Raw in-Shell Pistachios From Iran, 35116-35117 [05-11869]

Download as PDF 35116 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 115 / Thursday, June 16, 2005 / Notices and meeting facilitators. The primary purpose of these meetings will be to bring together interested parties to discuss the scope of the proposed action, reasonable alternatives to the proposed action, and other significant issues relating to the EIS preparation. We will consider other reasonable alternatives that may be suggested in the scoping process. The other issues include the identification of impact topics, data needs, and national, State, and local concerns that need to be considered. If meetings are held, the format will be structured to promote interaction among the participants to determine what issues and concerns should be addressed by the EIS. We have identified five potential locations below where we are prepared to conduct public meetings if we receive sufficient interest. Please call, write, or email the person listed under the section FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT if you are interested in participating in a meeting at the location listed. For logistical reasons and for the benefit of the participants, we need to know approximately how many participants we can expect at each of the meetings. • Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. • Knoxville, Tennessee. • Alton, Illinois. • Denver, Colorado. • Washington, DC. If a meeting is held, we will have some means available to make a formal record, which will be made part of the administrative record for the EIS. If you have written suggestions regarding issues, alternatives, and sources of additional information, we encourage you to give us a copy at the meeting. We will consider these written comments and also make them part of the record. Any disabled individual who needs special accommodation to attend a public meeting is encouraged to contact the person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT. If you wish to speak to an OSM representative to discuss the scope of the EIS or if you would like to request an additional meeting at a location and date that is more convenient to you, please contact the person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT. We will exercise our discretion as to whether additional meetings will be held and the form of such meetings. We will announce the details of any future meeting in the Federal Register, the OSM Web site (https://www.osmre.gov) and local newspapers as the meetings take form. VerDate jul<14>2003 15:42 Jun 15, 2005 Jkt 205001 Dated: May 2, 2005. Sterling J. Rideout, Assistant Director, Program Support. [FR Doc. 05–11926 Filed 6–15–05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4310–05–P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation No. 337–TA–529] In the Matter of Certain Digital Processors, Digital Processing Systems, Components Thereof, and Products Containing Same; Notice of a Commission Determination Not To Review an Initial Determination Granting a Motion To Amend Complaint and Notice of Investigation U.S. International Trade Commission. ACTION: Notice. AGENCY: SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission has determined not to review the presiding administrative law judge’s (‘‘ALJ’s’’) initial determination (‘‘ID’’) granting complainant’s motion to amend the complaint and notice of investigation in the above-captioned investigation to add claims 5 and 6 of U.S. Patent No. 5,517,628. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Timothy P. Monaghan, Esq., Office of the General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone 202– 205–3152. Copies of the nonconfidential version of the ID and all nonconfidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are or will be available for inspection during official business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Washington DC 20436, telephone 202–205–2000. Hearingimpaired persons are advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202– 205–1810. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server (https://www.usitc.gov). The public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission instituted this investigation on January 6, 2005 (70 FR 1277) based on a complaint filed on behalf of BIAX Corporation (‘‘BIAX’’), of Boulder, Colorado. The complaint alleged violations of section 337 in the importation into the United States, sale PO 00000 Frm 00055 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 for importation, and sale within the United States after importation of certain digital processors, digital processing systems, components thereof, and products containing same by reason of infringement of certain claims of five U.S. patents, US Patent Nos. 4,487,755; 5,021,954; 5,517,628 (‘‘the ‘628 patent’’); 6,253,313; and 5,765,037. The notice of investigation named Texas Instruments, Inc., of Dallas, Texas; iBiquit Digital Corporation, of Columbia, Maryland; Kenwood Corporation, of Japan; and Kenwood U.S.A. Corporation, of Long Beach, California as respondents. On May 17, 2005, the ALJ issued the subject ID, Order No. 10, granting complainant’s motion to amend the complainant and notice of the investigation to add claims 5 and 6 of the 628 patent. No party filed a petition to review the subject ID. This action is taken under the authority of section 337 of the Tariff at of 1930, 19 U.S.C. 1337, and section 210.42 of Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.42. By order of the Commission. Issued: June 10, 2005. Marilyn R. Abbott, Secretary of the Commission. [FR Doc. 05–11868 Filed 6–15–05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–M INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation No. 731–TA–287 (Review)] Raw in-Shell Pistachios From Iran United States International Trade Commission ACTION: Notice of Commission determination to conduct a full five-year review concerning the antidumping duty order on raw in-shell pistachios from Iran. AGENCY: SUMMARY: The Commission hereby gives notice that it will proceed with a full review pursuant to section 751(c)(5) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)(5)) to determine whether revocation of the antidumping duty order on raw in-shell pistachios from Iran would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury within a reasonably foreseeable time. A schedule for the review will be established and announced at a later date. For further information concerning the conduct of this review and rules of general application, consult the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure, part 201, subparts A through E (19 CFR part 201), and part 207, E:\FR\FM\16JNN1.SGM 16JNN1 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 115 / Thursday, June 16, 2005 / Notices subparts A, D, E, and F (19 CFR part 207). EFFECTIVE DATES: June 6, 1005. