Glad Manufacturing; Cartersville, GA; Notice of Negative Determination Regarding Application for Reconsideration, 17263-17264 [E5-1526]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 64 / Tuesday, April 5, 2005 / Notices DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Drug Enforcement Administration Employment and Training Administration Manufacturer of Controlled Substances; Notice of Application [TA–W–56,364; TA–W–56,364A; TA–W– 56,364B] Pursuant to § 1301.33(a) of Title 21 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), this is notice that on January 26, 2005, Stepan Company, Natural Products Dept., 100 W. Hunter Avenue, Maywood, New Jersey 07607, made application by renewal to the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) to be registered as a bulk manufacturer of the basic classes of controlled substances listed in Schedules II: Dunmore Furniture Industries a/k/a Hat, Inc., Plant 1, Hickory, NC; Dunmore Furniture Industries a/k/a Hat, Inc., Plant 2, Granite Falls, NC; Dunmore Furniture Industries a/k/a Hat, Inc., Plant 3, Newton, NC; Amended Certification Regarding Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance and Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance Drug Schedule Cocaine (9041) ............................. Benzoylecgonine (9180) ............... II II The company plans to manufacture the listed controlled substances in bulk for distribution to its customers. Any other such applicant and any person who is presently registered with DEA to manufacture such a substance may file comments or objections to the issuance of the proposed registration pursuant to 21 CFR 1301.33(a). Any such written comments or objections being sent via regular mail may be addressed, in quintuplicate, to the Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug Enforcement Administration, Washington, DC 20537, Attention: DEA Federal Register Representative, Liaison and Policy Section (ODL); or any being sent via express mail should be sent to DEA Headquarters, Attention: DEA Federal Register Representative/ODL, 2401 Jefferson-Davis Highway, Alexandria, Virginia 22301; and must be filed no later than June 6, 2005. Dated: March 29, 2005. William J. Walker, Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug Enforcement Administration. [FR Doc. 05–6696 Filed 4–4–05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4410–09–P In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2273) the Department of Labor issued a Certification of Eligibility to Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance and Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance on February 23, 2005, applicable to workers of Dunmore Furniture Industries, Plant 1, Hickory, North Carolina, Dunmore Furniture Plant 2, Granite Falls, North Carolina and Dunmore Furniture, Plant 3, Newton, North Carolina. The notice was published in the Federal Register on March 9, 2005 (70 FR 11704). At the request of the State agency, the Department reviewed the certification for workers of the subject firm. The workers were engaged in the production of upholstered furniture. New information shows that prior to October 2004, the name of the subject firm was Hat, Inc. a/k/a Dunmore Furniture Industries and that some workers separated from employment at the subject firm had their wages reported under a separate unemployment insurance (UI) tax account for Hat, Inc. Accordingly, the Department is amending the certification to properly reflect this matter. The intent of the Department’s certification is to include all workers of Dunmore Furniture Industries, Plant 1, Hickory, North Carolina, Dunmore Furniture, Plant 2, Granite Falls, North Carolina, and Dunmore Furniture, Plant 3, Newton, North Carolina, who were adversely affected by increased imports. The amended notice applicable to TA–W–56,364, TA–W–56,364A and TA–W–56,364B is hereby issued as follows: All workers of Dunmore Furniture Industries, a/k/a Hat, Inc., Plant 1, Hickory, North Carolina (TA–W–56,364), Dunmore Furniture Industries, a/k/a Hat, Inc., Plant 2, Granite Falls, North Carolina (TA–W– 56,364A) and Dunmore Furniture Industries, a/k/a Hat, Inc., Plant 3, Newton, North VerDate jul<14>2003 19:48 Apr 04, 2005 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00036 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 17263 Carolina (TA–W–56,364B), who became totally or partially separated from employment on or after January 14, 2004, through February 23, 2007, are eligible to apply for adjustment assistance under Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, and are also eligible to apply for alternative trade adjustment assistance under Section 246 of the Trade Act of 1974. Signed at Washington, DC, this 29th day of March 2005. Linda G. Poole, Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance. [FR Doc. E5–1525 Filed 4–4–05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4510–30–P DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Employment and Training Administration [TA–W–56,732] Eaton; Everett, WA; Notice of Termination of Investigation Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated on March 10, 2005 in response to a petition filed by a company official on behalf of workers at Eaton, Everett, Washington. The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. Consequently, the investigation has been terminated. Signed at Washington, DC, this 24th day of March, 2005. Richard Church, Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance. [FR Doc. E5–1530 Filed 4–4–05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4510–30–P DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Employment and Training Administration [TA–W–56,365] Glad Manufacturing; Cartersville, GA; Notice of Negative Determination Regarding Application for Reconsideration By application of March 2, 2005, a petitioner requested administrative reconsideration of the Department’s negative determination regarding eligibility for workers and former workers of the subject firm to apply for Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance (ATAA). The workers of Glad Manufacturing, Cartersville, Georgia were certified eligible to apply for Trade Adjustment Assistance (TAA) and denied to apply for ATAA on February 3, 2005. The E:\FR\FM\05APN1.SGM 05APN1 17264 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 64 / Tuesday, April 5, 2005 / Notices denial notice was published in the Federal Register on March 9, 2005 (70 FR 11706). Pursuant to 29 CFR 90.18(c) reconsideration may be granted under the following circumstances: (1) If it appears on the basis of facts not previously considered that the determination complained of was erroneous; (2) If it appears that the determination complained of was based on a mistake in the determination of facts not previously considered; or (3) If in the opinion of the Certifying Officer, a misinterpretation of facts or of the law justified reconsideration of the decision. The group eligibility criteria for the ATAA program that the Department must consider under Section 246 of the Trade Act are: 1. Whether a significant number of workers in the workers’ firm are 50 years of age or older. 