Self-Regulatory Organizations; Pacific Exchange, Inc.; Notice of Filing and Order Granting Accelerated Approval to a Proposed Rule Change and Amendment Nos. 1, 2, 3, and 4 Thereto Relating to the Market Maker Risk Limitation Mechanism, 32686-32689 [E5-2830]
Download as PDF
32686
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 106 / Friday, June 3, 2005 / Notices
with the provisions of Section 19(b)(1)
of the Act.7
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s Internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an e-mail to rulecomments@sec.gov. Please include File
Number SR–OC–2005–01 on the subject
line.
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Jonathan G. Katz, Secretary,
Securities and Exchange Commission,
450 Fifth Street, NW., Washington, DC
20549–0609.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–OC–2005–01. This file
number should be included on the
subject line if e-mail is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for inspection and copying in
the Commission’s Public Reference
Section, 450 Fifth Street, NW.,
Washington, DC 20549–0609. Copies of
such filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal
office of OneChicago. All comments
received will be posted without change;
the Commission does not edit personal
identifying information from
submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make
available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR–OC–
2005–01 and should be submitted on or
before June 24, 2005.
7 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
VerDate jul<14>2003
18:03 Jun 02, 2005
Jkt 205001
For the Commission, by the Division of
Market Regulation, pursuant to delegated
authority.8
Margaret H. McFarland,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. E5–2833 Filed 6–2–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–51740; File No. SR–PCX–
2005–64]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Pacific
Exchange, Inc.; Notice of Filing and
Order Granting Accelerated Approval
to a Proposed Rule Change and
Amendment Nos. 1, 2, 3, and 4 Thereto
Relating to the Market Maker Risk
Limitation Mechanism
May 25, 2005.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on May 2,
2005, the Pacific Exchange, Inc. (‘‘PCX’’
or ‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission
(‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule
change as described in Items I and II
below, which Items have been prepared
by the Exchange. On May 19, 2005, the
PCX filed Amendment No. 1 to the
proposed rule change.3 On May 23,
2005 the PCX filed Amendment No. 2 to
the proposed rule change.4 On May 24,
2005 the PCX filed Amendment No. 3 to
the proposed rule change.5 On May 24,
2005 the PCX filed Amendment No. 4 to
the proposed rule change.6 The
Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule
change, as amended, from interested
persons. In addition, the Commission is
granting accelerated approval of the
proposed rule change, as amended.
CFR 200.30–3(a)(75).
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
3 In Amendment No. 1, the PCX (a) added
language to establish certain criteria regarding the
use of the Market Maker Risk Limitation
Mechanism and (b) added language to PCX Rule
6.37(g)(1), which governs quoting obligations of
Lead Market Makers (‘‘LMMs’’).
4 In Amendment No. 2, the PCX corrected certain
typographical errors in the rule text and amended
the proposed rule text of Rule 6.37(g)(1) to delete
an incorrect reference to proposed PCX Rule
6.40(e).
5 In Amendment No. 3, the PCX corrected certain
typographical errors in the rule text.
6 In Amendment No. 4, the PCX corrected certain
typographical errors in Amendment No. 2.
PO 00000
8 17
1 15
Frm 00123
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to adopt PCX
Rule 6.40 to provide PCX Market
Makers protection from the
unreasonable risk associated with an
excessive number of near simultaneous
executions in a single options class
through the implementation of a Market
Maker Risk Limitation Mechanism. The
text of the proposed rule change, as
amended, is below. Proposed new
language is in italics; proposed
deletions are in [brackets].
Rule 6
Market Maker Risk Limitation
Mechanism
Rule 6.40 [Reserved.] (a) Trade
Counter. The trading engine will
maintain a ‘‘trade counter’’ for each
Market Maker on each class to which
the Market Maker is appointed. This
trade counter will be incremented by
one every time the Market Maker
executes a trade on any series in the
appointed class. The trade counter will
automatically reset itself every ‘‘n’’
seconds.
(b) Market Maker Risk Limitation
Mechanism. The trading engine will
activate the Market Maker Risk
Limitation Mechanism on an appointed
class whenever the following conditions
are met: The trade counter has reached
‘‘n’’ executions against the quotes of the
Market Maker in the Market Maker’s
appointed class during a period of ‘‘n’’
seconds. When the above conditions are
met, the trading engine will
automatically cancel all quotes posted
by the Market Maker on that class by
generating a ‘‘bulk cancel’’ message.
(c) The bulk cancel message will be
processed in time priority with any
other quote or order message received
by the trading engine. Any orders or
quotes that matched with the Market
Maker’s quote and were received in the
trading engine prior to the receipt of the
bulk cancel message will be
automatically executed. Orders or
quotes received in the trading engine
after receipt of the bulk cancel message
will not be executed against the Market
Maker.
