Slings; Extension of the Office of Management and Budget's (OMB) Approval of Information Collection (Paperwork) Requirements, 30488-30489 [05-10564]
Download as PDF
30488
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 101 / Thursday, May 26, 2005 / Notices
TAA INSTITUTIONS—Continued
[Petitions instituted between 05/02/2005 and 05/06/2005]
Subject firm
(petitioners)
Location
Contact person
Telephone
Zomax, Inc. (State) .........................
Fremont, CA ....................
Jan Buchholz ...................
510–492–5145
[FR Doc. 05–10547 Filed 5–25–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–30–M
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Occupational Safety and Health
Administration
[Docket No. ICR 1218–0223(2005)]
Slings; Extension of the Office of
Management and Budget’s (OMB)
Approval of Information Collection
(Paperwork) Requirements
Occupational Safety and Health
Administration (OSHA), Labor.
ACTION: Request for public comment.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: OSHA solicits public
comment concerning its request for an
extension of the information collection
requirements contained in its Standard
on Slings (29 CFR 1910.184).
DATES: Comments must be submitted by
the following dates:
Hard copy: Your comments must be
submitted (postmarked or received) by
July 25, 2005.
Facsimile and electronic
transmission: Your comments must be
received by July 25, 2005.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by OSHA Docket No. ICR–
1218–0223(2005), by any of the
following methods:
Regular mail, express delivery, hand
delivery, and messenger service: Submit
your comments and attachments to the
OSHA Docket Office, Room N–2625,
U.S. Department of Labor, 200
Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington,
DC 20210; telephone (202) 693–2350
(OSHA’s TTY number is (877) 889–
5627). OSHA Docket Office and
Department of Labor hours are 8:15 a.m.
to 4:45 p.m., ET.
Facsimile: If your comments are 10
pages or fewer in length, including
attachments, you may fax them to the
OSHA Docket Office at (202) 693–1648.
Electronic: You may submit
comments through the Internet at
https://ecomments.osha.gov. Follow
instructions on the OSHA Web page for
submitting comments.
Docket: For access to the docket to
read or download comments or
background materials, such as the
complete Information Collection
VerDate jul<14>2003
19:11 May 25, 2005
Jkt 205001
Request (ICR) (containing the
Supporting Statement, OMB–83–I Form,
and attachments), go to OSHA’s Web
page at https://www.OSHA.gov. In
addition, the ICR, comments and
submissions are available for inspection
and copying at the OSHA Docket Office
at the address above. You also may
contact Theda Kenney at the address
below to obtain a copy of the ICR. For
additional information on submitting
comments, please see the ‘‘Public
Participation’’ heading in the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of
this document.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Theda Kenney or Todd Owen,
Directorate of Standards and Guidance,
OSHA, Room N–3609, 200 Constitution
Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20210,
telephone: (202) 693–2222.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
The Department of Labor, as part of its
continuing effort to reduce paperwork
and respondent (i.e., employer) burden,
conducts a preclearance consultation
program to provide the public with an
opportunity to comment on proposed
and continuing information collection
requirements in accordance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(PRA–95) (44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A)).
This program ensures that
information is in the desired format,
reporting burden (time and costs) is
minimal, collection instruments are
clearly understood, and OSHA’s
estimate of the information collection
burden is accurate. The Occupational
Safety and Health Act of 1970 (the Act)
(29 U.S.C. 652 et seq.) authorizes
information collection by employers as
necessary or appropriate for
enforcement of the Act or for developing
information regarding the causes and
prevention of occupational injuries,
illnesses, and accidents (29 U.S.C. 657).
The Slings Standard (29 CFR
1910.184) specifies several collection of
information (paperwork) requirements,
depending on the type of sling. The
purpose of each of these requirements is
to prevent employees from using
defective or deteriorated slings, thereby
reducing their risk of death or serious
injury caused by sling failure during
material handling.
PO 00000
Frm 00079
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
TA–W No.
57,134
Date of
institution
05/06/2005
Paragraph (e) of the Standard covers
alloy steel chain slings. Paragraph (e)(1)
requires that alloy steel chain slings
have permanently affixed and durable
identification stating the size, grade,
rated capacity, and reach of the sling.
