In the Matter of Certain Power Supply Controllers and Products Containing Same; Notice of Investigation, 34149-34150 [05-11649]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 112 / Monday, June 13, 2005 / Notices Reclamation Reform Act of 1982.’’ Also, according to Section 3405(e)(1), these Criteria must be developed ‘‘* * * with the purpose of promoting the highest level of water use efficiency reasonably achievable by project contractors using best available cost-effective technology and best management practices.’’ These Criteria state that all parties (Contractors) that contract with Reclamation for water supplies (municipal and industrial contracts over 2,000 acre-feet and agricultural contracts over 2,000 irrigable acres) must prepare Plans that contain the following information: 1. Description of the District 2. Inventory of Water Resources 3. BMPs for Agricultural Contractors 4. BMPs for Urban Contractors 5. BMP Plan Implementation 6. BMP Exemption Justification Reclamation will evaluate Plans based on these Criteria. A copy of these Plans will be available for review at Reclamation’s Mid-Pacific (MP) Regional Office located in Sacramento, California, and the local area office. Our practice is to make comments, including names and home addresses of respondents, available for public review. Individual respondents may request that Reclamation withhold their home address from public disclosure, and we will honor such request to the extent allowable by law. There also may be circumstances in which Reclamation would elect to withhold a respondent’s identity from public disclosure, as allowable by law. If you wish us to withhold your name and/or address, you must state this prominently at the beginning of your comments. We will make all submissions from organizations, businesses, and from individuals identifying themselves as representatives or officials of organizations or businesses available for public disclosure in their entirety. If you wish to review a copy of these Plans, please contact Ms. Barbre to find the office nearest you. Dated: May 9, 2005. Donna E. Tegelman, Regional Resources Manager, Mid-Pacific Region, Bureau of Reclamation. [FR Doc. 05–11615 Filed 6–10–05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4310–MN–P VerDate jul<14>2003 16:45 Jun 10, 2005 Jkt 205001 INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation No. 37–TA–541] In the Matter of Certain Power Supply Controllers and Products Containing Same; Notice of Investigation 34149 Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Anne Goodwin, Esq., Office of Unfair Import Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, telephone 202–205– 2574. U.S. International Trade Commission. ACTION: Institution of investigation pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 1337. Authority: The authority for institution of this investigation is contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and in section 210.10 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10 (2003). SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that a complaint filed with the U.S. International Trade Commission on May 9, 2005 under section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, on behalf of Power Integrations, Inc. of San Jose, California. A supplement to the complaint was filed on May 24, 2005. The complaint, as supplemented, alleges violation of section 337 in the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, and the sale within the United States after importation of certain power supply controllers and products containing same by reason of infringement of claims 1, 2, 3, 6, 9, and 17–19 of U.S. Patent No. 6,212,079; claims 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 24, 28, and 29 of U.S. Patent No. 6,351,398; claims 8 and 12 of U.S. Patent No. 6,366,481, and claims 1, 4, 9–11 13, 17, 19, 20, 22, 23, 26, 27, 30, 31, and 34 of U.S. Patent No. 6,538,908. The complaint further alleges that an industry in the United States exists as required by subsection (a)(2) of section 337. The complainant requests that the Commission institute an investigation and after the investigation, issue a permanent limited exclusion order and a permanent cease and desist order. ADDRESSES: The complaint and supplement, except for any confidential information contained therein, are available for inspection during official business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Room 112, Washington, DC 20436, telephone 202–205–2000. Hearing-impaired individuals are advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202– 205–1810. Persons with mobility impairments who will need special assistance in gaining access to the Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at 202–205–2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing the Internet server at https:// www.usitc.gov. The public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Scope of Investigation: Having considered the complaint, the U.S. International Trade Commission, on June 7, 2005, ordered that— (1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, an investigation be instituted to determine whether there is a violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of section 337 in the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, or the sale within the United States after importation of certain power supply controllers and products containing same by reason of infringement of claims 1, 2, 3, 6, 9, 17, 18, or 19 of U.S. Patent No. 6,212,079; claims 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 24, 28, or 29 of U.S. Patent No. 6,351,398; claims 8 or 12 of U.S. Patent No. 6,366,481; or claims 1, 4, 9–11, 13, 17, 19, 20, 22, 23, 26, 27, 30, 31, or 34 of U.S. Patent No. 6,538,908, and whether an industry in the United States exists as required by subsection (a)(2) of section 337. (2) For the purpose of the investigation so instituted, the following are hereby named as parties upon which this notice of investigation shall be served: (a) The complainant is—Power Integrations, Inc., 5245 Hellyer Avenue, San Jose, California 95138. (b) The respondent is the following company alleged to be in violation of section 337, and is the party upon which the complaint is to be served: System General Corporation, 8F, No. 205–3, Sec. 3, Beishin Road, Shindian City, Taipei, Taiwan. (c) Anne Goalwin, Esq., Office of Unfair Import Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Room 401–R, Washington, DC 20436, who shall be the Commission investigative attorney, party to this investigation; and (3) For the investigation so instituted, the