Syracuse China, Syracuse, NY; Notice of Revised Determination on Reconsideration of Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance, 34157-34158 [E5-3029]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 112 / Monday, June 13, 2005 / Notices 34157 APPENDIX—Continued [Petitions instituted between 05/16/2005 and 05/20/2005] Subject firm (petitioners) Location Intradeco Apparel (NPS) ......................................... Laser Tool Co. (Wkrs) ............................................. DAP Technologies Corp. (Wkrs) ............................. Hampden Corp. (Comp) .......................................... True Value Company (Comp) ................................. K and T Jewelry Accessories, Inc. (Wkrs) .............. Penn Ventilation, Inc. (Wkrs) .................................. Neasi-Weber International (Wkrs) ........................... AMETEK U.S. Gauge Division (Comp) .................. Gillette Company (The) (Comp) .............................. CDI Business Solutions (Wkrs) ............................... Frederick Cooper Lamps (Comp) ........................... Assembly Services and Packaging, Inc. (Comp) ... Intermark Fabric Corp. (State) ................................ Royal Oak Enterprises (Wkrs) ................................ Motor Components, LLC (Comp) ............................ Storage Tek (State) ................................................. Wiremold/Legrand (Comp) ...................................... General Dynamics (Wkrs) ....................................... Printronix, Inc. (State) ............................................. Aerotek (State) ........................................................ TRW Automotive (NPC) .......................................... Sandisk Corporation (State) .................................... Omnova Solutions, Inc. (USWA) ............................ Plastic Dress-up Co. (Comp) .................................. Gilmour Manufacturing (Comp) ............................... Wade Manufacturing Co. (Comp) ........................... Frank L. Wells Co. Wellsco Control Inc. (Wkrs) ..... Riverside Paper Co. (PACE) .................................. Geiger of Austria, Inc. (Comp) ................................ Texas Boot, Inc. (Comp) ......................................... Culp Finishing (Wkrs) .............................................. Ward Products, LLC (IBEW) ................................... Meridan Automotive Systems (Wkrs) ..................... Screen and Stitch, Inc. (Comp) .............................. Danly IEM (State) .................................................... Black Box Network Services (Wkrs) ....................... St. John Knits (State) .............................................. Renaissance Mart (Wkrs) ....................................... Lear Corporation (UAW) ......................................... AMI Doduco (Comp) ............................................... Medley, FL .......................................... Saegertown, PA .................................. Plattsburgh, NY ................................... Chicago, IL ......................................... Cary, IL ............................................... Providence, RI .................................... Tabor City, NC .................................... Houston, TX ........................................ Sellerville, PA ..................................... Lexington, NC ..................................... Corvallis, OR ....................................... Chicago, IL ......................................... Hudson, WI ......................................... Plainfield, CT ...................................... White City, OR .................................... Elmira, NY .......................................... Brooklyn Park, MN .............................. Philadelphia, PA ................................. Imperial, CA ........................................ Irvine, CA ............................................ Portland, OR ....................................... El Paso, TX ......................................... Sunnyvale, CA .................................... Jeannette, PA ..................................... S. Eli Monet, CA ................................. Somerset, PA ...................................... Wadesboro, NC .................................. Kenosha, WI ....................................... Appleton, WI ....................................... Middlebury, VT .................................... Waynesboro, TN ................................. Burlington, NC .................................... Amsterdam, NY .................................. Canandaigua, NY ............................... Park Falls, WI ..................................... Ionia, MI .............................................. Corvallis, OR ....................................... San Ysidro, CA ................................... Bowling Green, KY ............................. Monroe, MI ......................................... Reidsville, NC ..................................... TA-W 57,191 57,192 57,193 57,194 57,195 57,196 57,197 57,198 57,199 57,200 57,201 57,202 57,203 57,204 57,205 57,206 57,207 57,208 57,209 57,210 57,211 57,212 57,213 57,214 57,215 57,216 57,217 57,218 57,219 57,220 57,221 57,222 57,223 57,224 57,225 57,226 57,227 57,228 57,229 57,230 57,231 ............... ............... ............... ............... ............... ............... ............... ............... ............... ............... ............... ............... ............... ............... ............... ............... ............... ............... ............... ............... ............... ............... ............... ............... ............... ............... ............... ............... ............... ............... ............... ............... ............... ............... ............... ............... ............... ............... ............... ............... ............... [FR Doc. E5–3040 Filed 6–10–05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4510–30–P DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Employment and Training Administration [TA–W–56,633] Syracuse China, Syracuse, NY; Notice of Revised Determination on Reconsideration of Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance By letter dated May 19, 2005, a petitioner requested administrative reconsideration regarding Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance (ATAA) applicable to workers of the subject firm. The negative determination was signed on March 31, 2005, and was VerDate jul<14>2003 16:45 Jun 10, 2005 Jkt 205001 published in the Federal Register on May 2, 2005 (70 FR 22712). The workers of Syracuse China, Syracuse, New York were certified eligible to apply for Trade Adjustment Assistance (TAA) on March 31, 2005. The initial ATAA investigation determined that the skills of the subject worker group are easily transferable to other positions in the local area. Upon further contacts with the company official it was confirmed that the skills of the workers at the subject firm are not easily transferable in the local commuting area. Additional investigation has determined that the workers possess skills that are not easily transferable. A significant number or proportion of the worker group are age fifty years or over. Competitive conditions within the industry are adverse. PO 00000 Frm 00076 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 Date of institution 05/17/2005 05/17/2005 05/17/2005 05/17/2005 05/17/2005 05/17/2005 05/17/2005 05/17/2005 05/17/2005 05/18/2005 05/18/2005 05/18/2005 05/18/2005 05/18/2005 05/18/2005 05/18/2005 05/18/2005 05/19/2005 05/19/2005 05/19/2005 05/19/2005 05/19/2005 05/19/2005 05/19/2005 05/19/2005 05/19/2005 05/19/2005 05/19/2005 05/19/2005 05/19/2005 05/19/2005 05/19/2005 05/19/2005 05/19/2005 