In the Matter of Certain Disc Drives, Components Thereof, and Products Containing Same; Notice of a Commission Determination Not To Review an Initial Determination Granting a Motion To Amend the Notice of Investigation, 19782 [05-7500]

Download as PDF 19782 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 71 / Thursday, April 14, 2005 / Notices Description of Respondents: Applicants for coal mining permits. Total Annual Responses: One new permit and 75 revisions annually. Total Annual Burden Hours: 500 hours for new permits annually. 900 hours for permit revisions annually. Total Annual Non-wage Costs: $15,000 for filings fees annually for new permits. Title: Rights of Entry—30 CFR Part 877. OMB Control Number: 1029–0055. Summary: This regulation establishes procedures for non-consensual entry upon private lands for the purpose of abandoned mine land reclamation activities or exploratory studies when the landowner refuses consent or is not available. Bureau Form Number: None. Frequency of Collection: Once. Description of Respondents: State abandoned mine land reclamation agencies. Total Annual Responses: 103. Total Annual Burden Hours: 103. Total Annual Non-wage Costs: $4,120 for publication costs. Send comments on the need for the collections of information for the performance of the functions of the agency; the accuracy of the agency’s burden estimates; ways to enhance the quality, utility and clarity of the information collections; and ways to minimize the information collection burdens on respondents, such as use of automated means of collections of the information, to the following addresses. Please refer to the appropriate OMB control numbers in all correspondence. Dated: April 8, 2005. John R. Craynon, Chief, Division of Regulatory Support. [FR Doc. 05–7499 Filed 4–13–05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4310–05–M INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation No. 337–TA–516] In the Matter of Certain Disc Drives, Components Thereof, and Products Containing Same; Notice of a Commission Determination Not To Review an Initial Determination Granting a Motion To Amend the Notice of Investigation U.S. International Trade Commission. ACTION: Notice. AGENCY: SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission has determined not to VerDate jul<14>2003 19:36 Apr 13, 2005 Jkt 205001 review the presiding administrative law judge’s (‘‘ALJ’s’’) initial determination (‘‘ID’’) granting complainants’ motion to amend the notice of investigation in the above-captioned investigation to add claims 2–4 and 23–26 and to remove claims 5–7 and 28–31 from one of the asserted patents at issue in the investigation, U.S. Patent No. 5,600,506. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Timothy P. Monaghan, Esq., Office of the General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone 202– 205–3152. Copies of the ID and all nonconfidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are or will be available for inspection during official business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone 202–205–2000. Hearingimpaired persons are advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202– 205–1810. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server (https://www.usitc.gov). The public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission instituted this investigation on August 5, 2004, based on a complaint filed on behalf of Seagate Technology, LLC (‘‘Seagate’’). 69 FR 47460 (Aug. 5, 2004). The complaint, as supplemented, alleged violations of section 337 in the importation into the United States, sale for importation, and sale within the United States after importation of certain disc drives, components thereof, and products containing same by reason of infringement of certain claims of seven U.S. patents, including U.S. Patent Nos. 6,744,606 (‘‘the ‘606 patent’’); 5,596,461 (‘‘the ‘461 patent’’); and 5,600,506 (‘‘the ‘506 patent’’). The notice of investigation named Cornice, Inc. (‘‘Cornice’’) of Longmont, Colorado as the sole respondent. On December 28, 2004, the ALJ issued Order No. 6, an ID granting in part a motion for summary determination of invalidity of the asserted claims of the ‘606 patent. On January 28, 2005, the Commission determined to review and reverse Order No. 6. On March 7, 2005, the ALJ issued Order No. 8 granting Cornice’s motion for summary determination of noninfringement of the ‘461 patent, and denying Seagate’s cross-motion for summary determination of infringement of the ‘461 patent. No petitions for PO 00000 Frm 00056 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 review of Order No. 8 were filed, and on March 29, 2005, the Commission determined not to review the ID. On February 24, 2005, complainant Seagate moved to amend the notice of investigation. Seagate requested that the notice of investigation be amended to add claims 2–4 and 23–26 of the ‘506 patent, and to remove claims 5–7 and 28–31 of the ‘506 patent. On March 21, 2005, the ALJ issued the subject ID, Order No. 10, granting complainants’ motion to amend the notice of the investigation. No party filed a petition to review the subject ID. This action is taken under the authority of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, 19 U.S.C. 1337, and section 210.42 of Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.42. By order of the Commission. Issued: April 11, 2005. Marilyn R. Abbott, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. 05–7500 Filed 4–13–05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Notice of Lodging of Consent Decree Under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (‘‘CERCLA’’) Consistent with Section 122(i) of CERCLA, 42 U.S.C. 9622(i), and 28 CFR 50.7, a Partial Consent Decree with Lucent Technologies, Inc., was lodged with the United States District Court for the Middle District of Georgia on March 23, 2005, in the matter of United States v. American Cyanamid, et al., No. 1:02– CV–109–1 (M.D. Ga.) (Docket No. 141). In that action, the United States seeks to recover from various Defendants, pursuant to Sections 107 and 113(b)(2) of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980, as amended, (‘‘CERCLA’’), 42 U.S.C. 9607 and 9613(g)(2), the costs incurred and to be incurred by the United States in responding to the release and/or threatened release of hazardous substances at and from the Stoller Chemical Company/Pelham Site (‘‘Site’’) in Pelham, Mitchell County, Georgia. Under the proposed Partial Consent Decree, Defendant Lucent Technologies, Inc., will pay $70,000 to the Hazardous Substances Superfund in reimbursement of the costs incurred by the United States at the Site. The Department of Justice will receive for a period of thirty (30) days from the date of this publication comments relating to the Consent Decree. Comments should E:\FR\FM\14APN1.SGM 14APN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 71 (Thursday, April 14, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 19782]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-7500]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Investigation No. 337-TA-516]


