Initiation of Five-Year (“Sunset”) Reviews, 22632-22634 [E5-2096]
Download as PDF
22632
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 83 / Monday, May 2, 2005 / Notices
Antidumping Duty Proceeding
Period
A–791–805 .............................................................................................................................................................
TAIWAN: Certain Circular Welded Carbon Steel Pipe & Tubes.
A–583–008 .............................................................................................................................................................
TAIWAN: Polyester Staple Fiber.
A–583–833 .............................................................................................................................................................
TAIWAN: Stainless Steel Plate in Coils.
A–583–830 .............................................................................................................................................................
THE PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF CHINA: Iron Construction Castings.
A–570–502 .............................................................................................................................................................
THE PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF CHINA: Pure Magnesium.
A–570–832 .............................................................................................................................................................
THE UNITED KINGDOM:Antifriction Bearings, Ball.
A–412–801 .............................................................................................................................................................
TURKEY: Welded Carbon Steel Pipe and Tube.
A–489–501 .............................................................................................................................................................
VENEZUELA: Silicomanganese.
A–307–820 .............................................................................................................................................................
Countervailing Duty Proceedings.
BELGIUM: Stainless Steel Plate in Coils.
C–423–809 .............................................................................................................................................................
BRAZIL: Iron Construction Castings.
C–351–504 .............................................................................................................................................................
CANADA: Softwood Lumber.
C–122–839 .............................................................................................................................................................
ITALY: Stainless Steel Plate in Coils.
C–475–823 .............................................................................................................................................................
SOUTH AFRICA: Stainless Steel Plate in Coils.
C–791–806 .............................................................................................................................................................
Suspension Agreements.
None..
In accordance with section 351.213(b)
of the regulations, an interested party as
defined by section 771(9) of the Act may
request in writing that the Secretary
conduct an administrative review. For
both antidumping and countervailing
duty reviews, the interested party must
specify the individual producers or
exporters covered by an antidumping
finding or an antidumping or
countervailing duty order or suspension
agreement for which it is requesting a
review, and the requesting party must
state why it desires the Secretary to
review those particular producers or
exporters. If the interested party intends
for the Secretary to review sales of
merchandise by an exporter (or a
producer if that producer also exports
merchandise from other suppliers)
which were produced in more than one
country of origin and each country of
origin is subject to a separate order, then
the interested party must state
specifically, on an order–by-order basis,
which exporter(s) the request is
intended to cover.
As explained in Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Proceedings:
Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 69
FR 23954 (May 6, 2003), the Department
has clarified its practice with respect to
the collection of final antidumping
duties on imports of merchandise where
intermediate firms are involved. The
public should be aware of this
clarification in determining whether to
VerDate jul<14>2003
19:05 Apr 29, 2005
Jkt 205001
request an administrative review of
merchandise subject to antidumping
findings and orders. See also the Import
Administration web site at https://
ia.ita.doc.gov.
Six copies of the request should be
submitted to the Assistant Secretary for
Import Administration, International
Trade Administration, Room 1870, U.S.
Department of Commerce, 14th Street &
Constitution Avenue, N.W.,
Washington, D.C. 20230. The
Department also asks parties to serve a
copy of their requests to the Office of
Antidumping/Countervailing
Operations, Attention: Sheila Forbes, in
room 3065 of the main Commerce
Building. Further, in accordance with
section 351.303(f)(l)(i) of the
regulations, a copy of each request must
be served on every party on the
Department’s service list.
The Department will publish in the
Federal Register a notice of ‘‘Initiation
of Administrative Review of
Antidumping or Countervailing Duty
Order, Finding, or Suspended
Investigation’’ for requests received by
the last day of May 2005. If the
Department does not receive, by the last
day of May 2005, a request for review
of entries covered by an order, finding,
or suspended investigation listed in this
notice and for the period identified
above, the Department will instruct
Customs and Border Protection to assess
antidumping or countervailing duties on
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
5/1/04—4/30/05
5/1/04—4/30/05
5/1/04—4/30/05
5/1/04—4/30/05
5/1/04—4/30/05
5/1/04—4/30/05
5/1/04—4/30/05
5/1/04—4/30/05
5/1/04—4/30/05
1/1/04—12/31/04
1/1/04—12/31/04
1/1/04—12/31/04
1/1/04—12/31/04
1/1/04—12/31/04
those entries at a rate equal to the cash
deposit of (or bond for) estimated
antidumping or countervailing duties
required on those entries at the time of
entry, or withdrawal from warehouse,
for consumption and to continue to
collect the cash deposit previously
ordered.
