Notice of Availability of Funds and Solicitation for Grant Applications (SGA) for Community-Based Job Training Grants, 22905-22924 [05-8772]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 84 / Tuesday, May 3, 2005 / Notices
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
[TA–W–56,695]
Tyco Electronics, Printed Circuit
Group, Stafford Division, Stafford,
Connecticut; Notice of Termination of
Investigation
Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade
Act of 1974, as amended, an
investigation was initiated on March 7,
2005, in response to a petition filed by
a State agency representative on behalf
of workers of Tyco Electronics, Printed
Circuit Group, Stafford Division,
Stafford, Connecticut.
The petitioner has requested that the
petition be withdrawn. Consequently,
the investigation has been terminated.
Signed in Washington, DC this 15th day of
April 2005.
Linda G. Poole,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade
Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E5–2116 Filed 5–2–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–30–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
[TA–W–55,891 and TA–W–55,891A]
Wilsonart International, Inc., a
Subsidiary of ITW, Temple, TX,
Including an Employee of Wilsonart
International, Inc. Located in Atlanta,
GA; Amended Certification Regarding
Eligibility To Apply for Worker
Adjustment Assistance and Alternative
Trade Adjustment Assistance
In accordance with Section 223 of the
Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2273) the
Department of Labor issued a
Certification Regarding Eligibility to
Apply for Worker Adjustment
Assistance and Alternative Trade
Adjustment Assistance on December 9,
2004, applicable to workers of Wilsonart
International, Inc., a subsidiary of ITW,
Temple, Texas. The notice was
published in the Federal Register on
January 24, 2005 (70 FR 3392).
At the request of the State agency, the
Department reviewed the certification
for workers of the subject firm. New
information shows that a worker
separation occurred involving an
employee of the Temple, Texas facility
of Wilsonart International, Inc., a
subsidiary of ITW located in Atlanta,
Georgia. Ms. Miclene McGhee provided
customer support services for the
production of high-pressure decorative
VerDate jul<14>2003
15:43 May 02, 2005
Jkt 205001
laminate used in kitchen counter tops
and cabinets at the Temple, Texas
location of the subject firm.
Based on these findings, the
Department is amending this
certification to include an employee of
the Temple, Texas facility of Wilsonart
International, Inc., a subsidiary of ITW,
located in Atlanta, Georgia and to also
extend ATAA eligibility to Ms. Miclene
McGhee located in Atlanta, Georgia.
The intent of the Department’s
certification is to include all workers of
Wilsonart International, Inc., a
subsidiary of ITW, Temple, Texas, who
were adversely affected by a shift in
production to India and Thailand.
The amended notice applicable to
TA–W–55,891 is hereby issued as
follows:
All workers of Wilsonart International,
Inc., a subsidiary of ITW, Temple, Texas
(TA–W–55,891), including an employee of
Wilsonart International, Inc., a subsidiary of
ITW, Temple, Texas, located in Atlanta,
Georgia (TA–W–55,891A), who became
totally or partially separated from
employment on or after October 21, 2003,
through December 9, 2006, are eligible to
apply for adjustment assistance under
Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, and are
also eligible to apply for alternative trade
adjustment assistance under Section 246 of
the Trade Act of 1974, as amended.
Signed at Washington, DC, this 26th day of
April 2005.
Linda G. Poole,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade
Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E5–2130 Filed 5–2–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–30–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
[TA–W–56,851]
Xerox Corporation, Business Group
Operations Workers Producing Base
Finisher Module Webster, NY; Notice
of Termination of Investigation
Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade
Act of 1974, as amended, an
investigation was initiated on March 30,
2005 in response to a worker petition
filed on behalf of workers producing
Base Finisher Modules at Business
Group Operations of Xerox Corporation,
Webster, New York.
The petitioning group of workers is
covered by an active certification, TA–
W–53,004, which expires on October 20,
2005. Consequently, further
investigation in this case would serve
no purpose, and the investigation has
been terminated.
PO 00000
Frm 00065
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
22905
Signed at Washington, DC this 12th day of
April, 2005.
Elliott S. Kushner,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade
Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 05–8911 Filed 4–28–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–30–M
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
Notice of Availability of Funds and
Solicitation for Grant Applications
(SGA) for Community-Based Job
Training Grants
Announcement type: New. Notice of
Solicitation for Grant Applications.
Funding Opportunity Number: SGA/
DFA–PY–04–10.
Catalog of Federal Assistance
Number: 17.261.
Key Dates: The closing date for receipt
of applications under this
announcement is July 6, 2005.
Applications must be received at the
address below no later than 5 p.m.
(eastern time). Application and
submission information is explained in
detail in Section IV of this SGA. Virtual
Prospective Applicant Conferences will
be held for this grant competition. The
dates and access information for these
prospective applicant conferences will
be posted on ETA’s Web site at https://
www.doleta.gov/business/CommunityBasedJobTrainingGrants.cfm.
SUMMARY: The Employment and
Training Administration (ETA), U.S.
Department of Labor (DOL), announces
the availability of approximately $125
million in grant funds for CommunityBased Job Training Grants.
Community-Based Job Training
Grants will be awarded through a
competitive process to support
workforce training for high-growth
industries through the national system
of community and technical colleges.
The primary purpose of these grants is
to build the capacity of community
colleges to train workers to develop the
skills required to succeed in (i) local
industries and occupations that are
expected to experience high growth and
(ii) industries where demand for
qualified workers is outstripping the
supply. Funds will be awarded to
community colleges to engage in a
combination of capacity building and
training activities targeted at highgrowth or high-demand industries in the
local economy.
In awarding Community-Based Job
Training Grants, every effort will be
made to fairly distribute grants across
rural and urban areas and across the
E:\FR\FM\03MYN1.SGM
03MYN1
22906
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 84 / Tuesday, May 3, 2005 / Notices
different geographic regions of the
United States. It is anticipated that
individual awards will range in amount
from $500,000 to $2 million. A second
solicitation is anticipated for Fall/
Winter 2005.
This solicitation provides background
information and describes the
application submission requirements,
outlines the process that eligible entities
must use to apply for funds covered by
this solicitation, and details how
grantees will be selected.
ADDRESSES: Mailed applications must be
addressed to the U.S. Department of
Labor, Employment and Training
Administration, Division of Federal
Assistance, Attention: Eric Luetkenhaus,
Grant Officer, Reference SGA/DFA–PY–
04–10, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW.,
Room N–4438, Washington, DC 20210.
Telefacsimile (FAX) applications will
not be accepted. Information about
applying online can be found in Section
IV (C) of this document. Applicants are
advised that mail delivery in the
Washington area may be delayed due to
mail decontamination procedures. Hand
delivered proposals will be received at
the above address.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
This solicitation consists of eight
parts:
• Part I provides background
information.
• Part II describes the size and nature
of the anticipated awards.
• Part III describes eligible applicants
and other grant specifications.
• Part IV provides information on the
application and submission process.
• Part V describes the criteria against
which applications will be reviewed
and explains the proposal review
process.
• Part VI provides award
administration information.
• Part VII contains DOL agency
contact information.
• Part VIII lists additional resources
of interest to applicants.
I. Funding Opportunity Description
The Community-Based Job Training
Grants (CBJTGs) are designed to support
workforce training for high-growth
industries through the national system
of community and technical colleges.
The primary purpose of these grants is
to build the capacity of community
colleges to train workers to develop the
skills required to succeed in (i) local
industries and occupations that are
expected to experience high growth and
(ii) industries where demand for
qualified workers is outstripping the
supply. Part 1 of this section provides
an overview of ETA’s demand-driven
VerDate jul<14>2003
15:43 May 02, 2005
Jkt 205001
workforce investment strategies. Part 2
provides background information on the
principles underlying the CBJTGs. Part
3 describes critical elements of the
grants themselves.
1. The Employment and Training
Administration’s Demand-Driven
Workforce Investment Strategies
Each year, the federal government
invests over $15 billion in a state and
local network of resources, known as
the workforce investment system, to
assist businesses in recruiting, training,
and retaining a skilled workforce. While
these investments have in the past
supported a set of standard menu-driven
services for employers and workers, the
realities of today’s rapidly changing
global economy make it imperative that
the workforce investment system
support customized activities that are
driven by local employer demand. This
demand-driven approach to workforce
development is necessary to prepare
workers to take advantage of new and
increasing job opportunities in highgrowth/high-demand and economically
vital industries and sectors of the
American economy.
In a demand-driven workforce
investment system, state and local
Workforce Investment Boards invest
strategically in workforce development
activities that are relevant to the
requirements of local industry and have
a long-term impact on the ability of the
community to meet local workforce
demands. To do so, they bring to the
table critical collaborative partners in
the development of America’s
workforce: employers and education
and training providers.
Within the context of these strategic
partnerships, communities use a
solutions-based approach to workforce
development planning, in which the
partnering entities work through the
cycle of: (1) Collecting and analyzing
information about local workforce needs
and critical capacity constraints; (2)
incorporating a business or demanddriven perspective into issue
identification and solutions
development; (3) ensuring that the right
strategic partners are at the table; (4)
working collaboratively to explore,
frame, and implement solutions; and (5)
assessing how the products and
outcomes of the project can be
effectively deployed and replicated. The
goal of this process is to ensure that the
proposed project will ultimately
succeed in resolving the industryidentified workforce challenge.
The solutions-based approach engages
each collaborative partner in its area of
strength. Industry representatives and
employers define workforce challenges
PO 00000
Frm 00066
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
facing the industry and identify the
competencies and skills required for the
industry’s workforce. The workforce
investment system provides access to
human capital (youth, unemployed,
underemployed, incumbent workers,
and dislocated workers), assists with
training programs, and places trained
workers in jobs. Community colleges
and other training providers assist in
developing competency models and
training curricula and train new and
incumbent workers. The K–12 public
education system ensures that
investments at the community college
are part of a continuum of education
and training leading to successful skill
development.
ETA first modeled the power of these
strategic partnerships through the
President’s High Growth Job Training
Initiative (High Growth Initiative). The
High Growth Initiative is a strategic
effort to prepare workers for new and
increasing job opportunities in highgrowth/high-demand and economically
vital industries and sectors of the
American economy. Through the
initiative, ETA identifies high-growth/
high-demand industries, evaluates their
skills needs, and funds local and
national partnership-based
demonstration projects that provide
workforce solutions to ensure that
individuals can gain the skills to get
good jobs in these rapidly expanding or
transforming industries. The products,
models and effective approaches that
result from the High Growth Initiative
will be broadly disseminated to
employers, education and training
providers, and the workforce investment
system to build their capacity to
respond to employer demands.
2. Background on the Community-Based
Job Training Grants
The Community-Based Job Training
Grants (CBJTGs) continue the work of
the High Growth Initiative by
incorporating its focus on high-growth,
high-demand industries and its
emphasis on the role of strategic
partnerships in workforce development.
The CBJTGs build on the work of the
High Growth Initiative by highlighting
the critical role community colleges
play as partners in the demand-driven
workforce investment system, and by
supporting community efforts to link
training initiatives to the skill demands
of local employers. As a result, CBJTG
activities will lead to an increased
number of high-growth firms being
supported by the local workforce and
education systems, and more
individuals being trained and employed
in high-growth sectors.
E:\FR\FM\03MYN1.SGM
03MYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 84 / Tuesday, May 3, 2005 / Notices
emphasizes a workforce system driven
by the needs of local employers. In
order for America to remain competitive
in the global economy, it is essential
that ETA target its investments to
support employers in high-growth/highdemand industries. Community colleges
play a vital role in this effort by
providing training to address the
workforce needs of these industries. A
high-growth/high-demand industry
meets one or more of the following
criteria: (1) Is projected to add
substantial numbers of new jobs to the
economy; (2) has a significant impact on
the economy overall; (3) impacts the
growth of other industries; (4) is being
transformed by technology and
innovation requiring new skill sets for
workers; or (5) is a new and emerging
business that is projected to grow.
B. Strategic Partnerships. ETA
believes that strategic partnerships
between community colleges, the
workforce investment system, business
and industry, and the continuum of
education, including the K–12 system,
need to be in place in order to
implement effective demand-driven
training and capacity building
strategies. These strategic partnerships
may have a local, regional, or statewide
focus, and may include a consortium of
partners or cross-industry
representatives. Specific requirements
for strategic partnerships are outlined in
Section III (3). These strategic
partnerships should focus broadly on
the workforce challenges of one or more
high-growth, high-demand industries
and work collaboratively to identify and
implement solutions to those
challenges. These solutions should
include, among others, strategies to
increase the capacity of local
community colleges to educate and train
more workers with industry-defined
skills and competencies. Therefore, the
3. Critical Elements of Communityinvestment in community college
Based Job Training Grants
capacity building would be one of many
It is ETA’s expectation that CBJTGs
strategies and solutions that evolve from
will contain at least six critical
the partnership. While ETA welcomes
elements. These elements consist of: (A) applications from newly formed
Focus on skill and competency needs of strategic partnerships, applicants are
local high-growth/high-demand
advised that grant funds may not be
industries; (B) strategic partnerships; (C) used for partnership development.
industry-driven capacity building and
Within the context of the broader
training efforts; (D) leveraged resources; strategic partnership and as it relates to
this grant, each collaborative partner
(E) replication; and (F) clear and
specific outcomes. These characteristics should have clearly defined roles. Each
are reflected in the evaluation criteria in partner should verify their role through
a letter of commitment attached to the
Part V and are described in further
proposal. The exact nature of these roles
detail below. For examples of projects
that integrate these elements, please see may vary depending on the issue areas
being addressed and the scope and
Appendix A.
A. Focus on skill and competency
nature of the activities undertaken.
needs of local high-growth/high-demand However, ETA expects that each
collaborative partner will, at minimum,
industries. The Workforce Investment
contribute in the following ways.
Act of 1998 (Pub. L. 105–220) (WIA)
Community colleges represent a
critical 21st century training resource
for workers needing to attain, retool,
refine, and broaden their skills to meet
industry demand. According to the
Bureau of Labor Statistics, eighty
percent of the fastest growing jobs in the
United States require some level of postsecondary education. The accessibility
and affordability of community college
training, combined with the adaptability
of community college curricula to
changing skill needs, make community
colleges a vital training resource for
many U.S. workers. Furthermore,
community colleges are closely
connected to local labor markets,
making them well-positioned to prepare
workers for good jobs with good wages
in the local economy.
However, community college leaders
and industry executives report that
many community colleges are unable to
meet local demand for training because
of critical capacity constraints. These
capacity constraints occur when
community colleges lack sufficient
resources to support training facilities
and equipment, curriculum
development, faculty appointments,
clinical experiences, and/or other
elements that are necessary to provide
either the volume or quality of training
that industry requires. Despite rising
application rates, the reality of current
state and local budgets often prevents
colleges from funding the programs,
faculty, and student services they need
to be responsive to local workforce
demands.
