Renee's Manufacturing, Inc., San Francisco, CA; Notice of Negative Determination Regarding Application for Reconsideration, 25865 [E5-2401]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 93 / Monday, May 16, 2005 / Notices
25865
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
Renee’s Manufacturing, San Francisco,
California, thereby creating a new
period of investigation that would
include changing conditions.
[TA–W–56,484]
Conclusion
[TA–W–56,959]
Renee’s Manufacturing, Inc., San
Francisco, CA; Notice of Negative
Determination Regarding Application
for Reconsideration
After review of the application and
investigative findings, I conclude that
there has been no error or
misinterpretation of the law or of the
facts which would justify
reconsideration of the Department of
Labor’s prior decision. Accordingly, the
application is denied.
Tyler Pipe Company, South Plant;
Tyler, TX; Notice of Termination of
Investigation
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
By application of April 7, 2005 a
petitioner requested administrative
reconsideration of the Department’s
negative determination regarding
eligibility for workers and former
workers of the subject firm to apply for
Trade Adjustment Assistance (TAA) and
Alternative Trade Adjustment
Assistance (ATAA). The denial notice
was signed on March 4, 2005 and
published in the Federal Register on
April 1, 2005 (70 FR 16846). Pursuant
to 29 CFR 90.18(c) reconsideration may
be granted under the following
circumstances:
(1) If it appears on the basis of facts
not previously considered that the
determination complained of was
erroneous;
(2) If it appears that the determination
complained of was based on a mistake
in the determination of facts not
previously considered; or
(3) If in the opinion of the Certifying
Officer, a misinterpretation of facts or of
the law justified reconsideration of the
decision.
The TAA petition, filed on behalf of
workers at Renee’s Manufacturing, San
Francisco, California sewing women’s
tops, bottoms, blouses and skirts on a
contract basis was denied because the
‘‘contributed importantly’’ group
eligibility requirement of Section 222 of
the Trade Act of 1974 was not met. The
‘‘contributed importantly’’ test is
generally demonstrated through a
survey of the workers’ firm’s customers.
The survey revealed no imports of
women’s tops, bottoms, blouses and
skirts during the relevant period. The
subject firm did not import women’s
tops, bottoms, blouses and skirts in the
relevant period nor did it shift
production to a foreign country.
In the request for reconsideration, the
petitioner alleges that the layoffs at the
subject firm are attributable to a shift in
production to a foreign country. A
company official was contacted
regarding the above allegations. The
company official stated that no
production has been shifted from the
subject firm to a foreign country and
currently, there are no such plans.
Should the shift abroad occur, the
petitioners are encouraged to file a new
petition on behalf of workers at the
VerDate jul<14>2003
16:37 May 13, 2005
Jkt 205001
Signed at Washington, DC, this 2nd day of
May, 2005.
Linda G. Poole,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade
Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E5–2401 Filed 5–13–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–30–P
Employment and Training
Administration
[TA–W–56,880]
BILLING CODE 4510–30–P
Sanford North America, Sanford Paper
Mate Division Including Leased
Workers of Ultimate Staffing, A
Division of Newell Rubbermaid; Santa
Monica, CA; Notice of Termination of
Investigation
Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade
Act of 1974, as amended, an
investigation was initiated on April 5,
2005 in response to a petition filed by
a company official on behalf of workers
at Sanford North America, Sanford
Paper Mate Division, including leased
workers of Ultimate Staffing, a division
of Newell Rubbermaid, Santa Monica,
California.
The petitioner has requested that the
petition be withdrawn. Consequently,
the investigation has been terminated.
Signed at Washington, DC this 28th day of
April 2005.
Richard Church,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade
Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E5–2418 Filed 5–13–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–30–P
Frm 00064
Fmt 4703
Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade
Act of 1974, as amended, an
investigation was initiated on April 14,
2005 in response to a petition filed by
the United Steelworkers of America, on
behalf of workers at Tyler Pipe
Company, South Plant, Tyler, Texas.