(d) Once the Market Maker Risk
Limitation Mechanism has been
activated for an options class, any bulk
quote messages sent by the Market
Maker on that class would continue to
be rejected until the Market Maker
submits a message to the trading engine
to enable new quotes.
(e) In the event that a Lead Market
Maker’s (‘‘LMM’’) quotes are cancelled
and there are no other Market Makers
E:\FR\FM\03JNN1.SGM
03JNN1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 106 / Friday, June 3, 2005 / Notices
quoting in the issue, the trading engine
will automatically provide two-sided
legal quotes on behalf of the LMM until
such time the LMM submits a message
to the trading engine to enable new
quotes. All quotes generated by the
Exchange on behalf of an LMM will be
considered ‘‘firm quotes’’ and shall be
the obligation of the LMM.
(f) Each Market Maker that is quoting
in an issue shall determine the
appropriate trade counter threshold of
‘‘n’’ executions and the time period of
‘‘n’’ seconds as described in paragraph
(b) above to activate the Market Maker
Risk Limitation Mechanism. The trade
counter threshold must be at least five
executions. The time period must be at
least 1⁄2 second. At no time may the
trade counter be set for a trade rate of
less than five executions in a one
second period.
(g) For purposes of this Rule 6.40, a
‘‘bulk quote’’ message is a single
message from a Market Maker that
simultaneously updates all of the
Market Maker’s quotes in multiple series
in a class at the same time.
Commentary:
.01 A trade rate of five executions in
a one second period will allow for
Market Makers to provide different risk
settings. Based on a minimum rate of
five executions per second, permissible
settings could be five executions in a
one second period, ten executions in a
two second period fifteen executions in
three a second period and so forth,
using the same minimum executions per
second ratio.
*
*
*
*
*
Obligations of Market Makers
Rule 6.37 (a)–(f) No change.
(g) Quoting Obligations of Market
Makers.
(1) Lead Market Makers. Lead Market
Makers must provide continuous twosided quotations throughout the trading
day in each of their appointed issues for
99% of the time the Exchange is open
for trading in each issue. Such
quotations must meet the legal quote
width requirements of Rule 6.37(b).
LMMs must also specify a size for each
of their quotations applicable to:
(A)–(B) No change.
*
*
*
*
*
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for
the proposed rule change and discussed
any comments it had received on the
VerDate jul<14>2003
18:03 Jun 02, 2005
Jkt 205001
proposed rule change. The text of these
statements may be examined at the
places specified in Item III below. The
PCX has prepared summaries, set forth
in Sections A, B, and C below, of the
most significant aspects of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
1. Purpose
The purpose of the proposed rule
change is to provide all PCX Market
Makers protection from the
unreasonable risk of multiple nearly
simultaneous executions. Like autoquote systems used on other options
exchanges, the primary method for
Market Makers to update their markets
on the PCX is to post and update quotes
on multiple series of options at the same
time through the use of ‘‘bulk quotes.’’
Generally, these quotes are based on the
Market Maker’s proprietary pricing
models that rely on various factors,
including the price of the underlying
security and that security’s market
volatility. As these variables change, a
Market Maker’s pricing model and
automated quote system will
continuously enter bulk quote updates
for all series in the class.
A PCX Market Maker’s risk is not
limited to the risk in a single series of
a particular class. Rather, a Market
Maker faces exposure in all series of a
class, requiring the Market Maker off set
or otherwise hedge its overall position
in a class. In addition to the Market
Maker’s own proprietary quoting
system, the Market Maker Risk
Limitation Mechanism would provide
an additional tool to manage the risk
associated with providing liquidity in a
large number of series across an options
class.
Because Market Makers provide
quotes in all series in a class, they are
exposed to the possibility of nearly
simultaneous multiple executions that
can create huge unintended principal
positions for the Market Makers and
expose them to unnecessary market risk.
Firm risk management procedures
dictate that Market Makers must take
into account the possibility of such
actions and the corresponding risk to
the Market Makers and the firm. As a
result, the PCX believes that Market
Makers widen their quotes, quote less
aggressively, and limit their quote size
in order to avoid such unintended
executions and the attendant risks and
costs involved, all to the detriment of
customers and other market
PO 00000
Frm 00124
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
32687
participants. The proposed rule
addresses these concerns.