The CBJTGs will address this critical
capacity issue. Funds will be awarded
to community colleges to engage in a
combination of capacity building and
training activities targeted at highgrowth or high-demand industries in the
local economy.
VerDate jul<14>2003
15:43 May 02, 2005
Jkt 205001
PO 00000
Frm 00067
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
22907
Employers should be actively engaged
and participate fully in every aspect of
grant activities including: defining the
program strategy and goals; identifying
needed skills and competencies;
designing training approaches and
curricula; implementing the program;
contributing financial support; and,
where appropriate, hiring qualified
training graduates. The K–12 education
system is an important foundational
partner to ensure the project’s activities
are tied to the broader continuum of
education in the community. The
workforce investment system, which
may include state and local Workforce
Investment Boards, State Workforce
Agencies, and One-Stop Career Centers
and their cooperating partners, as such
terms are defined under WIA, may play
a number of roles, including: identifying
and assessing candidates for training;
working collaboratively to leverage WIA
investments; referring qualified
candidates to the community college for
enrollment; providing wrap-around
support services, where appropriate;
and referring qualified training
graduates to employers with existing job
openings.
In order to maximize the success of
the project and to keep pace with the
rapid changes in the economy and the
nature of the skills and competencies
necessary for work in these industries,
these strategic partnerships need to be
substantial and sustained. ETA
encourages partners to plan for
sustainability of the partnership to
enable ongoing assessment of industry
workforce needs and collaborative
development of solutions on an ongoing
basis.
C. Industry-driven capacity building
and training efforts. All CBJTGs must
develop and implement a combination
of capacity building and training
activities that target skills and
competencies demanded by local highgrowth/high-demand industries.
Applicants are not limited in the
strategies and approaches they may
employ to implement their capacity
building and training strategies,
provided the activities meet the
following requirements:
(1) Training. Training activities must:
(a) Occur within the context of a
continuum of education and training
that supports long-term career growth,
such as an articulated career ladder/
lattice and (b) result in college credit or
other credentials that are industryrecognized and indicate a level of
mastery and competence in a given field
or function. The credential awarded to
participants upon completion should be
based on the type of training provided
through the grant and the requirements
E:\FR\FM\03MYN1.SGM
03MYN1
22908
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 84 / Tuesday, May 3, 2005 / Notices
of the targeted occupation, and should
be selected based on consultations with
industry partners. For example:
a. Customized and short-term training
should result in a performance-based
certification or certificate. This
certification may be developed jointly
by employers and the community
college, based on defined knowledge
and skill requirements for specific highdemand occupations/functions.
Performance-based certifications may
also be based on industry-recognized
curriculum and standards.
b. Training in information technology,
allied health professions, and other
fields with established professional
standards and examinations should
result in certification.
c. In states where licensure is required
for the specific occupation targeted by
the training, the credentialing
requirement should be set accordingly.
d. In some instances, training
provided under CBJTGs may lead to a
degree. In these instances, the credential
required will be credit for each course
leading to an Associate’s or Applied
Associate’s degree.
(2) Capacity Building. Community
colleges are encouraged to broadly
assess their capacity to meet the training
needs of the targeted high-growth/highdemand industry or industries.
Proposed capacity building strategies
are expected to address significant
barriers which impede the ability of the
community college to meet local
industry demand for workforce training.
These strategies should not simply
address isolated deficits, but rather
provide a comprehensive solution to
identified capacity challenges as they
relate to the industry or industries of
focus. Examples of capacity building
activities include, but are not limited to:
a. The development or adaptation of
competency models and curricula to
support training;
b. The development of innovative
curricula, teaching methods and
instructional design to maximize the
impact of the initiative in meeting the
skills needs of employers;
c. Innovative strategies to ensure
availability of qualified and certified
instructors;
d. Procurement of equipment and
simulation equipment necessary to train
to industry-demanded skills; or
e. Support for clinical experiences
required for certification or licensure.
Capacity building activities must meet
two criteria: (1) The proposed capacity
building efforts must be directly linked
to the specific training supported under
the grant; and (2) grantees must use
their grant funds in a manner consistent
with the regulations and policies
VerDate jul<14>2003
15:43 May 02, 2005
Jkt 205001
governing use of funds under 171(d) of
WIA, which broadly allows the funds to
be utilized to test an array of approaches
to the provision of training services and
support the development and
replication of effective training
strategies.
D. Leveraged Resources. Projects
funded through CBJTGs should leverage
resources from key entities in the
strategic partnership. Leveraging
resources in the context of strategic
partnerships accomplishes three goals:
(1) It allows for the strategic pursuit of
resources; (2) it increases stakeholder
investment in the project at all levels
including design and implementation
phases; and (3) it broadens the impact
of the project itself. Applicants are
encouraged to leverage significant
resources from key partners and other
organizations to maximize the impact of
the project on the community.
ETA strongly encourages CBJTG
applicants and their strategic partners to
be entrepreneurial as they seek out,
utilize, and sustain these resources,
whether they are in-kind or cash
contributions, when creating capacity
building and training strategies.
Businesses, faith-based and community
organizations, and foundations often
invest resources to support workforce
development. Faith-based and
community organizations may provide
resources such as support services,
mentoring, tutoring, and volunteers, all
of which are important resources for
grantees to leverage in assisting the
populations targeted by these funds. In
addition, other government programs,
including the Department of Education,
the Department of Commerce, and other
ETA programs, such as registered
apprenticeship and Job Corps, may have
resources available that can be
integrated into the proposed project.
ETA also encourages applicants to
integrate WIA funding at the state and
local level into their proposed project.
Integrating WIA funds ensures that the
full spectrum of assets available from
the workforce system is leveraged to
support the capacity building and
training activities. The wide variety of
WIA programs and activities provide
both breadth and depth to the proposed
solution offered to both business and
individuals. The use of WIA funds also
serves to embed the solutions-based
approach into the local or regional
workforce investment system, which
strengthens the system’s ability to
become more demand-driven.
E. Replication. CBJTGs are intended
to drive the community college system
and the workforce investment system to
be more responsive to the workforce
demands of industry by making the
PO 00000
Frm 00068
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
products, models, and effective
approaches that result from CBJTG
investments available to both systems.
To that end, grantees will develop the
foundations and outcomes of CBJTG
projects, including the learning and
achievement resulting from the projects,
into solutions-based models that can be
shared with, and implemented by, other
community colleges, the workforce
system, and industry leaders.
F. Outcomes. The CBJTGs will be
fundamentally results-oriented.
Therefore, clear and specific outcomes
that are appropriate to the nature of the
proposed activities and the size of the
project are vital components of CBJTG
projects. Because CBJTGs invest in
customized strategies to address local
workforce and skills shortages, ETA
recognizes that specific outcomes will
vary from project to project based on the
specific activities proposed. Training
outcomes should include those tracked
by the Common Measures, the OMBapproved uniform evaluation metrics for
job training and employment programs.
A detailed description of ETA’s policy
on the Common Measures can be found
in the Training and Employment
Guidance Letter (TEGL) No. 28–04
(https://wdr.doleta.gov/directives/attach/
TEGL28–04.pdf). A basic list of
Common Measures is provided as
attachment B to the TEGL (https://
wdr.doleta.gov/directives/attach/
TEGL28–04_AttachB.pdf). Capacity
building outcomes should include
products, models, and activities that
increase the capacity of the community
college to provide training as well as the
impact each outcome has on the number
of individuals the community college
can train and/or the quality of that
training. Outcomes and impacts of the
proposed project should satisfactorily
address the industry-identified
workforce need and the community
college capacity constraint identified by
the partnership.
II. Award Information
1. Award Amount
ETA intends to fund approximately
seventy-five (75) projects through grants
ranging from $500,000 to $2 million
through this competition; however, this
does not preclude ETA from funding
grants at either a lower or higher
amount, or funding a smaller or larger
number of projects, based on the type
and the number of quality submissions.
Applicants are encouraged to submit
budgets for quality projects at whatever
funding level is appropriate to the
project. Nevertheless, applicants should
recognize that the funds available
through this SGA are intended to
E:\FR\FM\03MYN1.SGM
03MYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 84 / Tuesday, May 3, 2005 / Notices
complement additional leveraged
resources rather than be the sole source
of funds for the proposal. A second
competition planned for Fall/Winter
2005 will request applications for the
funding of additional projects.
2. Period of Performance
ETA intends that the initial period of
grant performance will fall within a
range of 24 to 36 months from the date
of execution of the grant documents.
However, ETA will determine an
appropriate period of performance on a
per-award basis that will allow for the
completion of capacity building and
training efforts, and allow time for posttraining participant tracking in the
workplace.
III. Eligibility Information
1. Eligible Applicants
In order to be eligible for
consideration under this solicitation,
the applicant must be a publicly funded
institution of higher education that
grants associate degrees. Therefore,
applicants must demonstrate that they
comply with the definition of a
community college in 20 U.S.C. 2371:
The term ‘‘community college’’—(A) means
an institution of higher education [as defined
in 20 U.S.C. 1001] that provides not less than
a 2-year program that is acceptable for full
credit towards a bachelor’s degree; and (B)
includes tribally controlled colleges and
universities.
Applicants that fail to meet this
eligibility requirement will be removed
from consideration prior to the technical
review process. Please note: (1) The
applicant and fiscal agent for this grant
initiative must be the same entity; and
(2) in accordance with Section 18 of the
Lobbying Disclosure Act of 1995 (Pub.
L. 104–65) (2 U.S.C. 1611), non-profit
entities incorporated under Internal
Revenue Service Code section 501(c)(4)
that engage in lobbying activities are not
eligible to receive Federal funds and
grants.
2. Cost Sharing or Matching
Cost sharing, matching, or cost
participation is not required for
eligibility; however, applicants are
encouraged to leverage the resources of
the partnership whenever possible.
3. Other Grant Specifications
(1) Demonstrated Partnerships. To be
considered for funding under this SGA,
the applicant must demonstrate that the
proposed project will be implemented
by a strategic partnership that includes
at least one entity from each of the
following categories: (1) The publiclyfunded Workforce Investment System,
VerDate jul<14>2003
15:43 May 02, 2005
Jkt 205001
which may include state and local
Workforce Investment Boards, State
Workforce Agencies, and One Stop
Career Centers and their partners; (2) the
community college system; (3)
employers and industry-related
organizations such as associations and
unions; and (4) the continuum of
education, including the K–12 public
education system. The strategic
partnership may be a legally organized
partnership or joint venture, or a more
informal collaboration. As discussed
above in Section III(1), the applicant
itself, for the purpose of being bound in
the grant application and any resulting
award, must be a publicly funded
community college.
(2) Required Capacity Building and
Training Activities. To be considered for
funding under this SGA, proposed grant
activities must include a combination of
capacity building and training activities
that target skills and competencies
demanded by local high-growth/highdemand industries. Training activities
must result in college credit or other
credentials that are industry-recognized
and indicate a level of mastery and
competence in a given field or function.
Proposed capacity building activities
must address barriers that impede the
ability of the community college to meet
local industry demand for workforce
training and must be directly linked to
the specific training supported under
the grant. Applicants may propose a
cross-cutting capacity building and
training strategy that will support
training in more than one high growth/
high demand industry if the applicant
can demonstrate that skill needs in the
identified industries are shared.
(3) Participants Eligible to Receive
Training. Generally, the scope of
potential trainees is very broad. WIA
Sec. 171(d) authorizes demonstration
programs to serve dislocated workers,
incumbent workers, and new entrants to
the workforce. This authorization
supports a broad range of training for a
variety of populations, including:
Incumbent workers who need new skills
for jobs in demand up the career ladder
or because the skill needs for their
current job have changed; untapped
labor pools such as immigrant workers,
individuals with disabilities, veterans,
older workers, youth, etc; or entry level
workers who need basic skills and/or
specific occupational skill training. The
identification of targeted and qualified
trainees should be part of the larger
project planning process undertaken by
the required partnership and should
relate to the workforce issue that is
being addressed by the training.
(4) Training Providers. The
community college applicant must offer
PO 00000
Frm 00069
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
22909
appropriate credentials for all proposed
training. Generally, it is assumed that
the applicant will also be the training
provider. However, ETA encourages
applicants to be creative in integrating
partner resources into the training plan.
For example: A business partner may
provide a qualified instructor to the
community college; the community
college may provide on-site training for
workers to take advantage of businessloaned equipment; the training may be
provided jointly; or some of the training
may utilize distance learning
alternatives.
(5) Veterans Priority. In circumstances
where a grant recipient must choose
between two equally qualified
candidates for training, one of whom is
a veteran, the Jobs for Veterans Act
(Pub. L. 107–288) requires that grant
recipients give the veteran priority of
service by admitting him or her. The
Jobs for Veterans Act provides priority
of service to veterans and spouses of
certain veterans for the receipt of
employment, training, and placement
services in any job training program
directly funded, in whole or in part, by
the Department of Labor. Please note
that, to obtain priority of service, a
veteran must meet the program’s
eligibility requirements. ETA Training
and Employment Guidance Letter
(TEGL) No. 5–03 (September 16, 2003)
provides general guidance on the scope
of the Job for Veterans Act and its effect
on current employment and training
programs. TEGL No. 5–03, along with
additional guidance, is available at the
‘‘Jobs for Veterans Priority of Service’’
Web site (https://www.doleta.gov/
programs/vets).
IV. Application and Submission
Information
1. Address To Request Application
Package
This SGA contains all of the
information and forms needed to apply
for grant funding.
2. Content and Form of Application
Submission
The proposal must consist of two (2)
separate and distinct parts, Parts I and
II. Applications that fail to adhere to the
instructions in this section will be
considered non-responsive and may not
be given further consideration.
Part I of the proposal is the Cost
Proposal and must include the
following three items.
• The Standard Form (SF) 424,
‘‘Application for Federal Assistance’’
(Appendix B) (available at https://
www.whitehouse.gov/omb/grants/
sf424.pdf). The SF 424 must clearly
E:\FR\FM\03MYN1.SGM
03MYN1
22910
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 84 / Tuesday, May 3, 2005 / Notices
identify the applicant and be signed by
an individual with authority to enter
into a grant agreement. Upon
confirmation of an award, the
individual signing the SF 424 on behalf
of the applicant shall be considered the
representative of the applicant.
• All applicants for federal grant and
funding opportunities are required to
have a Dun and Bradstreet (DUNS)
number. See Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) Notice of Final Policy
Issuance, 68 FR 38402 (June 27, 2003).
