Combating Exploitive Child Labor Through Education in Ecuador, 36949-36963 [05-12633]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 122 / Monday, June 27, 2005 / Notices
By order of the Commission.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 05–12628 Filed 6–24–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Executive Office for United States
Trustees; Agency Information
Collection Activities: Proposed
Collection; Comments Requested
60–Day Emergency Notice of
Information Collection Under Review:
Application for Approval as a Nonprofit
Budget and Credit Counseling Agency.
ACTION:
This notice is published to correct the
agency contact information for public
comments, published in the Federal
Register notice on June 17, 2005,
Volume 70, Number 116, on page 35302.
All comments and suggestions, or
questions regarding additional
information, to include obtaining a copy
of the proposed information collection
instrument with instructions, should be
directed to Mark Neal, Assistant United
States Trustee, Executive Office for
United States Trustees, Department of
Justice, 20 Massachusetts Avenue, NW.,
Suite 8000, Washington, DC 20530, or
by facsimile at (202) 307–2397.
If additional information is required
contact: Brenda E. Dyer, Department
Clearance Officer, United States
Department of Justice, Justice
Management Division, Policy and
Planning Staff, Patrick Henry Building,
Suite 1600, 601 D Street, NW.,
Washington, DC 20530.
Dated: June 21, 2005.
Brenda E. Dyer,
Department Clearance Officer, Department of
Justice.
[FR Doc. 05–12641 Filed 6–24–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–40–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Office of the Secretary
Combating Exploitive Child Labor
Through Education in Ecuador
Bureau of International Labor
Affairs, Department of Labor.
Announcement Type: New. Notice of
Availability of Funds and Solicitation
for Cooperative Agreement
Applications.
Funding Opportunity Number: SGA
05–06.
Catalog of Federal Domestic
Assistance (CFDA) Number: Not
applicable.
AGENCY:
VerDate jul<14>2003
18:11 Jun 24, 2005
Jkt 205001
Key Dates: Deadline for Submission of
Application is August 11, 2005.
SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of
Labor, Bureau of International Labor
Affairs, will award up to U.S. $4 million
through one or more cooperative
agreements to an organization or
organizations to improve access to and
quality of education programs as a
means to combat exploitive child labor
among indigenous children in Ecuador.
Projects funded under this solicitation
will provide educational and training
opportunities to indigenous children as
a means of removing and/or preventing
them from engaging in exploitive work
or the worst forms of child labor. The
activities funded will complement and
expand upon existing projects and
programs to improve basic education in
the country of interest. Applications
must respond to the entire Statement of
Work outlined in this solicitation. In
Ecuador, activities under these
cooperative agreements will provide the
direct delivery of quality basic
education to indigenous working
children and those at risk of entering
work, and will result in their
enrollment, persistence, and completion
of an education or training program.
I. Funding Opportunity Description
The U.S. Department of Labor
(USDOL), Bureau of International Labor
Affairs (ILAB), announces the
availability of funds to be awarded by
cooperative agreement to one or more
qualifying organizations for the purpose
of expanding access to and quality of
basic education and strengthening
government and civil society’s capacity
to address the education needs of
indigenous working children and those
at risk of entering work in Ecuador. The
overall purpose of USDOL’s Child Labor
Education Initiative, as consistently
enunciated in USDOL appropriations
FY 2000 through FY 2005, is to work
toward the elimination of the worst
forms of child labor through the
provision of basic education.
Accordingly, entities applying under
this solicitation must develop and
implement strategies for the prevention
and withdrawal of children from the
worst forms of child labor, consistent
with this purpose. ILAB is authorized to
award and administer this program by
the Consolidated Appropriations Act,
2005, Pub. L. 108–447, 118 Stat. 2809
(2004). The cooperative agreement or
cooperative agreements awarded under
this initiative will be managed by
ILAB’s International Child Labor
Program (ICLP) to ensure achievement
of the stated goals. Applicants are
encouraged to be creative in proposing
PO 00000
Frm 00034
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
36949
cost-effective interventions that will
have a demonstrable impact in
promoting school attendance and
completion in the geographical areas
where children are engaging in or are
most at risk of engaging in the worst
forms of child labor.
1. Background and Program Scope
A. USDOL Support of Global
Elimination of Exploitive Child Labor
The International Labor Organization
(ILO) estimated that 211 million
children ages 5 to 14 were working
around the world in 2000. Full-time
child workers are generally unable to
attend school, and part-time child
laborers balance economic survival with
schooling from an early age, often to the
detriment of their education. Since
1995, USDOL has provided close to U.S.
$400 million in technical assistance
funding to combat exploitive child labor
in approximately 70 countries around
the world.
Programs funded by USDOL range
from targeted action programs in
specific sectors to more comprehensive
efforts that target the worst forms of
child labor as defined by ILO
Convention 182. Convention 182 lists
four categories of the worst forms of
child labor, and calls for their
immediate elimination:
• All forms of slavery or practices
similar to slavery, such as the sale and
trafficking of children; debt bondage
and serfdom and forced or compulsory
labor; including forced or compulsory
recruitment of children for use in armed
conflict;
• The use, procurement or offering of
a child for prostitution, production of
pornography or pornographic
performances;
• The use, procurement or offering of
a child for illicit activities in particular
for the production and trafficking of
drugs as defined in the relevant
international treaties;
• Work which by its nature or by the
circumstances by which it is carried out,
is likely to harm the health, safety, and
morals of children.
In determining the types of work
likely to harm the health, safety and
morals of children, Recommendation
190 to Convention 182 considers the
following: work which exposes a child
to physical, psychological or sexual
abuse; work underground, underwater,
at dangerous heights or in confined
workplaces; work with dangerous
machinery, equipment and tools or
handling or transporting heavy loads;
work in an unhealthy environment
including exposure to hazardous
substances, agents or processes, or to
E:\FR\FM\27JNN1.SGM
27JNN1
36950
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 122 / Monday, June 27, 2005 / Notices
temperatures, noise levels or vibrations
damaging to the health; work for long
hours or night work where the child is
unreasonably confined to the premises.
From FY 2001 to FY 2005, the U.S.
Congress has appropriated over US $180
million to USDOL for a Child Labor
Education Initiative to fund programs
aimed at increasing access to quality,
basic education in areas with a high
incidence of abusive and exploitive
child labor. The cooperative
agreement(s) awarded under this
solicitation will be funded through this
initiative.
USDOL’s Child Labor Education
Initiative seeks to nurture the
development, health, safety and
enhanced future employability of
children around the world by increasing
access to and quality of basic education
for working children and those at risk of
entering work. The elimination of
exploitive child labor depends, to a
large extent, on improving access to,
quality of, and relevance of education.
In addition to providing direct
education and training opportunities to
working children and those at risk of
engaging in exploitive work, the Child
Labor Education Initiative has four
goals:
i. Raise awareness of the importance
of education for all children and
mobilize a wide array of actors to
improve and expand education
infrastructures;
ii. Strengthen formal and transitional
education systems that encourage
working children and those at risk of
working to attend school;
iii. Strengthen national institutions
and policies on education and child
labor; and
iv. Ensure the long-term sustainability
of these efforts.
B. Barriers to Education for Working
Children, Country Background, and
Focus of Solicitation
Throughout the world, there are
complex causes of exploitive child labor
as well as barriers to education for
children engaging in or at risk of
engaging in exploitive child labor.
These include: poverty; education
system barriers; infrastructure barriers;
legal and policy barriers; resource gaps;
institutional barriers; informational
gaps; demographic characteristics of
children and/or families; cultural and
traditional practices; and weak labor
markets and enforcement.
Although these elements and
characteristics tend to exist throughout
the world in areas with a high incidence
of exploitive child labor, they manifest
themselves in specific ways in Ecuador.
Therefore, specific, targeted
VerDate jul<14>2003
18:11 Jun 24, 2005
Jkt 205001
interventions are required. The project
must provide or facilitate the delivery of
educational services to at risk or
working indigenous children, support
the collection of data on this target
population, and build the capacity of
national institutions to address child
labor and education issues for
indigenous children.
A recent report by the International
Labor Organization’s International
Program on the Elimination of Child
Labor (ILO/IPEC) on indigenous and
tribal children (cited below) indicates
that indigenous children in Latin
America are twice as likely to work as
their non-indigenous peers, including in
the worst forms of child labor.
Removing indigenous children from this
type of work and providing them with
educational opportunities poses many
challenges, which include addressing
issues of ethnicity and multiculturalism,
poverty, marginalization, and lack of
access that indigenous groups have
historically had to many rights of
citizenship. This solicitation seeks
project strategies that provide
innovative, constructive approaches to
address the barriers faced by indigenous
children, and successful models to
remove them from exploitive child labor
and provide them with access to quality
education.
For this project, applicants must be
able to identify the specific barriers to
education and the education needs of
specific children targeted in their
project (e.g., children withdrawn from
work, children at high risk of dropping
out of school and joining the labor force,
and/or children still working in a
particular sector) and how direct
education service delivery, capacity
building and policy change can be used
to address particular barriers and needs.
Brief background information on
education and exploitive child labor in
Ecuador is provided below.
For additional information on child
labor and education for indigenous
children and exploitive child labor in
Ecuador, applicants are strongly
encouraged to refer to Indigenous and
tribal children: Assessing child labour
and education challenges. Larsen, Peter
Billie. ILO/IPEC/COOP INDISCO. Child
Labour and Education Working Paper,
June 2003 and The Department of
Labor’s 2003 Findings on the Worst
Forms of Child Labor available at
https://www.ilo.org/public/english/
standards/ipec/publ/download/
edu_indigenous_2003_en.pdf and
https://www.dol.gov/ILAB/media/
reports/iclp/tda2003/overview.htm or in
hard copy from Lisa Harvey, U.S.
Department of Labor, Procurement
Services Center, telephone (202) 693–
PO 00000
Frm 00035
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
4570 (this is not a toll-free-number) or
e-mail: harvey.lisa@dol.gov.
Barriers to Education for Indigenous
Working Children in Ecuador
In 2002, the ILO estimated that 3.9
percent of children ages 10 to 14 years
in Ecuador were working. A large
percentage of working children between
the ages of 5 and 17 years are found in
rural areas of the sierra, or highlands,
followed by the Amazon and urban
coastal areas. In rural areas, young
children are often found performing
unpaid agricultural labor for their
families. Children as young as 8 years of
age have been found working under
hazardous conditions on banana
plantations and in the cut-flower sector.
The migration of the rural poor to cities
has increased the incidence of child
labor in urban areas where children
work in commerce and services, as
messengers and domestics, and in the
informal sector. The commercial sexual
exploitation of children also occurs in
Ecuador.
Ecuador is home to 27 indigenous
nationalities and peoples, the majority
of whom live in the highlands and the
Amazon regions. According to the
National Committee on the Progressive
Eradication of Child Labor (CONEPTI),
approximately 17 percent of working
children in Ecuador belong to an
indigenous group, and 72 percent of
indigenous children work before the age
of 15 (as compared to 54 percent of nonindigenous children).
The Ecuadorian Constitution requires
that all children attend school until they
achieve a basic nine years of education,
but multiple barriers may not allow
children to achieve this level. Families
often face significant education-related
expenses such as fees and transportation
costs. Inequitable classroom coverage
between primary and secondary levels,
poor teaching quality, sparse teaching
materials, a short school day and the
inefficient distribution of human,
financial and teaching resources are also
problems within the educational
system. For indigenous communities
who have often been deprived of access
to education, schools, including those
that provide bilingual (SpanishQuechua) intercultural education, are
symbolically important and desired,
even though indigenous children who
attend them may also work.
Ecuador has a number of national and
donor-supported programs to address
child labor and education, and others to
focus on the needs of indigenous
populations. The Government of
Ecuador, through CONEPTI, oversees its
National Plan for the Progressive
Elimination of Child Labor 2003–2006
E:\FR\FM\27JNN1.SGM
27JNN1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 122 / Monday, June 27, 2005 / Notices
as part of its commitment to ratifying
ILO Convention No. 182 on the Worst
Forms of Child Labor. The government
has identified six sectors as priorities for
the progressive elimination of child
labor: Mining, garbage dumps,
construction, flower production, banana
production and commercial sexual
exploitation. USDOL has funded a
number of child labor and education
projects in Ecuador.
There are a number of Ecuadorian
government programs such as the
National Council on Children and
Adolescents, and the National Child and
Family Institute (INNFA) to address
children’s issues, reintegrate working
children and adolescents into the school
system, and provide vocational training.
Various government programs under
different ministries and the Central
Bank, often supported by donors such as
the World Food Program and United
Nations Development Program (UNDP),
include school feeding, educational
stipends and scholarships, vocational
training and shelters for exploited
children. A U.S. $200 million IDB loan
for a Social Sector Reform Program
supports the government’s plan to
coordinate and improve fragmented
social spending and channel it through
a Child Development Fund. A similar
fund will be created for school feeding
and food/nutrition programs.
Several programs also operate to the
benefit of indigenous groups. For
indigenous children, Ecuador’s National
Office of Intercultural Bilingual
Education, funded by the Ministry of
Education and Culture, oversees close to
2,000 basic bilingual education
institutions. Ecuador’s Fund for the
Development of Indigenous Groups, an
autonomous entity attached to the
Executive Branch, coordinates its
actions with the Council for the
Development of the Indigenous
Nationalities of Ecuador (CODENPE).
The role of the fund is to support
projects that promote the development
and technical capacity of indigenous
communities.
2. Statement of Work
Taking into account the challenges of
educating working children in Ecuador,
the applicant must implement creative,
innovative and targeted approaches to
promote policies and services that will
enhance the provision of educational
opportunities for indigenous children
involved in or at risk of entering
exploitive child labor. In consultations
with USDOL, the Government of
Ecuador has expressed its continued
support to USDOL-funded child labor
projects. Projects funded under this
cooperative agreement solicitation must
VerDate jul<14>2003
18:11 Jun 24, 2005
Jkt 205001
focus on direct education service(s)
delivery to targeted children, including
the provision of educational services
that address the specific gaps/challenges
that prevent working or at-risk
indigenous children from attending or
staying in school. Needs expressed by
Ecuadorian organizations working with
indigenous children are the lack of
resources for bilingual education, poor
infrastructure in rural schools, and
shortage of teachers.
USDOL defines educational services
and/or training opportunities as follows:
(1) Non-formal or basic literacy
education, as demonstrated by
enrollment in educational classes
provided by the program. These classes
may include transitional, leveling, or
literacy classes so that a child may
either be mainstreamed into formal
school and/or can participate in
vocational training activities; (2)
Vocational, pre-vocational, or skills
training, as demonstrated by enrollment
in training courses in order to develop
a particular skill (e.g., mechanics,
sewing, etc); (3) Mainstreaming/
Transitioning into the formal education
system, non-formal education,
vocational, pre-vocational, or skills
training after having received assistance
from the project to enable them to enroll
in such programs. The assistance
provided by the project could include
one or more of the following services:
The provision of school meals,
uniforms, books, school supplies and
materials, tuition and transportation
vouchers, or other types of incentives
that enable the child to be enrolled in
an education program; and (4) Formal
school enrollment, by directly
supporting a child’s enrollment,
retention, and completion in the formal
school system. Similar to the assistance
provided under mainstreaming,
assistance provided by the project could
include one or more of the following
services: The provision of uniforms,
books, school supplies and materials,
tuition and transportation vouchers, or
other types of incentives that enable the
child to be enrolled and maintained in
the formal school system. Activities
such as awareness raising and social
mobilization campaigns, psychosocial
services for children, improvements in
curriculum, teacher training or
improvements to school infrastructure
are important for improving access to
and quality of basic education. While
grantees are encouraged to address the
needs of working children in a
comprehensive manner, these activities
will not be considered as direct services
for individual children. Rather direct
services are those that meet the basic
PO 00000
Frm 00036
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
36951
needs of individual children that are
direct beneficiaries of the project.
Through improved policies and direct
education service delivery, as
applicable, the expected outcomes/
results of the project are to: (1) Reduce
the number of indigenous children
engaging in or at risk of engaging in
exploitive child labor; (2) increase
educational opportunities and access
(enrollment) for children who are
engaging in or at risk of engaging in
and/or removed from exploitive child
labor, particularly its worst forms; (3)
encourage retention in and completion
of educational programs; and (4) expand
the successful transition of children
from non-formal education programs
into formal schools or vocational
programs.
The applicant must identify a target
number of urban and/or rural
indigenous children engaging in or at
risk of engaging in exploitive and/or
worst forms of child labor in Ecuador,
who would be the direct beneficiaries of
a Child Labor Education Initiative
project, and the geographic areas of
greatest need. Direct beneficiaries are
children who are withdrawn or
prevented from entering exploitive child
labor, particularly its worst forms, by
USDOL-funded projects. Children
withdrawn from exploitive work are
those children who were found working
and no longer work as a result of a
project intervention. This category also
includes those children who were
engaged in exploitive work and as a
result of a project’s intervention now
work shorter hours under safer
conditions. Children prevented from
entering work are those children who
are either siblings of (ex) working
children or those children that are
considered to be at high risk of engaging
in exploitive work. In order to be
considered withdrawn or prevented, the
child must benefit from educational or
training opportunities. This is measured
by enrollment into school or training
programs. The overall project objective
must be to remove these children from
exploitive or worst forms of child labor
and to provide them with educational
and other services to prevent them from
returning to exploitive and/or worst
forms of child labor.
