Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request, 19968-19969 [05-7599]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
19968
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 72 / Friday, April 15, 2005 / Notices
emergency or administrative purposes,
and (2) any vehicle whose use is
expressly authorized by the EPA Project
Manager for this site. The public lands
affected by the closure order are, T. 13
N., R. 25 E., sec. 4, W1⁄2SE1⁄4SE1⁄4 and
SW1⁄4SW1⁄4; sec. 5, lots 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, and
7, and SW1⁄4NE1⁄4; sec. 8, lots 1, 3, and
4, and that portion of the SW1⁄4SW1⁄4
lying east of the eastern edge of the Haul
Road to the Plant at Yerington Mine;
sec. 9, W1⁄2NE1⁄4NE1⁄4, W1⁄2NE1⁄4,
NW1⁄4SE1⁄4NE1⁄4, E1⁄2NW1⁄4,
NW1⁄4NW1⁄4, E1⁄2SW1⁄4, and SW1⁄4SW1⁄4;
sec. 16, lots 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 9, 10, and 11,
NW1⁄4NE1⁄4, and N1⁄2NW1⁄4, and that
portion of lot 6 lying west of the
westerly right-of-way of State Route No.
339; sec. 17, lots 7, 14, and 15, and
those portions of the N1⁄2SW1⁄4NE1⁄4,
N1⁄2NW1⁄4, and NE1⁄4SE1⁄4NW1⁄4 lying
north and east of the northeasterly edge
of the Haul Road to the Plant at
Yerington Mine; sec. 20, lot 5, and those
portions of lots 2, 3, and 4, lying east of
the toe of the Anaconda Mine waste
rock dump; sec. 21, lots 1, 2, 3, and 4,
and SW1⁄4NW1⁄4, and that portion of the
SW1⁄4 lying north and east of the toe of
the Anaconda Mine waste rock dump,
and those portions of lot 6,
N1⁄2SW1⁄4SE1⁄4, SW1⁄4SW1⁄4SE1⁄4, and
W1⁄2SE1⁄4SW1⁄4SE1⁄4 lying west of the
toe of the Anaconda Mine waste rock
dump; sec. 28, those portions of the
N1⁄2NW1⁄4, and W1⁄2NW1⁄4NE1⁄4 lying
north of the toe of the Anaconda Mine
waste rock dump.
The public lands affected by the
restriction order constitute
approximately 1,380 acres of land.
These lands are depicted on maps in the
Nevada State Office, where copies of
these maps may be obtained.
Dated: April 11, 2005.
Donald T Hicks, Manager, Carson City Field
Office.
[FR Doc. 05–7556 Filed 4–14–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–HC–P
The plat, representing the dependent
resurveys and surveys in Township 2
North, Range 81 West, Sixth Principal
Meridian, Group 1397, Colorado, was
accepted March 25, 2005.
The supplemental plat, amending the
erroneously numbered lot 45, as shown
on the plat approved October 30, 1997,
to lot 47, and creating new lot 48, is
based upon the survey plats approved
November 29, 1984 and October 30,
1997 and the mineral survey M.S. 6771,
The Cleveland Placer, approved May 16,
1891, and the mineral survey M.S. 1148,
Rosa, cancelled August 9, 1984. This
supplemental plat was accepted
February 9, 2005.
The supplemental plat, correcting the
numerical errors in the longitudes for
the two witness posts on the Colorado/
Wyoming State Boundary and Interstate
Highway 25 (I–25) and the distance
between Witness Point 44+58.83 and
Mile Post 45, as shown on the plat
approved May 18, 1998, and is based
upon the dependent resurvey plat
approved May 18, 1998, and was
accepted March 31, 2005.
These plats and resurvey notes were
requested by the Bureau of Land
Management for administrative and
management purposes.
The plat of survey requested by the
Realty Staff, White River National
Forest, Glenwood Springs, Colorado, on
August 11, 2004, for the purpose of
identifying the boundaries of National
Forest lands to be conveyed and
patented out of federal ownership in
conjunction with a land exchange at the
base of the ski area in Vail, Colorado,
under Group 1415 was accepted
February 3, 2005.
