Application Fee Increase for Administrative Waivers of the Coastwise Trade Laws, 25010-25012 [05-9433]
Download as PDF
25010
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 91 / Thursday, May 12, 2005 / Proposed Rules
gasoline and coal. Nitrogen oxides react
with volatile organic compounds to
form ozone or smog and are also major
components of acid rain.
What Areas in Texas Will This Action
Affect?
The TERP will provide potential
emission reductions in the following
counties: Bastrop, Bexar, Brazoria,
Caldwell, Chambers, Collin, Comal,
Dallas, Denton, El Paso, Ellis, Fort Bend,
Galveston, Gregg, Guadalupe, Harris,
Hardin, Harrison, Hayes, Henderson,
Hood, Hunt, Jefferson, Johnson,
Kaufman, Liberty, Montgomery, Nueces,
Orange, Parker, Rockwall, Rusk, San
Patricio, Smith, Tarrant, Travis, Upshur,
Victoria, Waller, Williamson, Wilson,
and any other county located within an
area of Texas designated as
nonattaiment for ground-level ozone.
Why Are We Proposing To Approve
This Submittal?
TERP Division 3 is a measure relied
upon in State Implementation Plans for
the Early Action Compact areas of
Austin, San Antonio, and Northeast
Texas, as well as the Houston/Galveston
Attainment Demonstration, and the
Dallas/Fort Worth 5 percent Increment
of Progress Plan. The amount of
emission reductions projected for the
TERP program is delineated in each of
these plan revisions. These reductions
are assisting areas to come into
attainment with the National Ambient
Air Quality Standard for ozone.
Diesel engines are targeted due to
their relatively high NOX emissions and
their long operational life, which makes
the introduction of newer cleaner
engines into a fleet a long term process
with normal turnover. The TERP will
offset the incremental cost of projects
that will reduce oxides of nitrogen
emissions from heavy duty diesel trucks
and construction equipment in
nonattainment areas. This is an
incentive to owners and operators to
upgrade their fleets at an expedited rate.
The upgrade of these fleets will reduce
the amount of NOX emissions to the
atmosphere. We are proposing to
approve these revisions to the Texas SIP
because they will contribute to the
attainment of the ozone standard, and
therefore strengthen the SIP.
Proposed Action
TERP Division 3 is consistent with
EPA guidance for an economic incentive
program. See ‘‘Improving Air Quality
With Economic Incentive Programs,’’
EPA Office of Air and Radiation, EPA–
452–/R–01–001 (Jan. 2001). Therefore,
we propose to approve the TERP
Division 3 rules.
VerDate jul<14>2003
13:25 May 11, 2005
Jkt 205001
Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
The Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) has exempted this regulatory
action from Executive Order 12866,
entitled ‘‘Regulatory Planning and
Review.’’ This rule is not a ‘‘significant
energy action’’ as defined in Executive
Order 13211, ‘‘Actions Concerning
Regulations That Significantly Affect
Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use’’ (66
FR 28355 (May 22, 2001)), because it is
not likely to have a significant adverse
effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy. This proposed action merely
proposes to approve state law as
meeting Federal requirements and
imposes no additional requirements
beyond those imposed by state law.
Accordingly, the Administrator certifies
that this proposed rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.). Because this rule
proposes to approve pre-existing
requirements under state law and does
not impose any additional enforceable
duty beyond that required by state law,
it does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4).
This proposed rule also does not have
tribal implications because it will not
have a substantial direct effect on one or
more Indian tribes, on the relationship
between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
as specified by Executive Order 13175
(65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000). This
action also does not have federalism
implications because it does not have
substantial direct effects on the States,
on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government, as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255,
August 10, 1999). This action merely
proposes to approve a state rule
implementing a Federal standard, and
does not alter the relationship or the
distribution of power and
responsibilities established in the Clean
Air Act. This proposed rule also is not
subject to Executive Order 13045
‘‘Protection of Children from
Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks’’ (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997).
EPA interprets Executive Order 13045
as applying only to those regulatory
actions that are based on health or safety
risks, such that the analysis required
under section 5–501 of the Order has
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
the potential to influence the regulation.
This proposed rule is not subject to
Executive Order 13045 because it
approves a state program.