Applicants must supply their DUNS
number in item #5 of the new SF 424
issued by OMB (Rev. 9–2003). The
DUNS number is a nine-digit
identification number that uniquely
identifies business entities. Obtaining a
DUNS number is easy and there is no
charge. To obtain a DUNS number,
access this Web site:
https://www.dunandbradstreet.com or
call 1–866–705–5711.
• SF 424A, the Budget Information
Form (Appendix C) (available at
https://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/grants/
sf424a.pdf). In preparing the Budget
Information Form, the applicant must
provide a concise narrative explanation
to support the request. The budget
narrative should break down the budget
and leveraged resources by deliverable,
should discuss cost per-participant, and
should discuss precisely how the
administrative costs support the project
goals.
Please note that applicants that fail to
provide a SF 424, SF 424A and/or a
budget narrative will be removed from
consideration prior to the technical
review process. Applicants are also
encouraged, but not required, to submit
OMB Survey N. 1890–0014: Survey on
Ensuring Equal Opportunity for
Applicants, which can be found in
Attachment D.
Part II of the application is the
Technical Proposal, which demonstrates
the applicant’s capabilities to plan and
implement the CBJTG in accordance
with the provisions of this solicitation.
The Technical Proposal is limited to
twenty (20) double-spaced, single-sided,
8.5 inch x 11 inch pages with 12 point
text font and one-inch margins. In
addition, in attachments which may not
exceed ten (10) pages, the applicant may
provide resumes, a list of staff positions
to be funded by the grant, statistical
information and other related material.
The required letters of commitment
from partners must be submitted as
additional attachments, which will not
count against the allowable 10-page
limit on attachments. The applicant
must reference any partners in the text
of the Technical Proposal. No cost data
or reference to prices should be
VerDate jul<14>2003
15:43 May 02, 2005
Jkt 205001
included in the Technical Proposal. The
following information is required:
• A two-page abstract summarizing
the proposed project and applicant
profile information including: Applicant
name, project title, industry focus,
partnership members, proposed training
and capacity building activities, funding
level requested, and the amount of
leveraged resources;
• A table of contents listing the
application sections;
• A time line outlining project
activities and an anticipated schedule
for deliverables; and
• A project description as described
in the Evaluation Criteria section at Part
V(1) of this solicitation.
Please note that the abstract, table of
contents, and time line are not included
in the twenty page limit. Applications
that do not provide Part II of the
application will be removed from
consideration prior to the technical
review process.
Applications may be submitted
electronically on Grants.gov or in hardcopy via mail or hand delivery. These
processes are described in further detail
in section IV(3). Applicants submitting
proposals in hard-copy must submit an
original signed application (including
the SF 424) and one (1) ‘‘copy-ready’’
version free of bindings, staples or
protruding tabs to ease in the
reproduction of the proposal by DOL.
Applicants submitting proposals in
hard-copy are also requested, though
not required, to provide an electronic
copy of the proposal on CD–ROM.
3. Submission Date, Times, and
Addresses
The closing date for receipt of
applications under this announcement
is July 6, 2005. Applications must be
received at the address below no later
than 5 p.m. (Eastern Time).
Applications sent by e-mail, telegram, or
facsimile (fax) will not be accepted.
Applications that do not meet the
conditions set forth in this notice will
not be honored. No exceptions to the
mailing and delivery requirements set
forth in this notice will be granted.
ETA will host CHJTG Virtual
Prospective Applicant Conferences for
this grant competition. The dates and
access information for these prospective
applicant conferences will be posted on
ETA’s Web site at https://
www.doleta.gov/business/CommunityBasedJobTrainingGrants.cfm.
Mailed applications must be
addressed to the U.S. Department of
Labor, Employment and Training
Administration, Division of Federal
Assistance, Attention: Eric Luetkenhaus,
Grant Officer, Reference SGA/DFA–PY–
PO 00000
Frm 00070
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
04–10, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW.,
Room N–4438, Washington, DC 20210.
Applicants are advised that mail
delivery in the Washington area may be
delayed due to mail decontamination
procedures. Hand delivered proposals
will be received at the above address.
All overnight mail will be considered to
be hand-delivered and must be received
at the designated place by the specified
closing date.
Applicants may apply online through
Grants.gov (https://www.grants.gov). It is
strongly recommended that applicants
using Grants.gov immediately initiate
and complete the ‘‘Get Started’’
registration steps at https://
www.grants.gov/GetStarted. These steps
may take multiple days to complete, and
this time should be factored into plans
for electronic application submission in
order to avoid facing unexpected delays
that could result in the rejection of an
application. If submitting electronically
through grants.gov, it would be
appreciated if the application submitted
is saved as .doc, .pdf or .txt files
Late Applications: Any application
received after the exact date and time
specified for receipt at the office
designated in this notice will not be
considered, unless it is received before
awards are made and it (a) was sent by
U.S. Postal Service registered or
certified mail not later than the fifth
calendar day before the date specified
for receipt of applications (e.g., an
application required to be received by
the 20th of the month must be post
marked by the 15th of that month) or (b)
was sent by U.S. Postal Service Express
Mail or Grants.gov to the addressee not
later than 5 p.m. at the place of mailing
or electronic submission one working
day prior to the date specified for
receipt of applications. It is highly
recommended that online submissions
be completed one working day prior to
the date specified for receipt of
applications to ensure that the applicant
still has the option to submit by U.S.
Postal Service Express Mail in the event
of any electronic submission problems.
‘‘Post marked’’ means a printed,
stamped or otherwise placed impression
(exclusive of a postage meter machine
impression) that is readily identifiable,
without further action, as having been
supplied or affixed on the date of
mailing by an employee of the U.S.
Postal Service. Therefore, applicants
should request the postal clerk to place
a legible hand cancellation ‘‘bull’s eye’’
postmark on both the receipt and the
package. Failure to adhere to the above
instructions will be a basis for a
determination of nonresponsiveness.
E:\FR\FM\03MYN1.SGM
03MYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 84 / Tuesday, May 3, 2005 / Notices
22911
distribute such products worldwide by
any means, electronically or otherwise.
Legal Rules Pertaining to Inherently
Religious Activities by Organizations
that Receive Federal Financial
Assistance. The government is
prohibited from providing direct
support to religious activity 1. See 29
CFR part 2, subpart D. Funds from these
grants may not be used to directly
support religious instruction, worship,
prayer, proselytizing or other inherently
religious practices. Neutral, secular
criteria that neither favor nor disfavor
religion must be employed in the
selection of grant and sub-grant
recipients. In addition, under the WIA
and DOL regulations implementing the
Workforce Investment Act, a recipient
may not use direct Federal assistance to
train a participant in religious activities
or employ participants to construct,
operate, or maintain any part of a
facility that is used or to be used for
religious instruction or worship. See 29
CFR 37.6(f). Under WIA, ‘‘no individual
shall be excluded from participation in,
denied the benefits of, subjected to
discrimination under, or denied
employment in the administration of or
in connection with, any such program
or activity because of race, color,
religion, sex (except as otherwise
permitted under Title IX of the
Education Amendments of 1972),
national origin, age, disability, or
political affiliation or belief’’.
Points
4. Intergovernmental Review
This funding opportunity is not
subject to Executive Order (EO) 12372,
‘‘Intergovernmental Review of Federal
Programs.’’
5. Funding Restrictions
Determinations of allowable costs will
be made in accordance with the
applicable Federal cost principles, e.g.,
Educational Institution—OMB Circular
A–21. Disallowed costs are those
charges to a grant that the grantor
agency or its representative determines
not to be allowed in accordance with
the applicable Federal Cost Principles or
other conditions contained in the grant.
Applicants will not be entitled to
reimbursement of pre-award costs.
Limitations on Cost Per-Participant.
Because the costs of training may vary
considerably depending on the skills
and competencies required in different
occupations in different industries,
flexibility will be provided on cost perparticipant. However, applications for
funding will be reviewed to determine
if the cost of the training is appropriate
and will produce the outcomes
identified. Applicants should
demonstrate that the proposed cost perparticipant is aligned with existing price
structures for similar training in the
local area, if available, or with the
community college’s existing price
structures for the type of program
offered.
Administrative Costs. An entity that
receives a CBJTG to carry out a project
or program may not use more than 5
percent of the total amount of the grant
to pay administrative costs associated
with the program or project. The Grant
Officer reserves the right to negotiate
administrative cost levels prior to
award. Administrative costs are defined
at 20 CFR 667.220. Although there will
be administrative costs associated with
the management of the partnership as it
relates to specific grant activity, the
primary use of funding should be to
support the capacity building and
training activities.
ETA Intellectual Property Rights.
Applicants should note that grantees
must agree to provide DOL/ETA a paidup, nonexclusive and irrevocable
license to reproduce, publish, or
otherwise use for federal purposes all
products developed, or for which
ownership was purchased, under an
award, including, but not limited to,
curricula, training models, technical
assistance products, and any related
materials, and to authorize them to do
so. Such uses include, but are not
limited to, the right to modify and
VerDate jul<14>2003
15:43 May 02, 2005
Jkt 205001
6. Withdrawal of Applications
Applications may be withdrawn by
written notice or telegram (including
mailgram) received at any time before
an award is made. Applications may be
withdrawn in person by the applicant or
by an authorized representative thereof,
if the representative’s identity is made
known and the representative signs a
receipt for the proposal.
V. Application Review Information
1. Evaluation Criteria
This section identifies and describes
the criteria that will be used to evaluate
proposals for a Community-Based Job
Training Grant. These criteria and point
values are:
Criterion
Points
A. Statement of Need .......................
15
1 The term ‘‘direct’’ support is used to describe
funds or other support that are provided ‘‘directly’’
by a governmental entity or an intermediate
organization with the same duties as a
governmental entity, as opposed to funds that an
organization receives ‘‘indirectly’’ as the result of
the genuine and independent private choice of a
beneficiary within the meaning of the
Establishment Clause of the U.S. Constitution.
PO 00000
Frm 00071
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Criterion
B. Linkages to Key Partners ............
C. Training and Capacity Building
Plan ...............................................
D. Outcomes, Benefits, and Impact
E. Program Management and Organization Capacity ...........................
20
25
30
Total Possible Points .................
100
10
A. Statement of Need (15 Points)
Scoring on this criterion will be based
on the extent to which the applicant
demonstrates a clear and specific need
for Federal investment in the proposed
activities. Applicants must demonstrate
this need by: (a) Identifying the industry
or industries of focus; (b) establishing
that the identified industry satisfies
ETA’s criteria for a high-growth/highdemand industry in the local economy
as described in Part I(1) of this
solicitation; (c) providing evidence of
industry demand for training in the
local economy; and (d) describing in
detail the capacity challenges the
community college faces that limit its
ability to provide sufficient quantity or
quality of training to meet the identified
industry’s demand. In addition,
applicants should provide evidence that
the capacity challenge to be addressed
by the grant was identified in the
context of the strategic partnership.
Applicants may draw from a variety of
resources for supporting data, including:
traditional labor market information,
such as projections; industry data, such
as from trade associations or direct
information from the local industry; and
information on the local economy and
other transactional data, such as job
vacancies, that are available locally.
Additional important factors for
evaluation include:
• The extent to which the targeted
industry is high-growth or high-demand
in the context of the local economy;
• Identification of local workforce or
skills shortages within the targeted
industry;
• Demonstrated existence of the
identified capacity constraint at the
community college at which the grant
activity will take place;
• Identification of the sources of the
data used in the analysis; and
• If appropriate, the nature of larger
strategic economic development or
workforce investment projects with
which the proposed project is aligned.
B. Linkages to Key Partners (20 Points)
The applicant must demonstrate that
the proposed project will be
implemented by a strategic partnership
that includes at least one entity from
each of four categories: (1) The
E:\FR\FM\03MYN1.SGM
03MYN1
22912
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 84 / Tuesday, May 3, 2005 / Notices
workforce investment system, which
may include state and local Workforce
Investment Boards, State Workforce
Agencies, and One Stop Career Centers
and their partners, as such terms are
defined under WIA; (2) community
colleges; (3) employers and industryrelated organizations such as
associations and unions; and (4) the
continuum of education, including the
K–12 public education system. The
applicant must identify the partners,
explain the meaningful role each
partner will play in the project, and
document the resources leveraged from
each partner. Collaborating partners
must verify their role through a letter of
commitment attached to the proposal.
Applicants should also identify
resources leveraged from other
organizations, including other
workforce investment system partners.
ETA encourages, and will be looking
for, applications that go beyond the
minimum level of partnership and
demonstrate broader, substantive and
sustainable partnerships. If appropriate,
applicants should also demonstrate the
existence of a sustainability plan for the
strategic partnership beyond the
funding period.
Scoring on this criterion will be based
on: (1) Evidence that the partnership
contains each of the required entities;
(2) the degree to which each partner
plays a committed role, either financial
or non-financial, in the proposed
project; and (3) the robustness of the
applicant’s plan for sustaining the
partnership beyond the funding period.
Applications that do not have each of
the four required entities represented in
the partnership cannot receive full
points in this section. The following
elements will also be considered:
• The overall completeness of the
strategic partnership, including its
ability to manage all aspects and stages
of the project and to coordinate
individual activities with the
partnership as a whole;
• The scope of each partner’s
contribution, their knowledge and
experience concerning the proposed
grant activities, and their ability to
impact the success of the project;
• Evidence, including letters of
support, that key partners have
expressed a clear commitment to the
project and understand their areas of
responsibility;
• Evidence of a plan for interaction
between partners at each stage of the
project, from planning to execution; and
• Evidence that the partnership has
the capacity to achieve the outcomes of
the proposed project.
VerDate jul<14>2003
15:43 May 02, 2005
Jkt 205001
C. Training and Capacity Building Plan
(25 Points)
D. Outcomes, Benefits, and Impact (30
Points)
The applicant must describe its
proposed capacity building and training
strategies in full. The description should
demonstrate: (1) That the proposed
project will address identified industry
workforce or skills shortages and
identified capacity constraints at the
community college level; (2) that the
proposed project clearly integrates
industry-driven capacity building and
training activities; (3) that proposed
capacity building solutions are broad
based and include an appropriate range
of activities; (4) that proposed training
activities occur within the context of a
continuum of education and training
that supports long-term career growth,
such as an articulated career ladder/
lattice; (5) that proposed training
activities lead to appropriate
credentialing; and (6) that the applicant
has a clear understanding of the tasks
required to successfully meet the
objectives of the grant.
Scoring on this criterion will be based
on evidence that the applicant has
developed effective, innovative training
and capacity building strategies and a
plan of implementation that will satisfy
the six conditions described above.