In preparing the application, in order
to identify gaps, unmet needs, and
opportunities that could be addressed
through a USDOL Child Labor
Education Initiative project, applicants
must conduct a needs assessment to
make a preliminary identification of the
current working and educational status
of the children that the applicant
proposes as beneficiaries. It is expected
that the information gathered during
E:\FR\FM\27JNN1.SGM
27JNN1
36952
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 122 / Monday, June 27, 2005 / Notices
this assessment will be refined after
award. The assessment, with data
sources, must include information on
the incidence and nature of exploitive
child labor, particularly the worst forms,
among target children, hours of work,
age and sex distribution of the proposed
beneficiaries, educational performance
relative to other children, if available,
and any research or other data that
might indicate correlations between
educational performance and hours of
work. Applicants are also encouraged to
propose strategies for collecting further
data on exploitive child labor and
children’s participation in schooling in
the early stages of the project’s baseline
data collection.
When developing their proposed
strategy and writing the application,
applicants must consult and make
reference to relevant literature and
documents relating to child labor and
the education of target children in
Ecuador. Furthermore, the application
must demonstrate familiarity with
existing child labor, education and
social welfare policies, plans and
projects in Ecuador, particularly those
pertaining to indigenous populations,
which the applicant is using to inform
project design for target children.
Applicants will also be evaluated on
their knowledge of other donors’
programs as they pertain to the
education of target children in Ecuador.
The applicant must consider the design
of other USDOL-funded child labor
projects in Ecuador implemented by the
ILO–IPEC and Catholic Relief Services,
and not target the same beneficiaries. In
identifying unmet needs, gaps and
opportunities not being addressed by
existing programs and current efforts,
and in proposing their own strategy,
applicants must show how their
knowledge of the school calendar and
the requirements of basic, non-formal,
and vocational education systems will
be used to develop an approach that
successfully enrolls children in
educational programs most quickly and
without missing an academic year or
program cycle. The applicant must
identify the direct cost per child of
maintaining the child in the educational
program, and of withdrawing the child
from exploitive or worst forms of child
labor. These costs must be realistic, and
based on existing costs of similar
programs. Applicants must design and
implement a project monitoring system
that allows for the tracking of direct
beneficiaries’ work and school status. In
addition, as child labor projects tend to
be implemented in resource-poor
environments where government
education and labor inspection systems
may be limited, applicants are
VerDate jul<14>2003
18:11 Jun 24, 2005
Jkt 205001
encouraged to work with local
stakeholders to develop sustainable
child labor and education monitoring
systems, including community based
systems, that can complement
government efforts to monitor children’s
working and educational status beyond
the life of the project. The applicant
must also identify organizations in
Ecuador, including indigenous
organizations, which could potentially
implement or contribute to a future
project. Applicants are encouraged to
develop approaches that support youth
participation within efforts to eliminate
the worst forms of child labor.
The application must also take into
account cross-cutting themes that could
affect project results in Ecuador, and
meaningfully incorporate them into the
proposed strategy, either to increase
opportunities or reduce threats to
successful implementation. In Ecuador
these include:
(1) Indigenous culture. Applicants
should demonstrate profound
knowledge of Ecuadorian indigenous
culture and movements, and indigenous
values regarding education and child
labor. This knowledge should be
incorporated into the project design to
ensure ownership by indigenous groups.
The project should develop a strategy to
collaborate with and involve indigenous
opinion leaders, and indigenous and
non-indigenous business leaders
interested in corporate social
responsibility.
(2) Political and Legal Environment.
In their approach to project
interventions, applicants should take
into account the current legal and
political relationship between
indigenous groups and government
structures. Applicants should also factor
in the effect that personnel changes in
cooperating ministries might have, and
design strategies that minimize
disruptions when such events occur.
(3) Weak organizational capacity and
conflictive social relations. Evaluations
of USDOL projects in the Andean region
have noted incidents of weak local
organizational capacity and conflictive
social relations, including teachers’
strikes leading to absenteeism.
Applicants should indicate to what
extent these challenges might be
significant in the areas where the project
would be implemented, how they
would be addressed, and how
relationships between indigenous and
non-indigenous organizations would be
developed.
(4) Educational relevance and
language of instruction. The applicant
must develop a strategy that will
increase the perceived relevance of
education for indigenous children, their
PO 00000
Frm 00037
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
parents, and the communities where
they live. If language of instruction
makes a difference to parents and
children, the applicant must show how
bilingual education programs would be
used as part of the project design.
(5) Other possible activities or
services. Applicants should address and
incorporate activities or services that
would address the multiple barriers that
could prevent the withdrawal of
Ecuadorian indigenous children from
exploitive work, and their participation
in education programs. Applicants
should also identify and address
additional social, cultural, or other
factors that should be taken into account
in designing a project for indigenous
working children or children at risk of
working in Ecuador.
Note to Applicants: All applicants
must have country presence, or partner
with an established and eligible
organization in Ecuador. In the course of
implementation, the project must
promote the goals of USDOL’s Child
Labor Education Initiative listed above
in Section I(1)(A). In addition, a project
funded under this solicitation must
provide educational and training
opportunities to children as a means to
remove and/or prevent them from
engaging in exploitive work. Because of
the limited resources available under
this award, applicants are expected to
implement programs that complement
existing efforts and, where appropriate,
replicate or enhance successful models
to serve a greater number of children
and communities. However, applicants
must not duplicate the activities of
existing efforts and/or projects and are
expected to work within host
government child labor and education
frameworks. To avoid duplication,
enhance collaboration, expand impact,
and develop synergies, the cooperative
agreement awardee (hereafter referred to
as ‘‘Grantee’’) must work cooperatively
with national stakeholders in
developing project interventions.
Applicants are expected to consider the
economic and social contexts of
Ecuador when formulating project
strategies.
USDOL will notify host government
ministry officials of the proposed
project. During the preparation of an
application for this cooperative
agreement solicitation, applicants may
discuss proposed interventions,
strategies, and activities with host
government officials and civil society
organizations.
Partnerships between more than one
organization are also eligible and are
encouraged, particularly, given the
target group of indigenous children,
partnerships with indigenous, country-
E:\FR\FM\27JNN1.SGM
27JNN1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 122 / Monday, June 27, 2005 / Notices
based organizations in order to build
those organizations’ capacity. If a
partnership is proposed, a lead
organization must be identified, and
relationships with partner organizations
receiving funds must be codified in an
appropriate joint venture, partnership,
or other contractual agreement.
Partnerships with non-indigenous
organizations already working to
provide services to indigenous children
are also acceptable. Copies of such
agreements should be submitted as an
attachment to the application, and will
not count toward the page limit.
Applicants are strongly encouraged to
enroll at least one-quarter of the
children targeted by the proposed
program in educational activities during
the first year of project implementation.
Under this cooperative agreement
solicitation, vocational training for
adolescents and income generating
alternatives for parents are allowable
activities. Please note: USDOL reserves
the right to approve or disapprove
alternative income-generating activities
after award of the cooperative
agreement. Permissible costs related to
alternative income-generating activities
for target families may include, but are
not limited to, skills training, tools,
equipment, guides, manuals, and market
feasibility studies. However, as stated in
Section IV(5)(B)(i), Grantees and subcontractors may not provide direct cash
transfers to communities, parents, or
children.
Although USDOL is open to all
proposals for innovative solutions to
address the challenges of providing
increased access to education for the
children targeted, the applicant must, at
a minimum, follow the outline of a
preliminary project design document
presented in Appendix A, and, within
that format, address all criteria, factors,
and required descriptions identified in
Sections IV(2), V(1)(A), VI(3)(A) and
VI(3)(D). This response will be the
foundation for the final project
document that must be approved within
six months after award of the
cooperative agreement.
If the application does not propose
interventions aimed toward the target
group or geographical area as identified,
then the application will be considered
unresponsive and will be rejected.
Note to All Applicants: Grantees are
expected to consult with and work
cooperatively with stakeholders in the
country, including the Ministries of
Education, Labor, and other relevant
ministries, non-governmental
organizations (NGOs), national steering/
advisory committees on child labor,
education, faith and community-based
organizations, and working children and
VerDate jul<14>2003
18:11 Jun 24, 2005
Jkt 205001
their families. Grantees should ensure
that their proposed activities and
interventions are consistent with those
of Ecuador’s national child labor and
education frameworks and priorities, as
applicable. Grantees are strongly
encouraged to collaborate with existing
projects, particularly those funded by
USDOL, including Timebound Programs
and other projects implemented by the
ILO/IPEC. As discussed in Section
V(1)(D), up to five (5) extra points will
be given to applications that include
committed non-Federal resources that
significantly expand the project’s scope.
However, applicants are instructed that
the project budget submitted with the
application must include all necessary
and sufficient funds, without reliance
on other contracts, grants, or awards, to
implement the applicant’s proposed
project activities and to achieve
proposed project goals and objectives
under this solicitation. If anticipated
funding from another contract, grant, or
award fails to materialize, USDOL will
not provide additional funding to cover
these costs.
II. Award Information
Type of assistance instrument:
cooperative agreement. USDOL’s
involvement in project implementation
and oversight is outlined in Section
VI(2). The duration of the project(s)
funded by this solicitation is up to four
(4) years. The start date of program
activities will be negotiated upon
awarding of the cooperative agreement,
but will be no later than September 30,
2005.
Up to U.S. $4 million will be awarded
under this solicitation. USDOL may
award one or more cooperative
agreements to one, several, or a
partnership of more than one
organization(s) that may apply to
implement the program. A Grantee must
obtain prior USDOL approval for any
sub-contractor proposed in the
application before award of the
cooperative agreement. The Grantee
may not sub-grant any of the funds
obligated under this cooperative
agreement. See Section VI(2)(B) for
further information on sub-contracts.
III. Eligibility Information
1. Eligible Applicants
Any commercial, international,
educational, or non-profit organization,
including any faith-based, communitybased, or public international
organization capable of successfully
developing and implementing education
programs for working children or
children at risk of entering exploitive
work in Ecuador is eligible to apply.
PO 00000
Frm 00038
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
36953
Partnerships of more than one
organization are also eligible, and
applicants are strongly encouraged to
work with organizations already
undertaking projects in Ecuador,
particularly local NGOs, including faithbased and community-based
organizations, and non-governmental
indigenous organizations. In the case of
partnership applications, a lead
organization must be identified, and the
relationship with any partner
organizations receiving funds must be
set forth in an appropriate joint venture,
partnership, or other contractual
agreement. An applicant must
demonstrate a country presence,
independently or through a relationship
with another organization(s) with
country presence, which gives it the
ability to initiate program activities
upon award of the cooperative
agreement. See Section V(1)(B)(ii).
Please Note: Applications from foreign
government and quasi-government
agencies will not be considered.
Applicants applying for more than
one cooperative agreement must submit
a separate application for each country.
If applications for more than one of the
cooperative agreements are combined,
they will not be considered. (All
applicants are requested to complete the
Survey on Ensuring Equal Opportunity
for Applicants (OMB No. 1225–0083),
which is available online at https://
www.dol.gov/ilab/grants/bkgrd.htm).
The capability of an applicant or
applicants to perform necessary aspects
of this solicitation will be determined
under the criteria outlined in the
Application Review Information section
of this solicitation (Section V(1)).
Please note that to be eligible,
cooperative agreement applicants
classified under the Internal Revenue
Code as a 501(c)(4) entity (see 26 U.S.C.
501(c)(4)), may not engage in lobbying
activities. According to the Lobbying
Disclosure Act of 1995, as codified at 2
U.S.C. 1611, an organization, as
described in section 501(c)(4) of the
Internal Revenue Code of 1986, that
engages in lobbying activities directed
toward the U.S. Government will not be
eligible for the receipt of Federal funds
constituting an award, grant,
cooperative agreement, or loan.
2. Cost Sharing or Matching Funds
This solicitation does not require
applicants to share costs or provide
matching funds. However, the
leveraging of resources and in-kind
contributions is strongly encouraged
and is a rating factor worth up to five
(5) additional points.
E:\FR\FM\27JNN1.SGM
27JNN1
36954
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 122 / Monday, June 27, 2005 / Notices
3. Other Eligibility Criteria
In accordance with 29 CFR part 98,
entities that are debarred or suspended
from receiving federal contracts or
grants shall be excluded from Federal
financial assistance and are ineligible to
receive funding under this solicitation.
In judging organizational capacity,
USDOL will take into account not only
information provided by an applicant,
but also information from USDOL, other
Federal agencies, and other
organizations regarding past
performance of organizations that have
implemented or are implementing Child
Labor Education Initiative projects, or
other projects or activities for USDOL
and other Federal agencies (see Section
V(1)(B)). Past performance will be rated
by such factors as the timeliness of
deliverables, and the responsiveness of
the organization and its staff to USDOL
or grantor communications regarding
deliverables and cooperative agreement
or contractual requirements. In addition,
USDOL will consider the performance
of the organization’s key personnel on
existing projects with USDOL or other
entities, the frequency of the
organization’s replacement of key
personnel, and the quality and
timeliness of such key personnel
replacements. Lack of past experience
with USDOL projects, cooperative
agreements, grants, or contracts is not a
bar to eligibility or selection under this
solicitation.
Faith-based organizations may apply
for Federal funds under this solicitation.
Neutral, non-religious criteria that
neither favor nor disfavor religion will
be employed in the selection of
cooperative agreement recipients.
Similarly, neutral, non-religious criteria
that neither favor nor disfavor religion
must be employed by Grantees in the
selection of project beneficiaries and
sub-contractors.
In addition, per the provisions
outlined in Section 2 of Executive Order
13279 and 29 CFR 2.33(b), the U.S.
Government is generally prohibited
from providing direct financial
assistance for inherently religious
activities. Funds awarded under this
solicitation may not be used for
religious instruction, worship, prayer,
proselytizing or other inherently
religious activities.
IV. Application and Submission
Information
1. Address to Request Application
Package
This solicitation contains all of the
necessary information and forms needed
to apply for cooperative agreement
funding. This solicitation is published
VerDate jul<14>2003
18:11 Jun 24, 2005
Jkt 205001
as part of this Federal Register notice.
Additional copies of the Federal
Register may be obtained from your
nearest U.S. Government office or
public library or online at https://
www.archives.gov/federal_register/
index.html.
2. Content and Form of Application
Submission
Applicants must submit one (1) blue
ink-signed original, complete
application in English, plus two (2)
copies of the application. Applicants
may submit applications for one or more
countries. In the case where an
applicant is interested in applying for a
cooperative agreement in more than one
country, a separate application must be
submitted for each country. If
applications for multiple countries are
combined, the application will be
considered unresponsive and will be
rejected.
The application must consist of two
(2) separate parts, as well as a table of
contents and an abstract summarizing
the application in not more than two (2)
pages. The table of contents and the
abstract are not included in the 45-page
limit for Part II. Applicants should
number all pages of the application.
Part I of the application, the cost
proposal, must contain the Standard
Form (SF) 424, Application for Federal
Assistance and Sections A–F of the
Budget Information Form SF 424A,
available from ILAB’s Web site at
https://www.dol.gov/ilab/grants/
bkgrd.htm. Copies of these forms are
also available online from the General
Services Administration Web site at
https://contacts.gsa.gov/webforms.nsf/0/
B835648D66D1B8F985256A72004
C58C2/$file/sf424.pdf and https://
contacts.gsa.gov/webforms.nsf/0/
5AEB1FA6FB3B8323
85256A72004C8E77/$file/Sf424a.pdf.
The individual signing the SF 424 on
behalf of the applicant must be
authorized to bind the applicant. The
budget/cost proposal and any other
accompanying charts or graphs must be
written in 10–12 pitch font size.
Part II, the technical proposal, must
provide a technical application that
identifies and explains the proposed
program and demonstrates the
applicant’s capabilities to carry out that
proposal. The technical application
must identify how the applicant will
carry out the Statement of Work
(Section I(2) of this solicitation) and
address each of the Application
Evaluation Criteria found in Section
V(1).
The Part II technical application must
not exceed 45 single-sided (81⁄2″ x 11″),
double-spaced, 10 to 12 pitch typed
PO 00000
Frm 00039
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
pages, and must include responses to
the application evaluation criteria
outlined in Section V(1) of this
solicitation. Part II must include a
preliminary project design document
submitted in the format shown in
Appendix A and discussed further in
Section VI(3)(A). The application must
include the name, address, telephone
and fax numbers, and e-mail address (if
applicable) of a key contact person at
the applicant’s organization in case
questions should arise.
