Notice of Receipt of Petition for Decision That Nonconforming 2005 Smart Car Passion, Pulse, and Pure (Coupe and Cabriolet) Passenger Cars Are Eligible for Importation, 32701-32702 [05-11009]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 106 / Friday, June 3, 2005 / Notices DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION National Highway Traffic Safety Administration [Docket No. NHTSA–2005–21334] Notice of Receipt of Petition for Decision That Nonconforming 2005 Smart Car Passion, Pulse, and Pure (Coupe and Cabriolet) Passenger Cars Are Eligible for Importation National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, DOT ACTION: Notice of receipt of petition for decision that nonconforming 2005 Smart Car Passion, Pulse, and Pure (coupe and cabriolet) passenger cars are eligible for importation. AGENCY: SUMMARY: This document announces receipt by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) of a petition for a decision that 2005 Smart Car Passion, Pulse, and Pure (coupe and cabriolet) passenger cars that were not originally manufactured to comply with all applicable Federal motor vehicle safety standards are eligible for importation into the United States because they have safety features that comply with, or are capable of being altered to comply with, all such standards. The closing date for comments on the petition is July 5, 2005. ADDRESSES: Comments should refer to the docket number and notice number, and be submitted to: Docket Management, Room PL–401, 400 Seventh St., SW., Washington, DC 20590. [Docket hours are from 9 am to 5 pm]. Anyone is able to search the electronic form of all comments received into any of our dockets by the name of the individual submitting the comment (or signing the comment, if submitted on behalf of an association, business, labor union, etc.). You may review DOT’s complete Privacy Act Statement in the Federal Register published on April 11, 2000 (Volume 65, Number 70; Pages 19477–78) or you may visit https://dms.dot.gov. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Coleman Sachs, Office of Vehicle Safety Compliance, NHTSA (202–366–3151). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: DATES: Background Under 49 U.S.C. 30141(a)(1)(B), a motor vehicle that was not originally manufactured to conform to all applicable Federal motor vehicle safety standards, and has no substantially similar U.S.-certified counterpart, shall be refused admission into the United States unless NHTSA has decided that VerDate jul<14>2003 18:03 Jun 02, 2005 Jkt 205001 the motor vehicle has safety features that comply with, or are capable of being altered to comply with, all applicable Federal motor vehicle safety standards based on destructive test data or such other evidence as NHTSA decides to be adequate. Petitions for eligibility decisions may be submitted by either manufacturers or importers who have registered with NHTSA pursuant to 49 CFR Part 592. As specified in 49 CFR 593.7, NHTSA publishes notice in the Federal Register of each petition that it receives, and affords interested persons an opportunity to comment on the petition. At the close of the comment period, NHTSA decides, on the basis of the petition and any comments that it has received, whether the vehicle is eligible for importation. The agency then publishes this decision in the Federal Register. G&K Automotive Conversion, Inc. of Santa Ana, California (‘‘G&K’’) (Registered Importer 90–007) has petitioned NHTSA to decide whether nonconforming 2005 Smart Car Passion, Pulse, and Pure (coupe and cabriolet) passenger cars are eligible for importation into the United States. In its petition, G&K noted that NHTSA has granted import eligibility to 2002–2004 Smart Car Passion, Pulse, and Pure (coupe and cabriolet) passenger cars, that they claim are identical to the 2005 Smart Car Passion, Pulse, and Pure (coupe and cabriolet) passenger cars that are the subject of this petition. In their petition for the 2002–2004 vehicles the petitioner claimed that the vehicles were capable of being altered to comply with all applicable FMVSS (see NHTSA docket no. NHTSA–2003–1401). Because those vehicles were not manufactured for importation into and sale in the United States, and were not certified by their original manufacturer (Daimler Benz), as conforming to all applicable FMVSS, they cannot be categorized as ‘‘substantially similar’’ to the 2002–2004 versions for purposes of establishing import eligibility under 49 U.S.C. 30141(a)(1)(A). However, the petitioner seeks to rely on the data, views and arguments submitted as part of the 2002–2004 petition; proof of conformity information that the petitioner submitted for the first vehicle it conformed under the 2002–2004 vehicle eligibility decision; and upon the contention that the 2005 model vehicles differ from the 2002–2004 models only in that they were