Block Corporation; Amory, MS; Notice of Negative Determination Regarding Application for Reconsideration, 35455 [E5-3168]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 117 / Monday, June 20, 2005 / Notices
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
[TA–W–57,078]
Allied Bias Products; Jersey City, NJ;
Notice of Termination of Investigation
Pursuant to section 221 of the Trade
Act of 1974, as amended, an
investigation was initiated on April 29,
2005, in response to a petition filed by
a state agency representative on behalf
of workers at Allied Bias Products,
Jersey City, New Jersey.
The petitioner has requested that the
petition be withdrawn. Consequently,
further investigation would serve no
purpose the investigation has been
terminated.
Signed at Washington, DC, this 2nd day of
June, 2005.
Linda G. Poole,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade
Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E5–3171 Filed 6–17–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–30–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Conclusion
Employment and Training
Administration
[TA–W–56,871]
Block Corporation; Amory, MS; Notice
of Negative Determination Regarding
Application for Reconsideration
By application of May 16, 2005 a
petitioner requested administrative
reconsideration of the Department’s
negative determination regarding
eligibility for workers and former
workers of the subject firm to apply for
Trade Adjustment Assistance (TAA) and
Alternative Trade Adjustment
Assistance (ATAA). The denial notice
was signed on April 27, 2005 and
published in the Federal Register on
May 16, 2005 (70 FR 25859).
Pursuant to 29 CFR 90.18(c)
reconsideration may be granted under
the following circumstances:
(1) If it appears on the basis of facts
not previously considered that the
determination complained of was
erroneous;
(2) If it appears that the determination
complained of was based on a mistake
in the determination of facts not
previously considered; or
(3) If in the opinion of the Certifying
Officer, a misinterpretation of facts or of
the law justified reconsideration of the
decision.
The TAA petition, filed on behalf of
workers at Block Corporation, Amory,
VerDate jul<14>2003
17:24 Jun 17, 2005
Mississippi engaged in production of
men’s trouser samples was denied
because the ‘‘contributed importantly’’
group eligibility requirement of section
222 of the Trade Act of 1974 was not
met, nor was there a shift in production
from that firm to a foreign country. The
investigation revealed that the
preponderance in employment declines
is attributed to a domestic shift in
production of men’s trouser samples.
In the request for reconsideration, the
petitioner alleges that the layoffs at the
subject firm are attributable to an
increase in imports of men’s trouser
samples.
A company official was contacted
regarding the above allegations. The
company official confirmed what was
revealed during the initial investigation.
In particular, the official stated that
even though the subject firm has been
importing a small portion of men’s
trouser samples, domestic production of
men’s trouser samples have not
declined during the relevant time
period. Furthermore, the official stated
that the same amount of pant samples
that were produced at the subject
facility are now produced at another
domestic facility.
Jkt 205001
After review of the application and
investigative findings, I conclude that
there has been no error or
misinterpretation of the law or of the
facts which would justify
reconsideration of the Department of
Labor’s prior decision. Accordingly, the
application is denied.
Signed at Washington, DC, this 7th day of
June, 2005.
Elliott S. Kushner,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade
Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E5–3168 Filed 6–17–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–30–P
U.S. Headquarters, a subsidiary of Creo,
Inc., New York, New York.
The petitioning group of workers is
covered by an active certification, (TA–
W–55,607A) which expires on April 5,
2007. Consequently, further
investigation in this case would serve
no purpose, and the investigation has
been terminated.
Signed at Washington, DC this 1st day of
June 2005.
Elliott S. Kushner,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade
Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E5–3173 Filed 6–17–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–30–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
[TA–W–56,674]
CTS Corporation; CTS
Communications Components, Inc.,
Including On-Site Leased Workers of
Excel and Spherion Albuquerque, New
Mexico; Dismissal of Application for
Reconsideration
Pursuant to 29 CFR 90.18(C) an
application for administrative
reconsideration was filed with the
Director of the Division of Trade
Adjustment Assistance for workers at
CTS Corporation, CTS Communications
Components, Inc., including on-site
leased workers of Excel and Spherion,
Albuquerque, New Mexico. The
application contained no new
substantial information which would
bear importantly on the Department’s
determination. Therefore, dismissal of
the application was issued.
TA–W–56,674; CTS Corporation, CTS
Communications Components, Inc.,
Including On-Site Leased Workers of
Excel and Spherion, Albuquerque, New
Mexico (June 7, 2005).
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
[TA–W–57,158]
Creo Americas, Inc., U.S.
Headquarters, a Subsidiary of Creo,
Inc.; Billerica, MA; Located in New
York, NY; Notice of Termination of
Investigation
Signed at Washington, DC, this 8th day of
June 2005.
Timothy Sullivan,
Director, Division of Trade Adjustment
Assistance.
[FR Doc. E5–3165 Filed 6–17–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–30–P
Pursuant to section 221 of the Trade
Act of 1974, as amended, an
investigation was initiated on May 12,
2005 in response to a worker petition
filed by a State agency representative on
behalf of workers at Creo Americas, Inc.,
PO 00000
Frm 00063
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
35455
E:\FR\FM\20JNN1.SGM
20JNN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 117 (Monday, June 20, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 35455]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E5-3168]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training Administration
[TA-W-56,871]
Block Corporation; Amory, MS; Notice of Negative Determination
Regarding Application for Reconsideration
By application of May 16, 2005 a petitioner requested
administrative reconsideration of the Department's negative
determination regarding eligibility for workers and former workers of
the subject firm to apply for Trade Adjustment Assistance (TAA) and
Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance (ATAA). The denial notice was
signed on April 27, 2005 and published in the Federal Register on May
16, 2005 (70 FR 25859).
Pursuant to 29 CFR 90.18(c) reconsideration may be granted under
the following circumstances:
(1) If it appears on the basis of facts not previously considered
that the determination complained of was erroneous;
(2) If it appears that the determination complained of was based on
a mistake in the determination of facts not previously considered; or
(3) If in the opinion of the Certifying Officer, a
misinterpretation of facts or of the law justified reconsideration of
the decision.
The TAA petition, filed on behalf of workers at Block Corporation,
Amory, Mississippi engaged in production of men's trouser samples was
denied because the ``contributed importantly'' group eligibility
requirement of section 222 of the Trade Act of 1974 was not met, nor
was there a shift in production from that firm to a foreign country.
The investigation revealed that the preponderance in employment
declines is attributed to a domestic shift in production of men's
trouser samples.
In the request for reconsideration, the petitioner alleges that the
layoffs at the subject firm are attributable to an increase in imports
of men's trouser samples.
A company official was contacted regarding the above allegations.
The company official confirmed what was revealed during the initial
investigation. In particular, the official stated that even though the
subject firm has been importing a small portion of men's trouser
samples, domestic production of men's trouser samples have not declined
during the relevant time period. Furthermore, the official stated that
the same amount of pant samples that were produced at the subject
facility are now produced at another domestic facility.
Conclusion
After review of the application and investigative findings, I
conclude that there has been no error or misinterpretation of the law
or of the facts which would justify reconsideration of the Department
of Labor's prior decision. Accordingly, the application is denied.
Signed at Washington, DC, this 7th day of June, 2005.
Elliott S. Kushner,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E5-3168 Filed 6-17-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-P
