Workforce Investment Act-Demonstration Grants; Solicitation for Grant Applications-Prisoner Re-Entry Initiative, 16853-16870 [05-6484]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 62 / Friday, April 1, 2005 / Notices
16853
ATAA APPENDIX—Continued
[Petitions instituted between 12/06/04 and 3/18/05—Contact: Regina Chapman (202) 693–3547]
Company name
City, state
Date of
application
Date of
institution
Steward .........................................................
Dan River, Inc ...............................................
T.S. Trim Industries, Inc ...............................
Elco (Textron) ...............................................
Nestle Purina Pet Foods ..............................
Douglas Quick-it ...........................................
Pennacle Frames and Accent, Inc ...............
General Electric ............................................
Agilent Tech ..................................................
Conn-Selmer, Inc ..........................................
Kidder, Inc ....................................................
MCS Ind. Inc .................................................
Universal Lighting Tech ................................
BMC Software, Inc .......................................
Chattanooga, TN ..........................................
Ft. Valley, GA ...............................................
Athens, OH ...................................................
Rockford, IL ..................................................
St. Joseph, MO .............................................
Walnut Ranch, AR ........................................
Pigott, AR .....................................................
Jonesboro, AR ..............................................
Fort Collins, CO ............................................
Elkhart, IN .....................................................
Agawam, MA ................................................
Easton, PA ....................................................
Madison, AL ..................................................
Houston, TX ..................................................
Nov. 23, 2004 ...
Dec. 9, 2004 .....
Nov. 10, 2004 ...
Nov. 24, 2004 ...
Jan. 24, 2005 ...
Jan. 26, 2005 ...
Jan. 26, 2005 ...
Jan. 26, 2005 ...
Feb. 3, 2005 .....
Jan. 27, 2005 ...
Jan. 31, 2003 ...
Feb. 3, 2005 .....
Jan. 26, 2005 ...
March 11, 2005
Jan. 4, 2005.
Jan. 24, 2005.
Jan. 24, 2005.
Jan. 24, 2005.
Jan. 26, 2005.
Feb. 9, 2005.
Feb. 9, 2005.
Feb. 9, 2005.
Feb. 9, 2005.
Feb. 9, 2005.
Feb. 9, 2005.
Feb. 9, 2005.
March 3, 2005.
March 15, 2005.
TA–W No.
53,591
53,134
52,448
53,573
52,243
53,754
54,313
52,187
52,429
52,441
51,720
54,257
53,944
53,918
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
[FR Doc. 05–6411 Filed 3–31–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–30–M
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
Workforce Investment Act—
Demonstration Grants; Solicitation for
Grant Applications—Prisoner Re-Entry
Initiative
Announcement Type: New.
Solicitation for Grant Applications.
Funding Opportunity Number: SGA/
DFA PY–04–08.
Catalog of Federal Domestic
Assistance (CFDA) Number: 17.261.
DATES: The closing date for receipt of
applications under this announcement
is July 13, 2005. Applications must be
received no later than 5 p.m. (eastern
time). Application and Submission
information is explained in detail in
Section IV of this SGA.
SUMMARY: The President’s Prisoner Reentry Initiative seeks to strengthen
urban communities characterized by
large numbers of returning prisoners
through an employment-centered
program that incorporates mentoring,
job training, and other comprehensive
transitional services. This program,
which involves several Federal
agencies, is designed to reduce
recidivism by helping inmates find
work when they return to their
communities, as part of an effort to
build a life in the community for
everyone. DOL will be awarding grants
under this competition to faith-based
and community organizations (FBCOs)
to be the agencies carrying out this
demonstration. The Department of
Justice will subsequently award
competitive grants to State agencies to
VerDate jul<14>2003
17:15 Mar 31, 2005
Jkt 205001
provide pre-release services to prisoners
who will be returning to the
communities served by the DOL grants.
The Department of Housing and Urban
Development may in future years
provide funds under this initiative for
housing services and the Department of
Health and Human Services is also
assisting in the design and
implementation of the initiative
regarding substance abuse and mental
health treatment. We hope to serve
6,250 released prisoners during the first
year of this initiative with projects
operating in 30 communities across the
country. Each lead local agency
awarded a DOL grant may choose to
directly provide services to released
prisoners; provide sub-grants to other
FBCOs to provide these services; or use
a mixed approach of providing some
direct services themselves while using
other FBCOs to also provide services.
We expect that most lead local agencies
will need to sub-grant some portion of
their award to other FBCOs. If the lead
local agency is using sub-grantees, it
will be responsible for providing
technical assistance and oversight to
these other FBCOs. Lead local FBCOs
applying for these grants will identify as
part of their application the need in the
community that they plan to serve; their
proposed FBCO sub-grantees; their plan
for serving released prisoners; and their
partnerships with the criminal justice
system, Workforce Investment Board,
housing authority, and mental health
and substance abuse treatment
providers.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Funding Opportunity Description
their communities and families. The
return of these ex-prisoners threatens
the fragile cohesion in many of the most
troubled neighborhoods in America.
Without help, a majority of exprisoners do in fact return to criminal
activity. For example, according to the
U.S. Department of Justice, almost three
out of five returning inmates will be
charged with new crimes within three
years of their release from prison and
two out of five will be re-incarcerated.
Released prisoners face a myriad of
challenges that contribute to a return to
criminal activity, re-arrest, and reincarceration. Joblessness among exprisoners has been broadly linked to
recidivism rates. Statistics demonstrate
that even before incarceration, adult
prisoners demonstrate weak or nonexistent ties to the workforce. Data from
1997 show that nearly one-third of adult
prisoners were unemployed in the
month before their arrest, compared to
seven percent unemployment in the
general population.1 Post-incarceration,
employment rates only get worse—
unemployment among ex-prisoners has
been estimated at between 25 and 40
percent. Likewise, prisoners also
demonstrate low levels of educational
attainment. Nineteen percent of adult
State prisoners are completely illiterate
and 40 percent are functionally
illiterate; 2 over half of State parole
entrants were not high school graduates
and as many as eleven percent had only
an eighth grade education or less.3
Research has also broadly
documented the substance abuse and
mental health issues of ex-prisoners—
factors that are likely to contribute to
poor education levels, un-employability,
1. Background
Experts estimate that each year more
than 600,000 inmates are released from
Federal and State prisons and return to
1 Petersilia, 2002. When Prisoners Come Home:
Parole and Prisoner Reentry.
2 Rubinstien, 2001 as quoted in Petersilia, 2002.
3 Petersilia, 2002.
PO 00000
Frm 00063
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\01APN1.SGM
01APN1
16854
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 62 / Friday, April 1, 2005 / Notices
and a return to criminal activity. A
study of parolees from State prisons in
1999 found that 84 percent had been
using an illegal drug or abusing alcohol
at the time of their offense. One-quarter
had been alcohol dependent and onequarter had been IV drug users.
Fourteen percent had a mental illness
and twelve percent were homeless at the
time of their arrest. In some States,
nearly one-quarter of parole revocations
were related to drug-related violations.4
Estimates of mental illness among the
prison population vary. One study
found that sixteen percent of State
prison and local jail inmates had a
mental illness as did seven percent of
Federal prisoners. Among detainees
with a mental disorder, 72 percent also
had a substance abuse disorder.5 In a
survey of prisoners, one-fourth of male
adults and more than one-third of
female adults reported having been
treated at some time for a mental or
emotional problem.6 Only one-third of
adult male detainees and one-fourth of
females who needed services for severe
mental disorders received treatment in
jail.7
In returning to criminal activity, exprisoners contribute to the presence of
violence and crime in already struggling
neighborhoods and reduce their chances
of living healthy and positive lives and
strengthening their families. Research
indicates that parental loss is related to
a host of poor outcomes for children
that include poverty, drug abuse,
educational failure, criminal behavior,
and premature death. Healthy and
consistent relationships between
parents and children strengthen the
community by positively impacting
both parent and child generations. Exoffenders who maintain strong family
and community ties have greater
success in reintegrating into the
community and avoiding incarceration.8
In order to successfully reintegrate
into the community it is essential that
ex-offenders possess the skills and
support necessary to enter and compete
in the workforce. The Prisoner Re-entry
Initiative is designed to draw on the
unique strengths of faith-based and
4 Hughes, T.A., Wilson, D.J., and Belk, A.J., 2001,
Trends in State Parole, 1990–2000. Bureau of
Justice Statistics, Special Report, NCJ 184735.
5 Ditton, P.M., 1999, Mental Health and
Treatment of Inmates and Probationers,
Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
6 Harlow, C.W., 1998, Profile of Jail Inmates,
1996, Bureau of Justice Statistics Special Report,
Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice,
NCJ164620.
7 Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services
Administration, 2002, Report to Congress on the
Prevention and Treatment of Co-occurring
Substance Abuse Disorders and Mental Disorders.
8 Hairston, 1991; Muston, 1994; Nelson, 1999.
VerDate jul<14>2003
17:15 Mar 31, 2005
Jkt 205001
community-based organizations and to
rely on them as a primary partner for
social service delivery to ex-prisoners
by providing a direct link into the
communities to which they are
returning. It also seeks to coordinate the
provision of these services with
supervision of these released prisoners
to ensure they are held accountable for
their behavior upon release.
Community-based partners are well
suited for this work because they can
provide the resources and infrastructure
that are necessary to intervene in the
lives of returnees and interrupt cycles of
crime and incarceration. This grant will
rely heavily on FBCOs to develop
relationships and ensure connections to
rehabilitation services for the formerly
incarcerated.
In addition, FBCOs will be utilized in
this grant because evidence indicates
that faith-based and community
institutions are among the strongest,
most trusted institutions in the urban
neighborhoods to which the majority of
released inmates will return. Local faithbased and community institutions are a
significant presence, with many
resources at their command—including
buildings, volunteers, and a tradition of
outreach and service.9 Churches,
mosques, temples, and community
centers are especially significant in poor
urban areas where FBCOs have
historically had a strong presence. The
additional trust that many FBCOs have
earned outside urban centers is
invaluable, since collaboration and
communication with public, private and
nonprofit providers and policymakers
are essential to helping those in
resource-poor neighborhoods.
Many FBCOs also possess a proven
ability to work collaboratively with
other service providers and justice
agencies for the delivery of social
services. This is an invaluable asset as
the FBCOs that do remain in poor urban
neighborhoods are typically small and
have limited financial resources. For
them to effectively ensure connections
to job training and social services, it is
critical that they build collaborations
with other public and private
organizations.
A substantial number of inner-city
faith-based and community leaders
already have re-entry programs. This
initiative will help develop and expand
these programs that provide job training,
housing, mentoring and transitional
services that help ex-offenders avoid
recidivism and become contributing
members of their communities.
9 Branch, 2002. Faith and Action: Implementation
of the National Faith-Based Initiative for High-Risk
Youth, Public/Private Ventures.
PO 00000
Frm 00064
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Recognizing the work that has already
been done under initiatives funded by
the U.S. Departments of Justice, Labor,
Housing and Urban Development and
Health and Human Services, this
initiative will complement existing exoffender initiatives for which the data
show positive impacts on rates of
recidivism, employment, and substance
abuse.
2. Objectives
The Prisoner Re-entry Initiative is
designed to strengthen urban
communities through an employmentcentered program that incorporates
mentoring, job training, and other
comprehensive transitional services.
This program seeks to reduce recidivism
by helping inmates find work when they
return to their communities, as part of
an effort to build a life in the
community for everyone. In the local
areas served through this initiative,
FBCOs will provide comprehensive and
coordinated services to ex-offenders in
the following three areas:
• Employment: Employment is a
critical stabilizing factor for ex-offenders
and this initiative will stress job
placement, job retention, and increasing
the earnings potential of released
prisoners. FBCOs will offer job training
and job placement services in
coordination with business, local OneStop Centers, educational institutions,
and other employment providers.
Partnering faith-based and community
organizations will provide each program
participant with work-readiness, soft
skills training, mentoring, job placement
or referral for job placement, and postplacement support. The applicant must
provide educational services and hard
skills training through vouchers. These
services must be provided by
organizations that grant industryrecognized credentials. These vouchers
should be used to supplement the
limited supply of individual training
accounts available through the
workforce system.
• Housing: Because adequate housing
for ex-offenders is an important
component of successful reentry, the
initiative will stress both satisfactory
transitional housing and the movement
from transitional to permanent housing.
Funds are not currently available under
this initiative to provide housing
services for participants, but the grants
will require that linkages be developed
at each site to provide necessary
housing services to participants. Subject
to the availability of appropriations,
Federal funds to provide housing
services may be added to these grants in
future years.
E:\FR\FM\01APN1.SGM
01APN1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 62 / Friday, April 1, 2005 / Notices
• Mentoring: FBCOs will provide
post-release mentoring and other
services essential to reintegrating exoffenders in coordination with the
corrections, parole, and probation
structure. Participating adult exoffenders will be matched with
appropriate mentors who will be
primarily responsible for supporting the
returnee in the community and the work
place. Mentors will offer support,
guidance, and assistance with the many
challenges faced by ex-offenders.
As described above, local FBCOs will
be primarily responsible for ensuring
connections to and delivering services
to program participants to achieve the
main goals of long-term and meaningful
employment, reduction of criminal
involvement, adequate transitional
housing, social connection, mental
health and substance abuse counseling,
and other wraparound support services
as needed. Funds to be awarded by the
Department of Justice under a separate
solicitation will support the activities of
the criminal justice partners, both prerelease and during the time released
prisoners may be under supervision in
the community.
3. Design and Structure of the Initiative
What Is the Overall Structure of This
Initiative?
We hope to serve 6,250 released
prisoners during the first year of this
initiative, with projects operating in 30
communities across the country. Under
this announcement, DOL will be
awarding grants to FBCOs to oversee the
provision of re-entry services in their
community. DOJ subsequently will
award competitive grants to State
agencies to provide pre-release services
for prisoners returning to the
communities that are awarded DOL
grants.