This notice is not required by statute
but is published as a service to the
international trading community.
Dated: April 26, 2005.
Holly A. Kuga,
Senior Office Director, AD/CVD Operations,
Office 4, for Import Administration.
[FR Doc. E5–2095 Filed 4–29–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
Initiation of Five-Year (‘‘Sunset’’)
Reviews
Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: In accordance with section
751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (‘‘the Act’’), the Department of
Commerce (‘‘the Department’’) is
automatically initiating five-year
(‘‘sunset’’) reviews of certain
antidumping and countervailing duty
orders. The International Trade
AGENCY:
E:\FR\FM\02MYN1.SGM
02MYN1
22633
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 83 / Monday, May 2, 2005 / Notices
Commission (‘‘the Commission’’) is
publishing concurrently with this notice
its notice of Institution of Five-Year
Review which covers these same orders.
DATES:
Effective Date: May 2, 2005.
Zev
Primor, Office 4, AD/CVD Operations,
Import Administration, International
Trade Administration, U.S. Department
of Commerce at (202) 482–4114, or Mary
Messer, Office of Investigations, U.S.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
International Trade Commission at (202)
205–3193.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The Department’s procedures for the
conduct of sunset reviews are set forth
in 19 CFR 351.218. Guidance on
methodological or analytical issues
relevant to the Department’s conduct of
sunset reviews is set forth in the
Department’s Policy Bulletin 98.3—
Policies Regarding the Conduct of Five-
DOC case No.
ITC case No.
731–TA–841 ..............
731–TA–846 ..............
PRC ...........................
Czech Republic .........
A–588–851 ................
731–TA–847 ..............
Japan .........................
A–485–805 ................
731–TA–849 ..............
Romania ....................
A–791–808 ................
731–TA–850 ..............
South Africa ...............
A–588–850 ................
731–TA–847 ..............
Japan .........................
A–201–827 ................
731–TA–848 ..............
Mexico .......................
A–588–810
A–588–852
A–580–841
C–580–842
A–533–806
C–533–807
A–570–815
A–570–856
731–TA–429
731–TA–853
731–TA–854
701–TA–401
731–TA–561
701–TA–318
731–TA–538
731–TA–851
Japan .........................
Japan .........................
South Korea ..............
South Korea ..............
India ...........................
India ...........................
PRC ...........................
PRC ...........................
Initiation of Reviews
In accordance with 19 CFR
351.218(c), we are initiating the sunset
reviews of the following antidumping
and countervailing duty orders and
suspended investigation:
Country
A–570–855 ................
A–851–802 ................
Year (‘‘Sunset’’) Reviews of
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Orders; Policy Bulletin, 63 FR 18871
(April 16, 1998) (‘‘Sunset Policy
Bulletin’’).
................
................
................
................
................
................
................
................
..............
..............
..............
..............
..............
..............
..............
..............
Filing Information
As a courtesy, we are making
information related to sunset
proceedings, including copies of the
Department’s regulations regarding
sunset reviews (19 CFR 351.218) and
Sunset Policy Bulletin, the Department’s
schedule of sunset reviews, case history
information (i.e., previous margins, duty
absorption determinations, scope
language, import volumes), and service
lists available to the public on the
Department’s sunset Internet website at
the following address: ‘‘https://
ia.ita.doc.gov/sunset/.’’
All submissions in these sunset
reviews must be filed in accordance
with the Department’s regulations
regarding format, translation, service,
and certification of documents. These
rules can be found at 19 CFR 351.303.
