Emergency Response and Crisis Management Grant Program, 19736-19738 [05-7531]
Download as PDF
19736
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 71 / Thursday, April 14, 2005 / Notices
Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the
United States (HTSUS), cannot be
supplied by the domestic industry in
commercial quantities in a timely
manner. The petition requests that
men’s and boys’ woven cotton shirts
and women’s and girls woven cotton
blouses of such fabrics assembled in one
or more CBTPA beneficiary countries be
eligible for preferential treatment under
the CBTPA. CITA hereby solicits public
comments on this petition, in particular
with regard to whether these fabrics can
be supplied by the domestic industry in
commercial quantities in a timely
manner. Comments must be submitted
by April 29, 2005 to the Chairman,
Committee for the Implementation of
Textile Agreements, Room 3001, United
States Department of Commerce, 14th
and Constitution, NW., Washington, DC
20230.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Janet E. Heinzen, International Trade
Specialist, Office of Textiles and
Apparel, U.S. Department of Commerce,
(202) 482-3400.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Authority: Section 213(b)(2)(A)(v)(II) of the
CBERA, as added by Section 211(a) of the
CBTPA; Section 6 of Executive Order No.
13191 of January 17, 2001.
Background
The CBTPA provides for quota- and
duty-free treatment for qualifying textile
and apparel products. Such treatment is
generally limited to products
manufactured from yarns or fabrics
formed in the United States. The CBTPA
also provides for quota- and duty-free
treatment for apparel articles that are
both cut (or knit-to-shape) and sewn or
otherwise assembled in one or more
CBTPA beneficiary countries from fabric
or yarn that is not formed in the United
States, if it has been determined that
such fabric or yarn cannot be supplied
by the domestic industry in commercial
quantities in a timely manner. In
Executive Order No. 13191, the
President delegated to CITA the
authority to determine whether yarns or
fabrics cannot be supplied by the
domestic industry in commercial
quantities in a timely manner under the
CBTPA and directed CITA to establish
procedures to ensure appropriate public
participation in any such determination.
On March 6, 2001, CITA published
procedures that it will follow in
considering requests. (66 FR 13502).
On April 8, 2005, the Chairman of
CITA received a petition from Oxford
Industries alleging that certain 100
percent cotton, 2 x 2 twill weave,
flannel fabrics, of ring spun and combed
2 ply yarns, of the specifications
VerDate jul<14>2003
19:36 Apr 13, 2005
Jkt 205001
detailed below, classified HTSUS
subheading 5208.43.0000, cannot be
supplied by the domestic industry in
commercial quantities in a timely
manner and requesting quota- and dutyfree treatment under the CBTPA for
men’s and boys’ woven cotton shirts
and women’s and girls’ woven cotton
blouses that are cut and sewn in one or
more CBTPA beneficiary countries from
such fabrics.
Specifications:
Petitioner Style No:
Fiber Content:
Weight:
Width:
Thread Count:
Yarn Number:
Weave:
Finish:
1662
100% Cotton
150 - 160 g/m2
148 - 152 centimeters
50 - 52 ends per cm (25-26 x
two plies)
42 - 46 filling picks per cm
(21-23 x two plies)
92 - 98 thread per square cm
(46-49 x two plies)
34 metric warp and filling, ring
spun combed, two ply average yarn number 60-62.
2 x 2 twill
Yarns of different colors;
napped
The petitioner emphasizes that the
construction of the fabric must be
exactly or nearly exactly as specified or
the fabric will not be suitable for its
intended uses.
CITA is soliciting public comments
regarding this request, particularly with
respect to whether these fabrics can be
supplied by the domestic industry in
commercial quantities in a timely
manner. Also relevant is whether other
fabrics that are supplied by the domestic
industry in commercial quantities in a
timely manner are substitutable for the
fabric for purposes of the intended use.
Comments must be received no later
than April 29, 2005. Interested persons
are invited to submit six copies of such
comments or information to the
Chairman, Committee for the
Implementation of Textile Agreements,
room 3100, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th and Constitution
Avenue, N.W., Washington, DC 20230.