2. Whether the workers in the workers’ firm possess skills that are not easily transferable. 3. The competitive conditions within the workers’ industry (i.e., conditions within the industry are adverse). The initial ATAA investigation determined that the skills of the subject worker group are easily transferable to other positions in the local area. In the request for reconsideration, the petitioner alleges that the separated group of workers who are 50 years and older includes employees whose skills are very limited and not easily transferable to other positions. The Department conducted additional investigation and contacted company official to determine workers’ eligibility for ATAA. Based on the company official’s statements it was revealed that there are several existing and new manufacturing facilities within the commuting area, which are in the process of hiring workers with skills similar to those possessed by the subject worker group. Consequently, the investigation confirmed that workers’ skills are easily transferable to other companies. Conclusion After review of the application and investigative findings, I conclude that there has been no error or misinterpretation of the law or of the facts which would justify reconsideration of the Department of Labor’s prior decision. Accordingly, the application is denied. VerDate jul<14>2003 19:48 Apr 04, 2005 Jkt 205001 Signed at Washington, DC, this 22nd day of March, 2005. Elliott S. Kushner, Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance. [FR Doc. E5–1526 Filed 4–4–05; 8:45 am] Signed at Washington, DC, this 25th day of March, 2005. Linda G. Poole, Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance. [FR Doc. E5–1527 Filed 4–4–05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4510–30–P BILLING CODE 4510–30–P DEPARTMENT OF LABOR DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Employment and Training Administration Employment and Training Administration [TA–W–51,937 and TA–W–51,937A] [TA–W–56,808] Hydro Gate Acquisition Company, Inc.; Commerce City, CO; Notice of Termination of Investigation Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated on March 24, 2005, in response to a worker petition filed by a company official on behalf of workers at Hydro Gate Acquisition, Inc., Commerce City, Colorado. The Department issued a certification regarding eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance and alternative trade adjustment assistance relating to the petitioning group of workers on February 7, 2005 (TA–W–56,352). Consequently, further investigation would serve no purpose, and the investigation has been terminated. Signed at Washington, DC, this 25th day of March 2005. Elliott S. Kushner, Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance. [FR Doc. E5–1529 Filed 4–4–05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4510–30–P DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Employment and Training Administration [TA–W–56,683] Intel Corporation, Hawthorn Farm 1, Hillsboro, OR; Notice of Termination of Investigation Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated on March 4, 2005 in response to a petition filed on behalf of workers at Intel Corporation, Hawthorn Farm 1, Hillsboro, Oregon. The petitioners have requested that the petition be withdrawn. Consequently, the investigation has been terminated. PO 00000 Frm 00037 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 Magnequench UG, Valparaiso, Indiana; Including an Employee of Magnequench UG, Valparaiso, Indiana, Located in Morgan Hills, CA; Amended Notice of Certification Regarding Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance In accordance with section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2273) the Department of Labor issued a Notice of Certification Regarding Eligibility to Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance on July 16, 2003, applicable to workers of Magnequench UG, Valparaiso, Indiana. The notice was published in the Federal Register on August 5, 2003 (68 FR 46231). At the request of the State agency, the Department reviewed the certification for workers of the subject firm. New information shows that a worker separation occurred involving an employee of the Valparaiso, Indiana facility of Magnequench UG who was located in Morgan Hills, California. Mr. James Place provided sales support services for the production of permanent magnets at the Valparaiso, Indiana location of the subject firm. Based on these findings, the Department is amending this certification to include an employee of the Valparaiso, Indiana facility of Magnequench UG located in Morgan Hills, California. The intent of the Department’s certification is to include all workers of Magnequench UG, Valparaiso, Indiana, who were adversely affected by a shift in production to Mexico. The amended notice applicable to TA–W–51,937 is hereby issued as follows: All workers of Magnequench UG, Valparaiso, Indiana (TA–W–51,937), including an employee of Magnequench UG, Valparaiso, Indiana, located in Morgan Hills, California (TA–W–51,937A), who became totally or partially separated from employment on or after May 30, 2002, through July 16, 2005 are eligible to apply for adjustment assistance under Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974. E:\FR\FM\05APN1.SGM 05APN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 64 (Tuesday, April 5, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 17263-17264]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E5-1526]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-56,365]