Applications will only be accepted in
English. To be considered responsive to
this solicitation, the application must
consist of the above-mentioned separate
parts. Any applications that do not
conform to these standards may be
deemed unresponsive to this solicitation
and may be rejected. Standard forms
and attachments are not included in the
45-page limit for Part II. However, any
additional information not required
under this solicitation will not be
considered.
3. Submission Dates, Times, and
Address
Applications must be delivered (by
hand or mail) by 4:45 p.m., Eastern
Time, August 11, 2005 to: U.S.
Department of Labor, Procurement
Services Center, 200 Constitution
Avenue, NW., Room N–5416,
Washington, D.C. 20210, Attention: Lisa
Harvey, Reference: Solicitation 05–06.
Applications sent by e-mail, telegram, or
facsimile (FAX) will not be accepted.
Applications sent by non-Postal Service
delivery services, such as Federal
Express or UPS, will be accepted;
however, the applicant bears the
responsibility for timely submission.
The application package must be
received at the designated place by the
date and time specified or it will be
considered unresponsive and will be
rejected. Any application received at the
Procurement Services Center after the
deadline will not be considered unless
it is received before the award is made
and:
A. It is determined by the Government
that the late receipt was due solely to
mishandling by the Government after
receipt at USDOL at the address
indicated; and/or
B. It was sent by registered or certified
mail not later than the fifth calendar day
before the deadline; or
C. It was sent by U.S. Postal Service
Express Mail Next Day Service-Post
Office to Addressee, not later than 5
p.m. at the place of mailing two (2)
working days, excluding weekends and
Federal holidays, prior to the deadline.
The only acceptable evidence to
establish the date of mailing of a late
E:\FR\FM\27JNN1.SGM
27JNN1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 122 / Monday, June 27, 2005 / Notices
application sent by registered or
certified mail is the U.S. Postal Service
postmark on the envelope or wrapper
and on the original receipt from the U.S.
Postal Service. If the postmark is not
legible, an application received after the
above closing time and date shall be
processed as if mailed late. ‘‘Postmark’’
means a printed, stamped, or otherwise
placed impression (not a postage meter
machine impression) that is readily
identifiable without further action as
having been applied and affixed by an
employee of the U.S. Postal Service on
the date of mailing. Therefore,
applicants should request that the postal
clerk place a legible hand cancellation
‘‘bull’s-eye’’ postmark on both the
receipt and the envelope or wrapper.
The only acceptable evidence to
establish the date of mailing of a late
application sent by U.S. Postal Service
Express Mail Next Day Service-Post
Office to Addressee is the date entered
by the Post Office clerk on the ‘‘Express
Mail Next Day Service-Post Office to
Addressee’’ label and the postmark on
the envelope or wrapper on the original
receipt from the U.S. Postal Service.
‘‘Postmark’’ has the same meaning as
defined above. Therefore, applicants
should request that the postal clerk
place a legible hand cancellation
‘‘bull’s-eye’’ postmark on both the
receipt and the envelope or wrapper.
The only acceptable evidence to
establish the time of receipt at USDOL
is the Procurement Service Center’s
date/time stamp on the application
wrapper or other documentary evidence
of receipt maintained by that office.
Confirmation of receipt can be
obtained from Lisa Harvey, U.S.
Department of Labor, Procurement
Services Center, telephone (202) 693–
4570 (this is not a toll-free-number) or
e-mail: harvey.lisa@dol.gov. All
applicants are advised that U.S. mail
delivery in the Washington, DC area can
be slow and erratic due to concerns
involving contamination. All applicants
must take this into consideration when
preparing to meet the application
deadline.
4. Intergovernmental Review
This funding opportunity is not
subject to Executive Order 12372,
‘‘Intergovernmental Review of Federal
Programs.’’
5. Funding Restrictions
A. In addition to those specified
under OMB Circular A–122, the
following costs are also unallowable:
i. Construction with funds under this
cooperative agreement is subject to
USDOL approval and ordinarily should
not exceed 10 percent of the project
VerDate jul<14>2003
18:11 Jun 24, 2005
Jkt 205001
budget’s direct costs and is expected to
be limited to improving existing school
infrastructure and facilities in the
project’s targeted communities. USDOL
encourages applicants to cost-share and/
or leverage funds or in-kind
contributions from local partners when
proposing construction activities in
order to ensure sustainability.
ii. Under these cooperative
agreements, vocational training for
adolescents and income-generating
alternatives for parents are allowable
activities. However, Federal funds
under these cooperative agreements
cannot be used to provide micro-credits,
revolving funds, or loan guarantees.
Please note: USDOL reserves the right to
negotiate the exact nature, form, or
scope of alternative income-generating
activities after award of the cooperative
agreement. Permissible costs related to
alternative income-generating activities
may include, but are not limited to,
skills training, tools, equipment, guides,
manuals, and market feasibility studies.
iii. Awards will not allow
reimbursement of pre-award costs.
B. The following activities are also
unallowable under this solicitation:
i. The Grantee may not sub-grant any
of the funds obligated under this
cooperative agreement. Sub-granting
may not appear or be included in the
budget as a line item. In addition,
Grantees may not provide direct cash
transfers to communities, parents, or
children. The funding for this program
does not include authority for subgrants and, as a matter of policy, USDOL
does not allow for direct cash transfers
to target beneficiaries. USDOL, however,
would support the purchase of
incidental items in the nature of
‘‘participant support costs’’ under OMB
Circular A–122, Attachment B, No. 34,
which are necessary to ensure that target
children have access to schooling. These
participant support costs may include
such items as uniforms and school
supplies, and the provision of tuition
and transportation costs in the form of
vouchers to the provider of services. If
an applicant proposes the provision of
participant support costs, the applicant
must specify: (1) Why these activities
and interventions are necessary, and
how they will contribute to the overall
project goals; and (2) how will the
disbursement of funds be administered
in order to maximize efficiency and
minimize the risk of misuse. The
applicant must also address how
participant support costs being funded
by the project will be made sustainable
once the project is completed.
If proposed participant support costs
are approved by USDOL, these items
must be purchased or paid for directly
PO 00000
Frm 00040
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
36955
by the Grantee or its sub-contractor(s),
as opposed to handing cash directly to
children or other individuals.
ii. Under these cooperative
agreements, awareness raising and
advocacy activities cannot include fundraising or lobbying of the U. S. Federal,
State or Local Governments (see OMB
Circular A–122).
iii. In accordance with OMB Circular
A–122, funds awarded under this
cooperative agreement may be used to
cover the costs of meetings and
conferences, as long as the primary
purpose of such an event is the
dissemination of technical information.
These costs include meals,
transportation, rental of facilities,
speakers’ fees, and other items
incidental to such meetings or
conference.
iv. USDOL funds awarded under this
solicitation are not intended to
duplicate or substitute for host country
government efforts or resources
intended for child labor or education
programs. Thus, Grantees may not
provide any of the funds awarded under
this cooperative agreement to foreign
government entities, ministries,
officials, or political parties. However,
sub-contracts with foreign government
agencies may be awarded to provide
direct services or undertake project
activities subject to applicable laws and
only after a competitive procurement
process has been conducted and no
other entity in the country is able to
provide these services. The Grantee
must receive prior USDOL approval
before sub-contracting the provision of
direct services to foreign government
agencies.
v. Applicants are reminded that U.S.
Executive Orders and U.S. law prohibit
transactions with, and the provision of
resources and support to, individuals
and organizations associated with
terrorism. It is the legal responsibility of
the Grantee to ensure compliance with
these Executive Orders and laws. This
provision must be included in all subcontracts issued under the cooperative
agreement.
vi. The U.S. Government is opposed
to prostitution and related activities,
which are inherently harmful and
dehumanizing, and contribute to the
phenomenon of trafficking in persons.
U.S. non-governmental organizations,
and their sub-contractors, cannot use
U.S. Government funds to lobby for,
promote or advocate the legalization or
regulation of prostitution as a legitimate
form of work. Foreign non-governmental
organizations, and their sub-contractors,
that receive U.S. Government funds to
fight trafficking in persons cannot lobby
for, promote or advocate the legalization
E:\FR\FM\27JNN1.SGM
27JNN1
36956
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 122 / Monday, June 27, 2005 / Notices
or regulation of prostitution as a
legitimate form of work. It is the
responsibility of the Grantee to ensure
its sub-contractors meet these criteria.
(The U.S. Government is currently
developing language to specifically
address Public International
Organizations’ implementation of the
above anti-prostitution prohibition. If a
project under this solicitation is
awarded to such an organization,
appropriate substitute language for the
above prohibition will be included in
the project’s cooperative agreement.)
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lisa
Harvey. E-mail address:
harvey.lisa@dol.gov. For a list of
frequently asked questions on USDOL’s
Child Labor Education Initiative
Solicitation for Cooperative Agreement,
please visit https://www.dol.gov/ILAB/
faq/faq36.htm.
V. Application Review Information
1. Application Evaluation Criteria
Technical panels will review
applications written in the specified
format (see Section I, Section IV(2) and
Appendix A) against the various criteria
on the basis of 100 points. Up to five
additional points will be given for the
inclusion of non-Federal leveraged
resources as described below in Section
V(1)(D). Applicants are requested to
prepare their technical proposal (45
page maximum) organized in
accordance with Appendix A, and
address all of the following rating
factors, which are presented in the order
of emphasis that they will receive, and
the maximum rating points for each
factor.
Program Design/Budget-Cost
Effectiveness: 45 points.
Organizational Capacity: 30 points.
Management Plan/Key Personnel/
Staffing: 25 points.
Leveraging Resources: 5 extra points.
A. Project/Program Design/Budget-Cost
Effectiveness (45 points)
This part of the application
constitutes the preliminary project
design document described in Section
VI(3)(A), and outlined in Appendix A.
The applicant’s proposal must describe
in detail the proposed approach to
comply with each requirement.
Applicants will be rated based on their
understanding of the child labor and
education context in the host country,
as well as on the clarity and quality of
information provided in the project
design document.
This component of the application
must demonstrate the applicant’s
thorough knowledge and understanding
of the issues, barriers, and challenges
VerDate jul<14>2003
18:11 Jun 24, 2005
Jkt 205001
involved in providing education to
children engaging in or at risk of
engaging in exploitive child labor,
particularly its worst forms; bestpractice solutions to address their
needs; and the policy and implementing
environment in the selected country.
When preparing the technical proposal,
the applicant must follow the outline
provided in Appendix A, and at
minimum include a description of:
i. Children Targeted—The applicant
must identify which and how many
children are expected to receive direct
and indirect services from the project,
including the sectors in which they
work, geographical location, and other
relevant characteristics. Please refer to
Section I(2) for USDOL’s definition of
educational services and training
opportunities for children targeted
under this solicitation.
Children are defined as persons under
the age of 18 who have been engaged or
at risk of engaging in the worst forms of
child labor as defined by ILO
Convention 182, or those under the legal
working age of the country and who are
engaged or at risk of engaging in other
hazardous and/or exploitive activities.
Under this solicitation, at-risk children
are defined as siblings of working
children, or children living in areas
with a high incidence of exploitive
child labor.
ii. Needs/Gaps/Barriers—The
applicant must describe the specific
gaps/educational needs of the children
targeted that the project will address.
Note: The number of children targeted by
the project must be commensurate with the
need in the geographical area or sector where
the project will be implemented. In addition,
the budget proposed should take into account
the type of work in which the target children
are currently engaged, and the cost of
removing the child from that sector.
iii. Proposed Strategy—The applicant
must discuss the proposed strategy to
address gaps/needs/barriers of the
children targeted and its rationale.
Applicants will be rated based on the
quality and pertinence of proposed
strategies. Please refer to Section I(2) for
USDOL’s definition of educational
services and training opportunities for
children targeted under this solicitation.
iv. Sustainability Plan—The applicant
must discuss a proposed plan for
sustainability of project efforts. To
USDOL, sustainability is linked to
project impact and the ability of
individuals, communities, and a nation
to ensure that the activities or changes
implemented by a project endure. A
project’s impact is manifested at the
level of individuals, organizations, and
systems. For individual children and
their families this would mean a
PO 00000
Frm 00041
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
positive and enduring change in their
life conditions as a result of project
interventions. At the level of
organizations and systems, sustained
impact would involve continued
commitment and ability (including
financial commitment and policy
change) by project partners to continue
the actions generated by the project,
including enforcement of existing
policies that target child labor and
school attendance. Applicants will be
rated based on the pertinence and
appropriateness of the proposed
sustainability plan.
v. Description of Activities—The
applicant must provide a detailed
description of proposed activities that
relate to the gaps/needs/barriers to be
addressed, including training and
technical assistance to be provided to
project staff, host country nationals and
community groups involved in the
project. The proposed approach is
expected to build upon existing
activities, government policies, and
plans, and avoid needless duplication.
Please refer to Section I(2) for USDOL’s
definition of educational services and
training opportunities for children
targeted under this solicitation.
vi. Work Plan—The applicant must
provide a detailed work plan and
timeline for the proposed project,
preferably with a visual such as a Gantt
chart. Applicants will be rated based on
the clarity and quality of the
information provided in the work plan.
Note: Applicants are also encouraged to
enroll one-quarter of the targeted children in
educational activities during the first year of
project implementation.
vii. Program Management and
Performance Assessment—The
applicant must describe: (1) How
management will ensure that the goals
and objectives will be met; (2) how
information and data will be collected
and used to demonstrate the impacts of
the project; and (3) what systems will be
put in place for self-assessment,
evaluation, and continuous
improvement. Note to All Applicants:
USDOL has already developed common
indicators (enrollment, retention, and
completion) and a database system for
monitoring children’s educational
progress that can be used and adapted
by Grantees after award. Grantees will
be responsible for entering information
on each project beneficiary into this
database system. Further guidance on
common indicators will be provided
after award, thus applicants should
focus their program management and
performance assessment responses
toward the development of their
project’s monitoring strategy in support
E:\FR\FM\27JNN1.SGM
27JNN1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 122 / Monday, June 27, 2005 / Notices
of the delivery of direct education and
training opportunities to working
children and those at risk of engaging in
exploitive work, and the four goals of
the Child Labor Education Initiative set
out in Section I(1)(A). Because of the
potentially significant links between
hours worked, working conditions, and
school performance, Grantees are
encouraged to collect information to
track this correlation among project
beneficiaries. Applicants proposing
innovative methodologies in this area
will be rated more highly.
Please note: In addition to reporting
on the common indicators, applicants
will be expected to track the working
status, conditions, and hours of targeted
children, including the withdrawal of
children from exploitive/hazardous
working conditions. Applicants are also
expected to explore cost-effective ways
of assessing the impact of proposed
services/interventions to indirect
beneficiaries.
Applicants are expected to budget for
costs associated with collecting and
reporting on the common indicators
(enrollment, retention, and completion),
data management, tracking the working
status children, and assessing the
impact of services/interventions to
indirect beneficiaries.
viii. Budget/Cost Effectiveness—The
applicant must show how the budget
reflects program goals and design in a
cost-effective way to reflect budget/
performance integration. The budget
must be linked to the activities and
outputs of the implementation plan
listed above. The budget proposed
should also take into account the type
of work in which the target children are
currently engaged.
This section of the application must
explain the costs for performing all of
the requirements presented in this
solicitation, and for producing all
required reports and other deliverables.
Costs must include labor; equipment;
travel; annual single audits or
attestation engagements (as applicable);
midterm and final evaluations; and
other related costs. Applications are
expected to allocate sufficient resources
to proposed studies, assessments,
surveys, and monitoring and evaluation
activities, including costs associated
with collecting information for and
reporting on the common indicators. In
addition, the budget should include a
contingency provision, calculated at 5%
of the project’s total direct costs, for
unexpected expenses essential to
meeting project goals, such as host
country currency devaluations, security
costs, etc. USDOL will not provide
additional funding to cover
unanticipated costs. Grantees must
VerDate jul<14>2003
18:11 Jun 24, 2005
Jkt 205001
obtain prior approval from USDOL
before using contingency funds. If these
funds have not been exhausted toward
the end of the project period, USDOL
and the Grantee will determine whether
it is appropriate to reallocate the funds
to direct educational or training services
or return the funds to USDOL.
Grantees should also budget for a
facilitator-led project launch meeting in
the target country, which will allow key
stakeholders to discuss issues of project
design and monitoring.
When developing their applications,
applicants are also expected to allocate
the largest proportion of resources to
educational activities aimed at targeted
children, rather than direct and/or
indirect administrative costs. Higher
ratings will be given to applicants with
low administrative costs and with a
budget breakdown that provides a larger
amount of resources to project activities.
All projected costs should be reported,
as they will become part of the
cooperative agreement upon award. In
their cost proposal (Part I of the
application), applicants must reflect a
breakdown of the total administrative
costs into direct administrative costs
and indirect administrative costs. This
section will be evaluated in accordance
with applicable Federal laws and
regulations. The budget must comply
with Federal cost principles (which can
be found in the applicable OMB
Circulars). An example of an Output
Based Budget has been provided as
Annex B.
