Self-Regulatory Organizations; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change by the New York Stock Exchange, Inc. Relating to Its Original Financial Listing Standards Pilot Program, 23288-23290 [E5-2169]
Download as PDF
23288
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 85 / Wednesday, May 4, 2005 / Notices
Securities and Exchange Commission,
450 Fifth Street, NW., Washington, DC
20549–0609.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–NASD–2005–054. This file
number should be included on the
subject line if e-mail is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for inspection and copying in
the Commission’s Public Reference
Room. Copies of such filing also will be
available for inspection and copying at
the principal office of the Nasdaq. All
comments received will be posted
without change; the Commission does
not edit personal identifying
information from submissions. You
should submit only information that
you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File
Number SR–NASD–2005–054 and
should be submitted on or before May
25, 2005.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Market Regulation, pursuant to delegated
authority.5
Margaret H. McFarland,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. E5–2166 Filed 5–3–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–51628; File No. SR–NYSE–
2005–28]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Notice
of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness
of Proposed Rule Change by the New
York Stock Exchange, Inc. Relating to
Its Original Financial Listing Standards
Pilot Program
April 28, 2005.
Pursuant to section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Act’’)1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on April 25,
5 17
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
1 15
VerDate jul<14>2003
21:08 May 03, 2005
Jkt 205001
2005, the New York Stock Exchange,
Inc. (‘‘NYSE’’ or ‘‘Exchange’’) filed with
the Securities and Exchange
Commission (‘‘Commission’’) the
proposed rule change as described in
items I and II below, which items have
been prepared by the Exchange. The
proposed rule change has been filed by
the NYSE as a ‘‘non-controversial’’ rule
change pursuant to Rule 19b–4(f)(6)
under the Act.3 The Commission is
publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change
from interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange seeks to extend its
original financial listing standards pilot
program (the ‘‘Pilot Program’’) 4 until
the earlier of July 31, 2005, or such date
as the Commission may approve File
Number SR–NYSE–2004–20,5 which
seeks permanent approval of the Pilot
Program. The Pilot Program established
revised financial standards applicable to
the listing of equity securities on the
Exchange. The Pilot Program is
currently in effect on an extended basis
until the earlier of April 30, 2005, or
such date as the Commission may
approve File Number SR–NYSE–2004–
20.6
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for
the proposed rule change and discussed
any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of these
statements may be examined at the
places specified in item IV below. The
Exchange has prepared summaries, set
forth in sections A, B, and C below, of
the most significant parts of such
statements.
CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6).
Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 51104
(January 28, 2005), 70 FR 6482 (February 7, 2005)
(File No. SR–NYSE–2005–08); 50615 (October 29,
2004), 69 FR 64799 (November 8, 2004) (File No.
SR–2004–58); 50123 (July 29, 2004), 69 FR 57474
(August 5, 2004) (File No. SR–NYSE–2004–40); and
49154 (January 29, 2004), 69 FR 5633 (February 5,
2004) (approving File No. SR–NYSE–2003–43).
5 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 51332
(March 8, 2005), 70 FR 15392 (March 25, 2005).
6 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 51104,
supra note 4.
PO 00000
3 17
4 See
Frm 00201
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
1. Purpose
On January 29, 2004, the Commission
granted accelerated approval to the Pilot
Program on a six-month pilot basis
through July 30, 2004.7 Two comments
were received in response to File
Number SR–NYSE–2003–43.8 The
NYSE thereafter filed File Number SR–
NYSE–2004–15 on March 16, 2004 for
immediate effectiveness,9 which
suspended portions of the original Pilot
Program regarding minimum numerical
continued listing set forth in section
802.01B of the NYSE’s Listed Company
Manual. In File Number SR–NYSE–
2004–15, the Exchange noted its
intention to publish the requirements of
the original Pilot Program regarding
minimum numerical continued listing
standards set forth Section 802.01B for
public comment on a non-accelerated
timeframe. File Number SR–NYSE–
2004–15 did not, however, affect the
Pilot Program with respect to original
listing standards set forth in sections
102.01C and 103.01B of the NYSE’s
Listed Company Manual or the Pilot
Program’s non-substantive change to the
language of section 802.01C.