Market Maker Risk Limitation
Mechanism
The Market Maker Risk Limitation
Mechanism feature on the PCX would
protect all PCX Market Makers from
excessive multiple and unintended
automatic executions. The Market
Maker Risk Limitation Mechanism
would begin with a ‘‘trade counter’’ for
each class where the Market Maker has
a market making appointment. This
trade counter would be incremented by
one every time the Market Maker
executes a trade on any series of the
assigned class. The trade counter would
reset itself every ‘‘n’’ seconds. The
individual Market Maker supplying the
quotes in a particular issue would
define the threshold number for the
trade counter to reach in order to trigger
the implementation of the Market Maker
Risk Limitation Mechanism. The
individual Market Maker supplying the
quotes in a particular issue would also
define the time period for the trade
counter to reset itself. The trade counter
would have a minimum setting of five
executions in a one second period.
Using a trade rate of five executions in
a one second period will allow for a
Market Maker to provide different risk
settings for different issue. This would
limit the number of consecutive
executions a given Market Maker could
have automatically executed on an
assigned class in a predefined period of
time.
Once the trade counter has reached
the defined threshold number, the
trading engine would automatically
cancel all quotes posted by that Market
Maker on that class by generating a bulk
cancel message. The bulk cancel
message would have the same time
priority as any other quote update or
order message the trading engine
receives, so that any orders or quotes
that matched with the Market Maker’s
quote and were received by the trading
engine prior to the receipt of the cancel
message would be automatically
executed pursuant to PCX rules. Orders
or quotes received by the trading engine
after receipt of the cancel message
would not be executed against the
Market Maker.
As soon as the Market Maker Risk
Limitation Mechanism is triggered, the
Market Maker would receive a message
to confirm the cancellation of the
Market Maker’s quotes on the given
class. The Market Maker could then
respond with an enabling message to the
trading engine to update or refresh
quotes. If there is no reply, PCX would
E:\FR\FM\03JNN1.SGM
03JNN1
32688
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 106 / Friday, June 3, 2005 / Notices
assume there is a communication or
system problem with the Market Maker.
In the event that a LMM is unable to
provide an updated quote, and there are
no other quotes in the PCX Plus system
for that issue, the trading engine will
create two sided, legal spread markets
on behalf of the LMM. Quotes generated
by the exchanges on behalf of the LMM
would be considered firm quotes and
would be the obligation of the LMM.
When there are other quotes in the PCX
system for that issue, the Exchange
would not generate quotes on behalf of
the LMM. Additionally, the Exchange
proposes to amend PCX Rule 6.37(g)(1)
to lower a LMM’s continuous quotation
obligation from 100% of the trading day
to 99% of the trading day. This is
designed to provide the LMM an
appropriate amount of time to replenish
quotes when the Exchange does not do
this on the LMM’s behalf. The Exchange
anticipates that this new proposed
functionality would be used in limited
circumstances and only for brief periods
of time.
The Market Maker Risk Limitation
Mechanism would protect both Market
Maker quotes currently posted and in
the PCX Consolidated Book, as well as
those incoming bulk quotes that a
Market Maker may erroneously generate
as part of an automatic update. For
example, a new bulk quote message
from a Market Maker that is
immediately executable across multiple
series would not generate a number of
executions greater than the defined
threshold number (i.e. would not allow
the Market Maker to unintentionally
sweep the book).
Without these protection
mechanisms, multiple unintentional
trades could automatically occur. These
executions would not properly reflect
the true nature of the market and would
subject Market Makers to unreasonable
market risk and multiple execution and
clearing fees, with no real economic
justification behind the trades. The
Exchange believes the proposed rule
change would reduce these
inefficiencies and risks by preventing a
PCX Market Maker from erroneously
trading automatically multiple times.
Under normal circumstances, PCX
Market Maker quotes do match and are
automatically executed; however, these
are usually only on a few series in a
class and involve immediate quote
updates after an execution. The trade
counter would not reach the threshold
level, nor would the Risk Limitation
Mechanism be activated under most
circumstances.
The Exchange believes these
protection mechanisms would eliminate
trades that are involuntary, the result of
VerDate jul<14>2003
18:03 Jun 02, 2005
Jkt 205001
technological error or inaccuracy, and
that impede certain liquidity providers’
ability to competitively quote. Also, the
Exchange believes the protection
mechanisms would increase the
liquidity available in the PCX market
and would enhance competition
because Market Makers would be better
able to quote large orders aggressively
and with fewer concerns over
technological breakdowns and system
inaccuracies.
These Market Maker protections do
not relieve a LMM or Market Maker’s
obligations pursuant to PCX Rule
6.37(g), which addresses a Market
Maker’s obligation to enter quotations
for the option classes to which it is
appointed, except as noted in proposed
change to PCX Rule 6.37(g)(1). In
addition, these Market Maker
protections do not relieve a LMM or
Market Maker’s obligations pursuant to
Rule 6.86 to provide firm quotations.