Also, we suggest that parties check the
Department’s sunset website for any
updates to the service list before filing
any submissions. The Department will
make additions to and/or deletions from
the service list provided on the sunset
website based on notifications from
parties and participation in these
reviews. Specifically, the Department
will delete from the service list all
VerDate jul<14>2003
19:05 Apr 29, 2005
Jkt 205001
Product
Non-Frozen Apple Juice Concentrate.
Small Diameter, Carbon & Alloy Seamless
Pipe.
Small Diameter, Carbon & Alloy Seamless
Pipe.
Small Diameter, Carbon & Alloy Seamless
Pipe.
Small Diameter, Carbon & Alloy Seamless
Pipe.
Large Diameter, Carbon & Alloy Seamless
Pipe.
Large Diameter, Carbon & Alloy Seamless
Pipe.
Mechanical Transfer Presses.
Structural Steel Beams.
Structural Steel Beams.
Structural Steel Beams.
Sulfanilic Acid.
Sulfanilic Acid.
Sulfanilic Acid.
Synthetic Indigo.
parties that do not submit a substantive
response to the notice of initiation.
Because deadlines in a sunset review
can be very short, we urge interested
parties to apply for access to proprietary
information under administrative
protective order (‘‘APO’’) immediately
following publication in the Federal
Register of the notice of initiation of the
sunset review. The Department’s
regulations on submission of proprietary
information and eligibility to receive
access to business proprietary
information under APO can be found at
19 CFR 351.304–306.
Information Required From Interested
Parties
Domestic interested parties (defined
in section 771(9)(C), (D), (E), (F), and (G)
of the Act and 19 CFR 351.102(b))
wishing to participate in these sunset
reviews must respond not later than 15
days after the date of publication in the
Federal Register of the notice of
initiation by filing a notice of intent to
participate. The required contents of the
notice of intent to participate are set
forth at 19 CFR 351.218(d)(1)(ii). In
accordance with the Department’s
regulations, if we do not receive a notice
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Standard, Line, & Pressure
Standard, Line, & Pressure
Standard, Line, & Pressure
Standard, Line, & Pressure
Standard, Line, & Pressure
Standard, Line, & Pressure
of intent to participate from at least one
domestic interested party by the 15-day
deadline, the Department will
automatically revoke the orders without
further review. See 19 CFR
351.218(d)(1)(iii).
If we receive an order-specific notice
of intent to participate from a domestic
interested party, the Department’s
regulations provide that all parties
wishing to participate in the sunset
review must file complete substantive
responses not later than 30 days after
the date of publication in the Federal
Register of the notice of initiation. The
required contents of a substantive
response, on an order-specific basis, are
set forth at 19 CFR 351.218(d)(3). Note
that certain information requirements
differ for respondent and domestic
parties. Also, note that the Department’s
information requirements are distinct
from the Commission’s information
requirements. Please consult the
Department’s regulations for
information regarding the Department’s
conduct of sunset reviews.1 Please
1 In comments made on the interim final sunset
regulations, a number of parties stated that the
proposed five-day period for rebuttals to
E:\FR\FM\02MYN1.SGM
Continued
02MYN1
22634
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 83 / Monday, May 2, 2005 / Notices
consult the Department’s regulations at
19 CFR Part 351 for definitions of terms
and for other general information
concerning antidumping and
countervailing duty proceedings at the
Department.
This notice of initiation is being
published in accordance with section
751(c) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.218(c).
Dated: April 25, 2005.
Holly A. Kuga,
Senior Office Director, AD/CVD Operations,
Office 4 for Import Administration.