On April 4, 2004, the Exchange filed
File Number SR–NYSE–2004–20, which
seeks permanent approval for the Pilot
Program currently in effect with respect
to the Exchange’s original minimum
listing standards and approval of the
continued minimum listing standards as
originally proposed in File Number SR–
NYSE–2003–43. File Number SR–
NYSE–2004–20 was published in the
Federal Register on July 2, 2004.10
Three comment letters were received in
response to File Number SR–NYSE–
2004–20.11 Following consideration of
these comment letters, the Exchange
filed Amendment No. 2 to File Number
SR–NYSE–2004–20 on August 31,
7 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 49154,
supra note 4.
8 See letters to Jonathan G. Katz, Secretary,
Commission, from W. Randy Eaddy, Kilpatrick
Stockton LLP, dated March 11, 2004, and Kenneth
A. Hoogstra, von Briesen & Roper, s.c., dated
February 25, 2004.
9 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 49443
(March 18, 2004), 69 FR 13929 (March 24, 2004)
(File No. SR–NYSE–2004–15).
10 See supra note 5.
11 See letters to Jonathan G. Katz, Secretary,
Commission, from Richard F. Latour, President &
CEO, MicroFinancial Incorporated, July 15, 2004,
Kenneth A. Hoogstra, von Briesen & Roper, s.c.,
dated July 20, 2004, and John L. Patenaude, Vice
President Finance and Chief Financial Officer,
Nashua Corporation, dated July 22, 2004.
E:\FR\FM\04MYN1.SGM
04MYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 85 / Wednesday, May 4, 2005 / Notices
2004.12 On October 12, 2004, the
Exchange filed File Number SR–NYSE–
2004–58 to extend the Pilot Program
until January 31, 2005.13 On January 13,
2005, the Exchange filed File Number
SR–NYSE 2005–08 to extend the Pilot
Program until April 30, 2005.14Thereafter,
the Exchange filed amendments to File
Number SR–NYSE–2004–20 on
November 29, 2004,15 December 17,
2004,16 January 25, 2005,17 February 17,
2005,18 and March 4, 2005.19 File
Number SR–NYSE–2004–20, as
amended, was re-published for
comment in the Federal Register on
March 25, 2005.20 Therefore, the
Exchange believes it is appropriate to
extend the amended Pilot Program until
the earlier of July 31, 2005, or such date
as the Commission may approve File
Number SR–NYSE–2004–20.
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that the
proposed rule change is consistent with
Section 6(b)(5) of the Act 21 because it is
designed to prevent fraudulent and
manipulative acts and practices, to
promote just and equitable principles of
trade, to remove impediments to and
perfect the mechanism of a free and
open market and a national market
system, and, in general, to protect
investors and the public interest.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that
the proposed rule change will impose
any burden on competition that is not
necessary or appropriate in furtherance
of the purposes of the Act.
12 See letter to Nancy J. Sanow, Assistant Director,
Division, Commission, from Darla C. Stuckey,
Corporate Secretary, NYSE, dated August 31, 2004
(‘‘Amendment No. 2’’).
13 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 50615,
supra note 4.
14 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 51104,
supra note 4.
15 See Amendment No. 3, dated November 29,
2004, submitted by Mary Yeager, Assistant
Corporate Secretary, NYSE.
16 See Amendment No. 4, dated December 17,
2004, submitted by Mary Yeager, Assistant
Corporate Secretary, NYSE.
17 See Amendment No. 5, dated January 25, 2005,
submitted by Mary Yeager, Assistant Corporate
Secretary, NYSE.
18 See Amendment No. 6, dated February 17,
2005, submitted by Mary Yeager, Assistant
Corporate Secretary, NYSE.
19 See Amendment No. 7, dated March 4, 2005,
submitted by Mary Yeager, Assistant Corporate
Secretary, NYSE.
20 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 51332,
supra note 5.
21 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
VerDate jul<14>2003
21:08 May 03, 2005
Jkt 205001
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants, or Others
Written comments were neither
solicited nor received with respect to
the proposed rule change.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
Because the foregoing proposed rule
change (1) does not significantly affect
the protection of investors or the public
interest; (2) does not impose any
significant burden on competition; and
(3) by its terms, does not become
operative until 30 days from the date on
which it was filed, or such shorter time
as the Commission may designate if
consistent with the protection of
investors and the public interest, and
the Exchange provided the Commission
with written notice of its intent to file
the proposed rule change at least five
business days prior to the date of filing
of the proposed rule change, or such
shorter time as designated by the
Commission, it has become effective
pursuant to section 19(b)(3)(A) of the
Act 22 and Rule 19b–4(f)(6)
thereunder.23 At any time within 60
days of the filing of this proposed rule
change, the Commission may summarily
abrogate such rule change if it appears
to the Commission that such action is
necessary or appropriate in the public
interest, for the protection of investors,
or otherwise in furtherance of the
purposes of the Act.
