Glad Manufacturing; Cartersville, GA; Notice of Negative Determination Regarding Application for Reconsideration, 17263-17264 [E5-1526]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 64 / Tuesday, April 5, 2005 / Notices
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Drug Enforcement Administration
Employment and Training
Administration
Manufacturer of Controlled
Substances; Notice of Application
[TA–W–56,364; TA–W–56,364A; TA–W–
56,364B]
Pursuant to § 1301.33(a) of Title 21 of
the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR),
this is notice that on January 26, 2005,
Stepan Company, Natural Products
Dept., 100 W. Hunter Avenue,
Maywood, New Jersey 07607, made
application by renewal to the Drug
Enforcement Administration (DEA) to
be registered as a bulk manufacturer of
the basic classes of controlled
substances listed in Schedules II:
Dunmore Furniture Industries a/k/a
Hat, Inc., Plant 1, Hickory, NC;
Dunmore Furniture Industries a/k/a
Hat, Inc., Plant 2, Granite Falls, NC;
Dunmore Furniture Industries a/k/a
Hat, Inc., Plant 3, Newton, NC;
Amended Certification Regarding
Eligibility To Apply for Worker
Adjustment Assistance and Alternative
Trade Adjustment Assistance
Drug
Schedule
Cocaine (9041) .............................
Benzoylecgonine (9180) ...............
II
II
The company plans to manufacture
the listed controlled substances in bulk
for distribution to its customers.
Any other such applicant and any
person who is presently registered with
DEA to manufacture such a substance
may file comments or objections to the
issuance of the proposed registration
pursuant to 21 CFR 1301.33(a).
Any such written comments or
objections being sent via regular mail
may be addressed, in quintuplicate, to
the Deputy Assistant Administrator,
Office of Diversion Control, Drug
Enforcement Administration,
Washington, DC 20537, Attention: DEA
Federal Register Representative, Liaison
and Policy Section (ODL); or any being
sent via express mail should be sent to
DEA Headquarters, Attention: DEA
Federal Register Representative/ODL,
2401 Jefferson-Davis Highway,
Alexandria, Virginia 22301; and must be
filed no later than June 6, 2005.
Dated: March 29, 2005.
William J. Walker,
Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of
Diversion Control, Drug Enforcement
Administration.
[FR Doc. 05–6696 Filed 4–4–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–09–P
In accordance with Section 223 of the
Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2273) the
Department of Labor issued a
Certification of Eligibility to Apply for
Worker Adjustment Assistance and
Alternative Trade Adjustment
Assistance on February 23, 2005,
applicable to workers of Dunmore
Furniture Industries, Plant 1, Hickory,
North Carolina, Dunmore Furniture
Plant 2, Granite Falls, North Carolina
and Dunmore Furniture, Plant 3,
Newton, North Carolina. The notice was
published in the Federal Register on
March 9, 2005 (70 FR 11704).
At the request of the State agency, the
Department reviewed the certification
for workers of the subject firm. The
workers were engaged in the production
of upholstered furniture.
New information shows that prior to
October 2004, the name of the subject
firm was Hat, Inc. a/k/a Dunmore
Furniture Industries and that some
workers separated from employment at
the subject firm had their wages
reported under a separate
unemployment insurance (UI) tax
account for Hat, Inc.
Accordingly, the Department is
amending the certification to properly
reflect this matter.
The intent of the Department’s
certification is to include all workers of
Dunmore Furniture Industries, Plant 1,
Hickory, North Carolina, Dunmore
Furniture, Plant 2, Granite Falls, North
Carolina, and Dunmore Furniture, Plant
3, Newton, North Carolina, who were
adversely affected by increased imports.
The amended notice applicable to
TA–W–56,364, TA–W–56,364A and
TA–W–56,364B is hereby issued as
follows:
All workers of Dunmore Furniture
Industries, a/k/a Hat, Inc., Plant 1, Hickory,
North Carolina (TA–W–56,364), Dunmore
Furniture Industries, a/k/a Hat, Inc., Plant 2,
Granite Falls, North Carolina (TA–W–
56,364A) and Dunmore Furniture Industries,
a/k/a Hat, Inc., Plant 3, Newton, North
VerDate jul<14>2003
19:48 Apr 04, 2005
Jkt 205001
PO 00000
Frm 00036
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
17263
Carolina (TA–W–56,364B), who became
totally or partially separated from
employment on or after January 14, 2004,
through February 23, 2007, are eligible to
apply for adjustment assistance under
Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, and are
also eligible to apply for alternative trade
adjustment assistance under Section 246 of
the Trade Act of 1974.