Each lead local agency awarded a
DOL grant may choose to directly
provide services to released prisoners;
provide sub-grants to other FBCOs to
provide these services; or use a mixed
approach of providing some direct
services themselves while using other
FBCOs to also provide services. We
expect that most lead local agencies will
need to sub-grant some portion of their
award to other FBCOs. If the lead local
agency is using sub-grantees, it will be
responsible for providing technical
assistance and oversight to these other
FBCOs.
FBCOs applying for these grants will
identify as part of their application the
need for this Federal support in the
community that they plan to serve; their
FBCO sub-grantees; and their plan for
providing services to released prisoners.
VerDate jul<14>2003
17:15 Mar 31, 2005
Jkt 205001
They must also demonstrate that they
have established partnerships with the
criminal justice system, local Workforce
Investment Board, and the local housing
authority. They must also identify their
plan to leverage other Federal, State, or
local funding, as well as private funding
sources, to provide other wraparound
support services that are not directly
funded through this initiative such as
substance abuse and mental health
treatment.
Who Will Be the Grant Recipients
Under This Initiative?
The recipients of the DOL grants will
be faith-based and community
organizations that are located in or have
a staff presence in the urban community
being served, and that have the capacity
to serve as the lead agency under this
initiative, which in some cases will
mean providing technical assistance and
oversight to other FBCOs.
What Types of Communities Will Be the
Focus of These Grants?
We are looking to award grants in
urban communities that are heavily
impacted by large numbers of prisoners
returning to their community each year,
particularly those affected by high rates
of recidivism. A large metropolitan area
could include more than one
community appropriate for a project
under this initiative. For example, DOL
could award grants to lead FBCOs in
more than one community within the
City of Los Angeles and surrounding
areas. Therefore, you may propose to
serve a sub-area within a larger
metropolitan area or an entire small or
medium-sized city. Given the amount of
funds available and the number of
communities that we expect to serve, we
expect that an average of 200 released
prisoners per community will be served
in the first year.
How Large a Grant Should I Apply for?
We anticipate that FBCOs will receive
grants of approximately $660,000 to
cover their first year of operations. You
may request a larger or smaller amount
based on the size of the community that
you propose to serve, but deviations
from this amount must be clearly
justified in your application.
How Much Money Should the Lead
FBCO Reserve for Providing Program
Administration, Including Technical
Assistance and Oversight of the Small
FBCOs?
Limit the share of funds reserved for
program administration, including
technical assistance and oversight, to 10
percent of the amount for which you are
applying. The remaining funds should
PO 00000
Frm 00065
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
16855
be used to provide services to returning
prisoners. The application should
specify the share of funds the applicant
will use for program administration
versus services.
If the Lead FBCO Is Planning To Make
Sub-grants to Other FBCOs, Does it
Need To Make These Awards
Competitively?
Grantees are required to have written
procurement standards under DOL
regulations (29 CFR 95.44). The
selection of sub-grantees should be
conducted, to the maximum extent
practicable, in a manner designed to
ensure full and open competition (see
29 CFR 95.43). Where a provider is
selected non-competitively, the grantee
must be able to justify why it was not
practicable to compete the selection, in
accordance with its procurement
standards. The fact that the sub-awardee
was identified in the grant application
does not alone suffice to demonstrate
such impracticability. The decision and
justification for a non-competitive
selection is susceptible to questioning
upon audit. DOL procurement
regulations at 29 CFR Part 95 do not
contain standard provisions for noncompetitive selections.
In Preparing Their Applications, How
Much Effort Should FBCOs Put Into
Identifying the Small FBCOs and Local
Partnerships for These Projects?
If you are planning to provide subgrants to others FBCOs, you should use
the three-month application period to
identify and competitively select these
sub-grantees and develop strong
partnerships in the community that you
propose to serve. Depending on your
procurement procedures, this could be
sufficient time for you to conduct a
competition or to otherwise select the
FBCOs that will be your sub-grantees.
Lead FBCOs are expected to
demonstrate connections to the criminal
justice system that will allow referrals of
released prisoners who will be returning
to the community, as well as
coordination with parole and probation
officers. We also encourage lead FBCOs
to use this three-month period to
develop or strengthen partnerships with
the Workforce Investment Board (WIB)
so that program participants will be able
to receive services from local One-Stop
Centers. The application must include
letters of support from the local
Workforce Investment Board and from
cooperating entities in the criminal
justice system. Lead FBCOs should also
demonstrate linkages and cooperative
partnerships with local housing
authorities, substance abuse and mental
health treatment providers, and other
E:\FR\FM\01APN1.SGM
01APN1
16856
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 62 / Friday, April 1, 2005 / Notices
organizations that provide services
necessary to meet the needs of returning
prisoners.
What if Two or More FBCOs Submit
Separate Applications To Serve the
Same Community or Metropolitan Area?
If more than one proposal to serve the
same community or metropolitan area
are rated highly, we will determine
whether the community or metropolitan
area is large enough to support more
than one project.
Can a National or Regional FBCO Apply
To Serve Multiple Metropolitan Areas?
Yes, but you must submit a separate
application for each metropolitan area
that you propose to serve and you must
demonstrate that you have an existing
presence in each metropolitan area for
which you apply. Single proposals
applying to serve multiple metropolitan
areas will not be considered.
Can an FBCO Submit Two or More
Applications For the Same Metropolitan
Area?
We expect that most FBCOs will
propose to serve multiple communities
within a metropolitan area (for example,
different neighborhoods). In most cases,
we expect to receive a single application
covering all communities that are
proposed to be served within a single
metropolitan area. However, for very
large metropolitan areas, you may
choose to submit separate proposals for
distinct communities (e.g., the Bronx
and Brooklyn).
What Is the Target Group To Be Served
Under These Grants?
Generally, grantees should plan to
serve individuals 18 years old and older
who have been convicted as an adult
and imprisoned pursuant to an Act of
Congress or a State law, and who have
never been convicted of a violent or sexrelated offense. Additional information
on eligible beneficiaries is provided in
Section III (1).
What Are Allowable Uses of Grant
Funds?
DOL grant funds can be used to
provide a variety of services to returning
prisoners, including workforce
development services, job training, onthe-job training, work experience, basic
skills remediation, counseling and case
management, mentoring, and other
reentry services. DOL grant funds may
not be used for substance abuse
treatment services. DOL grant funds
should also not be used for pre-release
services other than recruitment,
introductory meetings, orientations, and
other activities necessary to establishing
VerDate jul<14>2003
17:15 Mar 31, 2005
Jkt 205001
program connections with prisoners
prior to their release. The DOJ grant to
State agencies will provide pre-release
services.
Will There Be a Planning Period After
Grant Award?
FBCOs will be allowed up to four
months to put into place their various
local partnerships and to hire staff. The
probability of continuation of grants
beyond the first year will be greatly
reduced for those grantees that do not
begin providing services by the end of
the first four months.
How Will Success Be Measured Under
These Grants?
Four outcome measures will be used
to measure success in these grants:
entered employment rate, employment
retention rate, earnings change, and
recidivism rate. In addition, grantees
will report on a number of leading
indicators that will serve as predictors
of success. Leading indicators will
include: Enrollment rate; participation
in education/training, workforce
preparation, mentoring, and community
service; attainment of degrees and
certificates; reduced substance abuse;
proportion of enrollees in stable
housing; and proportion of enrollees
complying with parole conditions. In
applying for these grants, FBCOs and
their sub-grantees agree to submit
updated Management Information
System (MIS) data on enrollee
characteristics, services provided,
placements, outcomes, and follow-up
status.
Will There Be an Evaluation of This
Initiative?
There will be a formal evaluation of
this initiative. In applying for these
grants, lead FBCOs and their subgrantees agree to cooperate in this
evaluation by providing enrollment and
participation data and other information
during all years of the project and to
participate in a random assignment
evaluation during the third and fourth
years of the project.
4. Guidelines for Technical Proposal
How Should I Organize My Technical
Proposal?
Organize your technical proposal to
answer the questions below. Each
proposal must apply for funds for a
single metropolitan area. The criteria
below will be used to evaluate your
proposal. Points will be deducted from
applications that are not responsive to
these questions. The technical questions
are as follows:
#1. What is the need for the project in
the community to be served by the
PO 00000
Frm 00066
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
grant? (20 points) Identify the need in
the community that you propose to
serve through your grant and make a
case for the need for the project in that
area. Demonstrate how your community
meets the requirement of being an urban
area heavily impacted by high numbers
of returning prisoners and high rates of
recidivism. Use census tract data from
the 2000 census to show the population
of the community, its poverty rate, and
its unemployment rate. Use local law
enforcement data to show the crime rate
and recidivism rate for the community
and how this compares with the State or
county as a whole. If there are particular
neighborhoods within the city in which
you plan to focus this grant, describe
these neighborhoods and provide
available data specific to that area. We
recognize that data might not be readily
available on the number of offenders
returning to your community who have
never committed a violent crime, and so
for the purpose of establishing need (but
not for determining eligibility for
services once the program starts) you
can use data on the number of returning
prisoners whose most recent offense
was non-violent. Use data that is
available from the State to estimate the
number of non-violent offenders
returning each year to your community,
and how this compares to other areas in
the State. If possible, provide such data
for the specific neighborhoods that you
plan to serve rather than county-wide
data. If such data are not available from
your State at the sub-county level, data
on the number of returning non-violent
prisoners by county from the National
Corrections Reporting Program (NCRP)
will be available on ETA’s web page at
www.doleta.gov. Please note, however,
that the list on our web site will only
include the 108 counties with the
largest number of returning prisoners,
and will not include the States of
Alaska, Delaware, Idaho, Massachusetts,
Montana, New Mexico, Rhode Island,
Vermont, and Wyoming. You can apply
to serve a community in a county that
is not on this list. If you are applying
from a community in a county that is
not included, provide the best data that
is available. Applicants will not be
penalized for being in a State that does
not participate in the NCRP reporting
system.
#2. What Is the Project Design and
Service Strategy? (25 points) Describe
the project design and service strategy
for each of the following required
program components.
E:\FR\FM\01APN1.SGM
01APN1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 62 / Friday, April 1, 2005 / Notices
How Do You Plan To Increase the
Employment Opportunities of Released
Prisoners Who You Will Be Serving?
Describe how you will use funds
available under this grant to increase the
employment opportunities of released
prisoners. You and your FBCO subgrantees can directly provide
assessment services, work-readiness
training, job placement, and postplacement support. Vouchers or another
mechanism of choice should be
provided to participants needing
educational services or hard skills
training. These vouchers should be used
to supplement the limited supply of
individual training accounts available
through the workforce investment
system. Educational services and hard
skills training must be provided by
organizations that grant industryrecognized credentials. Discuss how you
will conduct an initial assessment of
each individual’s educational
achievement and employability.
Describe how you will provide job
readiness training for individuals in
your program, and help them explore
career options. Describe the follow-up
services that you will provide to
individuals. Be sure to indicate how
many direct-service staff will be hired
with these grant funds.
Often a condition of release is to find
employment quickly. How will you help
these persons find a job soon after their
release from prison? Describe your use
of job developers and career counselors.
Describe how you will work with
employers to identify and create job
openings for these persons. Discuss
possible ways of building career ladders
into your job placements. Discuss how
you will emphasize a demand-driven
approach in job development, seeking
jobs in high-growth and high-demand
occupations. Describe links to local
One-Stop Centers and service providers
under the Workforce Investment Act in
the urban area that you will serve.
Discuss strategies to ensure that released
offenders have the forms of
identification needed to obtain
employment. Discuss the possibility of
having local employers serve on an
advisory board for you to develop job
placements that are both geared to local
demand occupations and open to exoffenders. Discuss whether you will be
using the Work Opportunity Tax Credit
or Federal Bonding Program in helping
released prisoners find jobs. Discuss the
possible use of on-the-job training
contracts to help place released
prisoners in jobs in which they can
learn a skill. Discuss transitional
employment approaches that allow
persons with little or no labor market
VerDate jul<14>2003
17:15 Mar 31, 2005
Jkt 205001
experience to gradually progress to jobs
with more responsibility and higher
pay. Will you offer Try-Out
Employment packages to employers in
which you pay for the first several
weeks of wages to see if the employee
is going to succeed?
Describe possible links to local
community colleges and trade schools
for individuals seeking job training or to
continue their education in the urban
area that you will be serving. Many
released prisoners will have low reading
levels. How will you increase the
literacy levels of these individuals?
Many released prisoners will also lack
a high school diploma. How will you
assist them to receive a GED or attain a
high school diploma? How do you plan
to increase the employment
opportunities for released prisoners who
have disabilities, including psychiatric,
learning, and developmental
disabilities?
Also discuss how you will make sure
that individuals you serve have
transportation to their work sites. Will
you assist individuals to learn to drive
and get a drivers license? Will you help
individuals resolve warrants for past
driving offenses that may prevent them
from driving now? Also discuss whether
you will pay for work clothes and work
tools to get individuals started in jobs.
Also discuss the sustainability of these
employment activities after Federal
grant funds cease.
How Will You Provide Housing Services
to Released Prisoners?
Funds are not currently available
under this initiative to provide housing
services for participants, but the grants
will require that linkages be developed
in the community to provide necessary
housing services to participants.
Describe potential linkages with local
agencies that provide housing services.
Describe the technical assistance that
you will provide to sub-grantees to help
them develop such linkages. Discuss
potential partnerships to provide both
transitional housing and permanent
housing to released prisoners. Please
note that McKinney Vento Supportive
Housing Program (SHP) transitional and
permanent housing funded through the
Continuum of Care application process
cannot be used for ex-offenders. Discuss
options for assisting released prisoners
who need to put a deposit on an
apartment. Discuss how you will ensure
that appropriate housing services are
provided to released prisoners with
physical and mental disabilities. Please
note that Federal funds to provide
housing services may be available for
these grants in future years. If funds are
made available for these purposes
PO 00000
Frm 00067
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
16857
grantees will be required to expend
funds in accordance with applicable
Department of Housing and Urban
Development regulations.