Although Rule 19b–4(f)(6) under the
Act 24 requires that an Exchange submit
a notice of its intent to file at least five
business days prior to the filing date,
the Commission is waiving this
requirement at the Exchange’s request in
view of the fact that the proposed rule
change seeks to continue the existing
Pilot Program. The NYSE has also
requested that the Commission waive
the 30-day operative delay. The
Commission believes waiving the 30day operative delay is consistent with
the protection of investors and the
public interest. Waiver of the operative
date will allow the Exchange’s Pilot
Program to continue without any
interruption in service to issuers and
investors. For these reasons, the
Commission designates the proposal to
be effective and operative upon filing
with the Commission.25
22 15
23 17
U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6).
24 Id.
25 For purposes only of waiving the 30-day
operative delay of this proposal, the Commission
has considered the proposed rule’s impact on
PO 00000
Frm 00202
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
23289
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s Internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an e-mail to rulecomments@sec.gov. Please include File
Number SR–NYSE–2005–28 on the
subject line.
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Jonathan G. Katz, Secretary,
Securities and Exchange Commission,
450 Fifth Street, NW., Washington, DC
20549–0609.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–NYSE–2005–28. This file
number should be included on the
subject line if e-mail is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for inspection and copying in
the Commission’s Public Reference
Section, 450 Fifth Street, NW.,
Washington, DC 20549. Copies of such
filing also will be available on NYSE’s
Web site (https://www.nyse.com/
regulation/construles/
1098741855384.html) and for inspection
and copying at the principal office of
NYSE. All comments received will be
posted without change; the Commission
does not edit personal identifying
information from submissions. You
should submit only information that
you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File
Number SR–NYSE–2005–28 and should
be submitted on or before May 25, 2005.
efficiency, competition, and capital formation. 15
U.S.C. 78c(f).
E:\FR\FM\04MYN1.SGM
04MYN1
23290
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 85 / Wednesday, May 4, 2005 / Notices
For the Commission, by the Division of
Market Regulation, pursuant to delegated
authority.26
J. Lynn Taylor,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. E5–2169 Filed 5–3–05; 8:45 am]
at the Commission Public Reference
Room.
BILLING CODE 8010–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–51627; File No. SR–PCX–
2005–27]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Notice
of Filing of Proposed Rule Change and
Amendment No. 1 Thereto by the
Pacific Exchange, Inc. Relating to the
Calculation of the National Best Bid or
Offer When Another Exchange is
Disconnected From the Intermarket
Option Linkage
April 28, 2005.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on March 31,
2005, the Pacific Exchange, Inc. (‘‘PCX’’
or ‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission
(‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule
change as described in Items I, II and III
below, which Items have been prepared
by the Exchange. On April 19, 2005, the
Exchange filed Amendment No. 1 to the
proposed rule change.3 The Commission
is publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change,
as amended, from interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange is proposing to add
Exchange Rule 6.94(e) to add provisions
for declaring an away market unreliable
when an away market is disconnected
from the Intermarket Option Linkage
(‘‘Linkage’’) 4 and to relocate the current
rule on declaring an away market
unreliable to Exchange Rule 6.94(e). The
text of the proposed rule change, as
amended, is available on the Exchange’s
Web site (https://www.pacificex.com), at
the principal office of the Exchange, and
26 17
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
3 See Form 19b–4 dated April 19, 2005
(‘‘Amendment No. 1’’). Amendment No. 1 replaced
and superseded the original filing in its entirety.
4 ‘‘Linkage’’ means the systems and data
communications network that link electronically
the Participants to one another for the purpose of
sending and receiving Linkage Orders, related
confirmations, order statuses and Administrative
Messages. See Section 2(14) of the Plan for the
Purpose of Creating and Operating and Intermarket
Option Linkage.
