Philips Lighting Company, a Subsidiary of Royal Philips Electronics, Paris, TX; Notice of Revised Determination of Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance on Remand, 35456-35457 [E5-3164]
Download as PDF
35456
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 117 / Monday, June 20, 2005 / Notices
Conclusion
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
Employment and Training
Administration
[TA–W–57,090]
[TA–W–56,842]
Hewlett-Packard Company, Imaging &
Printing Group—Technology Platforms
Division; Corvallis, Oregon; Notice of
Termination of Investigation
KUS, Inc., a/k/a Karl Schmidt Unisia,
Inc.; Fort Wayne, IN; Dismissal of
Application for Reconsideration
Pursuant to section 221 of the Trade
Act of 1974, an investigation was
initiated on May 3, 2005 in response to
a worker petition which was filed on
behalf of workers at Hewlett-Packard
Company, Imaging & Printing Group—
Technology Platforms Division,
Corvallis, Oregon.
The petitioning group of workers is
covered by an active certification, (TA–
W–56,696) which expires on May 7,
2007. Consequently, further
investigation in this case would serve
no purpose, and the investigation has
been terminated.
Signed in Washington, DC, this 2nd day of
June, 2005.
Elliott S. Kushner,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade
Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E5–3172 Filed 6–17–05; 8:45 am]
Pursuant to 29 CFR 90.18(C) an
application for administrative
reconsideration was filed with the
Director of the Division of Trade
Adjustment Assistance for workers at
KUS, Inc., a/k/a Karl Schmidt Unisia,
Inc., Fort Wayne, Indiana. The
application contained no new
substantial information which would
bear importantly on the Department’s
determination. Therefore, dismissal of
the application was issued.
TA–W–56,842; KUS, Inc., a/k/a Karl Schmidt
Unisia, Inc., Fort Wayne, Indiana (June 7,
2005).
Signed at Washington, DC, this 8th day of
June 2005.
Timothy Sullivan,
Director, Division of Trade Adjustment
Assistance.
[FR Doc. E5–3167 Filed 6–17–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–30–P
BILLING CODE 4510–30–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
Employment and Training
Administration
[TA–W–56,688]
[TA–W–57,040]
Higgins Seaming; Rainsville, AL;
Notice of Termination of Investigation
Pursuant to section 221 of the Trade
Act of 1974, an investigation was
initiated on April 25, 2005 in response
to petition filed on behalf of workers at
Higgins Seaming, Rainsville, Alabama.
The petition regarding the
investigation has been deemed invalid.
Consequently, the investigation has
been terminated.
Signed in Washington, DC, this 1st day of
June, 2005.
Elliott S. Kushner,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade
Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E5–3170 Filed 6–17–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–30–P
VerDate jul<14>2003
17:24 Jun 17, 2005
Jkt 205001
Lands’ End, a Subsidiary of Sears
Roebuck and Company, Business
Outfitters Cad Operations, Dodgeville,
WI; Notice of Affirmative Determination
Regarding Application for
Reconsideration
By application of April 24, 2005,
petitioners requested administrative
reconsideration of the Department’s
negative determination regarding
eligibility for workers and former
workers of the subject firm to apply for
Trade Adjustment Assistance (TAA) and
Alternative Trade Adjustment
Assistance (ATAA). The determination
was signed on March 25, 2005 and the
Notice of determination was published
in the Federal Register on May 2, 2005
(70 FR 22710).
The Department carefully reviewed
the petitioners’ request for
reconsideration and has determined that
the Department will conduct further
investigation based on new information
provided.
PO 00000
Frm 00064
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
After careful review of the
application, I conclude that the claim is
of sufficient weight to justify
reconsideration of the Department of
Labor’s prior decision. The application
is, therefore, granted.
Signed at Washington, DC, this 6th day of
June 2005.
Elliott S. Kushner,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade
Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E5–3166 Filed 6–17–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–30–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
[TA–W–55,574]
Philips Lighting Company, a
Subsidiary of Royal Philips
Electronics, Paris, TX; Notice of
Revised Determination of Alternative
Trade Adjustment Assistance on
Remand
On March 9, 2005, the U.S. Court of
International Trade (USCIT) granted the
Department of Labor’s motion for a
voluntary remand in Former Employees
of Philips Lighting Company v. United
States Secretary of Labor, Court No. 04–
00651.
On September 29, 2004, the
Department issued a determination for
the September 2, 2004 petition filed on
behalf of workers at the subject
company. The workers were certified as
eligible to apply for Trade Adjustment
Assistance (TAA) and ineligible to
apply for Alternative Trade Adjustment
Assistance (ATAA). The Notice of
determination was published in the
Federal Register on October 26, 2004
(69 FR 62462).