If a comment alleges that these fabrics
can be supplied by the domestic
industry in commercial quantities in a
timely manner, CITA will closely
review any supporting documentation,
such as a signed statement by a
manufacturer of the fabric stating that it
produces the fabric that is the subject of
the request, including the quantities that
can be supplied and the time necessary
to fill an order, as well as any relevant
information regarding past production.
CITA will protect any business
confidential information that is marked
‘‘business confidential’’ from disclosure
to the full extent permitted by law.
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
CITA generally considers specific
details, such as quantities and lead
times for providing the subject product
as business confidential. However,
information such as the names of
domestic manufacturers who were
contacted, questions concerning the
capability to manufacture the subject
product, and the responses thereto
should be available for public review to
ensure proper public participation in
the process. If this is not possible, an
explanation of the necessity for treating
such information as business
confidential must be provided. CITA
will make available to the public nonconfidential versions of the request and
non-confidential versions of any public
comments received with respect to a
request in room 3100 in the Herbert
Hoover Building, 14th and Constitution
Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230.
Persons submitting comments on a
request are encouraged to include a nonconfidential version and a nonconfidential summary.
D. Michael Hutchinson,
Acting Chairman, Committee for the
Implementation of Textile Agreements.
[FR Doc. 05–7586 Filed 4–12–05; 2:33 pm]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Emergency Response and Crisis
Management Grant Program
Office of Safe and Drug-Free
Schools, Department of Education.
ACTION: Notice of proposed priority and
other application requirements.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: We propose a priority and
other application requirements under
the Emergency Response and Crisis
Management Grant program. We may
use this priority and the application
requirements for competitions in Fiscal
Year (FY) 2005 and in later years. We
take this action to focus Federal
financial assistance on supporting
grants to local educational agencies
(LEAs) in improving and strengthening
emergency response and crisis
management plans that address the four
phases of crisis planning: Prevention/
Mitigation, Preparedness, Response, and
Recovery.
DATES: We must receive your comments
on or before May 16, 2005.
ADDRESSES: Address all comments about
this proposed priority and other
application requirements to Sara Strizzi,
400 Maryland Avenue, SW., room
3E320, Washington, DC 20202–6450. If
you prefer to send your comments
E:\FR\FM\14APN1.SGM
14APN1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 71 / Thursday, April 14, 2005 / Notices
through the Internet, use the following
address: sara.strizzi@ed.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sara
Strizzi. Telephone: (202) 708–4850 or
via Internet: sara.strizzi@ed.gov.
If you use a telecommunications
device for the deaf (TDD), you may call
the Federal Relay Service (FRS) at 1–
888–877–8339.
Individuals with disabilities may
obtain this document in an alternative
format (e.g. Braille, large print,
audiotape, or computer diskette) on
request to the contact person listed
under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Invitation To Comment
We invite you to submit comments
regarding this proposed priority and
other application requirements.
We invite you to assist us in
complying with the specific
requirements of Executive Order 12866
and its overall requirement of reducing
regulatory burden that might result from
this proposed priority and other
application requirements. Please let us
know of any further opportunities we
should take to reduce potential costs or
increase potential benefits while
preserving the effective and efficient
administration of the program.
During and after the comment period,
you may inspect all public comments
about this proposed priority and other
application requirements in 400
Maryland Ave, SW., room 3E320,
Washington, DC, between the hours of
8:30 a.m. and 4 p.m., eastern time,
Monday through Friday of each week
except Federal holidays.
Assistance to Individuals With
Disabilities in Reviewing the
Rulemaking Record
On request, we will supply an
appropriate aid, such as a reader or
print magnifier, to an individual with a
disability who needs assistance to
review the comments or other
documents in the public rulemaking
record for this proposed priority and
other application requirements. If you
want to schedule an appointment for
this type of aid, please contact the
person listed under FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT.
Background: The events of September
11, 2001, made schools and
communities aware that, in addition to
planning for traditional crises and
emergencies, schools must now plan to
respond to possible terrorist attacks on
campus or in the community. We
propose this priority and other
application requirements under the Safe
VerDate jul<14>2003
19:36 Apr 13, 2005
Jkt 205001
and Drug-Free Schools and
Communities National Programs to
focus on the important need of LEAs to
strengthen and improve school crisis
plans in coordination with communitybased partners.