After a Market Maker protection has
been utilized, all other Market Makers
are expected to resume entering
quotations for the options classes to
which they are appointed as soon as
practicable.
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes the proposed
rule change is consistent with Section
6(b) of the Act,7 in general, and furthers
the objectives of Section 6(b)(5) of the
Act,8 in particular, in that it is designed
to facilitate transactions in securities, to
promote just and equitable principles of
trade, to enhance competition and to
protect investors and the public interest.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that
the proposed rule change, as amended,
would impose any burden on
competition that is not necessary or
appropriate in furtherance of the
purposes of the Act.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants, or Others
Written comments on the proposed
rule change were neither solicited nor
received.
III. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change, as amended, is consistent with
PO 00000
U.S.C. 78f(b).
8 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
Fmt 4703
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s Internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an e-mail to rulecomments@sec.gov. Please include File
Number SR–PCX–2005–64 on the
subject line.
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Jonathan G. Katz, Secretary,
Securities and Exchange Commission,
450 Fifth Street, NW., Washington, DC
20549–0609.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–PCX–2005–64. This file
number should be included on the
subject line if e-mail is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for inspection and copying in
the Commission’s Public Reference
Section, 450 Fifth Street, NW.,
Washington, DC 20549. Copies of such
filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal
office of the PCX. All comments
received will be posted without change;
the Commission does not edit personal
identifying information from
submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make
publicly available. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR–PCX–
2005–64 and should be submitted on or
before June 24, 2005.
IV. Commission’s Findings and Order
Granting Accelerated Approval of
Proposed Rule Change
After careful review, the Commission
finds that the proposed rule change, as
amended, is consistent with the
requirements of the Act and the rules
and regulations thereunder, applicable
to a national securities exchange.9 In
9 In approving this proposal, the Commission has
considered its impact on efficiency, competition,
and capital formation. 15 U.S.C. 78c(f).
7 15
Frm 00125
the Act. Comments may be submitted by
any of the following methods:
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\03JNN1.SGM
03JNN1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 106 / Friday, June 3, 2005 / Notices
particular, the Commission believes that
the proposed rule change is consistent
with Section 6(b)(5) of the Act,10 which
requires among other things, that the
rules of the Exchange are designed to
promote just and equitable principles of
trade, to remove impediments to and
perfect the mechanism of a free and
open market and a national market
system, and, in general, to protect
investors and the public interest. The
Commission notes that the proposal
does not alter the obligations of PCX
Market Makers, except for the fact that
it will reduce a LMM’s continuous
quoting obligation from 100% of the
trading day to 99% of the trading day
for each of its appointed classes. The
Commission notes that this reduction
should provide the LMM a brief amount
of time to update its quotes when the
Exchange does not generate quotes on
behalf of the LMM because no other
market makers are quoting. In addition,
the Commission believes that the
proposed rule change should provide
PCX Market Makers assistance in
effectively managing their quotations.
The PCX has requested that the
Commission find good cause for
approving the proposed rule change and
Amendment Nos. 1, 2, 3, and 4 thereto
prior to the thirtieth day after
publication of notice thereof in the
Federal Register. The Commission notes
that similar proposals to provide
protection from risk for market makers
have been approved for other options
exchanges.11 The Commission believes
that granting accelerated approval of the
proposal should provide PCX Market
Makers with similar protections from
the risk associated with an excessive
number of near simultaneous executions
in a single options class. Accordingly,
the Commission finds good cause,
pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the
Act,12 for approving the proposed rule
change, as amended, prior to the
thirtieth day after the date of
publication of notice thereof in the
Federal Register.
V. Conclusion
It is therefore ordered, pursuant to
Section 19(b)(2) of the Act,13 that the
proposed rule change (SR–PCX–2005–
64), and Amendment Nos. 1, 2, 3, and
4 thereto, are hereby approved on an
accelerated basis.
10 15
U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
Securities Exchange Act Release Nos.
51049 (January 28, 2005), 70 FR 3756 (January 26,
2005) (SR–BSE–2004–52); and 51050 (January 18,
2005), 70 FR 3758 (January 26, 2005) (SR–ISE–
2004–31).