11
VerDate jul<14>2003
21:08 May 03, 2005
Jkt 205001
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for
the proposed rule change and discussed
any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of these
statements may be examined at the
places specified in Item IV below. The
Exchange has prepared summaries, set
forth in Sections A, B, and C below, of
the most significant aspects of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
1. Purpose
The purpose of the proposed rule
change is to codify the Exchange’s
current policy on declaring an away
market unreliable when an away market
is disconnected from Linkage.
Currently, the Exchange relies on
Exchange Rule 6.87(h)(4) to determine
whether an away market is unreliable.
In order to clarify the Exchange’s
practices for declaring an away market
unreliable, the Exchange is proposing to
add Exchange Rule 6.94(e). Proposed
Exchange Rule 6.94(e) is substantially
similar to current Exchange Rule
6.87(h)(4), except that proposed
Exchange Rule 6.94(e) adds provisions
relating to declaring an away market
unreliable when such away market is
disconnected from Linkage. Proposed
Exchange Rule 6.94(e)(A)(iii) would
codify the Exchange’s policy to declare
an away market unreliable if such away
market is disconnected from Linkage.
The Exchange believes that declaring an
away market that has been disconnected
from Linkage unreliable is necessary to
eliminate quotes from the National Best
Bid or Offer (‘‘NBBO’’) calculation that
are not readily available to PCX OTP
Holders 5 and OTP Firms.6 When the
Exchange receives notice that an away
market has been disconnected from
Linkage, the senior person in charge of
the Exchange Control Room will direct
that the away market that has been
disconnected from Linkage be declared
unreliable and removed from the
Exchange’s NBBO calculation until the
sooner of the end of the trading day or
the time that the quotes are confirmed
by the Exchange to be reliable again.
PO 00000
5 See
6 See
Exchange Rule 1.1(q).
Exchange Rule 1.1(r).
Frm 00203
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
The Exchange believes that the
described procedure for removing an
away market from, or including an away
market in, the Exchange’s NBBO
calculation is appropriate and efficient
because the Exchange receives
electronic confirmation that an away
market has been disconnected from or
reconnected to Linkage.7 Receipt of this
real time information, in conjunction
with the proposed rule change, will
allow the Exchange to disseminate the
most accurate NBBO calculation to the
PCX OTP Holders and OTP Firms.
The Exchange is also proposing to
move the provisions for declaring an
away market unreliable in Exchange
Rule 6.87(h)(4) to proposed Exchange
Rule 6.94 (Order Protection), because
the Exchange believes Exchange Rule
6.94 is a more appropriate rule to
address declaring an away market
unreliable.
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that the
proposed rule change is consistent with
Section 6(b) of the Act 8 in general, and
furthers the objectives of Section 6(b)(5)
of the Act 9 in particular, because the
proposed rule change is designed to
prevent fraudulent and manipulative
acts and practices, to promote just and
equitable principles of trade, to foster
cooperation and coordination with
persons engaged in facilitating
transactions in securities, and to remove
impediments to and perfect the
mechanism of a free and open market
and a national market system.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that
the proposed rule change will impose
any burden on competition that is not
necessary or appropriate in furtherance
of the purposes of the Act.
C. Self Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants or Others
The Exchange has neither solicited
nor received written comments on the
proposed rule change.
7 At the request of the Exchange, the Commission
staff made a change to this sentence to clarify that
the Exchange believes that the described procedures
are appropriate and efficient for both removing an
away market, as well as for including an away
market, in the Exchange’s NBBO calculation.
Telephone conversation between Steven Matlin,
Senior Counsel, Exchange, and Kim Allen,
Attorney, Division of Market Regulation, on April
22, 2005.
8 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
9 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
E:\FR\FM\04MYN1.SGM
04MYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 85 (Wednesday, May 4, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 23288-23290]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E5-2169]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-51628; File No. SR-NYSE-2005-28]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Notice of Filing and Immediate
Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change by the New York Stock Exchange,
Inc. Relating to Its Original Financial Listing Standards Pilot Program
April 28, 2005.
