Self-Regulatory Organizations; National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc.; Notice of Filing of Proposed Rule Change and Amendment No. 1 Thereto To Create an Enterprise License Fee for the TotalView Entitlement, 37144-37145 [E5-3348]
Download as PDF
37144
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 123 / Tuesday, June 28, 2005 / Notices
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s Internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an e-mail to rulecomments@sec.gov. Please include File
Number SR-MSRB–2005–08 on the
subject line.
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Jonathan G. Katz, Secretary,
Securities and Exchange Commission,
Station Place, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549–9303.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR-MSRB–2005–08. This file
number should be included on the
subject line if e-mail is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for inspection and copying in
the Commission’s Public Reference
Room. Copies of such filing also will be
available for inspection and copying at
the MSRB’s offices. All comments
received will be posted without change;
the Commission does not edit personal
identifying information from
submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make
available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR-MSRB–
2005–08 and should be submitted on or
before July 19, 2005.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Market Regulation, pursuant to delegated
authority.8
Jill M. Peterson,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. E5–3346 Filed 6–27–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–51869: File No. SR–NASD–
2005–051]
Self-Regulatory Organizations;
National Association of Securities
Dealers, Inc.; Notice of Filing of
Proposed Rule Change and
Amendment No. 1 Thereto To Create
an Enterprise License Fee for the
TotalView Entitlement
June 17, 2005
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on April 13,
2005, the National Association of
Securities Dealers, Inc. (‘‘NASD’’),
through its subsidiary, The Nasdaq
Stock Market, Inc. (‘‘Nasdaq’’), filed
with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (‘‘Commission’’) the
proposed rule change as described in
Items I, II, and III below, which Items
have been prepared by Nasdaq. On June
3, 2005, Nasdaq amended the proposed
rule change. The Commission is
publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change,
as amended, from interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
Nasdaq proposes to modify NASD
Rule 7010(q)(1)(A) to establish an
enterprise license option for the
TotalView entitlement. The text of the
proposed rule change is set forth below.
Proposed additions are in italics;
proposed deletions are in [brackets].3
*
*
*
*
*
7010. System Services
(a)–(p) No change
(q) Nasdaq TotalView
(1) No Change.
(A) (i) Except as provided in
(q)(1)(A)(ii) and (iii), for the TotalView
entitlement there shall be a $70 monthly
charge for each controlled device.
(ii) Except as provided in (q)(1)(A)(iii),
a non-professional subscriber, as
defined in Rule 7010(e), shall pay $14
per month for each controlled device.
(iii) As an alternative to (q)(1)(A)(i)
and (ii), a broker-dealer distributor may
purchase an enterprise license at a rate
of $25,000 for non-professional
subscribers or $100,000 per month for
1 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
CFR 240.19b–4.
3 The proposed changes are marked from NASD
Rule 7010 as it appears in the NASD Manual
available at www.nasd.com.
2 17
8 17
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
VerDate jul<14>2003
16:46 Jun 27, 2005
Jkt 205001
PO 00000
Frm 00070
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
both professional and non-professional
subscribers. The enterprise license
entitles a distributor to provide
TotalView to an unlimited number of
internal users, whether such users
receive the data directly or through
third-party vendors, and external users
with whom the firm has a brokerage
relationship. The enterprise license
shall not apply to relevant Level 1 and
NQDS fees.
(B)–(C) No Change.
(2)–(4) No change
(r)–(v) No Change.
*
*
*
*
*
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission,
Nasdaq included statements concerning
the purpose of and basis for the
proposed rule change, as amended, and
discussed any comments it received on
the proposed rule change. The text of
these statements may be examined at
the places specified in Item IV below.
Nasdaq has prepared summaries, set
forth in Sections A, B, and C below, of
the most significant aspects of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
1. Purpose
Nasdaq continues to seek broader
distribution of its TotalView data
entitlement to facilitate broader
exposure of orders in the Nasdaq Market
Center and improve customer execution
quality. To facilitate this objective,
Nasdaq is seeking ways to reduce the
cost of providing TotalView data to
large numbers of a broker-dealer’s
customer base. In addition, as many
brokers augment their traditional
institutional customer relationship tools
with one or more electronic software
applications, the need to provide costefficient market data on those
applications has become increasingly
important.