12 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
13 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
11 See
VerDate jul<14>2003
18:03 Jun 02, 2005
Jkt 205001
For the Commission, by the Division of
Market Regulation, pursuant to delegated
authority.14
Margaret H. McFarland,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. E5–2830 Filed 6–2–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–51728; File No. SR–PCX–
2005–57]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Pacific
Exchange, Inc.; Notice of Filing and
Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed
Rule Change and Amendment No. 1
Thereto Relating To Delay of
Implementation Date of Revisions to
the Series 4 Examination Program
May 24, 2005.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on April 22,
2005, the Pacific Exchange, Inc. (‘‘PCX’’
or ‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission (‘‘SEC’’ or
‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule
change as described in Items I, II, and
III below, which Items have been
prepared by PCX. PCX has designated
the proposed rule change as one
constituting a stated policy, practice, or
interpretation with respect to the
meaning, administration, or
enforcement of an existing rule of PCX
pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)(i) of the
Act 3 and Rule 19b–4(f)(1) thereunder,4
which renders the proposal effective
upon filing with the Commission. The
Exchange filed Amendment No. 1 to the
proposed rule change on May 16, 2005.5
The Commission is publishing this
notice to solicit comments on the
proposed rule change, as amended, from
interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
Pursuant to the provisions of Section
19(b)(1) of the Act,6 the Exchange is
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
3 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(i).
4 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(1).
5 In Amendment No. 1, PCX provided a new
statutory basis for the proposed rule change and
made technical corrections to the proposed rule
change. For purposes of calculating the 60-day
period within which the Commission may
summarily abrogate the proposed rule change under
Section 19(b)(3)(C) of the Act, the Commission
considers the period to commence on May 16, 2005,
the date on which the Exchange filed Amendment
No. 1. See 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(C).
6 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
PO 00000
14 17
1 15
Frm 00126
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
32689
filing with the Commission a proposed
rule change to delay until no later than
November 30, 2005 the implementation
date of the recent revisions to the
Limited Principal—Registered Options
(Series 4) examination program,
including the study outline and
selection specifications (‘‘Series 4
Examination’’). PCX is not proposing
any textual changes to its rules.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission,
PCX included statements concerning the
purpose of and basis for the proposed
rule change and discussed any
comments it received on the proposed
rule change. The text of these statements
may be examined at the places specified
in Item IV below. PCX has prepared
summaries, set forth in sections A, B
and C below, of the most significant
aspects of such statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
1. Purpose
On April 12, 2005, PCX filed with the
SEC for immediate effectiveness
revisions to the Series 4 Examination.7
The Series 4 Examination is an
industry-wide examination that
qualifies an individual to function as a
Registered Options Principal. The Series
4 Examination is shared by PCX and the
following self-regulatory organizations:
the American Stock Exchange LLC
(‘‘Amex’’), the Chicago Board Options
Exchange, Incorporated, the National
Association of Securities Dealers, Inc.
(‘‘NASD’’), the New York Stock
Exchange, Inc., and the Philadelphia
Stock Exchange, Inc. Amex and NASD
filed with the SEC similar revisions to
the Series 4 Examination.8 PCX
intended to implement the Series 4
Examination revisions no later than
April 29, 2005 in order to be consistent
with NASD.9 However, due to
administrative issues, PCX is proposing
to delay until no later than November
30, 2005 the implementation date of the
revisions.
7 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 34–
51727 (May 24, 2005) (SR–PCX–2005–51).
8 See Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 51689
(May 12, 2005), 70 FR 28965 (May 19, 2005 (SRAmex-2005–039); and 51216 (February 16, 2005),
70 FR 8866 (February 23, 2005) (SR–NASD–2005–
025).
9 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 51216
(February 16, 2005), 70 FR 8866, 8867 (February 23,
2005), (SR–NASD–2005–025).
E:\FR\FM\03JNN1.SGM
03JNN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 106 (Friday, June 3, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 32686-32689]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E5-2830]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-51740; File No. SR-PCX-2005-64]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Pacific Exchange, Inc.; Notice of
Filing and Order Granting Accelerated Approval to a Proposed Rule
Change and Amendment Nos. 1, 2, 3, and 4 Thereto Relating to the Market
Maker Risk Limitation Mechanism
May 25, 2005.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on May 2, 2005, the Pacific Exchange, Inc. (``PCX'' or ``Exchange'')
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission'') the
proposed rule change as described in Items I and II below, which Items
have been prepared by the Exchange. On May 19, 2005, the PCX filed
Amendment No. 1 to the proposed rule change.\3\ On May 23, 2005 the PCX
filed Amendment No. 2 to the proposed rule change.\4\ On May 24, 2005
the PCX filed Amendment No. 3 to the proposed rule change.\5\ On May
24, 2005 the PCX filed Amendment No. 4 to the proposed rule change.\6\
The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the
proposed rule change, as amended, from interested persons. In addition,
the Commission is granting accelerated approval of the proposed rule
change, as amended.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
\3\ In Amendment No. 1, the PCX (a) added language to establish
certain criteria regarding the use of the Market Maker Risk
Limitation Mechanism and (b) added language to PCX Rule 6.37(g)(1),
which governs quoting obligations of Lead Market Makers (``LMMs'').