Additional factors that will be
considered include:
• The existence of a work plan that is
responsive to the applicant’s statement
of need and includes specific goals,
objectives, activities, implementation
strategies, and a timeline;
• The demonstrated link between the
proposed project and the identified
industry workforce or skills shortages
and identified capacity constraints at
the community college level.
• The extent to which the work plan
provides an understanding of the entire
project’s intended implementation;
• The feasibility and sensibility of the
timeframes for the accomplishment of
tasks;
• The extent to which the budget is
justified with respect to the adequacy
and reasonableness of resources
requested;
• The extent to which budget line
items are consistent with and tied to the
work plan objectives;
• Evidence that the proposed cost
per-participant is aligned with existing
price structures for similar training; and
• Evidence of a robust outreach
strategy that includes the dissemination
of information regarding the project to
others who would benefit most, and if
appropriate, recruitment of eligible
participants.
Applicants must describe fully the
predicted outcomes and products
resulting from the project. Applicants
should particularly highlight the
benefits and impact of the outcomes and
products on the larger capacity
constraint described in the statement of
need. Scoring on this criterion will be
based on two broad elements:
1. The expected project outcomes are
clearly identified, measurable, realistic,
and consistent with the objectives of the
project. Key elements for training and
capacity building aspects of the
proposal are below.
a. Training: Applicants must track
training outcome measures, including
all appropriate adult or youth Common
Measures, such as employment
placement numbers and/or earnings
gains and retention. Other outcome
measures that should be tracked include
the number of individuals awarded
credentials or degrees, and outcome
measures specific to the proposed
training project. Applications must also
identify the credential that participants
will earn as a result of the proposed
training, and the employer-, industry-,
vendor-, or state-defined standards
associated with the credential. If the
credential targeted by the training
project is a certificate or performancebased certification, applicants should
either (a) demonstrate employer
engagement in the curriculum
development process, or (b) indicate
that the certification will translate into
concrete job advancement opportunities
with an employer.
b. Capacity Building: Applicants must
clearly describe all products, models,
curricula, etc. that will be developed or
acquired with federal funds through the
grant and indicate the number of
participants or entities who will benefit
from the proposed activities. Applicants
must describe the data measures that
will be used to measure how the
proposed capacity building activities
impact the ability of the community
college to train workers for skills in
demand by the targeted industry.
Applicants should indicate the longterm impact of the proposed project on
the ability of the community college to
meet local workforce demands.
2. The proposed outcomes will
translate into the successful alleviation
of the community college’s identified
capacity challenges.
Additional factors that will be
considered in the scoring of this
criterion include:
PO 00000
Frm 00072
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\03MYN1.SGM
03MYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 84 / Tuesday, May 3, 2005 / Notices
• The ability of the applicant to
achieve the stated outcomes within the
time frame of the grant; and
• The appropriateness of the
outcomes with respect to the requested
level of funding.
E. Program Management and
Organization Capacity (10 Points)
To satisfy this criterion, applicants
must describe their proposed project
management structure including, where
appropriate, the identification of a
proposed project manager, and discuss
the proposed staffing pattern and the
qualifications and experience of key
staff members. Applicants should also
give evidence of the use of data systems
to track outcomes in a timely and
accurate manner. The applicant should
include a description of organizational
capacity and the organization’s track
record in projects similar to that
described in the proposal and/or related
activities of the primary partners.
Scoring under this criterion will be
based on the extent to which applicants
provide evidence of the following:
• The time commitment of the
proposed staff is sufficient to ensure
proper direction, management, and
timely completion of the project;
• The roles and contribution of staff,
consultants, and collaborative
organizations are clearly defined and
linked to specific objectives and tasks;
• The background, experience, and
other qualifications of the staff are
sufficient to carry out their designated
roles; and
• The applicant organization has
significant capacity to accomplish the
goals and outcomes of the project,
including the ability to collect and
manage data in a way that allows
consistent, accurate, and expedient
reporting.
2. Review and Selection Process
Applications for the CommunityBased Job Training Grants will be
accepted after the publication of this
announcement until the closing date. A
technical review panel will make a
careful evaluation of applications
against the criteria set forth in Section
V(A) of this document. These criteria
are based on the policy goals, priorities,
and emphases set forth in this SGA. Up
to 100 points may be awarded to an
application, based on the required
information described in Section V(1).
The ranked scores will serve as the
primary basis for selection of
applications for funding, in conjunction
with other factors such as urban, rural,
and geographic balance; the availability
of funds; and which proposals are most
advantageous to the Government. The
VerDate jul<14>2003
15:43 May 02, 2005
Jkt 205001
panel results are advisory in nature and
not binding on the Grant Officer, who
may consider any information that
comes to his attention. DOL may elect
to award the grant(s) with or without
discussions with the applicants. Should
a grant be awarded without discussions,
the award will be based on the
applicant’s signature on the SF 424,
which constitutes a binding offer.
VI. Award Administration Information
1. Award Notices
All award notifications will be posted
on the ETA Homepage (https://
www.doleta.gov). Non-selected
applicants will be notified by mail.
2. Administrative and National Policy
Requirements
A. Administrative Program
Requirements
All grantees will be subject to all
applicable Federal laws, regulations,
and the applicable OMB Circulars. The
grant(s) awarded under this SGA will be
subject to the following administrative
standards and provisions, if applicable:
1. Workforce Investment Boards—20
Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part
667.220. (Administrative Costs).
2. Non-Profit Organizations—OMB
Circulars A–122 (Cost Principles) and
29 CFR Part 95 (Administrative
Requirements).
3. Educational Institutions—OMB
Circulars A–21 (Cost Principles) and 29
CFR Part 95 (Administrative
Requirements).
4. State and Local Governments—
OMB Circulars A–87 (Cost Principles)
and 29 CFR Part 97 (Administrative
Requirements).
5. Profit Making Commercial Firms—
Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR)—
48 CFR Part 31 (Cost Principles), and 29
CFR Part 95 (Administrative
Requirements).
6. All entities must comply with 29
CFR Parts 93 and 98, and, where
applicable, 29 CFR Parts 96 and 99.
7. The following administrative
standards and provisions may also be
applicable:
a. 29 CFR part 2, subpart D—Equal
Treatment in Department of Labor
Programs for Religious Organizations,
Protection of Religious Liberty of
Department of Labor Social Service
Providers and Beneficiaries;
b. 29 CFR part 30—Equal
Employment Opportunity in
Apprenticeship and Training;
c. 29 CFR part 31—Nondiscrimination
in Federally Assisted Programs of the
Department of Labor—Effectuation of
Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964;
d. 29 CFR part 32—
Nondiscrimination on the Basis of
PO 00000
Frm 00073
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
22913
Handicap in Programs and Activities
Receiving or Benefiting from Federal
Financial Assistance;
e. 29 CFR part 33—Enforcement of
Nondiscrimination on the Basis of
Handicap in Programs or Activities
Conducted by the Department of Labor;
f. 29 CFR part 35—Nondiscrimination
on the Basis of Age in Programs or
Activities Receiving Federal Financial
Assistance from the Department of
Labor;
g. 29 CFR part 36—Nondiscrimination
on the Basis of Sex in Education
Programs or Activities Receiving
Federal Financial Assistance;
h. 29 CFR part 37—Implementation of
the Nondiscrimination and Equal
Opportunity Provisions of the
Workforce Investment Act of 1998
(WIA).
8. In accordance with Section 18 of
the Lobbying Disclosure Act of 1995
(Pub. L. 104–65) (2 U.S.C. 1611) nonprofit entities incorporated under
Internal Revenue Service Code section
501(c) (4) that engage in lobbying
activities are not eligible to receive
Federal funds and grants.
Note: Except as specifically provided in
this Notice, DOL/ETA’s acceptance of a
proposal and an award of Federal funds to
sponsor any program(s) does not provide a
waiver of any grant requirements and/or
procedures. For example, OMB Circulars
require that an entity’s procurement
procedures must ensure that all procurement
transactions are conducted, as much as
practical, to provide open and free
competition. If a proposal identifies a
specific entity to provide services, the DOL/
ETA’s award does not provide the
justification or basis to sole source the
procurement, i.e., avoid competition, unless
the activity is regarded as the primary work
of an official partner to the application.
B. Special Program Requirements
Evaluation. DOL may require that the
program or project participate in an
evaluation of overall performance of
CBJTGs. To measure the impact of the
CBJTGs, ETA may arrange for or
conduct an independent evaluation of
the outcomes and benefits of the
projects. Grantees must agree to make
records on participants, employers and
funding available, and to provide access
to program operating personnel and
participants, as specified by the
evaluator(s) under the direction of ETA,
including after the expiration date of the
grant.
C. Reporting
The grantee is required to provide the
reports and documents listed below:
Quarterly Financial Reports. A
Quarterly Financial Status Report (SF
269) is required until such time as all
E:\FR\FM\03MYN1.SGM
03MYN1
22914
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 84 / Tuesday, May 3, 2005 / Notices
funds have been expended or the grant
period has expired. Quarterly reports
are due 30 days after the end of each
calendar year quarter. Grantees must use
ETA’s On-Line Electronic Reporting
System.
Quarterly Progress Reports. The
grantee must submit a quarterly progress
report to the designated Federal Project
Officer within 30 days after the end of
each calendar year quarter. Two copies
are to be submitted providing a detailed
account of activities undertaken during
that quarter. DOL may require
additional data elements to be collected
and reported on either a regular basis or
special request basis. Grantees must
agree to meet DOL reporting
requirements. The quarterly progress
report should be in narrative form and
should include:
1. General grant information,
including: a general overview of project
progress, new developments and
resolution of previous issues and
challenges; a discussion of planned
grant activities and any other grantrelated events; an explanation of any
issues/challenges encountered and the
proposed strategies to overcome them; a
description of major accomplishments,
innovations, or promising approaches
and processes; product deliverables and
outcomes resulting from the project; and
a status update on leveraged resources;
2. Information on all training,
employer, and grant deliverable
outcomes as well as the anticipated
impact of these outcomes on the
community college, industry partners,
and the broader community;
3. Summary of the status of grant
deliverables and dissemination
activities;
4. Highlights of promising approaches
and success stories; and
5. Description of technical assistance
needs.
Final Report. A draft final report must
be submitted no later than 60 days prior
to the expiration date of the grant. This
report must summarize project
activities, employment outcomes, and
related results of the training project,
and should thoroughly document
capacity building and training
approaches. After responding to DOL
questions and comments on the draft
report, three copies of the final report
must be submitted no later than the
grant expiration date. Grantees must
agree to use a designated format
specified by DOL for preparing the final
report.
VII. Agency Contacts
Any questions regarding this SGA
should be faxed to Kevin Brumback,
Grants Management Specialist, Division
VerDate jul<14>2003
15:43 May 02, 2005
Jkt 205001
of Federal Assistance, FAX number
(202) 693–2705. (This is not a toll-free
number). You must specifically address
your FAX to the attention of Kevin
Brumback and should include SGA/
DFA–PY–04–10, a contact name, fax
and phone number.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Please contact Kevin Brumback, Grants
Management Specialist, Division of
Federal Assistance, at (202) 693–3381.
(This is not a toll-free number). This
announcement is also being made
available on the ETA Web site at
https://www.doleta.gov/sga/sga.cfm and
https://www.grants.gov.
VIII. Other Information
Resources for the Applicant
DOL maintains a number of webbased resources that may be of
assistance to applicants.
• The Web page for the Employment
and Training Administration’s Business
Relations Group (https://www.doleta.gov/
BRG) is a valuable source for
background information on the
President’s High Growth Job Training
Initiative, the predecessor to the
Community-Based Job Training Grants.
• For additional information on the
workforce investment system, please see
the ‘‘Community Based Organization
Information Booklet’’ at (https://
www.dol.gov/cfbci/
cbobook.htm#investmentact).
• America’s Service Locator (https://
www.servicelocator.org) provides a
directory of our nation’s One-Stop
Career Centers.
• Applicants are encouraged to
review ‘‘Help with Solicitation for Grant
Applications’’ (https://www.dol.gov/
cfbci/sgabrochure.htm).
• For a basic understanding of the
grants process and basic responsibilities
of receiving Federal grant support,
please see ‘‘Guidance for Faith-Based
and Community Organizations on
Partnering with the Federal
Government’’ (https://
www.whitehouse.gov/government/fbci/
guidance/).
Signed at Washington, DC, this 28th day of
April, 2005.
Eric D. Luetkenhaus,
Employment and Training Administration,
Grant Officer.
Appendix A: Examples of Demand-Driven
Community College Capacity Building
and Training Programs
Appendix B: SF 424—Application Form
Appendix C: SF 424A—Budget Information
Form
Appendix D: OMB Survey N. 1890–0014:
Survey on Ensuring Equal Opportunity
for Applicants
PO 00000
Frm 00074
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Appendix A: Examples of Demand-Driven
Community College Capacity Building and
Training Programs
Example 1: Rural Community Needs Health
Care Workers
Need: A rural community in the Midwest
is experiencing a critical shortage of health
care workers despite a high unemployment
rate in the region due to the closing of several
manufacturing plants, as well as a significant
number of returning veterans. The local
community college has several training
programs to prepare health care workers,
however, the equipment used by the college
is out of date and local health care providers
do not believe that the college’s graduates are
adequately prepared for the workplace.
Partnership: Executives from the
community’s major health care providers
have approached the college with ideas for
improving the health care curriculum, in
particular the laboratory and clinical
experiences required for graduation. The
college president convened an Advisory
Panel to evaluate the current curriculum and
the industry’s proposal, and to develop a
recommend course of action for improving
the college’s health care training programs.
The Advisory Panel includes: Physicians;
nurses, health care administrators; the chairs
of the local workforce investment board and
economic development agency; the One-Stop
operator; the dedicated veterans
representative; representatives from the local
school district; adult education providers,
and the state university system; and
representatives for senior citizens, dislocated
workers, and youth.
Proposed Project: The Advisory Panel
developed recommendations for improving
the college’s capacity to train new health care
workers, as well as the type of training and
clinical experiences provided. The new
curriculum aligns with national standards for
accreditation, and graduates will be prepared
to take certification exams offered by national
health care professional organizations. In
addition, the Advisory Panel recommended
that the college take immediate steps to
revamp the existing laboratory space used by
the health care training programs. A local
hospital has agreed to donate half the
equipment needed to modernize the labs,
dependent on the college’s ability to leverage
resources for the remaining equipment needs.