In reviewing SIP submissions, EPA’s
role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of
the Clean Air Act. In this context, in the
absence of a prior existing requirement
for the State to use voluntary consensus
standards (VCS), EPA has no authority
to disapprove a SIP submission for
failure to use VCS. It would thus be
inconsistent with applicable law for
EPA, when it reviews a SIP submission,
to use VCS in place of a SIP submission
that otherwise satisfies the provisions of
the Clean Air Act. Thus, the
requirements of section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C.
272 note) do not apply. This proposed
rule does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Incorporation by reference,
Intergovernmental relations, Lead,
Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Particulate
matter, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile
organic compounds.
Dated: May 4, 2005.
Richard E. Greene,
Regional Administrator, Region 6.
[FR Doc. 05–9480 Filed 5–11–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Maritime Administration
46 CFR Part 388
[Docket Number: MARAD–2005–21105]
RIN 2133–AB50
Application Fee Increase for
Administrative Waivers of the
Coastwise Trade Laws
Maritime Administration,
Department of Transportation.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The Maritime Administration
(MARAD) proposes to increase the
application fee for administrative
waivers of the coastwise trade laws from
$300 to $500. The increased fee would
align the application fee with the actual
cost of processing and issuing each
waiver.
DATES: Comments are due June 13, 2005.
E:\FR\FM\12MYP1.SGM
12MYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 91 / Thursday, May 12, 2005 / Proposed Rules
You may submit comments
[identified by DOT DMS Docket Number
MARAD–2005–21105] by any of the
following methods:
• Web Site: https://dms.dot.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting
comments on the DOT electronic docket
site.
• Mail: Docket Management Facility;
U.S. Department of Transportation, 400
7th St., SW., Nassif Building, Room PL–
401, Washington, DC 20590–001.
• Hand Delivery: Room PL–401 on
the plaza level of the Nassif Building,
400 7th St., SW., Washington, DC,
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
online instructions for submitting
comments.
Instructions: All submissions must
include the agency name and docket
number for this rulemaking. Note that
all comments received will be posted
without change to https://dms.dot.gov
including any personal information
provided. Please see the Privacy Act
heading under Regulatory Notices.
Docket: For access to the docket to
read background documents or
comments received, go to https://
dms.dot.gov at any time or to Room PL–
401 on the plaza level of the Nassif
Building, 400 7th St., SW., Washington,
DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Sharon Cassidy, Office of Ports and
Domestic Shipping, Maritime
Administration, MAR–830, 400 7th St.,
SW., Rm. 7201 Washington, DC 20590;
telephone: (202) 366–5506.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Title V of
the Independent Offices Appropriations
Act of 1952 (‘‘IOAA’’; 31 U.S.C. 9701)
authorizes Federal agencies to establish
and collect user fees. The statute
provides that each service or thing of
value provided by an agency should be
self-sustaining to the extent possible,
and that each charge shall be fair and
based on the costs to the Government,
the value of the service or thing to the
recipient, the policy or interest served,
and other relevant factors. 31 U.S.C.
9701.
The primary guidance for
implementation of the IOAA is Office of
Management and Budget (OMB)
Circular No. A–25 (‘‘User Charges,’’ July
8, 1993). Circular A–25 directs agencies
to assess user charges against
identifiable recipients for special
benefits derived from Federal activities
beyond those received by the general
public. Circular A–25, section 6.
Circular A–25 further directs agencies,
ADDRESSES:
VerDate jul<14>2003
13:25 May 11, 2005
Jkt 205001
with limited exceptions, to recover the
full cost of providing a Government
service from the direct recipients of
special benefits. Section 6(d) of Circular
A–25 defines ‘‘full cost’’ as including
‘‘all direct and indirect costs to any part
of the Federal Government of providing
a good, resource, or service.’’
Pursuant to these directives, MARAD
is proposing to increase the application
fee for administrative waivers of the
coastwise trade laws under 46 CFR part
388 for eligible small vessels. Under 46
CFR part 388, owners of small passenger
vessels may apply for waivers of the
U.S.-build requirements of the
Passenger Vessel Services Act and
section 27 of the Merchant Marine Act,
1920, to allow the carriage of no more
than 12 passengers for hire in the
coastwise trade. Because waivers under
part 388 represent special benefits to
identifiable recipients (i.e., vessel
owners) that are beyond the benefits and
services normally received by the
general public, the IOAA and Circular
A–25 direct MARAD to assess user fees
for providing this service. The current
application fee for a waiver is $300.