\4\ In Amendment No. 2, the PCX corrected certain typographical
errors in the rule text and amended the proposed rule text of Rule
6.37(g)(1) to delete an incorrect reference to proposed PCX Rule
6.40(e).
\5\ In Amendment No. 3, the PCX corrected certain typographical
errors in the rule text.
\6\ In Amendment No. 4, the PCX corrected certain typographical
errors in Amendment No. 2.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to adopt PCX Rule 6.40 to provide PCX Market
Makers protection from the unreasonable risk associated with an
excessive number of near simultaneous executions in a single options
class through the implementation of a Market Maker Risk Limitation
Mechanism. The text of the proposed rule change, as amended, is below.
Proposed new language is in italics; proposed deletions are in
[brackets].
Rule 6
Market Maker Risk Limitation Mechanism
Rule 6.40 [Reserved.] (a) Trade Counter. The trading engine will
maintain a ``trade counter'' for each Market Maker on each class to
which the Market Maker is appointed. This trade counter will be
incremented by one every time the Market Maker executes a trade on any
series in the appointed class. The trade counter will automatically
reset itself every ``n'' seconds.
(b) Market Maker Risk Limitation Mechanism. The trading engine will
activate the Market Maker Risk Limitation Mechanism on an appointed
class whenever the following conditions are met: The trade counter has
reached ``n'' executions against the quotes of the Market Maker in the
Market Maker's appointed class during a period of ``n'' seconds. When
the above conditions are met, the trading engine will automatically
cancel all quotes posted by the Market Maker on that class by
generating a ``bulk cancel'' message.
(c) The bulk cancel message will be processed in time priority with
any other quote or order message received by the trading engine. Any
orders or quotes that matched with the Market Maker's quote and were
received in the trading engine prior to the receipt of the bulk cancel
message will be automatically executed. Orders or quotes received in
the trading engine after receipt of the bulk cancel message will not be
executed against the Market Maker.
(d) Once the Market Maker Risk Limitation Mechanism has been
activated for an options class, any bulk quote messages sent by the
Market Maker on that class would continue to be rejected until the
Market Maker submits a message to the trading engine to enable new
quotes.
(e) In the event that a Lead Market Maker's (``LMM'') quotes are
cancelled and there are no other Market Makers
[[Page 32687]]
quoting in the issue, the trading engine will automatically provide
two-sided legal quotes on behalf of the LMM until such time the LMM
submits a message to the trading engine to enable new quotes. All
quotes generated by the Exchange on behalf of an LMM will be considered
``firm quotes'' and shall be the obligation of the LMM.
(f) Each Market Maker that is quoting in an issue shall determine
the appropriate trade counter threshold of ``n'' executions and the
time period of ``n'' seconds as described in paragraph (b) above to
activate the Market Maker Risk Limitation Mechanism. The trade counter
threshold must be at least five executions. The time period must be at
least \1/2\ second. At no time may the trade counter be set for a trade
rate of less than five executions in a one second period.
(g) For purposes of this Rule 6.40, a ``bulk quote'' message is a
single message from a Market Maker that simultaneously updates all of
the Market Maker's quotes in multiple series in a class at the same
time.
Commentary:
.01 A trade rate of five executions in a one second period will
allow for Market Makers to provide different risk settings. Based on a
minimum rate of five executions per second, permissible settings could
be five executions in a one second period, ten executions in a two
second period fifteen executions in three a second period and so forth,
using the same minimum executions per second ratio.
* * * * *
Obligations of Market Makers
Rule 6.37 (a)-(f) No change.
(g) Quoting Obligations of Market Makers.
(1) Lead Market Makers. Lead Market Makers must provide continuous
two-sided quotations throughout the trading day in each of their
appointed issues for 99% of the time the Exchange is open for trading
in each issue. Such quotations must meet the legal quote width
requirements of Rule 6.37(b). LMMs must also specify a size for each of
their quotations applicable to:
(A)-(B) No change.
* * * * *
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it had received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item III below. The PCX has prepared summaries, set forth in Sections
A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
1. Purpose
The purpose of the proposed rule change is to provide all PCX
Market Makers protection from the unreasonable risk of multiple nearly
simultaneous executions. Like auto-quote systems used on other options
exchanges, the primary method for Market Makers to update their markets
on the PCX is to post and update quotes on multiple series of options
at the same time through the use of ``bulk quotes.'' Generally, these
quotes are based on the Market Maker's proprietary pricing models that
rely on various factors, including the price of the underlying security
and that security's market volatility. As these variables change, a
Market Maker's pricing model and automated quote system will
continuously enter bulk quote updates for all series in the class.
