Self-Regulatory Organizations; Notice of Filing of Proposed Rule Change and Amendment Nos. 1 and 2 Thereto by the Chicago Stock Exchange, Inc. To Clarify That Specialists May Not Charge Commissions With Respect to the Execution of CHXpress Orders, 17743-17745 [E5-1584]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 66 / Thursday, April 7, 2005 / Notices capped at $2,000 per dividend spread transaction.6 CBOE defines a dividend spread as any trade done to achieve a dividend arbitrage between any two deep-in-the-money options. This program is similar to fee cap programs adopted by other exchanges.7 The Exchange proposes to amend its Fee Schedule to enhance its dividend spread fee cap program. Specifically, the Exchange proposes to cap marketmaker, firm, and broker-dealer transaction fees at $2,000 for all dividend spread transactions executed on the same trading day in the same options class. The Exchange proposes to implement the enhanced fee cap program as a pilot program that will expire on September 1, 2005. The Exchange believes that enhancing the fee cap to accommodate these transactions will attract additional liquidity. As is done under the current program, the Exchange will rebate transaction fees for qualifying transactions. Members who wish to benefit from the fee cap will be required to submit to the Exchange a rebate request form with supporting documentation (e.g., clearing firm transaction data). In addition, the Exchange proposes to update the Fee Schedule in various places to reflect the symbol change, from QQQ to QQQQ, that accompanied the transfer of the listing of the Nasdaq– 100 Index Tracking Stock from the American Stock Exchange to the Nasdaq Stock Market. 2. Statutory Basis The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change, as amended, is consistent with section 6(b) of the Act8, in general, and furthers the objectives of section 6(b)(4) of the Act,9 in particular, in that it is designed to provide for the equitable allocation of reasonable dues, fees, and other charges among CBOE members and other persons using its facilities. B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement on Burden on Competition CBOE does not believe that the proposed rule change, as amended, will impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of purposes of the Act. 6 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 50175 (August 10, 2004), 69 FR 51129 (August 17, 2004) (SR–CBOE–2004–38). 7 See Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 48363 (August 19, 2003), 68 FR 51625 (August 27, 2003) (SR–PCX–2003–39); 48983 (December 23, 2003), 68 FR 75703 (December 31, 2003) (SR–Phlx–2003–80); and 49358 (March 3, 2004), 69 FR 11469 (March 10, 2004) (SR–Amex–2004–09). 8 15 U.S.C. 78f(b). 9 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4). VerDate jul<14>2003 18:22 Apr 06, 2005 Jkt 205001 C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement on Comments on the Proposed Rule Change Received From Members, Participants or Others No written comments were solicited or received with respect to the proposed rule change, as amended. III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for Commission Action The foregoing rule change has become effective pursuant to section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act10 and subparagraph (f)(2) of Rule 19b–4 thereunder11 because it establishes or changes a due, fee, or other charge imposed by the Exchange. At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule change, the Commission may summarily abrogate such rule change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.12 IV. Solicitation of Comments Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views and arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of the following methods: Electronic Comments • Use the Commission’s Internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/ rules/sro.shtml); or • Send an e-mail to rulecomments@sec.gov. Please include File Number SR–CBOE–2005–18 on the subject line. Paper Comments • Send paper comments in triplicate to Jonathan G. Katz, Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 450 Fifth Street, NW., Washington, DC 20549–0609. All submissions should refer to File Number SR–CBOE–2005–18. This file number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used. To help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on the Commission’s Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/ U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A). CFR 240.19b–4(f)(2). 12 For purposes of calculating the 60-day period within which the Commission may summarily abrogate the proposed rule change under section 19(b)(3)(C) of the Act, the Commission considers that period to have commenced on March 17, 2005, the date the Exchange filed Amendment No. 1 to the proposed rule change. See 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(C) PO 00000 10 15 11 17 Frm 00100 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 17743 rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for inspection and copying in the Commission’s Public Reference Room. Copies of such filing also will be available for inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions should refer to File Number SR–CBOE–2005–18 and should be submitted on or before April 28, 2005. For the Commission, by the Division of Market Regulation, pursuant to delegated authority.13 Jill M. Peterson, Assistant Secretary. [FR Doc. E5–1600 Filed 4–6–05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8010–01–P SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION [Release No. 34–51465; File No. SR–CHX– 2005–04] Self-Regulatory Organizations; Notice of Filing of Proposed Rule Change and Amendment Nos. 1 and 2 Thereto by the Chicago Stock Exchange, Inc. To Clarify That Specialists May Not Charge Commissions With Respect to the Execution of CHXpress Orders April 1, 2005. Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2 notice is hereby given that on March 1, 2005, the Chicago Stock Exchange, Inc. (‘‘CHX’’ or ‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II and III below, which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. On March 21, 2005, the Exchange filed Amendment No. 1 to 13 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12). U.S.C. 78s(b)(1). 2 17 CFR 240.19b–4. 