Pepco Holdings, Inc.; Filings Under the Public Utility Holding Company Act of 1935, as Amended (“Act”), 17271-17272 [E5-1533]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 64 / Tuesday, April 5, 2005 / Notices
two amendments to the joint industry
plans for disseminating market
information. In particular, the
Commission will consider whether to
adopt the following rules and
amendments:
a. Rule 611 of Regulation NMS
(‘‘Order Protection Rule’’), which would
establish marketwide price protection
for automated quotations that are
immediately accessible;
b. Rule 610 of Regulation NMS
(‘‘Access Rule’’), which would promote
fair and non-discriminatory access to
quotations through a private access
approach and establish a limit on access
fees to harmonize the pricing of
quotations across different trading
centers;
c. Rule 612 of Regulation NMS (‘‘SubPenny Rule’’), which would establish a
uniform pricing increment of no less
than a penny for orders, quotations, or
indications of interest, except for those
priced at less than $1.00 per share;
d. Amendments to Rules 11Aa3–1 and
11Ac1–2 under the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 (‘‘Exchange Act’’)
(redesignated as Rule 601 and 603 of
Regulation NMS) (‘‘Market Data Rules’’),
which would update the requirements
for consolidating, distributing, and
displaying market information, and
amendments to the joint industry plans
for disseminating market information
that would modify the formulas for
allocating plan revenues (‘‘Allocation
Amendment’’) and broaden
participation in plan governance
(’’Governance Amendment’’); and
e. Redesignation of the national
market system (‘‘NMS’’) rules adopted
under the Exchange Act and inclusion
of those rules, as well as Rules 610, 611,
and 612, under Regulation NMS.
Regulation NMS also would include a
separate definitional rule that would (i)
retain most of the definitions currently
used in the NMS rules, (ii) include new
definitions related to the rules being
considered for adoption, and (iii) update
or eliminate obsolete definitions in the
NMS rules.
At times, changes in Commission
priorities require alterations in the
scheduling of meeting items.
For further information and to
ascertain what, if any, matters have been
added, deleted or postponed, please
contact: The Office of the Secretary at
(202) 942–7070.
Dated: March 30, 2005.
Jonathan G. Katz,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 05–6740 Filed 3–31–05; 4:42 pm]
BILLING CODE 8010–01–P
VerDate jul<14>2003
19:48 Apr 04, 2005
Jkt 205001
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 35–27953; 70–10290]
Pepco Holdings, Inc.; Filings Under the
Public Utility Holding Company Act of
1935, as Amended (‘‘Act’’)
March 30, 2005.
Notice is hereby given that the
following filing(s) has/have been made
with the Commission pursuant to
provisions of the Act and rules
promulgated under the Act. All
interested persons are referred to the
application(s) and/or declaration(s) for
complete statements of the proposed
transaction(s) summarized below. The
application(s) and/or declaration(s) and
any amendment(s) is/are available for
public inspection through the
Commission’s Branch of Public
Reference.
Interested persons wishing to
comment or request a hearing on the
application(s) and/or declaration(s)
should submit their views in writing by
April 25, 2005, to the Secretary,
Securities and Exchange Commission,
Washington, DC 20549–0609, and serve
a copy on the relevant applicant(s) and/
or declarant(s) at the address(es)
specified below. Proof of service (by
affidavit or, in the case of an attorney at
law, by certificate) should be filed with
the request. Any request for hearing
should identify specifically the issues of
facts or law that are disputed. A person
who so requests will be notified of any
hearing, if ordered, and will receive a
copy of any notice or order issued in the
matter. After April 25, 2005, the
application(s) and/or declaration(s), as
filed or as amended, may be granted
and/or permitted to become effective.