The Advisory Panel noted that many of the
region’s workers who were dislocated due to
plant closings lack a high school diploma, a
prerequisite of the health care training
programs. The Advisory Panel recommended
that the college work with local adult basic
education providers to link GED preparation
courses with the introductory coursework
required in the first semester of the health
care training programs, allowing students to
earn their GED while developing new
occupational skills. The Advisory Panel also
recommended convening a working group to
crosswalk the skill sets of returning veterans
with the new curriculum and local health
care provider needs and to develop and
outreach strategy to the veterans community.
The college anticipates graduating fifty
additional health care workers each year as
a result of the proposed curriculum changes,
E:\FR\FM\03MYN1.SGM
03MYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 84 / Tuesday, May 3, 2005 / Notices
connections with adult basic education and
veterans community, and laboratory
upgrades.
Example 2: Native American Community
Needs IT Workers
Need: A tribal college has recently
implemented vendor-based IT certification
programs in response to the demand by local
business leaders for credential system
administrators and other IT professionals.
While the college has up-to-date equipment
and numerous student applications, it has
been unable to attract qualified faculty to
fully staff the programs.
Partnership: Several years ago, local
business and education leaders identified IT
skills as an essential need in the community.
They formed a group to spearhead several
technology initiatives, including expanding
the technology curriculum at the local high
school and opening a new computer
laboratory for vendor-based certification
programs at the tribal college. The group
included: Tribal, business, and education
leaders; parents; and representatives from the
local economic development and workforce
investment systems. The tribal college has
recently approached the group for help in
solving the staffing problem.
Proposed Project: The group explored
several options and developed a proposal for
attracting qualified faculty, including a
competitive wage scale and expanded
benefits. The plan also includes incentives
for helping qualified tribal members attain
the professional credentials and experiences
needed to join the faculty. The college
VerDate jul<14>2003
15:43 May 02, 2005
Jkt 205001
anticipates that these plans will succeed in
filling four faculty positions, which will
allow the programs to graduate an additional
one hundred certified IT professionals per
year.
Example 3: Connections to Youth Programs
Need: The local IT industry has identified
a problem with garnering interest among
young people to pursue careers in network
and systems administration. Through
collaborations with the local One-Stop Career
Center, several employers have recently
learned about the region’s Job Corps center
which trains at-risk youth for careers,
including IT careers. The employers
interviewed several Job Corps graduates and
determined that while the Job Corps students
have good basic computer skills, they are not
quite ready for the network and systems
administration positions that employers are
trying to fill.
Partnerships: At the next WIA Youth
Council meeting, the employers bring their
concerns to the table and ask the council to
help them develop solutions to the problem.
The head of the local community college sits
on the Youth Council and suggests that the
college’s IT vendor certification programs
may be an appropriate next training step for
the Job Corps graduates and for other youth
enrolled in the local WIA Youth program.
The employers are familiar with the
competencies developed through the vendor
certification programs and agree that these
are the skills they are seeking.
Proposed Project: In subsequent Youth
Council meetings, representatives for the
PO 00000
Frm 00075
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
22915
employers, Job Corps, WIA Youth programs,
and the community college work to develop
a plan for:
1. Identifying youth who might be
successful network or systems administration
candidates;
2. Referring youth to the community
college’s vendor certification programs;
3. Training youth in the skills and
competencies the employers require; and
4. Connecting program graduates with
existing openings in the field through the
local One-Stop Career Center.
The program is successfully implemented
after several months of planning, and the
employers are pleased with the advanced
skills of the youth that are referred by the
local One-Stop Career Center. Unfortunately,
there is now more demand for the
community college’s IT training programs
than there are slots for student enrollment
due to computer laboratory and faculty
constraints. Working with representatives of
the local IT industry, the partners have
identified several highly experienced and
qualified executives who are interested in
teaching IT courses at the community college
part-time. This solution will address part of
the capacity constraint issue; however, the
college still needs to resolve the problem of
computer lab space. The local Workforce
Investment Board Chair suggests that the
partners prepare a proposal for a CommunityBased Job Training Grant to help support the
needed computer laboratory expansion.
BILLING CODE 4510–30–P
E:\FR\FM\03MYN1.SGM
03MYN1
VerDate jul<14>2003
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 84 / Tuesday, May 3, 2005 / Notices
15:43 May 02, 2005
Jkt 205001
PO 00000
Frm 00076
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\03MYN1.SGM
03MYN1
EN03MY05.000
22916
VerDate jul<14>2003
15:43 May 02, 2005
Jkt 205001
PO 00000
Frm 00077
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\03MYN1.SGM
03MYN1
22917
EN03MY05.001
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 84 / Tuesday, May 3, 2005 / Notices
VerDate jul<14>2003
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 84 / Tuesday, May 3, 2005 / Notices
15:43 May 02, 2005
Jkt 205001
PO 00000
Frm 00078
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\03MYN1.SGM
03MYN1
EN03MY05.002
22918
VerDate jul<14>2003
15:43 May 02, 2005
Jkt 205001
PO 00000
Frm 00079
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\03MYN1.SGM
03MYN1
22919
EN03MY05.003
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 84 / Tuesday, May 3, 2005 / Notices
VerDate jul<14>2003
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 84 / Tuesday, May 3, 2005 / Notices
15:43 May 02, 2005
Jkt 205001
PO 00000
Frm 00080
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\03MYN1.SGM
03MYN1
EN03MY05.004
22920
VerDate jul<14>2003
15:43 May 02, 2005
Jkt 205001
PO 00000
Frm 00081
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\03MYN1.SGM
03MYN1
22921
EN03MY05.005
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 84 / Tuesday, May 3, 2005 / Notices
VerDate jul<14>2003
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 84 / Tuesday, May 3, 2005 / Notices
15:43 May 02, 2005
Jkt 205001
PO 00000
Frm 00082
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\03MYN1.SGM
03MYN1
EN03MY05.006
22922
VerDate jul<14>2003
15:43 May 02, 2005
Jkt 205001
PO 00000
Frm 00083
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\03MYN1.SGM
03MYN1
22923
EN03MY05.007
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 84 / Tuesday, May 3, 2005 / Notices
22924
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 84 / Tuesday, May 3, 2005 / Notices
and transported to the meeting location,
if seating is available. Please provide the
requested information, by the
appropriate date, via FAX to (301) 286–
1715, to the attention of Kathy Palmer,
noting at the top: ‘‘PUBLIC ADMISSION
TO THE FINANCIAL AUDIT
COMMITTEE MEETING @ GSFC.’’
Faxes not addressed as required will not
be processed. For security questions,
please contact Kathy Palmer at (301)
286–0569.
[FR Doc. 05–8772 Filed 5–2–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–30–C
NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND
SPACE ADMINISTRATION
[Notice 05–083]
NASA Advisory Council, Financial
Audit Committee, Meeting
National Aeronautics and
Space Administration.
ACTION: Notice of meeting.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: In accordance with the
Federal Advisory Committee Act
(FACA), Pub. L. 92–463, as amended,
the National Aeronautics and Space
Administration announce a forthcoming
meeting of the NASA Advisory Council
(NAC), Financial Audit Committee
(NFAC).
DATES:
Friday, May 20, 2005, 9 a.m. to
3 p.m.
National Aeronautics and
Space Administration, Goddard Space
Flight Center, 8463 Greenbelt Road,
Bldg. 8, Room 429, Greenbelt, MD
20770. (301) 286–0569.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.
Ermerdene Lee, of the Chief Financial
Officer’s Office, National Aeronautics
and Space Administration, Washington,
DC 20546. (202) 358–4529, e-mail
elee1@hq.nasa.gov.
ADDRESSES:
The
meeting will be open to the public up
to the capacity of the room. The agenda
for the meeting includes the following
topics:
• Overview of the Goddard Space
Flight Center
• Goddard Office of the Chief
Financial Officer Summary
• Financial Management Material
Weakness
• Corrective Action Tracking System
U.S. Citizens desiring to attend the
NASA Financial Audit Committee
meeting at the Goddard Space Flight
Center (GSFC) must provide their full
name, citizenship, company affiliation
(if applicable), place of birth, and date
of birth and Foreign nationals who
desire to attend the meeting must
provide their passport or naturalization
papers to the GSFC Security Office no
less than 3 working days prior to the
meeting. If the above information is not
received by the noted date, attendees
should expect a delay in entering the
Goddard Space Flight Center. All
visitors to this meeting should go to the
GSFC Security Office, accessible from
Greenbelt Road, where they will be
cleared, given an identification badge,
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
VerDate jul<14>2003
15:43 May 02, 2005
Jkt 205001
Dated: April 27, 2005.
P. Diane Rausch,
Advisory Committee Management Officer,
National Aeronautics and Space
Administration.
[FR Doc. 05–8809 Filed 5–2–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7510–13–P
NATIONAL ARCHIVES AND RECORDS
ADMINISTRATION
Records Schedules; Availability and
Request for Comments
National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA).
ACTION: Notice of availability of
proposed records schedules; request for
comments.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The National Archives and
Records Administration (NARA)
publishes notice at least once monthly
of certain Federal agency requests for
records disposition authority (records
schedules). Once approved by NARA,
records schedules provide mandatory
instructions on what happens to records
when no longer needed for current
Government business. They authorize
the preservation of records of
continuing value in the National
Archives of the United States and the
destruction, after a specified period, of
records lacking administrative, legal,
research, or other value. Notice is
published for records schedules in
which agencies propose to destroy
records not previously authorized for
disposal or reduce the retention period
of records already authorized for
disposal. NARA invites public
comments on such records schedules, as
required by 44 U.S.C. 3303a(a).
DATES: Requests for copies must be
received in writing on or before June 17,
2005. Once the appraisal of the records
is completed, NARA will send a copy of
the schedule. NARA staff usually
prepare appraisal memorandums that
contain additional information
concerning the records covered by a
proposed schedule. These, too, may be
requested and will be provided once the
appraisal is completed. Requesters will
be given 30 days to submit comments.
PO 00000
Frm 00084
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
You may request a copy of
any records schedule identified in this
notice by contacting the Life Cycle
Management Division (NWML) using
one of the following means:
Mail: NARA (NWML), 8601 Adelphi
Road, College Park, MD 20740–6001.
E-mail: records.mgt@nara.gov.
FAX: 301–837–3698.
Requesters must cite the control
number, which appears in parentheses
after the name of the agency which
submitted the schedule, and must
provide a mailing address. Those who
desire appraisal reports should so
indicate in their request.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Paul
M. Wester, Jr., Director, Life Cycle
Management Division (NWML),
National Archives and Records
Administration, 8601 Adelphi Road,
College Park, MD 20740–6001.
Telephone: 301–837–3120. E-mail:
records.mgt@nara.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Each year
Federal agencies create billions of
records on paper, film, magnetic tape,
and other media. To control this
accumulation, agency records managers
prepare schedules proposing retention
periods for records and submit these
schedules for NARA’s approval, using
the Standard Form (SF) 115, Request for
Records Disposition Authority. These
schedules provide for the timely transfer
into the National Archives of
historically valuable records and
authorize the disposal of all other
records after the agency no longer needs
them to conduct its business. Some
schedules are comprehensive and cover
all the records of an agency or one of its
major subdivisions. Most schedules,
however, cover records of only one
office or program or a few series of
records. Many of these update
previously approved schedules, and
some include records proposed as
permanent.
No Federal records are authorized for
destruction without the approval of the
Archivist of the United States. This
approval is granted only after a
thorough consideration of their
administrative use by the agency of
origin, the rights of the Government and
of private persons directly affected by
the Government’s activities, and
whether or not they have historical or
other value.
Besides identifying the Federal
agencies and any subdivisions
requesting disposition authority, this
public notice lists the organizational
unit(s) accumulating the records or
indicates agency-wide applicability in
the case of schedules that cover records
that may be accumulated throughout an
ADDRESSES:
E:\FR\FM\03MYN1.SGM
03MYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 84 (Tuesday, May 3, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 22905-22924]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-8772]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training Administration
Notice of Availability of Funds and Solicitation for Grant
Applications (SGA) for Community-Based Job Training Grants
Announcement type: New. Notice of Solicitation for Grant
Applications.
Funding Opportunity Number: SGA/DFA-PY-04-10.
Catalog of Federal Assistance Number: 17.261.
Key Dates: The closing date for receipt of applications under this
announcement is July 6, 2005. Applications must be received at the
address below no later than 5 p.m. (eastern time). Application and
submission information is explained in detail in Section IV of this
SGA. Virtual Prospective Applicant Conferences will be held for this
grant competition. The dates and access information for these
prospective applicant conferences will be posted on ETA's Web site at
https://www.doleta.gov/business/Community-BasedJobTrainingGrants.cfm.
SUMMARY: The Employment and Training Administration (ETA), U.S.
Department of Labor (DOL), announces the availability of approximately
$125 million in grant funds for Community-Based Job Training Grants.
Community-Based Job Training Grants will be awarded through a
competitive process to support workforce training for high-growth
industries through the national system of community and technical
colleges. The primary purpose of these grants is to build the capacity
of community colleges to train workers to develop the skills required
to succeed in (i) local industries and occupations that are expected to
experience high growth and (ii) industries where demand for qualified
workers is outstripping the supply. Funds will be awarded to community
colleges to engage in a combination of capacity building and training
activities targeted at high-growth or high-demand industries in the
local economy.
In awarding Community-Based Job Training Grants, every effort will
be made to fairly distribute grants across rural and urban areas and
across the
[[Page 22906]]
different geographic regions of the United States. It is anticipated
that individual awards will range in amount from $500,000 to $2
million. A second solicitation is anticipated for Fall/Winter 2005.
This solicitation provides background information and describes the
application submission requirements, outlines the process that eligible
entities must use to apply for funds covered by this solicitation, and
details how grantees will be selected.
ADDRESSES: Mailed applications must be addressed to the U.S. Department
of Labor, Employment and Training Administration, Division of Federal
Assistance, Attention: Eric Luetkenhaus, Grant Officer, Reference SGA/
DFA-PY-04-10, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW., Room N-4438, Washington, DC
20210. Telefacsimile (FAX) applications will not be accepted.
Information about applying online can be found in Section IV (C) of
this document. Applicants are advised that mail delivery in the
Washington area may be delayed due to mail decontamination procedures.
Hand delivered proposals will be received at the above address.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
This solicitation consists of eight parts:
Part I provides background information.
Part II describes the size and nature of the anticipated
awards.
Part III describes eligible applicants and other grant
specifications.
Part IV provides information on the application and
submission process.
Part V describes the criteria against which applications
will be reviewed and explains the proposal review process.
Part VI provides award administration information.
Part VII contains DOL agency contact information.
Part VIII lists additional resources of interest to
applicants.