Applicants are encouraged to discuss
the possibility of exemption from
customs and Value Added Tax (VAT)
with host government officials during
the preparation of an application for this
cooperative agreement. While USDOL
encourages host governments to not
apply custom or VAT taxes to USDOLfunded programs, some host
governments may nevertheless choose
to assess such taxes. USDOL may not be
able to provide assistance in this regard.
Applicants should take into account
such costs in budget preparation. If
major costs are omitted, a Grantee may
not be allowed to include them later.
B. Organizational Capacity (30 points)
Under this criterion, the applicant
must present the qualifications of the
organization(s) implementing the
program/project. The evaluation criteria
in this category are as follows:
i. International Experience—The
organization applying for the award has
international experience implementing
basic, transitional, non-formal, or
vocational education programs that
address issues of access, quality, and
policy reform for vulnerable children
PO 00000
Frm 00042
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
36957
including children engaging in or at risk
of engaging in exploitive child labor,
preferably in the country of interest.
ii. Country Presence—Given the need
to provide children engaged in the worst
forms of child labor with immediate
assistance in accessing educational and
training opportunities, applicants will
be evaluated on their ability to start up
project activities soon after signing a
cooperative agreement. Having country
presence, or partnering with in-country
organizations, presents the best chance
of expediting the delivery of services to
children engaging in or at risk of
engaging in the worst forms of child
labor. In their application, applicants
must address country presence;
outreach to government and nongovernmental organizations, including
local and community-based
organizations; and the ability of the
organization to start up project activities
in a timely fashion. Applicants may
submit supporting documentation with
their application demonstrating country
presence and/or outreach to host
government ministries and nongovernmental organizations in the
country. These attachments will not
count toward the page limit.
Within 60 days of award, an
applicant, or its partners, must be
formally recognized by the host
government(s) using the appropriate
mechanism, e.g., Memorandum of
Understanding or local registration of
the organization. An applicant must
demonstrate, independently or through
a relationship with another
organization(s), the ability to initiate
program activities upon award of the
cooperative agreement, as well as the
capability to work directly with
government ministries, educators, civil
society leaders, and other local faithbased or community organizations.
iii. Fiscal Oversight—The
organization shows evidence of a sound
financial system.
If the applicant is a U.S.-based, nonprofit organization already subject to the
single audit requirements, the
applicant’s most recent single audit, as
submitted to the Federal Audit
Clearinghouse, must accompany the
application as an attachment. In
addition, applications must show that
they have complied with report
submission timeframes established in
OMB Circular A–133. If an applicant is
not in compliance with the
requirements for completing their single
audit, the application will be considered
unresponsive and will be rejected.
If the applicant is a for-profit or
foreign-based organization, a copy of its
most current independent financial
E:\FR\FM\27JNN1.SGM
27JNN1
36958
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 122 / Monday, June 27, 2005 / Notices
audit must accompany the application
as an attachment.
Applicants should also submit a copy
of the most recent single audit report for
all proposed U.S.-based, non-profit
partners, and sub-contractors that are
subject to the Single Audit Act. If the
proposed partner(s) is a for-profit or
foreign-based organization, a copy of its
most current independent financial
audit should accompany the application
as an attachment. Applicants may wish
to review the audits of prospective
organizations before deciding whether
they want to partner with or subcontract to them under an Education
Initiative cooperative agreement.
Note to all applicants: In order to
expedite the Procurement screening of
applications, and to ensure that the
appropriate audits are attached to the
proposals, the applicant must provide a
cover sheet to the audit attachments
listing all proposed partners and subcontractors. These attachments will not
count toward the application page limit.
USDOL reserves the right to ask
further questions on any audit report
submitted as part of an application.
USDOL also reserves the right to place
special conditions on Grantees if
concerns are raised in their audit
reports.
Note to all applicants: If a copy of the
most recent audit report is not
submitted as part of the application, the
application will be considered
unresponsive and will be rejected. In
addition, if the audit submitted by the
applicant reflects any adverse opinions,
the application will not be further
considered by the technical review
panel and will be rejected.
iv. Coordination—If two or more
organizations are applying for the award
in the form of a partnership or joint
venture, they must demonstrate an
approach to ensure the successful
collaboration including clear
delineation of respective roles and
responsibilities. Although each partner
will bear independent legal liability for
the entire project, the applicants must
identify a lead organization and must
submit the joint venture, partnership, or
other contractual agreement as an
attachment (which will not count
toward the page limit). If a partnership
between two or more organizations is
proposed, applicants are encouraged to
outline the deliverables, activities, and
corresponding timeline for which each
organization will be responsible for
completing.
v. Experience—The application must
include information on previous and
current grants, cooperative agreements,
or contracts of the applicant with
USDOL and other Federal agencies that
VerDate jul<14>2003
18:11 Jun 24, 2005
Jkt 205001
are relevant to this solicitation,
including:
(a) The organizations for which the
work was done;
(b) A contact person in that
organization with his/her current phone
number;
(c) The dollar value of the grant,
contract, or cooperative agreement for
the project;
(d) The time frame and professional
effort involved in the project;
(e) A brief summary of the work
performed; and
(f) A brief summary of
accomplishments.
This information on previous grants,
cooperative agreements, and contracts
held by the applicant must be provided
in appendices and will not count
against the maximum page requirement.
USDOL reserves the right to contact the
organizations listed and use the
information provided in evaluating
applications.
Note to All Applicants: In judging
organizational capacity, USDOL will
take into account not only information
provided by an applicant, but also
information from the Department and
others regarding past performance of
organizations already implementing
Child Labor Education Initiative
projects or activities for USDOL and
others. Past performance will be rated
by such factors as the timeliness of
deliverables, and the responsiveness of
the organization and its staff to USDOL
or grantor communications regarding
deliverables and cooperative agreement
or contractual requirements. In addition,
the performance of the organization’s
key personnel on existing projects with
USDOL or other entities, whether the
organization has a history of replacing
key personnel with similarly qualified
staff, and the timeliness of replacing key
personnel, will also be taken into
consideration when rating past
performance. Lack of past experience
with USDOL projects, cooperative
agreements, grants, or contracts is not a
bar to eligibility or selection under this
solicitation.
C. Management Plan/Key Personnel/
Staffing (25 points)
Successful performance of the
proposed work depends heavily on the
management skills and qualifications of
the individuals committed to the
project. Accordingly, in its evaluation of
each application, USDOL will place
emphasis on the applicant’s
management approach and commitment
of personnel qualified for the work
involved in accomplishing the assigned
tasks. This section of the application
must include sufficient information to
PO 00000
Frm 00043
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
judge management and staffing plans,
and the experience and competence of
program staff proposed for the project to
assure that they meet the required
qualifications.
Note that management and
professional technical staff members
comprising the applicant’s proposed
team should be individuals who have
prior experience with organizations
working in similar efforts, and who are
fully qualified to perform work
specified in the Statement of Work.
Where sub-contractors or outside
assistance are proposed, organizational
lines of authority and responsibility
should be clearly delineated to ensure
responsiveness to the needs of USDOL.
Note to All Applicants: All key
personnel must allocate 100 percent of
their time to the project and be present
within the target country. Key personnel
positions must not be combined.
Proposed key personnel candidates
must sign letters of agreement to serve
on the project, and indicate availability
to commence work within 30 days of
cooperative agreement award.
Applicants must submit these letters as
an attachment to the application. (These
will not count toward the page limit). If
key personnel letters of agreement to
serve on the project are not submitted as
part of the application, the application
will be considered unresponsive and
will be rejected.
i. Key personnel—The applicant must
identify all key personnel candidates
proposed to carry out the requirements
of this solicitation. ‘‘Key personnel’’ are
staff (Project Director, Education
Specialist, and Monitoring and
Evaluation Officer) who are essential to
the successful operation of the project
and completion of the proposed work
and, therefore, as detailed in Section
VI(2)(C), may not be replaced or have
hours reduced without the approval of
the Grant Officer. If key personnel
candidates are not designated, the
application will be considered
unresponsive and will be rejected. Note:
preference may be given to applicants
who propose qualified key personnel
who have extensive experience in the
host country.
(a) A Project Director who will be
responsible for overall project
management, supervision,
administration, and implementation of
the requirements of the cooperative
agreement. He/she will establish and
maintain systems for project operations;
ensure that all cooperative agreement
deadlines are met and targets are
achieved; maintain working
relationships with project stakeholders
and partners; and oversee the
preparation and submission of progress
E:\FR\FM\27JNN1.SGM
27JNN1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 122 / Monday, June 27, 2005 / Notices
and financial reports. The Project
Director must have a minimum of three
years of professional experience in a
leadership role in implementation of
complex basic education programs in
developing countries in areas such as:
education policy; improving
educational quality and access;
educational assessment of
disadvantaged students; development of
community participation in the
improvement of basic education for
disadvantaged children; and monitoring
and evaluation of basic education
projects. Consideration will be given to
candidates with additional years of
experience including experience
working with officials of ministries of
education and/or labor. Preferred
candidates must also have knowledge of
exploitive child labor issues, and
experience in the development of
transitional, formal, and vocational
education of children removed from
exploitive child labor and/or victims of
the worst forms of child labor. Fluency
in English is required and working
knowledge of the official language of the
target country, or at least one of the
official languages if there is more than
one, is preferred. Knowledge of relevant
indigenous languages used by project
beneficiaries is desirable.
(b) An Education Specialist who will
provide leadership in developing the
technical aspects of this project in
collaboration with the Project Director.
This person must have at least three
years experience in basic education
projects in developing countries in areas
including student assessment, teacher
training, educational materials
development, educational management,
and educational monitoring and
information systems. This person must
have experience in working successfully
with ministries of education, networks
of educators, employers’ organizations
and trade union representatives or
comparable entities. Additional
experience with exploitive child labor/
education policy and monitoring and
evaluation is an asset. A working
knowledge of English is preferred, as is
a similar knowledge of the official
language(s) spoken in the target country.
Knowledge of relevant indigenous
languages used by project beneficiaries
is desirable.
(c) A Monitoring and Evaluation
Officer who will oversee the
implementation of the project’s
monitoring and evaluation strategies
and requirements. This person should
have at least three years progressively
responsible experience in the
monitoring and evaluation of
international development projects,
preferably in education and training or
VerDate jul<14>2003
18:11 Jun 24, 2005
Jkt 205001
a related field. Related experience can
include strategic planning and
performance measurement, indicator
selection, quantitative and qualitative
data collection and analysis
methodologies, database management,
and knowledge of the Government
Performance and Results Act.
Individuals with a demonstrated ability
to build capacity of the project team and
partners in these domains will be given
special consideration.
Information provided on key
personnel candidates must include the
following:
• The educational background and
experience of all key personnel to be
assigned to the project.
• The special capabilities of key
personnel that demonstrate prior
experience in organizing, managing and
performing similar efforts.
• The current employment status of
key personnel and availability for this
project. The applicant must also
indicate whether the proposed work
will be performed by persons currently
employed by the applying organization
or is dependent upon planned
recruitment or sub-contracting.
ii. Other Professional Personnel—The
applicant must identify other program
personnel proposed to carry out the
requirements of this solicitation. The
applicant must also indicate whether
the proposed work by other professional
personnel will be performed by persons
currently employed by the organization
or is dependent upon planned
recruitment or sub-contracting.
iii. Management Plan—The
management plan must include the
following:
(a) A description of the functional
relationship between elements of the
project’s management structure; and
(b) The responsibilities of project staff
and management and the lines of
authority between project staff and other
elements of the project.
Note: Applicants will be rated based on the
clarity and quality of the information
provided in the management plan.
iv. Staff Loading Plan—The staff
loading plan must identify all key tasks
and the person-days required to
complete each task. Labor estimated for
each task must be broken down by
individuals assigned to the task,
including sub-contractors and
consultants. All key tasks should be
charted to show time required to
perform them by months or weeks.
v. Roles and Responsibilities—The
applicant must include a resume, as
well as a description of the roles and
responsibilities of all key and
professional personnel proposed.
PO 00000
Frm 00044
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
36959
Resumes must be submitted as an
attachment to the application and will
not count toward the page limit. If
resumes of key personnel candidates are
not submitted as part of the application,
the application will be considered
unresponsive and will be rejected.
At a minimum, each resume must
include: The individual’s current
employment status and previous work
experience, including position title,
duties, dates in position, employing
organizations, and educational
background. Duties must be clearly
defined in terms of role performed, e.g.,
manager, team leader, and/or
consultant. The application must
indicate whether the individual is
currently employed by the applicant,
and (if so) for how long.
D. Leveraging Resources (5 points)
USDOL will give up to five (5)
additional rating points to applications
that include committed non-Federal
resources that significantly expand the
dollar amount, size and scope of the
application. These programs or
activities will not be financed by the
project, but can complement and
enhance project objectives. Applicants
are also encouraged to leverage
activities, such as micro-credit,
revolving funds, or loan guarantees,
which are not directly allowable under
the cooperative agreement. To be
eligible for the additional points, the
applicant must list the source(s) of
resources, the nature, and possible
activities anticipated with these
resources under this cooperative
agreement and any partnerships,
linkages or coordination of activities,
cooperative funding, etc. Staff time of
proposed key personnel may not be
submitted as a leveraged resource.
2. Review and Selection Process
The Office of Procurement Services at
USDOL will screen all applications to
determine whether all required
elements, as identified in section IV(2)
above, are present and clearly
identifiable. If an application does not
include all of the required elements,
including required attachments, it will
be considered unresponsive and will be
rejected. Once an application is deemed
unresponsive, the Office of Procurement
will send a letter to the applicant, which
will state that the application was
incomplete, indicate which document
was missing from the application, and
explain that the technical review panel
will be unable to rate the application.
The following documents must be
included in the application package in
order for the application to be deemed
complete and responsive:
E:\FR\FM\27JNN1.SGM
27JNN1
36960
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 122 / Monday, June 27, 2005 / Notices
i. A cost proposal.
ii. A technical proposal.
iii. The applicant’s most recent audit
report.
iv. Resumes of all key personnel
candidates.
v. Signed letters of agreement to serve
on the project from all key personnel
candidates.
Each complete application will be
objectively rated by a technical review
panel against the criteria described in
this announcement. Applicants are
advised that panel recommendations to
the Grant Officer are advisory in nature.
The Grant Officer may elect to select a
Grantee on the basis of the initial
application submission; or, the Grant
Officer may establish a competitive or
technically acceptable range from which
qualified applicants will be selected. If
deemed appropriate, the Grant Officer
may call for the preparation and receipt
of final revisions of applications,
following which the evaluation process
described above may be repeated, in
whole or in part, to consider such
revisions. The Grant Officer will make
final selection determinations based on
panel findings and consideration of
factors that represent the greatest
advantage to the government, such as
cost, the availability of funds, and other
factors. If USDOL does not receive
technically acceptable applications in
response to this solicitation, USDOL
reserves the right to terminate the
competition and not make any award.
The Grant Officer’s determinations for
awards under this solicitation are final.
Note to All Applicants: Selection of
an organization as a cooperative
agreement recipient does not constitute
approval of the cooperative agreement
application as submitted. Before the
actual cooperative agreement is
awarded, USDOL may enter into
negotiations about such items as
program components, funding levels,
and administrative systems in place to
support cooperative agreement
implementation. If the negotiations do
not result in an acceptable submission,
the Grant Officer reserves the right to
terminate the negotiation and decline to
fund the application. In addition,
USDOL reserves the right to further
negotiate program components after
award, during the project design
document submission and review
process. See Section VI(3)(A).
Award of a cooperative agreement
under this solicitation may also be
contingent upon an exchange of project
support letters between USDOL and the
relevant ministries in the target country.
VerDate jul<14>2003
18:11 Jun 24, 2005
Jkt 205001
3. Anticipated Announcement and
Award Dates
Designation decisions will be made,
where possible, within 45 days after the
deadline for submission of proposals.
USDOL is not obligated to make any
awards as result of this solicitation, and
only the Grant Officer can bind USDOL
to the provision of funds under this
solicitation. Unless specifically
provided in the cooperative agreement,
USDOL’s acceptance of a proposal and/
or award of Federal funds does not
waive any cooperative agreement
requirements and/or procedures.
VI. Award Administration Information
1. Award Notices
The Grant Officer will notify
applicants of designation results as
follows:
Designation Letter: The designation
letter signed by the Grant Officer will
serve as official notice of an
organization’s designation. The
designation letter will be accompanied
by a cooperative agreement and ICLP’s
Management Procedures and Guidelines
(MPG).
Non-Designation Letter: Any
organization not designated will be
notified formally of the non-designation
and given the basic reasons for the
determination.
Notification by a person or entity
other than the Grant Officer that an
organization has or has not been
designated is not valid.