Notice of Proposal To Amend Charter;
Order Authorizing the Solicitation of
Proxies
Pepco Holdings, Inc. (‘‘PHI’’), 701
Ninth Street, Washington, DC 20068, a
Delaware corporation and a registered
public utility holding company under
the Act, has filed a declaration
(‘‘Declaration’’) under to sections 6(a)(2)
and 12(e) of the Act and rules 54, 62 and
65 under the Act.
PHI requests authority to (i) amend its
corporate charter to eliminate
classification of the Board of Directors
(‘‘Proposed Amendment’’) and (ii)
solicit proxies from the holders of PHI’s
shares of common stock to implement
the Proposed Amendment.
PHI states that it has had a staggered
Board of Directors in place since it
became a public company at the time of
the closing of the merger involving its
public utility subsidiary Potomac
PO 00000
Frm 00044
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
17271
Electric Power Company (‘‘Pepco’’) and
Conectiv, formerly a registered public
utility holding company, in 2002. Prior
to the merger, Pepco had a staggered
board beginning in 1988 and Conectiv
had a staggered board from the time it
became a public company in 1998.
Under PHI’s staggered board
arrangement, the Board of Directors is
divided into three classes, with the
directors of one of the classes elected
annually for three-year terms.
PHI states that the Board of Director’s
Corporate Governance/Nominating
Committee conducted a review of the
relative merits of annually elected and
staggered boards. The Nominating
Committee recommended to the Board
that the staggered election of directors
be eliminated. After reviewing and
assessing the recommendation of the
Nominating Committee, the Board of
Directors adopted a resolution,
declaring it advisable that section C of
Article V of PHI’s Restated Certificate of
Incorporation be amended to eliminate
classification of the Board of Directors.
PHI states that if the Proposed
Amendment is approved, each nominee
for election as a director, including
directors standing for reelection, will be
elected for a one-year term. The
Proposed Amendment will not shorten
the term of any director elected at or
prior to the 2005 Annual Meeting.
Accordingly, in 2006 only the nominees
to succeed the directors whose terms
expire in 2006, would be elected for
one-year terms. In 2007, the nominees to
succeed the directors whose terms
expire in 2007 and to succeed the
directors elected in 2006 would be
elected for one-year terms. Beginning in
2008, all of the members of the Board
of Directors would be elected for oneyear terms. Under paragraph D of
Article V of the Restated Certificate of
Incorporation, any vacancy on the Board
of Directors resulting other than because
of an increase in the authorized number
of directors elected by shareholders may
be filled by a majority of the directors
then in office. In accordance with this
provision, if during the transition period
a vacancy occurs with respect to a
director whose term of office continues
beyond the next annual meeting, the
term of any director elected to fill such
a vacancy shall expire at the next
shareholders’ meeting at which
directors are elected, and the remainder
of the term, if any, shall be filled by a
director elected at that meeting.
PHI states that in accordance with
paragraph G of Article V of the Restated
Certificate of Incorporation, adoption of
the Proposed Amendment requires the
affirmative vote of the holders of twothirds the outstanding shares of PHI’s
E:\FR\FM\05APN1.SGM
05APN1
17272
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 64 / Tuesday, April 5, 2005 / Notices
common stock. Accordingly PHI
requests that an order be issued under
rule 62(d) of the Act authorizing
commencement of the proxy
solicitation.
The transaction is also governed by
the conditions of rule 53(a). As of
September 30, 2004, PHI’s ‘‘aggregate
investment,’’ as defined in rule 53(a)(1)
was approximately $3,013.3 million and
PHI’s consolidated retained earnings
was $904.6 million. Accordingly, at
September 30, 2004, PHI’s aggregate
investment exceeded 50% of its
consolidated retained earnings, the
‘‘safe harbor’’ limitation contained in
rule 53(a). However, by order dated July
31, 2002 (HCAR No. 27557) (‘‘Financing
Order’’), the Commission authorized
PHI to increase its aggregate investment
to an amount equal to the sum of 100%
of consolidated retained earnings plus
$3.5 billion. At September 30, 2004,
based on the Financing Order, PHI
could have had an aggregate investment
of $4,404.6 million. Therefore, although
PHI’s aggregate investment at such date
exceeded the 50% ‘‘safe harbor’’
limitation of rule 53, it is within the
higher investment level granted by the
Financing Order.