The information, supplied by the
manufacturer, is typically marked on a
metal tag and affixed to the sling.
Paragraph (e)(3)(i) requires the
employer to make a thorough periodic
inspection of alloy steel chain slings in
use on a regular basis, but at least once
a year. Paragraph (e)(3)(ii) requires the
employer to make and maintain a record
of the most recent month in which each
alloy steel chain sling was thoroughly
inspected, and make this record
available for examination.
Paragraph (e)(4) requires the employer
to retain certificates of proof testing.
Employers must ensure that before use,
each new, repaired, or reconditioned
alloy steel chain sling, including all
welded components in the sling
assembly, has been proof tested by the
sling manufacturer or an equivalent
entity. The certificates of proof testing
must be retained by the employer and
made available for examination.
Paragraph (f) of the Standard covers
wire rope slings. Paragraph (f)(4)(ii)
requires that all welded end
attachments of wire rope slings be proof
tested by the manufacturer at twice their
rated capacity prior to initial use, and
that the employer retain a certificate of
the proof test and make it available for
examination.
Paragraph (g) of the Standard covers
metal mesh slings. Paragraph (g)(1)
requires each metal mesh sling to have
a durable marking permanently affixed
that states the rated capacity for vertical
basket hitch and choker hitch loadings.
Paragraph (g)(8)(ii) requires that once
repaired, each metal mesh sling be
permanently marked or tagged, or a
written record maintained to indicate
the date and type of the repairs made,
and the person or organization that
performed the repairs. Records of the
repairs shall be made available for
examination.
Paragraph (i) of the Standard covers
synthetic web slings. Paragraph (i)(1)
requires that synthetic web slings be
marked or coded to show the rated
capacities for each type of hitch, and
E:\FR\FM\26MYN1.SGM
26MYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 101 / Thursday, May 26, 2005 / Notices
type of synthetic web material used in
the sling.
Paragraph (i)(8)(i) prohibits the use of
repaired synthetic web slings until they
have been proof tested by the
manufacturer or equivalent entity.
Paragraph (i)(8)(ii) requires the
employer to retain a certificate of the
proof test and make it available for
examination.
The information on the identification
tags, markings, and codings assist the
employer in determining whether the
sling can be used for the lifting task. The
sling inspections enable early detection
of faulty slings. The inspection and
repair records provide employers with
information about when the last
inspection was made and about the type
of the repairs made. This information
provides some assurance about the
condition of the slings. These records
also provide the most efficient means
for an OSHA compliance officer to
determine that an employer is
complying with the Standard. Prooftesting certificates give employers,
employees, and OSHA compliance
officers assurance that slings are safe to
use. The certificates also provide the
compliance officers with an efficient
means to assess employer compliance
with the Standard.
II. Special Issues for Comment
OSHA has a particular interest in
comments on the following issues:
• Whether the proposed information
collection requirements are necessary
for the proper performance of the
Agency’s functions, including whether
the information is useful;
• The accuracy of OSHA’s estimate of
the burden (time and costs) of the
information collection requirements,
including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used;
• The quality, utility, and clarity of
the information collected; and
• Ways to minimize the burden on
employees who must comply; for
example, by using automated or other
technological information collection
and transmission techniques.
III. Proposed Actions
OSHA proposes to extend the Office
of Management and Budget’s (OMB)
approval of the collection of information
(paperwork) requirements necessitated
by the Standard on Slings (29 CFR
1910.184). In its extension request,
OSHA also is proposing to reduce the
total burden hours for these
requirements from 21,517 hours to
19,167 hours. The Agency will include
this summary in its request to OMB to
extend the approval of the collection of
information requirements.
VerDate jul<14>2003
19:11 May 25, 2005
Jkt 205001
Type of Review: Extension of
currently approved information
collection requirements.
Title: Slings (29 CFR 1910.184).
OMB Number: 1218–0223.
Affected Public: Business or other forprofits; Not-for-profit organizations;
Federal Government; State, local, or
tribal government.
Number of respondents: 65,000.
Frequency of Response: On occasion
annually;
Average Time per Response: Varies
from 1 minute (.02 hour) to maintain a
certificate to 30 minutes (.50 hour) for
a manufacturing worker to acquire
information from a manufacturer for a
new tag, make a new tag, and affix it to
a sling.