Glad Manufacturing; Cartersville, GA; Notice of Negative 
Determination Regarding Application for Reconsideration

    By application of March 2, 2005, a petitioner requested 
administrative reconsideration of the Department's negative 
determination regarding eligibility for workers and former workers of 
the subject firm to apply for Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance 
(ATAA).
    The workers of Glad Manufacturing, Cartersville, Georgia were 
certified eligible to apply for Trade Adjustment Assistance (TAA) and 
denied to apply for ATAA on February 3, 2005. The

[[Page 17264]]

denial notice was published in the Federal Register on March 9, 2005 
(70 FR 11706).
    Pursuant to 29 CFR 90.18(c) reconsideration may be granted under 
the following circumstances:
    (1) If it appears on the basis of facts not previously considered 
that the determination complained of was erroneous;
    (2) If it appears that the determination complained of was based on 
a mistake in the determination of facts not previously considered; or
    (3) If in the opinion of the Certifying Officer, a 
misinterpretation of facts or of the law justified reconsideration of 
the decision.
    The group eligibility criteria for the ATAA program that the 
Department must consider under Section 246 of the Trade Act are:
    1. Whether a significant number of workers in the workers' firm are 
50 years of age or older.
    2. Whether the workers in the workers' firm possess skills that are 
not easily transferable.
    3. The competitive conditions within the workers' industry (i.e., 
conditions within the industry are adverse).
    The initial ATAA investigation determined that the skills of the 
subject worker group are easily transferable to other positions in the 
local area.
    In the request for reconsideration, the petitioner alleges that the 
separated group of workers who are 50 years and older includes 
employees whose skills are very limited and not easily transferable to 
other positions.
    The Department conducted additional investigation and contacted 
company official to determine workers' eligibility for ATAA. Based on 
the company official's statements it was revealed that there are 
several existing and new manufacturing facilities within the commuting 
area, which are in the process of hiring workers with skills similar to 
those possessed by the subject worker group. Consequently, the 
investigation confirmed that workers' skills are easily transferable to 
other companies.

Conclusion

    After review of the application and investigative findings, I 
conclude that there has been no error or misinterpretation of the law 
or of the facts which would justify reconsideration of the Department 
of Labor's prior decision. Accordingly, the application is denied.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 22nd day of March, 2005.
Elliott S. Kushner,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E5-1526 Filed 4-4-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-P