Honorable Paul J. Luckern is designated as the presiding administrative law judge. Responses to the complaint and the notice of investigation must be submitted by the named respondents in accordance with § 210.13 of the commission’s Rules of Practice and AGENCY: PO 00000 Frm 00068 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\13JNN1.SGM 13JNN1 34150 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 112 / Monday, June 13, 2005 / Notices Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13. Pursuant to 19 CFR 201.16(d) and 210.13(a), such responses will be considered by the Commission if received no later than 20 days after the date of service by the Commission of the complaint and notice of investigation. Extensions of time for submitting responses to the complaint will not be granted unless good cause therefor is shown. Failure of a respondent to file a timely response to each allegation in the complaint and in this notice may be deemed to constitute a waiver of the right to appear and contest the allegations of the complaint and this notice, and to authorize the administrative law judge and the Commission, without further notice to the respondent, to find the facts to be as alleged in the complaint and this notice and to enter both an initial determination and a final determination containing such findings, and may result in the issuance of a limited exclusion order or a cease and desist order or both directed against such respondent. Issued: June 8, 2005. By order of the Commission. Marilyn R. Abbott, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. 05–11649 Filed 6–10–05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–M INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [USITC SE–05–024] Sunshine Act Meeting; Rescheduling of Commission Vote Agency Holding the Meeting: United States International Trade Commission. Original Date and Time: June 14, 2005 at 11 a.m. New Date and Time: June 21, 2005 at 2 p.m. Place: Room 101, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, Telephone: (202) 205–2000. Status: Open to the public. Matters To Be Considered: 1. Agenda for future meetings: none. 2. Minutes. 3. Ratification List. 4. Inv. Nos. 701–TA–381 and 382 and 731–TA–797–804 (Review)(Certain Stainless Steel Sheet and Strip from France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Korea, Mexico, Taiwan, and the United Kingdom)—briefing and vote. (The Commission is currently scheduled to transmit its determination and VerDate jul<14>2003 16:45 Jun 10, 2005 Jkt 205001 Commissioners’ opinions to the Secretary of Commerce on or before July 11, 2005.) 5. Outstanding action jackets: none. In accordance with 19 CFR 201.37, the Commission hereby gives notification of a change in the date of Commission vote in the above subject matter. Subject matter listed above, not disposed of at the scheduled meeting, may be carried over to the agenda of the following meeting. Earlier notice of this action was not possible. Issued: June 9, 2005. By order of the Commission: Marilyn R. Abbott, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. 05–11750 Filed 6–9–05; 3:10 pm] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Antitrust Division Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993; ControlNet International, Ltd. Notice is hereby given that, on May 18, 2005, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (‘‘the Act’’), ControlNet International, Ltd. (‘‘ControlNet’’) has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in its membership. The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act’s provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, Parker-Hannifin Corporation, Cleveland, OH has been added as a party to this venture. The following member has changed its name: Belden Wire & Cable to Belden CDT Electronics Division, Richmond, IN. No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned activity of the group research project. Membership in this group research project remains open, and ControlNet intends to file additional written notification disclosing all changes in membership. On February 3, 2005, ControlNet filed its original notification pursuant to Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice in the Federal Register pursuant to Section PO 00000 Frm 00069 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 6(b) of the Act on March 1, 2005 (70 FR 9979). Dorothy B. Fountain Deputy Director of Operations Antitrust Division [FR Doc. 05–11600 Filed 6–10–05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4410–11–M DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Antitrust Division Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993; Network Centric Operations Industry Consortium, Inc. Notice is hereby given that, on May 11, 2005, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (‘‘the Act’’), Network Centric Operations Industry Consortium, Inc. has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in its membership. The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act’s provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, West Virginia High Technology Consortium Foundation, Fairmont, WV; MBL International, Ltd., Annandale, VA; Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory, Laurel, MD; Ball Solutions Group Pty, Ltd., Barton, ACT, Australia; Camber Corporation, Huntsville, AL; EFW Incorporated, Fort Worth, TX; Terma A/ S, Lystrup, Denmark; EDISOFT S.A., Setubal, Portugal; Rheinmetall Defence Electronics GmbH, Bremen, Germany; SRI International, Menlo Park, CA; Intel Corporation, Santa Clara, CA; and Institute for Defense Analyses, Alexandria, VA have been added as parties to this venture. No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned activity of the group research project. Membership in this group research project remains open, and Network Centric Operations Industry Consortium, Inc. intends to file additional written notification disclosing all changes in membership. On November 19, 2004, Network Centric Operations Industry Consortium, Inc. filed its original notification pursuant to Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice in the Federal Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on February 2, 2005 (70 FR 5486). The last notification was filed with the Department on February 17, 2005. A E:\FR\FM\13JNN1.SGM 13JNN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 112 (Monday, June 13, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 34149-34150]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-11649]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Investigation No. 37-TA-541]


