Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards (FMVSS); Small Business Impacts of Motor Vehicle Safety, 23081-23083 [05-8827]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 85 / Wednesday, May 4, 2005 / Proposed Rules
(‘‘900 MHz B/ILT Pool’’), in order to
facilitate flexible use. In particular, the
Commission proposes to permit any use
of the B/ILT channels in the 900 MHz
band that is consistent with the band’s
fixed and mobile allocations. In
addition, the Commission proposes to
license the remaining spectrum using a
geographic area licensing scheme, and
to adopt service rules, including
licensing, technical and operational
rules for the new geographic licensees.
3. On April 4, 2005, the United
Telecom Council, the National
Association of Manufacturers and
MRFAC, the Association of American
Railroads, the American Petroleum
Institute, the National Rural Electric
Cooperative Association, and the
Enterprise Wireless Alliance jointly
filed a request for an extension of time
to submit comments. They contend that
the current comment period does not
provide commenters with a sufficient
length of time to provide thorough and
meaningful responses. They also state
that they are conducting discussions
with other interested parties in an effort
to reach consensus that would allow a
consistent filing position in this matter
for most of the 900 MHz user
communities, and believe that this effort
will not be complete before the
comment filing deadline. On April 12,
2005, Nextel Communications, Inc. filed
an opposition to the comment period
extension request, arguing that any
delay would adversely impact the
Commission’s 800 MHz rebanding
effort, 69 FR 67823, November 22, 2004,
and would delay Nextel’s opportunity to
obtain, through the auction process, any
unused 900 MHz B/ILT spectrum.
Ordering Clauses
4. Pursuant to sections 4(i) and 4(j) of
the Communications Act of 1934, as
amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i) and 154(j),
and §§ 0.131, 0.331, and 1.46 of the
Commission’s rules, 47 CFR 0.131,
0.331, and 1.46, the deadline for filing
comments in response to the NPRM,
published at 70 FR 13143, March 18,
2005, in this proceeding, is extended to
May 18, 2005, and the deadline for
filing reply comments is extended to
June 2, 2005.
Federal Communications Commission.
Katherine M. Harris,
Deputy Chief, Mobility Division.
[FR Doc. 05–8682 Filed 5–3–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712–01–P
VerDate jul<14>2003
13:04 May 03, 2005
Jkt 205001
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration
49 CFR Part 571
[Docket No. NHTSA–05–21051]
Federal Motor Vehicle Safety
Standards (FMVSS); Small Business
Impacts of Motor Vehicle Safety
National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration (NHTSA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of regulatory review;
request for comments.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration (NHTSA) seeks
comments on the economic impact of its
regulations on small entities. As
required by Section 610 of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act, we are
attempting to identify rules that may
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities.
We also request comments on ways to
make these regulations easier to read
and understand. The focus of this notice
is rules that specifically relate to
passenger cars, multipurpose passenger
vehicles, trucks, buses, trailers,
incomplete vehicles, motorcycles, and
motor vehicle equipment.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before July 5, 2005.
ADDRESSES: You should mention the
docket number of this document in your
comments and submit your comments
in writing to: Docket Management
System, U.S. Department of
Transportation, Room PL–401, 400
Seventh Street, SW., Washington, DC
20590. You may call Docket
Management at: (202) 366–9324. You
may visit the Docket from 10 a.m. to 5
p.m. Monday through Friday.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Nita
Kavalauskas, Office of Regulatory
Analysis, Office of Planning, Evaluation
and Budget, National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration, U.S. Department
of Transportation, 400 Seventh Street,
SW., Washington, DC 20590. Telephone:
(202) 366–2584. Facsimile (fax): (202)
366–2559.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Section 610 of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act
A. Background and Purpose
Section 610 of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act of 1980 (Pub. L. 96–354),
as amended by the Small Business
Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of
1996 (Pub. L. 104–121), requires
agencies to conduct periodic reviews of
final rules that have a significant
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
23081
economic impact on a substantial
number of small business entities. The
purpose of the reviews is to determine
whether such rules should be continued
without change, or should be amended
or rescinded, consistent with the
objectives of applicable statutes, to
minimize any significant economic
impact of the rules on a substantial
number of such small entities.
B. Review Schedule
The Department of Transportation
(DOT) published its Semiannual
Regulatory Agenda on November 22,
1999, listing in Appendix D (64 FR
64684) those regulations that each
operating administration will review
under section 610 during the next 12
months. Appendix D also contains
DOT’s 10-year review plan for all of its
existing regulations.