1 15 E:\FR\FM\07APN1.SGM 07APN1 17744 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 66 / Thursday, April 7, 2005 / Notices the proposed rule change.3 On March 30, 2005, the Exchange filed Amendment No. 2 to the proposed rule change.4 The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change, as amended, from interested persons. I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement of the Terms of Substance of the Proposed Rule Change The Exchange proposes to amend its rules to clarify that a specialist is not permitted to charge a commission on the execution of CHXpressTM orders. The text of the proposed rule change is included below. Italics indicate new text; brackets indicate deletions. ARTICLE XX Regular Trading Sessions * * * * * Guaranteed Execution System and Midwest Automated Execution System Rule 37. (a) No change to text. (b) No change to text. (1)–(10) No change to text. (11) CHXpress Orders. This section applies to the execution and display of orders through CHXpress, an automated functionality offered by the Exchange. All other rules of the Exchange are applicable, unless expressly superseded by this section. * * * * * (H) A CHX specialist may not charge a commission for execution of a CHXpress order. * * * * * ARTICLE XXX Specialists * * * * * Precedence to Orders in Book RULE 2. The specialist, co-specialist and relief specialist shall at all times give precedence to orders in the book for purchase or sale of securities over the orders which originate with him or it as a dealer, provided, his or its orders and those of his or its customer are market orders, or limited orders at the same price. Notwithstanding the foregoing, whenever a specialist, cospecialist or relief specialist elects to accept a professional order for the book which is not required to be accepted by such specialist, co-specialist or relief specialist pursuant to the rules and 3 See Form 19b–4, dated March 20, 2005 (‘‘Amendment No. 1’’), which replaced the original filing in its entirety. 4 See Form 19b–4, dated March 30, 2005 (‘‘Amendment No. 2’’), which corrected an inadvertent reference to filing pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) instead of Section 19(b)(2). VerDate jul<14>2003 18:22 Apr 06, 2005 Jkt 205001 polices of the Exchange, such specialist, co-specialist or relief specialist is not required to relinquish precedence to such order over the orders which originate with him or it as dealer, provided (a) his or its orders and those of his or its customer are limited orders at the same price and (b) the specialist, co-specialist or relief specialist is displaying his or its order, including its size, through the quotation system. [No specialist, co-specialist or relief specialist may charge a Participant a commission in any transaction in which he or it is a principal.] * * * Interpretations and Policies .005 No specialist, co-specialist or relief specialist may charge a Participant a commission in any transaction in which such specialist, cospecialist or relief specialist is a principal, or for execution of any CHXpress order. * * * * * II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in Sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such statements. A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change 1. Purpose The Exchange is rolling out a new, automated functionality for the handling of CHXpress orders. According to the Exchange, the CHXpress functionality is designed to provide additional opportunities for the Exchange’s participants to seek and receive liquidity through automated executions of orders at the Exchange.5 With a few exceptions, CHXpress orders will be executed immediately and automatically against same or betterpriced orders in the specialist’s book, or against the specialist’s quote (when CHXpress is available).6 If a CHXpress 5 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 50481 (Sept. 30, 2004); 69 FR 60197 (Oct. 7, 2004) (SR– CHX–2004–12). 6 If the execution of a CHXpress order would cause an improper trade-through of another ITS PO 00000 Frm 00101 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 order cannot be immediately executed, it will be placed in the specialist’s book for display or later execution.7 A CHX specialist may not cancel or place a CHXpress order on hold or otherwise prevent the order-sending firm from canceling the order. In addition, CHX specialists do not provide CHXpress orders with the execution guarantees that might otherwise be available to agency limit orders.8 Specifically, these orders are not eligible for automated price improvement, or execution based on quotes in the national market system or prints in the primary market for a security. CHX specialists also would not be required to seek liquidity for CHXpress orders in other markets. Through this filing, the Exchange seeks to clarify that a CHX specialist would not be permitted to charge a commission in connection with the execution of a CHXpress order. The Exchange believes that this clarification is appropriate for several reasons. First, as noted above, the handling of these orders within the Exchange’s systems is entirely automatic—orders can execute automatically and be displayed automatically. Moreover, CHX specialists would not provide CHXpress orders with the execution guarantees that might otherwise be available to agency limit orders. Specifically, these orders would not be eligible for automated price improvement, or execution based on quotes in the national market system or prints in the primary market for a security. A CHX specialist also would not act as agent for the orders in other markets. 2. Statutory Basis The Exchange believes the proposal is consistent with the requirements of the Act and the rules and regulations thereunder that are applicable to a national securities exchange, and, in particular, with the requirements of Section 6(b) of the Act.9 The Exchange believes the proposal is consistent with Section 6(b)(5) of the Act,10 in that the market, the CHXpress order would be automatically cancelled. If trading in an issue has been halted, all CHXpress orders in that issue would be automatically cancelled. See CHX Article XX, Rule 37(b)(11)(C). 7 A CHXpress order will be instantaneously and automatically displayed when it constitutes the best bid or offer in the CHX book. See CHX Article XX, Rule 37(b)(11)(D). CHXpress orders, like all other orders at the Exchange, will not be eligible for automated display if that display would improperly lock or cross another ITS market. A CHXpress order that would improperly lock or cross the NBBO will be cancelled. Because CHXpress orders will be automatically displayed, there is no mechanism to allow them to be excluded from the CHX’s quote. 