PHI states that it currently complies
with, and will comply with, the record
keeping requirements of rule 53(a)(2),
the limitation under rule 53(a)(3) on the
use of the PHI system’s domestic public
utility company personnel to render
services to exempt wholesale generators
(‘‘EWGs’’), as that term is defined in
section 32 of the Act, and foreign utility
companies (‘‘FUCOs’’), as that term is
defined in section 33 of the Act, and the
requirements of rule 53(a)(4) concerning
the submission of copies of certain
filings under the Act to retail regulatory
commissions. PHI states that none of the
circumstances described in rule 53(b)
have occurred, and rule 53(c) is
inapplicable by its terms.
Fees and expenses in the estimated
amount of $670,000 are expected to be
incurred in connection with the
proposed transactions (including costs
associated with the solicitation of
proxies). PHI states that no state or
federal commission, other than this
Commission, has jurisdiction over the
proposed transactions.
PHI has filed its proxy solicitation
materials and requests that its proposal
to solicit proxies be permitted to
become effective immediately, as
provided in rule 62(d) under the Act. It
appears to the Commission that the
Declaration, with respect to the
proposed solicitation of proxies, should
be permitted to become effective
immediately under rule 62(d).
VerDate jul<14>2003
19:48 Apr 04, 2005
Jkt 205001
It is ordered, under rule 62 under the
Act, that the Declaration regarding the
proposed solicitation of proxies from
PHI shareholders become effective
immediately, subject to the terms and
conditions contained in rule 24 under
the Act.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Investment Management, pursuant to
delegated authority.
Margaret H. McFarland,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. E5–1533 Filed 4–4–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–51446; File No. SR–Amex–
2005–032]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Notice
of Filing and Order Granting
Accelerated Approval of Proposed
Rule Change by the American Stock
Exchange LLC To Trade the
streetTRACKS Gold Shares Pursuant
to Unlisted Trading Privileges
March 29, 2005.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on March 8,
2005, the American Stock Exchange LLC
(‘‘Amex’’ or ‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission
(‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule
change as described in Items I and II
below, which Items have been
substantially prepared by the Exchange.
The proposal would permit the
Exchange to trade the streetTRACKS
Gold Shares (‘‘GLD’’ or ‘‘Shares’’)
pursuant to unlisted trading privileges
(‘‘UTP’’). The Shares represent units of
fractional undivided beneficial interests
in and ownership of the streetTRACKS
Gold Trust (‘‘Trust’’). The Commission
previously has approved GLD for
original listing and trading on the New
York Stock Exchange, Inc. (‘‘NYSE’’).3
The Commission is publishing this
notice and order to solicit comments on
the proposed rule change from
interested persons and to approve the
proposed rule change on an accelerated
basis.
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
CFR 240.19b–4.
3 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 50603
(October 28, 2004), 69 FR 64614 (November 5, 2004)
(‘‘NYSE Approval Order’’).
PO 00000
1 15
2 17
Frm 00045
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
Amex proposes to trade GLD pursuant
to UTP. The text of the proposed rule
change is available on the Exchange’s
Web site (https://www.amex.com), at the
principal office of the Exchange, and at
the Commission’s Public Reference
Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of, and basis for,
the proposed rule change and discussed
any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of these
statements may be examined at the
places specified in Item III below. The
Exchange has prepared summaries, set
forth in Sections A, B, and C below, of
the most significant aspects of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
1. Purpose
The Exchange proposes to trade the
streetTRACKS Gold Shares (ticker
symbol: GLD) pursuant to UTP. The
value of each Share corresponds to a
fixed amount of gold 4 and fluctuates
with the spot price of gold. Purchasing
Shares in the Trust provides investors a
mechanism to participate in the gold
market. The Exchange proposes to adopt
Amex Rule 1000B, which incorporates
by reference Amex Rule 1000A et seq.,
and Amex Rules 1203A and 1204A,
governing the trading of the Shares on
the Exchange.
a. Description of the Gold Market
The global trade in gold consists of
over-the-counter (‘‘OTC’’) transactions
in spot, forwards, and options and other
derivatives, together with exchangetraded futures and options. The global
gold market consists of the following
components, described briefly below.