How Will You Provide Mentoring for
the Released Prisoners Who You Will Be
Serving?
We expect that mentoring will be a
key part of this initiative; that you will
be able to offer mentors to each of the
released prisoners who desire these
services enrolled during the first year;
and that mentors will be provided by
faith-based and community
organizations. Discuss your plans for
providing mentors to released prisoners.
Describe any experience that the lead
FBCO has in operating mentoring
programs or how you will develop this
capacity. If you are using sub-grantees,
describe the experience that your FBCO
sub-grantees have in operating
mentoring programs or how you will
develop this capacity in them. How will
the lead FBCO involve other local faithbased and community organizations in
recruiting mentors for this project? What
training will you provide to mentors?
How will you make sure that
appropriate mentoring is available to
released prisoners with physical and
mental disabilities? How do you plan to
match the released prisoners with
appropriate mentors, taking into
consideration factors such as age,
gender, life experiences, and career
interests? If you plan to make use of
peer mentoring in your program, are you
aware of possible State prohibitions
against ex-offenders associating with
known felons? Do you plan to use
former prisoners that have successfully
reintegrated back into society to mentor
recently released prisoners? Do you
expect to be able to sustain this
mentoring component after Federal
grant funds cease? How will you ensure
that the mentoring programs funded
through this project comply with
Workforce Investment Act and
Establishment Clause guidelines that
restrict Federal funding of inherently
religious activities (worship,
instruction, and proselytizing) and
guarantee program participants’ rights to
free exercise of religion?
How Will You Secure Alcohol and Drug
Treatment and Other Health and Social
Services to Released Prisoners Who
Require Such Assistance?
Provide examples of local
partnerships that you have developed to
secure support services for released
prisoners. Because grant funds cannot
be used to provide alcohol and drug
treatment, give examples of other
resources that are available to provide
E:\FR\FM\01APN1.SGM
01APN1
16858
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 62 / Friday, April 1, 2005 / Notices
such services. Also give examples of
local partnerships you have developed
to provide physical and mental health
services. Many released prisoners will
be under court orders to pay child
support and/or restitution. How will
you assist these individuals in
complying with these court orders?
Discuss whether you will help
individuals open checking accounts at
banks. How will you make sure that you
have mental health services available to
released prisoners who need such
services? Discuss plans for providing
any other social services that you
anticipate that returning prisoners will
need. It is also important to be able to
demonstrate the ability to provide
access to and coordination with
mainstream health, social services, and
employment resources for which nonviolent ex-offenders may be eligible.
These programs include, but are not
limited to, Medicaid, Social Security
Insurance Disability Benefits, Children’s
Health Insurance Program, Temporary
Assistance for Needy Families, Food
Stamps, and services funded through
the Mental Health Block Grant and
Substance Abuse Block Grant,
Workforce Investment Act, and Veterans
Health Care.
#3. How will the lead FBCO and any
sub-grantees work with the criminal
justice system in having released
prisoners referred to the program and in
coordinating program services with
community supervision and law
enforcement agencies? (20 points)
Reentry by its very nature must start
behind the walls of an institution,
whether the institution is a prison, jail,
or halfway house. As a result, a
cooperative partnership with
corrections agencies is a critical
component of this initiative. Applicants
must demonstrate the existence of a
collaboration with corrections agencies
that will:
• Identify potential program
participants prior to release, including a
formalized referral and intake process
from State or Federal prisons, and in
some case, local jails.
• Identify specific needs of those
participating in the program.
• Enable employment with identified
program participants to begin within 6
months after release.
• Facilitate access to corrections
facility for work with offenders prior to
release.
• Coordinate provision of services
and mentoring with community
supervision.
Released offenders often have terms of
post-release supervision that may
include reporting requirements, drug
and/or alcohol treatment, counseling,
VerDate jul<14>2003
17:15 Mar 31, 2005
Jkt 205001
etc. Failure to meet the terms of release
often results in revocation of probation
or parole. A critical component of a
successful application will be a
demonstration of a partnership between
the applicant and local representatives
of law enforcement, including police,
probation and parole, to ensure
coordination and cooperation in
accessing services to fulfill these terms
of release. Please note that restrictions
on pre-release services are discussed in
section I.3.
#4. What is the quality and experience
of your organization to serve as a lead
local agency in overseeing this
initiative? (25 points) Describe your
organization and its qualifications for
serving as the lead local FBCO in this
initiative. How long has your
organization been in existence? What
services and programs has it provided in
the urban area to be served by the grant?
If you are planning to use sub-grantees,
discuss previous instances in which the
organization has overseen or
coordinated the work of other FBCOs.
Discuss previous instances in which the
organization has provided technical
assistance to other FBCOs. Discuss the
experience of the organization in
operating social service programs,
including the results of those programs
(in terms of individual service
outcomes). Discuss any specific
experience relating to working with
community-based and faith-based
organizations. Describe your experience
working with criminal justice agencies.
Describe the qualifications of key staff
persons of your organization who may
work on this project, and their specific
experience relating to this project. Also
describe previous experience of the
organization in operating grants from
either Federal or non-Federal sources.
Describe the fiscal controls in place in
your organization. What is your
organization’s current annual budget?
Discuss how you will provide fiscal
oversight of sub-grantees. Describe your
management plan for overseeing and
providing technical assistance to any
sub-grantees.
If you plan to use sub-grantees,
describe the faith-based and community
organizations that you propose to use
for the project. Describe their experience
in operating workforce and social
service programs and the results of
those programs. Describe any specific
experience operating programs for
persons with alcohol or drug addictions
and persons with psychiatric
disabilities. Describe any specific
experience recruiting or overseeing
mentors, and the number of mentors
they have involved in their programs.
Describe the experience and
PO 00000
Frm 00068
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
qualifications of their staff persons who
may have a role in this project.
#5. What will be the results and costeffectiveness of your project and what
non-Federal funds will you be able to
leverage for the project? (10 points)
Describe the costs of this project in
relation to the expected benefits of
services provided to released prisoners.
For example, compare the costs of
incarceration for a year with your
expected cost-per-participant. Also,
compare your per-participant training
and employment costs with those of
other institutions. Also discuss your
expected performance outcomes (in
terms of entered employment rate,
employment retention rate, earnings
change, and recidivism rate) and your
plan for collecting, tracking, and
reporting data on these outcomes.
Describe any non-Federal funds that you
expect to be able to leverage for this
project.
II. Award Information
What Type of Assistance Instrument
Will Be Awarded Under This Initiative?
Funds will be awarded under this
initiative through grants for an initial
period of one year, with up to three
additional option years depending on
the availability of funds and
demonstrated performance.
What Is the Expected Number of
Awards?
We expect to award grants for 30
projects.
What Is the Total Amount Expected To
Be Awarded Through This
Announcement?
DOL expects to award a total of
$19.84 million in initial grants through
this announcement.
What Is the Expected Amount of
Individual Awards?
DOL expects that initial awards will
average $660,000.
III. Eligibility Information
1. Eligible Applicants
Am I an Eligible Applicant for These
Grants?
You are eligible to apply for the DOL
grants if you are a faith-based or
community-based organization and are
located within or have a staff presence
within the urban community that is the
focus of your grant application. Urban
communities are those that are located
within Urbanized Areas or Urban
Clusters, as designated by the Census
Bureau in the 2000 Census.
National or regional FBCOs may
submit separate proposals for more than
E:\FR\FM\01APN1.SGM
01APN1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 62 / Friday, April 1, 2005 / Notices
one metropolitan area, but applicants
must demonstrate that they have a
presence in each metropolitan area for
which they submit a separate
application for each metropolitan area.
Can an FBCO Be Listed as a Sub-Grantee
in More Than One Application?
Yes, but if an FBCO is listed as a subgrantee in two winning proposals, it
will only be allowed to receive a subgrant award from one grant.
Who Is Eligible To Be Served Under
These Grants?
Individuals 18 years old and older
who have been convicted as an adult
and imprisoned pursuant to an Act of
Congress or a State law, and who have
never been convicted of a violent or sexrelated offense can be served with these
grants. Individuals should be enrolled
in the program within 180 days after
their release from prison or a halfway
house. Up to 10 percent of individuals
served can be enrolled over 180 days
from their prison release. Services may
be provided to individuals who have
been released from prison and are
residing in a halfway house.
Non-violent offenses are those
offenses described in State and Federal
statutes encompassing property crime,
drug offenses, and public order crimes.
Property crimes include, but are not
limited to: Burglary, larceny, motor
vehicle theft, and receiving stolen
property. Drug crimes include, but are
not limited to: Possession of a
controlled substance, trafficking in a
controlled substance, and possession of
drug paraphernalia. Public order
offenses include, but are not limited to:
commercial vice, gambling, animal
cruelty and drinking while intoxicated.
If an FBCO exhausts its supply of
eligible offenders during the course of
the grant period, it may request
approval from the DOL grant officer to
expand its eligible population. Approval
of such a request will require the use of
a validated risk assessment tool and
consideration of the nature of any prior
violent offense in consultation with the
Department of Justice.
This program is subject to the
provisions of the ‘‘Jobs for Veterans
Act,’’ Public Law 107–288, which
provides priority of service to veterans
and spouses of certain veterans for the
receipt of employment, training, and
placement services in any job training
program directly funded, in whole or in
part, by the Department of Labor. Please
note that, to obtain priority of service,
a veteran must meet the program’s
eligibility requirements. ETA Training
and Employment Guidance Letter
(TEGL) No. 5–03 (September 16, 2003)
VerDate jul<14>2003
17:15 Mar 31, 2005
Jkt 205001
provides general guidance on the scope
of the veterans priority statute and its
effect on current employment and
training programs, and additional
guidance is available at the ‘‘Jobs for
Veterans Priority of Services Website’’
(https://www.doleta.gov/programs/
VETS/).
2. Cost Sharing or Matching
Is Cost Sharing or Matching Required
for These Grants?
No, cost sharing or matching is not
required, although leveraging of nonFederal resources is strongly
encouraged. In addition, applicants will
be selected, in part, based on their plans
to tap such resources to support
program activities.
IV. Application and Submission
Information
1. Address To Request Application
Package
This SGA includes all information
and forms needed to apply for this
funding opportunity.
2. Content and Form of Application
Submission
What Are the Content and Form of
Application Submission?
Each application must address one or
more urban communities within a single
metropolitan area. Applicants must
submit an original signed application
and three hard copies to the Department
of Labor. The proposal must consist of
two (2) separate and distinct parts.
Applications that fail to adhere to the
instructions in this section will be
considered non-responsive and will not
be considered.
Part 1 of the proposal is the Cost
Proposal and must include the
following three items:
• The Standard Form (SF) 424,
‘‘Application for Federal Assistance’’
(Appendix A). (also available at https://
www.whitehouse.gov/omb/grants/
sf424.pdf). The SF 424 must clearly
identify the applicant and be signed by
an individual with authority to enter
into a grant agreement. Applicants are
required to have a Dun and Bradstreet
(DUNS) number which is a nine-digit
identification number that uniquely
identifies business entities. To obtain a
DUNS number, access the Web site:
www.dunandbradstreet.com or call 1–
866–705–5711. Applicants must supply
their DUNS number in item #5 of the
new SF–424 issued by OMB (rev. 9–
2003).
• The Budget Information Form SF–
424A (Appendix B). (also available at
https://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/grants/
PO 00000
Frm 00069
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
16859
sf424a.pdf). In preparing the Budget
information form, the applicant must
provide a concise narrative explanation
for each line item to support the request
and should discuss precisely how the
administrative costs support the project
goals. Also provide a detailed back-up
budget that includes the number of staff
to be hired by job title.
The Equal Employment Opportunity
Survey Form (Appendix C) is an
optional part of the Cost Proposal.
Part 2 of the application is the
Technical Proposal, which demonstrates
the applicant’s capabilities to plan and
implement the Prisoner Reentry
Initiative grant project in accordance
with the provisions of this solicitation.
The guidelines for the content of the
Technical Proposal are provided in
Section I(4) of this SGA. The Technical
Proposal is limited to twenty (20)
double-spaced single-sided pages with
12 point text font and one-inch margins.
In addition, the applicant must provide
letters of support from the criminal
justice agencies which will release the
prisoners and supervise their release in
the community and the local Workforce
Investment Board; a list of proposed
staff positions to be funded by the grant;
a Time Line outlining project activities;
and a two-page Executive Summary.
These additional materials do not count
against the 20-page limit for the
Technical proposal, but may not exceed
fifteen (15) pages.
3. Submissions Dates, Times, and
Address
Will There Be Informational
Conferences for Organizations Planning
To Apply?
There will be three information
conferences held for this grant
competition. The dates and locations of
these information conferences will be
posted concurrently on ETA’s Web site
at https://www.doleta.gov and DOJ’s Web
site at https://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/rentry.
For potential applicants who cannot
attend one of these conferences, a tape
of the first conference will be available
on both Web sites.
What Is the Closing Date for
Applications?
The closing date for receipt of
applications under this announcement
is July 13, 2005. Applications must be
received at the address below no later
than 5 p.m. (eastern time). Applications
sent by e-mail, telegram, or facsimile
(fax) will not be accepted. Applications
that do not meet the conditions set forth
in this notice will not be considered. No
exceptions to the mailing and delivery
E:\FR\FM\01APN1.SGM
01APN1
16860
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 62 / Friday, April 1, 2005 / Notices
requirements set forth in this notice will
be granted.
To What Address Should I Send My
Application?
