Oneida Ltd., Sherrill, NY, Oneida Ltd., Oneida, NY; Notice of Termination of Investigation, 22709 [E5-2089]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 83 / Monday, May 2, 2005 / Notices through two years from the date of this certification, are eligible to apply for adjustment assistance under Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, and are eligible to apply for alternative trade adjustment assistance under Section 246 of the Trade Act of 1974.’’ and; ‘‘I further determine that all workers at Flowline Division of Markovitz Enterprises, Inc., Whiteville, North Carolina (TA–W– 56,152A) are denied eligibility to apply for adjustment assistance under Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974 and are denied eligibility to apply for alternative trade adjustment assistance under Section 246 of the Trade Act of 1974.’’ Signed at Washington, DC, this 14th day of April, 2005. Elliott S. Kushner, Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance. [FR Doc. E5–2075 Filed 4–29–05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4510–30–P DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Employment and Training Administration DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Employment And Training Administration [TA–W–56,637 and TA–W–56,637A] Oneida Ltd., Sherrill, NY, Oneida Ltd., Oneida, NY; Notice of Termination of Investigation Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated on February 25, 2005 in response to a worker petition filed by a company official on behalf of workers at Oneida Ltd., Sherrill, New York (TA–W–56,637) and Oneida Ltd. Oneida, New York (TA–W– 56,637A). The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. Consequently, further investigation would serve no purpose and the investigation has been terminated. Signed at Washington, DC this 4th day of April, 2005. Elliott S. Kushner, Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance. [FR Doc. E5–2089 Filed 4–29–05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4510–30–P [TA–W–56,515] DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Interstate Iron Works, Whitehouse, NJ; Notice of Termination of Investigation Employment and Training Administration Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, an investigation was initiated on February 7, 2005 in response to a petition filed by the State of New Jersey Trade Act Coordinator on behalf of workers at Interstate Iron Works, Whitehouse, New Jersey. The Department has been unable to locate company officials of the subject firm or to obtain the information necessary to reach a determination on worker group eligibility. Consequently, further investigation in this case would serve no purpose, and the investigation has been terminated. Notice of Determinations Regarding Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance Signed in Washington, DC, this 7th day of April, 2005. Richard Church, Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance. [FR Doc. E5–2085 Filed 4–29–05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4510–30–P VerDate jul<14>2003 19:05 Apr 29, 2005 Jkt 205001 In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, (19 U.S.C. 2273), the Department of Labor herein presents summaries of determinations regarding eligibility to apply for trade adjustment assistance for workers (TA–W) number and alternative trade adjustment assistance (ATAA) by (TA–W) number issued during the periods of March 2005. In order for an affirmative determination to be made and a certification of eligibility to apply for directly-impacted (primary) worker adjustment assistance to be issued, each of the group eligibility requirements of Section 222(a) of the Act must be met. I. Section (a)(2)(A) all of the following must be satisfied: A. A significant number or proportion of the workers in such workers’ firm, or an appropriate subdivision of the firm, have become totally or partially separated, or are threatened to become totally or partially separated; B. The sales or production, or both, of such firm or subdivision have decreased absolutely; and PO 00000 Frm 00083 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 22709 C. Increased imports of articles like or directly competitive with articles produced by such firm or subdivision have contributed importantly to such workers’ separation or threat of separation and to the decline in sales or production of such firm or subdivision; or II. Section (a)(2)(B) both of the following must be satisfied: A. A significant number or proportion of the workers in such workers’ firm, or an appropriate subdivision of the firm, have become totally or partially separated, or are threatened to become totally or partially separated; B. There has been a shift in production by such workers’ firm or subdivision to a foreign county of articles like or directly competitive with articles which are produced by such firm or subdivision; and C. One of the following must be satisfied: 1. The country to which the workers’ firm has shifted production of the articles is a party to a free trade agreement with the United States; 2. The country to which the workers’ firm has shifted production of the articles to a beneficiary country under the Andean Trade Preference Act, African Growth and Opportunity Act, or the Caribbean Basin Economic Recovery Act; or 3. There has been or is likely to be an increase in imports of articles that are like or directly competitive with articles which are or were produced by such firm or subdivision. Also, in order for an affirmative determination to be made and a certification of eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance as an adversely affected secondary group to be issued, each of the group eligibility requirements of Section 222(b) of the Act must be met. (1) Significant number or proportion of the workers in the workers’ firm or an appropriate subdivision of the firm have become totally or partially separated, or are threatened to become totally or partially separated; (2) The workers’ firm (or subdivision) is a supplier or downstream producer to a firm (or subdivision) that employed a group of workers who received a certification of eligibility to apply for trade adjustment assistance benefits and such supply or production is related to the article that was the basis for such certification; and (3) Either— (A) The workers’ firm is a supplier and the component parts it supplied for the firm (or subdivision) described in paragraph (2) accounted for at least 20 E:\FR\FM\02MYN1.SGM 02MYN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 83 (Monday, May 2, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 22709]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E5-2089]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment And Training Administration

[TA-W-56,637 and TA-W-56,637A]


Oneida Ltd., Sherrill, NY, Oneida Ltd., Oneida, NY; Notice of 
Termination of Investigation

    Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an 
investigation was initiated on February 25, 2005 in response to a 
worker petition filed by a company official on behalf of workers at 
Oneida Ltd., Sherrill, New York (TA-W-56,637) and Oneida Ltd. Oneida, 
New York (TA-W-56,637A).
    The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. 
Consequently, further investigation would serve no purpose and the 
investigation has been terminated.

    Signed at Washington, DC this 4th day of April, 2005.
Elliott S. Kushner,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E5-2089 Filed 4-29-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-P