2. Administrative and National Policy
Requirements
A. General
Grantee organizations are subject to
applicable U.S. Federal laws (including
provisions of appropriations law) and
regulations, Executive Orders,
applicable Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) Circulars, and USDOL
policies. If during project
implementation a Grantee is found in
violation of U.S. government laws and
regulations, the terms of the cooperative
agreement awarded under this
solicitation may be modified by USDOL,
costs may be disallowed and recovered,
the cooperative agreement may be
terminated, and USDOL may take other
action permitted by law. Determinations
of allowable costs will be made in
accordance with the applicable U.S.
Federal cost principles.
Grantees must also submit to an
annual independent audit. Single audits
conducted under the provisions of OMB
Circular A–133 are to be submitted by
U.S. based non-profit organizations to
meet the annual independent audit
PO 00000
Frm 00045
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
requirement. For foreign-based and
private for-profit Grantees, an attestation
engagement, conducted in accordance
with U.S. ‘‘Government Auditing
Standards,’’ that includes an auditor’s
opinions on (1) compliance with the
Department’s regulations and the
provisions of the cooperative agreement
and (2) the reliability of the Grantee’s
financial and performance reports must
be submitted to meet the annual audit
requirement. Costs for these audits or
attestation engagements should be
included in direct or indirect costs,
whichever is appropriate.
The cooperative agreements awarded
under this solicitation are subject to the
following administrative standards and
provisions, and any other applicable
standards that come into effect during
the term of the cooperative agreement,
if applicable to a particular Grantee:
i. 29 CFR part 2 subpart D—Equal
Treatment in Department of Labor
Programs for Religious Organizations;
Protection of Religious Liberty of
Department of Labor Social Service
Providers and Beneficiaries.
ii. 29 CFR part 31—
Nondiscrimination in Federally
Assisted Programs of the Department of
Labor— Effectuation of Title VI of the
Civil Rights Act of 1964.
iii. 29 CFR part 32—
Nondiscrimination on the Basis of
Handicap in Programs and Activities
Receiving or Benefiting from Federal
Financial Assistance.
iv. 29 CFR part 35—
Nondiscrimination on the Basis of Age
in Programs or Activities Receiving
Federal Financial Assistance from the
Department of Labor.
v. 29 CFR part 36—Federal Standards
for Nondiscrimination on the Basis of
Sex in Education Programs or Activities
Receiving Federal Financial Assistance.
vi. 29 CFR part 93—New Restrictions
on Lobbying.
vii. 29 CFR part 95—Uniform
Administrative Requirements for Grants
and Agreements with Institutions of
Higher Education, Hospitals and other
Non-Profit Organizations, and with
Commercial Organizations, Foreign
Governments, Organizations Under the
Jurisdiction of Foreign Governments
and International Organizations.
viii. 29 CFR part 96—Federal
Standards for Audit of Federally
Funded Grants, Contracts and
Agreements.
ix. 29 CFR part 98—Federal Standards
for Government-wide Debarment and
Suspension (Nonprocurement) and
Government-wide Requirements for
Drug-Free Workplace (Grants).
E:\FR\FM\27JNN1.SGM
27JNN1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 122 / Monday, June 27, 2005 / Notices
x. 29 CFR part 99 ‘‘Federal Standards
for Audits of States, Local Governments,
and Non-Profit Organizations.
Applicants are reminded to budget for
compliance with the administrative
requirements set forth. This includes the
cost of performing administrative
activities such as annual single audits or
attestation engagements (as applicable);
closeout; mid-term and final
evaluations; project-related document
preparation, including deliverables; as
well as compliance with procurement
and property standards. Copies of all
regulations referenced in this
solicitation are available at no cost,
online, at https://www.dol.gov.
Grantees should be aware that terms
outlined in this solicitation, the
cooperative agreement, and the MPGs
are all applicable to the implementation
of projects awarded under this
solicitation.
B. Sub-contracts
The Grantee may not sub-grant any of
the funds obligated under this
cooperative agreement. Sub-granting
may not appear or be included in the
budget as a line item. However, subcontracts may be included as a budget
line item.
All relationships between the Grantee
and partner organizations receiving
funds under this solicitation must be set
forth in an appropriate joint venture,
partnership, or other contractual
agreement. Copies of such agreements
should be provided to USDOL as an
attachment to the application; copies of
such agreements will not count toward
the page limit.
Sub-contracts must be awarded in
accordance with 29 CFR 95.40–48. Subcontracts awarded after the cooperative
agreement is signed, and not proposed
in the application, must be awarded
through a formal competitive bidding
process, unless prior written approval is
obtained from USDOL.
In compliance with Executive Orders
12876, as amended, 13230, 12928 and
13021, as amended, Grantees are
strongly encouraged to provide subcontracting opportunities to Historically
Black Colleges and Universities,
Hispanic-Serving Institutions and Tribal
Colleges and Universities.
C. Key Personnel
As noted in Section V(1)(C), the
applicant must list the individuals who
have been designated as having primary
responsibility for the conduct and
completion of all project work. The
applicant must submit written proof
that key personnel (Project Director,
Education Specialist, and Monitoring
and Evaluation Officer) will be available
VerDate jul<14>2003
18:11 Jun 24, 2005
Jkt 205001
to begin work on the project no later
than 30 days after award.
After the cooperative agreement has
been awarded and throughout the life of
the project, Grantees agree to inform the
Grant Officer’s Technical Representative
(GOTR) whenever it appears impossible
for any key personnel to continue work
on the project as planned. A Grantee
may nominate substitute key personnel
and submit the nominations to the
GOTR. A Grantee may also propose
reducing the hours of key personnel;
however, a Grantee must obtain prior
approval from the Grant Officer for all
such changes to key personnel. If the
Grant Officer is unable to approve the
key personnel change, he/she reserves
the right to terminate the cooperative
agreement or disallow costs. PLEASE
NOTE: As stated in Section V(1)(B)(v),
the performance of the organization’s
key personnel on existing projects with
USDOL or other entities, and whether
the organization has a history of
replacing key personnel with equally
qualified staff, will be taken into
consideration when rating past
performance.
36961
reasonable times, to make site visits to
review project accomplishments and
management control systems and to
provide such technical assistance as
may be required. If USDOL makes any
site visit on the premises of a Grantee
or a sub-contractor(s) under this
cooperative agreement, a Grantee shall
provide and shall require its subcontractors to provide all reasonable
facilities and assistance for the safety
and convenience of government
representatives in the performance of
their duties. All site visits and
evaluations are expected to be
performed in a manner that will not
unduly delay the implementation of the
project.
D. Encumbrance of Cooperative
Agreement Funds
Cooperative agreement funds may not
be encumbered/obligated by a Grantee
before or after the period of
performance. Encumbrances/obligations
outstanding as of the end of the
cooperative agreement period may be
liquidated (paid out) after the end of the
cooperative agreement period. Such
encumbrances/obligations may involve
only specified commitments for which a
need existed during the cooperative
agreement period and that are supported
by approved contracts, purchase orders,
requisitions, invoices, bills, or other
evidence of liability consistent with a
Grantee’s purchasing procedures and
incurred within the cooperative
agreement period. All encumbrances/
obligations incurred during the
cooperative agreement period must be
liquidated within 90 days after the end
of the cooperative agreement period,
unless a longer period of time is granted
by USDOL.
All equipment purchased with project
funds must be inventoried and secured
throughout the life of the project. At the
end of the project, USDOL and the
Grantee is expected to determine how to
best allocate equipment purchased with
project funds in order to ensure
sustainability of efforts in the projects’
implementing areas.
3. Reporting and Deliverables
In addition to meeting the above
requirements, a Grantee is expected to
monitor the implementation of the
program; report to USDOL on a semiannual basis or more frequently if
deemed necessary by USDOL; and
undergo evaluations of program results.
Guidance on USDOL procedures and
management requirements will be
provided to Grantees in the MPGs with
the cooperative agreement. The project
budget must include funds to: plan,
implement, monitor, report on, and
evaluate programs and activities
(including mid-term and final
evaluations and annual single audits or
attestation engagements, as applicable);
conduct studies pertinent to project
implementation; establish education
baselines to measure program results;
and finance travel by field staff and key
personnel to meet annually with
USDOL officials in Washington, DC or
within the project’s region (e.g., Africa,
Asia, Latin America, Middle East and
North Africa, and Europe). Applicants
based both within and outside the
United States should also budget for
travel by field staff and other key
personnel to Washington, DC at the
beginning of the project for a post-award
meeting with USDOL. Indicators of
project performance must also be
proposed by a Grantee and approved by
USDOL in the Performance Monitoring
Plan, as discussed in Section VI(3)(D)
below. Unless otherwise indicated, a
Grantee must submit copies of all
required reports to USDOL by the
specified due dates. Exact timeframes
for completion of deliverables will be
addressed in the cooperative agreement
and the MPGs.
Specific deliverables are the
following:
E. Site visits
USDOL, through its authorized
representatives, has the right, at all
A. Project Design Document
As stated in Sections I(2) and IV(2),
applications must include a preliminary
PO 00000
Frm 00046
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\27JNN1.SGM
27JNN1
36962
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 122 / Monday, June 27, 2005 / Notices
project design document in the format
described in Appendix A, with design
elements linked to a logical framework
matrix. (Note: The supporting logical
framework matrix will not count in the
45-page limit but should be included as
an annex to the project document. To
guide applicants, a sample logical
framework matrix for a hypothetical
Child Labor Education Initiative project
is available at https://www.dol.gov/ilab/
grants/bkgrd.htm.) The preliminary
project document must include all
sections identified in Appendix A,
including a background/justification
section, project strategy (goal, purpose,
outputs, activities, indicators, means of
verification, assumptions), project
implementation timetable, and project
budget. The narrative must address the
criteria/themes described in the
Program Design/Budget-Cost
Effectiveness section (Section V(1)(A)
above).
Within six months after the time of
the award, the Grantee must deliver the
final project design document, based on
the application written in response to
this solicitation, including the results of
additional consultation with
stakeholders, partners, and USDOL. The
final project design document must also
include sections that address
coordination strategies, project
management and sustainability.
B. Progress and Financial Reports
The format for the progress reports
will be provided in the MPG distributed
after the award. Grantees must furnish
a typed technical progress report and a
financial report (SF 269) to USDOL on
a semi-annual basis by 31 March and 30
September of each year during the
cooperative agreement period. However,
USDOL reserves the right to require up
to four reports a year, as necessary.
Also, a copy of the Federal Cash
Transactions Report (PSC 272) must be
submitted to USDOL upon submission
to the Health and Human Services—
Payment Management System (HHS–
PMS).
C. Annual Work Plan
Grantees must develop an annual
work plan within six months of project
award for approval by USDOL so as to
ensure coordination with other relevant
social actors throughout the country.
Subsequent annual work plans must be
delivered no later than one year after the
previous one.
D. Performance Monitoring and
Evaluation Plan
Grantees must develop a performance
monitoring and evaluation plan in
collaboration with USDOL, including
VerDate jul<14>2003
18:11 Jun 24, 2005
Jkt 205001
beginning and ending dates for the
project, indicators and methods and cost
of data collection, planned and actual
dates for mid-term review, and final end
of project evaluations. The performance
monitoring plan must be developed in
conjunction with the logical framework
project design and common indicators
for reporting selected by USDOL. The
plan must include a limited number of
key indicators that can be realistically
measured within the cost parameters
allocated to project monitoring. Baseline
data collection is expected to be tied to
the indicators of the project design
document and the performance
monitoring plan. A draft monitoring and
evaluation plan must be submitted to
USDOL within six months of project
award.
E. Project Evaluations
Grantees and the GOTR will
determine on a case-by-case basis
whether mid-term evaluations will be
conducted by an internal or external
evaluation team. All final evaluations
must be external and independent in
nature. A Grantee must respond in
writing to any comments and
recommendations provided in the midterm evaluation report. The budget must
include the projected cost of mid-term
and final evaluations.
VII. Agency Contacts
All inquiries regarding this
solicitation should be directed to: Ms.
Lisa Harvey, U.S. Department of Labor,
Procurement Services Center, 200
Constitution Avenue, NW., Room N–
5416, Washington, DC 20210; telephone
(202) 693–4570 (this is not a toll-freenumber) or e-mail: harvey.lisa@dol.gov.
For a list of frequently asked questions
on USDOL’s Child Labor Education
Initiative Solicitation for Cooperative
Agreement, please visit https://
www.dol.gov/ILAB/faq/faq36.htm.
VIII. Other Information
1. Materials Prepared Under the
Cooperative Agreement
Grantees must submit to USDOL, for
approval, all media-related, awarenessraising, and educational materials
developed by the Grantee or its subcontractors before they are reproduced,
published, or used. USDOL considers
such materials to include brochures,
pamphlets, videotapes, slide-tape
shows, curricula, and any other training
materials used in the program. USDOL
will review materials for technical
accuracy and other issues.
In addition, USDOL reserves a
royalty-free, nonexclusive, and
irrevocable right to reproduce, publish,
PO 00000
Frm 00047
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
or otherwise use for Federal purposes,
and authorize others to do so, all
materials that are developed or for
which ownership is purchased by the
Grantee under an award.
2. Acknowledgment of USDOL Funding
USDOL has established procedures
and guidelines regarding
acknowledgement of funding. USDOL
requires, in most circumstances, that the
following be displayed on printed
materials:
‘‘Funding provided by the United
States Department of Labor under
Cooperative Agreement No. E–9–X–X–
XXXX.’’
With regard to press releases, requests
for proposals, bid solicitations, and
other documents describing projects or
programs funded in whole or in part
under this cooperative agreement, all
Grantees are required to consult with
USDOL on: acknowledgment of USDOL
funding; general policy issues regarding
international child labor; and informing
USDOL, to the extent possible, of major
press events and/or interviews. More
detailed guidance on acknowledgement
of USDOL funding will be provided
upon award to the Grantee(s) in the
cooperative agreement and the MPG. In
consultation with USDOL, USDOL will
be acknowledged in one of the following
ways:
A. The USDOL logo may be applied
to USDOL-funded material prepared for
worldwide distribution, including
posters, videos, pamphlets, research
documents, national survey results,
impact evaluations, best practice
reports, and other publications of global
interest. A Grantee must consult with
USDOL on whether the logo may be
used on any such items prior to final
draft or final preparation for
distribution. In no event will the
USDOL logo be placed on any item until
USDOL has given a Grantee written
permission to use the logo on the item.
B. The following notice must appear
on all documents: ‘‘This document does
not necessarily reflect the views or
policies of the U.S. Department of
Labor, nor does mention of trade names,
commercial products, or organizations
imply endorsement by the U.S.
Government.’’
3. Privacy and Freedom of Information
Any information submitted in
response to this solicitation will be
subject to the provisions of the Privacy
Act and the Freedom of Information
Act, as appropriate.
E:\FR\FM\27JNN1.SGM
27JNN1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 122 / Monday, June 27, 2005 / Notices
Signed at Washington, DC, this 21st day of
June, 2005.
Lisa Harvey,
Grant Officer.
Appendix A: Project Document Format
Executive Summary
1. Background and Justification
2. Target Groups
3. Program Approach and Strategy
3.1 Narrative of Approach and Strategy
(linked to Logical Framework matrix in
Annex A)
3.2 Project Implementation Timeline
(Gantt Chart of Activities linked to Logical
Framework matrix in Annex A)
3.3 Budget (with cost of Activities linked
to Outputs for Budget Performance
Integration in Annex B)
4. Project Monitoring and Evaluation
4.1 Indicators and Means of Verification
4.2 Baseline Data Collection Plan
5. Institutional and Management Framework
5.1 Institutional Arrangements for
Implementation
5.2 Collaborating and Implementing
Institutions (Partners) and Responsibilities
5.3 Other Donor or International
Organization Activity and Coordination
5.4 Project Management Organizational
Chart
6. Inputs
6.1 Inputs provided by USDOL
6.2 Inputs provided by the Grantee
6.3 National and/or Other Contributions
7. Sustainability
Annex A: Full presentation of the Logical
Framework matrix
Annex B: Outputs Based Budget example
(A worked example of a Logical Framework
matrix, an Outputs Based Budget, and other
background documentation for this
solicitation are available from ILAB’s Web
site at https://www.dol.gov/ilab/grants/
bkgrd.htm.)
[FR Doc. 05–12633 Filed 6–24–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–28–P
NATIONAL CREDIT UNION
ADMINISTRATION
Notice of Meeting
10 a.m., Thursday, June
30, 2005.
PLACE: Board Room, 7th Floor, Room
7047, 1775 Duke Street, Alexandria, VA
22314–3428.
STATUS: Open.
MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:
1. Notice and Request for Comment—
Federal Credit Union Bylaws.
2. Notice and Request for Comment as
Required by the Economic Growth and
Regulatory Paperwork Reduction Act of
1996 (EGRPRA).
TIME AND PLACE:
VerDate jul<14>2003
18:11 Jun 24, 2005
Jkt 205001
9:30 a.m., Thursday,
June 30, 2005.
