Syracuse China, Syracuse, NY; Notice of Revised Determination on Reconsideration of Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance, 34157-34158 [E5-3029]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 112 / Monday, June 13, 2005 / Notices
34157
APPENDIX—Continued
[Petitions instituted between 05/16/2005 and 05/20/2005]
Subject firm
(petitioners)
Location
Intradeco Apparel (NPS) .........................................
Laser Tool Co. (Wkrs) .............................................
DAP Technologies Corp. (Wkrs) .............................
Hampden Corp. (Comp) ..........................................
True Value Company (Comp) .................................
K and T Jewelry Accessories, Inc. (Wkrs) ..............
Penn Ventilation, Inc. (Wkrs) ..................................
Neasi-Weber International (Wkrs) ...........................
AMETEK U.S. Gauge Division (Comp) ..................
Gillette Company (The) (Comp) ..............................
CDI Business Solutions (Wkrs) ...............................
Frederick Cooper Lamps (Comp) ...........................
Assembly Services and Packaging, Inc. (Comp) ...
Intermark Fabric Corp. (State) ................................
Royal Oak Enterprises (Wkrs) ................................
Motor Components, LLC (Comp) ............................
Storage Tek (State) .................................................
Wiremold/Legrand (Comp) ......................................
General Dynamics (Wkrs) .......................................
Printronix, Inc. (State) .............................................
Aerotek (State) ........................................................
TRW Automotive (NPC) ..........................................
Sandisk Corporation (State) ....................................
Omnova Solutions, Inc. (USWA) ............................
Plastic Dress-up Co. (Comp) ..................................
Gilmour Manufacturing (Comp) ...............................
Wade Manufacturing Co. (Comp) ...........................
Frank L. Wells Co. Wellsco Control Inc. (Wkrs) .....
Riverside Paper Co. (PACE) ..................................
Geiger of Austria, Inc. (Comp) ................................
Texas Boot, Inc. (Comp) .........................................
Culp Finishing (Wkrs) ..............................................
Ward Products, LLC (IBEW) ...................................
Meridan Automotive Systems (Wkrs) .....................
Screen and Stitch, Inc. (Comp) ..............................
Danly IEM (State) ....................................................
Black Box Network Services (Wkrs) .......................
St. John Knits (State) ..............................................
Renaissance Mart (Wkrs) .......................................
Lear Corporation (UAW) .........................................
AMI Doduco (Comp) ...............................................
Medley, FL ..........................................
Saegertown, PA ..................................
Plattsburgh, NY ...................................
Chicago, IL .........................................
Cary, IL ...............................................
Providence, RI ....................................
Tabor City, NC ....................................
Houston, TX ........................................
Sellerville, PA .....................................
Lexington, NC .....................................
Corvallis, OR .......................................
Chicago, IL .........................................
Hudson, WI .........................................
Plainfield, CT ......................................
White City, OR ....................................
Elmira, NY ..........................................
Brooklyn Park, MN ..............................
Philadelphia, PA .................................
Imperial, CA ........................................
Irvine, CA ............................................
Portland, OR .......................................
El Paso, TX .........................................
Sunnyvale, CA ....................................
Jeannette, PA .....................................
S. Eli Monet, CA .................................
Somerset, PA ......................................
Wadesboro, NC ..................................
Kenosha, WI .......................................
Appleton, WI .......................................
Middlebury, VT ....................................
Waynesboro, TN .................................
Burlington, NC ....................................
Amsterdam, NY ..................................
Canandaigua, NY ...............................
Park Falls, WI .....................................
Ionia, MI ..............................................
Corvallis, OR .......................................
San Ysidro, CA ...................................
Bowling Green, KY .............................
Monroe, MI .........................................
Reidsville, NC .....................................
TA-W
57,191
57,192
57,193
57,194
57,195
57,196
57,197
57,198
57,199
57,200
57,201
57,202
57,203
57,204
57,205
57,206
57,207
57,208
57,209
57,210
57,211
57,212
57,213
57,214
57,215
57,216
57,217
57,218
57,219
57,220
57,221
57,222
57,223
57,224
57,225
57,226
57,227
57,228
57,229
57,230
57,231
...............
...............
...............
...............
...............
...............
...............
...............
...............
...............
...............
...............
...............
...............
...............
...............
...............
...............
...............
...............
...............
...............
...............
...............
...............
...............
...............
...............
...............
...............
...............
...............
...............
...............
...............
...............
...............
...............
...............
...............
...............
[FR Doc. E5–3040 Filed 6–10–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–30–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
[TA–W–56,633]
Syracuse China, Syracuse, NY; Notice
of Revised Determination on
Reconsideration of Alternative Trade
Adjustment Assistance
By letter dated May 19, 2005, a
petitioner requested administrative
reconsideration regarding Alternative
Trade Adjustment Assistance (ATAA)
applicable to workers of the subject
firm. The negative determination was
signed on March 31, 2005, and was
VerDate jul<14>2003
16:45 Jun 10, 2005
Jkt 205001
published in the Federal Register on
May 2, 2005 (70 FR 22712).