In the Matter of Certain Power Supply Controllers and Products 
Containing Same; Notice of Investigation

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.

ACTION:  Institution of investigation pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 1337.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that a complaint filed with the U.S. 
International Trade Commission on May 9, 2005 under section 337 of the 
Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, on behalf of Power 
Integrations, Inc. of San Jose, California. A supplement to the 
complaint was filed on May 24, 2005. The complaint, as supplemented, 
alleges violation of section 337 in the importation into the United 
States, the sale for importation, and the sale within the United States 
after importation of certain power supply controllers and products 
containing same by reason of infringement of claims 1, 2, 3, 6, 9, and 
17-19 of U.S. Patent No. 6,212,079; claims 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 24, 28, and 
29 of U.S. Patent No. 6,351,398; claims 8 and 12 of U.S. Patent No. 
6,366,481, and claims 1, 4, 9-11 13, 17, 19, 20, 22, 23, 26, 27, 30, 
31, and 34 of U.S. Patent No. 6,538,908. The complaint further alleges 
that an industry in the United States exists as required by subsection 
(a)(2) of section 337.
    The complainant requests that the Commission institute an 
investigation and after the investigation, issue a permanent limited 
exclusion order and a permanent cease and desist order.

ADDRESSES: The complaint and supplement, except for any confidential 
information contained therein, are available for inspection during 
official business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the 
Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Room 
112, Washington, DC 20436, telephone 202-205-2000. Hearing-impaired 
individuals are advised that information on this matter can be obtained 
by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal on 202-205-1810. Persons 
with mobility impairments who will need special assistance in gaining 
access to the Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at 
202-205-2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be 
obtained by accessing the Internet server at https://www.usitc.gov. The 
public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission's 
electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Anne Goodwin, Esq., Office of Unfair 
Import Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, telephone 
202-205-2574.

    Authority: The authority for institution of this investigation 
is contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 
and in section 210.10 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and 
Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10 (2003).
    Scope of Investigation: Having considered the complaint, the U.S. 
International Trade Commission, on June 7, 2005, ordered that--
    (1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 
1930, as amended, an investigation be instituted to determine whether 
there is a violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of section 337 in the 
importation into the United States, the sale for importation, or the 
sale within the United States after importation of certain power supply 
controllers and products containing same by reason of infringement of 
claims 1, 2, 3, 6, 9, 17, 18, or 19 of U.S. Patent No. 6,212,079; 
claims 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 24, 28, or 29 of U.S. Patent No. 6,351,398; 
claims 8 or 12 of U.S. Patent No. 6,366,481; or claims 1, 4, 9-11, 13, 
17, 19, 20, 22, 23, 26, 27, 30, 31, or 34 of U.S. Patent No. 6,538,908, 
and whether an industry in the United States exists as required by 
subsection (a)(2) of section 337.
    (2) For the purpose of the investigation so instituted, the 
following are hereby named as parties upon which this notice of 
investigation shall be served:
    (a) The complainant is--Power Integrations, Inc., 5245 Hellyer 
Avenue, San Jose, California 95138.
    (b) The respondent is the following company alleged to be in 
violation of section 337, and is the party upon which the complaint is 
to be served: System General Corporation, 8F, No. 205-3, Sec. 3, 
Beishin Road, Shindian City, Taipei, Taiwan.
    (c) Anne Goalwin, Esq., Office of Unfair Import Investigations, 
U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Room 401-R, 
Washington, DC 20436, who shall be the Commission investigative 
attorney, party to this investigation; and
    (3) For the investigation so instituted, the Honorable Paul J. 
Luckern is designated as the presiding administrative law judge.
    Responses to the complaint and the notice of investigation must be 
submitted by the named respondents in accordance with Sec.  210.13 of 
the commission's Rules of Practice and

[[Page 34150]]

Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13. Pursuant to 19 CFR 201.16(d) and 210.13(a), 
such responses will be considered by the Commission if received no 
later than 20 days after the date of service by the Commission of the 
complaint and notice of investigation. Extensions of time for 
submitting responses to the complaint will not be granted unless good 
cause therefor is shown.
    Failure of a respondent to file a timely response to each 
allegation in the complaint and in this notice may be deemed to 
constitute a waiver of the right to appear and contest the allegations 
of the complaint and this notice, and to authorize the administrative 
law judge and the Commission, without further notice to the respondent, 
to find the facts to be as alleged in the complaint and this notice and 
to enter both an initial determination and a final determination 
containing such findings, and may result in the issuance of a limited 
exclusion order or a cease and desist order or both directed against 
such respondent.

    Issued: June 8, 2005.
    By order of the Commission.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 05-11649 Filed 6-10-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-M
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.