We will announce the final priority
and other application requirements in a
notice in the Federal Register. We will
determine the final priority and other
application requirements after
considering responses to this notice and
other information available to the
Department. This notice does not
preclude us from proposing or using
additional priorities or other application
requirements, subject to meeting
applicable rulemaking requirements.
Note: This notice does not solicit
applications. In any year in which we choose
to use this proposed priority and other
application requirements, we invite
applications through a notice in the Federal
Register. When inviting applications we
designate the priority as absolute,
competitive preference, or invitational. The
effect of each type of priority follows:
Absolute priority: Under an absolute
priority we consider only applications
that meet the priority (34 CFR
75.105(c)(3)).
Competitive preference priority:
Under a competitive preference priority
we give competitive preference to an
application by either (1) awarding
additional points, depending on how
well or the extent to which the
application meets the competitive
priority (34 CFR 75.105(c)(2)(i)); or (2)
selecting an application that meets the
competitive priority over an application
of comparable merit that does not meet
the priority (34 CFR 75.105(c)(2)(ii)).
Invitational priority: Under an
invitational priority we are particularly
interested in applications that meet the
invitational priority. However, we do
not give an application that meets the
invitational priority a competitive or
absolute preference over other
applications (34 CFR 75.105(c)(1)).
Priority: Improvement and
Strengthening of School Emergency
Response and Crisis Management Plans.
This proposed priority supports local
educational agency (LEA) projects to
improve and strengthen emergency
response and crisis management plans,
at the district and school-building level,
addressing the four phases of crisis
planning: Prevention/Mitigation,
Preparedness, Response, and Recovery.
Plans must include: (1) training for
school personnel and students in
emergency response procedures; (2)
coordination with local law
enforcement, public safety, health, and
mental health agencies; and (3) a
method for communicating school
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
19737
emergency response policies and
reunification procedures to parents and
guardians.
Other Application Requirements: We
propose establishing the following
application requirements:
1. Partner Agreements. To be
considered for a grant award, an
applicant must include in its
application an agreement that details
the participation of each of the
following five community-based
partners: law enforcement, public
safety, health, mental health, and the
head of the applicant’s local government
(for example the mayor, city manager, or
county executive). The agreement must
include a description of each partner’s
roles and responsibilities in improving
and strengthening emergency response
plans at the district and school-building
level, a description of each partner’s
commitment to the continuation and
continuous improvement of emergency
response plans at the district and
school-building level, and an authorized
signature representing the LEA and each
partner acknowledging the agreement. If
one or more of the five partners listed
is not present in the applicant’s
community, or cannot feasibly
participate, the agreement must explain
the absence of each missing partner. To
be considered eligible for funding,
however, an application must include a
signed agreement between the LEA, a
law enforcement partner, and at least
one of the other required partners
(public safety, health, mental health, or
head of local government).
Applications that fail to include the
required agreement, including
information on partners’ roles and
responsibilities and on their
commitment to continuation and
continuous improvement (with
signatures and explanations for missing
signatures as specified above), will not
be read.
Although this program requires
partnerships with other parties,
administrative direction and fiscal
control for the project must reside with
the LEA.
2. Coordination with State or Local
Homeland Security Plan. All emergency
response and crisis management plans
must be coordinated with the Homeland
Security Plan of the State or locality in
which the LEA is located. All States
submitted such a plan to the
Department of Homeland Security on
January 30, 2004. To ensure that
emergency services are coordinated, and
to avoid duplication of effort within
States and localities, applicants must
include in their applications an
assurance that the LEA will coordinate
with and follow the requirements of
E:\FR\FM\14APN1.SGM
14APN1
19738
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 71 / Thursday, April 14, 2005 / Notices
their State or local Homeland Security
Plan for emergency services and
initiatives.
3. Support of the National Incident
Management System. Applicants also
must also agree to support the
implementation of the National Incident
Management System (NIMS). In
accordance with Homeland Security
Presidential Directive/HSPD–5, the
NIMS provides a consistent approach
for Federal, State, and local
governments to work effectively and
efficiently together to prepare for,
prevent, respond to, and recover from
domestic incidents, regardless of cause,
size, or complexity.