This plat was requested by the U.S.
Forest Service, to facilitate a land
exchange, and for administrative and
management purposes.
Paul Lukacovic,
Acting Chief Cadastral Surveyor for Colorado.
[FR Doc. 05–7539 Filed 4–14–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–JB–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Land Management
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
Colorado: Filing of Plats of Survey
April 5, 2005.
Summary: The plats of survey of the
following described land will be
officially filed in the Colorado State
Office, Bureau of Land Management,
Lakewood, Colorado, effective 10 a.m.,
April 6, 2005. All inquiries should be
sent to the Colorado State Office, Bureau
of Land Management, 2850 Youngfield
Street, Lakewood, Colorado 80215–
7093.
VerDate jul<14>2003
14:34 Apr 14, 2005
Jkt 205001
Submission for OMB Review;
Comment Request
International Trade
Commission.
ACTION: Agency proposal for the
collection of information submitted to
the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) for review; comment request.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: In accordance with the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction
PO 00000
Frm 00050
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35), the
Commission has submitted a proposal
for the collection of information to OMB
for approval. The proposed information
collection is a 3-year extension of the
current ‘‘generic clearance’’ (approved
by the Office of Management and
Budget under control No. 3117–0016)
under which the Commission can issue
information collections (specifically,
producer, importer, purchaser, and
foreign producer questionnaires and
certain institution notices) for the
following types of import injury
investigations: antidumping duty,
countervailing duty, escape clause,
NAFTA safeguard, market disruption,
and ‘‘interference with programs of the
USDA.’’
DATES: Written comments and
recommendations for the proposed
information collection should be
submitted to OMB within 30 days of the
date this notice appears in the Federal
Register. Comments should be sent to
David Rostker, OMB Desk Officer, Room
10202, New Executive Office Building,
Washington, DC 20503.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Copies of the proposed information
collection proposal can be obtained
from Debra Baker, Office of
Investigations, U.S. International Trade
Commission (telephone no. 202–205–
3180; e-mail Debra.Baker@usitc.gov).
General information concerning the
Commission may also be obtained by
accessing its Internet server (https://
www.usitc.gov).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: (1) The
proposed information collection
consists of five basic forms, namely the
Sample Producers’, Sample Importers’,
Sample Purchasers’, and Sample
Foreign Producers’ questionnaires
(separate forms are provided for
questionnaires issued for investigations
and five-year reviews) and
Sample Notice of Institution for FiveYear Reviews. The types of items
contained within the questionnaires and
institution notice are largely determined
by statute. Actual questions formulated
for use in a specific investigation
depend upon such factors as the nature
of the industry, the relevant issues, the
ability of respondents to supply the
data, and the availability of data from
secondary sources.
(2) The information collected through
questionnaires issued under the generic
clearance for import injury
investigations are consolidated by
Commission staff and form much of the
statistical base for the Commission’s
determinations. Affirmative
Commission determinations in
antidumping and countervailing duty
E:\FR\FM\15APN1.SGM
15APN1
19969
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 72 / Friday, April 15, 2005 / Notices
investigations result in the imposition of
additional duties on imports entering
the United States. If the Commission
makes an affirmative determination in a
five-year review, the existing
antidumping or countervailing duty
order will remain in place. The data
developed in escape-clause, market
disruption, and interference-withUSDA-program investigations (if the
Commission finds affirmatively) are
used by the President/U.S. Trade
Representative to determine the type of
relief, if any, to be provided to domestic
industries. The submissions made to the
Commission in response to the notices
of institution of five-year reviews form
the basis for the Commission’s
determination of whether a full or
expedited review should be conducted.
(3) Likely respondents consist of
businesses (including foreign
businesses) or farms that produce,
import, or purchase products under
investigation. Estimated total annual
reporting burden for the period July
2005–June 2008 that will result from the
collections of information is presented
below.
