Sugar From Belgium, France, and Germany; Notice of Final Results of Expedited Sunset Reviews of Antidumping Duty Findings, 17231-17232 [E5-1537]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 64 / Tuesday, April 5, 2005 / Notices
Needs and Uses: United States vessels
that fish on the high seas are required
to possess a permit issued under the
High Seas Fishing Compliance Act.
Applicants must submit information to
identify their vessels and intended
fishing areas. The application
information is used to process
applications and maintain a register of
U.S. vessels authorized to fish on the
high seas.
Affected Public: Business or other forprofit organizations; State, local or tribal
government.
Frequency: Every five years.
Respondent’s Obligation: Required to
obtain or retain benefits.
OMB Desk Officer: David Rostker,
(202) 395–3897.
Copies of the above information
collection proposal can be obtained by
calling or writing Diana Hynek,
Departmental Paperwork Clearance
Officer, (202) 482–0266, Department of
Commerce, Room 6625, 14th and
Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington,
DC 20230 (or via the Internet at
dHynek@doc.gov).
Written comments and
recommendations for the proposed
information collection should be sent
within 30 days of publication of this
notice to David Rostker, OMB Desk
Officer, fax number (202) 395–7285, or
David_Rostker@omb.eop.gov.
Dated: March 30, 2005.
Gwellnar Banks,
Management Analyst, Office of the Chief
Information Officer.
[FR Doc. 05–6673 Filed 4–4–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
A–552–801
Certain Frozen Fish Fillets from the
Socialist Republic of Vietnam:
Extension of Time Limit for Preliminary
Results of the First Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review
Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
EFFECTIVE DATE: April 5, 2005.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Irene Gorelik or Matthew Renkey, AD/
CVD Operations, Office 9, Import
Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230;
telephone (202) 482–6905 and (202)
482–2312, respectively.
VerDate jul<14>2003
19:48 Apr 04, 2005
Jkt 205001
On September 22, 2004, the
Department published its notice of
initiation of an antidumping
administrative review on certain frozen
fish fillets from Vietnam. See Initiation
of Antidumping and Countervailing
Duty Administrative Reviews and
Request for Revocation in Part, 69 FR
56745 (September 22, 2004). The
Department subsequently received
timely withdrawal requests from four of
the eight exporters that requested a
review: An Giang Fisheries Import and
Export Joint Stock Company (October
26, 2004); AFIEX (October 19, 2004);
MEKONIMEX (November 5, 2004); and
QVD Food Co., Ltd. (September 29,
2004). On January 28, 2005, the
Department published a notice of
rescission, in part, of antidumping duty
administrative review for those
companies that filed withdrawal
requests. See Certain Frozen Fish Fillets
From the Socialist Republic of Vietnam:
Rescission, in Part, of Antidumping
Duty Administrative Review, 70 FR 4092
(January 28, 2005). The Department is
not rescinding its review of Can Tho
Agricultural and Animal Products
Import–Export Company (CATACO);
Phan Quan Company, Ltd.; Phu Thanh
Company, Co.; or Vinh Hoan Company,
Ltd. On March 16, 2005, the Catfish
Farmers of America and individual U.S.
catfish processors (collectively,
‘‘Petitioners’’) submitted a timely
request for a 120 day extension of the
preliminary results of this review. The
preliminary results of this
administrative review are currently due
no later than May 3, 2005.
Extension of Time Limit for Preliminary
Results
International Trade Administration
AGENCY:
Background
Pursuant to section 751(a)(3)(A) of the
Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (‘‘the
Act’’), the Department shall issue
preliminary results in an administrative
review of an antidumping duty order
within 245 days after the last day of the
anniversary month of the date of
publication of the order. The Act further
provides, however, that the Department
may extend that 245-day period to 365
days if it determines it is not practicable
to complete the review within the
foregoing time period. The Department
finds that it is not practicable to
complete the preliminary results in the
administrative review of certain frozen
fish fillets from Vietnam within this
time limit. Specifically, as noted in the
Petitioners’ request, there are complex
issues related to production processes
that requires further analysis.
Accordingly, the Department finds that
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
17231
additional time is needed in order to
complete these preliminary results.
Section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act and
section 351.213(h)(2) of the
Department’s regulations allow the
Department to extend the deadline for
the preliminary results to a maximum of
365 days from the last of the anniversary
month of the order. For the reasons
noted above, we are extending the time
for the completion of the preliminary
results of this review until no later than
August 31, 2005. The deadline for the
final results of the administrative review
continues to be 120 days after the
publication of the preliminary results.