A PCX Market Maker's risk is not limited to the risk in a single
series of a particular class. Rather, a Market Maker faces exposure in
all series of a class, requiring the Market Maker off set or otherwise
hedge its overall position in a class. In addition to the Market
Maker's own proprietary quoting system, the Market Maker Risk
Limitation Mechanism would provide an additional tool to manage the
risk associated with providing liquidity in a large number of series
across an options class.
Because Market Makers provide quotes in all series in a class, they
are exposed to the possibility of nearly simultaneous multiple
executions that can create huge unintended principal positions for the
Market Makers and expose them to unnecessary market risk. Firm risk
management procedures dictate that Market Makers must take into account
the possibility of such actions and the corresponding risk to the
Market Makers and the firm. As a result, the PCX believes that Market
Makers widen their quotes, quote less aggressively, and limit their
quote size in order to avoid such unintended executions and the
attendant risks and costs involved, all to the detriment of customers
and other market participants. The proposed rule addresses these
concerns.
Market Maker Risk Limitation Mechanism
The Market Maker Risk Limitation Mechanism feature on the PCX would
protect all PCX Market Makers from excessive multiple and unintended
automatic executions. The Market Maker Risk Limitation Mechanism would
begin with a ``trade counter'' for each class where the Market Maker
has a market making appointment. This trade counter would be
incremented by one every time the Market Maker executes a trade on any
series of the assigned class. The trade counter would reset itself
every ``n'' seconds. The individual Market Maker supplying the quotes
in a particular issue would define the threshold number for the trade
counter to reach in order to trigger the implementation of the Market
Maker Risk Limitation Mechanism. The individual Market Maker supplying
the quotes in a particular issue would also define the time period for
the trade counter to reset itself. The trade counter would have a
minimum setting of five executions in a one second period. Using a
trade rate of five executions in a one second period will allow for a
Market Maker to provide different risk settings for different issue.
This would limit the number of consecutive executions a given Market
Maker could have automatically executed on an assigned class in a
predefined period of time.
Once the trade counter has reached the defined threshold number,
the trading engine would automatically cancel all quotes posted by that
Market Maker on that class by generating a bulk cancel message. The
bulk cancel message would have the same time priority as any other
quote update or order message the trading engine receives, so that any
orders or quotes that matched with the Market Maker's quote and were
received by the trading engine prior to the receipt of the cancel
message would be automatically executed pursuant to PCX rules. Orders
or quotes received by the trading engine after receipt of the cancel
message would not be executed against the Market Maker.
As soon as the Market Maker Risk Limitation Mechanism is triggered,
the Market Maker would receive a message to confirm the cancellation of
the Market Maker's quotes on the given class. The Market Maker could
then respond with an enabling message to the trading engine to update
or refresh quotes. If there is no reply, PCX would
[[Page 32688]]
assume there is a communication or system problem with the Market
Maker.
In the event that a LMM is unable to provide an updated quote, and
there are no other quotes in the PCX Plus system for that issue, the
trading engine will create two sided, legal spread markets on behalf of
the LMM. Quotes generated by the exchanges on behalf of the LMM would
be considered firm quotes and would be the obligation of the LMM. When
there are other quotes in the PCX system for that issue, the Exchange
would not generate quotes on behalf of the LMM. Additionally, the
Exchange proposes to amend PCX Rule 6.37(g)(1) to lower a LMM's
continuous quotation obligation from 100% of the trading day to 99% of
the trading day. This is designed to provide the LMM an appropriate
amount of time to replenish quotes when the Exchange does not do this
on the LMM's behalf. The Exchange anticipates that this new proposed
functionality would be used in limited circumstances and only for brief
periods of time.
The Market Maker Risk Limitation Mechanism would protect both
Market Maker quotes currently posted and in the PCX Consolidated Book,
as well as those incoming bulk quotes that a Market Maker may
erroneously generate as part of an automatic update. For example, a new
bulk quote message from a Market Maker that is immediately executable
across multiple series would not generate a number of executions
greater than the defined threshold number (i.e. would not allow the
Market Maker to unintentionally sweep the book).
Without these protection mechanisms, multiple unintentional trades
could automatically occur. These executions would not properly reflect
the true nature of the market and would subject Market Makers to
unreasonable market risk and multiple execution and clearing fees, with
no real economic justification behind the trades. The Exchange believes
the proposed rule change would reduce these inefficiencies and risks by
preventing a PCX Market Maker from erroneously trading automatically
multiple times. Under normal circumstances, PCX Market Maker quotes do
match and are automatically executed; however, these are usually only
on a few series in a class and involve immediate quote updates after an
execution. The trade counter would not reach the threshold level, nor
would the Risk Limitation Mechanism be activated under most
circumstances.