Accordingly, Nasdaq proposes to
establish a program whereby a brokerdealer distributor could obtain an
enterprise license for the distribution of
the TotalView market data entitlement
for a fixed cost of either $25,000 per
month for non-professional subscribers
or of $100,000 per month for brokerdealer distributors that serve both nonprofessional and professional
subscribers. This enterprise license
pricing structure would mirror the
pricing structure already established for
E:\FR\FM\28JNN1.SGM
28JNN1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 123 / Tuesday, June 28, 2005 / Notices
individual professional and nonprofessional subscribers.
This program would only be available
to broker-dealers registered under the
Act, and would cover all TotalView
usage fees with respect to both internal
usage and re-distribution to customers
with whom the firm has a brokerage
relationship.4 Non-broker-dealer
vendors and application service
providers would not be eligible for the
enterprise license, as such firms
typically pass through the cost of market
data user fees to their customers. This
would enable firms to incorporate
TotalView data into the software
applications they make available to their
institutional and retail customers,
without providing them the opportunity
to re-distribute TotalView data in
competition with pure vendors.
The enterprise license would cover
fees for TotalView data received directly
from Nasdaq as well as data received
from third-party vendors (e.g.,
Bloomberg, Reuters, etc.). Upon signing
up for the program, the relevant firm
would be entitled to inform any thirdparty market data vendor they utilize
(through a Nasdaq-provided form) that,
going forward, any TotalView data
usage by the broker-dealer may be
reported to Nasdaq on a non-billable
basis. Such a structure attempts to
address a long-standing concern that
broker-dealers are over-billed for market
data consumed by one person through
multiple market-data display devices.
At the same time, the proposed billing
structure would continue to provide
Nasdaq with accurate reporting
information for purposes of usage
monitoring and auditing.
2. Statutory Basis
Nasdaq believes that the proposed
rule change, as amended, is consistent
with the provisions of Section 15A of
the Act,5 in general, and with Section
15A(b)(5) of the Act,6 in particular, in
that the incorporation of an enterprise
license for user fees under the
TotalView entitlement provides for the
equitable allocation of reasonable
charges among the persons distributing
and purchasing this information.
Nasdaq believes that the proposed
pricing structure would provide
meaningful cost controls to brokers,
who typically absorb user fees, seeking
to broadly distribute TotalView data to
their customers, while preventing them
from using such a license to gain an
4 Distributors
who utilize the enterprise license
would still be liable for the applicable distributor
fees.
5 15 U.S.C. 78o–3.
6 15 U.S.C. 78o–3(b)(5).
VerDate jul<14>2003
16:46 Jun 27, 2005
Jkt 205001
unfair competitive advantage over pure
application vendors, who typically pass
such costs through. Nasdaq further
believes that this rule change would
encourage the broader redistribution of
the Nasdaq Market Center depth of book
order information, thus improving
transparency and thereby benefit the
investing public.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
Nasdaq does not believe that the
proposed rule change, as amended,
would result in any burden on
competition that is not necessary or
appropriate in furtherance of the
purposes of the Act.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants or Others
Written comments were neither
solicited nor received.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
Within 35 days of the date of
publication of this notice in the Federal
Register or within such longer period (i)
as the Commission may designate up to
90 days of such date if it finds such
longer period to be appropriate and
publishes its reasons for so finding or
(ii) as to which the self-regulatory
organization consents, the Commission
will:
A. By order approve such proposed
rule change, as amended, or
B. Institute proceedings to determine
whether the proposed rule change, as
amended, should be disapproved.
37145
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–NASD–2005–051. This file
number should be included on the
subject line if e-mail is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for inspection and copying in
the Commission’s Public Reference
Room. Copies of the filing also will be
available for inspection and copying at
the principal office of the NASD. All
comments received will be posted
without change; the Commission does
not edit personal identifying
information from submissions. You
should submit only information that
you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File
Number SR–NASD–2005–051 and
should be submitted on or before July
19, 2005.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Market Regulation, pursuant to delegated
authority.7
Jill M. Peterson,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. E5–3348 Filed 6–27–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010–01–P
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change, as amended, is consistent with
the Act. Comments may be submitted by
any of the following methods:
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s Internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an e-mail to rulecomments@sec.gov. Please include File
Number SR–NASD–2005–051 on the
subject line.