Dated: March 30, 2005.
Barbara E. Tillman,
Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration.
[FR Doc. E5–1536 Filed 4–4–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–423–077, A–427–078, A–428–082]
Sugar From Belgium, France, and
Germany; Notice of Final Results of
Expedited Sunset Reviews of
Antidumping Duty Findings
Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On September 1, 2004, the
Department of Commerce (‘‘the
Department’’) initiated sunset reviews of
the antidumping duty findings on sugar
from Belgium, France, and Germany
pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff
Act of 1930, as amended (‘‘the Act’’). On
the basis of a Notice of Intent to
Participate, adequate substantive
responses filed on behalf of domestic
interested parties, and inadequate
responses from respondent interested
parties, the Department conducted
expedited (120-day) sunset reviews. As
a result of these sunset reviews, the
Department finds that revocation of the
antidumping duty findings would be
likely to lead to continuation or
recurrence of dumping. The dumping
margins are identified in the Final
Results of Reviews section of this notice.
DATES: Effective Date: April 5, 2005.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION: Hilary E.
Sadler, Esq., Office of Policy for Import
Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street & Constitution
Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230;
telephone: (202) 482–4340.
AGENCY:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
E:\FR\FM\05APN1.SGM
05APN1
17232
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 64 / Tuesday, April 5, 2005 / Notices
Background
On September 1, 2004, the
Department published the notice of
initiation of the sunset reviews of the
antidumping duty findings on sugar
from Belgium, France, and Germany.1
On September 13, 2004, the Department
received a Notice of Intent to Participate
from the American Sugar Cane League,
the Sugar Cane Growers Cooperative of
Florida, the Florida Sugar Cane League,
the Hawaii Sugar Growers, the Rio
Grande Valley Sugar Growers, the U.S.
Beet Sugar Association, and the
American Sugarbeet Growers
Association (collectively ‘‘domestic
interested parties’’) within the deadline
specified in section 315.218(d)(1)(i) of
the Department’s regulations. The
domestic interested parties claimed
interested party status under section
771(9)(E) of the Act, as a trade
association, a majority of whose
members produce the like product in
the United States. On October 1, 2004,
the Department received complete
substantive responses from the domestic
interested parties within the deadline
specified in section 351.218(d)(3)(i) of
the Department’s regulations. We did
not receive responses from any
respondent interested parties to this
proceeding. As a result, pursuant to
section 751(c)(3)(B) of the Act and
section 351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2) of the
Department’s regulations, the
Department determined to conduct
expedited reviews of these findings.
Scope of the Findings
Imports covered by these findings are
shipments of sugar, both raw and
refined, with the exception of specialty
sugars, from Belgium, France and
Germany. The finding on sugar from
France excludes homeopathic sugar
pellets meeting the following criteria:
(1) Composed of 85 percent sucrose and
15 percent lactose; (2) have a polished,
matte appearance, and more uniformly
porous than domestic sugar cubes; (3)
produced in two sizes of 2 mm and 3.8
mm in diameter. See Sugar from France;
Final Results of Changed Circumstances
Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review, and Revocation in Part of
Antidumping Finding, 61 FR 40609
(August 5, 1996). The merchandise
subject to these findings is currently
classifiable in the Harmonized Tariff
Schedule of the United States
(‘‘HTSUS’’) at subheadings: 1701.11.05,
1701.11.10, 1701.11.20, 1701.11.50,
1701.12.05, 1701.12.10, 1701.12.50,
1701.91.05, 1701.91.10, 1701.91.30,
1 See Initiation of Five-Year (‘‘Sunset’’) Reviews,
69 FR 53408 (September 1, 2004) (‘‘Initiation
Notice’’).
VerDate jul<14>2003
19:48 Apr 04, 2005
Jkt 205001
1701.99.05, 1701.99.1000, 1701.99.1090,
1701.99.5000, 1701.99.5090, 1702.90.05,
1702.90.10, 1702.90.20, 2106.90.42,
2106.90.44, and 2106.90.46. Although
the HTSUS subheadings are provided
for convenience and customs purposes,
the written description of the scope of
the findings is dispositive.
Analysis of Comments Received
All issues raised in these reviews are
addressed in the ‘‘Issues and Decision
Memorandum’’ (‘‘Decision
Memorandum’’) from Ronald K.