Signed at Washington, DC, this 29th day of
March 2005.
Linda G. Poole,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade
Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E5–1525 Filed 4–4–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–30–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
[TA–W–56,732]
Eaton; Everett, WA; Notice of
Termination of Investigation
Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade
Act of 1974, as amended, an
investigation was initiated on March 10,
2005 in response to a petition filed by
a company official on behalf of workers
at Eaton, Everett, Washington.
The petitioner has requested that the
petition be withdrawn. Consequently,
the investigation has been terminated.
Signed at Washington, DC, this 24th day of
March, 2005.
Richard Church,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade
Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E5–1530 Filed 4–4–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–30–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
[TA–W–56,365]
Glad Manufacturing; Cartersville, GA;
Notice of Negative Determination
Regarding Application for
Reconsideration
By application of March 2, 2005, a
petitioner requested administrative
reconsideration of the Department’s
negative determination regarding
eligibility for workers and former
workers of the subject firm to apply for
Alternative Trade Adjustment
Assistance (ATAA).
The workers of Glad Manufacturing,
Cartersville, Georgia were certified
eligible to apply for Trade Adjustment
Assistance (TAA) and denied to apply
for ATAA on February 3, 2005. The
E:\FR\FM\05APN1.SGM
05APN1
17264
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 64 / Tuesday, April 5, 2005 / Notices
denial notice was published in the
Federal Register on March 9, 2005 (70
FR 11706).
Pursuant to 29 CFR 90.18(c)
reconsideration may be granted under
the following circumstances:
(1) If it appears on the basis of facts
not previously considered that the
determination complained of was
erroneous;
(2) If it appears that the determination
complained of was based on a mistake
in the determination of facts not
previously considered; or
(3) If in the opinion of the Certifying
Officer, a misinterpretation of facts or of
the law justified reconsideration of the
decision.
The group eligibility criteria for the
ATAA program that the Department
must consider under Section 246 of the
Trade Act are:
1. Whether a significant number of
workers in the workers’ firm are 50
years of age or older.
2. Whether the workers in the
workers’ firm possess skills that are not
easily transferable.
3. The competitive conditions within
the workers’ industry (i.e., conditions
within the industry are adverse).
The initial ATAA investigation
determined that the skills of the subject
worker group are easily transferable to
other positions in the local area.
In the request for reconsideration, the
petitioner alleges that the separated
group of workers who are 50 years and
older includes employees whose skills
are very limited and not easily
transferable to other positions.
The Department conducted additional
investigation and contacted company
official to determine workers’ eligibility
for ATAA. Based on the company
official’s statements it was revealed that
there are several existing and new
manufacturing facilities within the
commuting area, which are in the
process of hiring workers with skills
similar to those possessed by the subject
worker group. Consequently, the
investigation confirmed that workers’
skills are easily transferable to other
companies.
Conclusion
After review of the application and
investigative findings, I conclude that
there has been no error or
misinterpretation of the law or of the
facts which would justify
reconsideration of the Department of
Labor’s prior decision. Accordingly, the
application is denied.
VerDate jul<14>2003
19:48 Apr 04, 2005
Jkt 205001
Signed at Washington, DC, this 22nd day
of March, 2005.
Elliott S. Kushner,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade
Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E5–1526 Filed 4–4–05; 8:45 am]
Signed at Washington, DC, this 25th day of
March, 2005.
Linda G. Poole,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade
Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E5–1527 Filed 4–4–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–30–P
BILLING CODE 4510–30–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
Employment and Training
Administration
[TA–W–51,937 and TA–W–51,937A]
[TA–W–56,808]
Hydro Gate Acquisition Company, Inc.;
Commerce City, CO; Notice of
Termination of Investigation
Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade
Act of 1974, as amended, an
investigation was initiated on March 24,
2005, in response to a worker petition
filed by a company official on behalf of
workers at Hydro Gate Acquisition, Inc.,
Commerce City, Colorado.
The Department issued a certification
regarding eligibility to apply for worker
adjustment assistance and alternative
trade adjustment assistance relating to
the petitioning group of workers on
February 7, 2005 (TA–W–56,352).
Consequently, further investigation
would serve no purpose, and the
investigation has been terminated.
Signed at Washington, DC, this 25th day of
March 2005.