MARAD proposes to increase this fee to
$500 as set forth below.
Following the principles embodied in
Circular A–25, MARAD examined the
costs associated with processing and
issuing waivers under part 388 to
determine if the current $300 fee
recovers the full costs of administering
the program. The main cost components
of the program include direct and
indirect personnel costs and Federal
Register publication costs. Our review
of the program determined that average
personnel costs for processing each
uncontested application are $204.50 and
$1,118.50 for each contested application
(on average, 7% of all waiver
applications are contested, based on the
236 applications sampled for our
analysis). Thus, the total average
personnel costs are $268.48 for
processing each application. The second
main cost component of the program is
the cost of publishing notices of waiver
applications in the Federal Register.
The current Federal Register
publication cost is $155 per column and
the average length of a public notice
published for this program is 1.5
columns. Thus, the total average
publication cost is $232.50. The sum
total of personnel costs and Federal
Register publication costs is $500.98.
Therefore, MARAD is proposing to raise
the application fee from $300 to $500 in
order to recover these costs.
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
25011
Regulatory Analyses and Notices
Executive Order 12866 and DOT
Regulatory Policies and Procedures
This proposed rule is not considered
a significant regulatory action under
section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866
and, therefore, was not reviewed by the
Office of Management and Budget. This
proposed rule is not likely to result in
an annual effect on the economy of $100
million or more. This proposed rule is
also not significant under the Regulatory
Policies and Procedures of the
Department of Transportation (44 FR
11034, February 26, 1979). The costs
and economic impact associated with
this rulemaking are considered to be so
minimal that no further analysis is
necessary.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
In accordance with the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.), the
Maritime Administrator certifies that
this proposed rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
While this proposed rule, if
promulgated, will affect businesses that
qualify as small entities under Small
Business Administration guidelines,
MARAD does not believe that the
modest increase in this one-time, nonrecurring fee (unless an applicant must
reapply due to a revocation) will result
in a significant economic impact on
small entities. Further, MARAD is
required under Federal directives to
assess recipients of special
governmental services reasonable
charges to recover the costs of providing
such services.
Federalism
We have analyzed this proposed rule
in accordance with the principles and
criteria contained in Executive Order
13132 (Federalism) and have
determined that it does not have
sufficient federalism implications to
warrant the preparation of a federalism
summary impact statement. These
regulations have no substantial effects
on the States, the current Federal-State
relationship, or the current distribution
of power and responsibilities among
local officials. Therefore, consultation
with State and local officials is not
necessary.
Executive Order 13175
MARAD does not believe that this
proposed rule will significantly or
uniquely affect the communities of
Indian tribal governments when
analyzed under the principles and
criteria contained in Executive Order
13175 (Consultation and Coordination
E:\FR\FM\12MYP1.SGM
12MYP1
25012
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 91 / Thursday, May 12, 2005 / Proposed Rules
with Indian Tribal Governments).
Therefore, the funding and consultation
requirements of this Executive Order do
not apply.
Environmental Impact Statement
We have analyzed this proposed rule
for purposes of compliance with the
National Environmental Policy Act of
1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.) and have
concluded that under the categorical
exclusions in section 4.05 of Maritime
Administrative Order (MAO) 600–1,
‘‘Procedures for Considering
Environmental Impacts,’’ 50 FR 11606
(March 22, 1985), neither the
preparation of an Environmental
Assessment, an Environmental Impact
Statement, nor a Finding of No
Significant Impact for this proposed rule
is required.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
This proposed rule does not impose
an unfunded mandate under the
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of
1995. It does not result in costs of $100
million or more, in the aggregate, to any
of the following: State, local, or Native
American tribal governments, or the
private sector. This proposed rule is the
least burdensome alternative that
achieves this objective of U.S. policy.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This proposed rule contains
information collection requirements
covered by the Office of Management
and Budget approval number 2133–
0529. The changes have no impact on
the reporting burden.
1. The authority citation for part 388
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 46 App. U.S.C. 1114(b); Public
Law 105–383, 112 Stat. 3445 (46 U.S.C.
12106 note); 49 CFR 1.66.
2. Amend § 388.3 by revising
paragraph (a)(1) and the introductory
text of paragraph (a)(2) to read as
follows:
§ 388.3
Application and fee.