I. Funding Opportunity Description
The Community-Based Job Training Grants (CBJTGs) are designed to
support workforce training for high-growth industries through the
national system of community and technical colleges. The primary
purpose of these grants is to build the capacity of community colleges
to train workers to develop the skills required to succeed in (i) local
industries and occupations that are expected to experience high growth
and (ii) industries where demand for qualified workers is outstripping
the supply. Part 1 of this section provides an overview of ETA's
demand-driven workforce investment strategies. Part 2 provides
background information on the principles underlying the CBJTGs. Part 3
describes critical elements of the grants themselves.
1. The Employment and Training Administration's Demand-Driven Workforce
Investment Strategies
Each year, the federal government invests over $15 billion in a
state and local network of resources, known as the workforce investment
system, to assist businesses in recruiting, training, and retaining a
skilled workforce. While these investments have in the past supported a
set of standard menu-driven services for employers and workers, the
realities of today's rapidly changing global economy make it imperative
that the workforce investment system support customized activities that
are driven by local employer demand. This demand-driven approach to
workforce development is necessary to prepare workers to take advantage
of new and increasing job opportunities in high-growth/high-demand and
economically vital industries and sectors of the American economy.
In a demand-driven workforce investment system, state and local
Workforce Investment Boards invest strategically in workforce
development activities that are relevant to the requirements of local
industry and have a long-term impact on the ability of the community to
meet local workforce demands. To do so, they bring to the table
critical collaborative partners in the development of America's
workforce: employers and education and training providers.
Within the context of these strategic partnerships, communities use
a solutions-based approach to workforce development planning, in which
the partnering entities work through the cycle of: (1) Collecting and
analyzing information about local workforce needs and critical capacity
constraints; (2) incorporating a business or demand-driven perspective
into issue identification and solutions development; (3) ensuring that
the right strategic partners are at the table; (4) working
collaboratively to explore, frame, and implement solutions; and (5)
assessing how the products and outcomes of the project can be
effectively deployed and replicated. The goal of this process is to
ensure that the proposed project will ultimately succeed in resolving
the industry-identified workforce challenge.
The solutions-based approach engages each collaborative partner in
its area of strength. Industry representatives and employers define
workforce challenges facing the industry and identify the competencies
and skills required for the industry's workforce. The workforce
investment system provides access to human capital (youth, unemployed,
underemployed, incumbent workers, and dislocated workers), assists with
training programs, and places trained workers in jobs. Community
colleges and other training providers assist in developing competency
models and training curricula and train new and incumbent workers. The
K-12 public education system ensures that investments at the community
college are part of a continuum of education and training leading to
successful skill development.
ETA first modeled the power of these strategic partnerships through
the President's High Growth Job Training Initiative (High Growth
Initiative). The High Growth Initiative is a strategic effort to
prepare workers for new and increasing job opportunities in high-
growth/high-demand and economically vital industries and sectors of the
American economy. Through the initiative, ETA identifies high-growth/
high-demand industries, evaluates their skills needs, and funds local
and national partnership-based demonstration projects that provide
workforce solutions to ensure that individuals can gain the skills to
get good jobs in these rapidly expanding or transforming industries.
The products, models and effective approaches that result from the High
Growth Initiative will be broadly disseminated to employers, education
and training providers, and the workforce investment system to build
their capacity to respond to employer demands.
2. Background on the Community-Based Job Training Grants
The Community-Based Job Training Grants (CBJTGs) continue the work
of the High Growth Initiative by incorporating its focus on high-
growth, high-demand industries and its emphasis on the role of
strategic partnerships in workforce development. The CBJTGs build on
the work of the High Growth Initiative by highlighting the critical
role community colleges play as partners in the demand-driven workforce
investment system, and by supporting community efforts to link training
initiatives to the skill demands of local employers. As a result, CBJTG
activities will lead to an increased number of high-growth firms being
supported by the local workforce and education systems, and more
individuals being trained and employed in high-growth sectors.
[[Page 22907]]
Community colleges represent a critical 21st century training
resource for workers needing to attain, retool, refine, and broaden
their skills to meet industry demand. According to the Bureau of Labor
Statistics, eighty percent of the fastest growing jobs in the United
States require some level of post-secondary education. The
accessibility and affordability of community college training, combined
with the adaptability of community college curricula to changing skill
needs, make community colleges a vital training resource for many U.S.
workers. Furthermore, community colleges are closely connected to local
labor markets, making them well-positioned to prepare workers for good
jobs with good wages in the local economy.
However, community college leaders and industry executives report
that many community colleges are unable to meet local demand for
training because of critical capacity constraints. These capacity
constraints occur when community colleges lack sufficient resources to
support training facilities and equipment, curriculum development,
faculty appointments, clinical experiences, and/or other elements that
are necessary to provide either the volume or quality of training that
industry requires. Despite rising application rates, the reality of
current state and local budgets often prevents colleges from funding
the programs, faculty, and student services they need to be responsive
to local workforce demands.
The CBJTGs will address this critical capacity issue. Funds will be
awarded to community colleges to engage in a combination of capacity
building and training activities targeted at high-growth or high-demand
industries in the local economy.
3. Critical Elements of Community-Based Job Training Grants
It is ETA's expectation that CBJTGs will contain at least six
critical elements. These elements consist of: (A) Focus on skill and
competency needs of local high-growth/high-demand industries; (B)
strategic partnerships; (C) industry-driven capacity building and
training efforts; (D) leveraged resources; (E) replication; and (F)
clear and specific outcomes. These characteristics are reflected in the
evaluation criteria in Part V and are described in further detail
below. For examples of projects that integrate these elements, please
see Appendix A.
A. Focus on skill and competency needs of local high-growth/high-
demand industries. The Workforce Investment Act of 1998 (Pub. L. 105-
220) (WIA) emphasizes a workforce system driven by the needs of local
employers. In order for America to remain competitive in the global
economy, it is essential that ETA target its investments to support
employers in high-growth/high-demand industries. Community colleges
play a vital role in this effort by providing training to address the
workforce needs of these industries. A high-growth/high-demand industry
meets one or more of the following criteria: (1) Is projected to add
substantial numbers of new jobs to the economy; (2) has a significant
impact on the economy overall; (3) impacts the growth of other
industries; (4) is being transformed by technology and innovation
requiring new skill sets for workers; or (5) is a new and emerging
business that is projected to grow.
B. Strategic Partnerships. ETA believes that strategic partnerships
between community colleges, the workforce investment system, business
and industry, and the continuum of education, including the K-12
system, need to be in place in order to implement effective demand-
driven training and capacity building strategies. These strategic
partnerships may have a local, regional, or statewide focus, and may
include a consortium of partners or cross-industry representatives.
Specific requirements for strategic partnerships are outlined in
Section III (3). These strategic partnerships should focus broadly on
the workforce challenges of one or more high-growth, high-demand
industries and work collaboratively to identify and implement solutions
to those challenges. These solutions should include, among others,
strategies to increase the capacity of local community colleges to
educate and train more workers with industry-defined skills and
competencies. Therefore, the investment in community college capacity
building would be one of many strategies and solutions that evolve from
the partnership. While ETA welcomes applications from newly formed
strategic partnerships, applicants are advised that grant funds may not
be used for partnership development.
Within the context of the broader strategic partnership and as it
relates to this grant, each collaborative partner should have clearly
defined roles. Each partner should verify their role through a letter
of commitment attached to the proposal. The exact nature of these roles
may vary depending on the issue areas being addressed and the scope and
nature of the activities undertaken. However, ETA expects that each
collaborative partner will, at minimum, contribute in the following
ways. Employers should be actively engaged and participate fully in
every aspect of grant activities including: defining the program
strategy and goals; identifying needed skills and competencies;
designing training approaches and curricula; implementing the program;
contributing financial support; and, where appropriate, hiring
qualified training graduates. The K-12 education system is an important
foundational partner to ensure the project's activities are tied to the
broader continuum of education in the community. The workforce
investment system, which may include state and local Workforce
Investment Boards, State Workforce Agencies, and One-Stop Career
Centers and their cooperating partners, as such terms are defined under
WIA, may play a number of roles, including: identifying and assessing
candidates for training; working collaboratively to leverage WIA
investments; referring qualified candidates to the community college
for enrollment; providing wrap-around support services, where
appropriate; and referring qualified training graduates to employers
with existing job openings.
In order to maximize the success of the project and to keep pace
with the rapid changes in the economy and the nature of the skills and
competencies necessary for work in these industries, these strategic
partnerships need to be substantial and sustained. ETA encourages
partners to plan for sustainability of the partnership to enable
ongoing assessment of industry workforce needs and collaborative
development of solutions on an ongoing basis.
C. Industry-driven capacity building and training efforts. All
CBJTGs must develop and implement a combination of capacity building
and training activities that target skills and competencies demanded by
local high-growth/high-demand industries. Applicants are not limited in
the strategies and approaches they may employ to implement their
capacity building and training strategies, provided the activities meet
the following requirements:
(1) Training. Training activities must: (a) Occur within the
context of a continuum of education and training that supports long-
term career growth, such as an articulated career ladder/lattice and
(b) result in college credit or other credentials that are industry-
recognized and indicate a level of mastery and competence in a given
field or function. The credential awarded to participants upon
completion should be based on the type of training provided through the
grant and the requirements
[[Page 22908]]
of the targeted occupation, and should be selected based on
consultations with industry partners. For example:
a. Customized and short-term training should result in a
performance-based certification or certificate. This certification may
be developed jointly by employers and the community college, based on
defined knowledge and skill requirements for specific high-demand
occupations/functions. Performance-based certifications may also be
based on industry-recognized curriculum and standards.
b. Training in information technology, allied health professions,
and other fields with established professional standards and
examinations should result in certification.
c. In states where licensure is required for the specific
occupation targeted by the training, the credentialing requirement
should be set accordingly.
d. In some instances, training provided under CBJTGs may lead to a
degree. In these instances, the credential required will be credit for
each course leading to an Associate's or Applied Associate's degree.
(2) Capacity Building. Community colleges are encouraged to broadly
assess their capacity to meet the training needs of the targeted high-
growth/high-demand industry or industries. Proposed capacity building
strategies are expected to address significant barriers which impede
the ability of the community college to meet local industry demand for
workforce training. These strategies should not simply address isolated
deficits, but rather provide a comprehensive solution to identified
capacity challenges as they relate to the industry or industries of
focus. Examples of capacity building activities include, but are not
limited to:
a. The development or adaptation of competency models and curricula
to support training;
b. The development of innovative curricula, teaching methods and
instructional design to maximize the impact of the initiative in
meeting the skills needs of employers;
c. Innovative strategies to ensure availability of qualified and
certified instructors;
d. Procurement of equipment and simulation equipment necessary to
train to industry-demanded skills; or
e. Support for clinical experiences required for certification or
licensure.
Capacity building activities must meet two criteria: (1) The
proposed capacity building efforts must be directly linked to the
specific training supported under the grant; and (2) grantees must use
their grant funds in a manner consistent with the regulations and
policies governing use of funds under 171(d) of WIA, which broadly
allows the funds to be utilized to test an array of approaches to the
provision of training services and support the development and
replication of effective training strategies.
D. Leveraged Resources. Projects funded through CBJTGs should
leverage resources from key entities in the strategic partnership.
Leveraging resources in the context of strategic partnerships
accomplishes three goals: (1) It allows for the strategic pursuit of
resources; (2) it increases stakeholder investment in the project at
all levels including design and implementation phases; and (3) it
broadens the impact of the project itself. Applicants are encouraged to
leverage significant resources from key partners and other
organizations to maximize the impact of the project on the community.
ETA strongly encourages CBJTG applicants and their strategic
partners to be entrepreneurial as they seek out, utilize, and sustain
these resources, whether they are in-kind or cash contributions, when
creating capacity building and training strategies. Businesses, faith-
based and community organizations, and foundations often invest
resources to support workforce development. Faith-based and community
organizations may provide resources such as support services,
mentoring, tutoring, and volunteers, all of which are important
resources for grantees to leverage in assisting the populations
targeted by these funds. In addition, other government programs,
including the Department of Education, the Department of Commerce, and
other ETA programs, such as registered apprenticeship and Job Corps,
may have resources available that can be integrated into the proposed
project.
ETA also encourages applicants to integrate WIA funding at the
state and local level into their proposed project. Integrating WIA
funds ensures that the full spectrum of assets available from the
workforce system is leveraged to support the capacity building and
training activities. The wide variety of WIA programs and activities
provide both breadth and depth to the proposed solution offered to both
business and individuals. The use of WIA funds also serves to embed the
solutions-based approach into the local or regional workforce
investment system, which strengthens the system's ability to become
more demand-driven.
E. Replication. CBJTGs are intended to drive the community college
system and the workforce investment system to be more responsive to the
workforce demands of industry by making the products, models, and
effective approaches that result from CBJTG investments available to
both systems. To that end, grantees will develop the foundations and
outcomes of CBJTG projects, including the learning and achievement
resulting from the projects, into solutions-based models that can be
shared with, and implemented by, other community colleges, the
workforce system, and industry leaders.
F. Outcomes. The CBJTGs will be fundamentally results-oriented.
Therefore, clear and specific outcomes that are appropriate to the
nature of the proposed activities and the size of the project are vital
components of CBJTG projects. Because CBJTGs invest in customized
strategies to address local workforce and skills shortages, ETA
recognizes that specific outcomes will vary from project to project
based on the specific activities proposed. Training outcomes should
include those tracked by the Common Measures, the OMB-approved uniform
evaluation metrics for job training and employment programs. A detailed
description of ETA's policy on the Common Measures can be found in the
Training and Employment Guidance Letter (TEGL) No. 28-04 (https://
wdr.doleta.gov/directives/attach/TEGL28-04.pdf). A basic list of Common
Measures is provided as attachment B to the TEGL (https://
wdr.doleta.gov/directives/attach/TEGL28-04_AttachB.pdf). Capacity
building outcomes should include products, models, and activities that
increase the capacity of the community college to provide training as
well as the impact each outcome has on the number of individuals the
community college can train and/or the quality of that training.
Outcomes and impacts of the proposed project should satisfactorily
address the industry-identified workforce need and the community
college capacity constraint identified by the partnership.
II. Award Information
1. Award Amount
ETA intends to fund approximately seventy-five (75) projects
through grants ranging from $500,000 to $2 million through this
competition; however, this does not preclude ETA from funding grants at
either a lower or higher amount, or funding a smaller or larger number
of projects, based on the type and the number of quality submissions.
Applicants are encouraged to submit budgets for quality projects at
whatever funding level is appropriate to the project. Nevertheless,
applicants should recognize that the funds available through this SGA
are intended to
[[Page 22909]]
complement additional leveraged resources rather than be the sole
source of funds for the proposal. A second competition planned for
Fall/Winter 2005 will request applications for the funding of
additional projects.