TABLE 1.—PROJECTED ANNUAL BURDEN DATA, BY TYPE OF INFORMATION COLLECTION, JULY 2005–JUNE 2008
Producer
questionnaires
Item
Importer questionnaires
Purchaser
questionnaires
Foreign producer questionnaires
Institution notices for 5-year
reviews
Total
Estimated burden hours imposed annually for July 2005–June 2008
Number of respondents ...........................
Frequency of response ............................
Total annual responses ...........................
Hours per response .................................
952
1
952
52.7
1,370
1
1,370
38.5
1,070
1
1,070
26.3
814
1
814
50.6
61
1
61
14.8
4,267
1
4,267
40.6
Total hours ........................................
50,170
52,745
28,141
41,188
904
173,148
(4) Responses to the questionnaires
are mandatory. No record-keeping
burden is known to result from the
proposed collections of information.
Issued: April 12, 2005.
By order of the Commission.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 05–7599 Filed 4–14–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation Nos. 731–TA–1071 and 1072
(Final)]
Magnesium From China and Russia
Determinations
On the basis of the record 1 developed
in the subject investigations, the United
States International Trade Commission
(Commission) determines, pursuant to
section 735(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930
(19 U.S.C. 1673d(b)) (the Act), that an
industry in the United States is
materially injured by reason of imports
from China and Russia of magnesium,2
provided for in subheadings 8104.11.00,
8104.19.00, 8104.30.00, and 8104.90.00
of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of
the United States, that have been found
by the Department of Commerce
(Commerce) to be sold in the United
1 The record is defined in sec. 207.2(f) of the
Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19
CFR 207.2(f)).
2 Commissioners Marcia E. Miller and Jennifer A.
Hillman voted with the majority, except that they
found granular magnesium to be a separate like
product and found subject imports of granular
magnesium from Russia to be negligible.
VerDate jul<14>2003
15:30 Apr 14, 2005
Jkt 205001
States at less than fair value (LTFV).
With regard to U.S. imports from China,
the Commission also makes a negative
finding with regard to critical
circumstances.
2005. The views of the Commission are
contained in USITC Publication 3763
(April 2005), entitled Magnesium from
China and Russia: Investigation Nos.
731–TA–1071 and 1072 (Final).
Background
The Commission instituted these
investigations effective February 27,
2004, following receipt of a petition
filed with the Commission and
Commerce by US Magnesium Corp.
(‘‘US Magnesium’’), Salt Lake City, UT;
the United Steelworkers of America,
Local 8319, Salt Lake City, UT; and the
Glass, Molders, Pottery, Plastics &
Allied Workers International, Local 374,
Long Beach, CA. The final phase of
these investigations was scheduled by
the Commission following notification
of preliminary determinations by
Commerce that imports of magnesium
from China and Russia were being sold
at LTFV within the meaning of section
733(b) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1673b(b)).
Notice of the scheduling of the final
phase of the Commission’s
investigations and of a public hearing to
be held in connection therewith was
given by posting copies of the notice in
the Office of the Secretary, U.S.
International Trade Commission,
Washington, DC, and by publishing the
notice in the Federal Register of
October 21, 2004 (69 FR 61860). The
hearing was held in Washington, DC, on
February 23, 2005, and all persons who
requested the opportunity were
permitted to appear in person or by
counsel.
The Commission transmitted its
determinations in these investigations to
the Secretary of Commerce on April 11,
Issued: April 11, 2005.
By order of the Commission.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 05–7600 Filed 4–14–05; 8:45 am]
PO 00000
Frm 00051
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 337–TA–537]
In the Matter of Certain Weather
Stations and Components Thereof;
Notice of Investigation
U.S. International Trade
Commission.
ACTION: Institution of investigation
pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 1337.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that a
complaint was filed with the U.S.