05/20/2005 05/20/2005 05/20/2005 05/20/2005 05/20/2005 05/20/2005 05/20/2005 Date of petition 05/17/2005 05/17/2005 05/12/2005 05/10/2005 05/09/2005 05/09/2005 05/06/2005 05/04/2005 05/06/2005 05/16/2005 05/17/2005 05/17/2005 05/17/2005 05/17/2005 05/17/2005 05/18/2005 05/17/2005 05/18/2005 04/21/2005 05/18/2005 05/18/2005 05/18/2005 05/18/2005 05/06/2005 04/26/2005 05/18/2005 05/18/2005 05/19/2005 05/19/2005 05/12/2005 05/03/2005 05/12/2005 05/11/2005 05/10/2005 05/16/2005 05/02/2005 05/18/2005 05/19/2005 05/16/2005 05/19/2005 05/06/2005 Conclusion After careful review of the additional facts obtained on reconsideration, I conclude that the requirements of Section 246 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, have been met for workers at the subject firm. In accordance with the provisions of the Act, I make the following certification: All workers of Syracuse China, Syracuse, New York, who became totally or partially separated from employment on or after February 8, 2004 through March 31, 2007, are eligible to apply for trade adjustment assistance under Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, and are also eligible to apply for alternative trade adjustment assistance under Section 246 of the Trade Act of 1974. E:\FR\FM\13JNN1.SGM 13JNN1 34158 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 112 / Monday, June 13, 2005 / Notices Signed in Washington, DC, this 2nd day of June, 2005. Elliott S. Kushner, Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance. [FR Doc. E5–3029 Filed 6–10–05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4510–30–P DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Employment and Training Administration [TA–W–56,701] Twigs & Ivy Boutique, Potosi, MO; Negative Determination Regarding Application for Reconsideration By application of April 14, 2005, a petitioner requested administrative reconsideration of the Department’s negative determination regarding eligibility for workers and former workers of the subject firm to apply for Trade Adjustment Assistance (TAA). The denial notice was signed on May 2, 2005, (70 FR 22710). Pursuant to 29 CFR 90.18(c) reconsideration may be granted under the following circumstances: (1) If it appears on the basis of facts not previously considered that the determination complained of was erroneous; (2) if it appears that the determination complained of was based on a mistake in the determination of facts not previously considered; or (3) if in the opinion of the Certifying Officer, a misinterpretation of facts or of the law justified reconsideration of the decision. The TAA petition, which was filed on behalf of workers at Twigs & Ivy Boutique, Potosi, Missouri engaged in the production of floral arrangements, was denied based on the findings that during the relevant time period, the subject company did not separate or threaten to separate a significant number or proportion of workers, as required by Section 222 of the Trade Act of 1974. In the request for reconsideration, the petitioner alleges that there was an additional employee of Twigs & Ivy Boutique who was mistakenly omitted from the employment list originally submitted to the Department by the company official. This alleged employee was contacted by the Department to confirm the above statement. The employee stated that she worked for Twigs & Ivy Boutique, Potosi, Missouri in 2002. When assessing eligibility for TAA, the Department exclusively considers the relevant employment data for the VerDate jul<14>2003 16:45 Jun 10, 2005 Jkt 205001 facility where the petitioning worker group was employed. The relevant period represents four quarters back from the date of the petition, thus data from 2002 is irrelevant in this investigation. As fewer than three workers were impacted at the subject firm during the relevant time period, employment threshold requirement as outlined in Section 222 of the Trade Act of 1974 was not met. Conclusion After review of the application and investigative findings, I conclude that there has been no error or misinterpretation of the law or of the facts which would justify reconsideration of the Department of Labor’s prior decision. Accordingly, the application is denied. Signed at Washington, DC, this 27th day of May, 2005. Elliott S. Kushner, Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance. [FR Doc. E5–3030 Filed 6–10–05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4510–30–P NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION [Notice: 05–105] Notice of Information Collection National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA). ACTION: Notice of information collection. AGENCY: SUMMARY: The National Aeronautics and Space Administration, as part of its continuing effort to reduce paperwork and respondent burden, invites the general public and other Federal agencies to take this opportunity to comment on proposed and/or continuing information collections, as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–13, 44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A)). DATES: All comments should be submitted within 60 calendar days from the date of this publication. ADDRESSES: All comments should be addressed to Kathy Shaeffer, Mail Suite 6M70, Office of the Chief Information Officer, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Washington, DC 20546– 0001. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Requests for additional information or copies of the information collection instrument(s) and instructions should be directed to Kathy Shaeffer, Acting NASA Reports Officer, Office of the Chief Information Officer, NASA Headquarters, 300 E Street SW., Mail PO 00000 Frm 00077 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 Suite 6M70, Washington, DC 20546, (202) 358–1230, kathleen.shaeffer1@nasa.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: I. Abstract NASA Johnson Space Center is licensed to collect and maintain records of radioactive material used for spacerelated research and space vehicles at temporary job sites in the U.S. Information collected includes descriptions, transfer, location, and disposition of materials and records of accountability and responsibility. Respondents are NASA field centers and NASA contractors, subcontractors, and vendors. II. Method of Collection NASA collects this information electronically where feasible, but information may also be collected by mail or fax. III. Data Title: Radioactive Material Transfer Receipt. OMB Number: 2700–0007. Type of review: Extension of a currently approved collection. Affected Public: Business or other forprofit; Not-for-profit institutions; Federal Government; State, local or tribal government. Estimated Number of Respondents: 25. Estimated Time Per Response: approximately 30 minutes. Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours: 10. Estimated Total Annual Cost: $0. IV. Request for Comments Comments are invited on: (1) Whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of NASA, including whether the information collected has practical utility; (2) the accuracy of NASA’s estimate of the burden (including hours and cost) of the proposed collection of information; (3) ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and (4) ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on respondents, including automated collection techniques or the use of other forms of information technology. Comments submitted in response to this notice will be summarized and included in the request for OMB approval of this information collection. They will also become a matter of public record. E:\FR\FM\13JNN1.SGM 13JNN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 112 (Monday, June 13, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 34157-34158]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E5-3029]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-56,633]