The National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration (NHTSA, ‘‘we’’) has
divided its rules into 10 groups by
subject area. Each group will be
reviewed once every 10 years,
undergoing a two-stage process—an
Analysis Year and a Review Year. For
purposes of these reviews, a year will
coincide with the fall-to-fall publication
schedule of the Semiannual Regulatory
Agenda. Thus, Year 1 (1998) began in
the fall of 1998 and ended in the fall of
1999; Year 2 (1999) began in the fall of
1999 and ended in the fall of 2000; and
so on.
During the Analysis Year, we will
request public comment on and analyze
each of the rules in a given year’s group
to determine whether any rule has a
significant impact on a substantial
number of small entities and, thus,
requires review in accordance with
section 610 of the Regulatory Flexibility
Act. In each fall’s Regulatory Agenda,
we will publish the results of the
analyses we completed during the
previous year. For rules that have
subparts, or other discrete sections of
rules that do have a significant impact
on a substantial number of small
entities, we will announce that we will
be conducting a formal section 610
review during the following 12 months.
The section 610 review will
determine whether a specific rule
should be revised or revoked to lessen
its impact on small entities. We will
consider: (1) The continued need for the
rule; (2) the nature of complaints or
comments received from the public; (3)
the complexity of the rule; (4) the extent
to which the rule overlaps, duplicates,
or conflicts with other federal rules or
with state or local government rules;
and (5) the length of time since the rule
has been evaluated or the degree to
which technology, economic conditions,
E:\FR\FM\04MYP1.SGM
04MYP1
23082
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 85 / Wednesday, May 4, 2005 / Proposed Rules
or other factors have changed in the area
affected by the rule. At the end of the
Review Year, we will publish the results
of our review. The following table
shows the 10-year analysis and review
schedule:
NHTSA SECTION 610 REVIEW PLAN
Year
1 .............
2 .............
3 .............
4 .............
5 .............
6 .............
7 .............
8 .............
9 .............
10 ...........
Analysis
year
Regulations to be reviewed
49
49
49
49
49
49
49
49
49
23
CFR
CFR
CFR
CFR
CFR
CFR
CFR
CFR
CFR
CFR
parts 501 through 526 and 571.213 ..........................................................................................................
571.131, 571.217, 571.220, 571.221, and 571.222 ..................................................................................
571.101 through 571.110 and 571.135 .....................................................................................................
parts 529 through 579, except part 571 ....................................................................................................
571.111 through 571.129 and parts 580 through 588 ..............................................................................
571.201 through 571.212 ..........................................................................................................................
571.214 through 571.219, except 571.217 ...............................................................................................
parts 591 through 594 ...............................................................................................................................
571.223 through 571.404, part 500 and new parts and subparts under 49 CFR ....................................
parts 1200 and 1300 and new parts and subparts under 23 CFR ...........................................................
C. Regulations Under Analysis
If the agency determines that there is
a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities, it
will ask for comment in a subsequent
notice during the Review Year on how
these impacts could be reduced without
reducing safety.
During Year 7 (2004), the Analysis
Year, we will conduct a preliminary
assessment of the following sections of
49 CFR part 571:
Section
Title
II. Plain Language
571.214
571.216
571.218
571.219
Side impact protection.
Roof crush resistance.
Motorcycle helmets.
Windshield zone intrusion.
We are seeking comments on whether
any requirements in Parts 571.214,
571.216, 571.218, and 571.219 have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
‘‘Small entities’’ include small
businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and
operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions
with populations under 50,000.
Business entities are generally defined
as small businesses by Standard
Industrial Classification (SIC) code, for
the purposes of receiving Small
Business Administration (SBA)
assistance. Size standards established by
SBA in 13 CFR 121.201 are expressed
either in number of employees or
annual receipts in millions of dollars,
unless otherwise specified. The number
of employees or annual receipts
indicates the maximum allowed for a
concern and its affiliates to be
considered small. If your business or
organization is a small entity and if any
of the requirements in Parts 571.214,
571.216, 571.218, and 571.219 have a
significant economic impact on your
business or organization, please submit
a comment to explain how and to what
degree these rules affect you, the extent
of the economic impact on your
business or organization, and why you
believe the economic impact is
significant.
VerDate jul<14>2003
13:04 May 03, 2005
Jkt 205001
A. Background and Purpose
Executive Order 12866 and the
President’s memorandum of June 1,
1998, require each agency to write all
rules in plain language. Application of
the principles of plain language
includes consideration of the following
questions:
• Have we organized the material to
suit the public’s needs?