Estimated Total Burden Hours:
19,167.
Estimated Cost (Operation and
Maintenance): $0.
IV. Public Participation—Submission of
Comments on This Notice and Internet
Access to Comments and Submissions
You may submit comments and
supporting materials in response to this
notice by (1) hard copy, (2) fax
transmission (facsimile), or (3)
electronically through the OSHA Web
page. Because of security-related
problems, a significant delay may occur
in the receipt of comments by regular
mail. Please contact the OSHA Docket
Office at (202) 693–2350 (TTY (877)
889–5627) for information about
security procedures concerning the
delivery of submissions by express
delivery, hand delivery, and courier
service.
All comments, submissions and
background documents are available for
inspection and copying at the OSHA
Docket Office at the above address.
Comments and submissions posted on
OSHA’s Web page are available at
https://www.OSHA.gov. Contact the
OSHA Docket Office for information
about materials not available through
the OSHA Web page and for assistance
using the Web page to locate docket
submissions.
Electronic copies of this Federal
Register notice as well as other relevant
documents are available on OSHA’s
Web page. Since all submissions
become public, private information such
as social security numbers should not be
submitted.
V. Authority and Signature
Jonathan L. Snare, Acting Assistance
Secretary of Labor for Occupational
Safety and Health, directed the
preparation of this notice. The authority
for this notice is the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3506
PO 00000
Frm 00080
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
30489
et seq.), and Secretary of Labor’s Order
No. 5–2002 (67 FR 65008).
Signed at Washington, DC, on May 20,
2005.
Jonathan L. Snare,
Acting Assistant Secretary of Labor.
[FR Doc. 05–10564 Filed 5–25–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–26–M
NATIONAL CREDIT UNION
ADMINISTRATION
Sales of Nondeposit Investments
National Credit Union
Administration (NCUA).
ACTION: Proposed Interpretive Ruling
and Policy Statement No. 05–1; with
request for comments.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The NCUA is proposing to
adopt an Interpretive Ruling and Policy
Statement (IRPS) on Sales of Nondeposit
Investments. The proposed IRPS
provides requirements, direction, and
guidance to federally-insured credit
unions on the establishment and
operation of third party brokerage
arrangements. The proposed IRPS
updates and replaces NCUA’s Letter to
Credit Unions No. 150 on the sales of
nondeposit investments.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before July 25, 2005.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
by any of the following methods (please
send comments by one method only):
• NCUA Web site: https://
www.ncua.gov/news/proposed_regs/
proposed_regs.html. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• E-mail: Address to
regcomments@ncua.gov. Include ‘‘[Your
name] Comments on Proposed IRPS
(Sales of Nondeposit Investments)’’ in
the e-mail subject line.
• Fax: (703) 518–6319. Use the
subject line described above for e-mail.
• Mail: Address to Mary Rupp,
Secretary of the Board, National Credit
Union Administration, 1775 Duke
Street, Alexandria, Virginia 22314–
3428.
• Hand Delivery/Courier: Same as
mail address.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Paul
Peterson, Staff Attorney, Office of
General Counsel, at the above address or
telephone: (703) 518–6540.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
A. Introduction
The NCUA Board is proposing to
replace its Letter to Credit Unions No.
150 that contains NCUA’s current
guidance on the sale of nondeposit
investments. NCUA issued Letter No.
E:\FR\FM\26MYN1.SGM
26MYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 101 (Thursday, May 26, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 30488-30489]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-10564]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Occupational Safety and Health Administration
[Docket No. ICR 1218-0223(2005)]
Slings; Extension of the Office of Management and Budget's (OMB)
Approval of Information Collection (Paperwork) Requirements
AGENCY: Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), Labor.
ACTION: Request for public comment.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: OSHA solicits public comment concerning its request for an
extension of the information collection requirements contained in its
Standard on Slings (29 CFR 1910.184).
DATES: Comments must be submitted by the following dates:
Hard copy: Your comments must be submitted (postmarked or received)
by July 25, 2005.