The workers of Syracuse China,
Syracuse, New York were certified
eligible to apply for Trade Adjustment
Assistance (TAA) on March 31, 2005.
The initial ATAA investigation
determined that the skills of the subject
worker group are easily transferable to
other positions in the local area.
Upon further contacts with the
company official it was confirmed that
the skills of the workers at the subject
firm are not easily transferable in the
local commuting area.
Additional investigation has
determined that the workers possess
skills that are not easily transferable. A
significant number or proportion of the
worker group are age fifty years or over.
Competitive conditions within the
industry are adverse.
PO 00000
Frm 00076
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Date of
institution
05/17/2005
05/17/2005
05/17/2005
05/17/2005
05/17/2005
05/17/2005
05/17/2005
05/17/2005
05/17/2005
05/18/2005
05/18/2005
05/18/2005
05/18/2005
05/18/2005
05/18/2005
05/18/2005
05/18/2005
05/19/2005
05/19/2005
05/19/2005
05/19/2005
05/19/2005
05/19/2005
05/19/2005
05/19/2005
05/19/2005
05/19/2005
05/19/2005
05/19/2005
05/19/2005
05/19/2005
05/19/2005
05/19/2005
05/19/2005
05/20/2005
05/20/2005
05/20/2005
05/20/2005
05/20/2005
05/20/2005
05/20/2005
Date of
petition
05/17/2005
05/17/2005
05/12/2005
05/10/2005
05/09/2005
05/09/2005
05/06/2005
05/04/2005
05/06/2005
05/16/2005
05/17/2005
05/17/2005
05/17/2005
05/17/2005
05/17/2005
05/18/2005
05/17/2005
05/18/2005
04/21/2005
05/18/2005
05/18/2005
05/18/2005
05/18/2005
05/06/2005
04/26/2005
05/18/2005
05/18/2005
05/19/2005
05/19/2005
05/12/2005
05/03/2005
05/12/2005
05/11/2005
05/10/2005
05/16/2005
05/02/2005
05/18/2005
05/19/2005
05/16/2005
05/19/2005
05/06/2005
Conclusion
After careful review of the additional
facts obtained on reconsideration, I
conclude that the requirements of
Section 246 of the Trade Act of 1974, as
amended, have been met for workers at
the subject firm.
In accordance with the provisions of
the Act, I make the following
certification:
All workers of Syracuse China, Syracuse,
New York, who became totally or partially
separated from employment on or after
February 8, 2004 through March 31, 2007, are
eligible to apply for trade adjustment
assistance under Section 223 of the Trade Act
of 1974, and are also eligible to apply for
alternative trade adjustment assistance under
Section 246 of the Trade Act of 1974.
E:\FR\FM\13JNN1.SGM
13JNN1
34158
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 112 / Monday, June 13, 2005 / Notices
Signed in Washington, DC, this 2nd day of
June, 2005.
Elliott S. Kushner,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade
Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E5–3029 Filed 6–10–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–30–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
[TA–W–56,701]
Twigs & Ivy Boutique, Potosi, MO;
Negative Determination Regarding
Application for Reconsideration
By application of April 14, 2005, a
petitioner requested administrative
reconsideration of the Department’s
negative determination regarding
eligibility for workers and former
workers of the subject firm to apply for
Trade Adjustment Assistance (TAA).
The denial notice was signed on May 2,
2005, (70 FR 22710).
Pursuant to 29 CFR 90.18(c)
reconsideration may be granted under
the following circumstances:
(1) If it appears on the basis of facts
not previously considered that the
determination complained of was
erroneous;
(2) if it appears that the determination
complained of was based on a mistake
in the determination of facts not
previously considered; or
(3) if in the opinion of the Certifying
Officer, a misinterpretation of facts or of
the law justified reconsideration of the
decision.
The TAA petition, which was filed on
behalf of workers at Twigs & Ivy
Boutique, Potosi, Missouri engaged in
the production of floral arrangements,
was denied based on the findings that
during the relevant time period, the
subject company did not separate or
threaten to separate a significant
number or proportion of workers, as
required by Section 222 of the Trade Act
of 1974.
In the request for reconsideration, the
petitioner alleges that there was an
additional employee of Twigs & Ivy
Boutique who was mistakenly omitted
from the employment list originally
submitted to the Department by the
company official.
This alleged employee was contacted
by the Department to confirm the above
statement. The employee stated that she
worked for Twigs & Ivy Boutique,
Potosi, Missouri in 2002.
When assessing eligibility for TAA,
the Department exclusively considers
the relevant employment data for the
VerDate jul<14>2003
16:45 Jun 10, 2005
Jkt 205001
facility where the petitioning worker
group was employed. The relevant
period represents four quarters back
from the date of the petition, thus data
from 2002 is irrelevant in this
investigation. As fewer than three
workers were impacted at the subject
firm during the relevant time period,
employment threshold requirement as
outlined in Section 222 of the Trade Act
of 1974 was not met.