(1) The OTC Market
The OTC market trades on a
continuous basis 24 hours per day and
accounts for most global gold trading.
Liquidity in the OTC market can vary
from time to time during the course of
4 Initially, each Share will correspond to onetenth of a troy ounce of gold. The amount of gold
associated with each Share is expected to decrease
over time as the Trust incurs and pays maintenance
fees and other expenses.
E:\FR\FM\05APN1.SGM
05APN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 64 (Tuesday, April 5, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 17271-17272]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E5-1533]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 35-27953; 70-10290]
Pepco Holdings, Inc.; Filings Under the Public Utility Holding
Company Act of 1935, as Amended (``Act'')
March 30, 2005.
Notice is hereby given that the following filing(s) has/have been
made with the Commission pursuant to provisions of the Act and rules
promulgated under the Act. All interested persons are referred to the
application(s) and/or declaration(s) for complete statements of the
proposed transaction(s) summarized below. The application(s) and/or
declaration(s) and any amendment(s) is/are available for public
inspection through the Commission's Branch of Public Reference.
Interested persons wishing to comment or request a hearing on the
application(s) and/or declaration(s) should submit their views in
writing by April 25, 2005, to the Secretary, Securities and Exchange
Commission, Washington, DC 20549-0609, and serve a copy on the relevant
applicant(s) and/or declarant(s) at the address(es) specified below.
Proof of service (by affidavit or, in the case of an attorney at law,
by certificate) should be filed with the request. Any request for
hearing should identify specifically the issues of facts or law that
are disputed. A person who so requests will be notified of any hearing,
if ordered, and will receive a copy of any notice or order issued in
the matter. After April 25, 2005, the application(s) and/or
declaration(s), as filed or as amended, may be granted and/or permitted
to become effective.
Notice of Proposal To Amend Charter; Order Authorizing the Solicitation
of Proxies
Pepco Holdings, Inc. (``PHI''), 701 Ninth Street, Washington, DC
20068, a Delaware corporation and a registered public utility holding
company under the Act, has filed a declaration (``Declaration'') under
to sections 6(a)(2) and 12(e) of the Act and rules 54, 62 and 65 under
the Act.
PHI requests authority to (i) amend its corporate charter to
eliminate classification of the Board of Directors (``Proposed
Amendment'') and (ii) solicit proxies from the holders of PHI's shares
of common stock to implement the Proposed Amendment.
PHI states that it has had a staggered Board of Directors in place
since it became a public company at the time of the closing of the
merger involving its public utility subsidiary Potomac Electric Power
Company (``Pepco'') and Conectiv, formerly a registered public utility
holding company, in 2002. Prior to the merger, Pepco had a staggered
board beginning in 1988 and Conectiv had a staggered board from the
time it became a public company in 1998. Under PHI's staggered board
arrangement, the Board of Directors is divided into three classes, with
the directors of one of the classes elected annually for three-year
terms.
PHI states that the Board of Director's Corporate Governance/
Nominating Committee conducted a review of the relative merits of
annually elected and staggered boards. The Nominating Committee
recommended to the Board that the staggered election of directors be
eliminated. After reviewing and assessing the recommendation of the
Nominating Committee, the Board of Directors adopted a resolution,
declaring it advisable that section C of Article V of PHI's Restated
Certificate of Incorporation be amended to eliminate classification of
the Board of Directors.