[FR Doc. E5–2096 Filed 4–29–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
A–274–804
Notice of Initiation and Preliminary
Results of Changed Circumstances
Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review: Carbon and Certain Alloy
Steel Wire Rod from Trinidad and
Tobago
Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
(‘‘the Department’’) is initiating a
changed circumstances administrative
review of the antidumping duty order of
carbon and certain alloy steel wire rod
(‘‘steel wire rod’’) from Trinidad and
Tobago1 in response to a request from
the petitioners2 and respondent,
Caribbean Ispat Limited (‘‘CIL’’). Both
parties have requested that the
Department conduct a changed
circumstances review to determine
whether Mittal Steel Point Lisas Limited
(‘‘Mittal’’) is the successor–in-interest to
CIL, and, as such, is entitled to receive
the same antidumping duty treatment
accorded CIL.
EFFECTIVE DATE: May 2, 2005.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Dennis McClure or Victoria Cho at
(202) 482–5973 or (202) 482–5075,
respectively; AD/CVD Operations,
Office 3, Import Administration,
AGENCY:
substantive responses to a notice of initiation was
insufficient. This requirement was retained in the
final sunset regulations at 19 CFR 351.218(d)(4). As
provided in 19 CFR 351.302(b), however, the
Department will consider individual requests for
extension of that five-day deadline based upon a
showing of good cause.
1 See Notice of Amended Final Determination of
Sales at Less Than Fair Value and Antidumping
Duty Order: Carbon and Certain Alloy Steel Wire
Rod from Trinidad and Tobago, 67 FR 65944
(October 29, 2002) (‘‘Antidumping Order)
2 Gerdau Ameristeel U.S. Inc., ISG Georgetown
Inc., Keystone Consolidated Industries, Inc., and
North Star Steel Texas, Inc.
VerDate jul<14>2003
19:05 Apr 29, 2005
Jkt 205001
International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th
Street & Constitution Avenue, NW,
Washington, DC 20230.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background:
On October 29, 2002, the Department
published in the Federal Register an
antidumping duty order on steel wire
rod from Trinidad and Tobago. See
Antidumping Order. The current scope
of the merchandise subject to this order
was published in the Notice of Final
Results of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review: Carbon and
Certain Alloy Steel Wire Rod from
Trinidad and Tobago 70 FR 12648
(March 15, 2005). One of the companies
subject to the investigation was CIL. On
March 3, 2005, CIL notified the
Department of its name change and
stated that on January 31, 2005, CIL
legally changed its name to Mittal. See
March 3, 2005, letter from CIL to the
Secretary of Commerce. On March 21,
2005, the petitioners requested that the
Department conduct a changed
circumstances review to determine
whether Mittal is the successor–ininterest to CIL. See March 21, 2005,
letter from the petitioners to the
Secretary of Commerce. On April 6,
2005, CIL requested that the Department
initiate and conduct an expedited
changed circumstances review to
determine for purposes of the
antidumping law whether Mittal is the
successor–in-interest to CIL. The
Department has determined to conduct
the review on an expedited basis and
preliminarily finds that Mittal is the
successor–in-interest to CIL.
Initiation of Changed Circumstances
Review
Pursuant to section 751(b)(1) of the
Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (‘‘the
Act’), the Department will conduct a
changed circumstances review upon
request from an interested party or
receipt of information concerning an
antidumping duty order, when either of
these shows changed circumstances
sufficient to warrant a review of the
order. In this case, the Department finds
that the information submitted by the
petitioners and respondent provides
sufficient evidence of changed
circumstances to warrant a review to
determine whether Mittal is the
successor–in-interest to CIL. Thus, in
accordance with section 751(b) of the
Act, the Department is initiating a
changed circumstances review to
determine whether Mittal is the
successor–in-interest to CIL for
purposes of determining antidumping
duty liability with respect to imports of
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
steel wire rod from Trinidad and Tobago
produced and exported by CIL and
whether the order as applied to CIL
should apply to subject merchandise
manufactured and exported by Mittal.
Furthermore, 19 CFR 351.221(c)(3)(ii)
permits the Department to combine the
notice of initiation of a changed
circumstances review and the notice of
preliminary results in a single notice, if
the Department concludes that
expedited action is warranted. In this
case, the Department finds that the
information submitted provides
sufficient evidence of changed
circumstances to warrant a review.