• Are the requirements in the rule
clearly stated?
• Does the rule contain technical
language or jargon that is not clear?
• Would a different format (grouping
and order of sections, use of headings,
paragraphing) make the rule easier to
understand?
• Would more (but shorter) sections
be better?
• Could we improve clarity by adding
tables, lists, or diagrams?
• What else could we do to make the
rule easier to understand?
If you have any responses to these
questions, please include them in your
comments on this document.
B. Review Schedule
In conjunction with our section 610
reviews, we will be performing plain
language reviews over a ten-year period
on a schedule consistent with the
section 610 review schedule. We will
review part 571 to determine if these
regulations can be reorganized and/or
rewritten to make them easier to read,
understand, and use. We encourage
interested persons to submit draft
regulatory language that clearly and
simply communicates regulatory
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Review
year
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
requirements, and other
recommendations, such as for putting
information in tables that may make the
regulations easier to use.
Comments
How Do I Prepare and Submit
Comments?
Your comments must be written and
in English. To ensure that your
comments are correctly filed in the
Docket, please include the docket
number of this document in your
comments.
Your comments must not be more
than 15 pages long. (49 CFR 553.21.) We
established this limit to encourage you
to write your primary comments in a
concise fashion. However, you may
attach necessary additional documents
to your comments. There is no limit on
the length of the attachments.
Please submit two copies of your
comments, including the attachments,
to Docket Management at the address
given above under ADDRESSES.
Comments may also be submitted to
the docket electronically by logging onto
the Docket Management System Web
site at https://dms.dot.gov. Click on
‘‘Help & Information’’ or ‘‘Help/Info’’ to
obtain instructions for filing your
comments electronically.
How Can I Be Sure That My Comments
Were Received?
If you wish Docket Management to
notify you upon its receipt of your
comments, enclose a self-addressed,
stamped postcard in the envelope
containing your comments. Upon
receiving your comments, Docket
Management will return the postcard by
mail.
How Do I Submit Confidential Business
Information?
If you wish to submit any information
under a claim of confidentiality, you
should submit three copies of your
E:\FR\FM\04MYP1.SGM
04MYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 85 / Wednesday, May 4, 2005 / Proposed Rules
complete submission, including the
information you claim to be confidential
business information, to the Chief
Counsel, NHTSA, U.S. Department of
Transportation, 400 Seventh Street,
SW., Washington, DC 20590. In
addition, you should submit two copies,
from which you have deleted the
claimed confidential business
information, to Docket Management at
the address given above under
ADDRESSES. When you send a comment
containing information claimed to be
confidential business information, you
should include a cover letter setting
forth the information specified in our
confidential business information
regulation. (49 CFR part 512.)
Will the Agency Consider Late
Comments?
We will consider all comments that
Docket Management receives before the
close of business on the comment
closing date indicated above under
DATES. To the extent possible, we will
also consider comments that Docket
Management receives after that date.
How Can I Read the Comments
Submitted by Other People?
You may read the comments received
by Docket Management at the address
given above under ADDRESSES. The
hours of the Docket are indicated above
in the same location.
You may also see the comments on
the Internet. To read the comments on
the Internet, take the following steps:
(1) Go to the Docket Management
System (DMS) Web page of the
Department of Transportation (https://
dms.dot.gov/).
(2) On that page, click on ‘‘search.’’
(3) On the next page (https://
dms.dot.gov/search/), type in the fourdigit docket number shown at the
beginning of this document. Example: If
the docket number were ‘‘NHTSA–
1998–1234,’’ you would type ‘‘1234.’’
After typing the docket number, click on
‘‘search.’’
(4) On the next page, which contains
docket summary information for the
docket you selected, click on the desired
comments. You may download the
comments. However, since the
comments are imaged documents,
instead of word processing documents,
the ‘‘pdf’’ versions of the documents are
word searchable.
Please note that even after the
comment closing date, we will continue
to file relevant information in the
Docket as it becomes available. Further,
some people may submit late comments.
Accordingly, we recommend that you
VerDate jul<14>2003
13:04 May 03, 2005
Jkt 205001
periodically check the Docket for new
material.
Joseph Carra,
Associate Administrator for National Center
for Statistics and Analysis.