Pursuant to section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act'')\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on April 25, 2005, the New York Stock Exchange, Inc. (``NYSE'' or
``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in items I and
II below, which items have been prepared by the Exchange. The proposed
rule change has been filed by the NYSE as a ``non-controversial'' rule
change pursuant to Rule 19b-4(f)(6) under the Act.\3\ The Commission is
publishing this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change
from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
\3\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange seeks to extend its original financial listing
standards pilot program (the ``Pilot Program'') \4\ until the earlier
of July 31, 2005, or such date as the Commission may approve File
Number SR-NYSE-2004-20,\5\ which seeks permanent approval of the Pilot
Program. The Pilot Program established revised financial standards
applicable to the listing of equity securities on the Exchange. The
Pilot Program is currently in effect on an extended basis until the
earlier of April 30, 2005, or such date as the Commission may approve
File Number SR-NYSE-2004-20.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ See Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 51104 (January 28,
2005), 70 FR 6482 (February 7, 2005) (File No. SR-NYSE-2005-08);
50615 (October 29, 2004), 69 FR 64799 (November 8, 2004) (File No.
SR-2004-58); 50123 (July 29, 2004), 69 FR 57474 (August 5, 2004)
(File No. SR-NYSE-2004-40); and 49154 (January 29, 2004), 69 FR 5633
(February 5, 2004) (approving File No. SR-NYSE-2003-43).
\5\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 51332 (March 8,
2005), 70 FR 15392 (March 25, 2005).
\6\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 51104, supra note 4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant parts of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
1. Purpose
On January 29, 2004, the Commission granted accelerated approval to
the Pilot Program on a six-month pilot basis through July 30, 2004.\7\
Two comments were received in response to File Number SR-NYSE-2003-
43.\8\ The NYSE thereafter filed File Number SR-NYSE-2004-15 on March
16, 2004 for immediate effectiveness,\9\ which suspended portions of
the original Pilot Program regarding minimum numerical continued
listing set forth in section 802.01B of the NYSE's Listed Company
Manual. In File Number SR-NYSE-2004-15, the Exchange noted its
intention to publish the requirements of the original Pilot Program
regarding minimum numerical continued listing standards set forth
Section 802.01B for public comment on a non-accelerated timeframe. File
Number SR-NYSE-2004-15 did not, however, affect the Pilot Program with
respect to original listing standards set forth in sections 102.01C and
103.01B of the NYSE's Listed Company Manual or the Pilot Program's non-
substantive change to the language of section 802.01C.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 49154, supra note 4.
\8\ See letters to Jonathan G. Katz, Secretary, Commission, from
W. Randy Eaddy, Kilpatrick Stockton LLP, dated March 11, 2004, and
Kenneth A. Hoogstra, von Briesen & Roper, s.c., dated February 25,
2004.
\9\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 49443 (March 18,
2004), 69 FR 13929 (March 24, 2004) (File No. SR-NYSE-2004-15).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
On April 4, 2004, the Exchange filed File Number SR-NYSE-2004-20,
which seeks permanent approval for the Pilot Program currently in
effect with respect to the Exchange's original minimum listing
standards and approval of the continued minimum listing standards as
originally proposed in File Number SR-NYSE-2003-43. File Number SR-
NYSE-2004-20 was published in the Federal Register on July 2, 2004.\10\
Three comment letters were received in response to File Number SR-NYSE-
2004-20.\11\ Following consideration of these comment letters, the
Exchange filed Amendment No. 2 to File Number SR-NYSE-2004-20 on August
31,
[[Page 23289]]
2004.\12\ On October 12, 2004, the Exchange filed File Number SR-NYSE-
2004-58 to extend the Pilot Program until January 31, 2005.\13\ On
January 13, 2005, the Exchange filed File Number SR-NYSE 2005-08 to
extend the Pilot Program until April 30, 2005.\14\Thereafter, the
Exchange filed amendments to File Number SR-NYSE-2004-20 on November
29, 2004,\15\ December 17, 2004,\16\ January 25, 2005,\17\ February 17,
2005,\18\ and March 4, 2005.\19\ File Number SR-NYSE-2004-20, as
amended, was re-published for comment in the Federal Register on March
25, 2005.\20\ Therefore, the Exchange believes it is appropriate to
extend the amended Pilot Program until the earlier of July 31, 2005, or
such date as the Commission may approve File Number SR-NYSE-2004-20.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ See supra note 5.
\11\ See letters to Jonathan G. Katz, Secretary, Commission,
from Richard F. Latour, President & CEO, MicroFinancial
Incorporated, July 15, 2004, Kenneth A. Hoogstra, von Briesen &
Roper, s.c., dated July 20, 2004, and John L. Patenaude, Vice
President Finance and Chief Financial Officer, Nashua Corporation,
dated July 22, 2004.