Paper Comments
Send paper comments in triplicate to
Jonathan G. Katz, Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F
Street, NE., Washington, DC 20549–
9303.
PO 00000
Frm 00071
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
UNITED STATES SENTENCING
COMMISSION
Sentencing Guidelines for United
States Courts
United States Sentencing
Commission.
ACTION: Notice of proposed priorities.
Request for public comment.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: As part of its statutory
authority and responsibility to analyze
sentencing issues, including operation
of the Federal sentencing guidelines,
and in accordance with Rule 5.2 of its
Rules of Practice and Procedure, the
Commission is seeking comment on
possible priority policy issues for the
amendment cycle ending May 1, 2006.
DATES: Public comment should be
received on or before August 15, 2005.
7 17
E:\FR\FM\28JNN1.SGM
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
28JNN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 123 (Tuesday, June 28, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 37144-37145]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E5-3348]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-51869: File No. SR-NASD-2005-051]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; National Association of Securities
Dealers, Inc.; Notice of Filing of Proposed Rule Change and Amendment
No. 1 Thereto To Create an Enterprise License Fee for the TotalView
Entitlement
June 17, 2005
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(the ``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given
that on April 13, 2005, the National Association of Securities Dealers,
Inc. (``NASD''), through its subsidiary, The Nasdaq Stock Market, Inc.
(``Nasdaq''), filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II,
and III below, which Items have been prepared by Nasdaq. On June 3,
2005, Nasdaq amended the proposed rule change. The Commission is
publishing this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change,
as amended, from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
Nasdaq proposes to modify NASD Rule 7010(q)(1)(A) to establish an
enterprise license option for the TotalView entitlement. The text of
the proposed rule change is set forth below. Proposed additions are in
italics; proposed deletions are in [brackets].\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ The proposed changes are marked from NASD Rule 7010 as it
appears in the NASD Manual available at www.nasd.com.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
7010. System Services
(a)-(p) No change
(q) Nasdaq TotalView
(1) No Change.
(A) (i) Except as provided in (q)(1)(A)(ii) and (iii), for the
TotalView entitlement there shall be a $70 monthly charge for each
controlled device.
(ii) Except as provided in (q)(1)(A)(iii), a non-professional
subscriber, as defined in Rule 7010(e), shall pay $14 per month for
each controlled device.
(iii) As an alternative to (q)(1)(A)(i) and (ii), a broker-dealer
distributor may purchase an enterprise license at a rate of $25,000 for
non-professional subscribers or $100,000 per month for both
professional and non-professional subscribers. The enterprise license
entitles a distributor to provide TotalView to an unlimited number of
internal users, whether such users receive the data directly or through
third-party vendors, and external users with whom the firm has a
brokerage relationship. The enterprise license shall not apply to
relevant Level 1 and NQDS fees.
(B)-(C) No Change.
(2)-(4) No change
(r)-(v) No Change.
* * * * *
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, Nasdaq included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change, as
amended, and discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule
change. The text of these statements may be examined at the places
specified in Item IV below. Nasdaq has prepared summaries, set forth in
Sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
1. Purpose
Nasdaq continues to seek broader distribution of its TotalView data
entitlement to facilitate broader exposure of orders in the Nasdaq
Market Center and improve customer execution quality. To facilitate
this objective, Nasdaq is seeking ways to reduce the cost of providing
TotalView data to large numbers of a broker-dealer's customer base. In
addition, as many brokers augment their traditional institutional
customer relationship tools with one or more electronic software
applications, the need to provide cost-efficient market data on those
applications has become increasingly important.