Conclusion
After review of the application and
investigative findings, I conclude that
there has been no error or
misinterpretation of the law or of the
facts which would justify
reconsideration of the Department of
Labor’s prior decision. Accordingly, the
application is denied.
Signed at Washington, DC, this 27th day of
May, 2005.
Elliott S. Kushner,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade
Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E5–3030 Filed 6–10–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–30–P
NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND
SPACE ADMINISTRATION
[Notice: 05–105]
Notice of Information Collection
National Aeronautics and
Space Administration (NASA).
ACTION: Notice of information collection.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The National Aeronautics and
Space Administration, as part of its
continuing effort to reduce paperwork
and respondent burden, invites the
general public and other Federal
agencies to take this opportunity to
comment on proposed and/or
continuing information collections, as
required by the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–13, 44 U.S.C.
3506(c)(2)(A)).
DATES: All comments should be
submitted within 60 calendar days from
the date of this publication.
ADDRESSES: All comments should be
addressed to Kathy Shaeffer, Mail Suite
6M70, Office of the Chief Information
Officer, National Aeronautics and Space
Administration, Washington, DC 20546–
0001.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Requests for additional information or
copies of the information collection
instrument(s) and instructions should
be directed to Kathy Shaeffer, Acting
NASA Reports Officer, Office of the
Chief Information Officer, NASA
Headquarters, 300 E Street SW., Mail
PO 00000
Frm 00077
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Suite 6M70, Washington, DC 20546,
(202) 358–1230, kathleen.shaeffer1@nasa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Abstract
NASA Johnson Space Center is
licensed to collect and maintain records
of radioactive material used for spacerelated research and space vehicles at
temporary job sites in the U.S.
Information collected includes
descriptions, transfer, location, and
disposition of materials and records of
accountability and responsibility.
Respondents are NASA field centers
and NASA contractors, subcontractors,
and vendors.
II. Method of Collection
NASA collects this information
electronically where feasible, but
information may also be collected by
mail or fax.
III. Data
Title: Radioactive Material Transfer
Receipt.
OMB Number: 2700–0007.
Type of review: Extension of a
currently approved collection.
Affected Public: Business or other forprofit; Not-for-profit institutions;
Federal Government; State, local or
tribal government.
Estimated Number of Respondents:
25.
Estimated Time Per Response:
approximately 30 minutes.
Estimated Total Annual Burden
Hours: 10.
Estimated Total Annual Cost: $0.
IV. Request for Comments
Comments are invited on: (1) Whether
the proposed collection of information
is necessary for the proper performance
of the functions of NASA, including
whether the information collected has
practical utility; (2) the accuracy of
NASA’s estimate of the burden
(including hours and cost) of the
proposed collection of information; (3)
ways to enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and (4) ways to minimize the
burden of the collection of information
on respondents, including automated
collection techniques or the use of other
forms of information technology.
Comments submitted in response to
this notice will be summarized and
included in the request for OMB
approval of this information collection.
They will also become a matter of
public record.
E:\FR\FM\13JNN1.SGM
13JNN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 112 (Monday, June 13, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 34157-34158]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E5-3029]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training Administration
[TA-W-56,633]
Syracuse China, Syracuse, NY; Notice of Revised Determination on
Reconsideration of Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance
By letter dated May 19, 2005, a petitioner requested administrative
reconsideration regarding Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance
(ATAA) applicable to workers of the subject firm. The negative
determination was signed on March 31, 2005, and was published in the
Federal Register on May 2, 2005 (70 FR 22712).
The workers of Syracuse China, Syracuse, New York were certified
eligible to apply for Trade Adjustment Assistance (TAA) on March 31,
2005.
The initial ATAA investigation determined that the skills of the
subject worker group are easily transferable to other positions in the
local area.
Upon further contacts with the company official it was confirmed
that the skills of the workers at the subject firm are not easily
transferable in the local commuting area.
Additional investigation has determined that the workers possess
skills that are not easily transferable. A significant number or
proportion of the worker group are age fifty years or over. Competitive
conditions within the industry are adverse.
Conclusion
After careful review of the additional facts obtained on
reconsideration, I conclude that the requirements of Section 246 of the
Trade Act of 1974, as amended, have been met for workers at the subject
firm.
In accordance with the provisions of the Act, I make the following
certification:
All workers of Syracuse China, Syracuse, New York, who became
totally or partially separated from employment on or after February
8, 2004 through March 31, 2007, are eligible to apply for trade
adjustment assistance under Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974,
and are also eligible to apply for alternative trade adjustment
assistance under Section 246 of the Trade Act of 1974.
[[Page 34158]]
Signed in Washington, DC, this 2nd day of June, 2005.
Elliott S. Kushner,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E5-3029 Filed 6-10-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-P