Specifically, applicants must include
in their applications an assurance that,
by September 30, 2005, they will
complete, to the maximum extent
possible, the following steps to support
NIMS implementation:
• Administer the NIMS Awareness
Course: ‘‘National Incident Management
System (NIMS), An Introduction’’ (IS
700) to key district and school staff.
This independent study course,
developed by the Emergency
Management Institute (EMI), explains
the purpose, principles, key
components, and benefits of the NIMS.
The course is available online and will
take between forty-five minutes to three
hours to complete. The course is
available on the EMI Web site at: http:/
/training.fema.gov/EMIWeb/IS/
is700.asp.
• Formally recognize the NIMS and
adopt NIMS principles and policies.
Districts and/or their local government
should establish an executive order,
resolution, or ordinance to formally
adopt the NIMS.
• Establish a NIMS baseline to
determine which NIMS requirements
have been met by the LEA. Districts
should coordinate with their
community partners to assess the
district’s overall compliance with the
NIMS, and determine gaps in
compliance that need to be closed in
order to reach full implementation of
the NIMS.
• Establish a timeframe and strategy
for full NIMS implementation. States,
territories, tribes, and local entities are
encouraged to achieve full NIMS
implementation by September 30, 2005,
to the maximum extent possible.
• Establish the use of the Incident
Command System (ICS). The ICS has
been established by the NIMS as the
standardized incident organizational
structure for the management of all
incidents. Districts should coordinate
with community partners listed above
in institutionalizing the use of the ICS
VerDate jul<14>2003
19:36 Apr 13, 2005
Jkt 205001
in a manner that is consistent with the
concepts and principles in the NIMS.
Note: Since LEAs are integral to local
governments, an LEA’s NIMS compliance
must be achieved in close coordination with
the local government and with recognition of
the first responder capabilities held by the
LEA and the local government. As LEAs are
not traditional response organizations, first
responder services will typically be provided
to LEAs by local fire and rescue departments,
emergency medical service providers, and
law enforcement agencies. This traditional
relationship must be acknowledged in
achieving NIMS compliance in an integrated
NIMS compliance plan for the local
government and the LEA. LEA participation
in the NIMS preparedness program of the
local government is essential to ensure that
first responder services are delivered to
schools in a timely and effective manner.
Additional information about NIMS
implementation is available at https://
www.fema.gov/nims.)
4. Individuals with Disabilities. The
applicant’s plan must demonstrate that
the applicant has taken into
consideration the communication,
transportation, and medical needs of
individuals with disabilities within the
school district.
Executive Order 12866
This notice of proposed priority and
other application requirements has been
reviewed in accordance with Executive
Order 12866. Under the terms of the
order, we have assessed the potential
costs and benefits of this regulatory
action.
The potential costs associated with
the notice of proposed priority and
other application requirements are those
resulting from statutory requirements
and those we have determined as
necessary for administering this
program effectively and efficiently.
In assessing the potential costs and
benefits—both quantitative and
qualitative—of this notice of proposed
priority and other application
requirements, we have determined that
the benefits of the proposed priority and
other application requirements justify
the costs.
We have also determined that this
regulatory action does not unduly
interfere with State, local, and tribal
governments in the exercise of their
governmental functions.
Summary of potential costs and
benefits: The potential cost associated
with this proposed priority and other
application requirements is minimal
while the benefits are significant.
Grantees may anticipate costs with
completing the application process in
terms of staff and partner time, copying,
and mailing or delivery. The use of E-
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Application technology reduces mailing
and copying costs significantly.
Grantees may also anticipate costs in
achieving NIMS compliance. However,
these costs may be included in the grant
budget and, therefore, will have little
financial impact on the applicant.
The benefit of this proposed priority
and other application requirements is
that grantees that develop a
comprehensive emergency response and
crisis management plan that includes
training and that is implemented in
coordination with community partners
may mitigate the financial and human
impact of a crisis in their district.
Intergovernmental Review
This program is subject to Executive
Order 12372 and the regulations in 34
CFR part 79. One of the objectives of the
Executive order is to foster an
intergovernmental partnership and a
strengthened federalism. The Executive
order relies on processes developed by
State and local governments for
coordination and review of proposed
Federal financial assistance.
This document provides early
notification of our specific plans and
actions for this program.