manufactured as 2005 model vehicles. G&K contends that nonconforming 2005 Smart Car Passion, Pulse, and Pure (coupe and cabriolet) passenger cars are eligible for importation under 49 U.S.C. PO 00000 Frm 00138 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 32701 30141(a)(1)(B) because they have safety features that comply with, or are capable of being altered to comply with, all applicable Federal motor vehicle safety standards. Specifically, the petitioner claims that 2005 Smart Car Passion, Pulse, and Pure (coupe and cabriolet) passenger cars have safety features that comply with Standard Nos. 103 Defrosting and Defogging Systems, 104 Windshield Wiping and Washing Systems, 106 Brake Hoses, 109 New Pneumatic Tires, 116 Brake Fluid, 118 Power Window Systems, 124 Accelerator Control Systems, 135 Passenger Car Brake Systems, 202 Head Restraints, 204 Steering Control Rearward Displacement, 205 Glazing Materials, 206 Door Locks and Door Retention Components, 207 Seating Systems, 210 Seat Belt Assembly Anchorages, 212 Windshield Retention, 216 Roof Crush Resistance, and 219 Windshield Zone Intrusion. Petitioner further contends that the vehicles are capable of being altered to meet the following standards, in the manner indicated: Standard No. 101 Controls and Displays: (a) inscription of the word ‘‘Brake’’ and a seat belt warning symbol on the dash; and (b) modification of the speedometer to read in miles per hour. Standard No. 102 Transmission Shift Lever Sequence: inscription of shift sequence markings on the instrument cluster. Standard No. 108 Lamps, Reflective Devices and Associated Equipment: (a) Replacement or modification of the headlamps; (b) installation of side markers; and (c) installation of turn signal lamps to meet the standard. The petition does not describe the headlamp modifications. G&K is claiming confidentiality with respect to some of these modifications. Standard No. 110 Tire Selection and Rims: installation of a tire information placard. Standard No. 111 Rearview Mirror: inscription of the required warning statement on the face of the passenger side rearview mirror. Standard No. 114 Theft Protection: modification of the key locking system, and installation of a supplemental key warning buzzer system to meet the requirements of this standard. The petition does not describe these modifications. G&K is claiming confidentiality with respect to these modifications. Standard No. 201 Occupant Protection in Interior Impact: replacement of interior components with components fabricated by, and available only through, G&K. The E:\FR\FM\03JNN1.SGM 03JNN1 32702 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 106 / Friday, June 3, 2005 / Notices petition does not describe these components or their manner of installation. G&K is claiming confidentiality with respect to these modifications. Standard No. 208 Occupant Crash Protection: installation of supplemental wiring and replacement of the driver’s seat belt buckle assembly to comply with the seat belt warning requirements of this standard. Standard No. 209 Seat Belt Assemblies: replacement of the driver’s seat belt buckle assembly with one that conforms to the requirements of Standards No. 208 and 209. Standard No. 214 Side Impact Protection: modification of the vehicles through the installation of components available only from G&K. The petition does not describe these modifications. G&K is claiming confidentiality with respect to these modifications. Standard No. 225 Child Restraint Anchorage Systems: installation of a tether anchorage behind the passenger seat on coupe models. Standard No. 301 Fuel System Integrity: modification of the vehicles’ fuel system through the installation of three components and associated attachment hardware available only from G&K. The petition does not describe these modifications. G&K is claiming confidentiality with respect to these modifications. Standard No. 302 Flammability of Interior Materials: treatment of interior materials and components covered by the standard with material available only from G&K. G&K is claiming confidentiality with respect to these modifications. The petitioner states that a vehicle identification number plate must be affixed to the vehicles to meet the requirements of 49 CFR Part 565. The petitioner further states that a certification label must be affixed to the driver’s doorjamb to meet the requirements of 49 CFR Part 567. Additionally, petitioner states components available only from G&K will be installed on the vehicle to comply with the Bumper Standard found in 49 CFR Part 581. The petition does not describe these modifications. G&K is claiming confidentiality with respect to these modifications. Interested persons are invited to submit comments on the petition described above. Comments should refer to the docket number and be submitted to: Docket Management, Room PL–401, 400 