Facsimile and electronic transmission: Your comments must be
received by July 25, 2005.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by OSHA Docket No. ICR-
1218-0223(2005), by any of the following methods:
Regular mail, express delivery, hand delivery, and messenger
service: Submit your comments and attachments to the OSHA Docket
Office, Room N-2625, U.S. Department of Labor, 200 Constitution Avenue,
NW., Washington, DC 20210; telephone (202) 693-2350 (OSHA's TTY number
is (877) 889-5627). OSHA Docket Office and Department of Labor hours
are 8:15 a.m. to 4:45 p.m., ET.
Facsimile: If your comments are 10 pages or fewer in length,
including attachments, you may fax them to the OSHA Docket Office at
(202) 693-1648.
Electronic: You may submit comments through the Internet at https://
ecomments.osha.gov. Follow instructions on the OSHA Web page for
submitting comments.
Docket: For access to the docket to read or download comments or
background materials, such as the complete Information Collection
Request (ICR) (containing the Supporting Statement, OMB-83-I Form, and
attachments), go to OSHA's Web page at https://www.OSHA.gov. In
addition, the ICR, comments and submissions are available for
inspection and copying at the OSHA Docket Office at the address above.
You also may contact Theda Kenney at the address below to obtain a copy
of the ICR. For additional information on submitting comments, please
see the ``Public Participation'' heading in the SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION section of this document.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Theda Kenney or Todd Owen, Directorate
of Standards and Guidance, OSHA, Room N-3609, 200 Constitution Avenue,
NW., Washington, DC 20210, telephone: (202) 693-2222.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
The Department of Labor, as part of its continuing effort to reduce
paperwork and respondent (i.e., employer) burden, conducts a
preclearance consultation program to provide the public with an
opportunity to comment on proposed and continuing information
collection requirements in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act
of 1995 (PRA-95) (44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A)).
This program ensures that information is in the desired format,
reporting burden (time and costs) is minimal, collection instruments
are clearly understood, and OSHA's estimate of the information
collection burden is accurate. The Occupational Safety and Health Act
of 1970 (the Act) (29 U.S.C. 652 et seq.) authorizes information
collection by employers as necessary or appropriate for enforcement of
the Act or for developing information regarding the causes and
prevention of occupational injuries, illnesses, and accidents (29
U.S.C. 657).
The Slings Standard (29 CFR 1910.184) specifies several collection
of information (paperwork) requirements, depending on the type of
sling. The purpose of each of these requirements is to prevent
employees from using defective or deteriorated slings, thereby reducing
their risk of death or serious injury caused by sling failure during
material handling.
Paragraph (e) of the Standard covers alloy steel chain slings.
Paragraph (e)(1) requires that alloy steel chain slings have
permanently affixed and durable identification stating the size, grade,
rated capacity, and reach of the sling. The information, supplied by
the manufacturer, is typically marked on a metal tag and affixed to the
sling.
Paragraph (e)(3)(i) requires the employer to make a thorough
periodic inspection of alloy steel chain slings in use on a regular
basis, but at least once a year. Paragraph (e)(3)(ii) requires the
employer to make and maintain a record of the most recent month in
which each alloy steel chain sling was thoroughly inspected, and make
this record available for examination.
Paragraph (e)(4) requires the employer to retain certificates of
proof testing. Employers must ensure that before use, each new,
repaired, or reconditioned alloy steel chain sling, including all
welded components in the sling assembly, has been proof tested by the
sling manufacturer or an equivalent entity. The certificates of proof
testing must be retained by the employer and made available for
examination.
Paragraph (f) of the Standard covers wire rope slings. Paragraph
(f)(4)(ii) requires that all welded end attachments of wire rope slings
be proof tested by the manufacturer at twice their rated capacity prior
to initial use, and that the employer retain a certificate of the proof
test and make it available for examination.
Paragraph (g) of the Standard covers metal mesh slings. Paragraph
(g)(1) requires each metal mesh sling to have a durable marking
permanently affixed that states the rated capacity for vertical basket
hitch and choker hitch loadings. Paragraph (g)(8)(ii) requires that
once repaired, each metal mesh sling be permanently marked or tagged,
or a written record maintained to indicate the date and type of the
repairs made, and the person or organization that performed the
repairs. Records of the repairs shall be made available for
examination.