In the Matter of Certain Disc Drives, Components Thereof, and 
Products Containing Same; Notice of a Commission Determination Not To 
Review an Initial Determination Granting a Motion To Amend the Notice 
of Investigation

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade 
Commission has determined not to review the presiding administrative 
law judge's (``ALJ's'') initial determination (``ID'') granting 
complainants' motion to amend the notice of investigation in the above-
captioned investigation to add claims 2-4 and 23-26 and to remove 
claims 5-7 and 28-31 from one of the asserted patents at issue in the 
investigation, U.S. Patent No. 5,600,506.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Timothy P. Monaghan, Esq., Office of 
the General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, 
SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone 202-205-3152. Copies of the ID and 
all nonconfidential documents filed in connection with this 
investigation are or will be available for inspection during official 
business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, 
U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 
20436, telephone 202-205-2000. Hearing-impaired persons are advised 
that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the 
Commission's TDD terminal on 202-205-1810. General information 
concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its 
Internet server (https://www.usitc.gov). The public record for this 
investigation may be viewed on the Commission's electronic docket 
(EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission instituted this investigation 
on August 5, 2004, based on a complaint filed on behalf of Seagate 
Technology, LLC (``Seagate''). 69 FR 47460 (Aug. 5, 2004). The 
complaint, as supplemented, alleged violations of section 337 in the 
importation into the United States, sale for importation, and sale 
within the United States after importation of certain disc drives, 
components thereof, and products containing same by reason of 
infringement of certain claims of seven U.S. patents, including U.S. 
Patent Nos. 6,744,606 (``the `606 patent''); 5,596,461 (``the `461 
patent''); and 5,600,506 (``the `506 patent''). The notice of 
investigation named Cornice, Inc. (``Cornice'') of Longmont, Colorado 
as the sole respondent.
    On December 28, 2004, the ALJ issued Order No. 6, an ID granting in 
part a motion for summary determination of invalidity of the asserted 
claims of the `606 patent. On January 28, 2005, the Commission 
determined to review and reverse Order No. 6.
    On March 7, 2005, the ALJ issued Order No. 8 granting Cornice's 
motion for summary determination of noninfringement of the `461 patent, 
and denying Seagate's cross-motion for summary determination of 
infringement of the `461 patent. No petitions for review of Order No. 8 
were filed, and on March 29, 2005, the Commission determined not to 
review the ID.
    On February 24, 2005, complainant Seagate moved to amend the notice 
of investigation. Seagate requested that the notice of investigation be 
amended to add claims 2-4 and 23-26 of the `506 patent, and to remove 
claims 5-7 and 28-31 of the `506 patent.
    On March 21, 2005, the ALJ issued the subject ID, Order No. 10, 
granting complainants' motion to amend the notice of the investigation. 
No party filed a petition to review the subject ID.
    This action is taken under the authority of section 337 of the 
Tariff Act of 1930, 19 U.S.C. 1337, and section 210.42 of Rules of 
Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.42.

    By order of the Commission.

    Issued: April 11, 2005.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 05-7500 Filed 4-13-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.