In the Matter of Certain DVD/CD Players and Recorders, Color Television Receivers and Monitors, and Components Thereof; Notice of Investigation, 35453-35454 [05-12037]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 117 / Monday, June 20, 2005 / Notices • The second element of the Yuba Accord would be an agreement between YCWA and water districts within Yuba County (Yuba Accord Conjunctive Use Agreement) for the implementation of a comprehensive program of conjunctive use of surface water and groundwater supplies and actions to improve water use efficiencies. • The third element would be an agreement between YCWA and the California Department of Water Resources (DWR) and Reclamation (Yuba Accord Transfer Agreement), which would put water released from the Yuba Project to beneficial uses through the Environmental Water Account and in the CVP and SWP service areas. All three of these agreements would need to be in place for the Yuba Accord to be implemented. The draft EIS/EIR will analyze the adverse and beneficial effects of implementing the Yuba Accord on surface water hydrology, groundwater hydrology, water supply, hydropower, flood control, water quality, fisheries, wildlife, vegetation, special-status species, recreation, visual, cultural and Indian Trust Assets, air quality, land use, socioeconomic, growth inducement, and environmental justice resources and conditions. Alternatives to be evaluated in the draft EIS/EIR include the No Action Alternative, Proposed Action Alternative, and others as appropriate. In addition, the draft EIS/EIR will address the cumulative impacts of implementation of the Yuba Accord in conjunction with other past, present, and reasonably foreseeable actions. Our practice is to make comments on a Notice of Intent, including names and home addresses of respondents, available for public review. Individual respondents may request that we withhold their home addresses from public disclosure, which we will honor to the extent allowable by law. There also may be circumstances in which we would withhold a respondent’s identity from public disclosure, as allowable by law. If you wish us to withhold your name and/or address, you must state this prominently at the beginning of your comment. We will make all submissions from organizations or businesses, and from individuals identifying themselves as representatives or officials of organizations or businesses, available for public disclosure in their entirety. VerDate jul<14>2003 17:24 Jun 17, 2005 Jkt 205001 Dated: June 10, 2005. Frank Michny, Regional Environmental Officer, Mid-Pacific Region. [FR Doc. 05–11975 Filed 6–17–05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4310–MN–P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Inv. No. 337–TA–542] In the Matter of Certain DVD/CD Players and Recorders, Color Television Receivers and Monitors, and Components Thereof; Notice of Investigation U.S. International Trade Commission. ACTION: Institution of investigation pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 1337. AGENCY: SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that a complaint was filed with the U.S. International Trade Commission on May 17, 2005, under section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, on behalf of BenQ Corporation of Taiwan and BenQ America Corporation of Irvine, California. The complaint alleges violations of section 337 in the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, and the sale within the United States after importation of certain DVD/CD players and recorders, color television receivers and monitors, and components thereof, by reason of infringement of claims 7–11 and 13–15 of U.S. Patent No. 5,270,821 and claims 1, 2, 4, and 5 of U.S. Patent No. 6,683,842. The complaint further alleges that an industry in the United States exists as required by subsection (a)(3) of section 337. The complainants request that the Commission institute an investigation and, after the investigation, issue an exclusion order and a cease and desist order. ADDRESSES: The complaint, except for any confidential information contained therein, is available for inspection during official business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Room 112, Washington, DC 20436, telephone 202–205–2000. Hearing impaired individuals are advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202–205–1810. Persons with mobility impairment who will need special assistance in gaining access to the Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at 202–205–2000. General information concerning the PO 00000 Frm 00061 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 35453 Commission may be obtained by accessing its Internet server (https:// www.usitc.gov). The public record for this investigation may be reviewed on the Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jay H. Reiziss, Esq., Office of Unfair Import Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, telephone 202–205–2579. Authority: The authority for institution of this investigation is contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and in section 210.10 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedures, 19 CFR 210.10(2004). Scope of Investigation: Having considered the complaint, the U.S. International Trade Commission, on June 13, 2005, ordered that— (1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, an investigation be instituted to determine whether there is a violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of section 337 in the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, or the sale within the United States after importation of certain DVD/CD players or recorders, color television receivers or monitors, or components thereof, by reason of infringement of one or more of claims 7–11 and 13–15 of U.S. Patent No. 5,270,821, or claims 1, 2, 4, or 5 of U.S. Patent No. 6,683,842, and whether an industry in the United States exists as required by subsection (a)(3) of section 337. (2) For the purpose of the investigation so instituted, the following are hereby named as parties upon which this notice of investigation shall be served: (a) The complainants are— BenQ Corporation, 157 Shan-Ying Rd, Gueishan, Taoyuan 333, Taiwan. BenQ Corporation, 53 Discovery, Irvine, California 92618. (b) The respondent is the following company alleged to be in violation of section 337, and is the party upon which the complaint is to be served: Thomson Inc., 10330 N. Meridian Street, Indianapolis, IN 46290–1024. (c) Jay