PLACE: Board Room, 7th Floor, Room
7047, 1775 Duke Street, Alexandria, VA
22314–3428.
STATUS: Closed.
MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:
1. Delegations of Authority: Section
206 of the Federal Credit Union Act.
Closed pursuant to Exemptions (7) and
(10).
2. One (1) Insurance Appeal. Closed
pursuant to Exemptions (6) and (9)(B).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mary Rupp, Secretary of the Board,
Telephone: 703–518–6304.
TIME AND DATE:
Mary Rupp,
Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 05–12768 Filed 6–23–05; 3:02 pm]
BILLING CODE 7535–01–M
NATIONAL FOUNDATION ON THE
ARTS AND HUMANITIES
Proposed Collection; Comment
Request
National Endowment for the
Humanities, National Foundation on the
Arts and Humanities.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The National Endowment for
the Humanities (NEH) is soliciting
public comments on the proposed
information collection described below.
The proposed information collection
will be sent to the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) for review, as
required by the provisions of the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
DATES: Comments on this information
collection must be submitted on or
before August 26, 2005.
ADDRESSES: Send comments to Ms.
Susan Daisey, Director, Office of Grant
Management, National Endowment for
the Humanities, 1100 Pennsylvania
Avenue, NW., Room 311, Washington,
DC 20506, or by e-mail to:
sdaisey@neh.gov. Telephone: 202–606–
8494.
The
National Endowment for the Humanities
will submit the proposed information
collection to OMB for review, as
required by the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–13, 44 U.S.C.
Chapter 35). This notice is soliciting
comments from members of the public
and affected agencies. NEH is
particularly interested in comments
which help the agency to: (1) Evaluate
whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
PO 00000
Frm 00048
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
36963
agency, including whether the
information will have practical utility;
(2) evaluate the accuracy of the agency’s
estimate of the burden of the proposed
collection of information, including the
validity of the methodology and
assumptions used; (3) enhance the
quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and (4)
minimize the burden of the collection of
information on those who are to
respond, including through the use of
electronic submissions of responses.
This notice also lists the following
information:
Type of Review: New collection.
Agency: National Endowment for the
Humanities.
Title of Proposal: General Clearance
Authority to Develop Evaluation
Instruments for the National
Endowment for the Humanities.
OMB Number: N/A.
Affected Public: NEH grantees.
Total Respondents: 750.
Frequency of Collection: On occasion.
Total Responses: 750.
Average Time per Response: 30
minutes.
Estimated Total Burden Hours: 375
hours.
Comments submitted in response to
this notice will be summarized and/or
included in the request for Office of
Management and Budget approval of the
information collection request. They
will also become a matter of public
record.
Lynne Munson,
Deputy Chairman.
[FR Doc. 05–12669 Filed 6–24–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7536–01–P
NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION
Notice of the Availability of Finding of
No Significant Impact for a
Biocomplexity Study of the Response
of Tundra Carbon Balance to Warming
and Drying Across Multiple Time
Scales
National Science Foundation.
Notice of availability of a
finding of no significant impact for
proposed activities in the Arctic.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The National Science
Foundation gives notice of the
availability of a finding of no significant
impact for proposed activities in the
Arctic.
The Office of Polar Programs (OPP)
has prepared an Environmental
Assessment of a Biocomplexity Study of
the Response of Tundra Carbon Balance
to Warming and Drying Across Multiple
E:\FR\FM\27JNN1.SGM
27JNN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 122 (Monday, June 27, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 36949-36963]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-12633]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Office of the Secretary
Combating Exploitive Child Labor Through Education in Ecuador
AGENCY: Bureau of International Labor Affairs, Department of Labor.
Announcement Type: New. Notice of Availability of Funds and
Solicitation for Cooperative Agreement Applications.
Funding Opportunity Number: SGA 05-06.
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance (CFDA) Number: Not
applicable.
Key Dates: Deadline for Submission of Application is August 11,
2005.
SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of International Labor
Affairs, will award up to U.S. $4 million through one or more
cooperative agreements to an organization or organizations to improve
access to and quality of education programs as a means to combat
exploitive child labor among indigenous children in Ecuador. Projects
funded under this solicitation will provide educational and training
opportunities to indigenous children as a means of removing and/or
preventing them from engaging in exploitive work or the worst forms of
child labor. The activities funded will complement and expand upon
existing projects and programs to improve basic education in the
country of interest. Applications must respond to the entire Statement
of Work outlined in this solicitation. In Ecuador, activities under
these cooperative agreements will provide the direct delivery of
quality basic education to indigenous working children and those at
risk of entering work, and will result in their enrollment,
persistence, and completion of an education or training program.
I. Funding Opportunity Description
The U.S. Department of Labor (USDOL), Bureau of International Labor
Affairs (ILAB), announces the availability of funds to be awarded by
cooperative agreement to one or more qualifying organizations for the
purpose of expanding access to and quality of basic education and
strengthening government and civil society's capacity to address the
education needs of indigenous working children and those at risk of
entering work in Ecuador. The overall purpose of USDOL's Child Labor
Education Initiative, as consistently enunciated in USDOL
appropriations FY 2000 through FY 2005, is to work toward the
elimination of the worst forms of child labor through the provision of
basic education. Accordingly, entities applying under this solicitation
must develop and implement strategies for the prevention and withdrawal
of children from the worst forms of child labor, consistent with this
purpose. ILAB is authorized to award and administer this program by the
Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2005, Pub. L. 108-447, 118 Stat. 2809
(2004). The cooperative agreement or cooperative agreements awarded
under this initiative will be managed by ILAB's International Child
Labor Program (ICLP) to ensure achievement of the stated goals.
Applicants are encouraged to be creative in proposing cost-effective
interventions that will have a demonstrable impact in promoting school
attendance and completion in the geographical areas where children are
engaging in or are most at risk of engaging in the worst forms of child
labor.
1. Background and Program Scope
A. USDOL Support of Global Elimination of Exploitive Child Labor
The International Labor Organization (ILO) estimated that 211
million children ages 5 to 14 were working around the world in 2000.
Full-time child workers are generally unable to attend school, and
part-time child laborers balance economic survival with schooling from
an early age, often to the detriment of their education. Since 1995,
USDOL has provided close to U.S. $400 million in technical assistance
funding to combat exploitive child labor in approximately 70 countries
around the world.
Programs funded by USDOL range from targeted action programs in
specific sectors to more comprehensive efforts that target the worst
forms of child labor as defined by ILO Convention 182. Convention 182
lists four categories of the worst forms of child labor, and calls for
their immediate elimination:
All forms of slavery or practices similar to slavery, such
as the sale and trafficking of children; debt bondage and serfdom and
forced or compulsory labor; including forced or compulsory recruitment
of children for use in armed conflict;
The use, procurement or offering of a child for
prostitution, production of pornography or pornographic performances;
The use, procurement or offering of a child for illicit
activities in particular for the production and trafficking of drugs as
defined in the relevant international treaties;
Work which by its nature or by the circumstances by which
it is carried out, is likely to harm the health, safety, and morals of
children.
In determining the types of work likely to harm the health, safety
and morals of children, Recommendation 190 to Convention 182 considers
the following: work which exposes a child to physical, psychological or
sexual abuse; work underground, underwater, at dangerous heights or in
confined workplaces; work with dangerous machinery, equipment and tools
or handling or transporting heavy loads; work in an unhealthy
environment including exposure to hazardous substances, agents or
processes, or to
[[Page 36950]]
temperatures, noise levels or vibrations damaging to the health; work
for long hours or night work where the child is unreasonably confined
to the premises.
From FY 2001 to FY 2005, the U.S. Congress has appropriated over US
$180 million to USDOL for a Child Labor Education Initiative to fund
programs aimed at increasing access to quality, basic education in
areas with a high incidence of abusive and exploitive child labor. The
cooperative agreement(s) awarded under this solicitation will be funded
through this initiative.
USDOL's Child Labor Education Initiative seeks to nurture the
development, health, safety and enhanced future employability of
children around the world by increasing access to and quality of basic
education for working children and those at risk of entering work. The
elimination of exploitive child labor depends, to a large extent, on
improving access to, quality of, and relevance of education.
In addition to providing direct education and training
opportunities to working children and those at risk of engaging in
exploitive work, the Child Labor Education Initiative has four goals:
i. Raise awareness of the importance of education for all children
and mobilize a wide array of actors to improve and expand education
infrastructures;
ii. Strengthen formal and transitional education systems that
encourage working children and those at risk of working to attend
school;
iii. Strengthen national institutions and policies on education and
child labor; and
iv. Ensure the long-term sustainability of these efforts.
B. Barriers to Education for Working Children, Country Background, and
Focus of Solicitation
Throughout the world, there are complex causes of exploitive child
labor as well as barriers to education for children engaging in or at
risk of engaging in exploitive child labor. These include: poverty;
education system barriers; infrastructure barriers; legal and policy
barriers; resource gaps; institutional barriers; informational gaps;
demographic characteristics of children and/or families; cultural and
traditional practices; and weak labor markets and enforcement.
Although these elements and characteristics tend to exist
throughout the world in areas with a high incidence of exploitive child
labor, they manifest themselves in specific ways in Ecuador. Therefore,
specific, targeted interventions are required. The project must provide
or facilitate the delivery of educational services to at risk or
working indigenous children, support the collection of data on this
target population, and build the capacity of national institutions to
address child labor and education issues for indigenous children.
A recent report by the International Labor Organization's
International Program on the Elimination of Child Labor (ILO/IPEC) on
indigenous and tribal children (cited below) indicates that indigenous
children in Latin America are twice as likely to work as their non-
indigenous peers, including in the worst forms of child labor. Removing
indigenous children from this type of work and providing them with
educational opportunities poses many challenges, which include
addressing issues of ethnicity and multiculturalism, poverty,
marginalization, and lack of access that indigenous groups have
historically had to many rights of citizenship. This solicitation seeks
project strategies that provide innovative, constructive approaches to
address the barriers faced by indigenous children, and successful
models to remove them from exploitive child labor and provide them with
access to quality education.
For this project, applicants must be able to identify the specific
barriers to education and the education needs of specific children
targeted in their project (e.g., children withdrawn from work, children
at high risk of dropping out of school and joining the labor force,
and/or children still working in a particular sector) and how direct
education service delivery, capacity building and policy change can be
used to address particular barriers and needs. Brief background
information on education and exploitive child labor in Ecuador is
provided below.
For additional information on child labor and education for
indigenous children and exploitive child labor in Ecuador, applicants
are strongly encouraged to refer to Indigenous and tribal children:
Assessing child labour and education challenges. Larsen, Peter Billie.
ILO/IPEC/COOP INDISCO. Child Labour and Education Working Paper, June
2003 and The Department of Labor's 2003 Findings on the Worst Forms of
Child Labor available at https://www.ilo.org/public/english/standards/
ipec/publ/download/edu_indigenous_2003_en.pdf and https://
www.dol.gov/ILAB/media/reports/iclp/tda2003/overview.htm or in hard
copy from Lisa Harvey, U.S. Department of Labor, Procurement Services
Center, telephone (202) 693-4570 (this is not a toll-free-number) or e-
mail: harvey.lisa@dol.gov.
Barriers to Education for Indigenous Working Children in Ecuador
In 2002, the ILO estimated that 3.9 percent of children ages 10 to
14 years in Ecuador were working. A large percentage of working
children between the ages of 5 and 17 years are found in rural areas of
the sierra, or highlands, followed by the Amazon and urban coastal
areas. In rural areas, young children are often found performing unpaid
agricultural labor for their families. Children as young as 8 years of
age have been found working under hazardous conditions on banana
plantations and in the cut-flower sector. The migration of the rural
poor to cities has increased the incidence of child labor in urban
areas where children work in commerce and services, as messengers and
domestics, and in the informal sector. The commercial sexual
exploitation of children also occurs in Ecuador.
Ecuador is home to 27 indigenous nationalities and peoples, the
majority of whom live in the highlands and the Amazon regions.
According to the National Committee on the Progressive Eradication of
Child Labor (CONEPTI), approximately 17 percent of working children in
Ecuador belong to an indigenous group, and 72 percent of indigenous
children work before the age of 15 (as compared to 54 percent of non-
indigenous children).
The Ecuadorian Constitution requires that all children attend
school until they achieve a basic nine years of education, but multiple
barriers may not allow children to achieve this level. Families often
face significant education-related expenses such as fees and
transportation costs. Inequitable classroom coverage between primary
and secondary levels, poor teaching quality, sparse teaching materials,
a short school day and the inefficient distribution of human, financial
and teaching resources are also problems within the educational system.
For indigenous communities who have often been deprived of access to
education, schools, including those that provide bilingual (Spanish-
Quechua) intercultural education, are symbolically important and
desired, even though indigenous children who attend them may also work.
Ecuador has a number of national and donor-supported programs to
address child labor and education, and others to focus on the needs of
indigenous populations. The Government of Ecuador, through CONEPTI,
oversees its National Plan for the Progressive Elimination of Child
Labor 2003-2006
[[Page 36951]]
as part of its commitment to ratifying ILO Convention No. 182 on the
Worst Forms of Child Labor. The government has identified six sectors
as priorities for the progressive elimination of child labor: Mining,
garbage dumps, construction, flower production, banana production and
commercial sexual exploitation. USDOL has funded a number of child
labor and education projects in Ecuador.
There are a number of Ecuadorian government programs such as the
National Council on Children and Adolescents, and the National Child
and Family Institute (INNFA) to address children's issues, reintegrate
working children and adolescents into the school system, and provide
vocational training. Various government programs under different
ministries and the Central Bank, often supported by donors such as the
World Food Program and United Nations Development Program (UNDP),
include school feeding, educational stipends and scholarships,
vocational training and shelters for exploited children. A U.S. $200
million IDB loan for a Social Sector Reform Program supports the
government's plan to coordinate and improve fragmented social spending
and channel it through a Child Development Fund. A similar fund will be
created for school feeding and food/nutrition programs.
Several programs also operate to the benefit of indigenous groups.
For indigenous children, Ecuador's National Office of Intercultural
Bilingual Education, funded by the Ministry of Education and Culture,
oversees close to 2,000 basic bilingual education institutions.
Ecuador's Fund for the Development of Indigenous Groups, an autonomous
entity attached to the Executive Branch, coordinates its actions with
the Council for the Development of the Indigenous Nationalities of
Ecuador (CODENPE). The role of the fund is to support projects that
promote the development and technical capacity of indigenous
communities.
2. Statement of Work
Taking into account the challenges of educating working children in
Ecuador, the applicant must implement creative, innovative and targeted
approaches to promote policies and services that will enhance the
provision of educational opportunities for indigenous children involved
in or at risk of entering exploitive child labor. In consultations with
USDOL, the Government of Ecuador has expressed its continued support to
USDOL-funded child labor projects. Projects funded under this
cooperative agreement solicitation must focus on direct education
service(s) delivery to targeted children, including the provision of
educational services that address the specific gaps/challenges that
prevent working or at-risk indigenous children from attending or
staying in school. Needs expressed by Ecuadorian organizations working
with indigenous children are the lack of resources for bilingual
education, poor infrastructure in rural schools, and shortage of
teachers.
USDOL defines educational services and/or training opportunities as
follows: (1) Non-formal or basic literacy education, as demonstrated by
enrollment in educational classes provided by the program. These
classes may include transitional, leveling, or literacy classes so that
a child may either be mainstreamed into formal school and/or can
participate in vocational training activities; (2) Vocational, pre-
vocational, or skills training, as demonstrated by enrollment in
training courses in order to develop a particular skill (e.g.,
mechanics, sewing, etc); (3) Mainstreaming/Transitioning into the
formal education system, non-formal education, vocational, pre-
vocational, or skills training after having received assistance from
the project to enable them to enroll in such programs. The assistance
provided by the project could include one or more of the following
services: The provision of school meals, uniforms, books, school
supplies and materials, tuition and transportation vouchers, or other
types of incentives that enable the child to be enrolled in an
education program; and (4) Formal school enrollment, by directly
supporting a child's enrollment, retention, and completion in the
formal school system. Similar to the assistance provided under
mainstreaming, assistance provided by the project could include one or
more of the following services: The provision of uniforms, books,
school supplies and materials, tuition and transportation vouchers, or
other types of incentives that enable the child to be enrolled and
maintained in the formal school system. Activities such as awareness
raising and social mobilization campaigns, psychosocial services for
children, improvements in curriculum, teacher training or improvements
to school infrastructure are important for improving access to and
quality of basic education. While grantees are encouraged to address
the needs of working children in a comprehensive manner, these
activities will not be considered as direct services for individual
children. Rather direct services are those that meet the basic needs of
individual children that are direct beneficiaries of the project.
Through improved policies and direct education service delivery, as
applicable, the expected outcomes/results of the project are to: (1)
Reduce the number of indigenous children engaging in or at risk of
engaging in exploitive child labor; (2) increase educational
opportunities and access (enrollment) for children who are engaging in
or at risk of engaging in and/or removed from exploitive child labor,
particularly its worst forms; (3) encourage retention in and completion
of educational programs; and (4) expand the successful transition of
children from non-formal education programs into formal schools or
vocational programs.