8 See CHX Article XX, Rule 37(b)(11)(E)–(F). 9 15 U.S.C. 78f(b). 10 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5). E:\FR\FM\07APN1.SGM 07APN1 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 66 / Thursday, April 7, 2005 / Notices proposal is designed to promote just and equitable principles of trade, to remove impediments, and to perfect the mechanism of, a free and open market and a national market system, and, in general, to protect investors and the public interest. B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement on Burden on Competition The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will impose any inappropriate burden on competition. C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement on Comments on the Proposed Rule Change Received From Members, Participants or Others The Exchange has neither solicited nor received written comments on the proposed rule change. III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for Commission Action Within 35 days of the date of publication of this notice in the Federal Register or within such longer period (i) as the Commission may designate up to 90 days of such date if it finds such longer period to be appropriate and publishes its reasons for so finding or (ii) as to which the Exchange consents, the Commission will: (A) By order approve the proposed rule change, or (B) Institute proceedings to determine whether the proposed rule change should be disapproved. IV. Solicitation of Comments Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule change, as amended, is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of the following methods: Electronic Comments • Use the Commission’s Internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/ rules/sro.shtml); or • Send an e-mail to rulecomments@sec.gov. Please include File Number SR–CHX–2005–04 on the subject line. Paper Comments • Send paper comments in triplicate to Jonathan G. Katz, Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 450 Fifth Street, NW., Washington, DC 20549–0609. All submissions should refer to File Number SR–CHX–2005–04. This file number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used. To help the VerDate jul<14>2003 18:22 Apr 06, 2005 Jkt 205001 Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on the Commission’s Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/ rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for inspection and copying in the Commission’s Public Reference Room. Copies of the filing also will be available for inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions should refer to File Number SR–CHX–2005–04 and should be submitted on or before April 28, 2005. For the Commission, by the Division of Market Regulation, pursuant to delegated authority.11 Margaret H. McFarland, Deputy Secretary. [FR Doc. E5–1584 Filed 4–6–05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8010–01–P SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION [Release No. 34–51456: File No. SR–NSX– 2004–07] Self-Regulatory Organizations; National Stock Exchange; Order Approving Proposed Rule Change Relating to Non-Member Give-Ups March 31, 2005. On August 31, 2004, the National Stock ExchangeSM (‘‘NSXSM’’) submitted to the Securities and Exchange Commission (‘‘Commission’’), pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2 a proposed rule change relating to nonmember give-ups. On December 3, 2004, the NSXSM filed Amendment No. 1 to the proposed rule change. The Commission published the proposed rule change, as amended for comment in PO 00000 11 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12). U.S.C. 78s(b)(1). 2 17 CFR 240.19b–4. 1 15 Frm 00102 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 17745 the Federal Register on December 29, 2004.3 The Commission did not receive any comments on the proposed rule change. After careful consideration, the Commission finds that the proposed rule change is consistent with the requirements of the Act and the rules and regulations thereunder that are applicable to a national securities exchange.4 In particular, the Commission finds that the proposed rule change is consistent with Section 6(b)(5) of the Act,5 which requires, among other things, that the rules of the NSXSM be designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices, to promote just and equitable principles of trade, and, in general, to protect investors and the public interest. The Commission believes that permitting NSXSM members to give-up non-NSXSM members’ clearing numbers for purposes of clearing and settling trades should add transparency to trading on the NSXSM and should eliminate unnecessary steps in clearing and settling these trades. The proposed rule requires that the NSXSM member clearing firm accept financial responsibility for all transactions with non-members. It further requires nonmembers to enter into a contract consenting to the disciplinary jurisdiction of the NSXSM. This requirement should provide an adequate level of control by the NSXSM over nonmembers engaging in transactions on the NSXSM. It is therefore ordered, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the Act,6 that the proposed rule change (SR–NSX–20004– 07) be, and it hereby is, approved. For the Commission, by the Division of Market Regulation, pursuant to delegated authority.7 Margaret H. McFarland, Deputy Secretary. [FR Doc. E5–1579 Filed 4–6–05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8010–01–P 3 Securities Exchange Act Release No. 50898 (December 21, 2004), 69 FR 78028. 4 In approving the proposed rule change, the Commission notes that it has considered the proposed rule’s impact on efficiency, competition, and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C. 78c(f). 5 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5). 6 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2). 7 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12). E:\FR\FM\07APN1.SGM 07APN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 66 (Thursday, April 7, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 17743-17745]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E5-1584]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-51465; File No. SR-CHX-2005-04]