International Trade Commission on
March 15, 2005 under section 337 of the
Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19
U.S.C. 1337, on behalf of Richmond IP
Holdings, LLC. A letter supplementing
the complaint was filed on April 4,
2005. The complaint, as supplemented,
alleges violations of section 337 in the
importation into the United States, the
sale for importation, and the sale within
the United States after importation of
certain weather stations and
components thereof by reason of
infringement of claim 1 of U.S. Patent
No. 5,978,738 and claims 26 and 30 of
E:\FR\FM\15APN1.SGM
15APN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 72 (Friday, April 15, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 19968-19969]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-7599]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request
AGENCY: International Trade Commission.
ACTION: Agency proposal for the collection of information submitted to
the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review; comment request.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: In accordance with the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction
Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35), the Commission has submitted a proposal for
the collection of information to OMB for approval. The proposed
information collection is a 3-year extension of the current ``generic
clearance'' (approved by the Office of Management and Budget under
control No. 3117-0016) under which the Commission can issue information
collections (specifically, producer, importer, purchaser, and foreign
producer questionnaires and certain institution notices) for the
following types of import injury investigations: antidumping duty,
countervailing duty, escape clause, NAFTA safeguard, market disruption,
and ``interference with programs of the USDA.''
DATES: Written comments and recommendations for the proposed
information collection should be submitted to OMB within 30 days of the
date this notice appears in the Federal Register. Comments should be
sent to David Rostker, OMB Desk Officer, Room 10202, New Executive
Office Building, Washington, DC 20503.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Copies of the proposed information
collection proposal can be obtained from Debra Baker, Office of
Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission (telephone no. 202-
205-3180; e-mail Debra.Baker@usitc.gov). General information concerning
the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server
(https://www.usitc.gov).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: (1) The proposed information collection
consists of five basic forms, namely the Sample Producers', Sample
Importers', Sample Purchasers', and Sample Foreign Producers'
questionnaires (separate forms are provided for questionnaires issued
for investigations and five-year reviews) and
Sample Notice of Institution for Five-Year Reviews. The types of
items contained within the questionnaires and institution notice are
largely determined by statute. Actual questions formulated for use in a
specific investigation depend upon such factors as the nature of the
industry, the relevant issues, the ability of respondents to supply the
data, and the availability of data from secondary sources.
(2) The information collected through questionnaires issued under
the generic clearance for import injury investigations are consolidated
by Commission staff and form much of the statistical base for the
Commission's determinations. Affirmative Commission determinations in
antidumping and countervailing duty
[[Page 19969]]
investigations result in the imposition of additional duties on imports
entering the United States. If the Commission makes an affirmative
determination in a five-year review, the existing antidumping or
countervailing duty order will remain in place. The data developed in
escape-clause, market disruption, and interference-with-USDA-program
investigations (if the Commission finds affirmatively) are used by the
President/U.S. Trade Representative to determine the type of relief, if
any, to be provided to domestic industries. The submissions made to the
Commission in response to the notices of institution of five-year
reviews form the basis for the Commission's determination of whether a
full or expedited review should be conducted.
(3) Likely respondents consist of businesses (including foreign
businesses) or farms that produce, import, or purchase products under
investigation. Estimated total annual reporting burden for the period
July 2005-June 2008 that will result from the collections of
information is presented below.
Table 1.--Projected Annual Burden Data, by Type of Information Collection, July 2005-June 2008
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Producer Purchaser Foreign Institution
Item question- Importer question- producer notices for 5- Total
naires questionnaires naires questionnaires year reviews
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Estimated burden hours imposed annually for July 2005-June 2008
---------------------------------------------------------
Number of respondents................................... 952 1,370 1,070 814 61 4,267
Frequency of response................................... 1 1 1 1 1 1
Total annual responses.................................. 952 1,370 1,070 814 61 4,267
Hours per response...................................... 52.7 38.5 26.3 50.6 14.8 40.6
-----------------
Total hours......................................... 50,170 52,745 28,141 41,188 904 173,148
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(4) Responses to the questionnaires are mandatory. No record-
keeping burden is known to result from the proposed collections of
information.
Issued: April 12, 2005.
By order of the Commission.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 05-7599 Filed 4-14-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