\12\ See letter to Nancy J. Sanow, Assistant Director, Division,
Commission, from Darla C. Stuckey, Corporate Secretary, NYSE, dated
August 31, 2004 (``Amendment No. 2'').
\13\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 50615, supra note
4.
\14\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 51104, supra note
4.
\15\ See Amendment No. 3, dated November 29, 2004, submitted by
Mary Yeager, Assistant Corporate Secretary, NYSE.
\16\ See Amendment No. 4, dated December 17, 2004, submitted by
Mary Yeager, Assistant Corporate Secretary, NYSE.
\17\ See Amendment No. 5, dated January 25, 2005, submitted by
Mary Yeager, Assistant Corporate Secretary, NYSE.
\18\ See Amendment No. 6, dated February 17, 2005, submitted by
Mary Yeager, Assistant Corporate Secretary, NYSE.
\19\ See Amendment No. 7, dated March 4, 2005, submitted by Mary
Yeager, Assistant Corporate Secretary, NYSE.
\20\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 51332, supra note
5.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent
with Section 6(b)(5) of the Act \21\ because it is designed to prevent
fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices, to promote just and
equitable principles of trade, to remove impediments to and perfect the
mechanism of a free and open market and a national market system, and,
in general, to protect investors and the public interest.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\21\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others
Written comments were neither solicited nor received with respect
to the proposed rule change.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
Because the foregoing proposed rule change (1) does not
significantly affect the protection of investors or the public
interest; (2) does not impose any significant burden on competition;
and (3) by its terms, does not become operative until 30 days from the
date on which it was filed, or such shorter time as the Commission may
designate if consistent with the protection of investors and the public
interest, and the Exchange provided the Commission with written notice
of its intent to file the proposed rule change at least five business
days prior to the date of filing of the proposed rule change, or such
shorter time as designated by the Commission, it has become effective
pursuant to section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \22\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(6)
thereunder.\23\ At any time within 60 days of the filing of this
proposed rule change, the Commission may summarily abrogate such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\22\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
\23\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Although Rule 19b-4(f)(6) under the Act \24\ requires that an
Exchange submit a notice of its intent to file at least five business
days prior to the filing date, the Commission is waiving this
requirement at the Exchange's request in view of the fact that the
proposed rule change seeks to continue the existing Pilot Program. The
NYSE has also requested that the Commission waive the 30-day operative
delay. The Commission believes waiving the 30-day operative delay is
consistent with the protection of investors and the public interest.
Waiver of the operative date will allow the Exchange's Pilot Program to
continue without any interruption in service to issuers and investors.
For these reasons, the Commission designates the proposal to be
effective and operative upon filing with the Commission.\25\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\24\ Id.
\25\ For purposes only of waiving the 30-day operative delay of
this proposal, the Commission has considered the proposed rule's
impact on efficiency, competition, and capital formation. 15 U.S.C.
78c(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
Use the Commission's Internet comment form (https://
www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
Send an e-mail to rule-comments@sec.gov. Please include
File Number SR-NYSE-2005-28 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
Send paper comments in triplicate to Jonathan G. Katz,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 450 Fifth Street, NW.,
Washington, DC 20549-0609.
All submissions should refer to File Number SR-NYSE-2005-28. This
file number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used.
To help the Commission process and review your comments more
efficiently, please use only one method. The Commission will post all
comments on the Commission's Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments,
all written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that
are filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating
to the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person,
other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance
with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for inspection
and copying in the Commission's Public Reference Section, 450 Fifth
Street, NW., Washington, DC 20549. Copies of such filing also will be
available on NYSE's Web site (https://www.nyse.com/regulation/
construles/1098741855384.html) and for inspection and copying at the
principal office of NYSE. All comments received will be posted without
change; the Commission does not edit personal identifying information
from submissions. You should submit only information that you wish to
make available publicly. All submissions should refer to File Number
SR-NYSE-2005-28 and should be submitted on or before May 25, 2005.
[[Page 23290]]
For the Commission, by the Division of Market Regulation,
pursuant to delegated authority.\26\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\26\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
J. Lynn Taylor,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. E5-2169 Filed 5-3-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-P