Mailed applications must be
addressed to the U.S. Department of
Labor, Employment and Training
Administration, Division of Federal
Assistance, Attention: Eric D.
Luetkenhaus, Reference SGA/DFA
PY04–08, 200 Constitution Avenue,
NW., Room N–4438, Washington, DC
20210. Applicants are advised that mail
delivery in the Washington area may be
delayed due to mail decontamination
procedures. Hand delivered proposals
will be received at the above address.
All overnight mail will be considered to
be hand-delivered and must be received
at the designated place by the specified
closing date.
Applicants may apply online at
https://www.grants.gov. Any application
received after the deadline will not be
accepted. For applicants submitting
electronic applications via Grants.gov, it
is strongly recommended that you
immediately initiate and complete the
‘‘Get Started’’ steps to register with
Grants.gov at https://www.grants.gov/
GetStarted. These steps will probably
take multiple days to complete which
should be factored in to your plans for
electronic application submission in
order to avoid facing unexpected delays
that could result in the rejection of your
application.
Late Applications: Any application
received after the exact date and time
specified for receipt at the office
designated in this notice will not be
considered, unless it is received before
awards are made and it (a) was sent by
U.S. Postal Service registered or
certified mail not later than the fifth
calendar day before the date specified
for receipt of applications (that is, no
later than July 8, 2005) or (b) was sent
by U.S. Postal Service Express Mail or
Online to addressee not later than 5
p.m. at the place of mailing or electronic
submission one working day prior to the
date specified for receipt of applications
(that is, no later than July 12, 2005). It
is highly recommended that online
submissions be completed one working
day prior to the date specified for
receipt of applications to ensure that the
applicant still has the option to submit
by U.S. Postal Service Express Mail in
the event of any electronic submission
problems. ‘‘Post marked’’ means a
printed, stamped or otherwise placed
impression (exclusive of a postage meter
machine impression) that is readily
identifiable, without further action, as
having been supplied or affixed on the
date of mailing by an employee of the
VerDate jul<14>2003
17:15 Mar 31, 2005
Jkt 205001
U.S. Postal Service. Therefore,
applicants should request the postal
clerk to place a legible hand
cancellation ‘‘bull’s eye’’ postmark on
both the receipt and the package.
Failure to adhere to the above
instructions will be a basis for a
determination of nonresponsiveness.
4. Intergovernmental Review
Is an Intergovernmental Review
Required?
This funding opportunity is not
subject to Executive Order (EO) 12372,
‘‘Intergovernmental Review of Federal
Programs.’’
5. Funding Restrictions
Are There Funding Restrictions?
All proposal costs must be necessary
and reasonable in accordance with
Federal guidelines. Determinations of
allowable costs will be made in
accordance with the applicable Federal
cost principles, e.g., 29 CFR 95.27; NonProfit Organizations—OMB Circular A–
122. Disallowed costs are those charges
to a grant that the grantor agency or its
representative determines not to be
allowed in accordance with the
applicable Federal Cost Principles or
other conditions contained in the grant.
Applicants will not be entitled to
reimbursement of pre-award costs.
The government is prohibited from
providing direct support to religious
activity.10 See 29 CFR part 2, subpart D.
Provision relating to the use of indirect
support (such as through vouchers) are
at 29 CFR 2.33(c) and 20 CFR 667.266.
These grants may not be used to directly
support religious instruction, worship,
prayer, proselytizing or other inherently
religious practices. Neutral, secular
criteria that neither favor nor disfavor
religion must be employed in the
selection of grant and sub-grant
recipients. In addition, under the WIA
and DOL regulations implementing the
Workforce Investment Act, a recipient
may not use direct Federal assistance to
train a participant in religious activities,
or employ participants to construct,
operate, or maintain any part of a
facility that is used or to be used for
religious instruction or worship. See 29
CFR 37.6(f). Under WIA, ‘‘no individual
shall be excluded from participation in,
denied the benefits of, subjected to
discrimination under, or denied
10 The term ‘‘direct’’ support is used to describe
funds or other support that are provided ‘‘directly’’
by a governmental entity or an intermediate
organization with the same duties as a
governmental entity, as opposed to funds that an
organization receives ‘‘indirectly’’ as the result of
the genuine and independent private choice of a
beneficiary within the meaning of the
Establishment Clause of the U.S. Constitution.
PO 00000
Frm 00070
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
employment in the administration of or
in connection with, any such program
or activity because of race, color,
religion, sex (except as otherwise
permitted under Title IX of the
Education Amendments of 1972),
national origin, age, disability, or
political affiliation or belief.’’
DOL grant funds should not be used
for pre-release services other than
recruitment, introductory meetings,
orientations, and other activities
necessary to establishing program
connections with prisoners prior to their
release. This restriction on pre-release
services does not apply to halfway
houses. Additionally, grant funds
should not be used to provide substance
abuse treatment. Such treatment should
be made available to persons enrolled in
the program using resources available
through partnerships with other
agencies.
6. Other Submission Requirements
Can Applications Be Withdrawn?
Applications may be withdrawn by
written notice or telegram (including
mailgram) received at any time before
an award is made. Applications may be
withdrawn in person by the applicant or
by an authorized representative thereof,
if the representative’s identity is made
known and the representative signs a
receipt for the proposal.
V. Application Review Information
1. Criteria for Review
What Will Be the Criteria for Award?
Panelists will rate proposals based on
the following criteria, which are
explained in detail in Section I(4) of this
SGA.
(1) Need in the city and
neighborhoods to be served (20 points);
(2) Project design and service strategy,
including sustainability (25 points);
(3) Connections to the criminal justice
system for referring prisoners to the
program and coordinating services upon
release (20 points);
(4) Quality and experience of lead
FBCO, including ability to manage the
project (25 points);
(5) Cost-effectiveness and leveraging
of non-Federal resources (10 points).
2. Review and Selection Process
How Will Applications Be Reviewed
and Selected?
Proposals that are timely and
responsive to the requirements of this
SGA will be rated against the criteria
listed above by an independent panel
comprised of representatives from DOL,
DOJ, HUD, and HHS. The panel
recommendations to the Grant Officer
E:\FR\FM\01APN1.SGM
01APN1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 62 / Friday, April 1, 2005 / Notices
are advisory in nature. The Grant Officer
may consider any information that
comes to his or her attention. Final
award decisions will be based on the
best interests of the government,
including consideration of geographic
balance, program balance, and diversity.
The Department may elect to award
grants either with or without
discussions with the applicant. In
situations without discussion, an award
will be based on the applicant’s
signature on the SF 424, which
constitutes a binding offer.
VI. Award Administration Information
1. Award Notices
Award Notices—All award
notifications will be made by mail and
posted on the ETA home page at
https://www.doleta.gov. Non-selected
applicants will be notified by mail.
2. Administrative and National Policy
Requirements
All grantees, including faith-based
organizations, will be subject to all
applicable Federal laws (including
provisions of appropriation laws),
regulations, and the applicable Office of
Management and Budget (OMB)
Circulars. The grant(s) awarded under
this SGA must comply with all
provisions of this solicitation and will
be subject to the following
administrative standards and
provisions, as applicable to the
particular grantee:
a. 20 Code of Federal Regulations
(CFR) Part 667.220. (Administrative
Costs).
b. Non-Profit Organizations—Office of
Management and Budget (OMB)
Circulars A–122 (Cost Principles) and
29 CFR Part 95 (Administrative
Requirements).
c. Educational Institutions—OMB
Circulars A–21 (Cost Principles) and 29
CFR Part 95 (Administrative
Requirements).
d. All entities must comply with 29
CFR Parts 93 and 98, and, where
applicable, 29 CFR Parts 96 and 99.
e. In accordance with Section 18 of
the Lobbying Disclosure Act of 1995,
Public Law 104–65 (2 U.S.C. 1611) nonprofit entities incorporated under
Internal Revenue Service Code section
501(c)(4) that engage in lobbying
activities are not eligible to receive
Federal funds and grants.
f. 29 CFR part 2, subpart D—Equal
Treatment in Department of Labor
Programs for Religious Organizations;
Protection of Religious Liberty of
VerDate jul<14>2003
17:15 Mar 31, 2005
Jkt 205001
16861
Department of Labor Social Service
Providers and Beneficiaries;
g. 29 CFR part 30—Equal Employment
Opportunity in Apprenticeship and
Training;
h. 29 CFR part 31—
Nondiscrimination in Federally
Assisted Programs of the Department of
Labor—Effectuation of Title VI of the
Civil Rights Act of 1964;
i. 29 CFR part 32—Nondiscrimination
on the Basis of Handicap in Programs
and Activities Receiving or Benefiting
from Federal Financial Assistance;
j. 29 CFR part 33—Enforcement of
Nondiscrimination on the Basis of
Handicap in Programs or Activities
Conducted by the Department of Labor;
k. 29 CFR part 35—Nondiscrimination
on the Basis of Age in Programs or
Activities Receiving Federal Financial
Assistance from the Department of
Labor;
l. 29 CFR part 36—Nondiscrimination
on the Basis of Sex in Education
Programs or Activities Receiving
Federal Financial Assistance;
m. 29 CFR part 37—Implementation
of the Nondiscrimination and Equal
Opportunity Provisions of the
Workforce Investment Act of 1998
(WIA).
requirements. The quarterly progress
report should be in narrative form and
should include:
1. In-depth information on
accomplishments, including project
success stories, upcoming grant
activities, and promising approaches
and processes.
2. Progress toward performance
outcomes, including updates on
product, curricula, and training
development.
MIS Reports. FBCOs and their subgrantees will be required to submit
updated MIS data on enrollment,
services provided, placements,
outcomes, and follow-up status. A
government-procured MIS system will
be provided to all grantees. Grantees
will be required to have industrystandard computer hardware and highspeed Internet access in order to use the
MIS system. Grant funds may be used
with the prior approval of the Grant
Officer to upgrade computer hardware
and Internet access to enable projects to
use the MIS system.
Quarterly financial reports, quarterly
progress reports, and MIS data will all
be provided electronically.
Note: Except as specifically provided in
this Notice, DOL/ETA’s acceptance of a
proposal and an award of Federal funds to
sponsor any programs(s) does not provide a
waiver of any grant requirements and/or
procedures.
Any questions regarding this SGA
should be faxed to Kevin Brumback,
Grants Management Specialist, Division
of Federal Assistance, FAX number
(202) 693–2705. (This is not a toll-free
number). You must specifically address
your FAX to the attention of Kevin
Brumback and should include SGA/
DFA PY 04–08, a contact name, fax and
phone number.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Please contact Kevin Brumback, Grants
Management Specialist, Division of
Federal Assistance, on (202) 693–3381.
(This is not a toll-free number). This
announcement is also being made
available on the ETA Web site at
https://www.doleta.gov/sga/sga.cfm and
https://www.grants.gov.
3. Reporting
What Reporting Will Be Required Under
These Grants?
The grantee is required to provide the
reports and documents listed below:
Quarterly Financial Reports. A
Quarterly Financial Status Report (SF
269) is required until such time as all
funds have been expended or the grant
period has expired. Quarterly reports
are due 30 days after the end of each
calendar year quarter. Grantees must use
ETA’s On-Line Electronic Reporting
System.
Quarterly Progress Reports. The
grantee must submit a quarterly progress
report to the designated Federal Project
Officer within 30 days after the end of
each quarter. Two copies are to be
submitted providing a detailed account
of activities undertaken during that
quarter. DOL may require additional
data elements to be collected and
reported on either a regular basis or
special request basis. Grantees must
agree to meet DOL reporting
PO 00000
Frm 00071
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
VII. Agency Contacts
Signed in Washington, DC, this 29th day of
March, 2005.
Eric D. Luetkenhaus,
Grant Officer, Employment and Training
Administration.
Appendix A: SF–424 Application for Federal
Assistance
Appendix B: SF–424A Budget Form
Appendix C: OMB Survey N. 1890–0014:
Survey on Ensuring Equal Opportunity for
Applicants
BILLING CODE 4510–30–P
E:\FR\FM\01APN1.SGM
01APN1
16862
17:15 Mar 31, 2005
Jkt 205001
PO 00000
Frm 00072
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\01APN1.SGM
01APN1
EN01AP05.005
VerDate jul<14>2003
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 62 / Friday, April 1, 2005 / Notices
VerDate jul<14>2003
17:15 Mar 31, 2005
Jkt 205001
PO 00000
Frm 00073
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\01APN1.SGM
01APN1
16863
EN01AP05.006
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 62 / Friday, April 1, 2005 / Notices
16864
17:15 Mar 31, 2005
Jkt 205001
PO 00000
Frm 00074
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\01APN1.SGM
01APN1
EN01AP05.007
VerDate jul<14>2003
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 62 / Friday, April 1, 2005 / Notices
VerDate jul<14>2003
17:15 Mar 31, 2005
Jkt 205001
PO 00000
Frm 00075
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\01APN1.SGM
01APN1
16865
EN01AP05.008
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 62 / Friday, April 1, 2005 / Notices
16866
17:15 Mar 31, 2005
Jkt 205001
PO 00000
Frm 00076
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\01APN1.SGM
01APN1
EN01AP05.009
VerDate jul<14>2003
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 62 / Friday, April 1, 2005 / Notices
VerDate jul<14>2003
17:15 Mar 31, 2005
Jkt 205001
PO 00000
Frm 00077
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\01APN1.SGM
01APN1
16867
EN01AP05.010
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 62 / Friday, April 1, 2005 / Notices
16868
17:15 Mar 31, 2005
Jkt 205001
PO 00000
Frm 00078
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\01APN1.SGM
01APN1
EN01AP05.011
VerDate jul<14>2003
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 62 / Friday, April 1, 2005 / Notices
VerDate jul<14>2003
17:15 Mar 31, 2005
Jkt 205001
PO 00000
Frm 00079
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\01APN1.SGM
01APN1
16869
EN01AP05.012
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 62 / Friday, April 1, 2005 / Notices
16870
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 62 / Friday, April 1, 2005 / Notices
[FR Doc. 05–6484 Filed 3–31–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–30–C
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment Standards
Administration; Wage and Hour
Division
Minimum Wages for Federal and
Federally Assisted Construction;
General Wage Determination Decisions
General wage determination decisions
of the Secretary of Labor are issued in
accordance with applicable law and are
based on the information obtained by
the Department of Labor from its study
of local wage conditions and data made
available from other sources. They
specify the basic hourly wage rates and
fringe benefits which are determined to
be prevailing for the described classes of
laborers and mechanics employed on
construction projects of a similar
character and in the localities specified
therein.