Lorentzen, Acting Director, Office of
Policy, Import Administration, to Joseph
A. Spetrini, Acting Assistant Secretary
for Import Administration, dated March
30, 2005, which is hereby adopted by
this notice. The issues discussed in the
Decision Memo include the likelihood
of continuation or recurrence of
dumping and the magnitude of the
margins likely to prevail if the findings
were revoked. Parties can find a
complete discussion of all issues raised
in these reviews and the corresponding
recommendations in this public
memorandum which is on file in room
B–099 of the main Commerce Building.
In addition, a complete version of the
Decision Memorandum can be accessed
directly on the Web at https://
ia.ita.doc.gov/sunset/, under
the heading ‘‘April 2005.’’ The paper
copy and electronic version of the
Decision Memorandum are identical in
content.
Final Results of Reviews ≤We
determine that revocation of the
antidumping duty findings on sugar
from Belgium, France, and Germany
would likely lead to continuation or
recurrence of dumping at the following
weighted-average percentage margins:
with the regulations and terms of an
APO is a violation which is subject to
sanction.
We are issuing and publishing the
results and notice in accordance with
sections 751(c), 752, and 777(i)(1) of the
Act.
Dated: March 30, 2005.
Joseph A. Spetrini,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration.
[FR Doc. E5–1537 Filed 4–4–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–570–601]
Extension of Time Limit for the
Preliminary Results of Antidumping
Duty Administrative Review: Tapered
Roller Bearings, and Parts Thereof,
Finished or Unfinished, From the
People’s Republic of China
Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce
DATES: Effective Date: April 5, 2005.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Laurel Lacivita or Eugene Degnan, AD/
CVD Operations, Office 8, Import
Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230;
telephone (202) 482–4243 or (202) 482–
0414, respectively.
AGENCY:
Background
On July 28, 2004, the Department of
Commerce (‘‘the Department’’)
published in the Federal Register a
Weighted
notice of initiation of the antidumping
Manufacturers/exporters/
average
duty administrative review of tapered
producers
margin
(percent)
roller bearings and parts thereof,
finished or unfinished, from the
All Belgian Manufacturers/ExPeople’s Republic of China for the
porters .....................................
103
period June 1, 2003, through May 31,
All French Manufacturers/Exporters ...........................................
102 2004. See Initiation of Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Administrative
All German Manufacturers/Exporters .....................................
121 Reviews and Request for Revocation in
Part, 69 FR 45010 (July 28, 2004). On
This notice also serves as the only
February 4, 2005, the Department
reminder to parties subject to
published in the Federal Register a
administrative protective orders
notice extending the time limit for the
(‘‘APO’’) of their responsibility
preliminary results of the administrative
concerning the return or destruction of
review from March 2, 2005, to May 1,
proprietary information disclosed under 2005. See Extension of Time Limit for
APO in accordance with 19 CFR
the Preliminary Results of Antidumping
351.305 of the Department’s regulations. Duty Administrative Review: Tapered
Timely notification of the return or
Roller Bearings, and Parts Thereof,
destruction of APO materials or
Finished or Unfinished From the
conversion to judicial protective order is People’s Republic of China 70 FR 5967
hereby requested. Failure to comply
(February 4, 2005). The preliminary
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\05APN1.SGM
05APN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 64 (Tuesday, April 5, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 17231-17232]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E5-1537]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-423-077, A-427-078, A-428-082]
Sugar From Belgium, France, and Germany; Notice of Final Results
of Expedited Sunset Reviews of Antidumping Duty Findings
AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On September 1, 2004, the Department of Commerce (``the
Department'') initiated sunset reviews of the antidumping duty findings
on sugar from Belgium, France, and Germany pursuant to section 751(c)
of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (``the Act''). On the basis of a
Notice of Intent to Participate, adequate substantive responses filed
on behalf of domestic interested parties, and inadequate responses from
respondent interested parties, the Department conducted expedited (120-
day) sunset reviews. As a result of these sunset reviews, the
Department finds that revocation of the antidumping duty findings would
be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of dumping. The dumping
margins are identified in the Final Results of Reviews section of this
notice.
DATES: Effective Date: April 5, 2005.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION: Hilary E. Sadler, Esq., Office of Policy for
Import Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S.