Seventh St., SW., Washington, DC 20590. [Docket hours are from 9 am to 5 pm]. It is requested but not required that 10 copies be submitted. All comments received before the close of business on the closing date indicated above will be considered, and will be available for examination in the docket at the above address both before and after that date. To the extent possible, comments filed after the closing date will also be considered. Notice of final action on the petition will be published in the Federal Register pursuant to the authority indicated below. Authority: 49 U.S.C. 30141(a)(1)(B) and (b)(1); 49 CFR 593.8; delegations of authority at 49 CFR 1.50 and 501.8. Harry Thompson, Chief, Vehicle Crash Avoidance Division, Office of Vehicle Safety Compliance. [FR Doc. 05–11009 Filed 6–2–05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4910–59–P DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration Office of Hazardous Materials Safety; Notice of Delays in Processing of Exemption Applications Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration, DOT. AGENCY: Application No. 13183–N 13188–N 13281–N 13295–N 13309–N 13266–N 13422–N 13314–N 13341–N 14037–N 14038–N 14010–N 13999–N 14008–N 13958–N ..................... ..................... ..................... ..................... ..................... ..................... ..................... ..................... ..................... ..................... ..................... ..................... ..................... ..................... ..................... VerDate jul<14>2003 List of Applications delayed more than 180 days. ACTION: SUMMARY: In accordance with the requirements of 49 U.S.C. 5117(c), PHMSA is publishing the following list of exemption applications that have been in process for 180 days or more. The reason(s) for delay and the expected completion date for action on each application is provided in association with each identified application. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Delmer Billings, Office of Hazardous Materials Exemptions and Approvals, Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, 400 Seventh Street, SW., Washington, DC 20590–0001, (202) 366–4535. Key to ‘‘Reason for Delay’’ 1. Awaiting additional information from applicant. 2. Extensive public comment under review. 3. Application is technically complex and is of significant impact or precedent-setting and requires extensive analysis. 4. Staff review delayed by other priority issues or volume of exemption applications. Meaning of Application Number Suffixes N—New application. M—Modification request. PM—Party to application with modification request. Issued in Washington, DC, on May 27, 2005. R. Ryan Posten, Exemptions Program Officer, Office of Hazardous Materials Safety Exemptions & Approvals. Reason for delay Applicant New Exemption Applications Becton Dickinson, Sandy, UT ....................................................................................... General Dynamics, Lincoln, NE .................................................................................... The Dow Chemical Company, Midland, MI .................................................................. Taylor-Wharton, Harrisburg, PA .................................................................................... OPW Engineered Systems, Lebanon, OH ................................................................... Luxfer Gas Cylinders, Riverside, CA ............................................................................ Puritan Bennett, Plainfield, IN ....................................................................................... Sunoco Inc., Philadelphia, PA ...................................................................................... National Propane Gas Association, Washington, DC .................................................. Air Products & Chemicals, Inc., Allentown, PA ............................................................ Dow Chemical Company, Midland, MI ......................................................................... Varsal, LLC, Warminster, PA ........................................................................................ Kompozit-Praha s.r.o., Dysina u Plzne, Czech Republic, CZ ...................................... Air Products & Chemicals, Inc., Allentown, PA ............................................................ Department of Defense, Fort Eustis, VA ...................................................................... 18:03 Jun 02, 2005 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00139 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\03JNN1.SGM 03JNN1 Estimated date of completion 4 4 4 4 4 4 3 4 1 4 1 4 4 4 1 06–30–2005 06–30–2005 06–30–2005 06–30–2005 06–30–2005 06–30–2005 06–30–2005 06–30–2005 06–30–2005 06–30–2005 06–30–2005 06–30–2005 06–30–2005 06–30–2005 06–30–2005