[FR Doc. 05–8827 Filed 5–3–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–59–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
50 CFR Part 17
RIN 1018–AI15
Endangered and Threatened Wildlife
and Plants; Listing Roswell
Springsnail, Koster’s Springsnail,
Pecos Assiminea, and Noel’s
Amphipod as Endangered With Critical
Habitat
Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
ACTION: Revised proposed rule;
reopening of public comment period,
notice of availability of draft economic
analysis and draft environmental
assessment, updated legal descriptions
for critical habitat units.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service (Service), announce the
availability of the draft economic
analysis and draft environmental
assessment for the proposal to designate
critical habitat for the Roswell
springsnail (Pyrgulopsis roswellensis),
Koster’s springsnail (Juturnia kosteri),
Pecos assiminea (Assiminea pecos), and
Noel’s amphipod (Gammarus
desperatus) (four invertebrates) under
the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as
amended (Act). We are also reopening
the public comment period for the
proposal to list the four invertebrates as
endangered with critical habitat to allow
all interested parties an opportunity to
comment on and request changes to the
proposed listing and critical habitat
designation, as well as the associated
draft economic analysis and draft
environmental assessment. In addition,
we are proposing updated legal
descriptions for critical habitat units
using Geographic Information Systems
(GIS) coordinates. We invite all
interested parties to submit comments
on this proposal within the 30-day
comment period.
DATES: Comments must be submitted
directly to the Service (see ADDRESSES
section) on or before June 3, 2005.
ADDRESSES: If you wish to comment,
you may submit your comments and
materials by any one of several methods:
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
23083
1. You may submit written comments
and information to the Susan
MacMullin, Field Supervisor, New
Mexico Ecological Services Field Office,
2105 Osuna Road NE, Albuquerque,
New Mexico 87113.
2. You may hand-deliver written
comments and information to our New
Mexico Ecological Services Field Office,
at the above address, or fax your
comments to 505–346–2542.
3. You may send your comments by
electronic mail (e-mail) to
‘‘R2FWE_AL@fws.gov.’’ For directions
on how to submit electronic filing of
comments, see the ‘‘Public Comments
Solicited’’ section below.
You may obtain copies of the draft
economic analysis and draft
environmental assessment by mail by
contacting the person listed under FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT. You may
also view these documents in person,
review comments and materials
received, and review supporting
documentation used in preparation of
the proposed rule, by appointment,
during normal business hours, at the
New Mexico Ecological Services Field
Office at the address provided above.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Susan MacMullin, Field Supervisor,
New Mexico Ecological Services Field
Office (telephone 505–761–2525,
facsimile 505–346–2542).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Public Comments Solicited
We intend any final action resulting
from this proposal to be as accurate and
as effective as possible. Therefore, we
solicit comments or suggestions from
the public, other concerned
governmental agencies, the scientific
community, industry, or any other
interested party concerning this
proposed rule. We particularly seek
comments concerning:
(1) The reasons why any habitat
should or should not be determined to
be critical habitat as provided by section
4 of the Act, including whether the
benefits of designation will outweigh
any threats to the species resulting from
designation;
(2) Specific information on the
amount and distribution of the four
invertebrates’ habitat, and which habitat
is essential to the conservation of the
species and why;
(3) Land use designations and current
or planned activities in the subject area
and their possible impacts on the
species or proposed critical habitat;
(4) Whether our approach to listing or
critical habitat designation could be
improved or modified in any way to
provide for greater public participation
E:\FR\FM\04MYP1.SGM
04MYP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 85 (Wednesday, May 4, 2005)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 23081-23083]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-8827]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
49 CFR Part 571
[Docket No. NHTSA-05-21051]
Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards (FMVSS); Small Business
Impacts of Motor Vehicle Safety
AGENCY: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of regulatory review; request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA)
seeks comments on the economic impact of its regulations on small
entities. As required by Section 610 of the Regulatory Flexibility Act,
we are attempting to identify rules that may have a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. We also
request comments on ways to make these regulations easier to read and
understand. The focus of this notice is rules that specifically relate
to passenger cars, multipurpose passenger vehicles, trucks, buses,
trailers, incomplete vehicles, motorcycles, and motor vehicle
equipment.
DATES: Comments must be received on or before July 5, 2005.
ADDRESSES: You should mention the docket number of this document in
your comments and submit your comments in writing to: Docket Management
System, U.S. Department of Transportation, Room PL-401, 400 Seventh
Street, SW., Washington, DC 20590. You may call Docket Management at:
(202) 366-9324. You may visit the Docket from 10 a.m. to 5 p.m. Monday
through Friday.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Nita Kavalauskas, Office of Regulatory
Analysis, Office of Planning, Evaluation and Budget, National Highway
Traffic Safety Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, 400
Seventh Street, SW., Washington, DC 20590. Telephone: (202) 366-2584.