Furthermore, we determine that
expedited action is warranted and we
preliminarily find that Mittal is the
successor–in-interest to CIL. Because we
have concluded that expedited action is
warranted, we are combining these
notices of initiation and preliminary
results.
Preliminary Results
In making a successor–in-interest
determination, the Department
examines several factors including, but
not limited to, changes in: (1)
Management; (2) production facilities;
(3) supplier relationships; and (4)
customer base. See, e.g., Notice of Final
Results of Changed Circumstances
Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review: Polychloroprene Rubber From
Japan, 67 FR 58 (Jan. 2, 2002); Brass
Sheet and Strip from Canada: Final
Results of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review, 57 FR 20460,
20462 (May 13, 1992). While no single
factor or combination of factors will
necessarily provide a dispositive
indication of a successor–in-interest
relationship, the Department will
generally consider the new company to
be the successor to the previous
company if the new company’s resulting
operation is not materially dissimilar to
that of its predecessor. See, e.g., Fresh
and Chilled Atlantic Salmon from
Norway; Final Results of Changed
Circumstances Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review, 64 FR 9979
(March 1, 1999); Industrial Phosphoric
Acid from Israel; Final Results of
Changed Circumstances Review, 59 FR
6944 (February 14, 1994). Thus, if the
evidence demonstrates that, with
respect to the production and sale of the
subject merchandise, the new company
operates as the same business entity as
the former company, the Department
will accord the new company the same
antidumping treatment as its
predecessor.
In accordance with 19 CFR
351.221(c)(3)(ii), we preliminarily
determine that Mittal is the successor–
E:\FR\FM\02MYN1.SGM
02MYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 83 (Monday, May 2, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 22632-22634]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E5-2096]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
Initiation of Five-Year (``Sunset'') Reviews
AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: In accordance with section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930,
as amended (``the Act''), the Department of Commerce (``the
Department'') is automatically initiating five-year (``sunset'')
reviews of certain antidumping and countervailing duty orders. The
International Trade
[[Page 22633]]
Commission (``the Commission'') is publishing concurrently with this
notice its notice of Institution of Five-Year Review which covers these
same orders.
DATES: Effective Date: May 2, 2005.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Zev Primor, Office 4, AD/CVD
Operations, Import Administration, International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce at (202) 482-4114, or Mary Messer, Office
of Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission at (202) 205-
3193.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The Department's procedures for the conduct of sunset reviews are
set forth in 19 CFR 351.218. Guidance on methodological or analytical
issues relevant to the Department's conduct of sunset reviews is set
forth in the Department's Policy Bulletin 98.3--Policies Regarding the
Conduct of Five-Year (``Sunset'') Reviews of Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Orders; Policy Bulletin, 63 FR 18871 (April 16,
1998) (``Sunset Policy Bulletin'').
Initiation of Reviews
In accordance with 19 CFR 351.218(c), we are initiating the sunset
reviews of the following antidumping and countervailing duty orders and
suspended investigation:
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DOC case No. ITC case No. Country Product
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
A-570-855..................... 731-TA-841................... PRC.......................... Non-Frozen Apple
Juice
Concentrate.
A-851-802..................... 731-TA-846................... Czech Republic............... Small Diameter,
Carbon & Alloy
Seamless
Standard, Line, &
Pressure Pipe.
A-588-851..................... 731-TA-847................... Japan........................ Small Diameter,
Carbon & Alloy
Seamless
Standard, Line, &
Pressure Pipe.
A-485-805..................... 731-TA-849................... Romania...................... Small Diameter,
Carbon & Alloy
Seamless
Standard, Line, &
Pressure Pipe.
A-791-808..................... 731-TA-850................... South Africa................. Small Diameter,
Carbon & Alloy
Seamless
Standard, Line, &
Pressure Pipe.
A-588-850..................... 731-TA-847................... Japan........................ Large Diameter,
Carbon & Alloy
Seamless
Standard, Line, &
Pressure Pipe.
A-201-827..................... 731-TA-848................... Mexico....................... Large Diameter,
Carbon & Alloy
Seamless
Standard, Line, &
Pressure Pipe.