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 106 (Friday, June 3, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 32701-32702]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-11009]



[[Page 32701]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration

[Docket No. NHTSA-2005-21334]


Notice of Receipt of Petition for Decision That Nonconforming 
2005 Smart Car Passion, Pulse, and Pure (Coupe and Cabriolet) Passenger 
Cars Are Eligible for Importation

AGENCY: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, DOT

ACTION: Notice of receipt of petition for decision that nonconforming 
2005 Smart Car Passion, Pulse, and Pure (coupe and cabriolet) passenger 
cars are eligible for importation.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document announces receipt by the National Highway 
Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) of a petition for a decision that 
2005 Smart Car Passion, Pulse, and Pure (coupe and cabriolet) passenger 
cars that were not originally manufactured to comply with all 
applicable Federal motor vehicle safety standards are eligible for 
importation into the United States because they have safety features 
that comply with, or are capable of being altered to comply with, all 
such standards.

DATES: The closing date for comments on the petition is July 5, 2005.

ADDRESSES: Comments should refer to the docket number and notice 
number, and be submitted to: Docket Management, Room PL-401, 400 
Seventh St., SW., Washington, DC 20590. [Docket hours are from 9 am to 
5 pm]. Anyone is able to search the electronic form of all comments 
received into any of our dockets by the name of the individual 
submitting the comment (or signing the comment, if submitted on behalf 
of an association, business, labor union, etc.). You may review DOT's 
complete Privacy Act Statement in the Federal Register published on 
April 11, 2000 (Volume 65, Number 70; Pages 19477-78) or you may visit 
https://dms.dot.gov.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Coleman Sachs, Office of Vehicle 
Safety Compliance, NHTSA (202-366-3151).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    Under 49 U.S.C. 30141(a)(1)(B), a motor vehicle that was not 
originally manufactured to conform to all applicable Federal motor 
vehicle safety standards, and has no substantially similar U.S.-
certified counterpart, shall be refused admission into the United 
States unless NHTSA has decided that the motor vehicle has safety 
features that comply with, or are capable of being altered to comply 
with, all applicable Federal motor vehicle safety standards based on 
destructive test data or such other evidence as NHTSA decides to be 
adequate.
    Petitions for eligibility decisions may be submitted by either 
manufacturers or importers who have registered with NHTSA pursuant to 
49 CFR Part 592. As specified in 49 CFR 593.7, NHTSA publishes notice 
in the Federal Register of each petition that it receives, and affords 
interested persons an opportunity to comment on the petition. At the 
close of the comment period, NHTSA decides, on the basis of the 
petition and any comments that it has received, whether the vehicle is 
eligible for importation. The agency then publishes this decision in 
the Federal Register.
    G&K Automotive Conversion, Inc. of Santa Ana, California (``G&K'') 
(Registered Importer 90-007) has petitioned NHTSA to decide whether 
nonconforming 2005 Smart Car Passion, Pulse, and Pure (coupe and 
cabriolet) passenger cars are eligible for importation into the United 
States. In its petition, G&K noted that NHTSA has granted import 
eligibility to 2002-2004 Smart Car Passion, Pulse, and Pure (coupe and 
cabriolet) passenger cars, that they claim are identical to the 2005 
Smart Car Passion, Pulse, and Pure (coupe and cabriolet) passenger cars 
that are the subject of this petition. In their petition for the 2002-
2004 vehicles the petitioner claimed that the vehicles were capable of 
being altered to comply with all applicable FMVSS (see NHTSA docket no. 
NHTSA-2003-1401). Because those vehicles were not manufactured for 
importation into and sale in the United States, and were not certified 
by their original manufacturer (Daimler Benz), as conforming to all 
applicable FMVSS, they cannot be categorized as ``substantially 
similar'' to the 2002-2004 versions for purposes of establishing import 
eligibility under 49 U.S.C. 30141(a)(1)(A). However, the petitioner 
seeks to rely on the data, views and arguments submitted as part of the 
2002-2004 petition; proof of conformity information that the petitioner 
submitted for the first vehicle it conformed under the 2002-2004 
vehicle eligibility decision; and upon the contention that the 2005 
model vehicles differ from the 2002-2004 models only in that they were 
manufactured as 2005 model vehicles.
    G&K contends that nonconforming 2005 Smart Car Passion, Pulse, and 
Pure (coupe and cabriolet) passenger cars are eligible for importation 
under 49 U.S.C. 30141(a)(1)(B) because they have safety features that 
comply with, or are capable of being altered to comply with, all 
applicable Federal motor vehicle safety standards.
    Specifically, the petitioner claims that 2005 Smart Car Passion, 
Pulse, and Pure (coupe and cabriolet) passenger cars have safety 
features that comply with Standard Nos. 103 Defrosting and Defogging 
Systems, 104 Windshield Wiping and Washing Systems, 106 Brake Hoses, 
109 New Pneumatic Tires, 116 Brake Fluid, 118 Power Window Systems, 124 
Accelerator Control Systems, 135 Passenger Car Brake Systems, 202 Head 
Restraints, 204 Steering Control Rearward Displacement, 205 Glazing 
Materials, 206 Door Locks and Door Retention Components, 207 Seating 
Systems, 210 Seat Belt Assembly Anchorages, 212 Windshield Retention, 
216 Roof Crush Resistance, and 219 Windshield Zone Intrusion.
    Petitioner further contends that the vehicles are capable of being 
altered to meet the following standards, in the manner indicated:
    Standard No. 101 Controls and Displays: (a) inscription of the word 
``Brake'' and a seat belt warning symbol on the dash; and (b) 
modification of the speedometer to read in miles per hour.
    Standard No. 102 Transmission Shift Lever Sequence: inscription of 
shift sequence markings on the instrument cluster.
    Standard No. 108 Lamps, Reflective Devices and Associated 
Equipment: (a) Replacement or modification of the headlamps; (b) 
installation of side markers; and (c) installation of turn signal lamps 
to meet the standard. The petition does not describe the headlamp 
modifications. G&K is claiming confidentiality with respect to some of 
these modifications.
    Standard No. 110 Tire Selection and Rims: installation of a tire 
information placard.
    Standard No. 111 Rearview Mirror: inscription of the required 
warning statement on the face of the passenger side rearview mirror.
    Standard No. 114 Theft Protection: modification of the key locking 
system, and installation of a supplemental key warning buzzer system to 
meet the requirements of this standard. The petition does not describe 
these modifications. G&K is claiming confidentiality with respect to 
these modifications.
    Standard No. 201 Occupant Protection in Interior Impact: 
replacement of interior components with components fabricated by, and 
available only through, G&K. The

