday, July 1, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 38103]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E5-3473]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-583-816]
Certain Stainless Steel Butt-Weld Pipe Fittings from Taiwan:
Notice of Court Decision and Suspension of Liquidation
AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On June 14, 2005, in Alloy Piping Products, Inc., Flowline
Division, et al. v. United States, Slip Op. 05-69, (``Alloy Piping
II''), the Court of International Trade (``CIT'') affirmed the
Department of Commerce's (the ``Department'') Final Results of
Determination Pursuant to Remand (``Remand Results''), dated February
14, 2005. Consistent with the decision of the U.S. Court of Appeals for
the Federal Circuit (``CAFC'') in Timken Co. v. United States, 893 F.2d
337 (Fed. Cir. 1990) (``Timken''), the Department will continue to
order the suspension of liquidation of the subject merchandise, where
appropriate, until there is a ``conclusive'' decision in this case. If
the case is not appealed, or if it is affirmed on appeal, the
Department will instruct U.S. Customs and Border Protection
(``Customs'') to liquidate all relevant entries from Ta Chen Stainless
Steel Pipe, Ltd. (``Ta Chen'') and revise the cash deposit rates as
appropriate.
EFFECTIVE DATE: July 1, 2005.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Alex Villanueva, AD/CVD Operations,
Office 9, Import Administration, International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington,
DC 20230, telephone 202-482-3208, fax 202-482-9089.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Following publication of the Final Results, Alloy Piping Products,
Inc., Flowline Division, Markovitz Enterprises, Inc., Gerlin Inc., and
Taylor Forge Stainless Inc., (the ``Petitioners'') and Ta Chen, filed a
lawsuit with the CIT challenging the Department's findings in Certain
Stainless Steel Butt-Weld Pipe Fittings From Taiwan and Accompanying
Issues and Decisions Memorandum; Final Results of 1999-2000
Administrative Review, 66 FR 65899, 65900 (December 21, 2001) (``Final
Results''). In Alloy Piping v. United States, Slip Op. 04-134, (CIT
2004) (``Alloy Piping I''), the CIT instructed the Department to (1)
reopen the record, seek additional relevant information regarding
employee bonuses, and recalculate the general and administrative
(``G&A'') expenses of Ta Chen; and (2) reconsider Ta Chen's U.S.
indirect selling expenses and to account for all of Ta Chen's U.S.
selling expenses incurred during fiscal year 1999. Specifically,
regarding employee bonuses, the CIT instructed the Department to
consider employee bonuses distributed directly from shareholders'
equity, and paid by the company to its employees and management in its
recalculation of the G&A expenses;
The Draft Final Results Pursuant to Remand (``Draft Results'') were
released to parties on January 27, 2005. The Department received
comments from interested parties on the Draft Results on February 1,
2005. There were no substantive changes made to the Remand Results as a
result of comments received on the Draft Results. On February 14, 2005,
the Department responded to the CIT's Order of Remand by filing the
Remand Results. In its Remand Results, the Department reopened the
record, sought additional relevant information regarding employee
bonuses and recalculated the G&A expenses of Ta Chen to include bonuses
to both employees and directors/supervisors. The Department also
reconsidered Ta Chen's U.S. indirect selling expenses and determined
that there was no need to add financial interest expenses to Ta Chen's
U.S. indirect selling expenses. Thus, the Department did not change Ta
Chen's U.S. indirect selling expenses.
As a result of the remand determination, the antidumping duty rate
for Ta Chen was decreased from 6.11 to 6.10 percent. The CIT did not
receive comments from either the Petitioners or Ta Chen.
On June 14, 2005, the CIT affirmed the Department's findings in the
Remand Results. Specifically, the CIT upheld the Department reopening
the record, seeking additional relevant information regarding employee
bonuses, and recalculating the G&A expenses of Ta Chen and
reconsidering Ta Chen's U.S. indirect selling expenses. See Alloy
Piping II.
The only revisions made to the Final Results were revisions to the
calculation of Ta Chen's G&A expenses, as noted above. This revision
resulted in a change in Ta Chen's margin.
Suspension of Liquidation
The CAFC, in Timken, held that the Department must publish notice
of a decision of the CIT or the CAFC which is not ``in harmony'' with
the Department's final determination or results. Publication of this
notice fulfills that obligation. The CAFC also held that the Department
must suspend liquidation of the subject merchandise until there is a
``conclusive'' decision in the case. Therefore, pursuant to Timken, the
Department must continue to suspend liquidation pending the expiration
of the period to appeal the CIT's June 14, 2005, decision, or, if that
decision is appealed, pending a final decision by the CAFC. The
Department will instruct Customs to revise cash deposit rates, as
appropriate, and to liquidate relevant entries covering the subject
merchandise effective (insert date of FR publication), in the event
that the CIT's ruling is not appealed, or if appealed and upheld by the
CAFC.
Dated: June 24, 2005.
Joseph A. Spetrini,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Import Administration.
[FR Doc. E5-3473 Filed 6-30-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-S