A-588-810..................... 731-TA-429................... Japan........................ Mechanical
Transfer Presses.
A-588-852..................... 731-TA-853................... Japan........................ Structural Steel
Beams.
A-580-841..................... 731-TA-854................... South Korea.................. Structural Steel
Beams.
C-580-842..................... 701-TA-401................... South Korea.................. Structural Steel
Beams.
A-533-806..................... 731-TA-561................... India........................ Sulfanilic Acid.
C-533-807..................... 701-TA-318................... India........................ Sulfanilic Acid.
A-570-815..................... 731-TA-538................... PRC.......................... Sulfanilic Acid.
A-570-856..................... 731-TA-851................... PRC.......................... Synthetic Indigo.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Filing Information
As a courtesy, we are making information related to sunset
proceedings, including copies of the Department's regulations regarding
sunset reviews (19 CFR 351.218) and Sunset Policy Bulletin, the
Department's schedule of sunset reviews, case history information
(i.e., previous margins, duty absorption determinations, scope
language, import volumes), and service lists available to the public on
the Department's sunset Internet website at the following address:
``https://ia.ita.doc.gov/sunset/.''
All submissions in these sunset reviews must be filed in accordance
with the Department's regulations regarding format, translation,
service, and certification of documents. These rules can be found at 19
CFR 351.303. Also, we suggest that parties check the Department's
sunset website for any updates to the service list before filing any
submissions. The Department will make additions to and/or deletions
from the service list provided on the sunset website based on
notifications from parties and participation in these reviews.
Specifically, the Department will delete from the service list all
parties that do not submit a substantive response to the notice of
initiation.
Because deadlines in a sunset review can be very short, we urge
interested parties to apply for access to proprietary information under
administrative protective order (``APO'') immediately following
publication in the Federal Register of the notice of initiation of the
sunset review. The Department's regulations on submission of
proprietary information and eligibility to receive access to business
proprietary information under APO can be found at 19 CFR 351.304-306.
Information Required From Interested Parties
Domestic interested parties (defined in section 771(9)(C), (D),
(E), (F), and (G) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.102(b)) wishing to
participate in these sunset reviews must respond not later than 15 days
after the date of publication in the Federal Register of the notice of
initiation by filing a notice of intent to participate. The required
contents of the notice of intent to participate are set forth at 19 CFR
351.218(d)(1)(ii). In accordance with the Department's regulations, if
we do not receive a notice of intent to participate from at least one
domestic interested party by the 15-day deadline, the Department will
automatically revoke the orders without further review. See 19 CFR
351.218(d)(1)(iii).
If we receive an order-specific notice of intent to participate
from a domestic interested party, the Department's regulations provide
that all parties wishing to participate in the sunset review must file
complete substantive responses not later than 30 days after the date of
publication in the Federal Register of the notice of initiation. The
required contents of a substantive response, on an order-specific
basis, are set forth at 19 CFR 351.218(d)(3). Note that certain
information requirements differ for respondent and domestic parties.
Also, note that the Department's information requirements are distinct
from the Commission's information requirements. Please consult the
Department's regulations for information regarding the Department's
conduct of sunset reviews.\1\ Please
[[Page 22634]]
consult the Department's regulations at 19 CFR Part 351 for definitions
of terms and for other general information concerning antidumping and
countervailing duty proceedings at the Department.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ In comments made on the interim final sunset regulations, a
number of parties stated that the proposed five-day period for
rebuttals to substantive responses to a notice of initiation was
insufficient. This requirement was retained in the final sunset
regulations at 19 CFR 351.218(d)(4). As provided in 19 CFR
351.302(b), however, the Department will consider individual
requests for extension of that five-day deadline based upon a
showing of good cause.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
This notice of initiation is being published in accordance with
section 751(c) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.218(c).
Dated: April 25, 2005.
Holly A. Kuga,
Senior Office Director, AD/CVD Operations, Office 4 for Import
Administration.
[FR Doc. E5-2096 Filed 4-29-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P