(a) * * *
(1) The application form contained on
MARAD’s Web site at https://
www.marad.dot.gov may be submitted
electronically with credit card or
Automated Clearinghouse (ACH)
payment of the $500 application fee.
(2) Alternatively, applicants may send
written applications to Small Vessel
Waiver Applications, Office of Ports and
Domestic Shipping, MAR–830, Room
7201, 400 7th St., SW., Washington, DC
20590. Written applications need not be
in any particular format, but must be
signed, be accompanied by a check for
$500 made out to the order of ‘‘Maritime
Administration’’, and contain the
following information:
*
*
*
*
*
Dated: May 6, 2005.
By Order of the Maritime Administrator.
Joel C. Richard,
Secretary, Maritime Administration.
[FR Doc. 05–9433 Filed 5–11–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–81–P
Anyone is able to search the
electronic form of all comments
received into any of our dockets by the
name of the individual submitting the
comment (or signing the comment, if
submitted on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may
review DOT’s complete Privacy Act
Statement in the Federal Register
published on April 11, 2000 (Volume
65, Number 70; Pages 19477–78) or you
may visit https://dms.dot.gov.
List of Subjects in 46 CFR Part 388
Administrative practice and
procedure, Maritime carriers, Passenger
vessels, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
Accordingly, the Maritime
Administration amends 46 CFR chapter
II, subchapter J, by revising part 388 as
follows:
13:25 May 11, 2005
Jkt 205001
Fishery Conservation and Management
Act and the Administrative Procedure
Act. CCA has petitioned the U.S.
Department of Commerce to promulgate
emergency regulations or interim
measures to address overfishing of red
snapper in the Gulf of Mexico primarily
by further reducing bycatch of juvenile
red snapper in the Gulf shrimp fishery.
NMFS is soliciting public comment on
this petition to help determine whether
NMFS should proceed with the
development of regulations suggested by
the petitioner.
DATES: Comments will be accepted
through 5 p.m. eastern time July 11,
2005.
You may submit comments
on this petition for rulemaking,
including its objectives, the need for
such regulation, alternative approaches,
and any other comments by any of the
following methods:
• E-mail: RSPetition@noaa.gov.
Include in the subject line the following
document identifier: RSPetition.
• Federal e-Rulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Mail: Phil Steele, Southeast Regional
Office, NMFS, 263 13th Avenue South,
St. Petersburg, FL 33701.
• Fax: 727–824–5308; Attention: Phil
Steele.
Copies of the petition are available
from NMFS at the address above.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Phil
Steele, telephone 727–551–5784, fax
727–824–5308, e-mail
Phil.steele@noaa.gov.
ADDRESSES:
The
petition filed by CCA states the red
snapper stock in the Gulf of Mexico is
overfished and undergoing overfishing.
Although the petition acknowledges the
directed red snapper commercial and
recreational sectors share responsibility
for rebuilding the stock, the petition
asserts failure of bycatch reduction
devices (BRDs), required in the Gulf
shrimp fishery to meet established
bycatch reduction standards, makes
recovery of the Gulf red snapper fishery
unlikely and ensures years of continued
overfishing of red snapper. The petition
seeks emergency regulations or interim
measures primarily to stop the
overfishing resulting from excessive
bycatch of juvenile red snapper in the
Gulf shrimp fishery.
The CCA petition states that the
prevention of overfishing and recovery
of the red snapper stock is predicated on
at least a 44–percent reduction in
bycatch of juvenile red snapper by the
Gulf shrimp fishery. Further, because
recent research indicates current BRD
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Privacy Act
VerDate jul<14>2003
PART 388—ADMINISTRATIVE
WAIVERS OF THE COASTWISE TRADE
LAWS
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
50 CFR Part 622
[I.D. 050405E]
Fisheries of the Caribbean, Gulf of
Mexico, and South Atlantic; Reef Fish
Fishery of the Gulf of Mexico; Red
Snapper
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Receipt of petition for
emergency regulations or interim
measures; request for comments.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: NOAA announces receipt of a
petition for emergency regulations or
interim measures, filed by The Coastal
Conservation Association (CCA) under
authority of the Magnuson-Stevens
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\12MYP1.SGM
12MYP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 91 (Thursday, May 12, 2005)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 25010-25012]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-9433]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Maritime Administration
46 CFR Part 388
[Docket Number: MARAD-2005-21105]
RIN 2133-AB50
Application Fee Increase for Administrative Waivers of the
Coastwise Trade Laws
AGENCY: Maritime Administration, Department of Transportation.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Maritime Administration (MARAD) proposes to increase the
application fee for administrative waivers of the coastwise trade laws
from $300 to $500. The increased fee would align the application fee
with the actual cost of processing and issuing each waiver.