Self-Regulatory Organizations; Notice of Filing of Proposed Rule 
Change and Amendment Nos. 1 and 2 Thereto by the Chicago Stock 
Exchange, Inc. To Clarify That Specialists May Not Charge Commissions 
With Respect to the Execution of CHXpress Orders

April 1, 2005.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 
(``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that 
on March 1, 2005, the Chicago Stock Exchange, Inc. (``CHX'' or 
``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission 
(``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II 
and III below, which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. On March 
21, 2005, the Exchange filed Amendment No. 1 to

[[Page 17744]]

the proposed rule change.\3\ On March 30, 2005, the Exchange filed 
Amendment No. 2 to the proposed rule change.\4\ The Commission is 
publishing this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change, 
as amended, from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ See Form 19b-4, dated March 20, 2005 (``Amendment No. 1''), 
which replaced the original filing in its entirety.
    \4\ See Form 19b-4, dated March 30, 2005 (``Amendment No. 2''), 
which corrected an inadvertent reference to filing pursuant to 
Section 19(b)(3)(A) instead of Section 19(b)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance 
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange proposes to amend its rules to clarify that a 
specialist is not permitted to charge a commission on the execution of 
CHXpressTM orders. The text of the proposed rule change is 
included below. Italics indicate new text; brackets indicate deletions.

ARTICLE XX

Regular Trading Sessions

* * * * *

Guaranteed Execution System and Midwest Automated Execution System

    Rule 37. (a) No change to text.
    (b) No change to text.
    (1)-(10) No change to text.
    (11) CHXpress Orders. This section applies to the execution and 
display of orders through CHXpress, an automated functionality offered 
by the Exchange. All other rules of the Exchange are applicable, unless 
expressly superseded by this section.
* * * * *
    (H) A CHX specialist may not charge a commission for execution of a 
CHXpress order.
* * * * *

ARTICLE XXX

Specialists

* * * * *

Precedence to Orders in Book

    RULE 2. The specialist, co-specialist and relief specialist shall 
at all times give precedence to orders in the book for purchase or sale 
of securities over the orders which originate with him or it as a 
dealer, provided, his or its orders and those of his or its customer 
are market orders, or limited orders at the same price. Notwithstanding 
the foregoing, whenever a specialist, co-specialist or relief 
specialist elects to accept a professional order for the book which is 
not required to be accepted by such specialist, co-specialist or relief 
specialist pursuant to the rules and polices of the Exchange, such 
specialist, co-specialist or relief specialist is not required to 
relinquish precedence to such order over the orders which originate 
with him or it as dealer, provided (a) his or its orders and those of 
his or its customer are limited orders at the same price and (b) the 
specialist, co-specialist or relief specialist is displaying his or its 
order, including its size, through the quotation system. [No 
specialist, co-specialist or relief specialist may charge a Participant 
a commission in any transaction in which he or it is a principal.]

* * * Interpretations and Policies

    .005 No specialist, co-specialist or relief specialist may charge a 
Participant a commission in any transaction in which such specialist, 
co-specialist or relief specialist is a principal, or for execution of 
any CHXpress order.
* * * * *