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mary Messer (202) 205–3193), Office of Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436. Hearingimpaired persons can obtain information on this matter by contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal on (202) 205–1810. Persons with mobility impairments who will need special assistance in gaining access to the Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at (202) 205–2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server (https:// www.usitc.gov). The public record for this review may be viewed on the Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On June 6, 2005, the Commission determined that it should proceed to a full review in the subject five-year review pursuant to section 751(c)(5) of the Act. The Commission found that the domestic interested party group response to its notice of institution (70 FR 9976, March 1, 2005) was adequate and that the respondent interested party group response was inadequate. The Commission also found that other circumstances warranted conducting a full review.1 A record of the Commissioners’ votes, the Commission’s statement on adequacy, and any individual Commissioner’s statements will be available from the Office of the Secretary and at the Commission’s Web site. Authority: This review is being conducted under authority of title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930; this notice is published pursuant to section 207.62 of the Commission’s rules. Issued: June 10, 1005. By order of the Commission. Marilyn R. Abbott, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. 05–11869 Filed 6–15–05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–M DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Notice of Lodging of Consent Decree Under the Safe Drinking Water and Clean Water Act Consistent with 28 CFR 50.7, notice is hereby given that on June 6, 2005, a proposed consent decree (‘‘Decree’’) in United States v. BP America Production 1 Chairman Stephen Koplan and Commissioners Marcia E. Miller and Jennifer A. Hillman dissenting. VerDate jul<14>2003 15:42 Jun 15, 2005 Jkt 205001 Company, et al., Civil Action No. 05–CV 156J, was lodged with the United States District Court for Wyoming. In this action, the United States seeks penalties and injunctive relief against BP America Production Company f/k/a Amoco Production Company, CamWest, Inc., and CamWest Limited Partnership under section 1423(b) of the Safe Drinking Water Act and section 309 of the Clean Water Act, based on violations alleged at the Lander and Winkleman Dome Oil Fields in Fremont County, Wyoming, within the exterior boundaries of the Wind River Indian Reservation. The United States has also sought penalties under section 311 of the Clean Water Act as to the CamWest entities. The settlement provides for a series of Supplemental Environmental Projects (‘‘SEPs’’) for the benefit of the Eastern Shoshone Tribe and the Northern Arapaho Tribe—the two tribes living at the Wind River Indian Reservation and for CamWest to perform certain injunctive relief. CamWest will pay a civil penalty of $487,352 and contribute $429,621 to the SEPs, for a total of $916,973. BP Amoco will pay a civil penalty of $115,138 and contribute $295,335 towards the SEPs, for a total of $410,473. The total value of this settlement, not including the injunctive relief performed by CamWest, is $1,327,446. The Department of Justice will receive for a period of thirty (30) days from the date of this publication comments relating to the decree. Comments should be addressed to the Assistant Attorney General, Environment and Natural Resources Division, P.O. Box 7611, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC 20044–7611, and should refer to United States v. BP America Production Company et al., D.J. Ref 90–5–1–1– 07294/1, 90–5–1–1–07294. The decree may be examined at the Office of the United States Attorney, 2120 Capitol Ave., Cheyenne, Wyoming 82001, and at the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency—Region VIII, 999— 18th Street, Denver, Colorado 80202– 2466. During the public comment, the decree may also be examined on the following Department of Justice Web site, https://www.uddoj.gov/enrd/ open.htlm. A copy of the decree may also be obtained by mail from the Consent Decree Library, P.O. Box 7611, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC 20044–7611 or by faxing or emailing a request to Tonia Fleetwood (tonia.fleetwood@usdoj.gov), fax no. (202) 514–0097, phone confirmation number (202) 514–1547. In requesting a copy from the Consent Decree Library, please enclose a check in the amount of $14.50 (not including attachments) (25 PO 00000 Frm 00056 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 35117 cents per page reproduction cost) payable to the U.S. Treasury. Robert Brook, Assistant Chief, Environmental Enforcement Section, Environment and Natural Resources Section. [FR Doc. 05–11851 Filed 6–15–05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4410–15–M DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Notice of Lodging of Consent Decree Under Cercla Consistent with to 28 CFR 50.7, notice is hereby given that on May 31, 2005, a proposed consent decree (‘‘decree’’) in United States and the State of Colorado v. The B&B Mines, Inc., French Gulch Mines, Inc., Diamond Dick Co., Eckart Patch Co., Little Lizzie Limited Liability Company, and Wire Patch Limited Liability Company, Civil Action No. 05– CV–992–EWN–OES, was lodged with the United States District Court for the District of Colorado. In this action, the United States and the State seek reimbursement of costs incurred and to be incurred for response actions, and natural resource damages, under Sections 106 and 107 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (‘‘CERCLA’’) in connection with the Wellington/Oro French Creek Superfund Site in Summit County, Colorado (‘‘Site’’). Parties to the prosed consent decree include Summit County and the Town of Breckenridge as Bona Fide Prospective Purchasers who will perform certain response actions at the Site and preserve it as Open Space. The Department of Justice will receive for a period of thirty (30) days from the date of this publication comments relating to the decree. Comments should be addressed to the Assistant Attorney General, Environment and Natural Resources Division, P.O. Box 7611, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC 20044–7611, and should refer to United States and the State of Colorado v. The B&B Mines, Inc., French Gulch Mines, Inc., Diamond Dick Co., Eckart Patch Co., Little Lizzie Limited Liability Company, and Wire Patch Limited Liability Company, D.J. Ref. 90–11–2– 06306/1. The decree may be examined at the U.S. Environmental Protection AgencyRegion 8, 999 18th Street, Suite 300, Denver, CO 80202. During the public comment period, the decree (without attachments) may also be examined on the following Department of Justice Web site, https://www.usdoj.gov/enrd/ open.html. A copy of the decree may also be obtained by mail from the E:\FR\FM\16JNN1.SGM 16JNN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 115 (Thursday, June 16, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 35116-35117]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-11869]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Investigation No. 731-TA-287 (Review)]