Facsimile (fax): (202) 366-2559.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Section 610 of the Regulatory Flexibility Act
A. Background and Purpose
Section 610 of the Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 (Pub. L. 96-
354), as amended by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness
Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), requires agencies to conduct periodic
reviews of final rules that have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small business entities. The purpose of the
reviews is to determine whether such rules should be continued without
change, or should be amended or rescinded, consistent with the
objectives of applicable statutes, to minimize any significant economic
impact of the rules on a substantial number of such small entities.
B. Review Schedule
The Department of Transportation (DOT) published its Semiannual
Regulatory Agenda on November 22, 1999, listing in Appendix D (64 FR
64684) those regulations that each operating administration will review
under section 610 during the next 12 months. Appendix D also contains
DOT's 10-year review plan for all of its existing regulations.
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA, ``we'')
has divided its rules into 10 groups by subject area. Each group will
be reviewed once every 10 years, undergoing a two-stage process--an
Analysis Year and a Review Year. For purposes of these reviews, a year
will coincide with the fall-to-fall publication schedule of the
Semiannual Regulatory Agenda. Thus, Year 1 (1998) began in the fall of
1998 and ended in the fall of 1999; Year 2 (1999) began in the fall of
1999 and ended in the fall of 2000; and so on.
During the Analysis Year, we will request public comment on and
analyze each of the rules in a given year's group to determine whether
any rule has a significant impact on a substantial number of small
entities and, thus, requires review in accordance with section 610 of
the Regulatory Flexibility Act. In each fall's Regulatory Agenda, we
will publish the results of the analyses we completed during the
previous year. For rules that have subparts, or other discrete sections
of rules that do have a significant impact on a substantial number of
small entities, we will announce that we will be conducting a formal
section 610 review during the following 12 months.
The section 610 review will determine whether a specific rule
should be revised or revoked to lessen its impact on small entities. We
will consider: (1) The continued need for the rule; (2) the nature of
complaints or comments received from the public; (3) the complexity of
the rule; (4) the extent to which the rule overlaps, duplicates, or
conflicts with other federal rules or with state or local government
rules; and (5) the length of time since the rule has been evaluated or
the degree to which technology, economic conditions,
[[Page 23082]]
or other factors have changed in the area affected by the rule. At the
end of the Review Year, we will publish the results of our review. The
following table shows the 10-year analysis and review schedule:
NHTSA Section 610 Review Plan
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Analysis Review
Year Regulations to be reviewed year year
------------------------------------------------------------------------
1.................... 49 CFR parts 501 through 526 1998 1999
and 571.213.
2.................... 49 CFR 571.131, 571.217, 1999 2000
571.220, 571.221, and
571.222.
3.................... 49 CFR 571.101 through 2000 2001
571.110 and 571.135.
4.................... 49 CFR parts 529 through 579, 2001 2002
except part 571.
5.................... 49 CFR 571.111 through 2002 2003
571.129 and parts 580
through 588.
6.................... 49 CFR 571.201 through 2003 2004
571.212.
7.................... 49 CFR 571.214 through 2004 2005
571.219, except 571.217.
8.................... 49 CFR parts 591 through 594. 2005 2006
9.................... 49 CFR 571.223 through 2006 2007
571.404, part 500 and new
parts and subparts under 49
CFR.
10................... 23 CFR parts 1200 and 1300 2007 2008
and new parts and subparts
under 23 CFR.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
C. Regulations Under Analysis
During Year 7 (2004), the Analysis Year, we will conduct a
preliminary assessment of the following sections of 49 CFR part 571:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Section Title
------------------------------------------------------------------------
571.214.......................... Side impact protection.
571.216.......................... Roof crush resistance.
571.218.......................... Motorcycle helmets.
571.219.......................... Windshield zone intrusion.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
We are seeking comments on whether any requirements in Parts
571.214, 571.216, 571.218, and 571.219 have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities. ``Small entities''
include small businesses, not-for-profit organizations that are
independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their fields,
and governmental jurisdictions with populations under 50,000. Business
entities are generally defined as small businesses by Standard
Industrial Classification (SIC) code, for the purposes of receiving
Small Business Administration (SBA) assistance. Size standards
established by SBA in 13 CFR 121.201 are expressed either in number of
employees or annual receipts in millions of dollars, unless otherwise
specified. The number of employees or annual receipts indicates the
maximum allowed for a concern and its affiliates to be considered
small. If your business or organization is a small entity and if any of
the requirements in Parts 571.214, 571.216, 571.218, and 571.219 have a
significant economic impact on your business or organization, please
submit a comment to explain how and to what degree these rules affect
you, the extent of the economic impact on your business or
organization, and why you believe the economic impact is significant.