[[Page 32702]]

petition does not describe these components or their manner of 
installation. G&K is claiming confidentiality with respect to these 
modifications.
    Standard No. 208 Occupant Crash Protection: installation of 
supplemental wiring and replacement of the driver's seat belt buckle 
assembly to comply with the seat belt warning requirements of this 
standard.
    Standard No. 209 Seat Belt Assemblies: replacement of the driver's 
seat belt buckle assembly with one that conforms to the requirements of 
Standards No. 208 and 209.
    Standard No. 214 Side Impact Protection: modification of the 
vehicles through the installation of components available only from 
G&K. The petition does not describe these modifications. G&K is 
claiming confidentiality with respect to these modifications.
    Standard No. 225 Child Restraint Anchorage Systems: installation of 
a tether anchorage behind the passenger seat on coupe models.
    Standard No. 301 Fuel System Integrity: modification of the 
vehicles' fuel system through the installation of three components and 
associated attachment hardware available only from G&K. The petition 
does not describe these modifications. G&K is claiming confidentiality 
with respect to these modifications.
    Standard No. 302 Flammability of Interior Materials: treatment of 
interior materials and components covered by the standard with material 
available only from G&K. G&K is claiming confidentiality with respect 
to these modifications.
    The petitioner states that a vehicle identification number plate 
must be affixed to the vehicles to meet the requirements of 49 CFR Part 
565. The petitioner further states that a certification label must be 
affixed to the driver's doorjamb to meet the requirements of 49 CFR 
Part 567.
    Additionally, petitioner states components available only from G&K 
will be installed on the vehicle to comply with the Bumper Standard 
found in 49 CFR Part 581. The petition does not describe these 
modifications. G&K is claiming confidentiality with respect to these 
modifications.
    Interested persons are invited to submit comments on the petition 
described above. Comments should refer to the docket number and be 
submitted to: Docket Management, Room PL-401, 400 Seventh St., SW., 
Washington, DC 20590. [Docket hours are from 9 am to 5 pm]. It is 
requested but not required that 10 copies be submitted.
    All comments received before the close of business on the closing 
date indicated above will be considered, and will be available for 
examination in the docket at the above address both before and after 
that date. To the extent possible, comments filed after the closing 
date will also be considered. Notice of final action on the petition 
will be published in the Federal Register pursuant to the authority 
indicated below.

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 30141(a)(1)(B) and (b)(1); 49 CFR 593.8; 
delegations of authority at 49 CFR 1.50 and 501.8.

Harry Thompson,
Chief, Vehicle Crash Avoidance Division, Office of Vehicle Safety 
Compliance.
[FR Doc. 05-11009 Filed 6-2-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-59-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.