By letter dated December 19, 2004,
the International Brotherhood of
Electrical Workers, Local 1794,
appealed to the USCIT for
administrative reconsideration of the
Department’s negative determination
regarding the subject worker group’s
eligibility to apply for ATAA and
requested an extension of the
certification period to include workers
who were separated prior to September
2, 2003 (one year prior to the petition
date).
Pursuant to the USCIT’s March 9,
2005 order, the Department has
conducted an investigation on remand
to determine the workers’ eligibility to
apply for ATAA certification.
The group eligibility certification
criteria for the ATAA program under
E:\FR\FM\20JNN1.SGM
20JNN1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 117 / Monday, June 20, 2005 / Notices
section 246 the Trade Act of 1974, as
amended, established that the
Department must determine whether a
significant number of workers in the
workers’ firm are 50 years of age or
older, whether the workers in the
workers’ firm possess skills that are not
easily transferable, and whether the
competitive conditions within the
workers’ industry are adverse.
During the initial determination, the
Department determined that at least five
percent of the workforce at the subject
firm is at least fifty years of age, that
workers of the subject firm possess
skills that are easily transferable, and
that competitive conditions within the
industry are adverse.
During the remand investigation, the
Department obtained new information,
including information that shows that
the average salary level of workers with
similar skills as the worker group
declined significantly during the
investigatory period, that manufacturing
employment opportunities within a 120mile radius of the subject firm are
scarce, and that existing manufacturing
companies in the county which the
subject company is located are not
seeking hiring workers with those skills
which are possessed by the subject
worker group.
The Department cannot grant the
petitioner’s request to extend the
certification period to include workers
who were separated prior to September
2, 2003 because the applicable
regulation, 29 CFR 90.16(e)(1), states
that exclusions from coverage of a
certification of eligibility include any
worker whose last total or partial
separation from the subject firm
occurred more than one year before the
date of the petition.
Conclusion
After careful review of the facts, I
conclude that the requirements of
section 246 of the Trade Act of 1974, as
amended, have been met for workers at
the subject firm. In accordance with the
provisions of the Act, I make the
following certification:
All workers of Philips Lighting Company, A
Subsidiary of Royal Philips Electronics,
Paris, Texas, who became totally or partially
separated from employment on or after
September 2, 2003 through September 29,
2006, are eligible to apply for adjustment
assistance under section 223 of the Trade Act
of 1974, and are also eligible to apply for
alternative trade adjustment assistance under
section 246 of the Trade Act of 1974.
VerDate jul<14>2003
17:24 Jun 17, 2005
Jkt 205001
35457
Signed at Washington, DC, this 7th day of
June 2005.
Elliott S. Kushner,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade
Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E5–3164 Filed 6–17–05; 8:45 am]
I further determine that all workers of
Pilling/Weck, a subsidiary of Teleflex,
including on-site leased workers of Aerotek
and Acsys, Horsham, Pennsylvania are
denied eligibility to apply for alternative
trade adjustment assistance under section
246 of the Trade Act of 1974.’’
BILLING CODE 4510–30–P
Signed at Washington, DC this 7th day of
June 2005.
Richard Church,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade
Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E5–3169 Filed 6–17–05; 8:45 am]
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
BILLING CODE 4510–30–P
[TA–W–57,031]
Pilling/Weck, a Subsidiary of Teleflex,
Including On-Site Leased Workers of
Aerotek and Acsys; Horsham, PA;
Amended Certification Regarding
Eligibility To Apply for Worker
Adjustment Assistance and Negative
Determination Regarding Eligibility To
Apply for Alternative Trade Adjustment
Assistance
In accordance with section 223 of the
Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2273) the
Department of Labor issued a
Certification of Eligibility to Apply for
Worker Adjustment Assistance and a
Negative Determination Regarding
Eligibility to Apply for Alternative
Trade Adjustment Assistance on May
26, 2005, applicable to workers of
Pilling/Weck, a subsidiary of Teleflex,
including on-site leased workers of
Aerotek, Horsham, Pennsylvania. The
notice will be published soon in the
Federal Register.
At the request of the State agency, the
Department reviewed the certification
for workers of the subject firm. New
information shows that leased workers
of Acsys were employed on-site at the
Horsham, Pennsylvania location of
Pilling/Weck, a subsidiary of Teleflex.
Based on these findings, the
Department is amending this
certification to include leased workers
of Acsys working at Pilling/Weck, a
subsidiary of Teleflex, Horsham,
Pennsylvania.
The intent of the Department’s
certification is to include all workers
employed at Pilling/Weck, a subsidiary
of Teleflex who were adversely affected
by a shift in production to South Korea,
Pakistan and Germany.
The amended notice applicable to
TA–W–57,031 is hereby issued as
follows:
‘‘All workers of Pilling/Weck, a subsidiary
of Teleflex, including on-site leased workers
of Aerotek and Acsys, Horsham,
Pennsylvania who became totally or partially
separated from employment on or after April
20, 2004, through May 26, 2007, are eligible
to apply for adjustment assistance under
section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974.