The Exchange believes these protection mechanisms would eliminate
trades that are involuntary, the result of technological error or
inaccuracy, and that impede certain liquidity providers' ability to
competitively quote. Also, the Exchange believes the protection
mechanisms would increase the liquidity available in the PCX market and
would enhance competition because Market Makers would be better able to
quote large orders aggressively and with fewer concerns over
technological breakdowns and system inaccuracies.
These Market Maker protections do not relieve a LMM or Market
Maker's obligations pursuant to PCX Rule 6.37(g), which addresses a
Market Maker's obligation to enter quotations for the option classes to
which it is appointed, except as noted in proposed change to PCX Rule
6.37(g)(1). In addition, these Market Maker protections do not relieve
a LMM or Market Maker's obligations pursuant to Rule 6.86 to provide
firm quotations. After a Market Maker protection has been utilized, all
other Market Makers are expected to resume entering quotations for the
options classes to which they are appointed as soon as practicable.
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes the proposed rule change is consistent with
Section 6(b) of the Act,\7\ in general, and furthers the objectives of
Section 6(b)(5) of the Act,\8\ in particular, in that it is designed to
facilitate transactions in securities, to promote just and equitable
principles of trade, to enhance competition and to protect investors
and the public interest.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
\8\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change, as
amended, would impose any burden on competition that is not necessary
or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others
Written comments on the proposed rule change were neither solicited
nor received.
III. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change, as amended, is consistent with the Act. Comments may be
submitted by any of the following methods:
Electronic Comments
Use the Commission's Internet comment form (https://
www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
Send an e-mail to rule-comments@sec.gov. Please include
File Number SR-PCX-2005-64 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
Send paper comments in triplicate to Jonathan G. Katz,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 450 Fifth Street, NW.,
Washington, DC 20549-0609.
All submissions should refer to File Number SR-PCX-2005-64. This file
number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/rules/
sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for inspection and
copying in the Commission's Public Reference Section, 450 Fifth Street,
NW., Washington, DC 20549. Copies of such filing also will be available
for inspection and copying at the principal office of the PCX. All
comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does
not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish to make publicly available. All
submissions should refer to File Number SR-PCX-2005-64 and should be
submitted on or before June 24, 2005.
IV. Commission's Findings and Order Granting Accelerated Approval of
Proposed Rule Change
After careful review, the Commission finds that the proposed rule
change, as amended, is consistent with the requirements of the Act and
the rules and regulations thereunder, applicable to a national
securities exchange.\9\ In
[[Page 32689]]
particular, the Commission believes that the proposed rule change is
consistent with Section 6(b)(5) of the Act,\10\ which requires among
other things, that the rules of the Exchange are designed to promote
just and equitable principles of trade, to remove impediments to and
perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and a national market
system, and, in general, to protect investors and the public interest.
The Commission notes that the proposal does not alter the obligations
of PCX Market Makers, except for the fact that it will reduce a LMM's
continuous quoting obligation from 100% of the trading day to 99% of
the trading day for each of its appointed classes. The Commission notes
that this reduction should provide the LMM a brief amount of time to
update its quotes when the Exchange does not generate quotes on behalf
of the LMM because no other market makers are quoting. In addition, the
Commission believes that the proposed rule change should provide PCX
Market Makers assistance in effectively managing their quotations.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ In approving this proposal, the Commission has considered
its impact on efficiency, competition, and capital formation. 15
U.S.C. 78c(f).
\10\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The PCX has requested that the Commission find good cause for
approving the proposed rule change and Amendment Nos. 1, 2, 3, and 4
thereto prior to the thirtieth day after publication of notice thereof
in the Federal Register. The Commission notes that similar proposals to
provide protection from risk for market makers have been approved for
other options exchanges.\11\ The Commission believes that granting
accelerated approval of the proposal should provide PCX Market Makers
with similar protections from the risk associated with an excessive
number of near simultaneous executions in a single options class.
Accordingly, the Commission finds good cause, pursuant to Section
19(b)(2) of the Act,\12\ for approving the proposed rule change, as
amended, prior to the thirtieth day after the date of publication of
notice thereof in the Federal Register.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ See Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 51049 (January 28,
2005), 70 FR 3756 (January 26, 2005) (SR-BSE-2004-52); and 51050
(January 18, 2005), 70 FR 3758 (January 26, 2005) (SR-ISE-2004-31).
\12\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
V. Conclusion
It is therefore ordered, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the
Act,\13\ that the proposed rule change (SR-PCX-2005-64), and Amendment
Nos. 1, 2, 3, and 4 thereto, are hereby approved on an accelerated
basis.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\13\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
For the Commission, by the Division of Market Regulation,
pursuant to delegated authority.\14\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\14\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Margaret H. McFarland,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. E5-2830 Filed 6-2-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-P