DATES: Comments are due June 13, 2005.
[[Page 25011]]
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments [identified by DOT DMS Docket Number
MARAD-2005-21105] by any of the following methods:
Web Site: https://dms.dot.gov. Follow the instructions for
submitting comments on the DOT electronic docket site.
Mail: Docket Management Facility; U.S. Department of
Transportation, 400 7th St., SW., Nassif Building, Room PL-401,
Washington, DC 20590-001.
Hand Delivery: Room PL-401 on the plaza level of the
Nassif Building, 400 7th St., SW., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the online instructions for submitting
comments.
Instructions: All submissions must include the agency name and
docket number for this rulemaking. Note that all comments received will
be posted without change to https://dms.dot.gov including any personal
information provided. Please see the Privacy Act heading under
Regulatory Notices.
Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or
comments received, go to https://dms.dot.gov at any time or to Room PL-
401 on the plaza level of the Nassif Building, 400 7th St., SW.,
Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sharon Cassidy, Office of Ports and
Domestic Shipping, Maritime Administration, MAR-830, 400 7th St., SW.,
Rm. 7201 Washington, DC 20590; telephone: (202) 366-5506.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Title V of the Independent Offices
Appropriations Act of 1952 (``IOAA''; 31 U.S.C. 9701) authorizes
Federal agencies to establish and collect user fees. The statute
provides that each service or thing of value provided by an agency
should be self-sustaining to the extent possible, and that each charge
shall be fair and based on the costs to the Government, the value of
the service or thing to the recipient, the policy or interest served,
and other relevant factors. 31 U.S.C. 9701.
The primary guidance for implementation of the IOAA is Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) Circular No. A-25 (``User Charges,'' July
8, 1993). Circular A-25 directs agencies to assess user charges against
identifiable recipients for special benefits derived from Federal
activities beyond those received by the general public. Circular A-25,
section 6. Circular A-25 further directs agencies, with limited
exceptions, to recover the full cost of providing a Government service
from the direct recipients of special benefits. Section 6(d) of
Circular A-25 defines ``full cost'' as including ``all direct and
indirect costs to any part of the Federal Government of providing a
good, resource, or service.''
Pursuant to these directives, MARAD is proposing to increase the
application fee for administrative waivers of the coastwise trade laws
under 46 CFR part 388 for eligible small vessels. Under 46 CFR part
388, owners of small passenger vessels may apply for waivers of the
U.S.-build requirements of the Passenger Vessel Services Act and
section 27 of the Merchant Marine Act, 1920, to allow the carriage of
no more than 12 passengers for hire in the coastwise trade. Because
waivers under part 388 represent special benefits to identifiable
recipients (i.e., vessel owners) that are beyond the benefits and
services normally received by the general public, the IOAA and Circular
A-25 direct MARAD to assess user fees for providing this service. The
current application fee for a waiver is $300. MARAD proposes to
increase this fee to $500 as set forth below.
Following the principles embodied in Circular A-25, MARAD examined
the costs associated with processing and issuing waivers under part 388
to determine if the current $300 fee recovers the full costs of
administering the program. The main cost components of the program
include direct and indirect personnel costs and Federal Register
publication costs. Our review of the program determined that average
personnel costs for processing each uncontested application are $204.50
and $1,118.50 for each contested application (on average, 7% of all
waiver applications are contested, based on the 236 applications
sampled for our analysis). Thus, the total average personnel costs are
$268.48 for processing each application. The second main cost component
of the program is the cost of publishing notices of waiver applications
in the Federal Register. The current Federal Register publication cost
is $155 per column and the average length of a public notice published
for this program is 1.5 columns. Thus, the total average publication
cost is $232.50. The sum total of personnel costs and Federal Register
publication costs is $500.98. Therefore, MARAD is proposing to raise
the application fee from $300 to $500 in order to recover these costs.