PO 00000
Frm 00065
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
MORRIS K. UDALL SCHOLARSHIP
AND EXCELLENCE IN NATIONAL
ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY
FOUNDATION
The United States Institute for
Environmental Conflict Resolution;
Agency Information Collection
Activities; Extension of Currently
Approved Information Collection;
Comment Request
Morris K. Udall Scholarship
and Excellence in National
Environmental Policy Foundation, U.S.
Institute for Environmental Conflict
Resolution
ACTION: Notice; U.S. Institute for
Environmental Conflict Resolution
application for the National Roster of
Environmental Dispute Resolution and
Consensus Building Professionals.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: In compliance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act and
supporting regulations, this document
announces that the U.S. Institute for
Environmental Conflict Resolution (the
Institute), part of the Morris K. Udall
Foundation, is planning to submit to the
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) a request for an extension for the
currently approved information
collection (ICR), OMB control Number
3320–0008: Application for the National
Roster of Environmental Dispute
Resolution and Consensus Building
Professionals (‘‘National Roster of ECR
Practitioners’’ or ‘‘roster’’), currently
operating pursuant to OMB clearance
issued October 17, 2002 and which
expires October 31, 2005. Before
submitting the extension to OMB for
review and approval, the Institute is
soliciting comments regarding the
information collection (see section C.
below entitled ‘‘Questions to Consider
in Making Comments’’). This document
provides information on the continuing
need for the Roster of ECR Practitioners
Application and the information
recorded in the application.
E:\FR\FM\20JNN1.SGM
20JNN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 117 (Monday, June 20, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 35456-35457]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E5-3164]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training Administration
[TA-W-55,574]
Philips Lighting Company, a Subsidiary of Royal Philips
Electronics, Paris, TX; Notice of Revised Determination of Alternative
Trade Adjustment Assistance on Remand
On March 9, 2005, the U.S. Court of International Trade (USCIT)
granted the Department of Labor's motion for a voluntary remand in
Former Employees of Philips Lighting Company v. United States Secretary
of Labor, Court No. 04-00651.
On September 29, 2004, the Department issued a determination for
the September 2, 2004 petition filed on behalf of workers at the
subject company. The workers were certified as eligible to apply for
Trade Adjustment Assistance (TAA) and ineligible to apply for
Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance (ATAA). The Notice of
determination was published in the Federal Register on October 26, 2004
(69 FR 62462).
By letter dated December 19, 2004, the International Brotherhood of
Electrical Workers, Local 1794, appealed to the USCIT for
administrative reconsideration of the Department's negative
determination regarding the subject worker group's eligibility to apply
for ATAA and requested an extension of the certification period to
include workers who were separated prior to September 2, 2003 (one year
prior to the petition date).
Pursuant to the USCIT's March 9, 2005 order, the Department has
conducted an investigation on remand to determine the workers'
eligibility to apply for ATAA certification.
The group eligibility certification criteria for the ATAA program
under
[[Page 35457]]
section 246 the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, established that the
Department must determine whether a significant number of workers in
the workers' firm are 50 years of age or older, whether the workers in
the workers' firm possess skills that are not easily transferable, and
whether the competitive conditions within the workers' industry are
adverse.
During the initial determination, the Department determined that at
least five percent of the workforce at the subject firm is at least
fifty years of age, that workers of the subject firm possess skills
that are easily transferable, and that competitive conditions within
the industry are adverse.
During the remand investigation, the Department obtained new
information, including information that shows that the average salary
level of workers with similar skills as the worker group declined
significantly during the investigatory period, that manufacturing
employment opportunities within a 120-mile radius of the subject firm
are scarce, and that existing manufacturing companies in the county
which the subject company is located are not seeking hiring workers
with those skills which are possessed by the subject worker group.
The Department cannot grant the petitioner's request to extend the
certification period to include workers who were separated prior to
September 2, 2003 because the applicable regulation, 29 CFR
90.16(e)(1), states that exclusions from coverage of a certification of
eligibility include any worker whose last total or partial separation
from the subject firm occurred more than one year before the date of
the petition.
Conclusion
After careful review of the facts, I conclude that the requirements
of section 246 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, have been met for
workers at the subject firm. In accordance with the provisions of the
Act, I make the following certification:
All workers of Philips Lighting Company, A Subsidiary of Royal
Philips Electronics, Paris, Texas, who became totally or partially
separated from employment on or after September 2, 2003 through
September 29, 2006, are eligible to apply for adjustment assistance
under section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, and are also eligible to
apply for alternative trade adjustment assistance under section 246
of the Trade Act of 1974.
Signed at Washington, DC, this 7th day of June 2005.
Elliott S. Kushner,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E5-3164 Filed 6-17-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-P