2. Period of Performance
ETA intends that the initial period of grant performance will fall
within a range of 24 to 36 months from the date of execution of the
grant documents. However, ETA will determine an appropriate period of
performance on a per-award basis that will allow for the completion of
capacity building and training efforts, and allow time for post-
training participant tracking in the workplace.
III. Eligibility Information
1. Eligible Applicants
In order to be eligible for consideration under this solicitation,
the applicant must be a publicly funded institution of higher education
that grants associate degrees. Therefore, applicants must demonstrate
that they comply with the definition of a community college in 20
U.S.C. 2371:
The term ``community college''--(A) means an institution of
higher education [as defined in 20 U.S.C. 1001] that provides not
less than a 2-year program that is acceptable for full credit
towards a bachelor's degree; and (B) includes tribally controlled
colleges and universities.
Applicants that fail to meet this eligibility requirement will be
removed from consideration prior to the technical review process.
Please note: (1) The applicant and fiscal agent for this grant
initiative must be the same entity; and (2) in accordance with Section
18 of the Lobbying Disclosure Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-65) (2 U.S.C.
1611), non-profit entities incorporated under Internal Revenue Service
Code section 501(c)(4) that engage in lobbying activities are not
eligible to receive Federal funds and grants.
2. Cost Sharing or Matching
Cost sharing, matching, or cost participation is not required for
eligibility; however, applicants are encouraged to leverage the
resources of the partnership whenever possible.
3. Other Grant Specifications
(1) Demonstrated Partnerships. To be considered for funding under
this SGA, the applicant must demonstrate that the proposed project will
be implemented by a strategic partnership that includes at least one
entity from each of the following categories: (1) The publicly-funded
Workforce Investment System, which may include state and local
Workforce Investment Boards, State Workforce Agencies, and One Stop
Career Centers and their partners; (2) the community college system;
(3) employers and industry-related organizations such as associations
and unions; and (4) the continuum of education, including the K-12
public education system. The strategic partnership may be a legally
organized partnership or joint venture, or a more informal
collaboration. As discussed above in Section III(1), the applicant
itself, for the purpose of being bound in the grant application and any
resulting award, must be a publicly funded community college.
(2) Required Capacity Building and Training Activities. To be
considered for funding under this SGA, proposed grant activities must
include a combination of capacity building and training activities that
target skills and competencies demanded by local high-growth/high-
demand industries. Training activities must result in college credit or
other credentials that are industry-recognized and indicate a level of
mastery and competence in a given field or function. Proposed capacity
building activities must address barriers that impede the ability of
the community college to meet local industry demand for workforce
training and must be directly linked to the specific training supported
under the grant. Applicants may propose a cross-cutting capacity
building and training strategy that will support training in more than
one high growth/high demand industry if the applicant can demonstrate
that skill needs in the identified industries are shared.
(3) Participants Eligible to Receive Training. Generally, the scope
of potential trainees is very broad. WIA Sec. 171(d) authorizes
demonstration programs to serve dislocated workers, incumbent workers,
and new entrants to the workforce. This authorization supports a broad
range of training for a variety of populations, including: Incumbent
workers who need new skills for jobs in demand up the career ladder or
because the skill needs for their current job have changed; untapped
labor pools such as immigrant workers, individuals with disabilities,
veterans, older workers, youth, etc; or entry level workers who need
basic skills and/or specific occupational skill training. The
identification of targeted and qualified trainees should be part of the
larger project planning process undertaken by the required partnership
and should relate to the workforce issue that is being addressed by the
training.
(4) Training Providers. The community college applicant must offer
appropriate credentials for all proposed training. Generally, it is
assumed that the applicant will also be the training provider. However,
ETA encourages applicants to be creative in integrating partner
resources into the training plan. For example: A business partner may
provide a qualified instructor to the community college; the community
college may provide on-site training for workers to take advantage of
business-loaned equipment; the training may be provided jointly; or
some of the training may utilize distance learning alternatives.
(5) Veterans Priority. In circumstances where a grant recipient
must choose between two equally qualified candidates for training, one
of whom is a veteran, the Jobs for Veterans Act (Pub. L. 107-288)
requires that grant recipients give the veteran priority of service by
admitting him or her. The Jobs for Veterans Act provides priority of
service to veterans and spouses of certain veterans for the receipt of
employment, training, and placement services in any job training
program directly funded, in whole or in part, by the Department of
Labor. Please note that, to obtain priority of service, a veteran must
meet the program's eligibility requirements. ETA Training and
Employment Guidance Letter (TEGL) No. 5-03 (September 16, 2003)
provides general guidance on the scope of the Job for Veterans Act and
its effect on current employment and training programs. TEGL No. 5-03,
along with additional guidance, is available at the ``Jobs for Veterans
Priority of Service'' Web site (https://www.doleta.gov/programs/vets).
IV. Application and Submission Information
1. Address To Request Application Package
This SGA contains all of the information and forms needed to apply
for grant funding.
2. Content and Form of Application Submission
The proposal must consist of two (2) separate and distinct parts,
Parts I and II. Applications that fail to adhere to the instructions in
this section will be considered non-responsive and may not be given
further consideration.
Part I of the proposal is the Cost Proposal and must include the
following three items.
The Standard Form (SF) 424, ``Application for Federal
Assistance'' (Appendix B) (available at https://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/
grants/sf424.pdf). The SF 424 must clearly
[[Page 22910]]
identify the applicant and be signed by an individual with authority to
enter into a grant agreement. Upon confirmation of an award, the
individual signing the SF 424 on behalf of the applicant shall be
considered the representative of the applicant.
All applicants for federal grant and funding opportunities
are required to have a Dun and Bradstreet (DUNS) number. See Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) Notice of Final Policy Issuance, 68 FR
38402 (June 27, 2003). Applicants must supply their DUNS number in item
5 of the new SF 424 issued by OMB (Rev. 9-2003). The DUNS
number is a nine-digit identification number that uniquely identifies
business entities. Obtaining a DUNS number is easy and there is no
charge. To obtain a DUNS number, access this Web site: https://
www.dunandbradstreet.com or call 1-866-705-5711.
SF 424A, the Budget Information Form (Appendix C)
(available at https://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/grants/sf424a.pdf). In
preparing the Budget Information Form, the applicant must provide a
concise narrative explanation to support the request. The budget
narrative should break down the budget and leveraged resources by
deliverable, should discuss cost per-participant, and should discuss
precisely how the administrative costs support the project goals.
Please note that applicants that fail to provide a SF 424, SF 424A
and/or a budget narrative will be removed from consideration prior to
the technical review process. Applicants are also encouraged, but not
required, to submit OMB Survey N. 1890-0014: Survey on Ensuring Equal
Opportunity for Applicants, which can be found in Attachment D.
Part II of the application is the Technical Proposal, which
demonstrates the applicant's capabilities to plan and implement the
CBJTG in accordance with the provisions of this solicitation. The
Technical Proposal is limited to twenty (20) double-spaced, single-
sided, 8.5 inch x 11 inch pages with 12 point text font and one-inch
margins. In addition, in attachments which may not exceed ten (10)
pages, the applicant may provide resumes, a list of staff positions to
be funded by the grant, statistical information and other related
material. The required letters of commitment from partners must be
submitted as additional attachments, which will not count against the
allowable 10-page limit on attachments. The applicant must reference
any partners in the text of the Technical Proposal. No cost data or
reference to prices should be included in the Technical Proposal. The
following information is required:
A two-page abstract summarizing the proposed project and
applicant profile information including: Applicant name, project title,
industry focus, partnership members, proposed training and capacity
building activities, funding level requested, and the amount of
leveraged resources;
A table of contents listing the application sections;
A time line outlining project activities and an
anticipated schedule for deliverables; and
A project description as described in the Evaluation
Criteria section at Part V(1) of this solicitation.
Please note that the abstract, table of contents, and time line are
not included in the twenty page limit. Applications that do not provide
Part II of the application will be removed from consideration prior to
the technical review process.
Applications may be submitted electronically on Grants.gov or in
hard-copy via mail or hand delivery. These processes are described in
further detail in section IV(3). Applicants submitting proposals in
hard-copy must submit an original signed application (including the SF
424) and one (1) ``copy-ready'' version free of bindings, staples or
protruding tabs to ease in the reproduction of the proposal by DOL.
Applicants submitting proposals in hard-copy are also requested, though
not required, to provide an electronic copy of the proposal on CD-ROM.
3. Submission Date, Times, and Addresses
The closing date for receipt of applications under this
announcement is July 6, 2005. Applications must be received at the
address below no later than 5 p.m. (Eastern Time). Applications sent by
e-mail, telegram, or facsimile (fax) will not be accepted. Applications
that do not meet the conditions set forth in this notice will not be
honored. No exceptions to the mailing and delivery requirements set
forth in this notice will be granted.
ETA will host CHJTG Virtual Prospective Applicant Conferences for
this grant competition. The dates and access information for these
prospective applicant conferences will be posted on ETA's Web site at
https://www.doleta.gov/business/Community-BasedJobTrainingGrants.cfm.
Mailed applications must be addressed to the U.S. Department of
Labor, Employment and Training Administration, Division of Federal
Assistance, Attention: Eric Luetkenhaus, Grant Officer, Reference SGA/
DFA-PY-04-10, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW., Room N-4438, Washington, DC
20210. Applicants are advised that mail delivery in the Washington area
may be delayed due to mail decontamination procedures. Hand delivered
proposals will be received at the above address. All overnight mail
will be considered to be hand-delivered and must be received at the
designated place by the specified closing date.
Applicants may apply online through Grants.gov (https://
www.grants.gov). It is strongly recommended that applicants using
Grants.gov immediately initiate and complete the ``Get Started''
registration steps at https://www.grants.gov/GetStarted. These steps may
take multiple days to complete, and this time should be factored into
plans for electronic application submission in order to avoid facing
unexpected delays that could result in the rejection of an application.
If submitting electronically through grants.gov, it would be
appreciated if the application submitted is saved as .doc, .pdf or .txt
files
Late Applications: Any application received after the exact date
and time specified for receipt at the office designated in this notice
will not be considered, unless it is received before awards are made
and it (a) was sent by U.S. Postal Service registered or certified mail
not later than the fifth calendar day before the date specified for
receipt of applications (e.g., an application required to be received
by the 20th of the month must be post marked by the 15th of that month)
or (b) was sent by U.S. Postal Service Express Mail or Grants.gov to
the addressee not later than 5 p.m. at the place of mailing or
electronic submission one working day prior to the date specified for
receipt of applications. It is highly recommended that online
submissions be completed one working day prior to the date specified
for receipt of applications to ensure that the applicant still has the
option to submit by U.S. Postal Service Express Mail in the event of
any electronic submission problems. ``Post marked'' means a printed,
stamped or otherwise placed impression (exclusive of a postage meter
machine impression) that is readily identifiable, without further
action, as having been supplied or affixed on the date of mailing by an
employee of the U.S. Postal Service. Therefore, applicants should
request the postal clerk to place a legible hand cancellation ``bull's
eye'' postmark on both the receipt and the package. Failure to adhere
to the above instructions will be a basis for a determination of
nonresponsiveness.
[[Page 22911]]
4. Intergovernmental Review
This funding opportunity is not subject to Executive Order (EO)
12372, ``Intergovernmental Review of Federal Programs.''
5. Funding Restrictions
Determinations of allowable costs will be made in accordance with
the applicable Federal cost principles, e.g., Educational Institution--
OMB Circular A-21. Disallowed costs are those charges to a grant that
the grantor agency or its representative determines not to be allowed
in accordance with the applicable Federal Cost Principles or other
conditions contained in the grant. Applicants will not be entitled to
reimbursement of pre-award costs.
Limitations on Cost Per-Participant. Because the costs of training
may vary considerably depending on the skills and competencies required
in different occupations in different industries, flexibility will be
provided on cost per-participant. However, applications for funding
will be reviewed to determine if the cost of the training is
appropriate and will produce the outcomes identified. Applicants should
demonstrate that the proposed cost per-participant is aligned with
existing price structures for similar training in the local area, if
available, or with the community college's existing price structures
for the type of program offered.
Administrative Costs. An entity that receives a CBJTG to carry out
a project or program may not use more than 5 percent of the total
amount of the grant to pay administrative costs associated with the
program or project. The Grant Officer reserves the right to negotiate
administrative cost levels prior to award. Administrative costs are
defined at 20 CFR 667.220. Although there will be administrative costs
associated with the management of the partnership as it relates to
specific grant activity, the primary use of funding should be to
support the capacity building and training activities.
ETA Intellectual Property Rights. Applicants should note that
grantees must agree to provide DOL/ETA a paid-up, nonexclusive and
irrevocable license to reproduce, publish, or otherwise use for federal
purposes all products developed, or for which ownership was purchased,
under an award, including, but not limited to, curricula, training
models, technical assistance products, and any related materials, and
to authorize them to do so. Such uses include, but are not limited to,
the right to modify and distribute such products worldwide by any
means, electronically or otherwise.
Legal Rules Pertaining to Inherently Religious Activities by
Organizations that Receive Federal Financial Assistance. The government
is prohibited from providing direct support to religious activity \1\.
See 29 CFR part 2, subpart D. Funds from these grants may not be used
to directly support religious instruction, worship, prayer,
proselytizing or other inherently religious practices. Neutral, secular
criteria that neither favor nor disfavor religion must be employed in
the selection of grant and sub-grant recipients. In addition, under the
WIA and DOL regulations implementing the Workforce Investment Act, a
recipient may not use direct Federal assistance to train a participant
in religious activities or employ participants to construct, operate,
or maintain any part of a facility that is used or to be used for
religious instruction or worship. See 29 CFR 37.6(f). Under WIA, ``no
individual shall be excluded from participation in, denied the benefits
of, subjected to discrimination under, or denied employment in the
administration of or in connection with, any such program or activity
because of race, color, religion, sex (except as otherwise permitted
under Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972), national origin,
age, disability, or political affiliation or belief''.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ The term ``direct'' support is used to describe funds or
other support that are provided ``directly'' by a governmental
entity or an intermediate organization with the same duties as a
governmental entity, as opposed to funds that an organization
receives ``indirectly'' as the result of the genuine and independent
private choice of a beneficiary within the meaning of the
Establishment Clause of the U.S. Constitution.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
6. Withdrawal of Applications
Applications may be withdrawn by written notice or telegram
(including mailgram) received at any time before an award is made.
Applications may be withdrawn in person by the applicant or by an
authorized representative thereof, if the representative's identity is
made known and the representative signs a receipt for the proposal.
V. Application Review Information
1. Evaluation Criteria
This section identifies and describes the criteria that will be
used to evaluate proposals for a Community-Based Job Training Grant.