The applicant must identify a target number of urban and/or rural
indigenous children engaging in or at risk of engaging in exploitive
and/or worst forms of child labor in Ecuador, who would be the direct
beneficiaries of a Child Labor Education Initiative project, and the
geographic areas of greatest need. Direct beneficiaries are children
who are withdrawn or prevented from entering exploitive child labor,
particularly its worst forms, by USDOL-funded projects. Children
withdrawn from exploitive work are those children who were found
working and no longer work as a result of a project intervention. This
category also includes those children who were engaged in exploitive
work and as a result of a project's intervention now work shorter hours
under safer conditions. Children prevented from entering work are those
children who are either siblings of (ex) working children or those
children that are considered to be at high risk of engaging in
exploitive work. In order to be considered withdrawn or prevented, the
child must benefit from educational or training opportunities. This is
measured by enrollment into school or training programs. The overall
project objective must be to remove these children from exploitive or
worst forms of child labor and to provide them with educational and
other services to prevent them from returning to exploitive and/or
worst forms of child labor.
In preparing the application, in order to identify gaps, unmet
needs, and opportunities that could be addressed through a USDOL Child
Labor Education Initiative project, applicants must conduct a needs
assessment to make a preliminary identification of the current working
and educational status of the children that the applicant proposes as
beneficiaries. It is expected that the information gathered during
[[Page 36952]]
this assessment will be refined after award. The assessment, with data
sources, must include information on the incidence and nature of
exploitive child labor, particularly the worst forms, among target
children, hours of work, age and sex distribution of the proposed
beneficiaries, educational performance relative to other children, if
available, and any research or other data that might indicate
correlations between educational performance and hours of work.
Applicants are also encouraged to propose strategies for collecting
further data on exploitive child labor and children's participation in
schooling in the early stages of the project's baseline data
collection.
When developing their proposed strategy and writing the
application, applicants must consult and make reference to relevant
literature and documents relating to child labor and the education of
target children in Ecuador. Furthermore, the application must
demonstrate familiarity with existing child labor, education and social
welfare policies, plans and projects in Ecuador, particularly those
pertaining to indigenous populations, which the applicant is using to
inform project design for target children.
Applicants will also be evaluated on their knowledge of other
donors' programs as they pertain to the education of target children in
Ecuador. The applicant must consider the design of other USDOL-funded
child labor projects in Ecuador implemented by the ILO-IPEC and
Catholic Relief Services, and not target the same beneficiaries. In
identifying unmet needs, gaps and opportunities not being addressed by
existing programs and current efforts, and in proposing their own
strategy, applicants must show how their knowledge of the school
calendar and the requirements of basic, non-formal, and vocational
education systems will be used to develop an approach that successfully
enrolls children in educational programs most quickly and without
missing an academic year or program cycle. The applicant must identify
the direct cost per child of maintaining the child in the educational
program, and of withdrawing the child from exploitive or worst forms of
child labor. These costs must be realistic, and based on existing costs
of similar programs. Applicants must design and implement a project
monitoring system that allows for the tracking of direct beneficiaries'
work and school status. In addition, as child labor projects tend to be
implemented in resource-poor environments where government education
and labor inspection systems may be limited, applicants are encouraged
to work with local stakeholders to develop sustainable child labor and
education monitoring systems, including community based systems, that
can complement government efforts to monitor children's working and
educational status beyond the life of the project. The applicant must
also identify organizations in Ecuador, including indigenous
organizations, which could potentially implement or contribute to a
future project. Applicants are encouraged to develop approaches that
support youth participation within efforts to eliminate the worst forms
of child labor.
The application must also take into account cross-cutting themes
that could affect project results in Ecuador, and meaningfully
incorporate them into the proposed strategy, either to increase
opportunities or reduce threats to successful implementation. In
Ecuador these include:
(1) Indigenous culture. Applicants should demonstrate profound
knowledge of Ecuadorian indigenous culture and movements, and
indigenous values regarding education and child labor. This knowledge
should be incorporated into the project design to ensure ownership by
indigenous groups. The project should develop a strategy to collaborate
with and involve indigenous opinion leaders, and indigenous and non-
indigenous business leaders interested in corporate social
responsibility.
(2) Political and Legal Environment. In their approach to project
interventions, applicants should take into account the current legal
and political relationship between indigenous groups and government
structures. Applicants should also factor in the effect that personnel
changes in cooperating ministries might have, and design strategies
that minimize disruptions when such events occur.
(3) Weak organizational capacity and conflictive social relations.
Evaluations of USDOL projects in the Andean region have noted incidents
of weak local organizational capacity and conflictive social relations,
including teachers' strikes leading to absenteeism. Applicants should
indicate to what extent these challenges might be significant in the
areas where the project would be implemented, how they would be
addressed, and how relationships between indigenous and non-indigenous
organizations would be developed.
(4) Educational relevance and language of instruction. The
applicant must develop a strategy that will increase the perceived
relevance of education for indigenous children, their parents, and the
communities where they live. If language of instruction makes a
difference to parents and children, the applicant must show how
bilingual education programs would be used as part of the project
design.
(5) Other possible activities or services. Applicants should
address and incorporate activities or services that would address the
multiple barriers that could prevent the withdrawal of Ecuadorian
indigenous children from exploitive work, and their participation in
education programs. Applicants should also identify and address
additional social, cultural, or other factors that should be taken into
account in designing a project for indigenous working children or
children at risk of working in Ecuador.
Note to Applicants: All applicants must have country presence, or
partner with an established and eligible organization in Ecuador. In
the course of implementation, the project must promote the goals of
USDOL's Child Labor Education Initiative listed above in Section
I(1)(A). In addition, a project funded under this solicitation must
provide educational and training opportunities to children as a means
to remove and/or prevent them from engaging in exploitive work. Because
of the limited resources available under this award, applicants are
expected to implement programs that complement existing efforts and,
where appropriate, replicate or enhance successful models to serve a
greater number of children and communities. However, applicants must
not duplicate the activities of existing efforts and/or projects and
are expected to work within host government child labor and education
frameworks. To avoid duplication, enhance collaboration, expand impact,
and develop synergies, the cooperative agreement awardee (hereafter
referred to as ``Grantee'') must work cooperatively with national
stakeholders in developing project interventions. Applicants are
expected to consider the economic and social contexts of Ecuador when
formulating project strategies.
USDOL will notify host government ministry officials of the
proposed project. During the preparation of an application for this
cooperative agreement solicitation, applicants may discuss proposed
interventions, strategies, and activities with host government
officials and civil society organizations.
Partnerships between more than one organization are also eligible
and are encouraged, particularly, given the target group of indigenous
children, partnerships with indigenous, country-
[[Page 36953]]
based organizations in order to build those organizations' capacity. If
a partnership is proposed, a lead organization must be identified, and
relationships with partner organizations receiving funds must be
codified in an appropriate joint venture, partnership, or other
contractual agreement. Partnerships with non-indigenous organizations
already working to provide services to indigenous children are also
acceptable. Copies of such agreements should be submitted as an
attachment to the application, and will not count toward the page
limit.
Applicants are strongly encouraged to enroll at least one-quarter
of the children targeted by the proposed program in educational
activities during the first year of project implementation. Under this
cooperative agreement solicitation, vocational training for adolescents
and income generating alternatives for parents are allowable
activities. Please note: USDOL reserves the right to approve or
disapprove alternative income-generating activities after award of the
cooperative agreement. Permissible costs related to alternative income-
generating activities for target families may include, but are not
limited to, skills training, tools, equipment, guides, manuals, and
market feasibility studies. However, as stated in Section IV(5)(B)(i),
Grantees and sub-contractors may not provide direct cash transfers to
communities, parents, or children.
Although USDOL is open to all proposals for innovative solutions to
address the challenges of providing increased access to education for
the children targeted, the applicant must, at a minimum, follow the
outline of a preliminary project design document presented in Appendix
A, and, within that format, address all criteria, factors, and required
descriptions identified in Sections IV(2), V(1)(A), VI(3)(A) and
VI(3)(D). This response will be the foundation for the final project
document that must be approved within six months after award of the
cooperative agreement.
If the application does not propose interventions aimed toward the
target group or geographical area as identified, then the application
will be considered unresponsive and will be rejected.
Note to All Applicants: Grantees are expected to consult with and
work cooperatively with stakeholders in the country, including the
Ministries of Education, Labor, and other relevant ministries, non-
governmental organizations (NGOs), national steering/advisory
committees on child labor, education, faith and community-based
organizations, and working children and their families. Grantees should
ensure that their proposed activities and interventions are consistent
with those of Ecuador's national child labor and education frameworks
and priorities, as applicable. Grantees are strongly encouraged to
collaborate with existing projects, particularly those funded by USDOL,
including Timebound Programs and other projects implemented by the ILO/
IPEC. As discussed in Section V(1)(D), up to five (5) extra points will
be given to applications that include committed non-Federal resources
that significantly expand the project's scope. However, applicants are
instructed that the project budget submitted with the application must
include all necessary and sufficient funds, without reliance on other
contracts, grants, or awards, to implement the applicant's proposed
project activities and to achieve proposed project goals and objectives
under this solicitation. If anticipated funding from another contract,
grant, or award fails to materialize, USDOL will not provide additional
funding to cover these costs.
II. Award Information
Type of assistance instrument: cooperative agreement. USDOL's
involvement in project implementation and oversight is outlined in
Section VI(2). The duration of the project(s) funded by this
solicitation is up to four (4) years. The start date of program
activities will be negotiated upon awarding of the cooperative
agreement, but will be no later than September 30, 2005.
Up to U.S. $4 million will be awarded under this solicitation.
USDOL may award one or more cooperative agreements to one, several, or
a partnership of more than one organization(s) that may apply to
implement the program. A Grantee must obtain prior USDOL approval for
any sub-contractor proposed in the application before award of the
cooperative agreement. The Grantee may not sub-grant any of the funds
obligated under this cooperative agreement. See Section VI(2)(B) for
further information on sub-contracts.
III. Eligibility Information
1. Eligible Applicants
Any commercial, international, educational, or non-profit
organization, including any faith-based, community-based, or public
international organization capable of successfully developing and
implementing education programs for working children or children at
risk of entering exploitive work in Ecuador is eligible to apply.
Partnerships of more than one organization are also eligible, and
applicants are strongly encouraged to work with organizations already
undertaking projects in Ecuador, particularly local NGOs, including
faith-based and community-based organizations, and non-governmental
indigenous organizations. In the case of partnership applications, a
lead organization must be identified, and the relationship with any
partner organizations receiving funds must be set forth in an
appropriate joint venture, partnership, or other contractual agreement.
An applicant must demonstrate a country presence, independently or
through a relationship with another organization(s) with country
presence, which gives it the ability to initiate program activities
upon award of the cooperative agreement. See Section V(1)(B)(ii).
Please Note: Applications from foreign government and quasi-government
agencies will not be considered.
Applicants applying for more than one cooperative agreement must
submit a separate application for each country. If applications for
more than one of the cooperative agreements are combined, they will not
be considered. (All applicants are requested to complete the Survey on
Ensuring Equal Opportunity for Applicants (OMB No. 1225-0083), which is
available online at https://www.dol.gov/ilab/grants/bkgrd.htm). The
capability of an applicant or applicants to perform necessary aspects
of this solicitation will be determined under the criteria outlined in
the Application Review Information section of this solicitation
(Section V(1)).
Please note that to be eligible, cooperative agreement applicants
classified under the Internal Revenue Code as a 501(c)(4) entity (see
26 U.S.C. 501(c)(4)), may not engage in lobbying activities. According
to the Lobbying Disclosure Act of 1995, as codified at 2 U.S.C. 1611,
an organization, as described in section 501(c)(4) of the Internal
Revenue Code of 1986, that engages in lobbying activities directed
toward the U.S. Government will not be eligible for the receipt of
Federal funds constituting an award, grant, cooperative agreement, or
loan.
2. Cost Sharing or Matching Funds
This solicitation does not require applicants to share costs or
provide matching funds. However, the leveraging of resources and in-
kind contributions is strongly encouraged and is a rating factor worth
up to five (5) additional points.
[[Page 36954]]
3. Other Eligibility Criteria
In accordance with 29 CFR part 98, entities that are debarred or
suspended from receiving federal contracts or grants shall be excluded
from Federal financial assistance and are ineligible to receive funding
under this solicitation. In judging organizational capacity, USDOL will
take into account not only information provided by an applicant, but
also information from USDOL, other Federal agencies, and other
organizations regarding past performance of organizations that have
implemented or are implementing Child Labor Education Initiative
projects, or other projects or activities for USDOL and other Federal
agencies (see Section V(1)(B)). Past performance will be rated by such
factors as the timeliness of deliverables, and the responsiveness of
the organization and its staff to USDOL or grantor communications
regarding deliverables and cooperative agreement or contractual
requirements. In addition, USDOL will consider the performance of the
organization's key personnel on existing projects with USDOL or other
entities, the frequency of the organization's replacement of key
personnel, and the quality and timeliness of such key personnel
replacements. Lack of past experience with USDOL projects, cooperative
agreements, grants, or contracts is not a bar to eligibility or
selection under this solicitation.
Faith-based organizations may apply for Federal funds under this
solicitation. Neutral, non-religious criteria that neither favor nor
disfavor religion will be employed in the selection of cooperative
agreement recipients. Similarly, neutral, non-religious criteria that
neither favor nor disfavor religion must be employed by Grantees in the
selection of project beneficiaries and sub-contractors.
In addition, per the provisions outlined in Section 2 of Executive
Order 13279 and 29 CFR 2.33(b), the U.S. Government is generally
prohibited from providing direct financial assistance for inherently
religious activities. Funds awarded under this solicitation may not be
used for religious instruction, worship, prayer, proselytizing or other
inherently religious activities.
IV. Application and Submission Information
1. Address to Request Application Package
This solicitation contains all of the necessary information and
forms needed to apply for cooperative agreement funding. This
solicitation is published as part of this Federal Register notice.
Additional copies of the Federal Register may be obtained from your
nearest U.S. Government office or public library or online at https://
www.archives.gov/federal_register/.
2. Content and Form of Application Submission
Applicants must submit one (1) blue ink-signed original, complete
application in English, plus two (2) copies of the application.
Applicants may submit applications for one or more countries. In the
case where an applicant is interested in applying for a cooperative
agreement in more than one country, a separate application must be
submitted for each country. If applications for multiple countries are
combined, the application will be considered unresponsive and will be
rejected.
The application must consist of two (2) separate parts, as well as
a table of contents and an abstract summarizing the application in not
more than two (2) pages. The table of contents and the abstract are not
included in the 45-page limit for Part II. Applicants should number all
pages of the application.
Part I of the application, the cost proposal, must contain the
Standard Form (SF) 424, Application for Federal Assistance and Sections
A-F of the Budget Information Form SF 424A, available from ILAB's Web
site at https://www.dol.gov/ilab/grants/bkgrd.htm. Copies of these forms
are also available online from the General Services Administration Web
site at https://contacts.gsa.gov/webforms. nsf/0/
B835648D66D1B8F985256A 72004 C58C2/ $file/ sf424.pdf and https://
contacts.gsa.gov/webforms.nsf/0/5AEB1FA6 FB3B8323 85256A72004C8E77/
$file/Sf424a. pdf. The individual signing the SF 424 on behalf of the
applicant must be authorized to bind the applicant. The budget/cost
proposal and any other accompanying charts or graphs must be written in
10-12 pitch font size.
Part II, the technical proposal, must provide a technical
application that identifies and explains the proposed program and
demonstrates the applicant's capabilities to carry out that proposal.
The technical application must identify how the applicant will carry
out the Statement of Work (Section I(2) of this solicitation) and
address each of the Application Evaluation Criteria found in Section
V(1).
The Part II technical application must not exceed 45 single-sided
(8\1/2\'' x 11''), double-spaced, 10 to 12 pitch typed pages, and must
include responses to the application evaluation criteria outlined in
Section V(1) of this solicitation. Part II must include a preliminary
project design document submitted in the format shown in Appendix A and
discussed further in Section VI(3)(A). The application must include the
name, address, telephone and fax numbers, and e-mail address (if
applicable) of a key contact person at the applicant's organization in
case questions should arise.
Applications will only be accepted in English. To be considered
responsive to this solicitation, the application must consist of the
above-mentioned separate parts. Any applications that do not conform to
these standards may be deemed unresponsive to this solicitation and may
be rejected. Standard forms and attachments are not included in the 45-
page limit for Part II. However, any additional information not
required under this solicitation will not be considered.
3. Submission Dates, Times, and Address
Applications must be delivered (by hand or mail) by 4:45 p.m.,
Eastern Time, August 11, 2005 to: U.S. Department of Labor, Procurement
Services Center, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW., Room N-5416, Washington,
D.C. 20210, Attention: Lisa Harvey, Reference: Solicitation 05-06.