Paragraph (i) of the Standard covers synthetic web slings.
Paragraph (i)(1) requires that synthetic web slings be marked or coded
to show the rated capacities for each type of hitch, and
[[Page 30489]]
type of synthetic web material used in the sling.
Paragraph (i)(8)(i) prohibits the use of repaired synthetic web
slings until they have been proof tested by the manufacturer or
equivalent entity. Paragraph (i)(8)(ii) requires the employer to retain
a certificate of the proof test and make it available for examination.
The information on the identification tags, markings, and codings
assist the employer in determining whether the sling can be used for
the lifting task. The sling inspections enable early detection of
faulty slings. The inspection and repair records provide employers with
information about when the last inspection was made and about the type
of the repairs made. This information provides some assurance about the
condition of the slings. These records also provide the most efficient
means for an OSHA compliance officer to determine that an employer is
complying with the Standard. Proof-testing certificates give employers,
employees, and OSHA compliance officers assurance that slings are safe
to use. The certificates also provide the compliance officers with an
efficient means to assess employer compliance with the Standard.
II. Special Issues for Comment
OSHA has a particular interest in comments on the following issues:
Whether the proposed information collection requirements
are necessary for the proper performance of the Agency's functions,
including whether the information is useful;
The accuracy of OSHA's estimate of the burden (time and
costs) of the information collection requirements, including the
validity of the methodology and assumptions used;
The quality, utility, and clarity of the information
collected; and
Ways to minimize the burden on employees who must comply;
for example, by using automated or other technological information
collection and transmission techniques.
III. Proposed Actions
OSHA proposes to extend the Office of Management and Budget's (OMB)
approval of the collection of information (paperwork) requirements
necessitated by the Standard on Slings (29 CFR 1910.184). In its
extension request, OSHA also is proposing to reduce the total burden
hours for these requirements from 21,517 hours to 19,167 hours. The
Agency will include this summary in its request to OMB to extend the
approval of the collection of information requirements.
Type of Review: Extension of currently approved information
collection requirements.
Title: Slings (29 CFR 1910.184).
OMB Number: 1218-0223.
Affected Public: Business or other for-profits; Not-for-profit
organizations; Federal Government; State, local, or tribal government.
Number of respondents: 65,000.
Frequency of Response: On occasion annually;
Average Time per Response: Varies from 1 minute (.02 hour) to
maintain a certificate to 30 minutes (.50 hour) for a manufacturing
worker to acquire information from a manufacturer for a new tag, make a
new tag, and affix it to a sling.
Estimated Total Burden Hours: 19,167.
Estimated Cost (Operation and Maintenance): $0.
IV. Public Participation--Submission of Comments on This Notice and
Internet Access to Comments and Submissions
You may submit comments and supporting materials in response to
this notice by (1) hard copy, (2) fax transmission (facsimile), or (3)
electronically through the OSHA Web page. Because of security-related
problems, a significant delay may occur in the receipt of comments by
regular mail. Please contact the OSHA Docket Office at (202) 693-2350
(TTY (877) 889-5627) for information about security procedures
concerning the delivery of submissions by express delivery, hand
delivery, and courier service.
All comments, submissions and background documents are available
for inspection and copying at the OSHA Docket Office at the above
address. Comments and submissions posted on OSHA's Web page are
available at https://www.OSHA.gov. Contact the OSHA Docket Office for
information about materials not available through the OSHA Web page and
for assistance using the Web page to locate docket submissions.
Electronic copies of this Federal Register notice as well as other
relevant documents are available on OSHA's Web page. Since all
submissions become public, private information such as social security
numbers should not be submitted.
V. Authority and Signature
Jonathan L. Snare, Acting Assistance Secretary of Labor for
Occupational Safety and Health, directed the preparation of this
notice. The authority for this notice is the Paperwork Reduction Act of
1995 (44 U.S.C. 3506 et seq.), and Secretary of Labor's Order No. 5-
2002 (67 FR 65008).
Signed at Washington, DC, on May 20, 2005.
Jonathan L. Snare,
Acting Assistant Secretary of Labor.
[FR Doc. 05-10564 Filed 5-25-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-26-M