These criteria and point values are:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Criterion Points
------------------------------------------------------------------------
A. Statement of Need........................................... 15
B. Linkages to Key Partners.................................... 20
C. Training and Capacity Building Plan......................... 25
D. Outcomes, Benefits, and Impact.............................. 30
E. Program Management and Organization Capacity................ 10
--------
Total Possible Points...................................... 100
------------------------------------------------------------------------
A. Statement of Need (15 Points)
Scoring on this criterion will be based on the extent to which the
applicant demonstrates a clear and specific need for Federal investment
in the proposed activities. Applicants must demonstrate this need by:
(a) Identifying the industry or industries of focus; (b) establishing
that the identified industry satisfies ETA's criteria for a high-
growth/high-demand industry in the local economy as described in Part
I(1) of this solicitation; (c) providing evidence of industry demand
for training in the local economy; and (d) describing in detail the
capacity challenges the community college faces that limit its ability
to provide sufficient quantity or quality of training to meet the
identified industry's demand. In addition, applicants should provide
evidence that the capacity challenge to be addressed by the grant was
identified in the context of the strategic partnership. Applicants may
draw from a variety of resources for supporting data, including:
traditional labor market information, such as projections; industry
data, such as from trade associations or direct information from the
local industry; and information on the local economy and other
transactional data, such as job vacancies, that are available locally.
Additional important factors for evaluation include:
The extent to which the targeted industry is high-growth
or high-demand in the context of the local economy;
Identification of local workforce or skills shortages
within the targeted industry;
Demonstrated existence of the identified capacity
constraint at the community college at which the grant activity will
take place;
Identification of the sources of the data used in the
analysis; and
If appropriate, the nature of larger strategic economic
development or workforce investment projects with which the proposed
project is aligned.
B. Linkages to Key Partners (20 Points)
The applicant must demonstrate that the proposed project will be
implemented by a strategic partnership that includes at least one
entity from each of four categories: (1) The
[[Page 22912]]
workforce investment system, which may include state and local
Workforce Investment Boards, State Workforce Agencies, and One Stop
Career Centers and their partners, as such terms are defined under WIA;
(2) community colleges; (3) employers and industry-related
organizations such as associations and unions; and (4) the continuum of
education, including the K-12 public education system. The applicant
must identify the partners, explain the meaningful role each partner
will play in the project, and document the resources leveraged from
each partner. Collaborating partners must verify their role through a
letter of commitment attached to the proposal. Applicants should also
identify resources leveraged from other organizations, including other
workforce investment system partners.
ETA encourages, and will be looking for, applications that go
beyond the minimum level of partnership and demonstrate broader,
substantive and sustainable partnerships. If appropriate, applicants
should also demonstrate the existence of a sustainability plan for the
strategic partnership beyond the funding period.
Scoring on this criterion will be based on: (1) Evidence that the
partnership contains each of the required entities; (2) the degree to
which each partner plays a committed role, either financial or non-
financial, in the proposed project; and (3) the robustness of the
applicant's plan for sustaining the partnership beyond the funding
period. Applications that do not have each of the four required
entities represented in the partnership cannot receive full points in
this section. The following elements will also be considered:
The overall completeness of the strategic partnership,
including its ability to manage all aspects and stages of the project
and to coordinate individual activities with the partnership as a
whole;
The scope of each partner's contribution, their knowledge
and experience concerning the proposed grant activities, and their
ability to impact the success of the project;
Evidence, including letters of support, that key partners
have expressed a clear commitment to the project and understand their
areas of responsibility;
Evidence of a plan for interaction between partners at
each stage of the project, from planning to execution; and
Evidence that the partnership has the capacity to achieve
the outcomes of the proposed project.
C. Training and Capacity Building Plan (25 Points)
The applicant must describe its proposed capacity building and
training strategies in full. The description should demonstrate: (1)
That the proposed project will address identified industry workforce or
skills shortages and identified capacity constraints at the community
college level; (2) that the proposed project clearly integrates
industry-driven capacity building and training activities; (3) that
proposed capacity building solutions are broad based and include an
appropriate range of activities; (4) that proposed training activities
occur within the context of a continuum of education and training that
supports long-term career growth, such as an articulated career ladder/
lattice; (5) that proposed training activities lead to appropriate
credentialing; and (6) that the applicant has a clear understanding of
the tasks required to successfully meet the objectives of the grant.
Scoring on this criterion will be based on evidence that the
applicant has developed effective, innovative training and capacity
building strategies and a plan of implementation that will satisfy the
six conditions described above. Additional factors that will be
considered include:
The existence of a work plan that is responsive to the
applicant's statement of need and includes specific goals, objectives,
activities, implementation strategies, and a timeline;
The demonstrated link between the proposed project and the
identified industry workforce or skills shortages and identified
capacity constraints at the community college level.
The extent to which the work plan provides an
understanding of the entire project's intended implementation;
The feasibility and sensibility of the timeframes for the
accomplishment of tasks;
The extent to which the budget is justified with respect
to the adequacy and reasonableness of resources requested;
The extent to which budget line items are consistent with
and tied to the work plan objectives;
Evidence that the proposed cost per-participant is aligned
with existing price structures for similar training; and
Evidence of a robust outreach strategy that includes the
dissemination of information regarding the project to others who would
benefit most, and if appropriate, recruitment of eligible participants.
D. Outcomes, Benefits, and Impact (30 Points)
Applicants must describe fully the predicted outcomes and products
resulting from the project. Applicants should particularly highlight
the benefits and impact of the outcomes and products on the larger
capacity constraint described in the statement of need. Scoring on this
criterion will be based on two broad elements:
1. The expected project outcomes are clearly identified,
measurable, realistic, and consistent with the objectives of the
project. Key elements for training and capacity building aspects of the
proposal are below.
a. Training: Applicants must track training outcome measures,
including all appropriate adult or youth Common Measures, such as
employment placement numbers and/or earnings gains and retention. Other
outcome measures that should be tracked include the number of
individuals awarded credentials or degrees, and outcome measures
specific to the proposed training project. Applications must also
identify the credential that participants will earn as a result of the
proposed training, and the employer-, industry-, vendor-, or state-
defined standards associated with the credential. If the credential
targeted by the training project is a certificate or performance-based
certification, applicants should either (a) demonstrate employer
engagement in the curriculum development process, or (b) indicate that
the certification will translate into concrete job advancement
opportunities with an employer.
b. Capacity Building: Applicants must clearly describe all
products, models, curricula, etc. that will be developed or acquired
with federal funds through the grant and indicate the number of
participants or entities who will benefit from the proposed activities.
Applicants must describe the data measures that will be used to measure
how the proposed capacity building activities impact the ability of the
community college to train workers for skills in demand by the targeted
industry. Applicants should indicate the long-term impact of the
proposed project on the ability of the community college to meet local
workforce demands.
2. The proposed outcomes will translate into the successful
alleviation of the community college's identified capacity challenges.
Additional factors that will be considered in the scoring of this
criterion include:
[[Page 22913]]
The ability of the applicant to achieve the stated
outcomes within the time frame of the grant; and
The appropriateness of the outcomes with respect to the
requested level of funding.
E. Program Management and Organization Capacity (10 Points)
To satisfy this criterion, applicants must describe their proposed
project management structure including, where appropriate, the
identification of a proposed project manager, and discuss the proposed
staffing pattern and the qualifications and experience of key staff
members. Applicants should also give evidence of the use of data
systems to track outcomes in a timely and accurate manner. The
applicant should include a description of organizational capacity and
the organization's track record in projects similar to that described
in the proposal and/or related activities of the primary partners.
Scoring under this criterion will be based on the extent to which
applicants provide evidence of the following:
The time commitment of the proposed staff is sufficient to
ensure proper direction, management, and timely completion of the
project;
The roles and contribution of staff, consultants, and
collaborative organizations are clearly defined and linked to specific
objectives and tasks;
The background, experience, and other qualifications of
the staff are sufficient to carry out their designated roles; and
The applicant organization has significant capacity to
accomplish the goals and outcomes of the project, including the ability
to collect and manage data in a way that allows consistent, accurate,
and expedient reporting.
2. Review and Selection Process
Applications for the Community-Based Job Training Grants will be
accepted after the publication of this announcement until the closing
date. A technical review panel will make a careful evaluation of
applications against the criteria set forth in Section V(A) of this
document. These criteria are based on the policy goals, priorities, and
emphases set forth in this SGA. Up to 100 points may be awarded to an
application, based on the required information described in Section
V(1). The ranked scores will serve as the primary basis for selection
of applications for funding, in conjunction with other factors such as
urban, rural, and geographic balance; the availability of funds; and
which proposals are most advantageous to the Government. The panel
results are advisory in nature and not binding on the Grant Officer,
who may consider any information that comes to his attention. DOL may
elect to award the grant(s) with or without discussions with the
applicants. Should a grant be awarded without discussions, the award
will be based on the applicant's signature on the SF 424, which
constitutes a binding offer.
VI. Award Administration Information
1. Award Notices
All award notifications will be posted on the ETA Homepage (https://
www.doleta.gov). Non-selected applicants will be notified by mail.
2. Administrative and National Policy Requirements
A. Administrative Program Requirements
All grantees will be subject to all applicable Federal laws,
regulations, and the applicable OMB Circulars. The grant(s) awarded
under this SGA will be subject to the following administrative
standards and provisions, if applicable:
1. Workforce Investment Boards--20 Code of Federal Regulations
(CFR) Part 667.220. (Administrative Costs).
2. Non-Profit Organizations--OMB Circulars A-122 (Cost Principles)
and 29 CFR Part 95 (Administrative Requirements).
3. Educational Institutions--OMB Circulars A-21 (Cost Principles)
and 29 CFR Part 95 (Administrative Requirements).
4. State and Local Governments--OMB Circulars A-87 (Cost
Principles) and 29 CFR Part 97 (Administrative Requirements).
5. Profit Making Commercial Firms--Federal Acquisition Regulation
(FAR)--48 CFR Part 31 (Cost Principles), and 29 CFR Part 95
(Administrative Requirements).
6. All entities must comply with 29 CFR Parts 93 and 98, and, where
applicable, 29 CFR Parts 96 and 99.
7. The following administrative standards and provisions may also
be applicable:
a. 29 CFR part 2, subpart D--Equal Treatment in Department of Labor
Programs for Religious Organizations, Protection of Religious Liberty
of Department of Labor Social Service Providers and Beneficiaries;
b. 29 CFR part 30--Equal Employment Opportunity in Apprenticeship
and Training;
c. 29 CFR part 31--Nondiscrimination in Federally Assisted Programs
of the Department of Labor--Effectuation of Title VI of the Civil
Rights Act of 1964;
d. 29 CFR part 32--Nondiscrimination on the Basis of Handicap in
Programs and Activities Receiving or Benefiting from Federal Financial
Assistance;
e. 29 CFR part 33--Enforcement of Nondiscrimination on the Basis of
Handicap in Programs or Activities Conducted by the Department of
Labor;
f. 29 CFR part 35--Nondiscrimination on the Basis of Age in
Programs or Activities Receiving Federal Financial Assistance from the
Department of Labor;
g. 29 CFR part 36--Nondiscrimination on the Basis of Sex in
Education Programs or Activities Receiving Federal Financial
Assistance;
h. 29 CFR part 37--Implementation of the Nondiscrimination and
Equal Opportunity Provisions of the Workforce Investment Act of 1998
(WIA).
8. In accordance with Section 18 of the Lobbying Disclosure Act of
1995 (Pub. L. 104-65) (2 U.S.C. 1611) non-profit entities incorporated
under Internal Revenue Service Code section 501(c) (4) that engage in
lobbying activities are not eligible to receive Federal funds and
grants.
Note: Except as specifically provided in this Notice, DOL/ETA's
acceptance of a proposal and an award of Federal funds to sponsor
any program(s) does not provide a waiver of any grant requirements
and/or procedures. For example, OMB Circulars require that an
entity's procurement procedures must ensure that all procurement
transactions are conducted, as much as practical, to provide open
and free competition. If a proposal identifies a specific entity to
provide services, the DOL/ETA's award does not provide the
justification or basis to sole source the procurement, i.e., avoid
competition, unless the activity is regarded as the primary work of
an official partner to the application.
B. Special Program Requirements
Evaluation. DOL may require that the program or project participate
in an evaluation of overall performance of CBJTGs. To measure the
impact of the CBJTGs, ETA may arrange for or conduct an independent
evaluation of the outcomes and benefits of the projects. Grantees must
agree to make records on participants, employers and funding available,
and to provide access to program operating personnel and participants,
as specified by the evaluator(s) under the direction of ETA, including
after the expiration date of the grant.
C. Reporting
The grantee is required to provide the reports and documents listed
below:
Quarterly Financial Reports. A Quarterly Financial Status Report
(SF 269) is required until such time as all
[[Page 22914]]
funds have been expended or the grant period has expired. Quarterly
reports are due 30 days after the end of each calendar year quarter.
Grantees must use ETA's On-Line Electronic Reporting System.
Quarterly Progress Reports. The grantee must submit a quarterly
progress report to the designated Federal Project Officer within 30
days after the end of each calendar year quarter. Two copies are to be
submitted providing a detailed account of activities undertaken during
that quarter. DOL may require additional data elements to be collected
and reported on either a regular basis or special request basis.
Grantees must agree to meet DOL reporting requirements. The quarterly
progress report should be in narrative form and should include:
1. General grant information, including: a general overview of
project progress, new developments and resolution of previous issues
and challenges; a discussion of planned grant activities and any other
grant-related events; an explanation of any issues/challenges
encountered and the proposed strategies to overcome them; a description
of major accomplishments, innovations, or promising approaches and
processes; product deliverables and outcomes resulting from the
project; and a status update on leveraged resources;
2. Information on all training, employer, and grant deliverable
outcomes as well as the anticipated impact of these outcomes on the
community college, industry partners, and the broader community;
3. Summary of the status of grant deliverables and dissemination
activities;
4. Highlights of promising approaches and success stories; and
5. Description of technical assistance needs.
Final Report. A draft final report must be submitted no later than
60 days prior to the expiration date of the grant. This report must
summarize project activities, employment outcomes, and related results
of the training project, and should thoroughly document capacity
building and training approaches. After responding to DOL questions and
comments on the draft report, three copies of the final report must be
submitted no later than the grant expiration date. Grantees must agree
to use a designated format specified by DOL for preparing the final
report.
VII. Agency Contacts
Any questions regarding this SGA should be faxed to Kevin Brumback,
Grants Management Specialist, Division of Federal Assistance, FAX
number (202) 693-2705. (This