Regulatory Analyses and Notices
Executive Order 12866 and DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures
This proposed rule is not considered a significant regulatory
action under section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866 and, therefore, was
not reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget. This proposed rule
is not likely to result in an annual effect on the economy of $100
million or more. This proposed rule is also not significant under the
Regulatory Policies and Procedures of the Department of Transportation
(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979). The costs and economic impact
associated with this rulemaking are considered to be so minimal that no
further analysis is necessary.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
In accordance with the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et
seq.), the Maritime Administrator certifies that this proposed rule
will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of
small entities. While this proposed rule, if promulgated, will affect
businesses that qualify as small entities under Small Business
Administration guidelines, MARAD does not believe that the modest
increase in this one-time, non-recurring fee (unless an applicant must
reapply due to a revocation) will result in a significant economic
impact on small entities. Further, MARAD is required under Federal
directives to assess recipients of special governmental services
reasonable charges to recover the costs of providing such services.
Federalism
We have analyzed this proposed rule in accordance with the
principles and criteria contained in Executive Order 13132 (Federalism)
and have determined that it does not have sufficient federalism
implications to warrant the preparation of a federalism summary impact
statement. These regulations have no substantial effects on the States,
the current Federal-State relationship, or the current distribution of
power and responsibilities among local officials. Therefore,
consultation with State and local officials is not necessary.
Executive Order 13175
MARAD does not believe that this proposed rule will significantly
or uniquely affect the communities of Indian tribal governments when
analyzed under the principles and criteria contained in Executive Order
13175 (Consultation and Coordination
[[Page 25012]]
with Indian Tribal Governments). Therefore, the funding and
consultation requirements of this Executive Order do not apply.
Environmental Impact Statement
We have analyzed this proposed rule for purposes of compliance with
the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.)
and have concluded that under the categorical exclusions in section
4.05 of Maritime Administrative Order (MAO) 600-1, ``Procedures for
Considering Environmental Impacts,'' 50 FR 11606 (March 22, 1985),
neither the preparation of an Environmental Assessment, an
Environmental Impact Statement, nor a Finding of No Significant Impact
for this proposed rule is required.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
This proposed rule does not impose an unfunded mandate under the
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995. It does not result in costs of
$100 million or more, in the aggregate, to any of the following: State,
local, or Native American tribal governments, or the private sector.
This proposed rule is the least burdensome alternative that achieves
this objective of U.S. policy.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This proposed rule contains information collection requirements
covered by the Office of Management and Budget approval number 2133-
0529. The changes have no impact on the reporting burden.
Privacy Act
Anyone is able to search the electronic form of all comments
received into any of our dockets by the name of the individual
submitting the comment (or signing the comment, if submitted on behalf
of an association, business, labor union, etc.). You may review DOT's
complete Privacy Act Statement in the Federal Register published on
April 11, 2000 (Volume 65, Number 70; Pages 19477-78) or you may visit
https://dms.dot.gov.
List of Subjects in 46 CFR Part 388
Administrative practice and procedure, Maritime carriers, Passenger
vessels, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
Accordingly, the Maritime Administration amends 46 CFR chapter II,
subchapter J, by revising part 388 as follows:
PART 388--ADMINISTRATIVE WAIVERS OF THE COASTWISE TRADE LAWS
1. The authority citation for part 388 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 46 App. U.S.C. 1114(b); Public Law 105-383, 112 Stat.
3445 (46 U.S.C. 12106 note); 49 CFR 1.66.
2. Amend Sec. 388.3 by revising paragraph (a)(1) and the
introductory text of paragraph (a)(2) to read as follows:
Sec. 388.3 Application and fee.
(a) * * *
(1) The application form contained on MARAD's Web site at https://
www.marad.dot.gov may be submitted electronically with credit card or
Automated Clearinghouse (ACH) payment of the $500 application fee.
(2) Alternatively, applicants may send written applications to
Small Vessel Waiver Applications, Office of Ports and Domestic
Shipping, MAR-830, Room 7201, 400 7th St., SW., Washington, DC 20590.
Written applications need not be in any particular format, but must be
signed, be accompanied by a check for $500 made out to the order of
``Maritime Administration'', and contain the following information:
* * * * *
Dated: May 6, 2005.
By Order of the Maritime Administrator.
Joel C. Richard,
Secretary, Maritime Administration.
[FR Doc. 05-9433 Filed 5-11-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-81-P