Elliott S. Kushner,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade
Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E5–1529 Filed 4–4–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–30–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
[TA–W–56,683]
Intel Corporation, Hawthorn Farm 1,
Hillsboro, OR; Notice of Termination of
Investigation
Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade
Act of 1974, as amended, an
investigation was initiated on March 4,
2005 in response to a petition filed on
behalf of workers at Intel Corporation,
Hawthorn Farm 1, Hillsboro, Oregon.
The petitioners have requested that
the petition be withdrawn.
Consequently, the investigation has
been terminated.
PO 00000
Frm 00037
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Magnequench UG, Valparaiso, Indiana;
Including an Employee of
Magnequench UG, Valparaiso, Indiana,
Located in Morgan Hills, CA; Amended
Notice of Certification Regarding
Eligibility To Apply for Worker
Adjustment Assistance
In accordance with section 223 of the
Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2273) the
Department of Labor issued a Notice of
Certification Regarding Eligibility to
Apply for Worker Adjustment
Assistance on July 16, 2003, applicable
to workers of Magnequench UG,
Valparaiso, Indiana. The notice was
published in the Federal Register on
August 5, 2003 (68 FR 46231).
At the request of the State agency, the
Department reviewed the certification
for workers of the subject firm. New
information shows that a worker
separation occurred involving an
employee of the Valparaiso, Indiana
facility of Magnequench UG who was
located in Morgan Hills, California. Mr.
James Place provided sales support
services for the production of
permanent magnets at the Valparaiso,
Indiana location of the subject firm.
Based on these findings, the
Department is amending this
certification to include an employee of
the Valparaiso, Indiana facility of
Magnequench UG located in Morgan
Hills, California. The intent of the
Department’s certification is to include
all workers of Magnequench UG,
Valparaiso, Indiana, who were adversely
affected by a shift in production to
Mexico.
The amended notice applicable to
TA–W–51,937 is hereby issued as
follows:
All workers of Magnequench UG,
Valparaiso, Indiana (TA–W–51,937),
including an employee of Magnequench UG,
Valparaiso, Indiana, located in Morgan Hills,
California (TA–W–51,937A), who became
totally or partially separated from
employment on or after May 30, 2002,
through July 16, 2005 are eligible to apply for
adjustment assistance under Section 223 of
the Trade Act of 1974.
E:\FR\FM\05APN1.SGM
05APN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 64 (Tuesday, April 5, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 17263-17264]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E5-1526]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training Administration
[TA-W-56,365]
Glad Manufacturing; Cartersville, GA; Notice of Negative
Determination Regarding Application for Reconsideration
By application of March 2, 2005, a petitioner requested
administrative reconsideration of the Department's negative
determination regarding eligibility for workers and former workers of
the subject firm to apply for Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance
(ATAA).
The workers of Glad Manufacturing, Cartersville, Georgia were
certified eligible to apply for Trade Adjustment Assistance (TAA) and
denied to apply for ATAA on February 3, 2005. The
[[Page 17264]]
denial notice was published in the Federal Register on March 9, 2005
(70 FR 11706).
Pursuant to 29 CFR 90.18(c) reconsideration may be granted under
the following circumstances:
(1) If it appears on the basis of facts not previously considered
that the determination complained of was erroneous;
(2) If it appears that the determination complained of was based on
a mistake in the determination of facts not previously considered; or
(3) If in the opinion of the Certifying Officer, a
misinterpretation of facts or of the law justified reconsideration of
the decision.
The group eligibility criteria for the ATAA program that the
Department must consider under Section 246 of the Trade Act are:
1. Whether a significant number of workers in the workers' firm are
50 years of age or older.
2. Whether the workers in the workers' firm possess skills that are
not easily transferable.
3. The competitive conditions within the workers' industry (i.e.,
conditions within the industry are adverse).
The initial ATAA investigation determined that the skills of the
subject worker group are easily transferable to other positions in the
local area.
In the request for reconsideration, the petitioner alleges that the
separated group of workers who are 50 years and older includes
employees whose skills are very limited and not easily transferable to
other positions.
The Department conducted additional investigation and contacted
company official to determine workers' eligibility for ATAA. Based on
the company official's statements it was revealed that there are
several existing and new manufacturing facilities within the commuting
area, which are in the process of hiring workers with skills similar to
those possessed by the subject worker group. Consequently, the
investigation confirmed that workers' skills are easily transferable to
other companies.
Conclusion
After review of the application and investigative findings, I
conclude that there has been no error or misinterpretation of the law
or of the facts which would justify reconsideration of the Department
of Labor's prior decision. Accordingly, the application is denied.
Signed at Washington, DC, this 22nd day of March, 2005.
Elliott S. Kushner,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E5-1526 Filed 4-4-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-P