Raw in-Shell Pistachios From Iran

AGENCY: United States International Trade Commission

ACTION: Notice of Commission determination to conduct a full five-year 
review concerning the antidumping duty order on raw in-shell pistachios 
from Iran.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Commission hereby gives notice that it will proceed with a 
full review pursuant to section 751(c)(5) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 
U.S.C. 1675(c)(5)) to determine whether revocation of the antidumping 
duty order on raw in-shell pistachios from Iran would be likely to lead 
to continuation or recurrence of material injury within a reasonably 
foreseeable time. A schedule for the review will be established and 
announced at a later date. For further information concerning the 
conduct of this review and rules of general application, consult the 
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, part 201, subparts A 
through E (19 CFR part 201), and part 207,

[[Page 35117]]

subparts A, D, E, and F (19 CFR part 207).

EFFECTIVE DATES: June 6, 1005.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mary Messer (202) 205-3193), Office of 
Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., 
Washington, DC 20436. Hearing-impaired persons can obtain information 
on this matter by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal on (202) 
205-1810. Persons with mobility impairments who will need special 
assistance in gaining access to the Commission should contact the 
Office of the Secretary at (202) 205-2000. General information 
concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its 
Internet server (https://www.usitc.gov). The public record for this 
review may be viewed on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at 
https://edis.usitc.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On June 6, 2005, the Commission determined 
that it should proceed to a full review in the subject five-year review 
pursuant to section 751(c)(5) of the Act. The Commission found that the 
domestic interested party group response to its notice of institution 
(70 FR 9976, March 1, 2005) was adequate and that the respondent 
interested party group response was inadequate. The Commission also 
found that other circumstances warranted conducting a full review.\1\ A 
record of the Commissioners' votes, the Commission's statement on 
adequacy, and any individual Commissioner's statements will be 
available from the Office of the Secretary and at the Commission's Web 
site.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ Chairman Stephen Koplan and Commissioners Marcia E. Miller 
and Jennifer A. Hillman dissenting.

    Authority: This review is being conducted under authority of 
title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930; this notice is published 
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
pursuant to section 207.62 of the Commission's rules.

    Issued: June 10, 1005.

    By order of the Commission.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 05-11869 Filed 6-15-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-M
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.