Applications sent by e-mail, telegram, or facsimile (FAX) will not be
accepted. Applications sent by non-Postal Service delivery services,
such as Federal Express or UPS, will be accepted; however, the
applicant bears the responsibility for timely submission. The
application package must be received at the designated place by the
date and time specified or it will be considered unresponsive and will
be rejected. Any application received at the Procurement Services
Center after the deadline will not be considered unless it is received
before the award is made and:
A. It is determined by the Government that the late receipt was due
solely to mishandling by the Government after receipt at USDOL at the
address indicated; and/or
B. It was sent by registered or certified mail not later than the
fifth calendar day before the deadline; or
C. It was sent by U.S. Postal Service Express Mail Next Day
Service-Post Office to Addressee, not later than 5 p.m. at the place of
mailing two (2) working days, excluding weekends and Federal holidays,
prior to the deadline.
The only acceptable evidence to establish the date of mailing of a
late
[[Page 36955]]
application sent by registered or certified mail is the U.S. Postal
Service postmark on the envelope or wrapper and on the original receipt
from the U.S. Postal Service. If the postmark is not legible, an
application received after the above closing time and date shall be
processed as if mailed late. ``Postmark'' means a printed, stamped, or
otherwise placed impression (not a postage meter machine impression)
that is readily identifiable without further action as having been
applied and affixed by an employee of the U.S. Postal Service on the
date of mailing. Therefore, applicants should request that the postal
clerk place a legible hand cancellation ``bull's-eye'' postmark on both
the receipt and the envelope or wrapper.
The only acceptable evidence to establish the date of mailing of a
late application sent by U.S. Postal Service Express Mail Next Day
Service-Post Office to Addressee is the date entered by the Post Office
clerk on the ``Express Mail Next Day Service-Post Office to Addressee''
label and the postmark on the envelope or wrapper on the original
receipt from the U.S. Postal Service. ``Postmark'' has the same meaning
as defined above. Therefore, applicants should request that the postal
clerk place a legible hand cancellation ``bull's-eye'' postmark on both
the receipt and the envelope or wrapper.
The only acceptable evidence to establish the time of receipt at
USDOL is the Procurement Service Center's date/time stamp on the
application wrapper or other documentary evidence of receipt maintained
by that office.
Confirmation of receipt can be obtained from Lisa Harvey, U.S.
Department of Labor, Procurement Services Center, telephone (202) 693-
4570 (this is not a toll-free-number) or e-mail: harvey.lisa@dol.gov.
All applicants are advised that U.S. mail delivery in the Washington,
DC area can be slow and erratic due to concerns involving
contamination. All applicants must take this into consideration when
preparing to meet the application deadline.
4. Intergovernmental Review
This funding opportunity is not subject to Executive Order 12372,
``Intergovernmental Review of Federal Programs.''
5. Funding Restrictions
A. In addition to those specified under OMB Circular A-122, the
following costs are also unallowable:
i. Construction with funds under this cooperative agreement is
subject to USDOL approval and ordinarily should not exceed 10 percent
of the project budget's direct costs and is expected to be limited to
improving existing school infrastructure and facilities in the
project's targeted communities. USDOL encourages applicants to cost-
share and/or leverage funds or in-kind contributions from local
partners when proposing construction activities in order to ensure
sustainability.
ii. Under these cooperative agreements, vocational training for
adolescents and income-generating alternatives for parents are
allowable activities. However, Federal funds under these cooperative
agreements cannot be used to provide micro-credits, revolving funds, or
loan guarantees. Please note: USDOL reserves the right to negotiate the
exact nature, form, or scope of alternative income-generating
activities after award of the cooperative agreement. Permissible costs
related to alternative income-generating activities may include, but
are not limited to, skills training, tools, equipment, guides, manuals,
and market feasibility studies.
iii. Awards will not allow reimbursement of pre-award costs.
B. The following activities are also unallowable under this
solicitation:
i. The Grantee may not sub-grant any of the funds obligated under
this cooperative agreement. Sub-granting may not appear or be included
in the budget as a line item. In addition, Grantees may not provide
direct cash transfers to communities, parents, or children. The funding
for this program does not include authority for sub-grants and, as a
matter of policy, USDOL does not allow for direct cash transfers to
target beneficiaries. USDOL, however, would support the purchase of
incidental items in the nature of ``participant support costs'' under
OMB Circular A-122, Attachment B, No. 34, which are necessary to ensure
that target children have access to schooling. These participant
support costs may include such items as uniforms and school supplies,
and the provision of tuition and transportation costs in the form of
vouchers to the provider of services. If an applicant proposes the
provision of participant support costs, the applicant must specify: (1)
Why these activities and interventions are necessary, and how they will
contribute to the overall project goals; and (2) how will the
disbursement of funds be administered in order to maximize efficiency
and minimize the risk of misuse. The applicant must also address how
participant support costs being funded by the project will be made
sustainable once the project is completed.
If proposed participant support costs are approved by USDOL, these
items must be purchased or paid for directly by the Grantee or its sub-
contractor(s), as opposed to handing cash directly to children or other
individuals.
ii. Under these cooperative agreements, awareness raising and
advocacy activities cannot include fund-raising or lobbying of the U.
S. Federal, State or Local Governments (see OMB Circular A-122).
iii. In accordance with OMB Circular A-122, funds awarded under
this cooperative agreement may be used to cover the costs of meetings
and conferences, as long as the primary purpose of such an event is the
dissemination of technical information. These costs include meals,
transportation, rental of facilities, speakers' fees, and other items
incidental to such meetings or conference.
iv. USDOL funds awarded under this solicitation are not intended to
duplicate or substitute for host country government efforts or
resources intended for child labor or education programs. Thus,
Grantees may not provide any of the funds awarded under this
cooperative agreement to foreign government entities, ministries,
officials, or political parties. However, sub-contracts with foreign
government agencies may be awarded to provide direct services or
undertake project activities subject to applicable laws and only after
a competitive procurement process has been conducted and no other
entity in the country is able to provide these services. The Grantee
must receive prior USDOL approval before sub-contracting the provision
of direct services to foreign government agencies.
v. Applicants are reminded that U.S. Executive Orders and U.S. law
prohibit transactions with, and the provision of resources and support
to, individuals and organizations associated with terrorism. It is the
legal responsibility of the Grantee to ensure compliance with these
Executive Orders and laws. This provision must be included in all sub-
contracts issued under the cooperative agreement.
vi. The U.S. Government is opposed to prostitution and related
activities, which are inherently harmful and dehumanizing, and
contribute to the phenomenon of trafficking in persons. U.S. non-
governmental organizations, and their sub-contractors, cannot use U.S.
Government funds to lobby for, promote or advocate the legalization or
regulation of prostitution as a legitimate form of work. Foreign non-
governmental organizations, and their sub-contractors, that receive
U.S. Government funds to fight trafficking in persons cannot lobby for,
promote or advocate the legalization
[[Page 36956]]
or regulation of prostitution as a legitimate form of work. It is the
responsibility of the Grantee to ensure its sub-contractors meet these
criteria. (The U.S. Government is currently developing language to
specifically address Public International Organizations' implementation
of the above anti-prostitution prohibition. If a project under this
solicitation is awarded to such an organization, appropriate substitute
language for the above prohibition will be included in the project's
cooperative agreement.)
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lisa Harvey. E-mail address:
harvey.lisa@dol.gov. For a list of frequently asked questions on
USDOL's Child Labor Education Initiative Solicitation for Cooperative
Agreement, please visit https://www.dol.gov/ILAB/faq/faq36.htm.
V. Application Review Information
1. Application Evaluation Criteria
Technical panels will review applications written in the specified
format (see Section I, Section IV(2) and Appendix A) against the
various criteria on the basis of 100 points. Up to five additional
points will be given for the inclusion of non-Federal leveraged
resources as described below in Section V(1)(D). Applicants are
requested to prepare their technical proposal (45 page maximum)
organized in accordance with Appendix A, and address all of the
following rating factors, which are presented in the order of emphasis
that they will receive, and the maximum rating points for each factor.
Program Design/Budget-Cost Effectiveness: 45 points.
Organizational Capacity: 30 points.
Management Plan/Key Personnel/Staffing: 25 points.
Leveraging Resources: 5 extra points.
A. Project/Program Design/Budget-Cost Effectiveness (45 points)
This part of the application constitutes the preliminary project
design document described in Section VI(3)(A), and outlined in Appendix
A. The applicant's proposal must describe in detail the proposed
approach to comply with each requirement. Applicants will be rated
based on their understanding of the child labor and education context
in the host country, as well as on the clarity and quality of
information provided in the project design document.
This component of the application must demonstrate the applicant's
thorough knowledge and understanding of the issues, barriers, and
challenges involved in providing education to children engaging in or
at risk of engaging in exploitive child labor, particularly its worst
forms; best-practice solutions to address their needs; and the policy
and implementing environment in the selected country. When preparing
the technical proposal, the applicant must follow the outline provided
in Appendix A, and at minimum include a description of:
i. Children Targeted--The applicant must identify which and how
many children are expected to receive direct and indirect services from
the project, including the sectors in which they work, geographical
location, and other relevant characteristics. Please refer to Section
I(2) for USDOL's definition of educational services and training
opportunities for children targeted under this solicitation.
Children are defined as persons under the age of 18 who have been
engaged or at risk of engaging in the worst forms of child labor as
defined by ILO Convention 182, or those under the legal working age of
the country and who are engaged or at risk of engaging in other
hazardous and/or exploitive activities. Under this solicitation, at-
risk children are defined as siblings of working children, or children
living in areas with a high incidence of exploitive child labor.
ii. Needs/Gaps/Barriers--The applicant must describe the specific
gaps/educational needs of the children targeted that the project will
address.
Note: The number of children targeted by the project must be
commensurate with the need in the geographical area or sector where
the project will be implemented. In addition, the budget proposed
should take into account the type of work in which the target
children are currently engaged, and the cost of removing the child
from that sector.
iii. Proposed Strategy--The applicant must discuss the proposed
strategy to address gaps/needs/barriers of the children targeted and
its rationale. Applicants will be rated based on the quality and
pertinence of proposed strategies. Please refer to Section I(2) for
USDOL's definition of educational services and training opportunities
for children targeted under this solicitation.
iv. Sustainability Plan--The applicant must discuss a proposed plan
for sustainability of project efforts. To USDOL, sustainability is
linked to project impact and the ability of individuals, communities,
and a nation to ensure that the activities or changes implemented by a
project endure. A project's impact is manifested at the level of
individuals, organizations, and systems. For individual children and
their families this would mean a positive and enduring change in their
life conditions as a result of project interventions. At the level of
organizations and systems, sustained impact would involve continued
commitment and ability (including financial commitment and policy
change) by project partners to continue the actions generated by the
project, including enforcement of existing policies that target child
labor and school attendance. Applicants will be rated based on the
pertinence and appropriateness of the proposed sustainability plan.
v. Description of Activities--The applicant must provide a detailed
description of proposed activities that relate to the gaps/needs/
barriers to be addressed, including training and technical assistance
to be provided to project staff, host country nationals and community
groups involved in the project. The proposed approach is expected to
build upon existing activities, government policies, and plans, and
avoid needless duplication. Please refer to Section I(2) for USDOL's
definition of educational services and training opportunities for
children targeted under this solicitation.
vi. Work Plan--The applicant must provide a detailed work plan and
timeline for the proposed project, preferably with a visual such as a
Gantt chart. Applicants will be rated based on the clarity and quality
of the information provided in the work plan.
Note: Applicants are also encouraged to enroll one-quarter of
the targeted children in educational activities during the first
year of project implementation.
vii. Program Management and Performance Assessment--The applicant
must describe: (1) How management will ensure that the goals and
objectives will be met; (2) how information and data will be collected
and used to demonstrate the impacts of the project; and (3) what
systems will be put in place for self-assessment, evaluation, and
continuous improvement. Note to All Applicants: USDOL has already
developed common indicators (enrollment, retention, and completion) and
a database system for monitoring children's educational progress that
can be used and adapted by Grantees after award. Grantees will be
responsible for entering information on each project beneficiary into
this database system. Further guidance on common indicators will be
provided after award, thus applicants should focus their program
management and performance assessment responses toward the development
of their project's monitoring strategy in support
[[Page 36957]]
of the delivery of direct education and training opportunities to
working children and those at risk of engaging in exploitive work, and
the four goals of the Child Labor Education Initiative set out in
Section I(1)(A). Because of the potentially significant links between
hours worked, working conditions, and school performance, Grantees are
encouraged to collect information to track this correlation among
project beneficiaries. Applicants proposing innovative methodologies in
this area will be rated more highly.
Please note: In addition to reporting on the common indicators,
applicants will be expected to track the working status, conditions,
and hours of targeted children, including the withdrawal of children
from exploitive/hazardous working conditions. Applicants are also
expected to explore cost-effective ways of assessing the impact of
proposed services/interventions to indirect beneficiaries.
Applicants are expected to budget for costs associated with
collecting and reporting on the common indicators (enrollment,
retention, and completion), data management, tracking the working
status children, and assessing the impact of services/interventions to
indirect beneficiaries.
viii. Budget/Cost Effectiveness--The applicant must show how the
budget reflects program goals and design in a cost-effective way to
reflect budget/performance integration. The budget must be linked to
the activities and outputs of the implementation plan listed above. The
budget proposed should also take into account the type of work in which
the target children are currently engaged.
This section of the application must explain the costs for
performing all of the requirements presented in this solicitation, and
for producing all required reports and other deliverables. Costs must
include labor; equipment; travel; annual single audits or attestation
engagements (as applicable); midterm and final evaluations; and other
related costs. Applications are expected to allocate sufficient
resources to proposed studies, assessments, surveys, and monitoring and
evaluation activities, including costs associated with collecting
information for and reporting on the common indicators. In addition,
the budget should include a contingency provision, calculated at 5% of
the project's total direct costs, for unexpected expenses essential to
meeting project goals, such as host country currency devaluations,
security costs, etc. USDOL will not provide additional funding to cover
unanticipated costs. Grantees must obtain prior approval from USDOL
before using contingency funds. If these funds have not been exhausted
toward the end of the project period, USDOL and the Grantee will
determine whether it is appropriate to reallocate the funds to direct
educational or training services or return the funds to USDOL.
Grantees should also budget for a facilitator-led project launch
meeting in the target country, which will allow key stakeholders to
discuss issues of project design and monitoring.
When developing their applications, applicants are also expected to
allocate the largest proportion of resources to educational activities
aimed at targeted children, rather than direct and/or indirect
administrative costs. Higher ratings will be given to applicants with
low administrative costs and with a budget breakdown that provides a
larger amount of resources to project activities. All projected costs
should be reported, as they will become part of the cooperative
agreement upon award. In their cost proposal (Part I of the
application), applicants must reflect a breakdown of the total
administrative costs into direct administrative costs and indirect
administrative costs. This section will be evaluated in accordance with
applicable Federal laws and regulations. The budget must comply with
Federal cost principles (which can be found in the applicable OMB
Circulars). An example of an Output Based Budget has been provided as
Annex B.
Applicants are encouraged to discuss the possibility of exemption
from customs and Value Added Tax (VAT) with host government officials
during the preparation of an application for this cooperative
agreement. While USDOL encourages host governments to not apply custom
or VAT taxes to USDOL-funded programs, some host governments may
nevertheless choose to assess such taxes. USDOL may not be able to
provide assistance in this regard. Applicants should take into account
such costs in budget preparation. If major costs are omitted, a Grantee
may not be allowed to include them later.
B. Organizational Capacity (30 points)
Under this criterion, the applicant must present the qualifications
of the organization(s) implementing the program/project. The evaluation
criteria in this category are as follows:
i. International Experience--The organization applying for the
award has international experience implementing basic, transitional,
non-formal, or vocational education programs that address issues of
access, quality, and policy reform for vulnerable children including
children engaging in or at risk of engaging in exploitive child labor,
preferably in the country of interest.
ii. Country Presence--Given the need to provide children engaged in
the worst forms of child labor with immediate assistance in accessing
educational and training opportunities, applicants will be evaluated on
their ability to start up project activities soon after signing a
cooperative agreement. Having country presence, or partnering with in-
country organizations, presents the best chance of expediting the
delivery of services to children engaging in or at risk of engaging in
the worst forms of child labor. In their application, applicants must
address country presence; outreach to government and non-governmental
organizations, including local and community-based organizations; and
the ability of the organization to start up project activities in a
timely fashion. Applicants may submit supporting documentation with
their application demonstrating country presence and/or outreach to
host government ministries and non-governmental organizations in the
country. These attachments will not count toward the page limit.
Within 60 days of award, an applicant, or its partners, must be
formally recognized by the host government(s) using the appropriate
mechanism, e.g., Memorandum of Understanding or local registration of
the organization. An applicant must demonstra