Accordingly, Nasdaq proposes to establish a program whereby a
broker-dealer distributor could obtain an enterprise license for the
distribution of the TotalView market data entitlement for a fixed cost
of either $25,000 per month for non-professional subscribers or of
$100,000 per month for broker-dealer distributors that serve both non-
professional and professional subscribers. This enterprise license
pricing structure would mirror the pricing structure already
established for
[[Page 37145]]
individual professional and non-professional subscribers.
This program would only be available to broker-dealers registered
under the Act, and would cover all TotalView usage fees with respect to
both internal usage and re-distribution to customers with whom the firm
has a brokerage relationship.\4\ Non-broker-dealer vendors and
application service providers would not be eligible for the enterprise
license, as such firms typically pass through the cost of market data
user fees to their customers. This would enable firms to incorporate
TotalView data into the software applications they make available to
their institutional and retail customers, without providing them the
opportunity to re-distribute TotalView data in competition with pure
vendors.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ Distributors who utilize the enterprise license would still
be liable for the applicable distributor fees.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The enterprise license would cover fees for TotalView data received
directly from Nasdaq as well as data received from third-party vendors
(e.g., Bloomberg, Reuters, etc.). Upon signing up for the program, the
relevant firm would be entitled to inform any third-party market data
vendor they utilize (through a Nasdaq-provided form) that, going
forward, any TotalView data usage by the broker-dealer may be reported
to Nasdaq on a non-billable basis. Such a structure attempts to address
a long-standing concern that broker-dealers are over-billed for market
data consumed by one person through multiple market-data display
devices. At the same time, the proposed billing structure would
continue to provide Nasdaq with accurate reporting information for
purposes of usage monitoring and auditing.
2. Statutory Basis
Nasdaq believes that the proposed rule change, as amended, is
consistent with the provisions of Section 15A of the Act,\5\ in
general, and with Section 15A(b)(5) of the Act,\6\ in particular, in
that the incorporation of an enterprise license for user fees under the
TotalView entitlement provides for the equitable allocation of
reasonable charges among the persons distributing and purchasing this
information. Nasdaq believes that the proposed pricing structure would
provide meaningful cost controls to brokers, who typically absorb user
fees, seeking to broadly distribute TotalView data to their customers,
while preventing them from using such a license to gain an unfair
competitive advantage over pure application vendors, who typically pass
such costs through. Nasdaq further believes that this rule change would
encourage the broader redistribution of the Nasdaq Market Center depth
of book order information, thus improving transparency and thereby
benefit the investing public.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ 15 U.S.C. 78o-3.
\6\ 15 U.S.C. 78o-3(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
Nasdaq does not believe that the proposed rule change, as amended,
would result in any burden on competition that is not necessary or
appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants or Others
Written comments were neither solicited nor received.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
Within 35 days of the date of publication of this notice in the
Federal Register or within such longer period (i) as the Commission may
designate up to 90 days of such date if it finds such longer period to
be appropriate and publishes its reasons for so finding or (ii) as to
which the self-regulatory organization consents, the Commission will:
A. By order approve such proposed rule change, as amended, or
B. Institute proceedings to determine whether the proposed rule
change, as amended, should be disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change, as amended, is consistent with the Act. Comments may be
submitted by any of the following methods:
Electronic Comments
Use the Commission's Internet comment form (https://
www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
Send an e-mail to rule-comments@sec.gov. Please include
File Number SR-NASD-2005-051 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
Send paper comments in triplicate to Jonathan G. Katz, Secretary,
Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC
20549-9303.
All submissions should refer to File Number SR-NASD-2005-051. This
file number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used.
To help the Commission process and review your comments more
efficiently, please use only one method. The Commission will post all
comments on the Commission's Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments,
all written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that
are filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating
to the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person,
other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance
with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for inspection
and copying in the Commission's Public Reference Room. Copies of the
filing also will be available for inspection and copying at the
principal office of the NASD. All comments received will be posted
without change; the Commission does not edit personal identifying
information from submissions. You should submit only information that
you wish to make available publicly. All submissions should refer to
File Number SR-NASD-2005-051 and should be submitted on or before July
19, 2005.
For the Commission, by the Division of Market Regulation,
pursuant to delegated authority.\7\
\7\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jill M. Peterson,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. E5-3348 Filed 6-27-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-P