PHI states that if the Proposed Amendment is approved, each nominee
for election as a director, including directors standing for
reelection, will be elected for a one-year term. The Proposed Amendment
will not shorten the term of any director elected at or prior to the
2005 Annual Meeting. Accordingly, in 2006 only the nominees to succeed
the directors whose terms expire in 2006, would be elected for one-year
terms. In 2007, the nominees to succeed the directors whose terms
expire in 2007 and to succeed the directors elected in 2006 would be
elected for one-year terms. Beginning in 2008, all of the members of
the Board of Directors would be elected for one-year terms. Under
paragraph D of Article V of the Restated Certificate of Incorporation,
any vacancy on the Board of Directors resulting other than because of
an increase in the authorized number of directors elected by
shareholders may be filled by a majority of the directors then in
office. In accordance with this provision, if during the transition
period a vacancy occurs with respect to a director whose term of office
continues beyond the next annual meeting, the term of any director
elected to fill such a vacancy shall expire at the next shareholders'
meeting at which directors are elected, and the remainder of the term,
if any, shall be filled by a director elected at that meeting.
PHI states that in accordance with paragraph G of Article V of the
Restated Certificate of Incorporation, adoption of the Proposed
Amendment requires the affirmative vote of the holders of two-thirds
the outstanding shares of PHI's
[[Page 17272]]
common stock. Accordingly PHI requests that an order be issued under
rule 62(d) of the Act authorizing commencement of the proxy
solicitation.
The transaction is also governed by the conditions of rule 53(a).
As of September 30, 2004, PHI's ``aggregate investment,'' as defined in
rule 53(a)(1) was approximately $3,013.3 million and PHI's consolidated
retained earnings was $904.6 million. Accordingly, at September 30,
2004, PHI's aggregate investment exceeded 50% of its consolidated
retained earnings, the ``safe harbor'' limitation contained in rule
53(a). However, by order dated July 31, 2002 (HCAR No. 27557)
(``Financing Order''), the Commission authorized PHI to increase its
aggregate investment to an amount equal to the sum of 100% of
consolidated retained earnings plus $3.5 billion. At September 30,
2004, based on the Financing Order, PHI could have had an aggregate
investment of $4,404.6 million. Therefore, although PHI's aggregate
investment at such date exceeded the 50% ``safe harbor'' limitation of
rule 53, it is within the higher investment level granted by the
Financing Order.
PHI states that it currently complies with, and will comply with,
the record keeping requirements of rule 53(a)(2), the limitation under
rule 53(a)(3) on the use of the PHI system's domestic public utility
company personnel to render services to exempt wholesale generators
(``EWGs''), as that term is defined in section 32 of the Act, and
foreign utility companies (``FUCOs''), as that term is defined in
section 33 of the Act, and the requirements of rule 53(a)(4) concerning
the submission of copies of certain filings under the Act to retail
regulatory commissions. PHI states that none of the circumstances
described in rule 53(b) have occurred, and rule 53(c) is inapplicable
by its terms.
Fees and expenses in the estimated amount of $670,000 are expected
to be incurred in connection with the proposed transactions (including
costs associated with the solicitation of proxies). PHI states that no
state or federal commission, other than this Commission, has
jurisdiction over the proposed transactions.
PHI has filed its proxy solicitation materials and requests that
its proposal to solicit proxies be permitted to become effective
immediately, as provided in rule 62(d) under the Act. It appears to the
Commission that the Declaration, with respect to the proposed
solicitation of proxies, should be permitted to become effective
immediately under rule 62(d).
It is ordered, under rule 62 under the Act, that the Declaration
regarding the proposed solicitation of proxies from PHI shareholders
become effective immediately, subject to the terms and conditions
contained in rule 24 under the Act.
For the Commission, by the Division of Investment Management,
pursuant to delegated authority.
Margaret H. McFarland,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. E5-1533 Filed 4-4-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-P