The determinations in these decisions
of prevailing rates and fringe benefits
have been made in accordance with 29
CFR part 1, by authority of the Secretary
of Labor pursuant to the provisions of
the Davis-Bacon Act of March 3, 1931,
as amended (46 Stat. 1494, as amended,
40 U.S.C. 276a) and of other Federal
statutes referred to in 29 CFR Part 1,
Appendix, as well as such additional
statutes as may from time to time be
enacted containing provisions for the
payment of wages determined to be
prevailing by the Secretary of Labor in
accordance with the Davis-Bacon Act.
The prevailing rates and fringe benefits
determined in these decisions shall, in
accordance with the provisions of the
foregoing statutes, constitute the
minimum wages payable on Federal and
federally assisted construction projects
to laborers and mechanics of the
specified classes engaged on contract
work of the character and in the
localities described therein.
Good cause is hereby found for not
utilizing notice and public comment
procedure thereon prior to the issuance
of these determinations as prescribed in
5 U.S.C. 553 and not providing for delay
in the effective date as prescribed in that
section, because the necessity to issue
current construction industry wage
determinations frequently and in large
volume causes procedures to be
impractical and contrary to the public
interest.
General wage determination
decisions, and modifications and
supersedeas decisions thereto, contain
no expiration dates and are effective
from the date of notice in the Federal
VerDate jul<14>2003
17:15 Mar 31, 2005
Jkt 205001
Register, or on the date written notice
is received by the agency, whichever is
earlier. These decisions are to be used
in accordance with the provisions of 29
CFR parts 1 and 5, Accordingly, the
applicable decision, together with any
modifications issued, must be made a
part of every contract for performance of
the described work within the
geographic area indicated as required by
an applicable Federal prevailing wage
law and 29 CFR part 5. The wage rates
and fringe benefits, notice of which is
published herein, and which are
contained in the Government Printing
Office (GPO) document entitled
‘‘General Wage Determinations Issued
Under the Davis-Bacon and Related
Acts,’’ shall be the minimum paid by
contractors and subcontractors to
laborers and mechanics.
Any person, organization, or
governmental agency having an interest
in the rates determined as prevailing is
encouraged to submit wage rate and
fringe benefit information for
consideration by the Department.
Further information and selfexplanatory forms for the purpose of
submitting this data may be obtained by
writing to the U.S. Department of Labor,
Employment Standards Administration,
Wage and Hour Division, Division of
Wage Determinations, 200 Constitution
Avenue, NW., Room S–3014,
Washington, DC 20210.
Modification to General Wage
Determination Decisions
The number of decisions listed to the
Government Printing Office document
entitled ‘‘General Wage Determinations
Issued Under the Davis-Bacon and
Related Acts’’ being modified are listed
by Volume and State. Dates of
publication in the Federal Register are
in parentheses following the decision
being modified.
Volume I
Massachusetts
MA20030001 (Jun. 13, 2003)
MA20030002 (Jun. 13, 2003)
MA20030003 (Jun. 13, 2003)
MA20030004 (Jun. 13, 2003)
MA20030017 (Jun. 13, 2003)
MA20030018 (Jun. 13, 2003)
MA20030020 (Jun. 13, 2003)
MA20030021 (Jun. 13, 2003)
New York
NY20030002 (Jun. 13, 2003)
NY20030004 (Jun. 13, 2003)
NY20030005 (Jun. 13, 2003)
NY20030007 (Jun. 13, 2003)
NY20030008 (Jun. 13, 2003)
NY20030018 (Jun. 13, 2003)
NY20030021 (Jun. 13, 2003)
NY20030022 (Jun. 13, 2003)
NY20030025 (Jun. 13, 2003)
NY20030026 (Jun. 13, 2003)
NY20030031 (Jun. 13, 2003)
PO 00000
Frm 00080
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
NY20030032 (Jun. 13, 2003)
NY20030037 (Jun. 13, 2003)
NY20030040 (Jun. 13, 2003)
NY20030044 (Jun. 13, 2003)
NY20030048 (Jun. 13, 2003)
NY20030060 (Jun. 13, 2003)
NY20030072 (Jun. 13, 2003)
Rhode Island
RI20030001 (Jun. 13, 2003)
Volume II
District of Columbia
DC20030001 (Jun. 13, 2003)
DC20030003 (Jun. 13, 2003)
Maryland
MD20030001 (Jun. 13, 2003)
MD20030009 (Jun. 13, 2003)
MD20030021 (Jun. 13, 2003)
MD20030029 (Jun. 13, 2003)
MD20030034 (Jun. 13, 2003)
MD20030036 (Jun. 13, 2003)
MD20030037 (Jun. 13, 2003)
MD20030042 (Jun. 13, 2003)
MD20030048 (Jun. 13, 2003)
MD20030056 (Jun. 13, 2003)
MD20030057 (Jun. 13, 2003)
MD20030058 (Jun. 13, 2003)
Pennsylvania
PA20030001 (Jun. 13, 2003)
PA20030003 (Jun. 13, 2003)
PA20030004 (Jun. 13, 2003)
PA20030013 (Jun. 13, 2003)
PA20030014 (Jun. 13, 2003)
PA20030018 (Jun. 13, 2003)
PA20030033 (Jun. 13, 2003)
PA20030040 (Jun. 13, 2003)
PA20030041 (Jun. 13, 2003)
PA20030042 (Jun. 13, 2003)
PA20030065 (Jun. 13, 2003)
Virginia
VA20030052 (Jun. 13, 2003)
VA20030076 (Jun. 13, 2003)
VA20030078 (Jun. 13, 2003)
VA20030079 (Jun. 13, 2003)
VA20030080 (Jun. 13, 2003)
VA20030084 (Jun. 13, 2003)
VA20030092 (Jun. 13, 2003)
VA20030099 (Jun. 13, 2003)
West Virginia
WV20030002 (Jun. 13, 2003)
WV20030003 (Jun. 13, 2003)
WV20030006 (Jun. 13, 2003)
WV20030009 (Jun. 13, 2003)
WV20030010 (Jun. 13, 2003)
Volume III
Kentucky
KY20030004 (Jun. 13, 2003)
KY20030007 (Jun. 13, 2003)
KY20030027 (Jun. 13, 2003)
KY20030028 (Jun. 13, 2003)
KY20030029 (Jun. 13, 2003)
KY20030034 (Jun. 13, 2003)
Volume IV
Indiana
IN20030001 (Jun. 13, 2003)
IN20030002 (Jun. 13, 2003)
IN20030003 (Jun. 13, 2003)
IN20030004 (Jun. 13, 2003)
IN20030005 (Jun. 13, 2003)
IN20030006 (Jun. 13, 2003)
IN20030007 (Jun. 13, 2003)
IN20030010 (Jun. 13, 2003)
IN20030011 (Jun. 13, 2003)
IN20030012 (Jun. 13, 2003)
IN20030014 (Jun. 13, 2003)
E:\FR\FM\01APN1.SGM
01APN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 62 (Friday, April 1, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 16853-16870]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-6484]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training Administration
Workforce Investment Act--Demonstration Grants; Solicitation for
Grant Applications--Prisoner Re-Entry Initiative
Announcement Type: New. Solicitation for Grant Applications.
Funding Opportunity Number: SGA/DFA PY-04-08.
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance (CFDA) Number: 17.261.
DATES: The closing date for receipt of applications under this
announcement is July 13, 2005. Applications must be received no later
than 5 p.m. (eastern time). Application and Submission information is
explained in detail in Section IV of this SGA.
SUMMARY: The President's Prisoner Re-entry Initiative seeks to
strengthen urban communities characterized by large numbers of
returning prisoners through an employment-centered program that
incorporates mentoring, job training, and other comprehensive
transitional services. This program, which involves several Federal
agencies, is designed to reduce recidivism by helping inmates find work
when they return to their communities, as part of an effort to build a
life in the community for everyone. DOL will be awarding grants under
this competition to faith-based and community organizations (FBCOs) to
be the agencies carrying out this demonstration. The Department of
Justice will subsequently award competitive grants to State agencies to
provide pre-release services to prisoners who will be returning to the
communities served by the DOL grants. The Department of Housing and
Urban Development may in future years provide funds under this
initiative for housing services and the Department of Health and Human
Services is also assisting in the design and implementation of the
initiative regarding substance abuse and mental health treatment. We
hope to serve 6,250 released prisoners during the first year of this
initiative with projects operating in 30 communities across the
country. Each lead local agency awarded a DOL grant may choose to
directly provide services to released prisoners; provide sub-grants to
other FBCOs to provide these services; or use a mixed approach of
providing some direct services themselves while using other FBCOs to
also provide services. We expect that most lead local agencies will
need to sub-grant some portion of their award to other FBCOs. If the
lead local agency is using sub-grantees, it will be responsible for
providing technical assistance and oversight to these other FBCOs. Lead
local FBCOs applying for these grants will identify as part of their
application the need in the community that they plan to serve; their
proposed FBCO sub-grantees; their plan for serving released prisoners;
and their partnerships with the criminal justice system, Workforce
Investment Board, housing authority, and mental health and substance
abuse treatment providers.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Funding Opportunity Description
1. Background
Experts estimate that each year more than 600,000 inmates are
released from Federal and State prisons and return to their communities
and families. The return of these ex-prisoners threatens the fragile
cohesion in many of the most troubled neighborhoods in America.
Without help, a majority of ex-prisoners do in fact return to
criminal activity. For example, according to the U.S. Department of
Justice, almost three out of five returning inmates will be charged
with new crimes within three years of their release from prison and two
out of five will be re-incarcerated.
Released prisoners face a myriad of challenges that contribute to a
return to criminal activity, re-arrest, and re-incarceration.
Joblessness among ex-prisoners has been broadly linked to recidivism
rates. Statistics demonstrate that even before incarceration, adult
prisoners demonstrate weak or non-existent ties to the workforce. Data
from 1997 show that nearly one-third of adult prisoners were unemployed
in the month before their arrest, compared to seven percent
unemployment in the general population.\1\ Post-incarceration,
employment rates only get worse--unemployment among ex-prisoners has
been estimated at between 25 and 40 percent. Likewise, prisoners also
demonstrate low levels of educational attainment. Nineteen percent of
adult State prisoners are completely illiterate and 40 percent are
functionally illiterate; \2\ over half of State parole entrants were
not high school graduates and as many as eleven percent had only an
eighth grade education or less.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Petersilia, 2002. When Prisoners Come Home: Parole and
Prisoner Reentry.
\2\ Rubinstien, 2001 as quoted in Petersilia, 2002.
\3\ Petersilia, 2002.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Research has also broadly documented the substance abuse and mental
health issues of ex-prisoners--factors that are likely to contribute to
poor education levels, un-employability,
[[Page 16854]]
and a return to criminal activity. A study of parolees from State
prisons in 1999 found that 84 percent had been using an illegal drug or
abusing alcohol at the time of their offense. One-quarter had been
alcohol dependent and one-quarter had been IV drug users. Fourteen
percent had a mental illness and twelve percent were homeless at the
time of their arrest. In some States, nearly one-quarter of parole
revocations were related to drug-related violations.\4\ Estimates of
mental illness among the prison population vary. One study found that
sixteen percent of State prison and local jail inmates had a mental
illness as did seven percent of Federal prisoners. Among detainees with
a mental disorder, 72 percent also had a substance abuse disorder.\5\
In a survey of prisoners, one-fourth of male adults and more than one-
third of female adults reported having been treated at some time for a
mental or emotional problem.\6\ Only one-third of adult male detainees
and one-fourth of females who needed services for severe mental
disorders received treatment in jail.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ Hughes, T.A., Wilson, D.J., and Belk, A.J., 2001, Trends in
State Parole, 1990-2000. Bureau of Justice Statistics, Special
Report, NCJ 184735.
\5\ Ditton, P.M., 1999, Mental Health and Treatment of Inmates
and Probationers, Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
\6\ Harlow, C.W., 1998, Profile of Jail Inmates, 1996, Bureau of
Justice Statistics Special Report, Washington, DC: U.S. Department
of Justice, NCJ164620.
\7\ Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration,
2002, Report to Congress on the Prevention and Treatment of Co-
occurring Substance Abuse Disorders and Mental Disorders.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In returning to criminal activity, ex-prisoners contribute to the
presence of violence and crime in already struggling neighborhoods and
reduce their chances of living healthy and positive lives and
strengthening their families. Research indicates that parental loss is
related to a host of poor outcomes for children that include poverty,
drug abuse, educational failure, criminal behavior, and premature
death. Healthy and consistent relationships between parents and
children strengthen the community by positively impacting both parent
and child generations. Ex-offenders who maintain strong family and
community ties have greater success in reintegrating into the community
and avoiding incarceration.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ Hairston, 1991; Muston, 1994; Nelson, 1999.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In order to successfully reintegrate into the community it is
essential that ex-offenders possess the skills and support necessary to
enter and compete in the workforce. The Prisoner Re-entry Initiative is
designed to draw on the unique strengths of faith-based and community-
based organizations and to rely on them as a primary partner for social
service delivery to ex-prisoners by providing a direct link into the
communities to which they are returning. It also seeks to coordinate
the provision of these services with supervision of these released
prisoners to ensure they are held accountable for their behavior upon
release.