Electronic Access to This Document
You may view this document, as well
as all other Department of Education
documents published in the Federal
Register, in text or Adobe Portable
Document Format (PDF) on the Internet
at the following site: https://www.ed.gov/
news/fedregister.
To use PDF you must have Adobe
Acrobat Reader, which is available free
at this site. If you have questions about
PDF, call the U.S. Government Printing
Office (GPO), toll free, at 1–888–293–
6498; or in the Washington, DC, area, at
(202) 512–1530.
Note: The official version of this document
is the document published in the Federal
Register. Free Internet access to the official
edition of the Federal Register and the Code
of Federal Regulations is available on GPO
Access at: https://www.gpoaccess.gov/nara/
index.html.
(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
Number 84.184.E—Emergency Response and
Crisis Management Grant program)
Program Authority: 20 U.S.C. 7131.
Dated: April 11, 2005.
Deborah A. Price,
Assistant Deputy Secretary for Safe and DrugFree Schools.
[FR Doc. 05–7531 Filed 4–13–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000–01–P
E:\FR\FM\14APN1.SGM
14APN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 71 (Thursday, April 14, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 19736-19738]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-7531]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Emergency Response and Crisis Management Grant Program
AGENCY: Office of Safe and Drug-Free Schools, Department of Education.
ACTION: Notice of proposed priority and other application requirements.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We propose a priority and other application requirements under
the Emergency Response and Crisis Management Grant program. We may use
this priority and the application requirements for competitions in
Fiscal Year (FY) 2005 and in later years. We take this action to focus
Federal financial assistance on supporting grants to local educational
agencies (LEAs) in improving and strengthening emergency response and
crisis management plans that address the four phases of crisis
planning: Prevention/Mitigation, Preparedness, Response, and Recovery.
DATES: We must receive your comments on or before May 16, 2005.
ADDRESSES: Address all comments about this proposed priority and other
application requirements to Sara Strizzi, 400 Maryland Avenue, SW.,
room 3E320, Washington, DC 20202-6450. If you prefer to send your
comments
[[Page 19737]]
through the Internet, use the following address: sara.strizzi@ed.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sara Strizzi. Telephone: (202) 708-
4850 or via Internet: sara.strizzi@ed.gov.
If you use a telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD), you may
call the Federal Relay Service (FRS) at 1-888-877-8339.
Individuals with disabilities may obtain this document in an
alternative format (e.g. Braille, large print, audiotape, or computer
diskette) on request to the contact person listed under FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Invitation To Comment
We invite you to submit comments regarding this proposed priority
and other application requirements.
We invite you to assist us in complying with the specific
requirements of Executive Order 12866 and its overall requirement of
reducing regulatory burden that might result from this proposed
priority and other application requirements. Please let us know of any
further opportunities we should take to reduce potential costs or
increase potential benefits while preserving the effective and
efficient administration of the program.
During and after the comment period, you may inspect all public
comments about this proposed priority and other application
requirements in 400 Maryland Ave, SW., room 3E320, Washington, DC,
between the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 4 p.m., eastern time, Monday through
Friday of each week except Federal holidays.
Assistance to Individuals With Disabilities in Reviewing the Rulemaking
Record
On request, we will supply an appropriate aid, such as a reader or
print magnifier, to an individual with a disability who needs
assistance to review the comments or other documents in the public
rulemaking record for this proposed priority and other application
requirements. If you want to schedule an appointment for this type of
aid, please contact the person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT.
Background: The events of September 11, 2001, made schools and
communities aware that, in addition to planning for traditional crises
and emergencies, schools must now plan to respond to possible terrorist
attacks on campus or in the community. We propose this priority and
other application requirements under the Safe and Drug-Free Schools and
Communities National Programs to focus on the important need of LEAs to
strengthen and improve school crisis plans in coordination with
community-based partners.
We will announce the final priority and other application
requirements in a notice in the Federal Register. We will determine the
final priority and other application requirements after considering
responses to this notice and other information available to the
Department. This notice does not preclude us from proposing or using
additional priorities or other application requirements, subject to
meeting applicable rulemaking requirements.