Department of Commerce, 14th Street & Constitution Avenue, NW.,
Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-4340.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
[[Page 17232]]
Background
On September 1, 2004, the Department published the notice of
initiation of the sunset reviews of the antidumping duty findings on
sugar from Belgium, France, and Germany.\1\ On September 13, 2004, the
Department received a Notice of Intent to Participate from the American
Sugar Cane League, the Sugar Cane Growers Cooperative of Florida, the
Florida Sugar Cane League, the Hawaii Sugar Growers, the Rio Grande
Valley Sugar Growers, the U.S. Beet Sugar Association, and the American
Sugarbeet Growers Association (collectively ``domestic interested
parties'') within the deadline specified in section 315.218(d)(1)(i) of
the Department's regulations. The domestic interested parties claimed
interested party status under section 771(9)(E) of the Act, as a trade
association, a majority of whose members produce the like product in
the United States. On October 1, 2004, the Department received complete
substantive responses from the domestic interested parties within the
deadline specified in section 351.218(d)(3)(i) of the Department's
regulations. We did not receive responses from any respondent
interested parties to this proceeding. As a result, pursuant to section
751(c)(3)(B) of the Act and section 351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2) of the
Department's regulations, the Department determined to conduct
expedited reviews of these findings.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See Initiation of Five-Year (``Sunset'') Reviews, 69 FR
53408 (September 1, 2004) (``Initiation Notice'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Scope of the Findings
Imports covered by these findings are shipments of sugar, both raw
and refined, with the exception of specialty sugars, from Belgium,
France and Germany. The finding on sugar from France excludes
homeopathic sugar pellets meeting the following criteria: (1) Composed
of 85 percent sucrose and 15 percent lactose; (2) have a polished,
matte appearance, and more uniformly porous than domestic sugar cubes;
(3) produced in two sizes of 2 mm and 3.8 mm in diameter. See Sugar
from France; Final Results of Changed Circumstances Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review, and Revocation in Part of Antidumping Finding,
61 FR 40609 (August 5, 1996). The merchandise subject to these findings
is currently classifiable in the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the
United States (``HTSUS'') at subheadings: 1701.11.05, 1701.11.10,
1701.11.20, 1701.11.50, 1701.12.05, 1701.12.10, 1701.12.50, 1701.91.05,
1701.91.10, 1701.91.30, 1701.99.05, 1701.99.1000, 1701.99.1090,
1701.99.5000, 1701.99.5090, 1702.90.05, 1702.90.10, 1702.90.20,
2106.90.42, 2106.90.44, and 2106.90.46. Although the HTSUS subheadings
are provided for convenience and customs purposes, the written
description of the scope of the findings is dispositive.
Analysis of Comments Received
All issues raised in these reviews are addressed in the ``Issues
and Decision Memorandum'' (``Decision Memorandum'') from Ronald K.
Lorentzen, Acting Director, Office of Policy, Import Administration, to
Joseph A. Spetrini, Acting Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration, dated March 30, 2005, which is hereby adopted by this
notice. The issues discussed in the Decision Memo include the
likelihood of continuation or recurrence of dumping and the magnitude
of the margins likely to prevail if the findings were revoked. Parties
can find a complete discussion of all issues raised in these reviews
and the corresponding recommendations in this public memorandum which
is on file in room B-099 of the main Commerce Building.
In addition, a complete version of the Decision Memorandum can be
accessed directly on the Web at https://ia.ita.doc.gov/sunset/
index.html, under the heading ``April 2005.'' The paper copy and
electronic version of the Decision Memorandum are identical in content.
Final Results of Reviews >We determine that revocation of the
antidumping duty findings on sugar from Belgium, France, and Germany
would likely lead to continuation or recurrence of dumping at the
following weighted-average percentage margins:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Weighted
average
Manufacturers/exporters/ producers margin
(percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
All Belgian Manufacturers/Exporters......................... 103
All French Manufacturers/Exporters.......................... 102
All German Manufacturers/Exporters.......................... 121
------------------------------------------------------------------------
This notice also serves as the only reminder to parties subject to
administrative protective orders (``APO'') of their responsibility
concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305 of the
Department's regulations. Timely notification of the return or
destruction of APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order
is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and terms
of an APO is a violation which is subject to sanction.
We are issuing and publishing the results and notice in accordance
with sections 751(c), 752, and 777(i)(1) of the Act.
Dated: March 30, 2005.
Joseph A. Spetrini,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Import Administration.
[FR Doc. E5-1537 Filed 4-4-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