Community-based partners are well suited for this work because they
can provide the resources and infrastructure that are necessary to
intervene in the lives of returnees and interrupt cycles of crime and
incarceration. This grant will rely heavily on FBCOs to develop
relationships and ensure connections to rehabilitation services for the
formerly incarcerated.
In addition, FBCOs will be utilized in this grant because evidence
indicates that faith-based and community institutions are among the
strongest, most trusted institutions in the urban neighborhoods to
which the majority of released inmates will return. Local faith-based
and community institutions are a significant presence, with many
resources at their command--including buildings, volunteers, and a
tradition of outreach and service.\9\ Churches, mosques, temples, and
community centers are especially significant in poor urban areas where
FBCOs have historically had a strong presence. The additional trust
that many FBCOs have earned outside urban centers is invaluable, since
collaboration and communication with public, private and nonprofit
providers and policymakers are essential to helping those in resource-
poor neighborhoods.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ Branch, 2002. Faith and Action: Implementation of the
National Faith-Based Initiative for High-Risk Youth, Public/Private
Ventures.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Many FBCOs also possess a proven ability to work collaboratively
with other service providers and justice agencies for the delivery of
social services. This is an invaluable asset as the FBCOs that do
remain in poor urban neighborhoods are typically small and have limited
financial resources. For them to effectively ensure connections to job
training and social services, it is critical that they build
collaborations with other public and private organizations.
A substantial number of inner-city faith-based and community
leaders already have re-entry programs. This initiative will help
develop and expand these programs that provide job training, housing,
mentoring and transitional services that help ex-offenders avoid
recidivism and become contributing members of their communities.
Recognizing the work that has already been done under initiatives
funded by the U.S. Departments of Justice, Labor, Housing and Urban
Development and Health and Human Services, this initiative will
complement existing ex-offender initiatives for which the data show
positive impacts on rates of recidivism, employment, and substance
abuse.
2. Objectives
The Prisoner Re-entry Initiative is designed to strengthen urban
communities through an employment-centered program that incorporates
mentoring, job training, and other comprehensive transitional services.
This program seeks to reduce recidivism by helping inmates find work
when they return to their communities, as part of an effort to build a
life in the community for everyone. In the local areas served through
this initiative, FBCOs will provide comprehensive and coordinated
services to ex-offenders in the following three areas:
Employment: Employment is a critical stabilizing factor
for ex-offenders and this initiative will stress job placement, job
retention, and increasing the earnings potential of released prisoners.
FBCOs will offer job training and job placement services in
coordination with business, local One-Stop Centers, educational
institutions, and other employment providers. Partnering faith-based
and community organizations will provide each program participant with
work-readiness, soft skills training, mentoring, job placement or
referral for job placement, and post-placement support. The applicant
must provide educational services and hard skills training through
vouchers. These services must be provided by organizations that grant
industry-recognized credentials. These vouchers should be used to
supplement the limited supply of individual training accounts available
through the workforce system.
Housing: Because adequate housing for ex-offenders is an
important component of successful reentry, the initiative will stress
both satisfactory transitional housing and the movement from
transitional to permanent housing. Funds are not currently available
under this initiative to provide housing services for participants, but
the grants will require that linkages be developed at each site to
provide necessary housing services to participants. Subject to the
availability of appropriations, Federal funds to provide housing
services may be added to these grants in future years.
[[Page 16855]]
Mentoring: FBCOs will provide post-release mentoring and
other services essential to reintegrating ex-offenders in coordination
with the corrections, parole, and probation structure. Participating
adult ex-offenders will be matched with appropriate mentors who will be
primarily responsible for supporting the returnee in the community and
the work place. Mentors will offer support, guidance, and assistance
with the many challenges faced by ex-offenders.
As described above, local FBCOs will be primarily responsible for
ensuring connections to and delivering services to program participants
to achieve the main goals of long-term and meaningful employment,
reduction of criminal involvement, adequate transitional housing,
social connection, mental health and substance abuse counseling, and
other wraparound support services as needed. Funds to be awarded by the
Department of Justice under a separate solicitation will support the
activities of the criminal justice partners, both pre-release and
during the time released prisoners may be under supervision in the
community.
3. Design and Structure of the Initiative
What Is the Overall Structure of This Initiative?
We hope to serve 6,250 released prisoners during the first year of
this initiative, with projects operating in 30 communities across the
country. Under this announcement, DOL will be awarding grants to FBCOs
to oversee the provision of re-entry services in their community. DOJ
subsequently will award competitive grants to State agencies to provide
pre-release services for prisoners returning to the communities that
are awarded DOL grants.
Each lead local agency awarded a DOL grant may choose to directly
provide services to released prisoners; provide sub-grants to other
FBCOs to provide these services; or use a mixed approach of providing
some direct services themselves while using other FBCOs to also provide
services. We expect that most lead local agencies will need to sub-
grant some portion of their award to other FBCOs. If the lead local
agency is using sub-grantees, it will be responsible for providing
technical assistance and oversight to these other FBCOs.
FBCOs applying for these grants will identify as part of their
application the need for this Federal support in the community that
they plan to serve; their FBCO sub-grantees; and their plan for
providing services to released prisoners. They must also demonstrate
that they have established partnerships with the criminal justice
system, local Workforce Investment Board, and the local housing
authority. They must also identify their plan to leverage other
Federal, State, or local funding, as well as private funding sources,
to provide other wraparound support services that are not directly
funded through this initiative such as substance abuse and mental
health treatment.
Who Will Be the Grant Recipients Under This Initiative?
The recipients of the DOL grants will be faith-based and community
organizations that are located in or have a staff presence in the urban
community being served, and that have the capacity to serve as the lead
agency under this initiative, which in some cases will mean providing
technical assistance and oversight to other FBCOs.
What Types of Communities Will Be the Focus of These Grants?
We are looking to award grants in urban communities that are
heavily impacted by large numbers of prisoners returning to their
community each year, particularly those affected by high rates of
recidivism. A large metropolitan area could include more than one
community appropriate for a project under this initiative. For example,
DOL could award grants to lead FBCOs in more than one community within
the City of Los Angeles and surrounding areas. Therefore, you may
propose to serve a sub-area within a larger metropolitan area or an
entire small or medium-sized city. Given the amount of funds available
and the number of communities that we expect to serve, we expect that
an average of 200 released prisoners per community will be served in
the first year.
How Large a Grant Should I Apply for?
We anticipate that FBCOs will receive grants of approximately
$660,000 to cover their first year of operations. You may request a
larger or smaller amount based on the size of the community that you
propose to serve, but deviations from this amount must be clearly
justified in your application.
How Much Money Should the Lead FBCO Reserve for Providing Program
Administration, Including Technical Assistance and Oversight of the
Small FBCOs?
Limit the share of funds reserved for program administration,
including technical assistance and oversight, to 10 percent of the
amount for which you are applying. The remaining funds should be used
to provide services to returning prisoners. The application should
specify the share of funds the applicant will use for program
administration versus services.
If the Lead FBCO Is Planning To Make Sub-grants to Other FBCOs, Does it
Need To Make These Awards Competitively?
Grantees are required to have written procurement standards under
DOL regulations (29 CFR 95.44). The selection of sub-grantees should be
conducted, to the maximum extent practicable, in a manner designed to
ensure full and open competition (see 29 CFR 95.43). Where a provider
is selected non-competitively, the grantee must be able to justify why
it was not practicable to compete the selection, in accordance with its
procurement standards. The fact that the sub-awardee was identified in
the grant application does not alone suffice to demonstrate such
impracticability. The decision and justification for a non-competitive
selection is susceptible to questioning upon audit. DOL procurement
regulations at 29 CFR Part 95 do not contain standard provisions for
non-competitive selections.
In Preparing Their Applications, How Much Effort Should FBCOs Put Into
Identifying the Small FBCOs and Local Partnerships for These Projects?
If you are planning to provide sub-grants to others FBCOs, you
should use the three-month application period to identify and
competitively select these sub-grantees and develop strong partnerships
in the community that you propose to serve. Depending on your
procurement procedures, this could be sufficient time for you to
conduct a competition or to otherwise select the FBCOs that will be
your sub-grantees.
Lead FBCOs are expected to demonstrate connections to the criminal
justice system that will allow referrals of released prisoners who will
be returning to the community, as well as coordination with parole and
probation officers. We also encourage lead FBCOs to use this three-
month period to develop or strengthen partnerships with the Workforce
Investment Board (WIB) so that program participants will be able to
receive services from local One-Stop Centers. The application must
include letters of support from the local Workforce Investment Board
and from cooperating entities in the criminal justice system. Lead
FBCOs should also demonstrate linkages and cooperative partnerships
with local housing authorities, substance abuse and mental health
treatment providers, and other
[[Page 16856]]
organizations that provide services necessary to meet the needs of
returning prisoners.
What if Two or More FBCOs Submit Separate Applications To Serve the
Same Community or Metropolitan Area?
If more than one proposal to serve the same community or
metropolitan area are rated highly, we will determine whether the
community or metropolitan area is large enough to support more than one
project.
Can a National or Regional FBCO Apply To Serve Multiple Metropolitan
Areas?
Yes, but you must submit a separate application for each
metropolitan area that you propose to serve and you must demonstrate
that you have an existing presence in each metropolitan area for which
you apply. Single proposals applying to serve multiple metropolitan
areas will not be considered.
Can an FBCO Submit Two or More Applications For the Same Metropolitan
Area?
We expect that most FBCOs will propose to serve multiple
communities within a metropolitan area (for example, different
neighborhoods). In most cases, we expect to receive a single
application covering all communities that are proposed to be served
within a single metropolitan area. However, for very large metropolitan
areas, you may choose to submit separate proposals for distinct
communities (e.g., the Bronx and Brooklyn).
What Is the Target Group To Be Served Under These Grants?
Generally, grantees should plan to serve individuals 18 years old
and older who have been convicted as an adult and imprisoned pursuant
to an Act of Congress or a State law, and who have never been convicted
of a violent or sex-related offense. Additional information on eligible
beneficiaries is provided in Section III (1).
What Are Allowable Uses of Grant Funds?
DOL grant funds can be used to provide a variety of services to
returning prisoners, including workforce development services, job
training, on-the-job training, work experience, basic skills
remediation, counseling and case management, mentoring, and other
reentry services. DOL grant funds may not be used for substance abuse
treatment services. DOL grant funds should also not be used for pre-
release services other than recruitment, introductory meetings,
orientations, and other activities necessary to establishing program
connections with prisoners prior to their release. The DOJ grant to
State agencies will provide pre-release services.
Will There Be a Planning Period After Grant Award?
FBCOs will be allowed up to four months to put into place their
various local partnerships and to hire staff. The probability of
continuation of grants beyond the first year will be greatly reduced
for those grantees that do not begin providing services by the end of
the first four months.
How Will Success Be Measured Under These Grants?
Four outcome measures will be used to measure success in these
grants: entered employment rate, employment retention rate, earnings
change, and recidivism rate. In addition, grantees will report on a
number of leading indicators that will serve as predictors of success.
Leading indicators will include: Enrollment rate; participation in
education/training, workforce preparation, mentoring, and community
service; attainment of degrees and certificates; reduced substance
abuse; proportion of enrollees in stable housing; and proportion of
enrollees complying with parole conditions. In applying for these
grants, FBCOs and their sub-grantees agree to submit updated Management
Information System (MIS) data on enrollee characteristics, services
provided, placements, outcomes, and follow-up status.
Will There Be an Evaluation of This Initiative?
There will be a formal evaluation of this initiative. In applying
for these grants, lead FBCOs and their sub-grantees agree to cooperate
in this evaluation by providing enrollment and participation data and
other information during all years of the project and to participate in
a random assignment evaluation during the third and fourth years of the
project.
4. Guidelines for Technical Proposal
How Should I Organize My Technical Proposal?
Organize your technical proposal to answer the questions below.
Each proposal must apply for funds for a single metropolitan area. The
criteria below will be used to evaluate your proposal. Points will be
deducted from applications that are not responsive to these questions.
The technical questions are as follows:
#1. What is the need for the project in the community to be served
by the grant? (20 points) Identify the need in the community that you
propose to serve through your grant and make a case for the need for
the project in that area. Demonstrate how your community meets the
requirement of being an urban area heavily impacted by high numbers of
returning prisoners and high rates of recidivism. Use census tract data
from the 2000 census to show the population of the community, its
poverty rate, and its unemployment rate. Use local law enforcement data
to show the crime rate and recidivism rate for the community and how
this compares with the State or county as a whole. If there are
particular neighborhoods within the city in which you plan to focus
this grant, describe these neighborhoods and provide available data
specific to that area. We recognize that data might not be readily
available on the number of offenders returning to your community who
have never committed a violent crime, and so for the purpose of
establishing need (but not for determining eligibility for services
once the program starts) you can use data on the number of returning
prisoners whose most recent offense was non-violent. Use data that is
available from the State to estimate the number of non-violent
offenders returning each year to your community, and how this compares
to other areas in the State. If possible, provide such data for the
specific neighborhoods that you plan to serve rather than county-wide
data. If such data are not available from your State at the sub-county
level, data on the number of returning non-violent prisoners by county
from the National Corrections Reporting Program (NCRP) will be
available on ETA's web page at www.doleta.gov. Please note, however,
that the list on our web site will only include the 108 counties with
the largest number of returning prisoners, and will not include the
States of Alaska, Delaware, Idaho, Massachusetts, Montana, New Mexico,
Rhode Island, Vermont, and Wyoming. You can apply to serve a community
in a county that is not on this list. If you are applying from a
community in a county that is not included, provide the best data that
is available. Applicants will not be penalized for being in a State
that does not participate in the NCRP reporting system.
#2. What Is the Project Design and Service Strategy? (25 points)
Describe the project design and service strategy for each of the
following required program components.