If the agency determines that there is a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities, it will ask for
comment in a subsequent notice during the Review Year on how these
impacts could be reduced without reducing safety.
II. Plain Language
A. Background and Purpose
Executive Order 12866 and the President's memorandum of June 1,
1998, require each agency to write all rules in plain language.
Application of the principles of plain language includes consideration
of the following questions:
Have we organized the material to suit the public's needs?
Are the requirements in the rule clearly stated?
Does the rule contain technical language or jargon that is
not clear?
Would a different format (grouping and order of sections,
use of headings, paragraphing) make the rule easier to understand?
Would more (but shorter) sections be better?
Could we improve clarity by adding tables, lists, or
diagrams?
What else could we do to make the rule easier to
understand?
If you have any responses to these questions, please include them
in your comments on this document.
B. Review Schedule
In conjunction with our section 610 reviews, we will be performing
plain language reviews over a ten-year period on a schedule consistent
with the section 610 review schedule. We will review part 571 to
determine if these regulations can be reorganized and/or rewritten to
make them easier to read, understand, and use. We encourage interested
persons to submit draft regulatory language that clearly and simply
communicates regulatory requirements, and other recommendations, such
as for putting information in tables that may make the regulations
easier to use.
Comments
How Do I Prepare and Submit Comments?
Your comments must be written and in English. To ensure that your
comments are correctly filed in the Docket, please include the docket
number of this document in your comments.
Your comments must not be more than 15 pages long. (49 CFR 553.21.)
We established this limit to encourage you to write your primary
comments in a concise fashion. However, you may attach necessary
additional documents to your comments. There is no limit on the length
of the attachments.
Please submit two copies of your comments, including the
attachments, to Docket Management at the address given above under
ADDRESSES.
Comments may also be submitted to the docket electronically by
logging onto the Docket Management System Web site at https://
dms.dot.gov. Click on ``Help & Information'' or ``Help/Info'' to obtain
instructions for filing your comments electronically.
How Can I Be Sure That My Comments Were Received?
If you wish Docket Management to notify you upon its receipt of
your comments, enclose a self-addressed, stamped postcard in the
envelope containing your comments. Upon receiving your comments, Docket
Management will return the postcard by mail.
How Do I Submit Confidential Business Information?
If you wish to submit any information under a claim of
confidentiality, you should submit three copies of your
[[Page 23083]]
complete submission, including the information you claim to be
confidential business information, to the Chief Counsel, NHTSA, U.S.
Department of Transportation, 400 Seventh Street, SW., Washington, DC
20590. In addition, you should submit two copies, from which you have
deleted the claimed confidential business information, to Docket
Management at the address given above under ADDRESSES. When you send a
comment containing information claimed to be confidential business
information, you should include a cover letter setting forth the
information specified in our confidential business information
regulation. (49 CFR part 512.)
Will the Agency Consider Late Comments?
We will consider all comments that Docket Management receives
before the close of business on the comment closing date indicated
above under DATES. To the extent possible, we will also consider
comments that Docket Management receives after that date.
How Can I Read the Comments Submitted by Other People?
You may read the comments received by Docket Management at the
address given above under ADDRESSES. The hours of the Docket are
indicated above in the same location.
You may also see the comments on the Internet. To read the comments
on the Internet, take the following steps:
(1) Go to the Docket Management System (DMS) Web page of the
Department of Transportation (https://dms.dot.gov/).
(2) On that page, click on ``search.''
(3) On the next page (https://dms.dot.gov/search/), type in the
four-digit docket number shown at the beginning of this document.
Example: If the docket number were ``NHTSA-1998-1234,'' you would type
``1234.'' After typing the docket number, click on ``search.''
(4) On the next page, which contains docket summary information for
the docket you selected, click on the desired comments. You may
download the comments. However, since the comments are imaged
documents, instead of word processing documents, the ``pdf'' versions
of the documents are word searchable.
Please note that even after the comment closing date, we will
continue to file relevant information in the Docket as it becomes
available. Further, some people may submit late comments. Accordingly,
we recommend that you periodically check the Docket for new material.
Joseph Carra,
Associate Administrator for National Center for Statistics and
Analysis.
[FR Doc. 05-8827 Filed 5-3-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-59-P