Syracuse China, Syracuse, NY; Notice of Revised Determination on 
Reconsideration of Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance

    By letter dated May 19, 2005, a petitioner requested administrative 
reconsideration regarding Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance 
(ATAA) applicable to workers of the subject firm. The negative 
determination was signed on March 31, 2005, and was published in the 
Federal Register on May 2, 2005 (70 FR 22712).
    The workers of Syracuse China, Syracuse, New York were certified 
eligible to apply for Trade Adjustment Assistance (TAA) on March 31, 
2005.
    The initial ATAA investigation determined that the skills of the 
subject worker group are easily transferable to other positions in the 
local area.
    Upon further contacts with the company official it was confirmed 
that the skills of the workers at the subject firm are not easily 
transferable in the local commuting area.
    Additional investigation has determined that the workers possess 
skills that are not easily transferable. A significant number or 
proportion of the worker group are age fifty years or over. Competitive 
conditions within the industry are adverse.

Conclusion

    After careful review of the additional facts obtained on 
reconsideration, I conclude that the requirements of Section 246 of the 
Trade Act of 1974, as amended, have been met for workers at the subject 
firm.
    In accordance with the provisions of the Act, I make the following 
certification:

    All workers of Syracuse China, Syracuse, New York, who became 
totally or partially separated from employment on or after February 
8, 2004 through March 31, 2007, are eligible to apply for trade 
adjustment assistance under Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, 
and are also eligible to apply for alternative trade adjustment 
assistance under Section 246 of the Trade Act of 1974.


[[Page 34158]]


    Signed in Washington, DC, this 2nd day of June, 2005.
Elliott S. Kushner,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E5-3029 Filed 6-10-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-P