H. Reiziss, Esq., Office of Unfair Import Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Suite 401, Washington, DC 20436, who shall be the Commission investigative attorney, party to this investigation; and For the investigation so instituted, the Honorable Robert L. Barton, Jr. is designated as the presiding administrative law judge. A response to the complaint and the notice of investigation must be E:\FR\FM\20JNN1.SGM 20JNN1 35454 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 117 / Monday, June 20, 2005 / Notices submitted by the named respondent in accordance with section 210.13 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13. Pursuant to 19 CFR 201.16(d) and 210.13(a), such response will be considered by the Commission if received no later than 20 days after the date of service by the Commission of the complaint and the notice of investigation. Extensions of time for submitting the response to the complaint will not be granted unless good cause therefor is shown. Failure of the respondent to file a timely response to each allegation in the complaint and in this notice may be deemed to constitute a waiver of the right to appear and contest the allegations of the complaint and to authorize the administrative law judge and the Commission, without further notice to the respondent, to find the facts to be as alleged in the complaint and this notice and to enter both an initial determination and a final determination containing such findings, and may result in the issuance of an exclusion order or cease and desist orders or both directed against the respondent. By order of the Commission. Issued: June 14, 2005. Marilyn R. Abbott, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. 05–12037 Filed 6–17–05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–M DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Antitrust Division Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993—Die Products Consortium Notice is hereby given that, on May 26, 2005, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (‘‘the Act’’), Die Products Consortium (‘‘DPC’’) has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in its membership. The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act’s provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, Infineon Technologies AG, Munich, GERMANY; and Philips Semiconductors, Inc., San Jose, CA have been added as parties to this venture. Also, National Semiconductor Corporation, Santa Clara, CA; and August Technology, Bloomington, MN have withdrawn as parties to this venture. The following member has VerDate jul<14>2003 17:24 Jun 17, 2005 Jkt 205001 changed its name: Motorola SPS to Freescale Semiconductor, Inc., Austin, TX. No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned activity of the group research project. Membership in this group research project remains open, and DPC intends to file additional written notification disclosing all changes in membership. On November 15, 1999, DPC filed its original notification pursuant to Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice in the Federal Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on June 26, 2000 (65 FR 39429). The last notification was filed with the Department on May 19, 2003. A notice was published in the Federal Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on June 10, 2003 (68 FR 34644). Dorothy B. Fountain, Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division. [FR Doc. 05–12047 Filed 6–17–05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4410–11–M DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Antitrust Division Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993—Truck Essential Power Systems Efficiency Improvements for Medium Duty Trucks Notice is hereby given that, on May 12, 2005, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (‘‘the Act’’), Truck Essential Power Systems Efficiency Improvements for Medium Duty Trucks (‘‘TEPS2’’) has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing (1) the identities of the parties to the venture and (2) the nature and objectives of the venture. The notifications were filed for the purpose of invoking the Act’s provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. Pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act, the identities of the parties to the venture are: Caterpillar Inc., Mossville, IL; Emerson Electric Co., St. Louis, MO; Engineered Machine Products, Inc., Escanaba, MI; and Dana Corporation, Ottawa Lake, MI. The general area of TEPS2’s planned activity is to focus on the optimization of sophisticated power management strategies of various electrically driven engine accessories to PO 00000 Frm 00062 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 replace the typical arrangement of belt/ gear driven components. Dorothy B. Fountain, Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division. [FR Doc. 05–12048 Filed 6–17–05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4410–11—M DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Antitrust Division Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993—Utah Health Information Network Notice is hereby given that, on June 1, 2005, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (‘‘the Act;’’), Utah Health Information Network (‘‘UHIN’’) has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing (1) the name and principal place of business of the standards development organization and (2) the nature and scope of its standards development activities. The notifications were filed for the purpose of invoking the Act’s provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. Pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act, the name and principal place of business of the standards development organization is: Utah Health Information Network, Murray, UT. The nature and scope of UHIN’s standards development activities are: to develop, maintain and promote voluntary, consensus-based interoperability standards related to the exchange of electronic healthcare data, including but not limited to, standardization of data sets, specifications, network architecture, requirements, services, methods and procedures that apply to facilities, personnel, systems, service providers, operators, and others handling healthcare information. Dorothy B. Fountain, Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division. [FR Doc. 05–12049 Filed 6–17–05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4410–11–M E:\FR\FM\20JNN1.SGM 20JNN1