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and 
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements 
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and 
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The 
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in 
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in 
Sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such 
statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and 
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The Exchange is rolling out a new, automated functionality for the 
handling of CHXpress orders. According to the Exchange, the CHXpress 
functionality is designed to provide additional opportunities for the 
Exchange's participants to seek and receive liquidity through automated 
executions of orders at the Exchange.\5\ With a few exceptions, 
CHXpress orders will be executed immediately and automatically against 
same or better-priced orders in the specialist's book, or against the 
specialist's quote (when CHXpress is available).\6\ If a CHXpress order 
cannot be immediately executed, it will be placed in the specialist's 
book for display or later execution.\7\ A CHX specialist may not cancel 
or place a CHXpress order on hold or otherwise prevent the order-
sending firm from canceling the order. In addition, CHX specialists do 
not provide CHXpress orders with the execution guarantees that might 
otherwise be available to agency limit orders.\8\ Specifically, these 
orders are not eligible for automated price improvement, or execution 
based on quotes in the national market system or prints in the primary 
market for a security. CHX specialists also would not be required to 
seek liquidity for CHXpress orders in other markets.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 50481 (Sept. 30, 
2004); 69 FR 60197 (Oct. 7, 2004) (SR-CHX-2004-12).
    \6\ If the execution of a CHXpress order would cause an improper 
trade-through of another ITS market, the CHXpress order would be 
automatically cancelled. If trading in an issue has been halted, all 
CHXpress orders in that issue would be automatically cancelled. See 
CHX Article XX, Rule 37(b)(11)(C).
    \7\ A CHXpress order will be instantaneously and automatically 
displayed when it constitutes the best bid or offer in the CHX book. 
See CHX Article XX, Rule 37(b)(11)(D). CHXpress orders, like all 
other orders at the Exchange, will not be eligible for automated 
display if that display would improperly lock or cross another ITS 
market. A CHXpress order that would improperly lock or cross the 
NBBO will be cancelled. Because CHXpress orders will be 
automatically displayed, there is no mechanism to allow them to be 
excluded from the CHX's quote.
    \8\ See CHX Article XX, Rule 37(b)(11)(E)-(F).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Through this filing, the Exchange seeks to clarify that a CHX 
specialist would not be permitted to charge a commission in connection 
with the execution of a CHXpress order. The Exchange believes that this 
clarification is appropriate for several reasons. First, as noted 
above, the handling of these orders within the Exchange's systems is 
entirely automatic--orders can execute automatically and be displayed 
automatically. Moreover, CHX specialists would not provide CHXpress 
orders with the execution guarantees that might otherwise be available 
to agency limit orders. Specifically, these orders would not be 
eligible for automated price improvement, or execution based on quotes 
in the national market system or prints in the primary market for a 
security. A CHX specialist also would not act as agent for the orders 
in other markets.
2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes the proposal is consistent with the 
requirements of the Act and the rules and regulations thereunder that 
are applicable to a national securities exchange, and, in particular, 
with the requirements of Section 6(b) of the Act.\9\ The Exchange 
believes the proposal is consistent with Section 6(b)(5) of the 
Act,\10\ in that the

[[Page 17745]]

proposal is designed to promote just and equitable principles of trade, 
to remove impediments, and to perfect the mechanism of, a free and open 
market and a national market system, and, in general, to protect 
investors and the public interest.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \10\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will 
impose any inappropriate burden on competition.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed 
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants or Others

    The Exchange has neither solicited nor received written comments on 
the proposed rule change.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for 
Commission Action

    Within 35 days of the date of publication of this notice in the 
Federal Register or within such longer period (i) as the Commission may 
designate up to 90 days of such date if it finds such longer period to 
be appropriate and publishes its reasons for so finding or (ii) as to 
which the Exchange consents, the Commission will:
    (A) By order approve the proposed rule change, or
    (B) Institute proceedings to determine whether the proposed rule 
change should be disapproved.

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and 
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule 
change, as amended, is consistent with the Act. Comments may be 
submitted by any of the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (https://
www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an e-mail to rule-comments@sec.gov. Please include 
File Number SR-CHX-2005-04 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Jonathan G. Katz, 
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 450 Fifth Street, NW., 
Washington, DC 20549-0609.
    All submissions should refer to File Number SR-CHX-2005-04. This 
file number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used. 
To help the Commission process and review your comments more 
efficiently, please use only one method. The Commission will post all 
comments on the Commission's Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, 
all written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that 
are filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating 
to the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, 
other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance 
with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for inspection 
and copying in the Commission's Public Reference Room. Copies of the 
filing also will be available for inspection and copying at the 
principal office of the Exchange. All comments received will be posted 
without change; the Commission does not edit personal identifying 
information from submissions. You should submit only information that 
you wish to make available publicly. All submissions should refer to 
File Number SR-CHX-2005-04 and should be submitted on or before April 
28, 2005.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Market Regulation, 
pursuant to delegated authority.\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Margaret H. McFarland,
Deputy Secretary. 7
[FR Doc. E5-1584 Filed 4-6-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.