Note: This notice does not solicit applications. In any year in
which we choose to use this proposed priority and other application
requirements, we invite applications through a notice in the Federal
Register. When inviting applications we designate the priority as
absolute, competitive preference, or invitational. The effect of
each type of priority follows:
Absolute priority: Under an absolute priority we consider only
applications that meet the priority (34 CFR 75.105(c)(3)).
Competitive preference priority: Under a competitive preference
priority we give competitive preference to an application by either (1)
awarding additional points, depending on how well or the extent to
which the application meets the competitive priority (34 CFR
75.105(c)(2)(i)); or (2) selecting an application that meets the
competitive priority over an application of comparable merit that does
not meet the priority (34 CFR 75.105(c)(2)(ii)).
Invitational priority: Under an invitational priority we are
particularly interested in applications that meet the invitational
priority. However, we do not give an application that meets the
invitational priority a competitive or absolute preference over other
applications (34 CFR 75.105(c)(1)).
Priority: Improvement and Strengthening of School Emergency
Response and Crisis Management Plans. This proposed priority supports
local educational agency (LEA) projects to improve and strengthen
emergency response and crisis management plans, at the district and
school-building level, addressing the four phases of crisis planning:
Prevention/Mitigation, Preparedness, Response, and Recovery. Plans must
include: (1) training for school personnel and students in emergency
response procedures; (2) coordination with local law enforcement,
public safety, health, and mental health agencies; and (3) a method for
communicating school emergency response policies and reunification
procedures to parents and guardians.
Other Application Requirements: We propose establishing the
following application requirements:
1. Partner Agreements. To be considered for a grant award, an
applicant must include in its application an agreement that details the
participation of each of the following five community-based partners:
law enforcement, public safety, health, mental health, and the head of
the applicant's local government (for example the mayor, city manager,
or county executive). The agreement must include a description of each
partner's roles and responsibilities in improving and strengthening
emergency response plans at the district and school-building level, a
description of each partner's commitment to the continuation and
continuous improvement of emergency response plans at the district and
school-building level, and an authorized signature representing the LEA
and each partner acknowledging the agreement. If one or more of the
five partners listed is not present in the applicant's community, or
cannot feasibly participate, the agreement must explain the absence of
each missing partner. To be considered eligible for funding, however,
an application must include a signed agreement between the LEA, a law
enforcement partner, and at least one of the other required partners
(public safety, health, mental health, or head of local government).
Applications that fail to include the required agreement, including
information on partners' roles and responsibilities and on their
commitment to continuation and continuous improvement (with signatures
and explanations for missing signatures as specified above), will not
be read.
Although this program requires partnerships with other parties,
administrative direction and fiscal control for the project must reside
with the LEA.
2. Coordination with State or Local Homeland Security Plan. All
emergency response and crisis management plans must be coordinated with
the Homeland Security Plan of the State or locality in which the LEA is
located. All States submitted such a plan to the Department of Homeland
Security on January 30, 2004. To ensure that emergency services are
coordinated, and to avoid duplication of effort within States and
localities, applicants must include in their applications an assurance
that the LEA will coordinate with and follow the requirements of
[[Page 19738]]
their State or local Homeland Security Plan for emergency services and
initiatives.
3. Support of the National Incident Management System. Applicants
also must also agree to support the implementation of the National
Incident Management System (NIMS). In accordance with Homeland Security
Presidential Directive/HSPD-5, the NIMS provides a consistent approach
for Federal, State, and local governments to work effectively and
efficiently together to prepare for, prevent, respond to, and recover
from domestic incidents, regardless of cause, size, or complexity.
Specifically, applicants must include in their applications an
assurance that, by September 30, 2005, they will complete, to the
maximum extent possible, the following steps to support NIMS
implementation:
Administer the NIMS Awareness Course: ``National Incident
Management System (NIMS), An Introduction'' (IS 700) to key district
and school staff. This independent study course, developed by the
Emergency Management Institute (EMI), explains the purpose, principles,
key components, and benefits of the NIMS. The course is available
online and will take between forty-five minutes to three hours to
complete. The course is available on the EMI Web site at: https://
training.fema.gov/EMIWeb/IS/is700.asp.
Formally recognize the NIMS and adopt NIMS principles and
policies. Districts and/or their local government should establish an
executive order, resolution, or ordinance to formally adopt the NIMS.