Agencies

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 117 (Monday, June 20, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 35453-35454]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-12037]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Inv. No. 337-TA-542]


In the Matter of Certain DVD/CD Players and Recorders, Color 
Television Receivers and Monitors, and Components Thereof; Notice of 
Investigation

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.

ACTION: Institution of investigation pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 1337.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that a complaint was filed with the 
U.S. International Trade Commission on May 17, 2005, under section 337 
of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, on behalf of 
BenQ Corporation of Taiwan and BenQ America Corporation of Irvine, 
California. The complaint alleges violations of section 337 in the 
importation into the United States, the sale for importation, and the 
sale within the United States after importation of certain DVD/CD 
players and recorders, color television receivers and monitors, and 
components thereof, by reason of infringement of claims 7-11 and 13-15 
of U.S. Patent No. 5,270,821 and claims 1, 2, 4, and 5 of U.S. Patent 
No. 6,683,842. The complaint further alleges that an industry in the 
United States exists as required by subsection (a)(3) of section 337.
    The complainants request that the Commission institute an 
investigation and, after the investigation, issue an exclusion order 
and a cease and desist order.

ADDRESSES: The complaint, except for any confidential information 
contained therein, is available for inspection during official business 
hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. 
International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Room 112, 
Washington, DC 20436, telephone 202-205-2000. Hearing impaired 
individuals are advised that information on this matter can be obtained 
by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal on 202-205-1810. Persons 
with mobility impairment who will need special assistance in gaining 
access to the Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at 
202-205-2000. General information concerning the Commission may be 
obtained by accessing its Internet server (https://www.usitc.gov). The 
public record for this investigation may be reviewed on the 
Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jay H. Reiziss, Esq., Office of Unfair 
Import Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, telephone 
202-205-2579.

    Authority: The authority for institution of this investigation 
is contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 
and in section 210.10 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and 
Procedures, 19 CFR 210.10(2004).

    Scope of Investigation: Having considered the complaint, the U.S. 
International Trade Commission, on June 13, 2005, ordered that--
    (1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 
1930, as amended, an investigation be instituted to determine whether 
there is a violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of section 337 in the 
importation into the United States, the sale for importation, or the 
sale within the United States after importation of certain DVD/CD 
players or recorders, color television receivers or monitors, or 
components thereof, by reason of infringement of one or more of claims 
7-11 and 13-15 of U.S. Patent No. 5,270,821, or claims 1, 2, 4, or 5 of 
U.S. Patent No. 6,683,842, and whether an industry in the United States 
exists as required by subsection (a)(3) of section 337.
    (2) For the purpose of the investigation so instituted, the 
following are hereby named as parties upon which this notice of 
investigation shall be served:
    (a) The complainants are--

BenQ Corporation, 157 Shan-Ying Rd, Gueishan, Taoyuan 333, Taiwan.
BenQ Corporation, 53 Discovery, Irvine, California 92618.

    (b) The respondent is the following company alleged to be in 
violation of section 337, and is the party upon which the complaint is 
to be served:

Thomson Inc., 10330 N. Meridian Street, Indianapolis, IN 46290-1024.

    (c) Jay H. Reiziss, Esq., Office of Unfair Import Investigations, 
U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Suite 401, 
Washington, DC 20436, who shall be the Commission investigative 
attorney, party to this investigation; and
    For the investigation so instituted, the Honorable Robert L. 
Barton, Jr. is designated as the presiding administrative law judge.
    A response to the complaint and the notice of investigation must be

[[Page 35454]]

submitted by the named respondent in accordance with section 210.13 of 
the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13. 
Pursuant to 19 CFR 201.16(d) and 210.13(a), such response will be 
considered by the Commission if received no later than 20 days after 
the date of service by the Commission of the complaint and the notice 
of investigation. Extensions of time for submitting the response to the 
complaint will not be granted unless good cause therefor is shown.
    Failure of the respondent to file a timely response to each 
allegation in the complaint and in this notice may be deemed to 
constitute a waiver of the right to appear and contest the allegations 
of the complaint and to authorize the administrative law judge and the 
Commission, without further notice to the respondent, to find the facts 
to be as alleged in the complaint and this notice and to enter both an 
initial determination and a final determination containing such 
findings, and may result in the issuance of an exclusion order or cease 
and desist orders or both directed against the respondent.

    By order of the Commission.
    Issued: June 14, 2005.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 05-12037 Filed 6-17-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-M

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.