The petitioning group of workers is
covered by an active certification, (TA–
W–52,418) which does not expire until
September 9, 2005. Consequently,
further investigation in this case would
serve no purpose, and the investigation
has been terminated.
Signed at Washington, DC, this 2nd day of
May 2005.
Linda G. Poole,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade
Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E5–2422 Filed 5–13–05; 8:45 am]
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
PO 00000
Employment and Training
Administration
Sfmt 4703
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
Draft Regulatory Guide: Issuance,
Availability
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission (NRC) has issued for public
comment a draft of a new guide in the
agency’s Regulatory Guide Series. This
series has been developed to describe
and make available to the public such
information as methods that are
acceptable to the NRC staff for
implementing specific parts of the
NRC’s regulations, techniques that the
staff uses in evaluating specific
problems or postulated accidents, and
data that the staff needs in its review of
applications for permits and licenses.
The draft Revision 2 of Regulatory
Guide 8.7, entitled ‘‘Instructions for
Recording and Reporting Occupational
Radiation Dose Data,’’ is temporarily
identified by its task number, DG–8029,
which should be mentioned in all
related correspondence. Like its
predecessors, the proposed revision
describes an acceptable program for the
preparation, retention, and reporting of
records of occupational radiation doses
in accordance with Title 10, Part 20, of
the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR
Part 20), ‘‘Standards for Protection
Against Radiation.’’ Section 20.1502
establishes ‘‘Conditions Requiring
E:\FR\FM\16MYN1.SGM
16MYN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 93 (Monday, May 16, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 25865]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E5-2401]
[[Page 25865]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training Administration
[TA-W-56,484]
Renee's Manufacturing, Inc., San Francisco, CA; Notice of
Negative Determination Regarding Application for Reconsideration
By application of April 7, 2005 a petitioner requested
administrative reconsideration of the Department's negative
determination regarding eligibility for workers and former workers of
the subject firm to apply for Trade Adjustment Assistance (TAA) and
Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance (ATAA). The denial notice was
signed on March 4, 2005 and published in the Federal Register on April
1, 2005 (70 FR 16846). Pursuant to 29 CFR 90.18(c) reconsideration may
be granted under the following circumstances:
(1) If it appears on the basis of facts not previously considered
that the determination complained of was erroneous;
(2) If it appears that the determination complained of was based on
a mistake in the determination of facts not previously considered; or
(3) If in the opinion of the Certifying Officer, a
misinterpretation of facts or of the law justified reconsideration of
the decision.
The TAA petition, filed on behalf of workers at Renee's
Manufacturing, San Francisco, California sewing women's tops, bottoms,
blouses and skirts on a contract basis was denied because the
``contributed importantly'' group eligibility requirement of Section
222 of the Trade Act of 1974 was not met. The ``contributed
importantly'' test is generally demonstrated through a survey of the
workers' firm's customers. The survey revealed no imports of women's
tops, bottoms, blouses and skirts during the relevant period. The
subject firm did not import women's tops, bottoms, blouses and skirts
in the relevant period nor did it shift production to a foreign
country.
In the request for reconsideration, the petitioner alleges that the
layoffs at the subject firm are attributable to a shift in production
to a foreign country. A company official was contacted regarding the
above allegations. The company official stated that no production has
been shifted from the subject firm to a foreign country and currently,
there are no such plans.
Should the shift abroad occur, the petitioners are encouraged to
file a new petition on behalf of workers at the Renee's Manufacturing,
San Francisco, California, thereby creating a new period of
investigation that would include changing conditions.
Conclusion
After review of the application and investigative findings, I
conclude that there has been no error or misinterpretation of the law
or of the facts which would justify reconsideration of the Department
of Labor's prior decision. Accordingly, the application is denied.
Signed at Washington, DC, this 2nd day of May, 2005.
Linda G. Poole,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E5-2401 Filed 5-13-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-P