[[Page 16857]]
How Do You Plan To Increase the Employment Opportunities of Released
Prisoners Who You Will Be Serving?
Describe how you will use funds available under this grant to
increase the employment opportunities of released prisoners. You and
your FBCO sub-grantees can directly provide assessment services, work-
readiness training, job placement, and post-placement support. Vouchers
or another mechanism of choice should be provided to participants
needing educational services or hard skills training. These vouchers
should be used to supplement the limited supply of individual training
accounts available through the workforce investment system. Educational
services and hard skills training must be provided by organizations
that grant industry-recognized credentials. Discuss how you will
conduct an initial assessment of each individual's educational
achievement and employability. Describe how you will provide job
readiness training for individuals in your program, and help them
explore career options. Describe the follow-up services that you will
provide to individuals. Be sure to indicate how many direct-service
staff will be hired with these grant funds.
Often a condition of release is to find employment quickly. How
will you help these persons find a job soon after their release from
prison? Describe your use of job developers and career counselors.
Describe how you will work with employers to identify and create job
openings for these persons. Discuss possible ways of building career
ladders into your job placements. Discuss how you will emphasize a
demand-driven approach in job development, seeking jobs in high-growth
and high-demand occupations. Describe links to local One-Stop Centers
and service providers under the Workforce Investment Act in the urban
area that you will serve. Discuss strategies to ensure that released
offenders have the forms of identification needed to obtain employment.
Discuss the possibility of having local employers serve on an advisory
board for you to develop job placements that are both geared to local
demand occupations and open to ex-offenders. Discuss whether you will
be using the Work Opportunity Tax Credit or Federal Bonding Program in
helping released prisoners find jobs. Discuss the possible use of on-
the-job training contracts to help place released prisoners in jobs in
which they can learn a skill. Discuss transitional employment
approaches that allow persons with little or no labor market experience
to gradually progress to jobs with more responsibility and higher pay.
Will you offer Try-Out Employment packages to employers in which you
pay for the first several weeks of wages to see if the employee is
going to succeed?
Describe possible links to local community colleges and trade
schools for individuals seeking job training or to continue their
education in the urban area that you will be serving. Many released
prisoners will have low reading levels. How will you increase the
literacy levels of these individuals? Many released prisoners will also
lack a high school diploma. How will you assist them to receive a GED
or attain a high school diploma? How do you plan to increase the
employment opportunities for released prisoners who have disabilities,
including psychiatric, learning, and developmental disabilities?
Also discuss how you will make sure that individuals you serve have
transportation to their work sites. Will you assist individuals to
learn to drive and get a drivers license? Will you help individuals
resolve warrants for past driving offenses that may prevent them from
driving now? Also discuss whether you will pay for work clothes and
work tools to get individuals started in jobs. Also discuss the
sustainability of these employment activities after Federal grant funds
cease.
How Will You Provide Housing Services to Released Prisoners?
Funds are not currently available under this initiative to provide
housing services for participants, but the grants will require that
linkages be developed in the community to provide necessary housing
services to participants. Describe potential linkages with local
agencies that provide housing services. Describe the technical
assistance that you will provide to sub-grantees to help them develop
such linkages. Discuss potential partnerships to provide both
transitional housing and permanent housing to released prisoners.
Please note that McKinney Vento Supportive Housing Program (SHP)
transitional and permanent housing funded through the Continuum of Care
application process cannot be used for ex-offenders. Discuss options
for assisting released prisoners who need to put a deposit on an
apartment. Discuss how you will ensure that appropriate housing
services are provided to released prisoners with physical and mental
disabilities. Please note that Federal funds to provide housing
services may be available for these grants in future years. If funds
are made available for these purposes grantees will be required to
expend funds in accordance with applicable Department of Housing and
Urban Development regulations.
How Will You Provide Mentoring for the Released Prisoners Who You Will
Be Serving?
We expect that mentoring will be a key part of this initiative;
that you will be able to offer mentors to each of the released
prisoners who desire these services enrolled during the first year; and
that mentors will be provided by faith-based and community
organizations. Discuss your plans for providing mentors to released
prisoners. Describe any experience that the lead FBCO has in operating
mentoring programs or how you will develop this capacity. If you are
using sub-grantees, describe the experience that your FBCO sub-grantees
have in operating mentoring programs or how you will develop this
capacity in them. How will the lead FBCO involve other local faith-
based and community organizations in recruiting mentors for this
project? What training will you provide to mentors? How will you make
sure that appropriate mentoring is available to released prisoners with
physical and mental disabilities? How do you plan to match the released
prisoners with appropriate mentors, taking into consideration factors
such as age, gender, life experiences, and career interests? If you
plan to make use of peer mentoring in your program, are you aware of
possible State prohibitions against ex-offenders associating with known
felons? Do you plan to use former prisoners that have successfully
reintegrated back into society to mentor recently released prisoners?
Do you expect to be able to sustain this mentoring component after
Federal grant funds cease? How will you ensure that the mentoring
programs funded through this project comply with Workforce Investment
Act and Establishment Clause guidelines that restrict Federal funding
of inherently religious activities (worship, instruction, and
proselytizing) and guarantee program participants' rights to free
exercise of religion?
How Will You Secure Alcohol and Drug Treatment and Other Health and
Social Services to Released Prisoners Who Require Such Assistance?
Provide examples of local partnerships that you have developed to
secure support services for released prisoners. Because grant funds
cannot be used to provide alcohol and drug treatment, give examples of
other resources that are available to provide
[[Page 16858]]
such services. Also give examples of local partnerships you have
developed to provide physical and mental health services. Many released
prisoners will be under court orders to pay child support and/or
restitution. How will you assist these individuals in complying with
these court orders? Discuss whether you will help individuals open
checking accounts at banks. How will you make sure that you have mental
health services available to released prisoners who need such services?
Discuss plans for providing any other social services that you
anticipate that returning prisoners will need. It is also important to
be able to demonstrate the ability to provide access to and
coordination with mainstream health, social services, and employment
resources for which non-violent ex-offenders may be eligible. These
programs include, but are not limited to, Medicaid, Social Security
Insurance Disability Benefits, Children's Health Insurance Program,
Temporary Assistance for Needy Families, Food Stamps, and services
funded through the Mental Health Block Grant and Substance Abuse Block
Grant, Workforce Investment Act, and Veterans Health Care.
#3. How will the lead FBCO and any sub-grantees work with the
criminal justice system in having released prisoners referred to the
program and in coordinating program services with community supervision
and law enforcement agencies? (20 points) Reentry by its very nature
must start behind the walls of an institution, whether the institution
is a prison, jail, or halfway house. As a result, a cooperative
partnership with corrections agencies is a critical component of this
initiative. Applicants must demonstrate the existence of a
collaboration with corrections agencies that will:
Identify potential program participants prior to release,
including a formalized referral and intake process from State or
Federal prisons, and in some case, local jails.
Identify specific needs of those participating in the
program.
Enable employment with identified program participants to
begin within 6 months after release.
Facilitate access to corrections facility for work with
offenders prior to release.
Coordinate provision of services and mentoring with
community supervision.
Released offenders often have terms of post-release supervision
that may include reporting requirements, drug and/or alcohol treatment,
counseling, etc. Failure to meet the terms of release often results in
revocation of probation or parole. A critical component of a successful
application will be a demonstration of a partnership between the
applicant and local representatives of law enforcement, including
police, probation and parole, to ensure coordination and cooperation in
accessing services to fulfill these terms of release. Please note that
restrictions on pre-release services are discussed in section I.3.
#4. What is the quality and experience of your organization to
serve as a lead local agency in overseeing this initiative? (25 points)
Describe your organization and its qualifications for serving as the
lead local FBCO in this initiative. How long has your organization been
in existence? What services and programs has it provided in the urban
area to be served by the grant? If you are planning to use sub-
grantees, discuss previous instances in which the organization has
overseen or coordinated the work of other FBCOs. Discuss previous
instances in which the organization has provided technical assistance
to other FBCOs. Discuss the experience of the organization in operating
social service programs, including the results of those programs (in
terms of individual service outcomes). Discuss any specific experience
relating to working with community-based and faith-based organizations.
Describe your experience working with criminal justice agencies.
Describe the qualifications of key staff persons of your organization
who may work on this project, and their specific experience relating to
this project. Also describe previous experience of the organization in
operating grants from either Federal or non-Federal sources. Describe
the fiscal controls in place in your organization. What is your
organization's current annual budget? Discuss how you will provide
fiscal oversight of sub-grantees. Describe your management plan for
overseeing and providing technical assistance to any sub-grantees.
If you plan to use sub-grantees, describe the faith-based and
community organizations that you propose to use for the project.
Describe their experience in operating workforce and social service
programs and the results of those programs. Describe any specific
experience operating programs for persons with alcohol or drug
addictions and persons with psychiatric disabilities. Describe any
specific experience recruiting or overseeing mentors, and the number of
mentors they have involved in their programs. Describe the experience
and qualifications of their staff persons who may have a role in this
project.
#5. What will be the results and cost-effectiveness of your project
and what non-Federal funds will you be able to leverage for the
project? (10 points) Describe the costs of this project in relation to
the expected benefits of services provided to released prisoners. For
example, compare the costs of incarceration for a year with your
expected cost-per-participant. Also, compare your per-participant
training and employment costs with those of other institutions. Also
discuss your expected performance outcomes (in terms of entered
employment rate, employment retention rate, earnings change, and
recidivism rate) and your plan for collecting, tracking, and reporting
data on these outcomes. Describe any non-Federal funds that you expect
to be able to leverage for this project.
II. Award Information
What Type of Assistance Instrument Will Be Awarded Under This
Initiative?
Funds will be awarded under this initiative through grants for an
initial period of one year, with up to three additional option years
depending on the availability of funds and demonstrated performance.
What Is the Expected Number of Awards?
We expect to award grants for 30 projects.
What Is the Total Amount Expected To Be Awarded Through This
Announcement?
DOL expects to award a total of $19.84 million in initial grants
through this announcement.
What Is the Expected Amount of Individual Awards?
DOL expects that initial awards will average $660,000.
III. Eligibility Information
1. Eligible Applicants
Am I an Eligible Applicant for These Grants?
You are eligible to apply for the DOL grants if you are a faith-
based or community-based organization and are located within or have a
staff presence within the urban community that is the focus of your
grant application. Urban communities are those that are located within
Urbanized Areas or Urban Clusters, as designated by the Census Bureau
in the 2000 Census.
National or regional FBCOs may submit separate proposals for more
than
[[Page 16859]]
one metropolitan area, but applicants must demonstrate that they have a
presence in each metropolitan area for which they submit a separate
application for each metropolitan area.
Can an FBCO Be Listed as a Sub-Grantee in More Than One Application?
Yes, but if an FBCO is listed as a sub-grantee in two winning
proposals, it will only be allowed to receive a sub-grant award from
one grant.
Who Is Eligible To Be Served Under These Grants?
Individuals 18 years old and older who have been convicted as an
adult and imprisoned pursuant to an Act of Congress or a State law, and
who have never been convicted of a violent or sex-related offense can
be served with these grants. Individuals should be enrolled in the
program within 180 days after their release from prison or a halfway
house. Up to 10 percent of individuals served can be enrolled over 180
days from their prison release. Services may be provided to individuals
who have been released from prison and are residing in a halfway house.
Non-violent offenses are those offenses described in State and
Federal statutes encompassing property crime, drug offenses, and public
order crimes. Property crimes include, but are not limited to:
Burglary, larceny, motor vehicle theft, and receiving stolen property.
Drug crimes include, but are not limited to: Possession of a controlled
substance, trafficking in a controlled substance, and possession of
drug paraphernalia. Public order offenses include, but are not limited
to: commercial vice, gambling, animal cruelty and drinking while
intoxicated.
If an FBCO exhausts its supply of eligible offenders during the
course of the grant period, it may request approval from the DOL grant
officer to expand its eligible population. Approval of such a request
will require the use of a validated risk assessment tool and
consideration of the nature of any prior violent offense in
consultation with the Department of Justice.
This program is subject to the provisions of the ``Jobs for
Veterans Act,'' Public Law 107-288, which provides priority of service
to veterans and spouses of certain veterans for the receipt of
employment, training, and placement services in any job training
program directly funded, in whole or in part, by the Department of
Labor. Please note that, to obtain priority of service, a veteran must
meet the program's eligibility requirements. ETA Training and
Employment Guidance Letter (TEGL) No. 5-03 (September 16, 2003)
provides general guidance on the scope of the veterans priority statute
and its effect on current employment and training programs, and
additional guidance is available at the ``Jobs for Veterans Priority of
Services Website'' (https://www.doleta.gov/programs/ VETS/).
2. Cost Sharing or Matching
Is Cost Sharing or Matching Required for These Grants?
No, cost sharing or matching is not required, although leveraging
of non-Federal resources is strongly encouraged. In addition,
applicants will be selected, in part, based on their plans to tap such
resources to support program activities.
IV. Application and Submission Information
1. Address To Request Application Package
This SGA includes all information and forms needed to apply for
this funding opportunity.
2. Content and Form of Application Submission
What Are the Content and Form of Application Submission?
Each application must address one or more urban communities within
a single metropolitan area. Applicants must submit an original signed
application and three hard copies to the Department of Labor. The
proposal must consist of two (2) separate and distinct parts.
Applications that fail to adhere to the instructions in this section
will be considered non-responsive and will not be considered.
Part 1 of the proposal is the Cost Proposal and must include the
following three items:
The Standard Form (SF) 424, ``Application for Federal
Assistance'' (Appendix A). (also available at https://
www.whitehouse.gov/omb/grants/sf424.pdf). The SF 424 must clearly
identify the applicant and be signed by an individual with authority to
enter into a grant agreement. Applicants are required to have a Dun and
Bradstreet (DUNS) number which is a nine-digit identification number
that uniquely identifies business entities. To obtain a DUNS number,
access the Web site: www.dunandbradstreet.com or call 1-866-705-5711.