Establish a NIMS baseline to determine which NIMS
requirements have been met by the LEA. Districts should coordinate with
their community partners to assess the district's overall compliance
with the NIMS, and determine gaps in compliance that need to be closed
in order to reach full implementation of the NIMS.
Establish a timeframe and strategy for full NIMS
implementation. States, territories, tribes, and local entities are
encouraged to achieve full NIMS implementation by September 30, 2005,
to the maximum extent possible.
Establish the use of the Incident Command System (ICS).
The ICS has been established by the NIMS as the standardized incident
organizational structure for the management of all incidents. Districts
should coordinate with community partners listed above in
institutionalizing the use of the ICS in a manner that is consistent
with the concepts and principles in the NIMS.
Note: Since LEAs are integral to local governments, an LEA's
NIMS compliance must be achieved in close coordination with the
local government and with recognition of the first responder
capabilities held by the LEA and the local government. As LEAs are
not traditional response organizations, first responder services
will typically be provided to LEAs by local fire and rescue
departments, emergency medical service providers, and law
enforcement agencies. This traditional relationship must be
acknowledged in achieving NIMS compliance in an integrated NIMS
compliance plan for the local government and the LEA. LEA
participation in the NIMS preparedness program of the local
government is essential to ensure that first responder services are
delivered to schools in a timely and effective manner. Additional
information about NIMS implementation is available at https://
www.fema.gov/nims.)
4. Individuals with Disabilities. The applicant's plan must
demonstrate that the applicant has taken into consideration the
communication, transportation, and medical needs of individuals with
disabilities within the school district.
Executive Order 12866
This notice of proposed priority and other application requirements
has been reviewed in accordance with Executive Order 12866. Under the
terms of the order, we have assessed the potential costs and benefits
of this regulatory action.
The potential costs associated with the notice of proposed priority
and other application requirements are those resulting from statutory
requirements and those we have determined as necessary for
administering this program effectively and efficiently.
In assessing the potential costs and benefits--both quantitative
and qualitative--of this notice of proposed priority and other
application requirements, we have determined that the benefits of the
proposed priority and other application requirements justify the costs.
We have also determined that this regulatory action does not unduly
interfere with State, local, and tribal governments in the exercise of
their governmental functions.
Summary of potential costs and benefits: The potential cost
associated with this proposed priority and other application
requirements is minimal while the benefits are significant. Grantees
may anticipate costs with completing the application process in terms
of staff and partner time, copying, and mailing or delivery. The use of
E-Application technology reduces mailing and copying costs
significantly.
Grantees may also anticipate costs in achieving NIMS compliance.
However, these costs may be included in the grant budget and,
therefore, will have little financial impact on the applicant.
The benefit of this proposed priority and other application
requirements is that grantees that develop a comprehensive emergency
response and crisis management plan that includes training and that is
implemented in coordination with community partners may mitigate the
financial and human impact of a crisis in their district.
Intergovernmental Review
This program is subject to Executive Order 12372 and the
regulations in 34 CFR part 79. One of the objectives of the Executive
order is to foster an intergovernmental partnership and a strengthened
federalism. The Executive order relies on processes developed by State
and local governments for coordination and review of proposed Federal
financial assistance.
This document provides early notification of our specific plans and
actions for this program.
Electronic Access to This Document
You may view this document, as well as all other Department of
Education documents published in the Federal Register, in text or Adobe
Portable Document Format (PDF) on the Internet at the following site:
https://www.ed.gov/news/fedregister.
To use PDF you must have Adobe Acrobat Reader, which is available
free at this site. If you have questions about PDF, call the U.S.
Government Printing Office (GPO), toll free, at 1-888-293-6498; or in
the Washington, DC, area, at (202) 512-1530.
Note: The official version of this document is the document
published in the Federal Register. Free Internet access to the
official edition of the Federal Register and the Code of Federal
Regulations is available on GPO Access at: https://www.gpoaccess.gov/
nara/.
(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 84.184.E--Emergency
Response and Crisis Management Grant program)
Program Authority: 20 U.S.C. 7131.
Dated: April 11, 2005.
Deborah A. Price,
Assistant Deputy Secretary for Safe and Drug-Free Schools.
[FR Doc. 05-7531 Filed 4-13-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000-01-P