Applicants must supply their DUNS number in item 5 of the new
SF-424 issued by OMB (rev. 9-2003).
The Budget Information Form SF-424A (Appendix B). (also
available at https://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/grants/sf424a.pdf). In
preparing the Budget information form, the applicant must provide a
concise narrative explanation for each line item to support the request
and should discuss precisely how the administrative costs support the
project goals. Also provide a detailed back-up budget that includes the
number of staff to be hired by job title.
The Equal Employment Opportunity Survey Form (Appendix C) is an
optional part of the Cost Proposal.
Part 2 of the application is the Technical Proposal, which
demonstrates the applicant's capabilities to plan and implement the
Prisoner Reentry Initiative grant project in accordance with the
provisions of this solicitation. The guidelines for the content of the
Technical Proposal are provided in Section I(4) of this SGA. The
Technical Proposal is limited to twenty (20) double-spaced single-sided
pages with 12 point text font and one-inch margins. In addition, the
applicant must provide letters of support from the criminal justice
agencies which will release the prisoners and supervise their release
in the community and the local Workforce Investment Board; a list of
proposed staff positions to be funded by the grant; a Time Line
outlining project activities; and a two-page Executive Summary. These
additional materials do not count against the 20-page limit for the
Technical proposal, but may not exceed fifteen (15) pages.
3. Submissions Dates, Times, and Address
Will There Be Informational Conferences for Organizations Planning To
Apply?
There will be three information conferences held for this grant
competition. The dates and locations of these information conferences
will be posted concurrently on ETA's Web site at https://www.doleta.gov
and DOJ's Web site at https://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/rentry. For potential
applicants who cannot attend one of these conferences, a tape of the
first conference will be available on both Web sites.
What Is the Closing Date for Applications?
The closing date for receipt of applications under this
announcement is July 13, 2005. Applications must be received at the
address below no later than 5 p.m. (eastern time). Applications sent by
e-mail, telegram, or facsimile (fax) will not be accepted. Applications
that do not meet the conditions set forth in this notice will not be
considered. No exceptions to the mailing and delivery
[[Page 16860]]
requirements set forth in this notice will be granted.
To What Address Should I Send My Application?
Mailed applications must be addressed to the U.S. Department of
Labor, Employment and Training Administration, Division of Federal
Assistance, Attention: Eric D. Luetkenhaus, Reference SGA/DFA PY04-08,
200 Constitution Avenue, NW., Room N-4438, Washington, DC 20210.
Applicants are advised that mail delivery in the Washington area may be
delayed due to mail decontamination procedures. Hand delivered
proposals will be received at the above address. All overnight mail
will be considered to be hand-delivered and must be received at the
designated place by the specified closing date.
Applicants may apply online at https://www.grants.gov. Any
application received after the deadline will not be accepted. For
applicants submitting electronic applications via Grants.gov, it is
strongly recommended that you immediately initiate and complete the
``Get Started'' steps to register with Grants.gov at https://
www.grants.gov/GetStarted. These steps will probably take multiple days
to complete which should be factored in to your plans for electronic
application submission in order to avoid facing unexpected delays that
could result in the rejection of your application.
Late Applications: Any application received after the exact date
and time specified for receipt at the office designated in this notice
will not be considered, unless it is received before awards are made
and it (a) was sent by U.S. Postal Service registered or certified mail
not later than the fifth calendar day before the date specified for
receipt of applications (that is, no later than July 8, 2005) or (b)
was sent by U.S. Postal Service Express Mail or Online to addressee not
later than 5 p.m. at the place of mailing or electronic submission one
working day prior to the date specified for receipt of applications
(that is, no later than July 12, 2005). It is highly recommended that
online submissions be completed one working day prior to the date
specified for receipt of applications to ensure that the applicant
still has the option to submit by U.S. Postal Service Express Mail in
the event of any electronic submission problems. ``Post marked'' means
a printed, stamped or otherwise placed impression (exclusive of a
postage meter machine impression) that is readily identifiable, without
further action, as having been supplied or affixed on the date of
mailing by an employee of the U.S. Postal Service. Therefore,
applicants should request the postal clerk to place a legible hand
cancellation ``bull's eye'' postmark on both the receipt and the
package. Failure to adhere to the above instructions will be a basis
for a determination of nonresponsiveness.
4. Intergovernmental Review
Is an Intergovernmental Review Required?
This funding opportunity is not subject to Executive Order (EO)
12372, ``Intergovernmental Review of Federal Programs.''
5. Funding Restrictions
Are There Funding Restrictions?
All proposal costs must be necessary and reasonable in accordance
with Federal guidelines. Determinations of allowable costs will be made
in accordance with the applicable Federal cost principles, e.g., 29 CFR
95.27; Non-Profit Organizations--OMB Circular A-122. Disallowed costs
are those charges to a grant that the grantor agency or its
representative determines not to be allowed in accordance with the
applicable Federal Cost Principles or other conditions contained in the
grant. Applicants will not be entitled to reimbursement of pre-award
costs.
The government is prohibited from providing direct support to
religious activity.\10\ See 29 CFR part 2, subpart D. Provision
relating to the use of indirect support (such as through vouchers) are
at 29 CFR 2.33(c) and 20 CFR 667.266. These grants may not be used to
directly support religious instruction, worship, prayer, proselytizing
or other inherently religious practices. Neutral, secular criteria that
neither favor nor disfavor religion must be employed in the selection
of grant and sub-grant recipients. In addition, under the WIA and DOL
regulations implementing the Workforce Investment Act, a recipient may
not use direct Federal assistance to train a participant in religious
activities, or employ participants to construct, operate, or maintain
any part of a facility that is used or to be used for religious
instruction or worship. See 29 CFR 37.6(f). Under WIA, ``no individual
shall be excluded from participation in, denied the benefits of,
subjected to discrimination under, or denied employment in the
administration of or in connection with, any such program or activity
because of race, color, religion, sex (except as otherwise permitted
under Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972), national origin,
age, disability, or political affiliation or belief.''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ The term ``direct'' support is used to describe funds or
other support that are provided ``directly'' by a governmental
entity or an intermediate organization with the same duties as a
governmental entity, as opposed to funds that an organization
receives ``indirectly'' as the result of the genuine and independent
private choice of a beneficiary within the meaning of the
Establishment Clause of the U.S. Constitution.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
DOL grant funds should not be used for pre-release services other
than recruitment, introductory meetings, orientations, and other
activities necessary to establishing program connections with prisoners
prior to their release. This restriction on pre-release services does
not apply to halfway houses. Additionally, grant funds should not be
used to provide substance abuse treatment. Such treatment should be
made available to persons enrolled in the program using resources
available through partnerships with other agencies.
6. Other Submission Requirements
Can Applications Be Withdrawn?
Applications may be withdrawn by written notice or telegram
(including mailgram) received at any time before an award is made.
Applications may be withdrawn in person by the applicant or by an
authorized representative thereof, if the representative's identity is
made known and the representative signs a receipt for the proposal.
V. Application Review Information
1. Criteria for Review
What Will Be the Criteria for Award?
Panelists will rate proposals based on the following criteria,
which are explained in detail in Section I(4) of this SGA.
(1) Need in the city and neighborhoods to be served (20 points);
(2) Project design and service strategy, including sustainability
(25 points);
(3) Connections to the criminal justice system for referring
prisoners to the program and coordinating services upon release (20
points);
(4) Quality and experience of lead FBCO, including ability to
manage the project (25 points);
(5) Cost-effectiveness and leveraging of non-Federal resources (10
points).
2. Review and Selection Process
How Will Applications Be Reviewed and Selected?
Proposals that are timely and responsive to the requirements of
this SGA will be rated against the criteria listed above by an
independent panel comprised of representatives from DOL, DOJ, HUD, and
HHS. The panel recommendations to the Grant Officer
[[Page 16861]]
are advisory in nature. The Grant Officer may consider any information
that comes to his or her attention. Final award decisions will be based
on the best interests of the government, including consideration of
geographic balance, program balance, and diversity. The Department may
elect to award grants either with or without discussions with the
applicant. In situations without discussion, an award will be based on
the applicant's signature on the SF 424, which constitutes a binding
offer.
VI. Award Administration Information
1. Award Notices
Award Notices--All award notifications will be made by mail and
posted on the ETA home page at https://www.doleta.gov. Non-selected
applicants will be notified by mail.
2. Administrative and National Policy Requirements
All grantees, including faith-based organizations, will be subject
to all applicable Federal laws (including provisions of appropriation
laws), regulations, and the applicable Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) Circulars. The grant(s) awarded under this SGA must comply with
all provisions of this solicitation and will be subject to the
following administrative standards and provisions, as applicable to the
particular grantee:
a. 20 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 667.220.
(Administrative Costs).
b. Non-Profit Organizations--Office of Management and Budget (OMB)
Circulars A-122 (Cost Principles) and 29 CFR Part 95 (Administrative
Requirements).
c. Educational Institutions--OMB Circulars A-21 (Cost Principles)
and 29 CFR Part 95 (Administrative Requirements).
d. All entities must comply with 29 CFR Parts 93 and 98, and, where
applicable, 29 CFR Parts 96 and 99.
e. In accordance with Section 18 of the Lobbying Disclosure Act of
1995, Public Law 104-65 (2 U.S.C. 1611) non-profit entities
incorporated under Internal Revenue Service Code section 501(c)(4) that
engage in lobbying activities are not eligible to receive Federal funds
and grants.
f. 29 CFR part 2, subpart D--Equal Treatment in Department of Labor
Programs for Religious Organizations; Protection of Religious Liberty
of Department of Labor Social Service Providers and Beneficiaries;
g. 29 CFR part 30--Equal Employment Opportunity in Apprenticeship
and Training;
h. 29 CFR part 31--Nondiscrimination in Federally Assisted Programs
of the Department of Labor--Effectuation of Title VI of the Civil
Rights Act of 1964;
i. 29 CFR part 32--Nondiscrimination on the Basis of Handicap in
Programs and Activities Receiving or Benefiting from Federal Financial
Assistance;
j. 29 CFR part 33--Enforcement of Nondiscrimination on the Basis of
Handicap in Programs or Activities Conducted by the Department of
Labor;
k. 29 CFR part 35--Nondiscrimination on the Basis of Age in
Programs or Activities Receiving Federal Financial Assistance from the
Department of Labor;
l. 29 CFR part 36--Nondiscrimination on the Basis of Sex in
Education Programs or Activities Receiving Federal Financial
Assistance;
m. 29 CFR part 37--Implementation of the Nondiscrimination and
Equal Opportunity Provisions of the Workforce Investment Act of 1998
(WIA).
Note: Except as specifically provided in this Notice, DOL/ETA's
acceptance of a proposal and an award of Federal funds to sponsor
any programs(s) does not provide a waiver of any grant requirements
and/or procedures.
3. Reporting
What Reporting Will Be Required Under These Grants?
The grantee is required to provide the reports and documents listed
below:
Quarterly Financial Reports. A Quarterly Financial Status Report
(SF 269) is required until such time as all funds have been expended or
the grant period has expired. Quarterly reports are due 30 days after
the end of each calendar year quarter. Grantees must use ETA's On-Line
Electronic Reporting System.
Quarterly Progress Reports. The grantee must submit a quarterly
progress report to the designated Federal Project Officer within 30
days after the end of each quarter. Two copies are to be submitted
providing a detailed account of activities undertaken during that
quarter. DOL may require additional data elements to be collected and
reported on either a regular basis or special request basis. Grantees
must agree to meet DOL reporting requirements. The quarterly progress
report should be in narrative form and should include:
1. In-depth information on accomplishments, including project
success stories, upcoming grant activities, and promising approaches
and processes.
2. Progress toward performance outcomes, including updates on
product, curricula, and training development.
MIS Reports. FBCOs and their sub-grantees will be required to
submit updated MIS data on enrollment, services provided, placements,
outcomes, and follow-up status. A government-procured MIS system will
be provided to all grantees. Grantees will be required to have
industry-standard computer hardware and high-speed Internet access in
order to use the MIS system. Grant funds may be used with the prior
approval of the Grant Officer to upgrade computer hardware and Internet
access to enable projects to use the MIS system.
Quarterly financial reports, quarterly progress reports, and MIS
data will all be provided electronically.
VII. Agency Contacts
Any questions regarding this SGA should be faxed to Kevin Brumback,
Grants Management Specialist, Division of Federal Assistance, FAX
number (202) 693-2705. (This is not a toll-free number). You must
specifically address your FAX to the attention of Kevin Brumback and
should include SGA/DFA PY 04-08, a contact name, fax and phone number.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Please contact Kevin Brumback, Grants
Management Specialist, Division of Federal Assistance, on (202) 693-
3381. (This is not a toll-free number). This announcement is also being
made available on the ETA Web site at https://www.doleta.gov/sga/sga.cfm
and https://www.grants.gov.
Signed in Washington, DC, this 29th day of March, 2005.
Eric D. Luetkenhaus,
Grant Officer, Employment and Training Administration.
Appendix A: SF-424 Application for Federal Assistance
Appendix B: SF-424A Budget Form
Appendix C: OMB Survey N. 1890-0014: Survey on Ensuring Equal
Opportunity for Applicants
BILLING CODE 4510-30-P
[[Page 16862]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN01AP05.005
[[Page 16863]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN01AP05.006
[[Page 16864]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN01AP05.007
[[Page 16865]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN01AP05.008
[[Page 16866]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN01AP05.009
[[Page 16867]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN01AP05.010
[[Page 16868]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN01AP05.011
[[Page 16869]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN01AP05.012
[[Page 16870]]
[FR Doc. 05-6484 Filed 3-31-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-C